Skip to content


Few Americans support FCC’s so-called ‘Net Neutrality’ regulations, poll finds

internethttp 1019 Few Americans support FCCs so called Net Neutrality regulations, poll findsMost Americans have no appetite for new government regulation of the Internet, according to year-end data released by the conservative-leaning polling firm Rasmussen.

Their survey of “likely voters” found that just one in five were in approval when asked if the government should regulate the Internet as it does television and radio.

“By a 52% to 27% margin, voters believe that more free market competition is better than more regulation for protecting Internet users,” the firm summarized. “Republicans and unaffiliated voters overwhelmingly share this view, but a plurality of Democrats (46%) think more regulation is the better approach.”

Additionally, 56 percent of respondents said they feared the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) would push a political agenda through its regulations.

While the remarkably small number of “Net Neutrality” supporters is striking — with just 21 percent saying they support the regulations — the poll’s question appears to skew the debate’s true nature.

The FCC, which passed so-called “Net Neutrality” regulations recently by a party-line vote of 3-2, is not treating the Internet as it does television or radio. Instead, its new rules explicitly condone the plans of major network operators, which initially opposed neutrality rules until the FCC unveiled the actual policies.

The FCC’s regulations would actually permit bandwidth rationing and the establishment of “super-tiers” where certain traffic is given priority over others. That runs contrary to the principle of “Net Neutrality,” which would require that all types of Internet traffic be treated equally.

The rules authored by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski would require ISPs to allow their customers access to all legal online content, applications and services over hard-wired networks.

But the plan would also allow for a greater fractioning of the Internet and data rationing on mobile and wired networks, according to analysis of the policies. Major network stakeholders like Verizon and AT&T would be able to place caps on how much users can access the Internet each month, with overage charges for users who download too much information. Certain types of data traffic, like peer-to-peer file sharing, could also be banned outright.

The FCC would additionally require broadband providers to disclose their network management practices, and ISPs will be allowed to charge fees to businesses serving large quantities of data.

As a candidate for the presidency, Senator Barack Obama was adamantly in support of “Net Neutrality.” For supporters, that promise now stings of betrayal.

“The rule is so riddled with loopholes that it’s become clear that this FCC chairman crafted it with the sole purpose of winning the endorsement of AT&T and cable lobbyists, and not defending the interests of the tens of millions of Internet users,” The Nation‘s John Nichols commented.

Activists with the “Save the Internet” coalition accused the FCC of passing “Not Neutrality,” noting that the rules will not prevent telecommunications firms from dividing the Internet into slow and fast lanes.

“The chairman chose to ignore the voices of more than 2 million people who have urged Washington to support real and lasting Net Neutrality protections,” Free Press organizer Tim Karr wrote. “His rule, for the first time in history, allows discrimination over the mobile Internet, paving the way for widespread industry abuses.”

Nearly 2 billion people had access to the Internet in 2010, according to marketing research firm Miniwatts.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Internet, Politics.

Tagged with , , , , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php