Skip to content

Cornering Baltasar Garzón: The Problem with Transitional Justice

Dissident Voice Article

By Binoy Kampmark

Those expert in the field of human rights lead charmed and dangerous lives.  Sometimes, they also find themselves in the dock, grilled for their efforts and persecuted for their inclinations.  In the case of the famed human rights warrior, the Spanish High Court Judge Baltasar Garzón, a dramatically shorted legal career is in the offing.  Another one has been suggested: one as a permanent appellant in the legal process, condemned to a long series of court challenges about his competence as a judge.

The justice has found himself convicted in the Gürtel public corruption case for authorising illegal phone tapping of conversations in jail houses between suspects and their lawyers of the Popular Party.  He has been suspended from the judiciary for 11 years.  In a turn of fortunes, he also faces a judgment which bars him from appealing, something he might well be adept at doing, and two other legal cases that will keep him busy on the other side of the bench for years to come.

The judge’s conduct has been something of a flashpoint in the battle over Spain’s historical memory.  He riles the forces of conservatism as he attracts the adoration of the left.  He was instrumental in commencing the legal proceedings against the former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet in London, a state of affairs that set the more conservative members of the legal profession on edge.  He successfully prosecuted former Argentinean military officer Adolfo Scilingo for his role in the ‘death flights’ during the Dirty War years between 1976 and 1983.

But here, he was facing the stern wording of a fellow judge, who ruled that his actions ‘these days are only found in totalitarian regimes.’  This was reverse logic at play – a man who had dedicated many years of his life fighting the incidents and features of authoritarian systems, found himself the subject of that very same legal rhetoric.

The proceedings have had a potent mixture of high comedy and farce.  And, just to make matters more colourful, Garzón finds himself embroiled with two other cases as well – allegations of bribery, and another more explosive trial in which he is charged with the unpardonable offence of peering into the Spanish past under Generalissimo Francisco Franco, supposedly violating the amnesty law of 1977.

The case on Garzón and his attempt to bypass the amnesty is potentially the most telling one, not to mention crippling – a disbarment of 20 years is on the judicial cards.  Burrowing into the dirtied archives of history is tantamount not merely to upsetting the apple cart, but replacing it altogether.  This particular bit of burrowing involved looking at atrocities committed during the Spanish Civil War (1939-39) and the subsequent and long rule of Franco, which only ended in 1975.

Spain’s pathway to democratic transition was premised on the mutual acceptance of blindness to cruelty – a blindness to the past that Garzón found hard to accept.  Indeed, he continues to believe that the 1977 law does not preclude human rights abuses from being investigated.  ‘I did what I believed should have been done.  It is not a question of ideology – judges are not supposed to be ideological.  There are hundreds of thousands of victims whose rights have not been respected’ (El Pais, Jan 31).

The question then posed was what the zealous advocate was going to do with his findings. According to Garzón, he was not intent on exhuming skeletons in the name of mounting persecutions.  His inquiry, egged on by 20 historical memory associations and 10 individuals, did not commence to find any bodies in the absence of jurisdiction to do so.  In November 2008, the full High Court panel decided that he should cease his investigations, something he did, in fact, do.  The right wing union Manos Limpias chose to see it differently, and the Spanish Supreme court agreed that there was, in fact, standing to pursue a case against Garzón.  This, despite the support for Garzón’s case from the Supreme Court’s chief prosecutor Luis Navajas.

The judge is being somewhat naïve in certain respects.  Human rights is an assumed ideology on the state of humanity, a set of principles and beliefs that has its followers.  In the end, it might be argued that, to be blind, may be wiser than otherwise.  But the mission of Garzón is different – to right the records of the past, but within the confines of existing laws.

Garzón finds himself in a contested area of justice practitioners call ‘transitional’.  In the fruit salad of jurisprudence on human rights violations, various ideas mix – the application of considered punishment, the encouragement of reconciliation, or a more open and direct acceptance of what actually happened, the necessary, cathartic confessional. The latter is the position most sought by human rights groups, the light on the hill that must be reached if a state is to move on and accept its standing as an international citizen.  This is certainly the imperfect model that has been embraced in the ad hoc tribunals on Rwanda and the Former Yugoslavia.

But absolutist criteria on human rights – and we have seen this in the context of assessing the brutality of a whole host of regimes – can be dangerous, destabilising and misplaced.  The unhappy medium is almost impossible to find.  Despite these reservations, it is impossible to assume that the right wing forces in Spain were not intent on barring Garzón from the legal arena.  He has proven to be a distinct nuisance to murderous figures in the past, and there is no reason why he should stop doing so in the future. His opponents have one clear wish: to make memory forget, to commit what amounts to a form of historiocide.

View the original article at

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Civil Rights and Privacy.

Tagged with , , , .

0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.


Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?