The miracle of World Trade Center 7

By Dark Politricks

I would advise anybody who cares about 9/11 and the lies put out by the US government to cover the inconsistencies and outright falsehoods in the official conspiracy story to read the following article by David Ray Griffin which accompanies his new book on the mystery of WT7 the Achilles heel in the official story.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-mysterious-collapse-of-wtc-seven.html

I will summarise the points for those who do not care or do not wish to understand the outright lies in the official explanation of the collapse of WT7 by the NIST. Remember this was a 47 story skyscraper that was not hit by any plane on 9/11 but yet collapsed at free fall speed late in the afternoon of that day.

1. Admission of free fall collapse which breaks the laws of physics.

The NIST said that the collapse occurred in 3 stages. It described the second stage as “a free-fall descent over approximately eight stories at gravitational acceleration for approximately 2.25 s[econds]“. Gravitational acceleration meaning free fall acceleration. Therefore the NIST is admitting that part of the collapse of WT7 happened at free fall which does not make sense compared to the rest of their theory as without controlled demolition to remove part of the structure holding the building up there would have been resistance to prevent any free fall collapse. Therefore they admit their own report is illogical.

2. Outright falsification and omission of evidence.

The NIST ignored numerous eye witness reports of molten steel from numerous government officials. They ignored a piece of steel containing so many holes that it looked like swiss cheese that an earlier FEMA report called

“the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation.”

They also ignored reports carried out by insurance companies for Deutsche Bank which wanted someone to pay for the cleanup of their building covered in the metallic dust from the collapse of the trade center twin towers. These reports confirmed that the dust from the WTC contained proof of temperatures hot enough to melt iron, vaporise lead 1,749°C (3,180°F) and melt molybdenum 2,623°C (4,753°F).

Normal fires do not do this but explosives do. As the NIST had to prove fires were the cause of the collapse they ignored this evidence in their final report.

They also ignored evidence carried out by another team of scientists that showed this dust contained nanothermite a highly explosive material. Therefore any evidence that contradicted their pre-concieved cause of collapse by fire was ignored.

3. The NIST ignored a key eye witness account who was recently found dead in suspicious circumstances.

A government employee by the name of Barry Jennings gave evidence to the NIST as well as carrying out interviews on the day and after the fact about his time stuck in the building of WT7.  You can watch his original interview on the day of 9/11 and a later one to loose change below.

He was on the 23rd floor waiting to meet major Giuliani as expected alongside Michael Hess when he was told to leave the building quickly. This was early in the morning before either of the twin towers had collapsed and therefore before any damage from the collapse had hit WT7. As he was descending the stairs due to the lift being out of action an explosion took out the floor below him. He then had to go back up a few floors and was finally rescued an hour and half later after the twin towers had collapsed. He also on record as walking over numerous dead bodies as he descended the stairs to the lobby of the building which goes against the official story that no-one died in WT7.

The NIST ignored this vital and credible eye witness account of explosions, dead bodies and a timeline that went against the official story and instead took Major Giuliani explanation for the explosion that Barry had witnessed as being the result of debris hitting the building from the collapse of the North Tower.

Barry Jennings died 2 days before the NIST released their final report. A private invesitagator hired to find the cause of his death refused to take the case and apparently as of yet there is no known cause of death in the public domain.

4. The NISTs final report ignores its earlier report.

The NIST’s final report ignores its own earlier interim reports and contradicts evidence it had earlier put into the public domain. Points such as the extent of the fires in the building, its earlier report claimed the fires had burnt out earlier than in its final report. It also claimed that the girders and beams that supposedly gave way were attached to the floor by sheer studs in its earlier report but by the final report it claimed that one of the crucial differences in design of the building that led to its collapse was “the absence of [girder] shear studs that would have provided lateral restraint.”

5. NIST theory of collapse is only provable by computer theory.

The NIST used computer simulations and models to come up with its theory for collapse. It set values for numerous parameters that were fed into the model and then tweaked the model until a collapse occurred in the simulation. One of the key points the NIST makes for the reason for the collapse of WT7 is that of “thermal expansion”, the heat of the fires caused the steel to expand which then caused further incremental damage that build up and led to the collapse of the building. However this not proof of anything and only a possible explanation if all the parameter values they inputted into the computer model actually matched those on the actual day of 9/11.

The NIST explain that differences in thermal expansion between the steel beams and the concrete floor slabs was the primary reason for the collapse of the sheer studs that led to the destruction of the building. However in their computer model the NIST did not factor in any heating of the concrete slabs whereas it did for the steel beams so of course there would be a difference in the thermal expansion of these two as only one was being heated within the model!

The collapse of WT7 has been one of the most enduring mysteries of 9/11. Earlier attempts by FEMA to explain the collapse could not come up with a credible explaination and the NIST took 7 years to come up with a report that omits important evidence and is soley based on a computer model that totally ignores the possibity of demolition by explosive charges. We also have the famous “pull it” interview by Larry Silverstein which implies a decision to take the building down which he later denies.

Remember until 9/11 the collapse of a sky scraper was quite a rare event and then on one day we had the collapse of 3 buildings one of which was not even hit by a plane. I know New York was a city whose building trade was run by the mafia at the time the buildings went up in the early 70’s and I would guess that building materials would be skimmed and cut to make a profit however even if you put the collapse of the twin towers down to the planes and fires plus dodgy building materials this does not explain the collapse of WT7 and the NIST report most definitely does not provide a satisfactory answer to the question.

You can buy David Ray Griffins book “The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7″ on Amazon.