Is The Pentagon Attack Finally Solved?
By Dark Politricks
I recently wrote an article titled “the Pentagon Attack” which contained a number of videos and unanswered questions regarding the events of 9.11. Although the main premise was regarding the attack on the Pentagon the essay also contained a number of points related to 9.11 as a whole. Therefore this article is purely a summary regarding the events surrounding the Pentagon attack.
If you have the time I suggest you watch all the following videos as together they can be used to make a reasonable conclusion about what really happened at the Pentagon.
Even if the first documentary has one conclusion please watch the second talk as it will explain the evidence piece by piece and can be used to explain why the first documentary comes to the conclusion it does.
Why is the Pentagon Attack such a point of contention?
There are a number of reasons why the events around the Pentagon attack needs resolving and to this day many theories exist to what actually happened at that building. Some of these points are:
1. The conflicting witness accounts. Some witnesses claim to have seen a plane fly over the building, some right into it. Others claim to have heard the explosion first and then seen a plane in the sky afterwards. Some claim to only have seen a small plane others a commercial airliner.
2. The physical evidence. Some photos used by investigators show a clean front lawn outside the official impact zone. Other photos show plane debris. Some witnesses claim to have walked through the holes in the wall and to have not seen any evidence of a plane at all. Others claim to have been picking plane debris off the grass.
3. Pilots and aircraft experts claim that the manoeuvre made by Nawaf Hazmi, the alleged terrorist, was too complicated and fast for even expert pilots to have made let alone an amateur with poor piloting skills. Pilots have tried replicating the attack in flight simulators and failed. Other people claim the flight path could have been made even if it would have meant a huge plane flying at high speeds just metres above the Pentagon lawn, something aircraft engineers suggest is impossible.
However the main reason the Pentagon attack remains a sore point in the story is that the US government has refused to release all the CCTV and camera footage which could clear up the events once and for all. They could choose to put all the conspiracy theories to bed by releasing all footage of the Pentagon attack.
Instead they have released 5 frames from one camera which shows nothing conclusive and this has been used by believers of the official story to beat 911 Truthers over the head with for years.
A lot of people see the Pentagon attack as a way to discredit the whole 911 Truth movement by claiming that they are ignoring physical evidence and witness accounts. If an investigator can be dismissed at the Pentagon then any theories over the WTC and even the whole event can be dismissed as well.
Any talk of missiles, no planes, holograms, lasers from space or mini nukes are all used to label anyone who looks into the events of 9.11 as crazy.
To the uninitiated it doesn’t matter if any of these theories have merits or not because just hearing them can make the whole movement look like tinfoil hat wearing loons. Due to that, people unwilling to question their government can easily dismiss any uncomfortable facts by using straw man arguments.
“If you believe a missile hit the Pentagon when witnesses saw a plane crash then any questions over whether the US government ignored intelligence can be ignored as well.”
Therefore questions about the evidence regarding the Pentagon needs to be looked at and answered if possible. Hopefully these two videos which look at the witness evidence in detail and then a talk by an ex Government official who slots all the pieces together will help.
The facts do not fit the evidence.
The impact zone that is supposedly where Flight 77 hit the Pentagon does not fit the evidence for a number of reasons.
1. The supposed impact zone is the first two floors of a wedge of the building that would have been impossible for a huge Boeing 757 to hit at 400 mph.
Not only could a plane not fly that fast and low to the ground without crashing first. The dimensions of the plane do not allow it to create such a small hole.
Many pilots, aircraft specialists, engine designers have all gone on record to state that the downforce of a large plane flying that fast and low to the ground would mean it would have crashed way before the walls of the Pentagon. If that had happened the grass outside the impact zone would have been scorched and covered with debris.
The whole plane would and could NOT have entered the walls of the building. It would have crumpled up on impact.
2. There is a lack of evidence outside this “official” impact zone. No big parts of nose cones, no huge multi-ton engines and no damage to the lawn in front of the damaged building.
In fact the debris which was found was further along the building in front of a totally different wedge. This is explained later.
The “official” impact zone of Flight 77 at the Pentagon
3. A plane is made from lightweight materials. It cannot punch its way through 3 rings of re-inforced concrete as it supposedly did at the Pentagon. The following video shows what happens when a plane going at the speed of 475 mph hits just one re-enforced concrete wall.
Notice how the wall remains solid and the plane disappears into small pieces. This speed is basically the same speed as Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
Witnesses Dispute Official Story
A number of witnesses who claim to have the seen the plane fly in towards the Pentagon provide contradictory evidence to the official story.
These are all people who have worked in the area of the Pentagon for years. Either Policemen, Arlington Cemetery workers or aircraft specialists from the Pentagon itself.
The official story relies on a Southern approach to the hole in the wall that is the supposed entry point for Flight 77. However all these witnesses claim to have witnessed:
-A north bound approach with the plane flying to the right (or over) the Navy Annex in a totally different manner to the official report which requires it to fly to the left of that building.
-A slower speed of the plane. Not a fast 450 mph plane approach as the official story claims.
-A plane that was wobbling, “banking” and correcting its angle – not a direct, fast, straight trajectory.
-All of these witnesses whilst in positions to see the plane come in admit they couldn’t see the impact. Most were running away from the direction of the planes impact, covered their heads or were not in a position to see the impact.
-All have refused to change their testimony since it has been revealed to them that it directly contradicts the official story and whilst many now refuse to give further interviews they claim their story is correct.
-The one piece of evidence which corroborates the official story is the testimony of a taxi driver, Lloyd England, who claims to have been hit by the tall light pole that was supposedly bent by the plane as it flew the official trajectory.
However lets leave aside the fact that a 450 mph plane hitting a bird can cause it to crash, let alone a large metal pole. The witness when confronted with his evidence and how it contradicts all other witness accounts tries to change his story to make it fit with the other statements. This is odd.
He is also caught off tape many times making contradictory statements to the location of his taxi in direct conflict with the physical evidence and photographs which prove his exact location on the day.
He refuses to admit his car was where it was photographed and off camera alludes to the fact that:
“It has nothing to do with the truth it’s his story”
“This is too big for me man this is a big thing”
“Man you know this is a world thing happening. I’m a small man.”
“I’m not supposed to be involved in this.”….”This is for other people, people who have money and all this kind of stuff.”
“I’m not supposed to be involved in this, I have nothing.”
“It was planned.”
He seems to be alluding to be part of a story he has no control over, “a small man in a rich mans story” and he seems to admit to being part of a “tale” to make the official theory fit the facts. His wife also works for the FBI, although whether that has any importance I do not know.
Watch the 9/11-The Pentagon Attack Documentary
The conclusion of the documentary is that the plane the witnesses saw didn’t hit the Pentagon.
They claim that the witnesses who saw the incoming plane should be believed over the official story as they all corroborate each other by stating the planes impact path was wildly different than the official path. The official path is required to make the first floor hole in the Pentagon the official impact zone.
Also the documentary concludes that because the witness statements prove a different trajectory for Fight 77 that it didn’t actually hit the building and instead flew over the building. They come to this conclusion because many of them couldn’t see the planes impact zone from their positions and many were running away from the Pentagon or ducking down to cover themselves.
This conclusion would fit with the official analysis of the flight data recorder from Flight 77 which shows a discrepancy between the altitude of the plane and the official story.
For Flight 77 to have to have hit the lamp-post which Lloyd England claims happened the plane would have had to have been 440 feet high! This is obviously an impossibility. This leads credence to the conclusion of the plane flying over and not into the Pentagon.
What is clear from this documentary and the witness statements is that the official story doesn’t even fit with the witness statements who are on record seeing a plane fly towards the Pentagon.
Ex Government Official Put Pieces Together
This is a talk from an ex Reagan administration official, Barbara Honegger, and she puts the pieces together meticulously to explain how the witnesses are right, the hole without debris is also correct and that a plane DID hit the Pentagon as well as FLY OVER IT.
An overview is this:
1. A plane, probably a drone painted in American Airlines colours, did fly into the Pentagon but it flew in the trajectory that the witnesses in the Citizen Investigation Team documentary claimed.
2. The drone was either destroyed before impact or hit the Pentagon causing all the debris that was found near the Heliport terminal. Remember this is NOT the official impact zone which is many yards around the building. Also any witnesses seeing a plane hit the Pentagon saw this first plane/drone hit the building not Flight 77 which flew over it.
3. The official impact zone was caused by explosives inside the building. This explains why there is no debris outside on the grass. No debris found inside and why witnesses who walked through the hole to safety claimed to see no evidence of a plane.
4. This second explosion WAS reported on TV, by witnesses and Pentagon employees. The official story had to make this second explosion the planes impact zone even though the timings were out and the flight path didn’t match with the witnesses or the flight data. However there is no logical or physical way the damage from this second explosion could have been caused by a huge Boeing 757 flying 400+ mph into the first floor of the Pentagon. A plane this large just cannot possibly fly that fast and low to the ground especially after hitting a steel lightpole. It also could not punch through 3 rings of concrete wall.
5. Therefore the cover-up involved making this 2nd impact zone the official entry point for the plane even though a plane could never punch its way through 3 huge concrete walls as the video above shows.
6. Flight 77 did in fact fly over the Pentagon which is why it’s flight recorder data shows a higher altitude than required for it to impact the building. Because this plane flew over the building and an earlier plane hit it we have a range of people who claim to have seen a plane hit the building and fly over it. In the confusion after the event the two planes could easily be combined into one and conflicting witness accounts put down to confusion.
7. This also explains perfectly how some witnesses could claim to see no evidence of a plane at the impact zone and why other people claim to have seen debris outide on the lawn. There were TWO impact zones. One from a plane (drone) and one from an explosion. The people who walked through the official impact zone and saw no plane debris were correct. The debris was at the first impact zone being collected from the lawn. Because the official impact zone was NOT where the plane actually hit the building NO debris was pictured outside. This is why we see all the “clean lawn” photos which has led to people claim that a missile or explosives were used instead. Remember the plane that did hit the Pentagon was at a different impact zone.
Watch the video below to see how she puts all the pieces together and provides the reason for the attack.
Without it, no declaration of war could be made, and none of the police state apparatus which has been implemented in the wake of the attack could have proceeded.
This means that the Pentagon attack WAS the main attack on 9.11.
As Barbara points out, it was George W Bush himself that said “it wasn’t until I saw the Pentagon attack that I realised the country was really at war.”
Therefore without a successful attack on the Pentagon the last ten years of war, the massive loss of liberties at home and the many dicatotorship like laws given to the President wouldn’t and couldn’t have been implemented.
Barbara Honegger Puts the 9.11 Pentagon attack pieces together
Whether you personally believe the 9.11 attacks were any of the following:
- Just as the offiicial story claims, a conspiracy by Saudi Arabian al-Qaeda terrorists and a massive failure of intelligence.
- An al-Qaeda attack that was co-opted by the Mossad/CIA and “allowed” to succeed. This was done by ensuring a massive war games drill held on the same day, stand down orders given to NORAD, clearance for known terrorists to enter the country through the CIA co-opted Jeddah consulate and possibly planted explosives to ensure total collapse of the WTC. Remember this was a global sign of Americas strength and it’s destruction caused maximum “national psychological distress” and created the neccessary national furor for war.
- A total black-ops false flag attack which used CIA owned patsies and al-CIA-duh agents to play the part of terrorists.
- Or something in-between.
It is important that the questions surrounding one of the most contentious parts of the day’s events are put into context and any discrepancies in witness evidence explained.
Hopefully the videos together go some way in showing how all the missing pieces can in fact be put together.
Some people think the attack was just a Boeing 757 flying a few feet from the ground into the first floor of the Pentagon whilst others believe it was a missile or bomb attack with no plane impacting the building at all.
These video’s show how the two points of view can be joined together.
If the physical evidence proves a plane that large could not fly that low to the ground and punch through 3 rings of concrete wall then something must be wrong.
However if in fact there were two impact zones, one from a plane the other from explosives, then this can both explain the lack of plane debris outside the official impact zone as well as explaining why many others claim plane debris was in fact found at the Pentagon.
Two different attacks, minutes apart can totally explain both the varying evidence and the differing witness statements.