Skip to content

Jeb Bush: “People Need to Work Longer Hours.” Media Soften It.

Jeb Bush: “People Need to Work Longer Hours.” Media Soften It.

By Eric Zuesse.

Reuters & CNBC, Etc.: “Bush says Americans should have chance to work longer hours in improved economy.

Eric Zuesse

Jeb Bush, on July 8th:

My aspiration for the country, and I believe we can achieve it, is 4 percent growth as far as the eye can see. Which means we have to be a lot more productive, workforce participation has to rise from its all-time modern lows. It means that people need to work longer hours, and, through their productivity, gain more income for their families. That’s the only way we’re going to get out of this rut that we’re in.

Here is his statement in a youtube video of just that 30-second passage (+ 8 seconds):

Republican U.S. Presidential candidate Jeb Bush was interviewed in a grainy video on 8 July 2015, by New Hampshire’s far-right (i.e., authoritarian) newspaper, Manchester Union-Leader, which interview they buried on their website, but the newsworthy comment in it (cited just above) is at 16:11-16:40 on their buried and muddy-sounding 54-minute-long boring interview video here, where Bush had been asked about his plan for the U.S. economy.

In what follows, you will see the openings of the media reports about this statement by Bush. You will see news media trying to soften the candidates statement, by adding their own commentary to it, some of which commentary is outright false [and my own commentaries about the news reports about Bushs comment will be in brackets, like here]:


Bush says Americans should have chance to work longer hours in improved economy

[That headline is false. Bush did not say chance to work longer hours. Furthermore, instead of in improved economy, he said to get out of this rut that were in, so a euphemistic paraphrase was used instead of simply an honest quotation, which is only a few words longer than the paraphrase. Reuters apparently wants to provide its own softened interpretation, perhaps fearing that to provide an actual quotation instead would generate in the reader an interpretation thats less accepting of the basic aristocratic system, which the media are being paid to propagandize for.]

Thu Jul 9, 2015 3:23am BST. HUDSON, NEW HAMPSHIRE | BY STEVE HOLLAND Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush said Americans should have the chance to work longer hours, a remark that drew criticism from Democrats but which he said was intended to highlight that an improved U.S. economy could create more full-time jobs.

[That lead sentence is false. Bush did not say that Americans should have the chance to work longer hours. ]


Jeb Bush says Americans need to work longer hours to earn more

Reuters, Thursday 9 July 2015

Jeb Bush has said Americans should have the chance to work longer hours.

[That lead sentence is false. Guardian failed to verify the news report from Reuters.]


Jeb Bush: ‘People should work longer hours

[That headline is false. Bush did not say People should work longer hours.”

By HANNA TRUDO 7/8/15 10:05 PM EDT Updated 7/9/15 12:56 PM EDT

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush on Wednesday seemed to propose a bold solution for economic troubles: People should work longer hours.

[That lead sentence is false. Bush proposed no bold solution for economic troubles. And as noted about the headline he did not say People should work longer hours. ]


Jeb Bush: People need to work longer hours means they need full-time, not part-time work

By Ed OKeefe, July 8 at 8:45 PM. HUDSON, N.H. Jeb Bush raised eyebrows on Wednesday by suggesting that “people need to work longer hours” in order to grow the economy.

But he later clarified the comment, moving quickly to quell a fresh assault by Democrats eager to characterize the Republican presidential front-runner as out of touch.


Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton Spar Over Worker Hours

Alan Rappeport, Jul. 9, 2015, 8:44 AM ET The sparring between the presidential candidates Jeb Bush and Hillary Rodham Clinton has started early, and in this case the fight is over who better understands the plight of the American worker.

Mr. Bush caused a stir on Wednesday when he appeared to suggest in New Hampshire that Americans needed to start putting in more hours.

We have to be a lot more productive, Mr. Bush said, referring to how to 4 percent economic growth could be achieved. Work force participation has to rise form its all time modern lows, it means that people need to work longer hours and through their productivity gain more income for their families.

Democrats seized on the notion that Americans were not working hard enough. The former Florida governor, a Republican, later clarified his remarks, explaining that he was referring to the glut of part-time workers who have not been able to find full-time employment in the aftermath of the recession.


The general news coverage on Bushs remark was like the Post and the Times: it emphasized the criticisms that Hillary Clinton and some other Democrats had of Bushs statement, but buried and truncated Bushs statement itself, so that the predominant impression was: Democrats are lunging at Bush. The coverage was of the game, not of the policy-prescription itself, as if the public are too stupid to care about a Presidential candidates policy-prescription.


The news media treat well-financed political candidates as if they are fragile creatures who need to be protected from the stupid public, by clarifying what they really meant to say. And, then, when the opposite political party attacks, the news reporting is about the battle between the two parties, not about the battle between both of those parties (both wings of the U.S. aristocracy) versus the public.

Unlike the many other news reports about Bushs statement, the present one will not pollute Bushs statement with any commentary about it. His comment stinks enough on its own. As usual, the more important, and far more interesting, news is actually the corruptness of the news media, and the resulting difficulty for voters to make accurately informed electoral choices between the various candidates that the aristocracy offer us, which accurately informed choices might terrify the news media, if that were ever to happen. However, when the choice is between candidates such as the Bushes and the Clintons, or the Obamas and the Romneys, etc., the aristocracy have nothing whatsoever to worry about. And, if somehow an anti-aristocratic candidate were to win one of the two parties nomination, the aristocracy would probably still win, because they own the news media too. There are many things, such as Obamas trade deals, that the public dont like but that get democratically rammed through no matter what. What the public want doesnt make any real difference in America.

Any Presidential candidate who insults voters by asserting that the solution to the nations economic problems is People need to work longer hours, shouldnt even be in the race: hes not only a callous aristocrat; hes stupid, if not outright bigoted, and overflowing with blatant self-righteous arrogance.

And any news reporting of such a comment, that consists of either the political game-play, or else interpretation of the comment on the part of news media, isnt worthy of being printed onto even toilet paper. It should have less attention paid to it than that, and it stinks as bad. It simply shouldnt be touched. But the comment itself should receive lots of public attention, because it blatantly displays the candidates callous trashiness, which the news media are trying to hide from the public, as best they can.

So: dont expect to see this news-article and commentary published in many news media, though it has been submitted to virtually all of them. The news media always refuse to publish anything that exposes the fraudulence of our democratic free press. Exposing that is an absolute no-no, in the press.

Freedom of the press? Whats that? And where can one read about it? You just did here (and maybe its available noplace else).


Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of Theyre Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRISTS VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Finance & Economics, Mainstream Media, Politics.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , .

0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.


Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?