Skip to content


How the U.S. Aristocracy Deceive the U.S. Public

How the U.S. Aristocracy Deceive the U.S. Public

By Eric Zuesse.
washingtonsblog.com

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org

The progressive former Democratic U.S. Senator Ted Kaufman wrote at Forbes, on 22 July 2014:

Another year has passed with no one from a Wall Street bank going to jail for the criminal behavior everyone knows helped cause the financial crisis. Fines against Wall Street banks are reaching $100 billion, but all will be paid by stockholders. Bank CEOs and managers pay no fines and face no prison.

There has been no reform zilch, nada of the credit-rating agencies. They are right back rating securities from issuers who pay them for their ratings.

If you still cant trust the credit-rating on a bond, and if Wall Streets bigs still stand immune from the law even after the 2008 crash they had played a huge role to cause, then in what way can the U.S. Government itself be called a democracy?

Kaufman tries to get the American public interested in overcoming the U.S. Governments profound top-level corruption, but few U.S. politicians join with him on that, because only few American voters understand that a corrupt government (especially one thats corrupt at the very top) cannot even possibly be a democratic government.

However, Americas aristocracy are even more corrupt than Wall Street itself is, and they control Wall Street, behind the scenes. And their newsmedia are under strict control to portray America as being still a democratic country that somehow lives up to its anti-aristocratic and anti-imperialistic Founders intentions and Constitution. Maybe all that remains of those Founders intentions today is that Britains aristocracy no longer rules America but Americas aristocracy now does, instead. And, this isnt much, if any, of an improvement.

Although the U.S. aristocracy Americas billionaires and centi-millionaires are the principals, and Wall Street are only their financial representatives (rather than the aristocracy itself), Wall Street was blamed by liberals for the 2008 economic crash; and, of course, Wall Street did do lots of dirty work deceiving outside investors and many home buyers and others in order to extract from the public (including those much smaller investors) the hundreds of billions of dollars that the U.S. aristocracy and its big-finance agents drew in pay and bonuses and other ways, from these economic extractions. But the aristocrats themselves emerged unscathed, even in their reputations, and were mainly financially enriched by the scams, which had been set-up by Wall Street in order to enrich the investment-insiders (the aristocrats themselves) at the expense of investment-outsiders, and of the public-at-large. Conservatives blamed the Government for the crash (as if the Government didnt represent only the aristocracy, but instead represented the American public). However, liberals blamed Wall Street (the financial agents of Americas aristocracy). And, nobody blamed the aristocracy itself.

Americas entire political system, the liberal and the conservative politicians and press, thus hid, from the public, the role that the principals, the aristocrats themselves, had played, demanding these crimes from and by their agents. In other words: the top people who had caused the 2008 crash, didnt only and all of them did avoid prison entirely, but the worst that some of them suffered, was only that the financial firms that some of them had headed, became hit by wrist-slap fines, and that some of their lower-level employees who had actually executed or carried out the scams are being prosecuted and might someday be fined or even sent to prison. But neither the aristocrats nor their financial agents who run Wall Street were punished, either by the law, nor by their personal reputations. They still are treated in their newsmedia as sages and philanthropists, instead of as the nations most-successful organized gangsters.

U.S. President Barack Obama himself protected the top Wall Street people, but, because he was a liberal i.e., a conservative who is hypocritical enough to damn conservatism in public; or, in other words, a conservative who misrepresents what he is he publicly condemned, in vague terms, the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis , even while he had his Administration prosecuted none of them, and even while he assured Wall Streets top people privately Im protecting you. Obama had told the Wall Street bigs, near the start of his regime, on 27 March 2009, in private, inside the White House: My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks. Im not out there to go after you. Im protecting you. Im going to shield you. And thats what he did. To him, the public were just pitchforks, like the KKK bigots who had chased Blacks with pitchforks and lynched them during the early 20th Century were. The heads of Wall Street firms that were being bailed-out by U.S. taxpayers were persecuted victims of the public, in that U.S. Presidents eyes. To them, the public are merely a mob. And, on 20 September 2016, Dave Johnson of the Campaign for Americas Future, headlined Banks Used Low Wages, Job Insecurity To Force Employees To Commit Fraud ; so, there was no way that the employees could keep their jobs except to do the crimes that they were being virtually forced by their bosses to do. The criminality was actually at the very top even above where Obama had promised Im protecting you, which was directed instead only to the Wall Street bigs, and not to the billionaires they served. And even those people mainly werent billionaires at all; they were mainly just top financial agents for the billionaires, grasping to join the aristocracy. Obama, like they, represented the billionaires, though as a politician; and, so, he talked publicly against some of these agents, basically against Republican ones, in order to keep the votes of Democrats he just kept suckering the liberals, the Democratic Party of the U.S. aristocracys voters.

The aristocracys newsmedia present the storyline that the billionaires and centi-millionaires were merely among the many victims of the scams that had produced the 2008 crash; but there is a problem with that storyline: the Government bailed-out those giant investors, because those were overwhelmingly the investors in Strategically Important Financial Institutions not in medium and small-sized ones, not in merely community banks, but in the giant banks and insurers.

These mega-investors were the controlling interests in Americas international corporations. They consequently controlled U.S. Government politics and political fundraising.

Cheated investors, and illegally foreclosed home-owners, were nominally protected in the laws, but even the federal Governments own studies of actual results showed that almost all of these people, the real direct victims, were simply being ignored even while Wall Street and its mega-investors got bailed-out by taxpayers.

The entire system, both private and public, was thus controlled by the aristocracy; and, so, even now a decade after the crash, the responsible aristocrats remain at the very top, both financially and in terms of prestige, and the statutes-of-limitations on possible prosecutions of decisions they had made which had actually produced the crash, have expired, so that these individuals cant be prosecuted, not even if an honest person were elected to the White House and were to become supported by an honest Congress. Equal Justice Under Law this certainly isnt that, nor anything close to it. In fact, America has the worlds highest percentage of its population in prison of any country, but aristocrats never end up there unless the aristocrat is a drug-kingpin, and even those are rarely prosecuted, even though their underlings are. And, how can such a nation as this, be called a democracy ? But its not only a dictatorship; it is an imperial one: Obama himself said many times, such as on 28 May 2014, The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation, which means that every other nation was dispensable to him; and, any foreign aristocracy and any democracy (if such any longer exists) will therefore be either a vassal-nation, or else the enemy, and thus be destroyed, at the sole discretion of Americas (and its allied) aristocracies.

For example, to George W. Bush, Saddam Hussein was the enemy and Iraq was dispensable (to use Obamas term); and, to Obama, Muammar Gaddafi and Bashar al-Assad, and Viktor Yanukovych, were enemies, and those nations also were dispensable. During earlier eras, Mohammed Mosaddegh, and Jacobo Arbenz, and Salvador Allende, were enemies, whose governments were, in their own times, dispensable, and so the U.S. aristocracy replaced them by U.S.-Government-selected tyrants. (Assad, however, was able to stay in power, not only because he had the support of the majority of Syrians, but because Russia decided to protect Syrias national sovereignty to make its firm stand, there, not allow that ally, too, to fall by means of an American invasion, as Ukraine had fallen by means of an American coup in 2014.) Trump seems to think that Iran and North Korea are especially dispensable (again, using Obamas term). Trump came to power promising opposition against the U.S. aristocracy; but, instead, hes on the attack against Obamas least-bad policies, while trying to out-do Obamas worst policies (such as by his cancelling the Iran deal, and by his trying to destroy Obamacare and the Paris Climate Agreement). If Obama turned out to be a Democratic George W. Bush, then perhaps Trump will turn out to be a Republican Barack Obama, and this will be the bipartisanship that U.S. voters say they want. But the polls dont show that Americas electorate actually want the type of bipartisanship that the U.S. aristocracy are delivering, via the nonstop neoconservatism of Bush, and then of Obama, and then (perhaps too) of Trump. The aristocracy are neoconservative (or imperialistic, to employ the Continental term for it); and, though the public dont even know what that means, bipartisan neoconservatism always brings on yet more invasions and wars, which lower the welfare of the public, even while the welfare of the aristocrats goes up from it. The public just dont know this.

A good example, recently, of how the U.S. aristocracy deceive the U.S. public, to accept such a barbaric Government (a neoconservative regime) is the uniform neoconservatism of both the Democratic and the Republican Parties, and of their respective newsmedia, this uniform neoconservatism thats being reflected by the almost simultaneous publication in the Establishments own Foreign Affairs (from the Council on Foreign Relations), and from the British Guardian thats now controlled by George Soros and U.S. and-affiliated international corporations, and also from the U.S. military-industrial complexs bipartisan neoconservative propaganda-organ The Atlantic, and also from the neoconservative Vox online news-site. In all of these newsmedia, almost on the very same day, are being published articles by, and interviews of, Ms. Emma Sky, a thoroughly undistinguished and undistinguishable neoconservative intellectual (CFR, Yale, Harvard, Oxford, Officer of the British Empire, etc.), who, with no demonstrated outstanding abilities, but only with the hypocrisy and callousness that aristocrats tend to seek out in those whom they select to execute their dirty-work, graduated from an elite college and then (without needing to obtain any higher academic or other degree, and with no record of personal achievement at anything) went virtually straight into advising governments and serving as the U.S. invading and occupying General David Petraeuss (the U.S. torture-meisters) right-hand political advisor in Iraq, with the title of Governorate Co-ordinator of Kirkuk for the Coalition Provisional Authority, 2003-2004 , and, then, ultimately, as advisor to the Commanding General of US Forces in Iraq from 2007-2010, before becoming widely published in the U.S. empires various newsmedia, with not only these hypocritical articles from her that were linked-to at those four publications, but also books, all of them being standard discreet neoconservative fare, compassionately gung-ho on the U.S. empire, and especially rabid against Iran, because Iranians in 1953 had voted for Mohammed Mosaddegh as Prime Minister, who promptly passed a land-reform act, and nationalized the UK aristocracys Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, after which the U.S. CIA engineered a coup overthrowing him, grabbing Irans oil, and establishing in Iran the Pahlavi Shahs brutal dictatorship with torture-chambers, which dictatorship Ms. Sky evidently wants restored in some form to Iran, perhaps as punishment to the Iranian people, for having stood up against the American invaders and occupiers, in 1953. Such people are PR agents, not really journalists or historians of anything. But, apparently, readers find their misrepresentations to be tolerable; so, at least her propaganda isnt amateurish. If only readers would just ask themselves the type of question that the victims of these invasions might likely ask, then the true character of such writers would become horrendously and immediately clear: What right do you have to be invading and occupying our land?

No one can understand the reality on the basis of the Wests honored historians and journalists, because theyre propagandists for the imperial system, which used to be British but now is American. The neoconservative New York Times Sunday Book Review section published, on 12 July 2015, a review from the neoconservative Christopher Dickey, the Foreign Editor of the neoconservative The Daily Beast news-site, of the neoconservative Emma Skys book The Unraveling: High Hopes and Missed Opportunities in Iraq. He presented Iran as being Americas enemy-in-chief, and presented especially Qassim Suleimani, the head of Irans Quds Force, the section of the Revolutionary Guards responsible for covert and overt operations in Lebanon, Syria and, above all, Iraq as being Americas enemy; and he wrote that:

the betrayal of the Sunnis by the Baghdad government the Americans left behind has been crucial to recruiting by the self- proclaimed caliphate. Many of those who had helped crush Al Qaeda in Iraq eight years ago have concluded that no one except Islamic State will protect them from Suleimanis fighters and flunkies.

To counter Iran in Iraq and prevent the alienation that created Islamic State would have required a better ambassador than Hill and a more attentive State Department than the one run by Hillary Clinton. It would have required, perhaps, a thousand Emma Skys. But there was only one of those. And it would have meant many more years of enormous involvement on the ground, but the American people had no taste for that.

Even Hillary Clinton wasnt enough of a neocon to suit him; but Emma Sky was.

Neoconservatives support Israel, and support the Saud family who rule as absolute dictators over they own Saudi Arabia. And, both Israel and the Saud family have labelled Iran as an existential threat to themselves, without ever providing any reasonable evidence to indicate it to be that, neither against the Saud family nor against a non-apartheid Israel (though some Iranian leaders have indeed damned the existing apartheid Israel). The U.S. aristocracy are in bed with both the Saud family and the Israeli Government, to conquer Iran yet again, to control it, like during 1953-1979. The three aristocracies the Sauds, Americas aristocracy, and Israels aristocracy are perpetrating a Long War against not only Iran, which is the leading Shia-majority nation, but also against Shia Muslims in all countries. One cannot understand U.S. foreign relations without, as I titled this matter in a previous article, Understanding the Power-Contest Between Aristocracies . That article opened, At the core of global power stands the conflict between the Sauds and their Sunni clergy, versus the Iranians and their Shiite clergy. One cant understand U.S.-Russian relations, nor much else of what is happening in the world, without knowing the relevant historical background; and the origins and nature of the Sunni war against Shia are arguably the most essential part of that.

This is more important to the U.S. aristocracy than is anything that concerns the welfare of the American public. And, in order to understand why we invaded Iraq in 2003, and Syria subsequently not to mention invaded Libya in 2011, which was run by the Sunni moderate, Muammar Gaddafi, who wanted good relations with both Iran and Russia one must understand the U.S.-Israeli-Saudi obsession to reconquer Iran, and to wage wars against Shia everywhere. The U.S., and Western publics, are in the thrall of these three aristocracies; and writers such as Emma Sky and Christopher Dickey are propagandists for those masters. Only in this light do their writings actually make sense as propaganda. Why do people pay good money to read or hear propaganda?

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of Theyre Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRISTS VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Finance & Economics, ISIS, Israel & Zionism, Middle East, Politics, Public Figures, Syria, War on terror.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , .


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?



css.php