Skip to content


Physical science and the case for controlled demolition at WTC-7


By Dark Politricks

I have been having an interesting debate over on an article I wrote some time back called 9.11 skeptics versus logic, reason and scientific principles.

History is full of examples that prove an event like 9.11 is well within the realms of possibility.  Sociopaths and psychopaths are attracted to power and our politicians and leaders would never top any poll for moral behaviour.

Our intelligence agencies engage in nefarious and underhand activities all the time and it would come as no surprise to me to find out that 9.11 could have been ordered or allowed for some misguided reason such as the PNAC call for a New Pearl Harbour to re-build America’s defences.

However like most people who have looked into the events surrounding 9.11 I have found the collapse of WTC-7 to be the biggest thorn in the side of the official story.

Like a lot of people I find it very hard to accept the official explanation for the collapse of WTC-7 especially when I watch it side by side with videos of controlled demolitions of similar sized buildings.

The official story is that a new phenomenon came into existence on 9.11 and the WTC-7 building suffered a fire induced progressive collapse.

Having not seen any other videos of high rise buildings that have collapsed due to fire alone I have nothing to compare and contrast the videos of WTC-7 with and like most people I have been brought up to believe that if it looks like a cat, walks like a cat and purrs like one it usually is a cat.

We can quibble over the odd split second or two when it comes to “freefall descent” but when it comes to watching a building collapse evenly and uniformly into it’s own footprint at speeds indistinguishable from freefall rather than slowly and unevenly towards the point of least resistance, which should have been the weakened corner of the building, we have a right to ask questions.

Most of the evidence has now been destroyed, shipped away or buried and anyone wanting to answer the question of WTC-7 is left with two choices. Make a computer model like NIST did and which they still haven’t released the source code for and prove your theory with flashy graphics, by excluding parts of the building and loading the parameters or carry out our own experiments to prove or rule out parts of the official story.

Whilst coming up with my latest reply to a comment which was in response to a request for proof that thermite can cut through steel I came across this wonderful video.

Made by an engineer, it uses physical experiments to test the theories put forward by NIST and 9.11 investigators including:

  • Can Thermite cut through Steel – Yes it can.
  • Can the sulphuric residue found in the dust and on the piece of debris that looked like Swiss cheese be from materials found within the building rather than Thermite or Nano Thermate - Seemingly no.
  • Would super large quantities of Thermite or Themate be required to bring down a building the size of WTC-7 – No.

As the video author says at the end himself:

“isn’t it time we use physical science rather than political science to investigate 9.11″.

This video is proof that the physical science backs up the theory.

 

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Dark Politricks Articles, False Flag, Investigations & Inquiries, Science, Television Video & Film.

Tagged with 9.11, False Flag, Science, Thermite, WTC-7.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Any support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

Please remember I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has been taken offline by their original hosters which would be unavailable for viewing if it wasn't for this site. Therefore I would kindly ask you to help support me so that the site can continue doing what I think is an important job as well as reporting on stories the mainstream media would rather you didn't know about. I personally think it is important to host material such as removed reports that show that even FOX News once repoted on Israeli spy rings following the 9.11 hijackers before September 11th Or publishing the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was removed from their site once they enacted some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power.

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation, especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful!


One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Undlarakhar says

    I attest that the operation may have been thought up outside America and enacted on us soil with intent to harm America. But within moments of the attack it is quite obvious to me that the building was taken down intentionally, by the us government, perhaps to save something like lives. The question for me is how much foreknowledge of the event did those demolitions teams have? And why cannot the government be honest about the large amount of gold that was seemingly never recovered. And just be honest in general about this and any other situation like posting pictures of there dick on the web, who cares the LEAST you can do is be honest about it. WE will forgive you, but not if you try to pull the sheets over our eyes while you rape our asses.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php