Skip to content

When America’s Press Contradicts America’s President

When America’s Press Contradicts America’s President

By Eric Zuesse.

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at

On November 16th, the Washington Post headlined that CIA concludes Saudi crown prince ordered Jamal Khashoggis assassination and reported that The CIAs assessment, in which officials have said they have high confidence, is the most definitive to date linking [Crown Prince] Mohammed [bin Salman] to the [murder] operation.

Then, after almost a full week of silence on that, U.S. President Trump, on November 22nd, denied that the CIA had come to any conclusion, at all, about whether Saudi Crown Prince Salman had ordered the murder of Khashoggi: Trump said They did not come to a conclusion. They have feelings certain ways. I have the report They have not concluded. I dont know if anyones going to be able to conclude that the Crown Prince did it. Congressional Democrats promptly responded to the Presidents statement, by repeating what the Washington Post had said, and telling CNN, The CIA concluded that the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia was directly involved in the assassination of Khashoggi. They did it with high confidence, which is the highest level of accuracy that they will vouch for.

Americas voting public believe whomever they want to believe, which is almost always the politicians and newsmedia that the given individual votes for and obtains news from. In such a country, objective reality is hard to find, because the crucial evidence is hidden from the public. For example, the CIAs report on the Khashoggi murder is hidden from the public. Neither the Government nor the press trust the public enough to allow the public to see anything of the actual report itself. So, voters can only go by whatever prejudices they have. Therefore, in America, prejudices reign, and it happens because the Government and the press dont trust the public enough to present the actual evidence to them. Either a person trusts the Government, or the person doesnt. But what is the Government, in such a case as this? Is it the WP-alleged assertion of what the CIA supposedly said, or is it instead the U.S. President, who says that the CIA didnt assert any such thing? And, if you dont trust what one side, in such a case, calls the Government, then its easy for that side to label you unpatriotic, even if you happen to be a patriot asserting the truth, and the Government happens to be the actual traitor against its own public, such as the U.S. Government itself has been proven to be (and not only about such matters as 2003s WMD in Iraq , in which the U.S. Government was clearly traitorous).

When the Washington Post, on November 22nd, reported Trumps comments about the CIAs report, the newspaper didnt even include Trumps denial, which was quoted here, but instead gave only fluff from Trump, such as I hate the crime, I hate the coverup. I will tell you this: The crown prince hates it more than I do, and they have vehemently denied it. That newspaper merely paraphrased Trump, didnt actually quote him, about the important parts of the Presidents statement there. The newspaper opened its news-report with President Trump on Thursday contradicted the CIAs assessment that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had ordered the killing of Washington Post contributing columnist Jamal Khashoggi. But there was only that one-word paraphrase (contradicted ). Thats all there was, in the entire thousand-word news-report, none of his actual statement about the CIAs report on the killing of Khashoggi. Reporters like this should be fired, but they wont be if the purpose of hiring and retaining them is to hide the actual evidence from the public, by providing only paraphrases (in this case, a mere one-word paraphrase) for the crucial parts, instead of presenting the actual evidence itself (by quoting it directly). The WP excluded anything like Trumps statement that They did not come to a conclusion. They have feelings certain ways. I have the report They have not concluded. I dont know if anyones going to be able to conclude that the Crown Prince did it. Instead, their mere paraphrase of that, alleging that Trump contradicted the CIAs assessment didnt present either a quotation from the CIAs report, or a quotation from the President, much less (as would have been required in an authentic news-report on an alleged contradiction, such as this) both, so as to allow subscribers to judge for themselves whether or not the President had contradicted what the CIAs report had actually said. In other words: that was a fake news-report in the Washington Post; it presented no credible news, but only evidence-less fluff, about this important matter.

News-media such as that are part of a political culture thats based not on science a society in which individuals make public-affairs judgments on their own, on the basis of the actual evidence being presented to them but thats based instead purely on faith. Its a religious (or faith-based) political culture, not a scientific one. Thats to say: judgments are based on whatever the individuals prejudice happens to be. Judgments by the public are not based on the evidence, because the evidence is actually being hidden from the public. Obviously, there is no accountability its not even possible to have accountability in such a political culture, because the evidence is being hidden from voters.

On the night of Friday, November 23rd, Trump his Administation released the long-awaited Fourth National Climate Assessment from a panel of 300 climatologists, and it calculated, for example, that Phoenix, Arizona, during 1976-2005, averaged around 80 days per year above 100 degrees Fahrenheit, and that if we do everything possible to minimize fossil-fuels-usage, that average will be around 125 such days annually between 2070 and 2100, but otherwise it will be around 150 days annually, which is almost twice as many sizzling days per year as compared with the period 1976-2005.

On Monday, November 26th, CNN headlined “Donald Trump buried a climate change report because ‘I don’t believe it and reported that, I don’t believe it, Trump told reporters on Monday, adding that he had read some of the report. Its a report which had been produced by 13 agencies within the Trump administration the result of Congress, in the 1980s, mandating that this sort of report be submitted every four years as a sort of reference point for lawmakers and legislators. This news-report from CNN was real, not fake like the Washington Posts was on the Khashoggi matter, and it linked to the evidence, including to the actual study itself, and to Trumps statement that he doesnt believe it.

Here, then, is an actual example of authentic news-reporting, which is credit-worthy and not simply to be taken on mere trust (like the Washington Posts news about Trumps contradicting his own CIAs report). But will Trumps voters still have faith in him, despite his clear divergence from the professionals on climatology, the scientists who are experts in these types of matters? Obviously, such a President (one who rejects the overwhelming consensus of scientific opinion on a scientific topic) is an actual crackpot; but will his voters believe him simply because they want to believe him because theyre people of faith and he here happens to be peddling their particular belief because theyre not people of science? Then how can democracy even function, with such a public? Only authoritarianism (a faith-based regime) can function, in such a country as this.

On November 26th, the most Trumpian news-medium of all, Breitbart, didnt even report Trumps I dont believe it, but did include, on November 26th, a November 25th news-article bannered “Experts on Climate Change Assessment: Every Conclusion of This Latest Government Report Is False , which opened:

The federal governments Fourth National Climate Assessment, released on Friday, has gained praise from leftists and left-wing environmental groups as a dire warning of the coming death and destruction in the United States if we dont stop global warming.

But critics of the report, including scientists, have slammed it as exaggeration, bad science and even said its conclusions are false.

This latest climate report is just more of the same except for even greater exaggeration, worse science, and added interference in the political process by unelected, self-serving bureaucrats, Tim Huelskamp, president of the Heartland Institute said in statements released by the free-market think tank following the reports release.

Nothing was said there about the Heartland Institutes being funded by far-right billionaires including many who own or are heavily invested in oil and gas corporations. These people have a financial stake in downplaying the environmental threat thats posed by their products. Very few climatologists are members of that particular propaganda-operation. Its fake, as an authority about anything. Clearly, Trump represents those fossil-fuels corporate owners, not the public not even the voters who had voted for him. All Americans have a real stake in the truth about the global-warming issue. All people everywhere do.

Is an authentic democracy possible in such a country as this, where its so easy for liars to win and keep public offices? All that the liars have to do is to pump to the public the deceits that the billionaires they serve want them to pump. The politicians who do that will be the ones who are in serious contention to become winners, because their political campaigns will receive all the funding thats needed in order for them to be in serious contention. The politicians who are honest wont be among the ones who are in serious contention itll be like Americas Government actually is.

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of Theyre Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRISTS VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

View the original article at Washingtons Blog

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Posted in Analysis & Review, Climate Change, conspiracy, Mainstream Media, Politics.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , .

0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Support #altnews & keep Dark Politricks alive

Remember I told you over 5 years ago that they would be trying to shut down sites and YouTube channels that are not promoting the "Official" view. Well it's all happening now big time. Peoples Channels get no money from YouTube any more and Google is being fishy with their AdSense giving money for some clicks but not others. The time is here, it's not "Obama's Internet Cut Off Switch" it's "Trumps Sell Everyones Internet Dirty Laundry Garage Sale". This site must be on some list at GCHQ/NSA as my AdSense revenue which I rely on has gone down by a third. Either people are not helping out by visiting sponsors sanymore or I am being blackballed like many YouTube sites.

It's not just Google/YouTube defunding altenative chanels (mine was shut), but Facebook is also removing content, shutting pages, profiles and groups and removing funds from #altnews that way as well. I was recently kicked off FB and had a page "unpublished" with no reason given. If you don't know already all Facebooks Private Messages and Secret Groups are still analysed and checked for words related to drugs, sex, war etc against their own TOS. Personally I know there are undercover Irish police moving from group to group cloning peoples accounts and getting people booted. Worse than that I know some people in prison now for the content they had on their "secret private group". Use Telegrams secret chat mode to chat on, or if you prefer Wickr. If you really need to, buy a dumb phone with nothing for the NSA/GCHQ to hack into. Ensure it has no GPS tracking on it and that the battery can be removed. These are usually built for old people to get used to technology storing only a set of numbers to call. However they have no games, applications to install or other ways people can exploit the computer tracking device you carry round with you most of the day - your smart phone. If you are paranoid ensure that you can remove the battery when travelling around and do so to prevent GPS tracking or phone mast triangulation. Even with your phone in Flight mode or turned off, it can be turned on remotely and any features like front or back cameras, microphones and keylogging software can be installed to trace you.

So if your not supporting this site already which brings you news from the Left to the Right (really the same war mongering rubbish) then I could REALLY do with some..

Even if it's just £5 or tick the monthly subscription box and throw a few pound my way each month, it will be much appreciated. Read on to find out why.


Any support to keep this site would be appreciated. You could set up a monthly subscription for £2 like some people do or you could pay a one off donation as a gift.
I am not asking you to pay me for other people's articles, this is a clearing house as well as place to put my own views out into the world. I am asking for help to write more articles like my recent false flag gas attack to get WWIII started in Syria, and Trump away from Putin. Hopefully a few missiles won't mean a WikiLeaks release of that infamous video Trump apparently made in a Russian bedroom with Prostitutes. Also please note that this article was written just an hour after the papers came out, and I always come back and update them.

If you want to read JUST my own articles then use the top menu I have written hundreds of articles for this site and I host numerous amounts of material that has seen me the victim of hacks, DOS plus I have been kicked off multiple hosting companies, free blogging sites, and I have even had threats to cease and desist from the US armed forces. Therefore I have to pay for my own server which is NOT cheap. The more people who read these article on this site the more it costs me so some support would be much appreciated.

I have backups of removed reports shown, then taken down after pressure, that show collusion between nations and the media. I have the full redacted 28/29 pages from the 9.11 commission on the site which seems to have been forgotten about as we help Saudi Arabia bomb Yemeni kids hiding in the rubble with white phosphorus, an illegal weaapon. One that the Israeli's even used when they bombed the UN compound in Gaza during Operation Cast Lead. We complain about Syrian troops (US Controlled ISIS) using chemical weapons to kill "beautiful babies". I suppose all those babies we kill in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Syria are just not beautiful enough for Trumps beautiful baby ratio. Plus we kill about 100 times as many as ISIS or the Syrian army have managed by a factor of about 1000 to 1.

I also have a backup of the FOX News series that looked into Israeli connections to 9.11. Obviously FOX removed that as soon as AIPAC, ADL and the rest of the Hasbra brigade protested.

I also have a copy of the the original Liberal Democrats Freedom Bill which was quickly and quietly removed from their site once they enacted and replaced with some watered down rubbish instead once they got into power. No change to police tactics, protesting or our unfair extradition treaty with the USA but we did get a stop to being clamped on private land instead of the mny great ideas in the original.

So ANY support to keep this site running would be much appreciated! I don't have much money after leaving my job and it is a choice between shutting the server or selling the domain or paying a lot of money just so I can show this material.

Material like the FSB Bombings that put Putin in power or the Google no 1 spot when you search for protecting yourself from UK Police with "how to give a no comment interview". If you see any adverts that interest you then please visit them as it helps me without you even needing to give me any money. A few clicks per visit is all it takes to help keep the servers running and tag any tweets with alternative news from the mainstream with the #altnews hashtag I created to keep it alive!

However if you don't want to use the very obvious and cost free ways (to you) to help the site and keep me writing for it then please consider making a small donation. Especially if you have a few quid sitting in your PayPal account doing nothing useful. Why not do a monthly subscription for less money instead. Will you really notice £5 a month?