Skip to content

Israel-Palestine: Leslie Gelb’s unconventional wisdom

by Jim Miles


In its Fortieth Anniversary special issue, Foreign Policy magazine (now owned by the Washington Post) presents a series of articles titled Unconventional Wisdom.  According to the editors letter, Foreign Policy endeavours to keep alive the relentless determination to resist the uncritical thinking of the foreign-policy herd.  The editor states that this issue is a tribute to the smart, reasoned, and pull-no-punches debate these articles represent.


Most of the unconventional wisdom, when juxtaposed with much of the information available away from the mainstream media of corporate U.S.A., is quite ordinary and not all that unconventional.  Conventional is given the meaning of not natural, not spontaneous, following tradition. In that light, is it unconventional to say growth cannot last forever?  Not really, that has been postulated for many decades if not centuries.   Remember Malthus?  He is coming back with a vengeance.  Is it unconventional to say the rich really dont care about the poor?  Hardly, that is as old as human states and empires.  Some of the other essays on China and security would certainly go against the conventional wisdom of the Glen Becks and Bill OReillys of the world, but for anyone who follows non-mainstream media, there is much conventional wisdom that passes here for unconventional. 




A few of the articles make presentations that while theoretically debunking conventional wisdom, simply continue the conventional mythology as the U.S. wishes to see it.  Leslie Gelb, president Emeritus of the Council of Foreign Relations, and from reading his bibliography well out on the right wing of U.S. foreign policy, believes he is providing some unconventional wisdom when arguing America Pressures Israel Plenty.  If that were true, it would be unconventional, but there is nothing in his essay to support his thesis.  He postulates two pieces of conventional wisdom  – really only one, each representing a side of the same coin – that the Israelis are the main stumbling block to Middle East peace, and not the Palestinians; and that the U.S. has failed to use it influence to pressure Israel for serious compromises.  From that Gelb attempts to say the opposite, that the U.S. has pressured Israel a lot.  In this case it is truly unconventional as it is essentially not true.


Gelb argues that Israel has a long and compelling history of making major concessions to Arabs.  He describes the return of the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt as booty of war that was returned to Egypt in an act of territorial generosity unprecedented in modern history.   The withdrawal was only one part of an overall agreement that saw both sides accepting collective parameters of peace and was a necessary part of any negotiations towards peace.  It was not a gift, not a concession, not a generosity, but very much a part of the overall peace process as witnessed by UN Security Council Resolution 242:


1. Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East should include the application of both the following principles:

      (i) Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;

      (ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and    acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political    independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within       secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force; 

That Israel gained largely from it is unarguable – a safe western boundary guaranteed by U.S. military and economic support to both parties, allowing the Israelis to concentrate their military to the east and north.  Three years later Israel occupied southern Lebanon and stayed for twenty years before leaving –  in perhaps another move of unprecedented territorial generosity?


The argument then turns to some simple phrases that without context are meaningless.  The first is Israelis negotiated with Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat, whom they rightly considered a terrorist. Is this supposed to demonstrate U.S. pressure?  And if so, how?  The British negotiated with the IRA, and they negotiated with the ANC, both known terrorist groups.  The U.S. has negotiated with the Taliban, and indirectly supports the Mujahadeen-e-Khalq of Iran whom they label as terrorists.  The U.S. has supported anti-Castro terrorists, in particular Orlando Bosch, who performed the 1976 mid-air bombing of a Cubana Airlines flight killing 73 people, and is in U.S. territory in spite of Bushs warning against those who harbour terrorists.  Essentially, the U.S. and Israel will negotiate with whomever they feel they can reach some advantage with for resource, political, and financial control.


Then there are more concessions to the Palestinians.  Gelb argues that Israel offered more than ninety per cent of the West Bank to the Palestinians.  How wonderful!  Especially considering that the Palestinians originally occupied one hundred per cent of it.  Even more, the Palestinians occupied one hundred per cent of the Palestinian Mandate before the British packed up and left.  The UN partition plan offered the Palestinians forty-four per cent of the territory – how generous, how unprecedented!  The Israelis conquered another-twenty four per cent in the 1948 nakba, then occupied the rest in the 1967 war.  How generous, how unprecedented of them to offer the Palestinians what amounts to about eighteen per cent of their original homeland. 


According to Gelb, this offer was then upped with a sliver of Arab East Jerusalem – their own land again – a land link to Gaza and a limited right of return.  By this time the Palestinians had grown wary of the U.S. led Israeli negotiations and without anything in writing and no real commitments, the deal collapsed.


In return the Israelis received little, except for everything they already controlled against the rule of international law for both occupied territories and human rights.   After a brief presentation about the arguments of both sides for further concessions, Gelb states that the Palestinians do not acknowledge that when Israel departed Gaza in 2005, it uprooted 9,000 Israeli settlers. What is there it acknowledgeit is a known fact, obviously recognized by both sides.  Although not argued here as a generous concession as it has been elsewhere, the move was a combination of political ploy to represent itself to the western media as a move for peace, while at the same time allowing the ongoing settlements in the West Bank to proceed.  The overall result was the imprisonment of all of Gaza and complete control of all movement of people and resources. 


In the next statement he argues, Israel got rockets and a terrorist enclave run by Hamas.  True, but only when taken completely without context and completely without analysis of historical events.  There is no cause and effect as implied by the juxtaposition of the statements.   With Gaza effectively sealed off and controlled in all facets by Israel, and with daily routine shelling, mortar fire, and sniper fire by the IDF, the scale of violence was perpetrated mainly by the Israelis.  Also, it did not take much U.S. pressure to convince Israel to negate the democratic election of Hamas to power within the Palestinian territories and to try and create a civil war in Gaza between Fatah and Hamas, with U.S./Israeli support going to Fatah.   


Finally Gelb comes around to the U.S. again, saying, the United States has pushed and pulled Israel toward concessions, but received little or no credit from the Arab side.  Unfortunately for Gelbs argument, with all the economic and military support that the U.S. has provided and continues to provide to Israel over the last four decades, much more than talk could have been presented as pressure.  The Israelis know quite well that the U.S. presents a good rhetorical front about peace and democracy, but will only act in areas where its geopolitical concerns are being denied or harmed.   The American role has been real and substantial only in that sense, a real and substantial support of the Israeli government and it actions in Palestine. 


The summary is that both Israel and the U.S. deserve credit for their concrete efforts to make peace.  Those concrete efforts amount to a huge increase in settlements made of concrete, a security fence made in part of concrete, many concrete road blocks and inspection points, and ironically, the destruction of much Palestinian civilian infrastructure wherein concrete has been transformed into rubble.  There is much more concrete in the bypass roads and other infrastructure to support the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory.  The U.S. also accepts Israeli ambiguity on its nuclear weapons, its main reactor at Dimona protected under layers of concrete, simply another part of the U.S. double standards when dealing with nuclear powers both in and out of the NPT.


All other efforts on the part of the U.S. are simply political rhetoric to sound good for  domestic money and votes, and to rationalize its geopolitical strategies in the region.  Along with that, the Palestinian Papers reveal how much the Palestinians were willing to concede to the Israelis concerning settlements, Jerusalem, and the right of return.  If someone of Gelbs credentials and contacts was unaware of this, he wilfully remained so, and while it is convenient to argue from hindsight, Gelb certainly should have been aware that the now disgraced Palestinian negotiators were offering much more than the populace would accept. 

View the original article at Global Research

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Middle East, War on terror.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .

0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.


Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?