Skip to content


POLL: Americans’ Massive Disapproval of Both Parties

POLL: Americans’ Massive Disapproval of Both Parties

By Eric Zuesse.
washingtonsblog.com

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org

The Monthly Harvard-Harris Poll: June 2017 is the latest poll in that series, and it scientifically sampled 2,258 U.S. registered voters, of whom (as shown on page 30) 35% were Democrat, 29% were Republican, and 30% were independent ). It indicates (page 24) that 37% approve and 63% disapprove of the way the Republican Party is handling its job. It also indicates (page 25) that 38% approve, and 62% disapprove, of the way the Democratic Party is handling its job. So: despite there being 6% more self-described Democrat’s than Republican’s, there was only 1% more disapproval of the Republican Party than of the Democratic Party; and, this indicates that there was a substantial disapproval of the Democratic Party by Democratic voters (more disaffection by them for their Party, than by Republicans for theirs).

The answers to other questions in the poll also help to answer why this is so, and why the voting public dont hold either Party in high regard why Americas supposedly democratic (small-D ) politics is currently a contest between uglies, with neither Party offering anything like what the U.S. voting public want their government to do (i.e., it fits what this scientific study linked there found actually to control U.S. politics):

(Page 27) 41% think President Trump should be impeached and removed from office, and 45% think no action should be taken against him.

(Page 28) 36% think the investigations into Russia and President Trump are helping the country, but 64% think the opposite: that these investigations are hurting the country.

(Page 39) Of listed U.S. government officials, the highest percentage-favorable ratings were: Bernie Sanders (52%), Mike Pence (47%), Donald Trump (45%), Hillary Clinton (39%), Paul Ryan (38%), Elizabeth Warren (37%), Jim Comey (36%), Robert Mueller (34%), Nancy Pelosi (31%), Jeff Sessions (28%), and Rex Tillerson (28%).

(Page 40) The highest percentage-unfavorable ratings were: Hillary Clinton (56%), Nancy Pelosi (51%), Donald Trump (50%), Paul Ryan (45%), Mitch McConnell (42%), Jeff Sessions (41%), Mike Pence (40%), Jared Kushner (39%), Bernie Sanders (38%), Jim Comey (36%), and Elizabeth Warren (36%).

(Page 72) 48% think President Trump colluded with the Russians during the election over the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and John Podestas emails. 52% say No Trump did not do that.

(Page 73) 54% say associates of President Trump did it; 46% say No to that.

(Page 74) 38% say There is evidence of such collusion by Trump; 62% say No.

(Page 75) 54% say this is a legitimate investigation ; 46% say its fueled to create a cloud over the Trump administration.

(Page 79) 44% say Keep the focus on the Russia investigation ; 56% say Move on to other issues.

(Page 83) 73% say they are concerned that there has been lost focus and energy by the administration and Congress because of the Russia investigation. 67% say theyre concerned about future interference by Russia in U.S. elections.

(Page 95) 54% say Yes and 46% say No to Do you think the so called Deep State the collection of intelligence agencies and holdover government workers from the Obama administration is trying to unseat President Trump?

(Page 96) When asked Who do you think is more to blame for Hillary Clintons loss of the election? 67% choose Hillary Clinton and her campaign team for running a weak campaign and 33% choose Forces like the Russians, former FBI director Comey, and the Democratic National Committee not having reliable voter data.

(Page 124) 74% Favor Offering incentives for electric cars and renewable energy such as wind and solar. 62% Favor Setting much tougher emission standards for cars and other vehicles. 34% Favor Putting coal, and all coal and clean coal plants, out of business. Todays American public take global warming seriously or at least more seriously than Republican public officials do..

(Page 133) 47% think it was Right and 53% think it was Wrong for Trump to pull the United States out of the current version of the Paris Climate Agreement.”

(Page 151) 49% think the media is being fair to President Trump; 51% say Unfair.

(Page 154) 21% Favor raising the U.S. governments debt ceiling. 69% Oppose.

(Page 155) 36% Favor a government shut down over the issue; 64% Oppose.

What this poll found is basically the same thing that has been shown in many different polls. So: former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, who was the last person who was able to win the White House without needing to rely upon billionaries in order to do it, was correct when he said that, Now it’s just an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or being elected president. And the same thing applies to governors, and U.S. Senators and congress members. Anybody who refers to this government as being a democracy is way behind the times, because it has been, ever since 1980, controlled by its aristocracy; it is an oligarchy instead of a democracy; it is a regime instead of a government that represents its public. This regime represents its aristocrats. And that is why the publics disapproval of this countrys leaders is so high. That happens in a regime, not in a democracy. Both of Americas Parties represent this countrys aristocracy, not Americas public. The latest Harvard-Harris poll simply adds to the already-overwhelming evidence of this. But the basic evidence on the matter was the Gilens-Page study. In their section American Democracy? they said:

What do our findings say about democracy in America? They certainly constitute troubling news for advocates of populistic democracy, who want governments to respond primarily or exclusively to the policy preferences of their citizens. In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule at least not in the causal sense of actually determining policy outcomes. When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.

One of the aristocracys many magazines, The Atlantic, headlined on June 21st, Is American Democracy Really Under Threat? and tried to fool their readers to think the answer is no; but, of course, they were pointing, as evidence, merely to nominal adherence to democratic forms, and ignored the actual evidence on the matter, such as Gilens and Page examined in depth, and such as the many polls that have also been referred to in the links here have additionally reinforced. None of this actual evidence was even so much as mentioned. The honest answer to the articles title-question is not just Yes but more than that: their question itself is more like their having asked Is there a danger of the horse being stolen? after the horse was already stolen, and has for decades (since at least 1980) already been absent from the barn; so, that articles very title is a deception, even without its text (which is written for outright fools who cant recognize what constitutes evidence that is suitable for a given allegation). A better question would therefore be: Why do people still subscribe to vapid propaganda-magazines like that? All propaganda should be free of charge. But, of course, in a dictatorship like this, people pay even for the right to be deceived. Its no longer free-of-charge. Thats just the way things are really are. Its shown in the data not in anybodys mere platitudes about the matter. People pay to embellish the lies that they already believe. Most people want that, more than they want to come to know the truth. The worse the truth is, the more that people crave the myth which contradicts it theyll pay good money to mainline that into themselves: evidenceless reassurances, such as that article. But anyone who takes that type of pap seriously, wont be able sensibly to understand such findings as were reported in the latest Harvard-Harris poll.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of Theyre Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRISTS VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Politics, Public Figures, Russia.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php