Skip to content

The miracle of World Trade Center 7

By Dark Politricks

I would advise anybody who cares about 9/11 and the lies put out by the US government to cover the inconsistencies and outright falsehoods in the official conspiracy story to read the following article by David Ray Griffin which accompanies his new book on the mystery of WT7 the Achilles heel in the official story.

I will summarise the points for those who do not care or do not wish to understand the outright lies in the official explanation of the collapse of WT7 by the NIST. Remember this was a 47 story skyscraper that was not hit by any plane on 9/11 but yet collapsed at free fall speed late in the afternoon of that day.

1. Admission of free fall collapse which breaks the laws of physics.

The NIST said that the collapse occurred in 3 stages. It described the second stage as “a free-fall descent over approximately eight stories at gravitational acceleration for approximately 2.25 s[econds]”. Gravitational acceleration meaning free fall acceleration. Therefore the NIST is admitting that part of the collapse of WT7 happened at free fall which does not make sense compared to the rest of their theory as without controlled demolition to remove part of the structure holding the building up there would have been resistance to prevent any free fall collapse. Therefore they admit their own report is illogical.

2. Outright falsification and omission of evidence.

The NIST ignored numerous eye witness reports of molten steel from numerous government officials. They ignored a piece of steel containing so many holes that it looked like swiss cheese that an earlier FEMA report called

“the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation.”

They also ignored reports carried out by insurance companies for Deutsche Bank which wanted someone to pay for the cleanup of their building covered in the metallic dust from the collapse of the trade center twin towers. These reports confirmed that the dust from the WTC contained proof of temperatures hot enough to melt iron, vaporise lead 1,749°C (3,180°F) and melt molybdenum 2,623°C (4,753°F).

Normal fires do not do this but explosives do. As the NIST had to prove fires were the cause of the collapse they ignored this evidence in their final report.

They also ignored evidence carried out by another team of scientists that showed this dust contained nanothermite a highly explosive material. Therefore any evidence that contradicted their pre-concieved cause of collapse by fire was ignored.

3. The NIST ignored a key eye witness account who was recently found dead in suspicious circumstances.

A government employee by the name of Barry Jennings gave evidence to the NIST as well as carrying out interviews on the day and after the fact about his time stuck in the building of WT7.  You can watch his original interview on the day of 9/11 and a later one to loose change below.

He was on the 23rd floor waiting to meet major Giuliani as expected alongside Michael Hess when he was told to leave the building quickly. This was early in the morning before either of the twin towers had collapsed and therefore before any damage from the collapse had hit WT7. As he was descending the stairs due to the lift being out of action an explosion took out the floor below him. He then had to go back up a few floors and was finally rescued an hour and half later after the twin towers had collapsed. He also on record as walking over numerous dead bodies as he descended the stairs to the lobby of the building which goes against the official story that no-one died in WT7.

The NIST ignored this vital and credible eye witness account of explosions, dead bodies and a timeline that went against the official story and instead took Major Giuliani explanation for the explosion that Barry had witnessed as being the result of debris hitting the building from the collapse of the North Tower.

Barry Jennings died 2 days before the NIST released their final report. A private invesitagator hired to find the cause of his death refused to take the case and apparently as of yet there is no known cause of death in the public domain.

4. The NISTs final report ignores its earlier report.

The NIST’s final report ignores its own earlier interim reports and contradicts evidence it had earlier put into the public domain. Points such as the extent of the fires in the building, its earlier report claimed the fires had burnt out earlier than in its final report. It also claimed that the girders and beams that supposedly gave way were attached to the floor by sheer studs in its earlier report but by the final report it claimed that one of the crucial differences in design of the building that led to its collapse was “the absence of [girder] shear studs that would have provided lateral restraint.”

5. NIST theory of collapse is only provable by computer theory.

The NIST used computer simulations and models to come up with its theory for collapse. It set values for numerous parameters that were fed into the model and then tweaked the model until a collapse occurred in the simulation. One of the key points the NIST makes for the reason for the collapse of WT7 is that of “thermal expansion”, the heat of the fires caused the steel to expand which then caused further incremental damage that build up and led to the collapse of the building. However this not proof of anything and only a possible explanation if all the parameter values they inputted into the computer model actually matched those on the actual day of 9/11.

The NIST explain that differences in thermal expansion between the steel beams and the concrete floor slabs was the primary reason for the collapse of the sheer studs that led to the destruction of the building. However in their computer model the NIST did not factor in any heating of the concrete slabs whereas it did for the steel beams so of course there would be a difference in the thermal expansion of these two as only one was being heated within the model!

The collapse of WT7 has been one of the most enduring mysteries of 9/11. Earlier attempts by FEMA to explain the collapse could not come up with a credible explaination and the NIST took 7 years to come up with a report that omits important evidence and is soley based on a computer model that totally ignores the possibity of demolition by explosive charges. We also have the famous “pull it” interview by Larry Silverstein which implies a decision to take the building down which he later denies.

Remember until 9/11 the collapse of a sky scraper was quite a rare event and then on one day we had the collapse of 3 buildings one of which was not even hit by a plane. I know New York was a city whose building trade was run by the mafia at the time the buildings went up in the early 70’s and I would guess that building materials would be skimmed and cut to make a profit however even if you put the collapse of the twin towers down to the planes and fires plus dodgy building materials this does not explain the collapse of WT7 and the NIST report most definitely does not provide a satisfactory answer to the question.

You can buy David Ray Griffins book “The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7” on Amazon.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in conspiracy, Dark Politricks Articles, False Flag, War on terror.

Tagged with , , .

3 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Questions about 9/11 – Dark Politricks linked to this post on April 11, 2010

    […] What caused Barry Jennings an eye witness survivor from WTC-7 to die just a couple of days before the NIST report on the collapse of that building was released. Barry had been very vocal in his eye witness testimony giving interviews to television channels on […]

  2. 9.11 sceptics versus logic, reason and scientific principles | Dark Politricks linked to this post on October 23, 2010

    […] The collapse of WTC-7 which was not hit by any plane and fell at near free-fall speed looking exactly like a controlled demolition was under reported and treated like a non event. Even today many people who still believe the official story have no idea that a third skyscraper collapsed in New York that day. […]

  3. Physical science and the case for controlled demolition at WTC-7 | Hot to Spot linked to this post on June 8, 2011

    […] to re-build America’s defences.However like most people who have looked into .11 I have found the collapse of WTC-7 to be the biggest thorn in the side of the official story.Like a lot of people I find it very hard […]

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.


Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?