Skip to content


Two Invasions – and One Truth

Two Invasions and One Truth – Crimea and Afghanistan: A comparative analysis

Antiwar.com
Justin Raimondo

No bombing, no casualties, no armed resistance, no “shock & awe” Crimea isnt so much an invasion as it is a hook-up.

If Russias retaking of a region it has held since the days of Catherine the Great is an invasion and it surely is then its an aggression of a new type. Perhaps we can call it a passive aggression, or even a pacific aggression, which might be defined as an invasion that has the tacit consent of those aggressed against. Even the Tatars noted in every Western news article as opponents of Russias annexation have apparently reconciled themselves to life in the Russian Federation, and are seeking autonomy within Crimea. That wouldnt even have been an option had they remained within Ukraine.

Its not exactly accurate to say the Russo-Ukrainian contretemps has resulted in absolutely no casualties there were some, but they werent in Crimea, and the victims didnt fall under fire from Russian guns. The first blood was spilled in Kiev, where the "Right Sector" neo-fascists opened fire in the Maidan, wounding the deputy mayor of Kiev and two others. Theres probably going to be more where that came from, as the Kiev coup leaders come into inevitable conflict with the ultra-nationalist militias that provided the muscle for the coup in the first place. Oh, but dont worry, because Jamie Kirchick says theyre "imaginary" fascists although I hear they were handing out racist newsletters.

While Crimea, the site of the Russian invasion, is calm, real chaos is enveloping western Ukraine, where the political factions are falling out among themselves and "Right Sector" and its ideological allies in Svoboda are now making their bid for power. The police are nowhere to be seen in Kiev, while armed Right Sector thugs prowl the streets dispensing "revolutionary justice" with crowbars, bats, and pilfered guns. With elections scheduled for May 25, rival oligarchs are maneuvering for position, hoping to win US/EU approval and cash grants from Western "democracy promotion" programs while the neo-fascists of Svoboda wait in the wings for their chance.

Speaking of Western cash, no sooner did the US start sending "nonlethal" aid to the Ukrainians in order to hold off an "imminent" Russian move into the eastern part of the country that never materialized than the Ukrainians began selling it on the Internet. This is how America promotes entrepreneurship!

Now behold another invasion, the American "liberation" of Afghanistan which, by any measure, wasnt (and isnt) anything other than an old-fashioned shock-and-awe kill- em-all invasion. No one really knows exactly how many deaths and other casualties were suffered by Afghan civilians and the Taliban: most casualty counting web sites only report US and allied deaths and wounded because after all were talking about the wilds of Afghanistan. However, its safe to say the number conservatively is in the tens of thousands, including those taken by US drone strikes (and the Taliban which habitually attacks civilians).

Like the Russians, the Americans have held an election (or two) since their conquest of the region: unlike the Russians, however, who offered Crimean voters a choice annexation or autonomy within Ukraine Afghan voters only got to choose between foreign occupation under one US sock-puppet or foreign occupation under another US sock-puppet. In the end, they chose Hamid Karzai, whose chaotic reign as de facto mayor of Kabul has been fraught with corruption and worse both for the US and the long-suffering Afghan people.

In Iraq, the contrast between "liberation" American style and Russian annexation is even starker. There the death toll exacted by the Americans easily tops one million, while the electoral process has been even more corrupted by Washingtons political agenda. Here we destroyed a nation in order to "save" it and we didnt even gain the geopolitical advantage of acquiring a compliant ally. Iraq is now firmly in the Iranian orbit after having asked us politely but firmly to leave. You have to give the Americans credit for actually withdrawing even though, in terms of domestic US politics, the Obama administration didnt have much choice in the matter.

In short, some aggressors are more aggressive than others: indeed, there is one in particular that tops the list. Some libertarians are quite uncomfortable with these difficult yet irrefutable truths. Theyd prefer we didnt talk about them. Anthony Gregory, writing in some obscure web site that nonetheless got picked up elsewhere, complains "Our unifying enemy should be the same: aggression, whether it is ordered from Moscow or Washington DC" and never mind the disproportionate death and destruction caused by the latter. Thats just a detail.

But is it? Doesnt it matter that the Russian "aggression" caused no loss of life and no real destruction of property not even a dented automobile? Doesnt that alter the tortured calculus that instructs us in who our "unifying enemy" should be?

Say a robber breaks into your house, steals your stuff, rapes your wife, mutilates your children and then burns the house down as hes leaving is that morally equivalent to a robber who steals into your home when youre not there, takes your old love letters and maybe your old model i-phone, and does no real damage?

Oh, but we arent supposed to notice these moral imbalances, because, after all, as Jim Antle a journalist I admire puts it, that would be "taking the other side." But what "side" are libertarians and all honest critics of US intervention abroad supposed to be taking the side of the US government, or the side of truth? Antle writes:

"The answer for American intervention skeptics isnt to pick a side. It is to say that this is not something the United States should become involved in militarily. We do not want or need another Cold War or a hot war with a nuclear-armed Russia. – 

" Antiwar conservatives and libertarians often fear that criticizing odious foreign regimes gives aid and comfort to those who use tyranny abroad to justify more military spending, bombings, and wars. But the opposite is the case: when opponents of U.S. military interventions appear to endorse, or at least deny obvious facts about, other governments interventions, it makes non-interventionist arguments less persuasive to most people."

Notice the double standard: who can deny the "obvious facts" about the bloodless Russian intervention in Crimea? Yet we are asked to do just that because, you see, noting these facts is "taking sides." So what Antle is really saying is we shouldnt notice these facts if they make the US government look bad but we should, indeed we must notice them if they make the "other side" look bad.

Theres also another important pointed glossed over by Antle: he says the Ukraine crisis is "not something the United States should become involved in militarily." But what about deploying "soft power," which is what happened in Ukraine? When we look at the facts to determine who is the real aggressor in this case we come up with a long and very public record of US intervention in Ukraine not bombing and droning, as in Iraq and Afghanistan, but ginning up internal turmoil ending in violence.

As the American public tires of endless overseas wars, the War Party is increasingly turning to political subversion of "rogue regimes" backed up, as always, by the implicit threat of force. Does this not count as aggression?

Thats why demands that libertarians condemn "Russian aggression" in Crimea miss the point entirely the point being that the Russian action was a response to US aggression against a democratically elected government which posed no threat to Americans. The President is right, for once, about this in the sense that the annexation, rather than being some glorious victory, was a confession of Russian weakness.

So, yes, its right to condemn the Russian action but not before denouncing the American acts of aggression that led directly to this resumption of cold war hostilities. And theres no question of condemning both equally, because its clear who started it.

What these "both sides are equally bad" libertarians and fellow-travelers are loath to admit is a simple fact of reality, underscored by the history of the world since September 11, 2001, and well before that, and it is this: the US government is the biggest, most consistent and deadliest aggressor the world has ever known. Washington not Moscow, or Beijing, or god help us Caracas is the main danger to peace and liberty in the world. It is our moral and political responsibility as libertarians to ceaselessly point this out no matter how many hand-wringers and wishful thinkers are bothered by it. To do anything less is to capitulate to the aggressive American nationalism that has had this country by the throat lo these many years.

The War Party is going to accuse us of being "anti-American" traitors in any event for the crime of opposing their latest regime-change crusade. Our "side" is the side of truth and let the chips fall where they may.

NOTES IN THE MARGIN

You can check out my Twitter feed by going here. But please note that my tweets are sometimes deliberately provocative, often made in jest, and largely consist of me thinking out loud.

Ive written a couple of books, which you might want to peruse. Here is the link for buying the second edition of my 1993 book, Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement, with an Introduction by Prof. George W. Carey, a Foreword by Patrick J. Buchanan, and critical essays by Scott Richert and David Gordon (ISI Books, 2008).

You can buy An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard (Prometheus Books, 2000), my biography of the great libertarian thinker, here.

Read the original article at Antiwar.com

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Politics, War on terror.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php