Skip to content


Five Good Reasons to Avoid a War with Iran

Philip Giraldi
Campaign For Liberty
Monday, Dec 7th, 2009

As America’s founding fathers clearly understood war is a serious business and should only be engaged in when there is a threat to vital national interests. The US Constitution stipulates that there must be a declaration of war from congress, a safeguard inserted in the document to prevent presidents from going to war without a clear national consensus behind them. Nevertheless, even though the federal government has fought many wars in the past hundred years only two were preceded by an actual declaration by Congress, World War I and World War II. Every other war has been both illegal and unconstitutional, including the current involvement in Iraq, Afghanistan, and on various fronts in the so-called global war on terror. Given this legacy of nearly constant and unconstitutional conflict, another Middle Eastern war would only confirm in the minds of many that the United States has become a rogue nation, continuously at war as if it were a natural state. It would also increase concerns that Washington is committed to an expanding confrontation with the Muslim world, a perception, true or false, that can only have bad consequences for the American people.

It is likely that the United States will eventually go to war with Iran. I say this with some confidence. First, both the Obama Administration and Congress are moving rapidly towards harsh sanctions, reflected in the public utterances of Obama and Hillary Clinton and in Congress through HR 2194, which will embargo all refined petroleum imports into Iran, a blockade that will have to be enforced by the US Navy and will be equivalent to an act of war. Second, the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency, under pressure from the US and the Europeans to act, has passed a highly critical resolution relating to the Iranian nuclear energy program. Together the maneuverings in Vienna and Washington provide a legal framework for international action directed against Tehran, not unlike Washington’s UN engagement that preceded the Iraq invasion. Pressure from both directions means that talks to resolve the issue of Iranian nuclear plans will end and it is only a matter of time before an incident between US and Iranian armed forces leads to a shooting war. It will be yet another conflict in the Middle East that could easily have been avoided, fought without any congressional declaration of war and most likely financed on borrowed money.

Critics of Iran note that the country has a repressive government, that it may have held elections during the summer that were fraudulent, and that it has sometimes problematical relationships with a number of its neighbors. But even conceding that all of that might be true the United States is not directly endangered and it is not the business of Washington to intervene in another country to bring about change. The complaint that Iran might be developing nuclear weapons is more serious because such devices are potentially a threat to everyone, but it must be viewed in context. Iran is confronted by a nuclear armed United States and Israel, both of which have frequently asserted their right to use military force against it. If the Iranian leadership has responded by using the possibility of its developing a nuclear weapon as a bargaining chip no one should be terribly surprised.

I believe there are five good reasons why the United States should do everything possible to avoid a war with Iran. First and foremost is the fact that Iran does not and realistically speaking cannot pose a threat against the United States. Iran is a developing country with a stagnating oil based economy one seventeenth as large as that of the US and a military budget just 1% of Washington’s. As Congressman Ron Paul has noted, Iran cannot even refine its own oil, requiring it to buy on the international market, suggesting that it will face insurmountable technical problems if it even tries to develop a nuclear weapon. Iran is not Nazi Germany, with which it is often inaccurately compared, and has virtually no domestic armaments industry. The best available intelligence indicates that Iran currently is not developing a nuclear weapon, though it also suggests that it might move in that direction if attempts to isolate it are intensified, ironically leading to a weapons program where none existed.

Second, the United States can’t afford another war, most particularly a “war of choice.” Iraq and Afghanistan have already cost nearly $1 trillion and will add more than $130 billion over the next year even without President Obama’s escalation in forces, which will total another $34 billion. Those who support America’s wars claim that the cost of war is small relative to the size of the US economy, but that kind of thinking is based on a false premise, i.e. that conflict somehow benefits the United States. America does not have to be fighting in the Middle East and Central Asia and it is far more reasonable to argue that any money being spent in support of such an effort is essentially wasted. It should be used in the United States to make the lives of Americans better or it should be given back to the taxpayers.

Third, no war goes according to plan and there are always unintended consequences. The same voices in Washington that promised a cakewalk in Iraq are promising more of the same against Iran yet they ignore the fact that 120,000 American soldiers remain in Iraq after the military triumph nearly seven years ago. More than four thousand American soldiers are dead and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and Afghans. And Iran would be an infinitely tougher nut to crack than either Afghanistan or Iraq. It is larger, more populous, and has had more than six years to prepare for an attack. It can wreak havoc in neighboring Iraq and Afghanistan and can reduce the oil flow through the Persian Gulf to a trickle. It might even get lucky and use its Chinese silkworm missiles to sink a US Navy ship or two. Bombing Iran’s so-called nuclear sites would kill many civilians and produce negative blowback. Following the example of North Korea, it would likely convince the Iranian government that developing a nuclear weapon is the only real way to protect against attack from Washington and Israel.

Fourth, attacking Iran after invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq would send the message that the United States is pursuing a policy of incremental regime change for the entire Muslim world. Washington should not be in the business of the currently fashionable bipartisan euphemism “democracy promotion” first and foremost because it is none of our business how other people govern themselves. On a practical level such efforts have proven to be ineffective at best and frequently even succeed in creating a worse situation. One only has to cite the evidence of America’s proxy regimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, both of which are at the bottom of Transparency International’s corruption scale, just above Somalia. In Iran, US support for democracy as espoused by the so-called reformers will only strengthen the hand of conservatives who will be able to claim with some plausibility that the opposition is controlled by foreign interests and is disloyal.

Fifth, war against Iran would complete the transformation of America into a nation dominated by war. It would be the final blow against those who believe in small government and individual liberties. War with Iran will inevitably lead to an increase in the size of federal bureaucracies, most particularly the Defense Department, the Department of Homeland Security and the intelligence services and will lead to calls for greater government intrusion in the lives of all Americans “to make us safe.” As James Madison put it, “If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. . . Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.”

So there is no upside to starting a war with Iran, which makes one wonder why so many in Congress and the media appear to favor it. Even the proponents of war concede that a bombing campaign would only delay, not eliminate, any Iranian nuclear weapons program. In the aftermath of the attack, Iran would certainly seek a nuclear weapon to defend itself from further attacks, making the reasoning behind the original bombing somewhat difficult to fathom. Those who seek regime change are also delusional if they think a military assault will change the country’s politics. Quite the contrary. In all likelihood, an attack by Israel or the US would only strengthen the regime. It is quite simply not in America’s national interest to continue down the road to war.

View the original article at Prison Planet

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Alex Jones, conspiracy, Police State, Prison Planet Articles.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php