Skip to content


Time to Turn Responsibility for North Korea Over to Its Neighbors

Doug Bandow
Campaign For Liberty
Oct 11, 2010

Three leading Washington conservatives — the Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol, American Enterprise Institute’s Arthur Brooks, and Heritage Foundation’s Ed Feulner — have co-written an article chiding Tea Party activists for not enthusiastically backing America’s imperial foreign policy and oversize military. The three worry along with other neoconservatives that average citizens are more interested in defending America than in bombing, invading, and occupying other nations.

Of course, the neocon mantra is that perpetual war is necessary to protect the U.S. In this view, America is a helpless giant, at risk everywhere around the globe. The U.S., the world’s sole superpower, the most powerful and dominant nation ever at any point in human history, supposedly is threatened by such behemoths as Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea, Cuba, Serbia, Haiti, and Somalia, as well as Russia and China. If Washington does not subsidize wealthy allies and engage in global social engineering, forcibly remaking friends and foes alike, America’s adversaries may strike and extinguish human liberty, creating a new Dark Age.

The result of this policy is that every other nation’s problems become Washington’s problems. Like North Korea, which has become the world’s first Communist monarchy.

The so-called Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is irrelevant to U.S. security. The impoverished nation has a population of about 24 million, most of whom face constant hardship and even possible starvation. The economy is a wreck and Pyongyang produces little other than minerals and counterfeit currency. The North’s military equips undertrained, malnourished soldiers with ancient equipment. One American aircraft carrier has more firepower than the entire North Korean military.

What of the DPRK’s putative nuclear arsenal? No one really knows what Pyongyang possesses — numbers or capabilities. The North probably hasn’t miniaturized any weapons that it might have constructed. North Korea also doesn’t have a missile capable of hitting America, let alone doing so accurately.

Moreover, “Dear Leader” Kim Jong-il gives every indication of being evil, not stupid. He knows that the U.S. could wipe his nation off the map. He is famous for his taste for cognac, Swedish blondes, and movies; he most certainly wants his virgins in this life, not the next. And he wouldn’t be wasting his time attempting to pass power on to his son if he planned self-immolation in a pyre of fire. Deterrence worked against Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Kim’s father, Kim Il-sung. It will continue to work against Kim Jong-il.

The North poses a greater threat against South Korea, but even here the purported danger is exaggerated. The Republic of Korea is far ahead on every measure of national power other than quantity of troops and weapons. The South’s forces are better trained and its equipment is more capable; Seoul has a much larger army reserve and military industrial base. The ROK has twice the population and upwards of 40 times the GDP of the North. Moreover, Seoul trades more with China and Russia, the North’s traditional allies, than does the North today.

Indeed, the South felt so secure that it spent much of the last decade investing in and aiding Pyongyang, even as the latter was pursuing a foreign policy of brinkmanship and developing nuclear weapons. The supposedly conservative government in Seoul refused to close the South Korean-run Kaesong industrial park in the North even after the DPRK sank a South Korean warship earlier this year. The ROK also recently restarted aid to North Korea. If the Seoul government isn’t worried about its national security, then Americans shouldn’t give it much thought.

The only reason Washington is so deeply involved in the peninsula’s politics is because of its long-standing security guarantee and troop presence in the South. The 27,000 troops do nothing to protect America. As noted earlier, Pyongyang has no way to harm the U.S. And Kim Jong-il knows that any attack would result in instant and devastating retaliation. The only potential targets within his reach are America’s forces in the ROK.

The U.S. has another objective: to dissuade the North from building nuclear weapons. But nearly two decades of negotiation appear to be at a dead end. There may be no harm in trying again, but no one should have any illusions about the likelihood of making a deal.

In fact, current politics in Pyongyang works against any negotiated solution. Two years ago Dear Leader Kim suffered a stroke. He remains in ill health. Being less vigorous physically and weaker politically — who knows how long he will be in charge — Kim is less able to face down the military and bargain away its most important weapon even if he wants to. Especially if he hopes to maintain military support for making his son, Kim Jong-un, his heir apparent.

The future is even less certain. The Korean Worker’s Party just held its first party congress in decades to effectively anoint the younger Kim. But it took “Great Leader” Kim Il-sung years to move his son, Kim Jong-il, into positions of power. The latter likely won’t have nearly as much time to do the same with his son.

And there are numerous claimants to power: a brother-in-law and sister, two more sons, a motley collection of other family members including, it is thought, some not formally acknowledged, and many party and military officials who have been waiting for years for their opportunity to rule. The process could be anything but smooth.

Thus, the next government, irrespective of Jong-un’s status, is likely to be weak and divided. Whether struggling for or consolidating power, no North Korean leader is going to want the military on the other side. No one is likely to push the armed services to give up nuclear weapons.

It is a nasty situation. But why are Americans expected to sort out the mess?

Rather than treating North Korea as a U.S. problem, Washington should turn the issue back to Pyongyang’s neighbors. Any map demonstrates that the DPRK is primarily an issue for South Korea, Japan, and China, not America.

Only the South is vulnerable to a traditional conventional assault, and it is well able to defend itself. If it wants to provide aid to and invest in its totalitarian neighbor — a bizarre policy followed by Seoul even as it relied upon American military support — it should bear the full cost of doing so.

Japan is conceivably at risk from a North Korean missile attack, though Pyongyang’s capabilities are limited. The DPRK’s threatening policy has caused some in Japan to rethink its minimal defense posture, but Tokyo should do far more. The government of this wealthy, high-tech society has the resources to defend itself. There’s no reason for America to continue treating Japan as a welfare dependent.

The North isn’t likely to attack the People’s Republic of China, but any instability emanating from Pyongyang will affect the PRC. China would suffer from any war against South Korea or Japan, and bear most of the cost from the DPRK’s collapse. Today Beijing believes itself to be the chief beneficiary of the status quo, based on Pyongyang’s survival. But there is nothing stable about a politically divided, economically impoverished totalitarian state developing nuclear weapons. American disengagement would force the Chinese government to confront the North Korean “problem.”

The Cold War presented the U.S. with unique international challenges. But that world has disappeared. The Soviet Union, Warsaw Pact, Maoist China, and assorted Third World communist dictatorships are all gone. America’s allies have all recovered from war and outrange their potential antagonists. And Uncle Sam is broke.

As candidate Barack Obama often said, it is time for a change. America needs a foreign policy fit for a republic rather than an empire. The Korean peninsula is a good place to start.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Politics.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. Or if you need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install and other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php