Skip to content


Pentagon Smears USA Today Reporters Investigating – Wait for It – Illegal Pentagon Propaganda



Pentagon Smears USA Today Reporters Investigating … Wait for It … Illegal Pentagon Propaganda

By WashingtonsBlog
washingtonsblog.com


Government Smears Journalists Who Investigate Government Corruption

Government agencies are monitoring social media for criticism.

They are also spying on U.S. journalists. See this, this, this and this:

(If the draconian Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) bill passes, the spying on journalists will only increase.)

They are also actively manipulating social media for propaganda purposes, to crush dissent (and see this), to help the too big to fail businesses compete against smaller businesses (and here), and to promote viewpoints which have nothing to do with keeping us safe.

We noted in 2009:

The U.S. government long ago announced its intention to fight the net .

As revealed by an official Pentagon report signed by Rumsfeld called Information Operations Roadmap :

The roadmap [contains an] acknowledgement that
information put out as part of the military’s psychological
operations, or Psyops, is finding its way onto the computer and
television screens of ordinary Americans.

Information intended for foreign audiences, including public
diplomacy and Psyops, is increasingly consumed by our domestic
audience, it reads.

Psyops messages will often be replayed by the news media for much
larger audiences, including the American public, it goes on.

***

Strategy should be based on the premise that the Department [of
Defense] will fight the net as it would an enemy weapons system .

Indeed, the Pentagon publicly announced years ago that it was considering using black propaganda in other words, knowing lies.

That includes smear campaigns against virtually anyone – foreign or domestic – who criticizes the government or threatens to report on illegal government activity.

Many popular bloggers – including Americans – who criticize the government have experienced such smear campaigns.

Even more interestingly, the Pentagon has apparently launched a massive smear campaign against USA Today reporters investigating … wait for it … unlawful domestic propaganda by the Pentagon:

A USA Today reporter and editor investigating Pentagon propaganda contractors have themselves been subjected to a propaganda campaign of sorts, waged on the Internet through a series of bogus websites.

Fake Twitter and Facebook accounts have been created in their names, along with a Wikipedia entry and dozens of message board postings and blog comments. Websites were registered in their names.

The timeline of the activity tracks USA Today’s reporting on the military’s information operations program ….

For example, Internet domain registries show the website
TomVandenBrook.com was created Jan. 7 just days after Pentagon reporter Tom Vanden Brook first contacted Pentagon contractors involved in the program. Two weeks after his editor Ray Locker’s byline appeared on a story, someone created a similar site, RayLocker.com, through the same company.

If the websites were created using federal funds, it could violate federal law prohibiting the production of propaganda for domestic consumption.

***

I find it creepy and cowardly that somebody would hide behind my name and presumably make up other names in an attempt to undermine my credibility, Vanden Brook said.

The activity is the work of what online reputation expert Andy Beal calls a determined detractor.

It’s like a machine gun approach. They re trying to generate as much online content as they can, he said. The person who’s behind this, we can give them a lot of credit here and assume they re very sophisticated
about reputation attacks.

***

This is the work of somebody who knows what they re doing. They have some experience of covering their tracks. This is probably not the first time they ve done something like this, said Beal, CEO of Trackur, an online reputation tracking service.

Some postings merely copied Vanden Brook‘s and Locker’s previous reporting. Others accused them of being sponsored by the Taliban. They disputed nothing factual in the story about information operations, Vanden Brook said.

On Feb. 8, as Vanden Brook continued to ask questions of contractors, a new Wikipedia user attempted to create an entry on him, alleging he gained worldwide notoriety for his misreporting of the 2006 Sago Mine disaster in West Virginia.

Early reports from the scene, relying on faulty information from the governor and mine operators said 12 of 13 miners were found alive, when in fact only one was. Many news outlets, including the Associated Press, the New York Times and USA Today, conveyed the inaccurate reports in early editions.

[S]imilar comments started populating Internet message boards and blogs. In one case, the fake @Tomvandenbrook Twitter account defended his Sago reporting to another apparently fake account.

Vanden Brook said he’s continuing to pursue the story. If they thought it would deter me from writing about this, they re wrong.

This is a clear attempt at intimidation that has failed, Locker said.

View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Internet, Politics.

Tagged with Americans, Internet, news, Pentagon.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Any support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

Please remember I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has been taken offline by their original hosters which would be unavailable for viewing if it wasn't for this site. Therefore I would kindly ask you to help support me so that the site can continue doing what I think is an important job as well as reporting on stories the mainstream media would rather you didn't know about. I personally think it is important to host material such as removed reports that show that even FOX News once repoted on Israeli spy rings following the 9.11 hijackers before September 11th Or publishing the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was removed from their site once they enacted some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power.

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation, especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful!


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php