Skip to content


The U.S. Democracy Needs to Join the 21st Century Global Competition

Voting for U.S. President Still Stuck in the 1800′s

Americans Unable to Compete  in a Democrazy

Recently, I watched a trailer for upcoming documentary called “Gerrymandering”.   Making it’s world premier at the Tribeca Film Festival this year, this bi-partisan sharp documentary convincingly argues that the shady process of gerrymandering (politicians carving up districts in order to maintain power) makes a mockery of democracy—with confirmation from both sides of the political divide. Somehow, out of all that depressing news comes an exceptionally entertaining film and gives us a wake up call.

This movie exposes the hidden history of our country’s redistricting wars, mapping battles that take place out of public scrutiny but that shape the electoral landscape of American politics for decades at time, posing a threat not just to democrats and republicans, but democracy as a whole.

And so it got me thinking. What’s wrong with our election processes?   

In a new world with modern commications, why do we still have an all of this pathetic antiquated systems?  And what the heck is an Electoral College?  Why do we use it?  Why is America still living in the past and not using our technology to be leaders in the 21st century? 

I mean from this ridiculous gerrymandering thing to the antiquated Electoral College process, why must we Americans who basically invented the friggin’ internet have to put up with all of this garbage?  Its’ very strange.

With no professors and very few cheerleaders, the Electoral College is one of the most obscure colleges in America. But it has complete control over who leads the most powerful nation in the world. It’s the Electoral College, which reemerged from obscurity to play a pivotal role in the selection of the George W. Bush, 43rd President.

Vote Democracy DemocrazyHaving an 1800′s pony-express era system when TV’s American Idol is voting instantly for it’s winners seems very strange as if we’re democrtically living in the 1800′s while the rest of the world is competing in this new century.  The Electoral College, in this age, makes no cents and is insulting to every American who votes. 

You know this is century-old debate over whether the Electoral Cllege should go to the scrap heap or not is a very strong reminder that we’ve lost our ability to compete in the 21st Century and that we truly need a paradigm shift in thinking if we are going to be a world leader once again. 

The world is NOT flat and the earth is NOT the center of the universe.   We’ve finally figured these things out so why have a rickety institution that has thrice made a popular-vote loser the President? Unabashedly elitist and wretchedly old skool, the Electoral College was created by the founding fathers in 1787 as a counterbalance against too much democracy and to protect states from encroaching federal power.  But that was over 200 years ago when they used whale oil to light up their night lamps and thought the moon was made of cheese.  Come on people! 

Here’s how the Electoral College supposedly works, or as I say, dysfunctions;

Each state gets a number of electoral votes equal to its total representation in the House and Senate. So a state like California, with 52 House members and 2 senators, gets 54 electoral votes. The problem? Small- and midsize states have a louder voice in selecting a President. For instance, the 22 smallest states together have less than California’s population but nearly twice as many electoral votes. To win, a candidate must take 270 of the 538 electoral votes.

The Electoral College  system is an 18th century anachronism.  Just a few thousand votes can swing the Electoral College one way or another.  That’s not right, not in today’s America.

Indeed, there have been periodic crusades to abolish the Electoral College. But they failed to win much support from many states.  They say that if the Electoral College were abolished, candidates would have little incentive to visit less populated states.   They say Nominees would concentrate on big cities and population states, mainly in the Northeast and California. Their time would be better spent in places like New York City. As a result, the college keeps us from having a regional Presidency.

But that’s B.S. in the modern world.  With TV, Internet, Satellites, etc… don’t pull that silly card.  Come’ on!  This is no country for old men.  Put away those 6 shooters, round up the cows, and come home with me here.  Get with it people!

Yeah, I know, keeping the status quo has it backers from powerful interests such as farmers and gun-rights groups. Because of their concentration in such less populated, rural places, it magnifies their power in swing states like Iowa and Tennessee.  But we’re talking democracy for America, not just for Iowa!

What’s more, both parties back the Electoral College.  Why?  Because of the winner-take-all-aspect of almost every state’s electoral votes, third parties don’t stand a chance.  As some of you will remember, back in 1992, Ross Perot received 19% of the popular vote but did not get a single electoral vote.   That’s rank!  How does this encourage democracy?   Discouraging competition seems Un-American doesn’t it?

To repeal the Electoral College system would require a constitutional amendment passed.  So maybe I am dreaming of a new America that lives in the 21st century while the old blue and brown suits/skirts in Washington continue to hold on to the 20th century past and so goes the rub. 

But in today’s modern world of Blackberry’s, Iphones with men like Steve Jobs and innovators like that guy from Facebook and Simon Fuller from American Idol, why can’t we just simply vote direct with the winner take all.  Heck, make Simon Fuller head of voting and he’ll fix this whole darn thing in one episode!   Yeah, maybe we can get Steve Tyler, Jennifer Lopez, and Randy Jackson to host election night.  Seems to me that would have more integrity then this garbage we have to endure.

Voting direct for our President would be pure democracy instead of this democrazy!  Period!  Ya Think?

2010 Copyright – Johnny Punish – JohnnyPunish.com

View the original article at Veterans Today

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Internet, Politics, Television Video & Film.

Tagged with , , , , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. Or if you need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install and other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. toto says

    The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

    Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections. Elections wouldn’t be about winning states. No more distorting and divisive red and blue state maps. Every vote would be counted for and directly assist the candidate for whom it was cast. Candidates would need to care about voters across the nation, not just undecided voters in a handful of swing states.

    Now 2/3rds of the states and voters are ignored — 19 of the 22 smallest and medium-small states, and big states like California, Georgia, New York, and Texas. The current winner-take-all laws (i.e., awarding all of a state’s electoral votes to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in each state) used by 48 of the 50 states, and not mentioned, much less endorsed, in the Constitution, ensure that the candidates do not reach out to all of the states and their voters. Candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, campaign, or care about the voter concerns in the dozens of states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind. Policies important to the citizens of ‘flyover’ states are not as highly prioritized as policies important to ‘battleground’ states when it comes to governing.

    The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes–that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

    The bill uses the power given to each state by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution to change how they award their electoral votes for president. It does not abolish the Electoral College, which would need a constitutional amendment, and could be stopped by states with as little as 3% of the U.S. population. Historically, virtually all of the major changes in the method of electing the President, including ending the requirement that only men who owned substantial property could vote and 48 current state-by-state winner-take-all laws, have come about by state legislative action.

    The bill has been endorsed or voted for by 1,922 state legislators (in 50 states) who have sponsored and/or cast recorded votes in favor of the bill.

    In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a state’s electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state (with about 70% opposed and about 10% undecided). The recent Washington Post, Kaiser Family Foundation, and Harvard University poll shows 72% support for direct nationwide election of the President. Support for a national popular vote is strong in virtually every state, partisan, and demographic group surveyed in recent polls in closely divided battleground states: Colorado– 68%, Iowa –75%, Michigan– 73%, Missouri– 70%, New Hampshire– 69%, Nevada– 72%, New Mexico– 76%, North Carolina– 74%, Ohio– 70%, Pennsylvania — 78%, Virginia — 74%, and Wisconsin — 71%; in smaller states (3 to 5 electoral votes): Alaska — 70%, DC — 76%, Delaware –75%, Maine — 77%, Nebraska — 74%, New Hampshire –69%, Nevada — 72%, New Mexico — 76%, Rhode Island — 74%, and Vermont — 75%; in Southern and border states: Arkansas –80%, Kentucky — 80%, Mississippi –77%, Missouri — 70%, North Carolina — 74%, and Virginia — 74%; and in other states polled: California — 70%, Connecticut — 74% , Massachusetts — 73%, Minnesota — 75%, New York — 79%, Washington — 77%, and West Virginia- 81%.

    The National Popular Vote bill has passed 31 state legislative chambers, in 21 small, medium-small, medium, and large states, including one house in Arkansas (6), Connecticut (7), Delaware (3), The District of Columbia (3), Maine (4), Michigan (17), Nevada (5), New Mexico (5), New York (31), North Carolina (15), and Oregon (7), and both houses in California (55), Colorado (9), Hawaii (4), Illinois (21), New Jersey (15), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (12), Rhode Island (4), Vermont (3), and Washington (11). The bill has been enacted by Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Washington. These six states possess 73 electoral votes — 27% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect.

    See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php