Skip to content


What America’s Aristocracy Want

What America’s Aristocracy Want

By Eric Zuesse.
washingtonsblog.com

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org

The American aristocracy want inequality of rights, with two basic polar-opposite classes: the elite, with themselves at the top of everything, and everybody else below them, as subjects to be ruled by them, in such ways as they (themselves, and their fellow elite) can agree to do. They are convinced that they have earned their high status, in one way or another, and they compete ferociously amongst themselves, to rise even higher within the aristocracy.

Many of the aristocrats think that they are elite because they are the richest; many think instead that the elite are the smartest or the most cunning; and, a third group think that the elite are the well-born who descended from superior people they believe in an inherited elitist version of Hitlers generic racist vision, of the Aryans versus the non-Aryans. Instead of being such racists, however, this third category are simply classists, who define their aristocratic rights as being inherited from their ancestors so, theyre similar to racists, insofar as they are obsessed with geneaology (like racists are), but their obsession is focused instead upon their own family, not upon any race at all. They come from the right family, not from the right race. This third type of aristocrat believe in inherited rights and obligations. They believe that they possess an inherited right to control the public the non-aristocrats (the lower class).

In whichever of the three ways that a member of the elite might happen to see the elite as being constituted, they all agree together, that an elite, which includes themselves, should rule (and should have more rights than) the ruled, and that everyone else (the public) should obey, or else be punished for not doing their duty to obey, their superiors.

All of the aristocrats thus favor the aristocracy against the public. It is their solidarity, which binds them together, and which causes them to relate personally only to others of their type, and to view everyone else as being either their agents, or else their enemies but not part of the aristocracy.

This hierarchical view has been the case for the aristocracy, ever since the dawn of civilization, and it is the case also today. Aristocrats are continually social-climbing : they can never have enough power, and enough authority, to satisfy themselves. What food and air are to everyone, power and authority additionally are to aristocrats they are people who need power and authority just like everyone needs food and air. Non-aristocrats arent necessarily concerned at all about dominance-submission, but a person cant be and behave as an aristocrat unless the persons ideology is dominance-submission, inequality of rights. Aristocrats view themselves as being especially entitled.

Here, then, is a small example, in America, of how this universal system, of maintaining hierarchy and a corresponding inequality of rights, works:

Ron Unz, the publisher of the American Conservative magazine and of the news-and-commentary site, unz.com, republished on Labor Day, September 4th, his liberal article, which the neoliberal-neoconservative New America Foundation (which will be discussed here) had originally published on 19 November 2012, “Raising American Wages…By Raising American Wages . This is an ordinary liberal article, not a neoliberal one; so, it struck me as being out-of-place, and I looked up Unz at that Foundations site and discovered that this article has been his only contribution there, and that, unlike other writers there, he was assigned no title there, not even intern. Hes listed under Our People, but with no information regarding how hes one of Our People, other than that he wrote this article (which isnt even present now at the Foundations website just the title of it is posted there, along with his name, under Our People ).

In 1994, Unz competed in the California Republican Gubernatorial primary against the incumbent Republican Governor Pete Wilson, who won. Unz claims an IQ of 214, and he believes strongly that the elite should consist of the most-intelligent people (such as he considers himself to be); so, hes at odds against the pure libertarians or neoliberals, who believe instead that the elite should be the most-successful, the winners, the wealthiest people, the billionaires, who are presumed (by libertarians) to be the hardest-working people, and also to be the most intelligent ones (regardless whether by inheritance or otherwise).

The Foundations Board of Directors is entirely neoliberal-neoconservative (that being the global aristocracys ideology, in our time: todays version of conservatism). The two co-Chairs are Reihan Salam, Executive Editor of National Review; and, Jonathan Soros, Chief Executive Officer of JS Capital Management LLC, which started on 16 June 2017. Prior to that, Jonathan had been at his father, George Soross, Soros Fund Management. National Review was created by William F. Buckley Jr., the eldest son of oil company lawyer turned oil tycoon William F. Buckley Sr. Of course, Jonathan Soros is a son of the billionaire George Soros. So: at the very top of the Foundation are two individuals who either descended from great wealth, or else were selected by people who were. This is standard practice for how aristocratic organizations are run: totally top-down, with as little input from employees as possible.

The other two top members of the Board include:

Anne-Marie Slaughter, President & CEO of New America: From 2009 2011, she served as director of policy planning for the United States Department of State. Dr. Slaughter is a contributing editor to the Financial Times and writes a bi-monthly column for Project Syndicate. She provides frequent commentary for both mainstream and new media and curates foreign policy news for over 140,000 followers on Twitter. Foreign Policy magazine named her to their annual list of the Top 100 Global Thinkers in 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012. As The Nation magazine (which is liberal, with a bit even of progressivism) described on 2 May 2014 the aptly named Slaughter, she was a former State Department official [who] says that the way to stop Putin in Ukraine is to bomb Syria. She thinks that the Syrian public who overwhelmingly believe that the U.S. Government is their nations main enemy and the chief government responsible for bringing tens of thousands of jihadists into their country to overthrow their Government need to be bombed more by America. She thinks that were not bombing Syria enough (to overthrow their sovereign Government). However, Slaughters type of thinking neoconservatism, specifically is almost universal amongst the American aristocracy; and, so, they choose individuals such as she, to run their political operations (including think-tanks). This is the way a Foundation wins the necessary big donations, such as from the top stockholders in Lockheed Martin. For example, Bernard Schwartz sold his company to Lockheed Martin for $9.1 billion in 1996, and thereby became perhaps the top investor in Lockheed Martin, and he was listed in the 2013 New America Foundation annual report as having donated $250,000-$999,999 during 2012. The top donors during 2015, each having donated at least a million dollars that year, included the Ford Foundation, Hewlett Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Soross Open Society Foundation, and three separate foundations that had each been established by Eric Schmidt and his Google Inc. Starting in 2011, Schmidt had assisted Hillary Clintons State Department (including Anne-Marie Slaughter) to plan the coup that in 2014 overthrew Ukraines democratically elected President, and thereby provoked the breakaway of Crimea and Donbass, two former regions of Ukraine, which had voted, respectively, 75% and 90%, for the President whom U.S. President Obama had just overthrown. They refused to be ruled by a U.S. stooge-regime. (Obama then slapped sanctions against Russia for assisting those people.) On 30 August 2017, the New York Times bannered Google Critic Ousted from Think Tank and reported that when Schmidt complained about that critic of Google, an employee at New America Foundation, Dr. Slaughter fired the individual. However, the employee refused to go quietly. The Foundations donors-list includes almost all of the U.S. Bilderbergers and Trilateralists the proponents of control, over the world, by the U.S. aristocracy, a global Pax Americana, with the U.S. military serving as the policeman for the world (in the interests of Americas aristocracy, of course), and, consequently, lots of weapons-sales for U.S. firms. Its the neoliberal neoconservative jobs-plan for the American public.

David G. Bradley, Secretary of New America: Mr. Bradley is chairman of Atlantic Media Company, whose holdings include The Atlantic, Quartz, National Journal, National Journal Daily, The Hotline, Government Executive Media Group, and Atlantic Media Strategies. At the age of 26, he launched his first company, the Advisory Board Company, a for-profit think tank ultimately serving 4,000 corporations, financial institutions, and medical centers around the world. His particular specialty is sales-promotion for U.S. defense contractors (of which Lockheed Martin is #1) thats to say: war-promotion.

A number of the other top people (Board members) at New America Foundation, are strong proponents of an aristocracy of merit instead of just wealth. Reihan Salam, who was born to educated middle-class immigrants, is one. Another of the regular Directors, the financier and scholar Zachary Karabell, likewise worked his way up, and consequently is a prominent proponent of the liberal goal of an elite who are not only well-educated but also natively exceptionally smart. So too is Ron Unz, who founded a movement at Harvard to abolish college tuition” and to admit all students on the basis of pure merit (such as themselves persons who didnt get admitted as legacy or alumni-family admittees).

Among the other regular Directors of New America are: David Brooks, Fareed Zakaria, Walter Russell Mead, and James Fallows.

All of the Board, so far as I am aware, are both neoliberal and neoconservative, and there is no one on the Board who opposes Americas being, by far (as is widely believed around the world), the country that represents the greatest threat to peace in the world today .

In other words, what Americas aristocracy want is to conquer the entire world. Destroying Iran, Guatemala, Chile, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Ukraine, isnt enough for them. But in order to do that, they first need to conquer the American public, such as by preventing a progressive, or even Bernie Sanders, from becoming, or serving as, the U.S. President. Neither the Republican nor the Democratic aristocrats want that, at all.

And, Googles Eric Schmidt served as the brains behind Hillary Clintons entire Presidential campaign (though John Podesta is widely credited in the aristocracys newsmedia as having done that). On 22 November 2016, Forbes reported, in praise of the neoliberal-neoconservative son-in-law of Donald Trump, Jared Kushner is the biggest surprise of the 2016 election, adds Eric Schmidt, the former CEO of Google, who helped design the Clinton campaigns technology system. Best I can tell, he actually ran the campaign and did it with essentially no resources. Schmidt himself knew better he knew that Stephen Bannon, who had been supplied to Trumps campaign by Trumps earliest and biggest two donors, Robert Mercer of Cambridge Analytica, and Peter Thiel of Palantir Technologies, ran Trumps data-analysis and strategy operation; and that, as Carole Cadwalladr of Britains Guardian reported on 7 May 2017, Eric Schmidts daughter had introduced the head of SCL Elections, to Thiels Palantir Technologies. Robert Mercers daughter Rebekah was also important, as the person who was the most directly involved with selling Trump on Bannon, to become his strategist. This is how Mercer and Thiel set Bannon up with the expertise and systems of both Mercers and Thiels companies, Cambridge and Palantir, through daughters of two billionaire IT investors, the Democrat Schmidt, and the Republican Mercer. (As for SCLs contribution, that company was founded and is run by Nigel Oakes, whose specialty is deceiving people about everything including himself; so, SCLs contribution to Trumps campaign, other than that of Cambridge Analytica itself, which is jointly owned by both Mercer and Oakes, isnt at all clear. What is clear has been best summarized in this passage from Jane Mayers 27 March 2017 New Yorker article, THE RECLUSIVE HEDGE-FUND TYCOON BEHIND THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY: How Robert Mercer exploited Americas populist insurgency :

As far back as 2012, Bannon was the Mercers de-facto political adviser. Some people who have observed the Mercers political evolution worry that Bannon has become a Svengali to the whole family, exploiting its political inexperience and tapping its fortune to further his own ambitions. It was Bannon who urged the Mercers to invest in a data-analytics firm. He also encouraged the investment in Breitbart News, which was made through Gravitas Maximus, L.L.C., a front group that once had the same Long Island address as Renaissance Technologies [the stellar hedge fund co-led by the math geniuses James Simons and Robert Mercer]. In an interview, Bannon praised the Mercers strategic approach: The Mercers laid the groundwork for the Trump revolution. Irrefutably, when you look at donors during the past four years, they have had the single biggest impact of anybody, including the Kochs.

Last summer, Bannon and some other activists whom the Mercers have supported including David Bossie, who initiated the Citizens United lawsuit came together to rescue Trumps wobbly campaign. Sam Nunberg, an early Trump adviser who watched Mercers group take over, said, Mercer was smart. He invested in the right people.

Bannon and Rebekah Mercer have become particularly close political partners. Last month, when Bannon denounced the corporatist, globalist media at the Conservative Political Action Conference, in his first public appearance since entering the White House, Rebekah Mercer was part of his entourage. Bannon supports some initiatives, such as a major infrastructure program, that are anathema to libertarians such as Robert Mercer. But the Wall Street Journal has described Bannon joking and swearing on the deck of the Mercers yacht, the Sea Owl, as if he were a member of the family. Bannon assured me that the Mercers, despite all their luxuries, are the most middle-class people you will ever meet.

Bannon understands the difference between authentic populism, which Bernie Sanders was leading, and which would have won the U.S. Presidency if the Democratic National Committee hadnt stolen the primary contest for Hillary Clinton to become the Partys nominee stolen the race during the primaries versus fake populism, such as Bannon himself was running, in order to get Trump elected. (He was running, that is, the type of populism that can attract some of the heavy thumbs on the scale for their side, in this democracy, courtesy of Americas most-cunning billionaires.)

Americas aristocracy buy newsmedia in order to prevent such outcomes as an authentic populist (a progressive) winning the Presidency. So, that hasnt happened since the time of FDR, after the great Republican Crash of 1929. Today, the U.S. is more like the worlds leading fascist nation than like one of the worlds leading anti-fascist ones. Fascism is among the many fake forms of populism, and cannot exist at all without huge secret and financial support from the aristocracy. In the modern world, after the end of feudalism, all that the aristocracy want is fascism. In the old days, it was feudalism they wanted; but, now, its fascism.

And, they are even willing to endorse outright nazism racist fascism when it serves their purpose. Such circumstances, however, rarely occur.

Empirical studies in the social sciences show generally that the richer and more successful a person is, the more he/she tends to be psychopathic. There is nothing exceptional about Americas aristocracy, except that it tends to be the richest and the most successful one of all.

CLARIFICATIONS: A reader-comment elsewhere, thats full of misunderstandings of this article, stated:

There is nothing populist about fascism. Fascism is a form of totalitarian socialism that eschews public ownership of the means of production but rather co-opts industry to do its bidding without the ruling thugs having to bother with the details of production and commerce. Thus, the aristocrats (moneyed interests) do not want fascism because that means they would be at the beck and call of the ruling thugs. No. What they want is crony capitalism in which, as now, they hold the whip hand. To think of government (or the people) as calling the shots now is be out of touch.

This article doesnt assert that fascism is populist, but fascism is fake- populist; and, the original Nazi Partys constant emphasis upon the German Volk or People, was a prominent example of that populism. Of course, every fascist party is actually, as Mussolini himself acknowledged, corporationist, and therefore represents the aristocracy, not the public. Furthermore, saying the aristocrats (moneyed interests) do not want fascism because that means they would be at the beck and call of the ruling thugs, entails two misunderstandings. First, the aristocrats (moneyed interests are, themselves, the ruling thugs, who control the front-people or politicians. Secondly, any aristocracy, in the modern world, wants fascism, because what feudalism was to the agrarian era, fascism is to the industrial era: the aristocracys (the billionaires) control of the government. Fascism is merely the modern form of feudalism. Whereas in feudalism, the aristocracy aimed for control over physical land (landed estates ), it now aims for control over international corporations which, in turn, control the aristocracys government, and thereby also strongly influence foreign governments. And, of course, if a country is democratic (ruled by the public) instead of fascistic, then the aristocracy doesnt control it. But todays America is a fascism, not a democracy.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of Theyre Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRISTS VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Middle East, Politics, Revolutions & Coups, Russia, Syria.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php