Skip to content


The price of Free Speech in the USA and the UK

By Dark Politricks

Two cases in the news recently have shown the difference between how Free Speech is treated on both sides of the Atlantic.

Whilst many people across the world are watching with dismay as the USA seemingly slips further and further into the kind of futuristic militaristic police state that Hollywood feature films are made of a recent Supreme Court ruling has shown that at least the First Amendment is being protected even if the others are being decimated bit by bit.

At the centre of the case lies a group of defendants that very few people would by sympathetic towards. The case revolves around the awful Westboro Baptist Church who chose to spend their time picketing the funerals of soldiers holding up placards claiming that God is punishing them and their country for crimes such as tolerating homosexuals and abortions.

Documentary after documentary has found the Westboro Church members to be a sad, delusional and very sick crowd of people and I cannot think of many people who wouldn’t be upset, disgusted and outraged if these people turned up outside a family members funeral with placards claiming that their death was due to biblical vengence.

The case in question involved a lawsuit brought by the father of a dead Marine, a Mr Snyder, who filed a lawsuit in March 2006, accusing the church of intentionally inflicting emotional distress when they picketed his sons funeral by holding up signs that said  “Thank God for Dead Soldiers”, “You’re Going to Hell” and “God Hates the USA/Thank God for 9/11″.

Mr Synder initially won $11m at trial in 2007 but this was later reduced by another court to $5m. However the Church appealed against this judgement and both a federal appeals court in Virginia and the Supreme Court agreed that their protest was covered by the First Amendment and therefore the constitution shielded them from any kind of liability and the case was thrown out on these grounds.

However much the facts of the case in question may sicken readers to the core and however much sympathy one might have with the father of the dead Marine who lost his $5 million compensation award we must remember that at the centre of this debate is the right to speak your mind without fear of reprisal by the state.

Very rarely do court cases that deal with the First Amendment involve nice and easy black and white situations that invoke sympathy with the defendant. As the famous saying goes:

“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”

Whilst it would be hard to find anyone who could agree with the tactics that the Westboro Baptish Church and others of their ilk use to make their voices heard Americans should be proud of the fact that they still live in a country in which the Supreme Court still has the ability and will to make decisions that upkeep the constitution no matter how unpopular they might be in the court of public opinion.

In the present day it is quite heartening to see such a decision but it is also a shame when one realises how few of these types of decisions are being made and how much the constitution has been eroded over the years.

Compare this victory for free speech with a similar case in the UK in which a group of Muslim protesters picketed a welcome home parade for soldiers just back from Afghanistan. The anti-war protesters staged a demonstration in which they called the soldiers rapists, murderers and baby killers.

Whilst these claims are technically true, see this, this and this the group were arrested under the catch all “Public Order Act” and convicted of using threatening and abusive words towards the soldiers.

The Public Order Act 1986 is one of the most insidious pieces of legislation ever created and is used by cops all over the country every day to arrest people that have spoken to them the “wrong way”. Just look at Section 5 and 4 of the act and ask yourself how many times you might have been arrested for committing any of these crimes.

Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986:

“(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he:

(a) uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or
(b) displays any writingsign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,
within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassmentalarm or distress thereby.”

Section 4 of the Public Order Act 1986:

1) A person is guilty of an offence if he –

a) uses towards another person threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or
b) distributes or displays to another person any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting,

with intent to cause that person to believe that immediate unlawful violence will be used against him or another by any person, or to provoke the immediate use of unlawful violence by that person or another, or whereby that person is likely to believe that such violence will be used or it is likely that such violence will be provoked.

2) An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is distributed or displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the other person is also inside that dwelling.

In the majority of cases the person that is insulted, threatened or abused by the words of another is a uniformed police officer and there is so much leeway in the law that it means it’s impossible to tell what level or strength of language is considered “offensive” enough to get yourself arrested One drunken girl may shout obscenities at a cop for the best part of an hour and get nothing more than a free lift home or verbal telling off whilst another member of the public may tell a cop to F-off and end up with a court date.

I have no doubt that if the Westboro Church protesters had carried out their protest in the UK they to would have been arrested for similar public order offences and it is a shame that our own judiciary weighs more heavily the imaginary or real offence that one person may experience over the right of another to speak their mind. No-one deserves the right not to be offended but the Public Order Act is often used by our Police and authorities to ensure that the plebs keep in line and and especially keep quiet in public.

The US Judge who ruled in favour of the Westboro Church said that no matter how much pain was caused by the actions of the church;

“we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker. As a nation we have chosen a different course – to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate.”

Compare that to our own judge, Lord Justice Gross, who ruled that the right to freedom of expression was important but that

“the focus on minority rights should not result in overlooking the rights of the majority”

Two wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for dinner in other words.

The five Muslim protesters tried to argue that under the Human Rights Act they had a right to freedom of expression but their appeal was rejected by the High Court and their actions were ruled illegal because they went beyond legitimate protest and were personally abusive to the troops.

So there you have it, two pretty similar cases both involving protests by minority groups that could be considered offensive by others. In the USA it was judged okay for a bunch of loons to picket and harass a family during one of their lowest moments making unprovable claims about an imaginary man in the sky hating their dead loved ones due to unrelated and irrelevant acts.

However here in the UK a protest based around provable claims is considered a public order offence because the perpetrators of the crimes that have killed and maimed thousands of women, children and men were upset at being called out on their decision to fight an unpopular war rather than be hero worshipped as I’m sure some of them might have been expecting.

So whilst many people might disagree with the Westboro Churchs actions and rightly so, the Supreme Court judgement should be seen as a positive sign that things are not quite so bad as certain people think they are.

It is also clear that the judiciary in the USA still values free speech and is another sign that here in the UK we are desperatley in need of our own Bill of Rights to enshrine those liberties and freedoms that many people probably still believe they have until a cop or Judge abruptly changes their mind.

It is important for all of us to remember that once we start limiting what can and cannot be said or written because others maybe offended we might as well give up any hope of winning the phony war on terror. What is the point of the war if we are going to basically do the terrorists job for them by just handing over one of those treasured freedoms they apparently hate us so much for.

Lets all try to remember that the next time a TV talking head or right wing newspaper starts spouting off about evil Muslim / Christian protesters or anti war demonstrators. Free speech does not have a price tag and we shouldn’t ever attempt to put one on it no matter how much sympathy we may have with the families of the funerals being picketed or the disabled soldiers marching through our towns.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Dark Politricks Articles, Freedom of Speech, Protests & Civil Disobedience.

Tagged with , , .


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?



css.php