Skip to content


Goldman Tells Clients To Ignore “Controversial” Bad News, Sees 1.6% (Precisely) Recession Chance

Tyler Durden
Zero Hedge
Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Goldman outdoes itself again. After Jan Hatzius has been banging the economic slowdown drums for days now, the firm’s other prominent economist Andrew Tilton is out with a new report “Recession Forecast Models Back in Vogue”, according to which the firm plugged in a few numbers into an overclocked iMac (appropriately equipped with the No Recession Ever ap), asked if there will be a recession, and the result was, stunning, “no way in hell.” Most hilariously, the report contains the following stunner: “Typical recession forecasting models estimate a near-zero likelihood that the economy has entered recession again, or that it will in the near future… The best news first: the model shows essentially zero probability that the economy is currently in recession.  Payrolls have generally been expanding in recent months and the unemployment rate has actually come down slightly.  This is unlikely to be a controversial conclusion for most market participants and so we will not dwell on it further.” In other words, because everyone knows that there is really no trouble in the jobless arena, aside from some rumblings in the periphery that the real unemployment rate is, oh, 16.5%, Goldman sees no need to discuss this data point, as it is really completely irrelevant. Oh yes, and the model refs out if you assume in negative input. Moody’s coupled with a dash of European stress tests anyone?

Andrew Tilton’s complete joke of a report below:

Last week’s thoroughly disappointing macro data set prompted many market participants to wonder anew about the risk of a “double dip” in coming months.  One way to answer this question is via a quantitative “recession probability” model.

Typical recession forecasting models estimate a near-zero likelihood that the economy has entered recession again, or that it will in the near future. But they suffer from a serious bias: most models use the slope of the yield curve as a forecasting variable, with a flat or inverted curve a classic warning sign of a slowdown or recession.  In the current environment of near-zero short-term rates, the yield curve must always have a positive slope, which normally implies a decent growth outlook and therefore leads such models to benign conclusions.
A forecasting model which leaves out the yield curve variable—reducing its accuracy under normal circumstances somewhat—and also adjusts for employment-related distortions currently estimates roughly a one-in-four probability that the economy will be in recession six months from now.  However, we would not place too much weight on any one model, as it is difficult to capture idiosyncratic factors (such as the impending fade-out of fiscal stimulus or the risk of heightened concerns about sovereign debt sustainability) in a model estimated on the last 40 years of US data.

Last week’s macro data set was thoroughly disappointing, including worse-than-expected readings on the two most important monthly economic indicators: the ISM manufacturing index and the employment report.  The ISM index dropped 3½ points and featured a seven-point decline in the “new orders” component, which has the most predictive power for future industrial activity.  As for the employment report, private-sector payrolls grew by only 83,000—less than needed to keep up with population growth over the long term—and the workweek shortened.  The unemployment rate declined to 9.5%, but only because a large number of people gave up looking actively for work; the overall employment-to-population ratio has moved halfway back to its late-2009 lows.

These disappointments have prompted many market participants to ask anew about the possibility of a “double dip” in the economy.  We interpret this below as the probability that the economy re-enters recession, roughly defined as two or more consecutive quarters of contracting real GDP.  (Conversations with clients suggest that some refer to any significant renewed slowdown as a “double dip,” even if it does not qualify as a full-blown recession.)  To provide some perspective on this question, we have dusted off a recession forecasting model that we employed in 2007-2008 (see “Recession Forecasting Models Flashing Yellow,” US Economics Analyst 07/39, September 28, 2007).

Our recession forecasting model contains the following variables: the slope of the yield curve (10-year vs 3-month Treasury yields), the recent change in the unemployment rate, nonfarm payroll growth, the recent change in equity prices, the year-over-year change in housing starts, and the ISM manufacturing index.  Generally, the labor market variables tend to be more significant as the forecasting horizon shortens, while the slope of the yield curve is the best predictor of a recession six to twelve months out.  Although versions of the model were calibrated to forecast recessions at different horizons, we focus here on a) the probability that the economy is currently in recession, and b) the probability that the economy will be in recession six months from now.  We estimate the model over the period from 1970 through mid-2009 using real-time rather than revised data (some adjusted versions, discussed below, begin in the late 1970s due to data availability).

The best news first: the model shows essentially zero probability that the economy is currently in recession.  Payrolls have generally been expanding in recent months and the unemployment rate has actually come down slightly.  This is unlikely to be a controversial conclusion for most market participants and so we will not dwell on it further.

More surprisingly, the model also shows a very low probability (1.6%) that the economy will be in recession six months from now.  Why so low?  The aforementioned labor market variables are one reason, but another important one is the positively sloped yield curve.  As the yield curve embeds expectations of future Fed policy, a flat or negatively sloped curve is a sign that the market sees Fed easing as likely—a classic sign of a slowing economy.

The problem, of course, is that the yield curve must be positively sloped in an environment of near-zero short-term interest rates.  Even if the market views the growth outlook as terrible, the Fed cannot cut rates, so risks to future short-term rates are one-sided.  In normal times, the current positively-sloped yield curve would imply a decent growth outlook, but this is clearly misleading.   It would be nice to find another yield-related variable without this bias, but none we have tried are nearly as significant.  Still, we can gain a sense of how important the bias may be—at the price of a moderate loss in accuracy under normal circumstances—by simply removing this variable from the model.  Doing so raises the six-month recession probability to 8.6%.

The employment-related variables in the model also suffer from some distortions at present.  Because of short-term Census hiring, nonfarm employment posted large gains through May and declined in June.  Private-sector payroll growth provides a less noisy barometer of underlying job market trends at the moment.  Another issue concerns the unemployment rate; because a large number of people have left the labor force (more than a million over the past year), it may not reflect the full extent of labor market weakness.  An alternative is the employment-to-population ratio.  Substituting these variables in our original model (with the yield curve) gives a recession probability of 6.1%.  So far, not so bad, but if we combine the yield curve adjustment and the employment-related adjustments, the model generates a 23.9% probability that the US economy will be in recession in six months’ time.  In other words, it suggests recession is not a base case, but is clearly more than just a tail risk.

Lest any reader take these forecasts too literally, we hasten to emphasize that any quantitative model can only capture a subset of the potential factors that could push the economy into recession—or keep it growing at a healthy pace.  The substantial changes in probability just from the changes discussed above illustrate the potential instability in models and the need for robust quantitative and qualitative analysis.  Our subjective assessment of recession probability leans to the high side of the model results.  This is partly because the model focuses on a fixed six-month horizon; the probability will naturally be higher over longer horizons.  In the current episode, the fade-out of fiscal stimulus, the wind-down of the inventory cycle, and the risk that sovereign default concerns further tighten financial conditions are all reasons for concern—but these are difficult to include in a quantitative model that covers only the last 40 years of US economic data.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Finance & Economics.

Tagged with , , , , , .


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?



css.php