Skip to content


Repealing ‘Don’t Ask’ would not harm military, defense secretary says

US troops 1215303c 300x187 Repealing Dont Ask would not harm military, defense secretary saysRepealing the military’s discriminatory anti-gay policies “would not be the wrenching, traumatic change that many have feared and predicted,” Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced Tuesday.

Gates was speaking at a press conference announcing the release of a long-term study on the impacts of allowing gays to serve openly in the military.

He urged Congress to act quickly because of a recent effort by a federal judge to overturn the law, which would force the military to implementation a repeal of the policy immediately.

“I am determined to see that, if the law is repealed, the changes are implemented in such a way as to minimize any negative impact on the morale, cohesion and effectiveness of combat units that are deployed, or about to deploy, to the front lines,” Gates said. “Given the present circumstances, those that choose not to act legislatively are rolling the dice that this policy will not be abruptly overturned by the courts.”

“What is called for is a careful and considered approach,” he added. “An approach that, to the extent possible, welcomes all who are qualified and capable of serving their country in uniform, but one that does not undermine – out of haste or dogmatism – those attributes that make the US military the finest fighting force in the world.”

The 267-page report concludes that “the risk of repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell to overall military effectiveness is low” but adds that the implementation of the repeal could “bring about some limited and isolated disruption to unit cohesion and retention.”

The disruption is not expected to be long lasting or widespread, according to the report, and could be ameliorated through increased training.

The report found that 70 percent of troops surveyed said having a gay member in their unit would have positive, mixed, or no effect on the unit’s ability to “work together to get the job done.”

The percentage of those who thought having a gay member in their unit would negatively impact the unit’s ability to work together was significantly higher in combat arms units. In Marine combat arms units, 58 percent said it would have a negative impact, compared to 43 percent in the Marine Corps.

“Any personnel policy change for which a group that size predicts negative consequences must be approached with caution,” the report notes. “However, there are a number of other factors that still lead us to conclude that the risk of repeal to overall military effectiveness is low.”

The report also found that 69% of troops surveyed believed they had worked in a unit with someone who was homosexual and 92% of those who believed they worked in a unit with someone who was homosexual rated the ability of unit to work together as very good, good, or neither good nor poor.

“Though there are fundamental differences between matters of race, gender, and sexual orientation, we believe the US military’s prior experiences with racial and gender integration are relevant,” the report states.

In the 1940s and 1950s, as the report notes, the US military successfully implemented racial integration in the midst of the Korean War and during a time when resistance to change was far more intense.

“Some of our best-known and most-revered military leaders from the World War II-era voiced opposition to the integration of blacks into the military, making strikingly similar predictions of the negative impact on unit cohesion,” the report says. “But by 1953, 95% of all African-American soldiers were serving in racially integrated units, while public buses in Montgomery, Alabama and other cities were still racially segregated.”

The report notes that a number of troops expressed concerns of having to share living and bathing facilities with openly gay members, but concludes that creating separate facilities would be “a logistical nightmare, expensive, and impossible to administer.”

“Most concerns we heard about showers and bathrooms were based on stereotype — that gay men and lesbians will behave as predators in these situations, or that permitting homosexual and heterosexual people of the same sex to shower together is tantamount to allowing men and women to shower together,” the report states.

The report rejects this stereotype, noting that homosexual and heterosexual people shower together in college dorms, college and high school gyms, professional sports locker rooms, police and fire stations, and athletic clubs across the US without problems.

The report was based on the responses from 115,052 active duty troops and the 44,266 spouses of active duty troops as well as information gathered from face-to-face “information exchange forums,” focus groups, foreign allies, veterans groups, and groups both for and against repeal of the current policy.

In addition, the report investigated the views of current and former members of the military who are not heterosexual.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs says Obama believes Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell can be repealed in the lame-duck session of Congress.

The House has already passed legislation that would overturn the policy, but Republicans in the Senate have prevented the bill, which is part of a large defense bill, from passing.

This video is from CNN’s Newroom, broadcast Nov. 30, 2010.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in General News.

Tagged with , , , , , , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php