Skip to content

September Clues and the No Planes conspiracy theory

September Clues and the No Planes conspiracy theory

By Dark Politricks

Updated – Please see comments at the bottom

I have never been an active proponent of the “no planes” theory when it comes to 9/11 having tried to contain my questioning to those events that:

a) are easily demonstrable as being false or illogical and,

b) are not too far out there in terms of what someone with little knowledge of the subject would regard.

The reason being that it is very hard to convince someone who still believes the official story anyway and I would rather get them to question the obvious problems without putting them off by sounding far fetched. I would rather have the following questions answered than spend my time debating whether it’s possible or not to stage or manipulate every possible video and camera that caught footage of the planes hitting the buildings. Questions such as:

Why did the three World Trade Center buildings all collapse so quickly. They were all owned by the same person who received a massive insurance payout and who was filmed in a documentary saying he wanted to “Pull building 7”.

Now there has been much debate over whether this meant he wanted to bring it down by demolition or by wires but he did want to bring the building down and a recent hit piece on Jesse Ventura by a Fox News reporter who was at the scene on the day actually backed up Silverstein’s desire to pull the building by admitting he knew Larry had been on the phone to his insurance company trying to get permission to demolish the building. These were the only 3 tall steel framed skyscrapers to collapse from fire in history and they all happened on the same day to the same owner. Very unlucky indeed.

Apart from the obvious misfortune of having a record breaking day in having a mile and a half’s worth of building collapse in a few hours there is the problem of physics in that building seven, the one building that collapsed that hadn’t had a plane hit it, collapsed so quickly that there is a demonstrable 2.4 second period where the collapse was at free fall speed. The laws of physics dictate that this is impossible unless some kind of demolition had taken place to evenly remove the supporting columns at the exact same time around the building.

The NIST report into building sevens collapse claimed fire and thermal expansion was the cause of collapse and they initially claimed their report was consistent with the laws of physics.

However once the 9/11 community and a high school physics teacher proved that the 2.4 second free-fall descent had occurred NIST conceded the point and promptly removed that claim from their report. Therefore the only report into the collapse of this building relies on science that has no grounding in fact and relies on physics that wouldn’t be taught in a high school classroom.

It’s a hard choice for those who believe the official story to make and one they will avoid like the plague preferring to call us conspiracy theorists rather than try to explain their own delusions and religious like belief in the impossible and implausible.

Then there is the Pentagon attack. An attack that has not been recorded on any publicly available media for posterity and the only video that exists is from CCTV and shows a blur, a flash and an explosion but no Boeing 737. The problem with the Pentagon attack is that we are expected to believe that a plane the size of this large airliner managed to fly 20 feet above the ground at a speed of 400mph for some considerable time knocking over telegraph poles, managing to not blow the grass beneath it to kingdom come and then disappearing into the walls of the Pentagon to never be seen again.

Not only do many pilots believe this is impossible they also have not managed to replicate this feat on flight simulators therefore we are being asked to believe that a the hijacking pilots were able to carry out manoeuvres that the best of the US air-force cannot achieve themselves.

We know from the Pilots who trained the hijackers how utterly incompetent and useless at flying they were as most of them were never even allowed near a small Cessna. This is not to say it didn’t happen just that many pilots believe it didn’t and without some documentary evidence questions will remain.

However the main problem for me apart from these points is that we are expected to believe that the whole US Intelligence apparatus had no clue that this attack was planned despite all the warnings from foreign countries, their own informers and agents within al-Qaeda and the Able Danger intelligence program that had already identified Mohammed Atta as a potential threat over a year before the attacks had occurred. Therefore we are asked to believe that the biggest intelligence apparatus in history failed so completely and so utterly and yet those people in charge of it were actually promoted rather than discharged and punished. Odd isn’t it?

Not only is there evidence that the American intelligence community knew the attacks were planned and allowed them for political purposes we also have evidence of foreign involvement in the attacks and not from Iran or Iraq but from a supposed friend aka Israel.

Many people across the Muslim world believe the attacks were an Israeli plot to bring the USA into their war against Islam and whether or not this is true it’s certainly what has happened since. The question is whether any evidence supports it and undoubtedly there are some key pieces of the puzzle that point in Israels direction.

The first piece of evidence is the dancing Israelis who were arrested on the morning of September 11th after a witness had seen them dancing and high fiving as the the WTC burned with cameras setup recording the attack. These Israelis were detained for some considerable time before being deported and on an Israeli TV show they admitted to having been sent to “document the event”.

Document what event, you might ask.

How did they know the attacks were going to happen unless they either had knowledge or were involved in some way?

Well another piece of evidence suggests just that as during the year leading up to the attacks Israel was engaged in a massive intelligence gathering operation within the USA.

Posing as art students. the spies were trying to access government buildings, document facilities and steal information from across the country. The troubling aspect of this operation is that the locations of a number of the spy rings correlated to the locations of the supposed 9/11 hijackers including the ringleader Mohammed Atta.

The question that needs to be answered is whether the Israelis were monitoring or helping Atta and his cohorts. As a supposed ally you should have at least expected the Israelis to have informed it’s friend the USA of it’s intimate knowledge of the Arab terrorists in its midst therefore the question is why didn’t they OR if they did why didn’t the US act on this intelligence.

As you can see there are a number of troubling questions that raise many uncomfortable problems for the official conspiracy theory without even going into the realm of some of the other theories which many including myself have found to be far fetched up until now.

The No Planes theory regarding the World Trade Centre attacks always seemed one of those theories that would have been just too hard to pull off without a number of mistakes or a leak somehow and up until now I have been firmly in the camp of those who believe certain sections of the US government knew the attacks were going to happen and then ensured they did for political purposes. There would have just been far too many witnesses on the ground who would see the planes hit the buildings for there not to be any planes at all.

As with most intel operations plausible deniability is the key aspect and I always believed that there was no point in carrying out the attacks yourself when you could just ensure that the plans of your enemies came to fruition on their own (with a little behind the scenes help of course).

However the following two videos which I have just recently watched have raised a number of important questions which must be answered by those who are still following the official events of the day:

The FOX news clip from the morning of the attacks in which the camera does a 3 stage zoom in on the twin towers before the second plane appears from the right and hits the tower. When the tape is rewound the plane is nowhere to be seen as it should have if it were a real clip. Was the plane inserted into the footage?

All of the major TV stations footage seems to be from the same stock. The same shots and audio are used the only main difference is the colouring of the footage. Even the various privately shot footage of the attacks seems to come from a shared stock of imagery that the producer of the video shows has had a lot of editing and image tampering.

The nose in, nose out shot is particularly disturbing and seems to suggest video manipulation. The shape of the nose from the plane is the exact same shape as when it entered the other side of the building (100% exact) which seems to be impossible when one considers how much damage would have occurred. The other troubling point is that the footage cuts out for a second as if someone had realised their mistake before cutting back in.

The number of eye witnesses who saw a plane hit the building is surprisingly low and the majority of those that did claim to see an American Airline 737 hit were all media professionals working for the big TV companies. Other witnesses claimed to see a missile hit, a small plane or a type of plane they had never witnessed before.

Also when a plane, which is made from lightweight metals, hits a re-enforced concrete wall, as this video of a test the US did to show what would happen when a Jet flying at 500mph (the same speed the planes supposedly hit the first floor of the Pentagon), hit a nuclear power station, the plane crumbles into dust. It does not go into the building and manage to either puncture 3 rings of hardened walls as we are expected to believe at the Pentagon OR as in the World Trade Centre, go in one side of the building and pop out the other. If a plane hit either of these buildings it surely would crumble up on the outside of the building not easily slice through the steel or concrete as the videos we have been shown suggests.

You can watch what happens when a plane flying at the same speed of the 9.11 hijacked planes hits a concrete wall. It is “atomised” as the commentator says.

Whilst I am still not a believer of the no plane theory these videos do raise some questions that demand answering and I would love to hear some more views (especially opposing views) that try to explain these oddities.

I have no doubt at all that the modern US media is and has been for some time controlled by a powerful elite and technology is such that a deception on such a scale is possible. COINTELPRO and Operation Mockingbird have ensured that all the major US news stations have been filled with CIA stooges for decades but would they have the technology in 2001 to fake so many videos. If they all came from a central source, maybe, but what about all the videos that came out later from the public, some years later. How were they faked unless controlled by agencies of the state as well?

The problem with such a theory as with all conspiracies is the amount of people that would need to be kept quiet for the ruse to be maintained.

Whilst false flag conspiracies that involve intelligence agencies are committed all the time once you start involving non military personnel such as TV crew members, producers, presenters and so on you would massively increase the risk of a leak. Therefore whilst I admit these theories raise some important questions I am keeping an open mind on this aspect of the 9/11 story. However I would recommend that you watch both these videos and spread the link whether you believe in the official story or not.

Updated: Sep 11th 2010

I have been looking for some answers to the questions I wanted answering regarding the no planes theory and I have managed to find some good videos that look at and seem to explain fully the issues about the plane not being in the Fox news TV footage when the camera zoomed back.

This video discusses the nose in, nose out clip.

Seems to explain quite rationally and in detail why the no planes theory is basically a crock of shit and probably a ploy to discredit the whole 911 truth movement.

Instead of debating with people whether planes actually hit the WTC or whether a directed energy beam or mini nuke destroyed the building we should be asking physicists and engineers to explain how WTC7 could fall at freefall speeds without a controlled demolition of some kind.

This is not to say it’s not possible, I have seen the Judy Wood / Jesse Ventura videos of the dark haired scientist using a directed energy beam to bend and twist meta and literally make steel balls hover in the air using supposed Nikola Tesla techniques. I am also 100% sure our establishment has weapons beyond our imagination.

I am sure directed energy beam weapons exist and evidence from the burned bodies of victims in Iraq seem to suggest some very weird weapons have been used to fry people from the inside out during that war.

However I just believe that at the moment the very important issue of WTC-7 has not been explained, and until it has, one of the most important question over the days events remains unanswered. It is also one of the questions that will get new people interested in the subject of 9.11 and asking questions about this “3rd building”, that still many people haven’t even heard about. Even now a decade later I can mention at work the 3rd building that fell on 9.11 and people will not even know it happened!

So when we ignore the fact that plane parts were found at the scene and thousands of New Yorkers saw the planes hit the towers it will just continue to ensure that anyone asking legitimate questions about 9.11 will be laughed at as tin foil hat wearing conspiracy loons.

This is not what we want when we need to bring the perpetrators to justice and prove what happened on that day seeing that Bush government did everything in it’s power to under fund, hide evidence from and play games with the official 9.11 enquiry that they didn’t even want to hold until public pressure made them.

And we all know what a whitewash that was when the testimony of people like Norman Mineta, Operation ABLE DANGER, and witnesses of explosions in the buildings was left out of the report. That’s not even to mention the supposed Saudi who looked after some of the hijackers, and was hid from the commission by the FBI who never testified despite the commission ordering him to appear.

So to talk about no planes is to discredit any discussion of the 9.11 attacks and we definitely don’t need that.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, conspiracy, Dark Politricks Articles, False Flag, Television Video & Film, War on terror.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , .

4 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Tweets that mention September Clues and the No Planes conspiracy theory | Dark Politricks -- linked to this post on August 16, 2010

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dark Politricks RT and Hot to Spot, DarkPolitricks. DarkPolitricks said: New article on darkpolitricks: September Clues and the No Planes conspiracy theory #911 #NoPlanes #Conspiracy #Video […]

  2. | Dark Politricks linked to this post on October 21, 2010

    […] some of the more far fetched theories surrounding 9.11 such as the “no planes” theory which would have involved hundreds of people including many civillians in the media being in on the […]

  3. 9.11 sceptics versus logic, reason and scientific principles | Dark Politricks linked to this post on October 23, 2010

    […] some of the more far fetched theories surrounding 9.11 such as the “no planes” theory which would have involved hundreds of people including many civilians in the media being in on the […]

  4. 9.11 skeptics versus logic, reason and scientific principles linked to this post on January 5, 2012

    […] some of the more far fetched theories surrounding 9.11 such as the “no planes” theory which would have involved hundreds of people including many civilians in the media being in on the […]

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.


Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?