Skip to content


Oh For Godsake, Leave Jill Stein Alone

Oh For Godsake, Leave Jill Stein Alone

By DavidSwanson
washingtonsblog.com

Ive known Jill Stein for years. I knew weeks ago that the Senate Intelligence Committee was coming after her. I set up this petition to put reasonable limits on Russiagate. But Ive not heard from Jill, nor had any secret communication from my good friend Vladimir, nor any such nonsense. I criticize the Russian and U.S. governments as they deserve it. Nearly three years ago, Russia tried to secretly hire me to spread its propaganda, and I said no and blogged about it. Although this happened right on Capitol Hill, no Congressional Committee gave a rats rear about it. It wasnt part of their agenda. When I go on Russian media I say the same thing as on U.S. media, though sometimes with a particular focus on criticizing Russia a nation Ive never been paid a dime by or worked for as a volunteer.

Why is the U.S. Congress going after Jill Stein? Because no law-enforcement agency could do so, since no probable cause exists to believe she has committed any crime. Neither is there probable cause to believe she engaged in the non-criminal action of shaping her policy platform based on anything she learned from anyone Russian. She went to a Russian media event, something Ive always refused to do because of peoples fear of just this sort of witch hunt. But she paid her own way. She didnt take a dime from the Russian government. She didnt even demand that the Russian government help block a UN resolution on illegal Israeli settlements, as President-elect Donald Trumps campaign did in order to undermine the position of the U.S. President something the U.S. Congress seems unconcerned by. Nor did she cut any sort of deal with the Russian government whatsoever. She just attended a public event with a bunch of people who didnt even speak the same language as each other.

Jill Stein ran the same sort of campaign with the same sort of platform that she had run in previous years, and that other Green Party candidates had run in years prior. She didnt oppose bombing various countries or subsidizing fossil fuels or leaving people without health coverage because someone in Russia asked her to. Shed had the same positions for years. She didnt oppose lesser evilism and believe the wisest electoral path to consist of running a better platform and voting your conscience because Putin gave her the idea. Shes thought that way for years.

The reason Jill Stein matters to Russiagate is that it has gone on for a year without finding any solid way to blame Hillary Clintons campaign on Donald Trump. The original goal had been to distract the media from the Democrats rigging of their primary, and to claim that Russia had stolen and leaked documents to WikiLeaks. Those documents should have been public, as they revealed major abuses of the U.S. electoral system. But theres no evidence they decided the election, and even after a year of digging no evidence that Russia leaked them. And at this point, theres not much chance such evidence will ever be found. So, whats needed is a change of subject, a new way in which Russia not Hillary! is to blame for a U.S. electoral system corrupt in dozens of ways from the start and contentedly staying that way.

Lesser-evilists who blame spoilers would be all too happy to add Russian collusion to the rap sheet for Jill Stein, if only to finally justify having taught their kids the word collusion. But the idea is patently absurd, and zero evidence exists. However, Congress can harass anyone it chooses. Probably cause is not required.

The reason Jill Stein should matter, and what we should be telling the millions of people who will now hear of her for the first time, is that she entered the U.S. presidential race with a decent and humane policy platform, by no means perfect, but light years ahead of those of the two least popular duopolistic political parties since the invention of polling. In a system with open debates and ballot access and a ban on bribery, fair funding and air time, automatic registration, verifiable counting, election-day holiday, ranked-choice voting, etc., etc., a candidate with a decent platform could run and win. Jill Stein ran in part, I think, so that people would simply hear about such a platform. Hers was a platform dramatically superior to that even of Senator Bernie Sanders.

If you think free college is popular, you should see what young people think of free college and erasing all existing student debt.

If single-payer healthcare with raised taxes (but net savings, if you make it to that fine print) excites voters, how do you think theyd respond to single-payer healthcare with no raised taxes?

If fewer wars and asking Saudi Arabia to do more of the funding and fighting sounds promising, what would you say to no more wars, a 50 percent cut in the $1 trillion/year military spending, no more weapons sales to Saudi Arabia which is doing more than enough killing, thank you, no more free weapons for Israel either, and investment of some of the savings in a massive green energy jobs campaign producing a sustainable energy policy and a full-employment economy?

Senator Bernie Sanders domestic proposals got millions excited, but the (unfair and misleading) criticism that he would raise taxes may have been a tragic flaw, and its one he opened himself up to by refusing to say that hed cut the military. Stein proposed to cut at least half of the single biggest item in the discretionary budget, an item that takes up at least half of that budget: military spending. Shed have cut fossil fuel subsidies, as well, and expected savings to come from healthcare, including as a result of cutting pollution and improving food quality. But the big immediate item was the military. Cutting it is popular with voters, but not with Democratic or Republican presidential candidates. Sanders was labeled the Tax Man by the corporate media, while Jill Stein would have had to be attacked in a different way if she ever got mentioned.

Cutting the military budget is something that we can do right now, Stein told me back during the campaign, but we want to be clear that we are putting an end to wars for oil period. And that is part of our core policy of a Green New Deal which creates an emergency program, establishing twenty million living wage jobs, full-time jobs, to green the economy, our energy, food, and transportation systems, building critical infrastructure, restoring ecosystems, etc. This is an emergency program that will get to 100 percent renewable energy by 2030. So this is a war-time-level mobilization in order to completely detoxify our energy system, and that means both nuclear and fossil fuel. In doing that, we deprive the empire of this major justification for wars and bases all around the world. So we want to be clear that that emphasis is gone, and goading the American public into war so as to feed our fossil fuel energy system that ends and makes all the more essential and possible the major cutting of the military budget.

Which 50 percent of the military would Stein cut? Two places she named that she would start with (there would have to be much more) are foreign bases (shed close them) and the U.S. nuclear weapons program.

Would she unilaterally scrap U.S. nukes? I asked.

We dont even need to do it unilaterally, Stein said, because the Russians have been begging to revive the process of nuclear disarmament, which the U.S., in its wisdom, undercut. The Russians have been persistently trying to restore those nuclear talks for the purpose of disarmament. And that would be step one is to make major reductions between the U.S. and Russia and then to convene a world forum to put an end to nuclear weapons altogether.

Those Russian positions were public, not secret.

The war on terror, Stein pointed out, has only created more terror, while costing each U.S. household $75,000. Thats not going to make people terribly enthusiastic for it, particularly when you point out that all this has done is create failed states, worse terrorist threat, whether you look at the Taliban, the globalization of al-Qaeda, the creation of Islamic State. This has been an utter, unmitigated disaster, and the massive refugee crisis which is threatening to tear apart the European Union. This is absolutely unsustainable by any count.

To change U.S. foreign policy, Stein proposed financial reforms unheard of in any presidential debate. She suggested that military and other government contractors should face pay to play protections preventing them from buying their way into policy. Stein explained: If you establish that anyone who contributes, who provides campaign contributions, or who lobbies is not eligible for contracting with the government, the minute you break that umbilical cord, then the industry loses its power to corral Congress and dictate foreign policy. Stein said such protections could also block U.S. government facilitation of weapons sales to foreign buyers.

That position is sure to endear Stein to Senatorial Inquisitors.

War profiteering should not be allowed, Stein explained, in the same way that energy profiteering is not compatible with our survival. Ultimately, the big profits, Stein said, are in healthcare: We spend a trillion dollars plus on the military industrial complex every year, but we spend three trillion and counting every year on the sick care system, which doesnt make us well. It just enables us to tread water while we cope with these disastrous health impacts of the war economy and the fossil fuel economy.

Stein did not hesitate to highlight differences when I asked her about Bernie Sanders. She cited his support, for example, for the F-35 weapons system which has been an incredible boondoggle. While Sanders would keep killing with drones and fighting terrorism, Stein called fighting terrorism an oxymoron and pointed to counterproductive results: Terrorism is a response to drones that sneak up on you in the night and to night raids and this is where we recruit and we enable Islamic State and al-Qaeda to continue expanding something Bernie hasnt quite gotten straight by saying the solution here is to turn the Saudis loose; the Saudis need to get their hands dirty.

We can actually begin to rein in the Saudis with a weapons embargo and by impounding their bank accounts, Stein said, outlining a policy that could have saved countless lives now lost in Yemen.

The same goes for Israel, she added, stressing the need to respect the law. Should the United States join the International Criminal Court, I asked. Oh, my god, of course! was Steins reply. And the treaty on land mines? Of course! My god. Yes. There are all sorts of treaties that are ready to move forward. In fact the Soviets and the Chinese have been prime movers in expansion of treaties to prohibit weapons in space and to establish the rule of law in cyberspace.

So, what would President Jill Stein do about Islamic State? She answered that question with no hesitation: Number 1: we dont stop Islamic State by doing more of what created Islamic State. This is like the elephant in the room that none of the other presidential candidates are willing to acknowledge, even Rand Paul, I might say, surprisingly. So we dont bomb Islamic State and try to shoot Islamic State out. Weve got to stop Islamic State in its tracks by ending the funding of Islamic State and by ending the arming of Islamic State. How do we do that? We do that with a weapons embargo. And so the U.S. can unilaterally move forward on that, but we need to sit down and talk with the Russians as well, and Putin tried to do this.

You know, Putin, our arch enemy Putin, was actually trying to create a peace process in Syria. We need to begin talking with Russia and with other countries.

What Stein was proposing here, I should note, stands in stark contrast to Russias actual approach of bombing Syria.

We need to build on our relative’d tente with Iran to engage them, and we need to bring our allies into the process. Right now, the peace process, as I understand it, is held up by, guess who Saudi Arabia, who wants to bring in known terrorist groups as the representatives of the opposition. The Saudis should not be defining the way forward here Our ally Turkey needs to understand that their membership in NATO or their position with the U.S. and other allies around the world should not be taken for granted, and that they cannot be in the business either of funding Islamic State and related groups through the purchase of their oil [or of] shipping weapons. They also need to close down their border to the movement of the militias.

Stein was sounding an awful lot like the leader of the Labour Party in Britain, Jeremy Corbyn, and I asked her about him. I have already met with Jeremy Corbyn, she said, (Egad! Will there be hearings?!) when I was in Paris for the climate talks, and we had a surprising amount of time to talk and we agreed completely on collaborating on this peace offensive, which is the name we have given to our solution to the problem of Islamic State. Peace is not passive. We need an active, interventionist program based on peace which means to stop the flow or arms and money, etc. So, weve already agreed that we see eye-to-eye on foreign policy.

But Corbyn is in office with a shot at becoming prime minister. With the U.S. public completely sold on the hopelessness of third-party bids, at least by non-multi-billionaires, what was Steins plan for actually becoming president?

First of all, she said, there are 43 million young people and not-so-young people who are trapped in debt, in student debt. My campaign is the only campaign that will be on the ballot that will abolish student debt. We did it for the bankers who plunged us into this economic crisis that persists in spite of what they say. And they did that by way of their waste, fraud, and abuse. Yet we bailed them out to the tune of $16 trillion and counting.

So, isnt it about time we bail out the victims of that waste, fraud, and abuse the young people of this country whose leadership and whose civic engagement is essential for blazing the trail to our future? It has always required a fresh generation to re-envision, you know, what our future looks like. So, we need to bail out the young people, for their benefit and for ours. That can be done through another quantitative easing which is relatively simple, does not cost us, essentially expands the money supply in a way that works as a stimulus to the economy, unlike the bailout that they provided to Wall Street which has only created a stimulus for more reckless gambling waste, fraud, and abuse. I have yet to find a young person in debt who doesnt become a missionary for our campaign the minute they learn that we will cancel their debt. The 43 million young people that is a plurality of the vote. In a three-way race, thats enough to win the vote.

Stein also pointed to 25 million Latinos who, she said, have learned that the Democrats are the party of deportation, of night raids, and of detention, of refugees who are fleeing a crisis in their home countries that we created. How? Through NAFTA, though illegal coups and CIA-sponsored regime changes, and through the drug wars. If people want to fix the immigration problem, the answer is, Stop causing it.

But would Stein be in the debates for the general election? In my experience, she told me, all you have to do is have a real conversation, have an open mic, a true presidential debate that actually allows presidential candidates to debate who have broad enough support that they are on the ballot for a majority of Americans and could numerically win the election. We are challenging the Commission on Presidential Debates in court and we will be challenging them soon with a direct action campaign, so stay tuned, because the American public deserves to know about the issues. The American public deserves the right to vote. And they have a right to know who they can vote for and what they are voting about.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Business, Finance & Economics, ISIS, Middle East, Politics, Russia, Syria, War on terror.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , .

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's happening big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale".

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally IU know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know people in court at the moment for the content they had on their secret private group. Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer if you need to or buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA to hack into if you are that paranoid.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering bollox) then I could do with some. Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why/

Why?

Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent
false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material. Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and #altnews alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?


0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



css.php