Skip to content

Trump’s Fascism versus Obama’s Fascism

Trump’s Fascism versus Obama’s Fascism

By Eric Zuesse.

Eric Zuesse, as originally posted at The Saker

Barack Obama was the only U.S. President who at the United Nations defended nazism racist fascism and Holocaust-denial. It received almost no reporting by the press at the time (or subsequently). But his successor President Donald Trump could end up being removed from office because he said that racist fascists are just the same as are people who demonstrate publicly against them. Trumps politically stupid (not to say callous) remark became viral, and apparently the press (which had ignored Obamas defense of nazism at the U.N.) just wont let go of Trumps statement unless and until he becomes replaced by his even-more-far-right Vice President, Mike Pence.

Why is there this intense press-coverage of Trumps support of racist fascism, when there wasnt of Obamas (which was actually far more meaningful)? The answer comes closer if we ponder first a different question: How could the Republican Party, which is right-wing at its core, condemn a Democratic Party President who goes out of his way at the U.N. to protect todays nazis? That wouldnt be politically practical for Republican politicians to complain about (a Democrats being too far to the right); so, they didnt do it. Similarly, no Democrat will criticize a Republican for being too leftist. There may be a few exceptions, but thats the general rule: Successful politicians dont offend their base.

But that still doesnt fully answer why the press ignored it when Obama defended nazism at the U.N. The rest of the answer comes when we recognize that Americas press gets its cues from the two political Parties. If the opposition (and not just the Presidents own Party) is hiding something egregious that a President is doing or has done (such as happened there with Obama, and with many other conservative policies that Obama executed), then the press will hide it, too. Republicans werent calling attention to Obamas defense of nazism, because theyd then be offending some of their own supporters. (Democrats werent calling attention to it, because a Democrat was doing this, which didnt fit the progressive storyline.) And, if the opposition isnt pointing it out, then neither will the press. The matter will then just be ignored which is what happened. This was thus bipartisan non-reporting, of what Obama did. There was a lot of that while Obama was President.

In other words: Americas press are tools of, and are led by, the same people who actually, deep down, control both of Americas political Parties the billionaires. They control both politics, and also the press. Numerous social-science studies have shown that the wealthier a person is, the likelier that person is to be politically conservative at least to the extent that political conservatism doesnt threaten his or her particular business and financial interests. As Americas billionaires have come to control Americas politics, this country has been moving farther and farther to the right, except on the relatively few issues (such as immigration, gay rights, etc.) where their own economic interests are served better by a progressive position (or, at least, by a position that seems to most people to be progressive).

Trumps problem here is that hes too obviously playing to his Partys base. Obama didnt need to do that, because he had massive support from billionaires, and he was a much better liar than Trump, good enough to keep many progressive voters with him even after he had already shafted them in his actual policies. For example, when Obama dropped the public option as soon as he became elected, he was excused for it because most Americans thought he was simply being practical and avoiding an unnecessary conflict with the opposite Party in Congress. This view ignored that he gave up on it even as being a bargaining-chip to get concessions from congressional Republicans to drive new legislation to be more progressive. Obama had no interest in progressivism. Actually, Obama didnt want to offend his mega-donors. He thus handed the task of drafting the Obamacare law to the conservative Democrat, and public-option opponent, Max Baucus, instead of to the progressive Democrat and public-option supporter, Ted Kennedy, who desperately wanted (and expected) to have the opportunity to draft it.

Both Trump and Obama (in their actions, if not also in their words) are proponents of what Benito Mussolini called Corporationism big-corporate control of the government, which Mussolini more-commonly referred to as fascism. President Trump has been widely condemned both here in the U.S. and around the world (which his predecessor President Barack Obama never was), for his recent blatant statement equating the worst of fascists, which are racist fascists, as being comparable to the people who in Charlottesville Virginia had marched and demonstrated against racist fascists and who were violently attacked and one of them killed by racist fascists, against whom they had been protesting. Trump was equating anti-fascists with fascists, and he even equated racist fascists ideological nazis with the people who were protesting specifically against nazism. Apparently, the press wont let go of it. They treat this event as if top-level U.S. nazism were unprecedented in todays post-WW-II America as if this nation were still anti-nazi (as it had been in FDRs White House), and as if this incident with Trump says something only about Trump, and not also, and far more meaningfully, about todays American government, including Trumps own immediate predecessor-in-office, and also about Americas current press-institution, and about what it has become.

As this reporter had headlined on 24 November 2014, “U.S. Among Only 3 Countries at U.N. Officially Backing Nazism & Holocaust-Denial; Israel Parts Company from Them; Germany Abstains . Obama and his friend and U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power were unapologetic about having done that at the U.N., and Obamas U.N. representative continued in that vein. As I headlined a few months later, on 21 June 2015, “Americas U.N. Ambassador Continues Standing Up for Nazis . Both of those two news-articles were submitted to all of the U.S. and also to much of the European mainstream and additionally to some of the alt-news international-news media, but each of the two articles was published only in around a half-dozen of only alternative-news sites. The newsmedia (especially the mainstream ones) werent nearly as concerned about Obamas blatantly racist-fascist, and specifically anti-Russian, actions, as they are concerned today, about the current U.S. Presidents bending-over-backwards to retain his support from Americas racist-fascist or nazi voters, whom he apparently considers an essential part of his base. (Why else would he even say such a thing?)

Whereas Obama was imposing an actual nazi international campaign (via a violent anti-democratic coup, followed by an ethnic-cleansing campaign to cement it) in which his U.N. Ambassador played her necessary role, Trump was politically supporting an important portion of his voting-base, but not doing anything in actual policy-fact at the U.N. or anywhere else such as Obama had done. But the press focuses on Trump as if he were initiating the acceptability of nazism in the U.S. body-politic. Trump wasnt.

Obama had done something truly remarkable: he was the first U.S. President, since the pre-Civil-War U.S. had ended and U.S. President Abraham Lincoln courageously led this nation clearly and explicitly away from its deeply racist past, to support publicly, and to carry out in policy a clearly racist policy-initiative, a blatant ethnic-cleansing military campaign. It aimed to remove from Ukraines voter-rolls the residents of the areas of Ukraine where from 75% to 90% of the voters had voted for the democratically elected Ukrainian President whom Obama in February 2014 had just overthrown by hiring racist-facist gunmen to drive out of power that man whom those people had so heavily voted for, in what now turned out to have been Ukraines final democratic nationwide election. Unless Obama eliminated those voters ethnic Russians the far-right politicians whom he had placed into power after the U.S. coup wouldnt last through the first Ukrainian national election after the coup. Ethnic-cleansing was the only way to make Obamas coup-regime stick; so, thats what he wanted his Ukrainian stooges to do, and they tried their utmost to do it (and theyre still trying).

With all of the decades that have passed after World War II, not only Americans but also publics elsewhere, including publics in nations that America considers to be allies, such as Israel, seem to have lost any consciousness they might have had in the wake of Hitlers defeat, about what racist fascism what the ideology (and not just the German political party, where it had an initial capital letter) nazism actually was, and what it meant. It wasnt just anti-Semitic fascism that had been defeated in that war, but anti-Korean fascism, and anti-Chinese fascism, and anti-Russian fascism, and more forms of racist capitalistic dictatorship, the nazi ideology, which were defeated in WW II. During John F. Kennedys Presidency, the U.S. federal government very reluctantly started to deal with this countrys deepseated residual institutional racism against Americas Blacks; but, still, the ethnocentrism in America even among Blacks and Jews remained so pronounced, so that President Obama on 28 May 2014 could, without shame or any political embarrassment, tell the graduating class of future U.S. military leaders at West Point:

The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation. That has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the century to come.

But the world is changing with accelerating speed. This presents opportunity, but also new dangers. We know all too well, after 9/11, just how technology and globalization has put power once reserved for states in the hands of individuals, raising the capacity of terrorists to do harm. Russias aggression toward former Soviet states unnerves capitals in Europe, while Chinas economic rise and military reach worries its neighbors. From Brazil to India, rising middle classes compete with us, and governments seek a greater say in global forums. And even as developing nations embrace democracy and market economies, 24-hour news and social media makes it impossible to ignore the continuation of sectarian conflicts and failing states and popular uprisings that might have received only passing notice a generation ago.

It will be your generations task to respond to this new world. The question we face, the question each of you will face, is not whether America will lead, but how we will lead not just to secure our peace and prosperity, but also extend peace and prosperity around the globe.

Now, this question isnt new. At least since George Washington served as Commander-in-Chief, there have been those who warned against, foreign entanglements that do not touch directly on our security or economic wellbeing. Today, according to self-described realists, conflicts in Syria or Ukraine or the Central African Republic are not ours to solve. And not surprisingly, after costly wars and continuing challenges here at home, that view is shared by many Americans.

A different view from interventionists from the left and right says that we ignore these conflicts at our own peril; that Americas willingness to apply force around the world is the ultimate safeguard against chaos.

He said that all nations other than the U.S. are dispensable. He said that the BRICS countries and rising middle classes compete with us, and governments seek a greater say in global forums, and that It will be your generations task to respond to this new world. The question we face, the question each of you will face, is not whether America will lead, but how we will lead not just to secure our peace and prosperity, but also extend peace and prosperity around the globe. He said that conflicts in Syria or Ukraine or the Central African Republic are … ours to solve. He derided self-described realists who didnt share his international idealism, of his own nations seeking out, instead of warning against, foreign entanglements that do not touch directly on our security or economic wellbeing. He said that Americas willingness to apply force around the world is the ultimate safeguard against chaos, and that George Washington was wrong.

He was saying that Hitler and Hirohito were right; that they had merely led the wrong countries.

This man, who had just led the bloody coup and instigated the ethnic-cleansing campaign that forced two regions of the former Ukraine to secede from Ukraine and to seek instead Russias protection (and he then instituted sanctions against Russia for providing that protection to them), was there and then lecturing Americas future military leaders, to instruct them that they would have the right to invade dispensable countries, and to apply force around the world, in order to deal with the BRICS countries and rising middle classes [that] compete with us, and governments [that] seek a greater say in global forums. (He wanted none of that freedom for them.) He said that ignoring George Washington is the ultimate safeguard against chaos, and is somehow in accord with Americas values, even if not of George Washingtons values.

The ultimate insult was that this was coming from a man who considered himslef to be a Black as if he were somehow in the tradition of Martin Luther King, who had urged America to quit its invasion of Vietnam. Instead, Obama invaded and wrecked Libya, Syria, Ukraine, and Yemen.

Well, that wasnt actually quite the ultimate insult: the ultimate insult was that Blacks continued to believe in him, and never turned against that nazi. They evidently keep what some of them call (as if it were a racial trait) White mans values.

Values are not a racial trait, but stupidity and small-mindedness are the human norm everywhere, and no nation is indispensable far less, is any the one indispensable nation: not ancient Rome, not Germany, not Japan, not the U.S. none, at all.

That statement by Obama to Americas future military leaders, was only verbal, but its underlying value-system is clearly fascist. When Obama defended racist fascism at the United Nations, it wasnt by any such mere speech, but by his actual actions, at the U.N., carried out there by his friend and U.N. Ambassador, Samanta Power, as I reported on 24 November 2014. To an intelligent person, actions speak far more convincingly about a person than that individuals mere words do. Obamas defense of nazism at the U.N. was a stunning action by him (via his agent), which made unequivocally clear what his actual values were. Obama there and then set a new precedent, established a new low, as to how bad an actor in the international community, the U.S. had become the depths to which this nation has sunk, after it had performed such an important and very positive role in helping to defeat nazism during World War II this was a complete reversal of Americas position, on the basic issue of that war, which issue was nazism itself.

Trumps foreign policies seem to be mainly aiming to out-do his predecessors. But, in no way is Trump yet the nazi that Obama proved himself to be. Trump could turn out to be that bad, if the people who are urging him to intensify Americas war against Russia and/or against Iran have their way. The neoconservatives (the foreign-policy ideology thats sponsored by Americas billionaires of both the Republican and the Democratic Parties) seem still to be basically in control. Trump nonetheless could turn out to be the idealist that Obama, Hitler, and Hirohito, were, but theres at least the possibility that he will instead turn out to be one of the self-described realists whom Obama had derided. Trump hasnt yet exposed his true self, to the extent that Obama did during his eight years. But the newsmedia are already calling Trump a White racist. First (and even before Trump was elected), Democrats, and most billionaires, and their newsmedia, demagogued that Trump is unfit for the Presidency (and that the super-neoconservative Hillary Clinton must be elected instead) because Trump is Putins stooge. Now, its because Trump is a nazi, or because hes insane, so theyre urging that Trump be replaced by his Vice President Mike Pence. It seems that the people who cheered-on Obamas nazism (except when they said that Obama was being too cautious about it) dont like Trump, at all.

But, are Americas billionaires really that eager to replace Trump by Pence? One might wonder how far this campaign will go.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of Theyre Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRISTS VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.


View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Civil Rights and Privacy, Middle East, Politics, Revolutions & Coups, Russia, Syria.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/


Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?

0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.