Skip to content


U.S. Prepares to Leave Iraq, Future Uncertain

If only Karl Rove had pushed back harder at the critics on the lies on Iraq by the White House Iraq Group, Iraq would be a paradise. Ri

The latest from Iraq:

Juan Cole points out Muqtada Calls Voting an Act of Defiance against the US.

Frida Berrigan on Operation New Dawn.

And from Warren P. Strobel of McClatchy Newspapers:

As U.S. prepares to leave after 7 years, Iraq’s future uncertain
By Warren P. Strobel | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — When the Bush administration invaded Iraq seven years ago, it pledged to leave behind a democracy that would be a model for the entire Middle East. Instead, it now appears that the United States will leave behind a big question mark.

Sunday’s parliamentary elections in Iraq will start the clock on the withdrawal of U.S. troops, with 50,000 soldiers remaining in an advisory role after Aug. 31 and all of them gone by the end of 2011, if current plans hold.

The elections are, in a sense, the final act of a U.S.-led invasion that the George W. Bush White House sold on false pretenses — nonexistent weapons of mass destruction, an imaginary nuclear-weapons program and fictional al Qaida ties — and that’s cost nearly 4,400 American lives, at least 100,000 Iraqi ones, as much as $3 trillion and untold politicalcapital.

Senior U.S. officials and top generals, using football terminology, like to speak of the American effort in Iraq as being in the ‘red zone,’ close to the goal line of a reasonably stable and democratic country after years of struggle and sacrifice.

Others who’ve spent significant time in Iraq, however, say that the country’s future, while vastly more hopeful than it was four years ago, is nonetheless still in doubt.

‘This can go either way. And it can go either way for a long time to come,’ said Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad from 2007 to 2009.

Crocker liked to say that the important events of the Iraq war might not have even happened yet. ‘I believed it then. I believe it now,’ he said.

Violence in Iraq is down markedly, but political, ethnic and secular reconciliation has remained elusive. The fault line between Sunni Muslim Arabs and Sunni Kurds still tears at the country’s northern tier. Iraq’s neighbors, particularly Shiite Muslim Iran and Sunni-dominated Saudi Arabia, see it as a potential regional battleground.

The elections, in which 6,200 candidates are vying for 325 parliament seats, will open a months-long effort to form a new government. That path will be strewn with pitfalls and could stretch beyond the self-imposed Aug. 31 U.S. deadline for withdrawing combat brigades.

The situation is so fragile that President Barack Obama is hearing more calls to consider slowing the troop withdrawal if Iraq takes a turn for the worse.

During a recent visit to Washington, Army Gen. Raymond Odierno, the commander of American forces in Iraq, signaled that he might ask Obama to keep one combat brigade, about 3,000 troops, in the powder keg city of Kirkuk, on the Arab-Kurdish fault line, after Sept. 1. If he does need the troops, he’s expected to ask for them this summer, defense officials told McClatchy.

However, Obama, who pledged during his election campaign to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq, appears determined to keep to the schedule no matter what.

‘We see nothing now that affects the plan. We’re on track to move down to 50,000 troops at the end of August and to end the combat mission. And we don’t see anything that will get us off that track,’ a senior administration official, who briefed reporters on White House-imposed conditions of anonymity, said Thursday.

Sometime this spring, there will be more U.S. troops in Afghanistan than there are in Iraq for the first time since March 2003. There are now 96,000 in Iraq and 78,000 in Afghanistan.

A European diplomat, who asked not to be identified because he wasn’t authorized to speak for the record, said the Obama administration was hoping for the quickest possible formation of a new Iraqi government to speed the U.S. withdrawal. By contrast, he said, his government argues that taking more time will be worth it if it helps Iraq’s politicians narrow the country’s deep divides.

Wayne White, the State Department’s principal Iraq analyst from 2003 to 2005, said American influence in Iraq had plummeted — he termed it ‘nil to iffy’ — and that there was little point in extending the U.S. stay.

‘If Humpty Dumpty is going to fall apart . . . there’s very little that the United States is going to be able to do about it,’ White said. What the United States will leave behind ‘is not predictable. But that shouldn’t stop us from expediting our withdrawal.’

This is the first election since 2003 that the Iraqis have organized themselves. The mere fact that Iraq is holding it, with no major sects or ethnic groups boycotting, is little short of a miracle to many current and former officials who lived through the darkest days of sectarian violence from 2005 to 2007.

Political killings have dropped dramatically since the Bush administration belatedly changed course in Iraq in early 2007, adopting a counterinsurgency strategy and sending an additional 20,000 combat troops to Iraq.

It remains to be seen whether those gains will outlast the U.S. military’s stay.

The course change ‘basically salvaged a war that we were on the threshold of losing,’ said Michael O’Hanlon, a scholar at the Washington-based Brookings Institution who initially was skeptical of the troop ‘surge’ but became a leading public proponent.

O’Hanlon said he was now optimistic, but added, ‘I’m not one of these people who’s just jumping from the rooftops these days with joy, because there’s still much that can go awry.’

For that reason, he said, the White House ‘should stay flexible’ and consider keeping troops in Iraq past December 2011. That would mean amending a U.S.-Iraqi status-of-forces agreement.

Even as American combat forces leave, the United States will have to expend more treasure, time and maybe even blood to secure the gains of the last three years.

The remaining 50,000 troops will be in Iraq in an advisory capacity, to train and assist Iraqi security forces, but they ‘are still going to have a combat capability, even if they’re not going to be called ‘combat brigades,’ ‘ O’Hanlon said.

The State Department will assume greater powers in Iraq as the Pentagon transfers responsibilities from soldiers to diplomats and development experts.

‘We need to stay heavily and directly engaged,’ former Ambassador Crocker said. ‘Iraq is going to need that engagement . . . for quite some time to come.’

Brian Katulis of the liberal Center for American Progress said the Iraq war remained ‘a net negative’ for U.S. foreign policy. ‘We’re still trying to take a sad song and make it better,’ he told a panel organized by the conservative American Enterprise Institute.

(Margaret Talev and Nancy A. Youssef contributed to this article.)

This can go either way. And it can go either way for a long time to come,’ said Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador in Baghdad from 2007 to 2009.

Crocker liked to say that the important events of the Iraq war might not have even happened yet. ‘I believed it then. I believe it now,’ he said.

Violence in Iraq is down markedly, but political, ethnic and secular reconciliation has remained elusive. The fault line between Sunni Muslim Arabs and Sunni Kurds still tears at the country’s northern tier. Iraq’s neighbors, particularly Shiite Muslim Iran and Sunni-dominated Saudi Arabia, see it as a potential regional battleground.

The elections, in which 6,200 candidates are vying for 325 parliament seats, will open a months-long effort to form a new government. That path will be strewn with pitfalls and could stretch beyond the self-imposed Aug. 31 U.S. deadline for withdrawing combat brigades.

The situation is so fragile that President Barack Obama is hearing more calls to consider slowing the troop withdrawal if Iraq takes a turn for the worse.

During a recent visit to Washington, Army Gen. Raymond Odierno, the commander of American forces in Iraq, signaled that he might ask Obama to keep one combat brigade, about 3,000 troops, in the powder keg city of Kirkuk, on the Arab-Kurdish fault line, after Sept. 1. If he does need the troops, he’s expected to ask for them this summer, defense officials told McClatchy.

However, Obama, who pledged during his election campaign to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq, appears determined to keep to the schedule no matter what.

‘We see nothing now that affects the plan. We’re on track to move down to 50,000 troops at the end of August and to end the combat mission. And we don’t see anything that will get us off that track,’ a senior administration official, who briefed reporters on White House-imposed conditions of anonymity, said Thursday.

Sometime this spring, there will be more U.S. troops in Afghanistan than there are in Iraq for the first time since March 2003. There are now 96,000 in Iraq and 78,000 in Afghanistan.

A European diplomat, who asked not to be identified because he wasn’t authorized to speak for the record, said the Obama administration was hoping for the quickest possible formation of a new Iraqi government to speed the U.S. withdrawal. By contrast, he said, his government argues that taking more time will be worth it if it helps Iraq’s politicians narrow the country’s deep divides.

Wayne White, the State Department’s principal Iraq analyst from 2003 to 2005, said American influence in Iraq had plummeted — he termed it ‘nil to iffy’ — and that there was little point in extending the U.S. stay.

‘If Humpty Dumpty is going to fall apart . . . there’s very little that the United States is going to be able to do about it,’ White said. What the United States will leave behind ‘is not predictable. But that shouldn’t stop us from expediting our withdrawal.’

This is the first election since 2003 that the Iraqis have organized themselves. The mere fact that Iraq is holding it, with no major sects or ethnic groups boycotting, is little short of a miracle to many current and former officials who lived through the darkest days of sectarian violence from 2005 to 2007.

Political killings have dropped dramatically since the Bush administration belatedly changed course in Iraq in early 2007, adopting a counterinsurgency strategy and sending an additional 20,000 combat troops to Iraq.

It remains to be seen whether those gains will outlast the U.S. military’s stay.

The course change ‘basically salvaged a war that we were on the threshold of losing,’ said Michael O’Hanlon, a scholar at the Washington-based Brookings Institution who initially was skeptical of the troop ‘surge’ but became a leading public proponent.

O’Hanlon said he was now optimistic, but added, ‘I’m not one of these people who’s just jumping from the rooftops these days with joy, because there’s still much that can go awry.’

For that reason, he said, the White House ‘should stay flexible’ and consider keeping troops in Iraq past December 2011. That would mean amending a U.S.-Iraqi status-of-forces agreement.

Even as American combat forces leave, the United States will have to expend more treasure, time and maybe even blood to secure the gains of the last three years.

The remaining 50,000 troops will be in Iraq in an advisory capacity, to train and assist Iraqi security forces, but they ‘are still going to have a combat capability, even if they’re not going to be called ‘combat brigades,’ ‘ O’Hanlon said.

The State Department will assume greater powers in Iraq as the Pentagon transfers responsibilities from soldiers to diplomats and development experts.

‘We need to stay heavily and directly engaged,’ former Ambassador Crocker said. ‘Iraq is going to need that engagement . . . for quite some time to come.’

Brian Katulis of the liberal Center for American Progress said the Iraq war remained ‘a net negative’ for U.S. foreign policy. ‘We’re still trying to take a sad song and make it better,’ he told a panel organized by the conservative American Enterprise Institute.

(Margaret Talev and Nancy A. Youssef contributed to this article.)

View the original article at Veterans Today

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Uncategorized.

Tagged with , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php