Skip to content

The UAW Is Fighting for Its Life

Dissident Voice Article

By David Macaray

When the elephant is in trouble even a frog will kick him.

— Hindu Proverb

President Bob King and the executive board of the United Auto Workers (UAW) are being criticized for abandoning the pursuit of GWIs (general wage increases, the Holy Grail of union contracts), and boldly embracing the strategy of profit-sharing.  They’ve been accused of everything from gullibility to defeatism to outright treason.  Personally, instead of being raked over the coals, I think they should be applauded.

Let’s not forget that the UAW (founded in Detroit in 1935) has lost more than one million members.  In 1979, it had upwards of 1.5 million members; today it has about 390,000.  The UAW has seen itself go from being celebrated as America’s most successful and prestigious labor union to being derided and sneered at as a hideous monument to wretched excess.  Arguably, no American union in history—indeed, no union in the history of the world—has been hit harder or been more humiliated.

Beginning in the 1980s—plagued by foreign competition (much of it rigged), bad management, and Reagan’s anti-union crusade—the UAW has watched it all slip away, forced to accept every concession that came down the pike:  two-tier wage structures, reduced health care and pensions, reduced crews, revamped seniority and work rules, elimination of cost-of-living allowances, etc.  Name a concession, and it’s a good bet the UAW has already granted it.

For armchair critics to sit back and lecture these union leaders on what they should or shouldn’t do takes a lot of nerve.  To second-guess this once-great institution for desperately trying to come up with a plan that gives them a fighting chance to rebuild themselves is not only presumptuous, it’s fucking outrageous.

And as for those tired old clichés about profit-sharing being a scam, or a palliative, or a form of “piece work” or, ideologically, tantamount to collaborating with the enemy, these critics need to lift themselves out of the rhetorical muck, take a deep breath, and carefully re-examine the history of organized labor.

Profit-sharing isn’t a new idea.  Going all the way back to 1866, the year the nation’s first labor federation (the NLU: National Labor Union) was founded, working people have been openly and collectively questioning whether the hourly wage formula was, in fact, the best way to be reimbursed for their labor.

Under its charismatic founder, William Sylvis, the NLU formally proposed employee co-ops, arrangements where workers more or less ran the businesses and received commensurate shares of the profits.  It was a stunningly innovative idea, and, predictably, one that proved far easier to formulate than to enact, but it illustrated the Big Picture concerns of working people.

In 1890, professional baseball players decided they’d found a better way of being compensated for their labor—a better way than receiving wages from team owners.  In fact, they decided they no longer needed to be owned.  After concluding that the only things they really required were equipment, a playing field, and an audience willing to pay to watch, the players set out on their own and formed a co-op, the Players League.

Another surprise:  When you look at the history of these profit-sharing incentive plans, you find that most of them were discontinued for the simplest of reasons:  They were too successful.  It’s true.  Once management examined the books and saw they were shelling out a far greater share of their wealth than they anticipated, they withdrew support for these “team” enterprises and returned to the traditional way of compensating workers; i.e., fighting at the bargaining table over hourly wages.

Then there’s the “insider” criticism—the objection that this profit-sharing scheme will kill any chance of the UAW ever going out on strike.  However, had these “insiders” been paying attention, they’d know that as part of the 2009 auto bailout (the $24.9 billion in federal loan guarantees that saved the industry), strikes were already off the table. Per the agreement, Chrysler and GM workers were prohibited from going on strike over the issue of wages.

Thus, the UAW has declared it’s no longer looking specifically for wages.  What it’s looking for is a reliable form of compensation that transcends wages.  And given these recessionary times, the UAW’s frailty, and the no-strike restrictions of the ’09 bailout, profit-sharing is not only a commendable idea, it could turn out to be a brilliant one.

View the original article at

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/


Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?

0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.