Skip to content


Fútbol Arte v. Anti-Fútbol

Harry Browne
Counterpunch
Thursday, June 17, 2010

We hear it every four years: the World Cup hasn’t really begun until we see Brazil come out and play their inimitable brand of samba soccer.

On such terms, this World Cup has yet to begin. In truth, if we take it literally, we haven’t really had a World Cup begin in at least 20 years. Brazilian football’s unique selling point, the ‘brand’ that allows random Brazilians to set up ‘samba soccer’ summer-schools across the Western world, bears hardly any resemblance to how the national ‘seleção’ actually plays.

Apart from Robinho’s charming but repetitive tendency to indulge in fancy step-overs, Brazil couldn’t even turn on the style on Tuesday against a dogged but extremely limited North Korean team. Even leaving that country’s regime aside, the notion of breeding a powerful soccer squad in the isolation of Pyongyang goes against the cosmopolitan, miscegenating spirit of football — North Korea’s best players were two who live and play abroad.

But Brazil won, which is what the game, as opposed to the art, demands — even as fans back home and around the world wept for the missing art. And by playing a cautious game against one of the tournament’s weakest teams, they got in some practice for the tougher tests ahead. All over the field, Brazil seemed to want to emphasize that they are bigger, stronger, faster, rather than more beautiful, than the opposition. It was merely a happy accident that the biggest, strongest, fastest man in the game, Brazil’s incredible right-back Maicon, also contributed a beautiful goal.

In South America, in particular, there has been for at least half-a-century a debate between football’s romantics and its pragmatists, sometimes expressed as fútbol arte vs anti-fútbol. It is not, strictly speaking, a Left versus Right debate: in the early days of the argument, especially, there were plenty of political left-wingers who advocated the rigorous collective endeavor and frequent success of essentially negative soccer. But it seems to me that the occasional romanticism of the New Left, alllied to specific teams such as the almost-hippyish, ultra-democratic Dutch club and national sides of the Seventies, left the argument with, at least, a political coloration for the last 40 years. This version of the divide is also sustained by fútbol arte’s decline in international soccer at the same time as the game has become a commercial plaything of TV multinationals and corporate sponsors.

So it feels like no mere coincidence that football’s leading anti-imperialist, Diego Maradona, is also in this World Cup one of its leading advocates of artistic football. (The fact that he is treated like a crazy outsider by the soccer establishment makes him all the more endearing.) There is some historical irony in this, since Argentine clubs and coaches were notorious pioneers of anti-fútbol. While it would be wrong at this early stage to identify 2010’s Brazil with the tag — there are plenty of teams more deserving of being called anti-fútbol at this tournament — it is something of a twist for fans of a certain vintage to be supporting Argentina over Brazil because of the high style of the Argentines’ play.

Argentina’s style remained pretty high on Thursday in their second game, when they eventually hammered a very good South Korean team, 4-1. Among the positive signs were the sparkling performance of Carlos Tevez, the fact that previously misfiring striker Gonzalo Higuaín made his mark, and the sound of the Argentine fans outsinging the vuvuzelas. More worrying was the injury to defender Walter Samuel, probably the only really solid link in the wonky chain that the Argentines call a defense: the result was the whole team turning nervous for much of the second half.

The last time Argentina went to the World Cup playing something like fútbol arte was in 2002, with their obsessive coach Marcelo Bielsa (from a prominent Perónist family) trying to marry technocratic detail with ‘the way the game should be played’. The team, full of talent, failed utterly. This year Bielsa is managing Chile, whose performance against Honduras was one of the most joyously entertaining of this tournament so far. It was merely Honduras, but you can only play against the opponent placed before you, and Chile fearlessly attacked the game as few other teams have done in this World Cup. The surprise, and the worry, was that they scored only one goal.

Still, that’s one goal more than Spain managed, as they were defeated 1-0 by Switzerland on Wednesday. If the Swiss can fairly be accused of anti-fútbol — though you might not blame them, against the European champions and pre-tournament favorites — then the Spanish embodied the deficiencies of fútbol arte. With two-thirds of the possession, the Spanish seemed to think a goal would inevitably come as a consequence of their essential superiority. Instead, their defenders’ complacency allowed Switzerland in for a goal amidst a veritable ballet of tumbling bodies, and their attackers didn’t rise to the standards expected of them. Spain were insufficiently beautiful, maybe; insufficiently effective, for sure. (Given that Spain usually start brilliantly in tournaments before a knock-out phase collapse, maybe straw-clutchers can take their defeat as a good omen.)

In any case, aesthetic politics can take you, as a fan, only so far. Take, for example, Portugal’s Cristiano Ronaldo. He is unquestionably a beautiful man — as that nearly nude Vanity Fair cover illustrates — and a footballer of enormous elegance on the field. His long-range shot against Ivory Coast would have been a strong early contender for goal of the tournament if it had bounced into the goal off the post instead of bouncing away. And yet he is one of the least-loved greats in world soccer, partly because of the unlovable clubs he has played for, but mostly because of his petulance and tendency to dive to the ground in order to win free-kicks and get defenders in trouble. He also tends to fade in adversity. It is easy to imagine that the Uruguayan referee of Tuesday’s game has, like hundreds of millions of fans around the world, cursed at his TV when watching Ronaldo. The result: Ronaldo got an undeserved yellow-card from the ref, seemingly based more on his reputation than his actions. And most of us watching were probably pleased about the karma of the injustice.

Portugal’s opponents in that scoreless game, Ivory Coast, made few appeals to our artistic sensibilities. The way Ivory Coast finished the game, killing time instead of going for a winning goal, was infuriating for more than aesthetic reasons. If their Group of Death ends, as well it might, with Portugal and Brazil playing out a convenient draw that sends them both through and eliminates Ivory Coast, the Africans will have only themselves (and their rather vacuously pragmatic manager, Sven Goran Eriksson) to blame. Ivory Coast were better than Portugal, but didn’t make sure the scoreboard reflected that fact.

The European capital of anti-fútbol has tended to be Italy, and Italians have rarely made any bones about it. Evidence of the Italian devotion to pragmatism that borders on cynicism, and often crosses the border, is that they have a special and slightly condescending name for the unpredictable, creative footballer — they call him a fantasista. Implied in the terminology is that there is room for only one such player, at most, in each team. The current Italian team has none at all. Their proverbial slow start, with a 1-1 draw against Paraguay, means those South Americans now have a great chance of progressing, though Paraguay were no great shakes against Italy.

It has nonetheless been an exceptionally good tournament so far for South Americans. Alongside Paraguay’s creditable result against the defending champions Italy, the other four South American nations — comprising the cone of the continent, with Brazil the ice-cream on top — have all won games. Uruguay, their reputation for cynicism preceding them, were unpopular 3-0 winners against the hosts on Wednesday, but they had outplayed South Africa thoroughly, occasionally even beautifully with Diego Forlan as a quasi-fantasista, even before they got an unwarranted gift from the referee.

European teams, on the other hand, have started sluggishly: with 13 European countries in South Africa, the only European winners of any games as of Thursday afternoon have been the minnows Slovenia, Germany, plus the Dutch and Swiss — the latter two each beating other European teams.

Ghana apart, the tournament has been a disappointment, nearing disaster, for African teams. As their failure comes into focus over the coming days, the chances of serious discontent among South Africans about the corruption and waste of the World Cup must surely rise; already there has been labor unrest among underpaid stewards. The fact that police saw fit to attack, eject and arrest a group of pretty women for their part in a stadium beer-marketing stunt — for a non-Official-World-Cup brand, of course — shows again the warped priorities of FIFA and the South African organizing committee.

Earlier this week I wondered here in CounterPunch which team we unattached and promiscuous fans should root for, for “political or moral reasons”. I took some criticism from readers for answering this question largely in terms of how well teams were playing. Wouldn’t we be better off asking which countries we actually like, in terms of foreign policy, social justice, treatment of poor people and immigrants etc, and then rooting for them? I say No — not only because a country’s football team is not the same as its state, its government or its society, though it has interesting and complex relationships to all of these things; not only because you could end up supporting lousy teams, if you can find any to support at all; but because in football so much interesting morality and politics happen on the playing field. While it’s natural to feel an itch against England because of, say, BP’s destruction of the Gulf of Mexico, it is most satisfying to scratch that itch for 90 minutes with observations about the bureaucratic, anti-fútbol inelegance of their soccer.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Politics.

Tagged with , , , , , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php