By Dark Politricks
A new video has been released that shows the missile / plane hitting the Pentagon on 9.11.
The video is shot at a higher angle and I don’t know why it has taken this long to be released or if it has why I have not come across it before seeing it on an interview Gordon Duff did with Press TV the other week.
It seems very odd that someone would have this kind of very important footage and decide to keep it to themselves for so long.
I want to know the details of who shot it, why they didn’t release it earlier and what kind of links they have to either the government or anti-government pro 9.11 Truth groups, maybe they have none to either.
I also want to know why the footage is so dark when the attack was carried out in the daytime. Either some video manipulation has been carried out to make the object hitting the Pentagon stand out or it has been tampered with some other way.
For all I know it could be a 6th formers attempt at a 9.11 10th anniversary internet hoax and as we all know video manipulation is very easy to do. We just need to think back at all those fake Bin Laden videos that have been released and if you are a believer in the no-planes theory then you already believe the WTC film footage is faked so this video will unlikely pass your validity tests.
I have no way of verfifying whether it is real or not but it certainly beats the only other previous video we have been shown from a Pentagon CCTV camera. If this footage can be verified as real then it is an important piece of evidence as even though the shot is blurry surely proper analysis could be done with the actual length of a 757, scaled to the footage to see if they match or differ?
It does seem strange that it comes on the 10th annivesary of the 9.11 attacks and there is every possibility that it is either some kind of set-up. Either that or a very weird co-incidence that a video of this magnitude would appear at this late time.
A time that we have been supposedly fighting al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen whilst helping them beat an ex ally to become rulers and possessors of all Col Gaddafi’s military hardware, billions of cash and stockpile of WMD including enough poison gas to kill most London tube travellers.
Ten years of a rising Police State at home, a massive loss of liberties and for travellers a chance of a free sexual encounter with the TSA. And who can forget the “assassination” of Bin Laden where no photos before he was shot were released from the SEALS helmet cameras and of course his quick burial at sea like Blackbeard.
Nothing to see here, we’ve only just killed the person supposedly responsible for the last 10 years of war. Unlike the capture of Saddam Hussein there was no parade in front of cameras of the captured enemy and no glorified photos to show the world that the USA had finally succeeded in their decade old mission to hunt down the big bad bogey man.
Even the Liberal Democrats, the supposed protectors of freedom and liberty and the only main party in the UK that was officially against the Iraq war – supported the “humanitarian” intervention on one side of a civil war in an oil rich country and reneged on the only decent part of their manifesto that I actually supported e.g their Freedom Bill that became a “Heres some things we don’t mind you do” bill.
Literally the guts were ripped from the bill and smeared across the floor of parliament in a great show of disdain to all supporters of their hypocritical power hungry party that took their pieces of silver, ministers cars and luxury travel in return for all their principles and any future hope of a student voting for them.
So the 10 year anniversary of 9.11 is going to bring out a lot of documentaries discussing the day’s events and I can well imagine some of those straw men hit pieces the BBC like to do about “conspiracy theories” being the realm of loons and crazies as if ex Mossad Spies who freely admit carrying them out as official policy for Israel are just figments of our imagination.
So a video of this importance being released just before the anniversary is suspicious in my mind to say the least purely as I want to know why I and others haven’t seen it before.
There maybe a purely innocent explaination for this release but it is no lie to say that the 9.11 Truth movement has grown from strength to strength and during the ten years since that day the number of people who doubt the official story in at least one way has grown in the millions.
So this video of a plane or a missile hitting the Pentagon is a big event and we must remember that the Oxford definition of a missile is this:
- an object which is forcibly propelled at a target, either by hand or from a mechanical weapon.
- a weapon that is self-propelled or directed by remote control, carrying conventional or nuclear explosive.
Therefore a plane of any shape or size that was remotely or automatically controlled rather than flown by a pilot would in my mind at least count as a missile. This technology to fly a plane by remote control existed way before 9.11.
This is supposedly a big Boeing 757 plane that Gordon Duff claims he has spoken to people from Boeing that have reportedly claimed that a plane of that size would not be able to fly that fast and that low to the ground saying:
“We have engineers at Boeing the company that manufactured the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon that say it couldn’t fly that fast, it can’t fly that low, it can’t make those turns and it couldn’t have been there,”
My very own father used to work designing aircraft engines and he has answered my question of whether a Boeing 757 could fly at 400mph at 30ft off the ground with the sentence “with difficulty and a great deal of skill”. Something which the pilot reportedly had none of.
The original photo I showed here was the punch out photograph where the plane reportedly exited the last wall rather than the point it entered the building. This photo has been used a lot by sites all over the place and is quite disingenuous as it makes people believe that the perfect round hole is the entry point of a plane the size of a Boeing 757 rather than the last exit point where only the remnants of the nose left the last inner ring of the Pentagon.
However leaving that aside it doesn’t explain the issue of the altitude data, either real or falsified, which has been released by the NTSB. This data which has been analysed by experts shows a discrepancy in the height of Flight 757 at the time of its approach.
If the data is to be believed then the actual aircraft altitude was 300 feet higher than claimed and the plane didn’t hit the Pentagon. You can find details over at http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html which has a detailed analysis of the flight recorder data.
This means either the data released to the public was falsified and someone left a mistake in by accident (or maybe they were sending a clue OR a big “fuck you”) or the actual plane flew over the building.
It certainly cannot mean that the plane hit the first floor. A Boeing 757 plane of this size supposedly flew at 400mph and only 30ft above the ground hitting the Pentagon at the bottom of the building after flying parallel to the ground for a considerable time without toppling over or hitting the ground first.
Apparently many pilots believe this feat of flying is impossible and many experienced pilots have attempted the manavoures that Hani Hanjour (who had been denied the usage of a small Cessna 172 which he had tried to rent because he was such a bad pilot) supposedly accomplished on 9.11 and failed to achieve the flying feat.
Whatever you believe about the 9.11 attacks and the attack at the Pentagon we now have another piece of the picture to slot in to all the other recently released videos and tape recordings.
We have witnesses prepared to testify who can’t and senior government figures ready to go public about what they know of the Bush Cheney axis of evil. The question is will we ever live to see the day when a proper inquiry into the attacks of 9.11 ever happens?