Skip to content

Questions about 9/11

By Dark Politricks

Yesterday Glenn Beck ambushed Debra Medina by asking her whether she believed the US government was involved in 9/11. Even though she answered the question not by saying that she believed the government was behind the attacks but only that there were some outstanding questions and that the public didn’t know the full facts she has been attacked by the right wing media as a 9/11 Truther conspiracy nut. I don’t see the problem with her answer as she is only telling the truth when there do remain a number of outstanding questions. I would love to know the answers to the following and please if anyone reading this does have the answer to any of the following please let me know.

1. Sibel Edmonds, the most gagged women in US history after 9.11,  said the USA had a close and intimate relationship with Al Qaeda up to 911. What was the nature of this relationship?

2. Who was the last CIA or other intelligence agency staff member to visit or contact Bin Laden before 9.11. What did they speak about? If the rumours of a visit whilst he was in hospital in Dubai are not true then when was the last known contact between the USA and their “ex” asset made.

3. Who chose 9.11 to run the Vigilant Guardian NORAD training exercises involving hijacked planes. When was this date chosen and why.

4. What did Cheney mean in the Pentagon Bunker when he said “the orders still stand” and no effort was made 2 shoot down the incoming plane.

From United States Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta’s testimony to the 9.11 commission referring to the morning of 9.11.

MR. HAMILTON: We thank you for that. I wanted to focus just a moment on the Presidential Emergency Operating Center. You were there for a good part of the day. I think you were there with the vice president. And when you had that order given, I think it was by the president, that authorized the shooting down of commercial aircraft that were suspected to be controlled by terrorists, were you there when that order was given?

MR. MINETA: No, I was not. I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, “The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to, “The plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the vice president, “Do the orders still stand?” And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” Well, at the time I didn’t know what all that meant. And —

MR. MINETA: I didn’t know about the order to shoot down. I arrived at the PEOC at about 9:20 a.m. And the president was in Florida, and I believe he was on his way to Louisiana at that point when the conversation that went on between the vice president and the president and the staff that the president had with him.

MR. ROEMER: So when you arrived at 9:20, how much longer was it before you overheard the conversation between the young man and the vice president saying, “Does the order still stand?”

MR. MINETA: Probably about five or six minutes.

We known there was an order given by the president to shoot down the hijacked planes and from Norman Mineta’s testimony its clear the young man in question was keen that the “order” was carried out however because no attempt was made to shoot down the incoming plane this seems to suggest that the order was actually a stand down order rather than an attack order.

5. What caused Barry Jennings an eye witness survivor from WTC-7 to die just a couple of days before the NIST report on the collapse of that building was released. Barry had been very vocal in his eye witness testimony giving interviews to television channels on the day of the attacks as well as to the pro conspiracy documentary Loose Change in which he talks about explosions occurring within the building and him having to step over dead bodies on his way down the stairs. There was talk that he was going to give an opposing press conference to refute the NIST report and its claims however he was found dead only a few days before the report was released.

6. Were any of the hijackers involved in drug smuggling out of the infamous Venice airport and who knew about this? The airport is a known smuggling route that has apparently been given the “green light” by the CIA and has some very dodgy links with mobsters, cocaine cartels, intelligence agencies and terrorists all of which Daniel Hopsicker has documented in his videos and on his site Madcow Morning News.

7. What is the explanation for the explosive materials & molten metal dust particles found on nearby buildings after the WTC collapse that were found during Deutsche Banks insurance claim.

8. Why are the eye witnesses from the Pentagon believed about the plane but not those from New York who heard and saw explosions go off in the buildings. Numerous Firemen, policemen, first responders, journalists and passers by heard explosions in various parts of the buildings. Were these caused by planted explosives or by something else.

9. Is there truth in the claims that the Pakistan foreign office paid tens of thousands of dollars to lobbyists in the US to get anti-Pakistan references dropped from the 9/11 inquiry commission report.

10. Is there any truth in the allegation that the ex head of the Pakistani ISI ordered the payment of $100,000 to lead hijacker Mohammed Atta. This has been a common claim in the story of 9/11 and if true would suggest a link between rouge elements of at least once intelligence agency and the terrorists in question.

11. Multiple intelligence agencies from around the world knew an attack was planned and told the US. There is also evidence that suggests multiple US agencies knew of plans to attack the states from Al Qaeda infiltrators and intercepted communications. How far up the US government did this knowledge go and what action was taken or deliberately NOT taken for political purposes.

12. Why did the NIST not even consider controlled demolition as a possible cause for the collapse of WTC7. If you are having to carry out a major investigation to find the cause of a buildings collapse then surely all possibilities should be looked at especially as I would hazard a guess that in the majority of cases where tall buildings have collapsed the cause has been controlled demolition. Ruling out a possible cause suggests that they knew the reason for the collapse in the first place or that they had to ensure for other reasons that the collapse was attributed to anything apart from controlled demolition.

Ruling out a possible cause for whatever reason has only lend credence to claims that the NIST report into WTC-7 is politically motivated and had a pre-determined outcome which required a computer model to be designed to deliver said outcome. In fact the computer model the NIST created to “prove” their theory of collapse relies on theoretical parameter values that may or may not bear any relation to the actual parameters of the day.

The NIST WTC-7  collapse theory is one of differing thermal expansion which led to a structural weakening in a core section of the building. The report explains that differences in thermal expansion between the steel beams and the concrete floor slabs was the primary reason for the collapse of the sheer studs that led to the destruction of the building. However in their computer model the NIST did not factor in any heating of the concrete slabs whereas it did for the steel beams. So of course there would have been a difference in the thermal expansion of these two materials as only one was actually being heated within the model! Therefore the only official explanation of the collapse of WTC-7 relies on a biased computer model with loaded parameters that deliver their desired outcome.

13. Why is the US government so against a full independant inquiry into 9/11 from taking place. Their unwillingness to allow a new investigation not only makes them look guilty but leads to claims of a coverup and fuels conspiracy theories. If there is nothing to hide then they have nothing to fear from a new inquiry and it would make a lot of people very happy as well as hopefully answering some questions and maybe lead to some closure on the subject.

Not only do many of the public want a new inquiry but so do many of the families of victims, first responders, engineers, architects, pilots and military members who have fought in the wars that were caused by this attack. The US government held multiple investigations into Pearl Harbour but only one so far into 9/11. This investigation was hampered by non co-operation by the Bush white house and a narrow remit which has led to 6 of the 10 commisioners expressing their concerns publically about the need for a new investigation to duncover the truth.

“I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.. This is not spin. This is not true.” – John Farmer

“One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”. – Max Cleland

“We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting” – Timothy Roemer

So those were just a few of my own questions that I have outstanding about the events of 9/11 and I’m sure that there are many more that need answering. The majority of the US public also believe that there are unanswered questions from that day and it seems Debra Medina is only following the common persons view and therefore doesn’t deserve the kind of treatment she is getting from the hit-men on the right.

As recent articles on this site have shown the label “conspiracy theorist” is banded about like a slur term and we all know that when someone isn’t prepared to debate the facts they attack the messenger. There are many logical and sane reasons to believe in conspiracies and history is littered with them from assassinations to the over throw of governments (Suez, Iran, Iraq, Cuba) all of which our own intelligence agencies have a history of involvement with.

Taking this into consideration then surely its not the conspiracy theorist who should be deried as crazy but the denialist who believes all major events are pure chance with no co-ordination or planning. These people deny historical precedence because it conflicts with their own worldview that powerful people never do bad things and when they do they do them individually rather than colluding with others.

One doesn’t even need to look that far back to see evidence that our leaders are perfectly willing to engage in false flag attacks if they serve a political end such as starting a war. We have Seymour Hersh’s revelations that Dick Cheney wanted to use US boats disguised as Repbulican Guard vessels and start a shoot up in the Straight of Hormuz and blame it on Iran or Tony Blair and George Bush’s plan to shoot down a plane marked in UN colours over Iraq. Both of these false flag attacks were to be used as a pretext for starting a war and even though they never came to fruition just the fact that they were even discussed should be enough to prove to any conspiracy sceptic that false flag attacks happen and that even supposedly civilised democratic nations such as ours are perfectly willing to engage in them if they serve some political purpose.

Therefore the only logical behaviour is to be sceptical of anyone or any group or organisation that has engaged in conspiratal behaviour in the past and always look behind any official story. Just like a judge in court would use a defendants past convictions as a guide to present behaviour we should take with a large pinch of salt any official story especially one that leads to major change and that includes war, new laws being passed, power being transferred from or to a new authority and the loss of liberty, privacy and freedom. 9/11 was one such event that led to all of the above taking place and therefore it merits special attention from anyone who cares about the type of world we live in. When we look at the primary question in regards to 9/11 of “who benefits” we can be sure of two things, its wasn’t the public and it hasn’t been the Muslims of the world.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in conspiracy, False Flag, Investigations & Inquiries.

Tagged with , , , , .

One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. uberVU - social comments linked to this post on February 13, 2010

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by darkpolitricks: New article on darkpolitricks: Questions about 9/11 #News #Politics…

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.


Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?