Skip to content


Blaming Russia for the Internet ‘Sewer’

Blaming Russia for the Internet Sewer

By WashingtonsBlog
washingtonsblog.com

By Robert Parry, the investigative reporter who many of the Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s. Originally published at Parrys Consortium News (republished with permission).

With the U.S. government offering tens of millions of dollars to combat Russian propaganda and disinformation, its perhaps not surprising that we see researchers such as Jonathan Albright of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University making the absurd accusation that the Russians have basically turned [the Internet] into a sewer.

Ive been operating on the Internet since 1995 and I can assure you that the Internet has always been a sewer in that it has been home to crazy conspiracy theories, ugly personal insults, click-bait tabloid news, and pretty much every vile prejudice you can think of. Whatever some Russians may or may not have done in buying $100,000 in ads on Facebook (compared to its $27 billion in annual revenue) or opening 201 Twitter accounts (out of Twitters 328 million monthly users), the Russians are not responsible for the sewage coursing through the Internet.

Americans, Europeans, Asians, Africans and pretty much every other segment of the worlds population didnt need Russian help to turn the Internet into an informational sewer. But, of course, fairness and proportionality have no place in todays Russia-gate frenzy.

After all, your non-governmental organization or your scholarly think tank is not likely to get a piece of the $160 million that the U.S. government authorized last December to counter primarily Russian propaganda and disinformation if you explain that the Russians are at most responsible for a tiny trickle of sewage compared to the vast rivers of sewage coming from many other sources.

If you put the Russia-gate controversy in context, you also are not likely to have your research cited by The Washington Post as Albright did on Thursday because he supposedly found some links at the home-d cor/fashion site Pinterest to a few articles that derived from a few of the 470 Facebook accounts and pages that Facebook suspects of having a link to Russia and shut them down. (To put that 470 number into perspective, Facebook has about two billion monthly users.)

Albrights full quote about the Russians allegedly exploiting various social media platforms on the Internet was: Theyve gone to every possible medium and basically turned it into a sewer.

But lets look at the facts. According to Facebook, the suspected Russian-linked accounts purchased $100,000 in ads from 2015 to 2017 (compared to Facebooks annual revenue of about $27 billion), with only 44 percent of those ads appearing before the 2016 election and many having little or nothing to do with politics, which is curious if the Kremlins goal was to help elect Donald Trump and defeat Hillary Clinton.

Even former Clinton political strategist Mark Penn has acknowledged the absurdity of thinking that such piddling amounts could have any impact on a $2.4 billion presidential campaign, plus all the billions of dollars worth of free-media attention to the conventions, debates, etc. Based on whats known about the Facebook ads, Penn calculated that the actual electioneering [in battleground states] amounts to about $6,500.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed on Monday, Penn added, I have 40 years of experience in politics, and this Russian ad buy mostly after the election anyway, simply does not add up to a carefully targeted campaign to move voters. It takes tens of millions of dollars to deliver meaningful messages to the contested portion of the electorate.

Puppies and Pokemon

And, then there is the curious content. According to The New York Times, one of these Russian-linked Facebook groups was dedicated to photos of adorable puppies. Of course, the Times tried hard to detect some sinister motive behind the puppies page.

Similarly, CNN went wild over its own discovery that one of the Russian-linked pages offered Amazon gift cards to people who found Pok mon Go sites near scenes where police shot unarmed black men if you would name the Pok mon after the victims.

Its unclear what the people behind the contest hoped to accomplish, though it may have been to remind people living near places where these incidents had taken place of what had happened and to upset or anger them, CNN mused, adding:

CNN has not found any evidence that any Pok mon Go users attempted to enter the contest, or whether any of the Amazon Gift Cards that were promised were ever awarded or, indeed, whether the people who designed the contest ever had any intention of awarding the prizes.

So, these dastardly Russians are exploiting adorable puppies and want to remind people about unarmed victims of police violence, clearly a masterful strategy to undermine American democracy or according to the original Russia-gate narrative to elect Donald Trump.

A New York Times article on Wednesday acknowledged another inconvenient truth that unintentionally added more perspective to the Russia-gate hysteria.

It turns out that some of the mainstream medias favorite fact-checking organizations are home to Google ads that look like news items and lead readers to phony sites dressed up to resemble People, Vogue or other legitimate content providers.

None of the stories were true, the Times reported. Yet as recently as late last week, they were being promoted with prominent ads served by Google on PolitiFact and Snopes, fact-checking sites created precisely to dispel such falsehoods.

There is obvious irony in PolitiFact and Snopes profiting off fake news by taking money for these Google ads. But this reality also underscores the larger reality that fabricated news articles whether peddling lies about Melania Trump or a hot new celebrity or outlandish Russian plots are driven principally by the profit motive.

The Truth About Fake News

Occasionally, the U.S. mainstream media even acknowledges that fact. For instance, last November, The New York Times, which was then flogging the Russia-linked fake news theme, ran a relatively responsible article about a leading fake news Web site that the Times tracked down. It turned out to be an entrepreneurial effort by an unemployed Georgian student using a Web site in Tbilisi to make some money by promoting pro-Trump stories, whether true or not.

The owner of the Web site, 22-year-old Beqa Latsabidse, said he had initially tried to push stories favorable to Hillary Clinton but that proved unprofitable so he switched to publishing anti-Clinton and pro-Trump articles, including made-up stories. In other words, the Times found no Russian connection.

The Times article on Wednesday revealed the additional problem of Google ads placed on mainstream Internet sites leading readers to bogus news sites to get clicks and thus advertising dollars. And, it turns out that PolitiFact and Snopes were at least unwittingly profiting off these entrepreneurial ventures by running their ads. Again, there was no claim here of Russian links. It was all about good ole American greed.

But the even larger Internet problem is that many reputable news sites, such as AOL, lure readers into clicking on some sensationalistic or misleading headline, which takes readers to a story that is often tabloid trash or an extreme exaggeration of what the headline promised.

This reality about the Internet should be the larger context in which the Russia-gate story plays out, the miniscule nature of this Russian meddling even if these suspected links to Russia as the Times initially described the 470 Facebook pages turn out to be true.

But there are no lucrative grants going to researchers who would put the trickle of alleged Russian sewage into the context of the vast flow of Internet sewage that is even flowing through the esteemed fact-checking sites of PolitiFact and Snopes.

There are also higher newspaper sales and better TV ratings if the mainstream media keeps turning up new angles on Russia-gate, even as some of the old ones fall away as inconsequential or meaningless (such as the Senate Intelligence Committee dismissing earlier controversies over Sen. Jeff Sessionss brief meeting with the Russian ambassador at the Mayflower Hotel and minor changes in the Republican platform).

Saying False Is True

And, there is the issue of who decides whats true. PolitiFact continues to defend its false claim that Hillary Clinton was speaking the truth when in referencing leaked Democratic emails last October she claimed that the 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyberattacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin, and they are designed to influence our election.

That claim was always untrue because a reference to a consensus of the 17 intelligence agencies suggests a National Intelligence Estimate or similar product that seeks the judgments of the entire intelligence community. No NIE or community-wide study was ever done on this topic.

Only later in January 2017 did a small subset of the intelligence community, what Director of National Intelligence James Clapper described as hand-picked analysts from three agencies the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation issue an assessment blaming the Russians while acknowledging a lack of actual evidence.

In other words, the Jan. 6 assessment was comparable to the stovepiped intelligence that influenced many of the mistaken judgments of President George W. Bushs administration. In stovepiped intelligence, a selected group of analysts is closeted away and develops judgments without the benefit of other experts who might offer contradictory evidence or question the groupthink.

So, in many ways, Clintons statement was the opposite of true both when she said it in 2016 and later in 2017 when she repeated it in direct reference to the Jan. 6 assessment. If PolitiFact really cared about facts, it would have corrected its earlier claim that Clinton was telling the truth, but the fact-checking organization wouldnt budge even after The New York Times and The Associated Press ran corrections.

In this context, PolitiFact showed its contempt even for conclusive evidence testimony from former DNI Clapper (corroborated by former CIA Director John Brennan) that the 17-agency claim was false. Instead, PolitiFact was determined to protect Clintons false statement from being described for what it was: false.

Of course, maybe PolitiFact is suffering from the arrogance of its elite status as an arbiter of truth with its position on Googles First Draft coalition, a collection of mainstream news outlets and fact-checkers which gets to decide what information is true and what is not true for algorithms that then will exclude or downplay whats deemed false.

So, if PolitiFact says something is true even if its false it becomes true. Thus, its perhaps not entirely ironic that PolitiFact would collect money from Google ads placed on its site by advertisers of fake news.

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Finance & Economics, Internet, Mainstream Media, Politics, Russia.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , .


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?



css.php