Deep State V Donald Trump

Is There A Leak In The Intelligence Services Or Does The Deep State Just Want Trump Dead?

By Dark Politricks

After the second assassination attempt on Presidential candidate Donald Trump at the weekend by convicted felon, Ryan Routh, we must ask ourselves, is there a leak in the security services supposedly meant to protect Trump, or does the Deep State so entwined with the Democratic party just want to make sure he never reaches polling day and by using patsies and professionals trying to kill him anyway they can?

According to Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), he claimed that a department of Homeland Security whistle-blower had told him there are currently five known assassination teams in the United States out to kill former President Donald Trump. 

Three of these teams are supposedly foreign, and I don't doubt as neo-con, warmonger, Lindsey Graham has already claimed, that Iran is supposedly behind some of these teams. If he is actually assassinated I can see Israel ready to come out with some rock solid intelligence, which many in the US intelligence community considering Israeli intelligence to be worthless unless benefiting Israel itself.

As Israeli news reports itself, U.S. national security officials consider Israel to be a frustrating ally and a genuine counterintelligence threat with it being implicated in US criminal espionage cases. In fact don't take my words for it, let Haaretz the Israeli newspaper spell it out for you.

"The CIA considers Israel its No. 1 counterintelligence threat in the agency's Near East Division, the group that oversees spying across the Middle East, according to current and former officials. Counterintelligence is the art of protecting national secrets from spies. This means the CIA believes that U.S. national secrets are safer from other Middle Eastern governments than from Israel."

It is obvious Benjamin Netanyahu, trying to start a wider war in the region, and Iran is being very patient, having not yet retaliated for either the humiliation of having Ismail Haniyeh, a senior Hamas leader and negotiator, assassinated in Tehran, or the days of terrorism within Lebanon when intercepted pagers, walkie talkies and even solar panels blew up across the country killing and injuring many Hezbollah members, as well as children and near by civilians. 

I am sure that with the recent talk from Trump about how this up coming US election is "Israels most important election ever", and how he would "Make Israel Great again" as well as being "Israels best friend". It seems that if Trump is elected then Israel is going to get a green light to do a lot of evil in the region with open US backing rather than the current situation of the US backing them but pretending they are giving the Israeli's stern telling offs over the phone after every atrocity they are committing.

The insinuation is clear, if Trump is elected then Israel is clear to do a lot of things it feels it can't at the moment due to international pressure. This will include the annexing of the West Bank, the banning of any criticism of Israels foreign or domestic policy including their genocide and Human rights abuses as they try to starve and slowly kill the Gazan population, and having the US back them in any larger conflict against Hezbollah and Iran which Israel is busy stoking up.

One can only assume they are ratcheting up the war with Hezbollah trying to goad Israel into attack so that once Trump is elected they get to draw the US into a wider war with Iran, once again using the deaths of US soldiers to further their own policy of total dominance over the Middle East. I wouldn't even be surprised due to Israels duplicity concerning the US, whether one of these 5 assassination teams in the US, are Israeli cut outs. They know that if Trump is killed and they can blame it on Iran that the US would go full out heavy metal jacket in the region and possibly start World War III.

The first attempt on Trumps life at a rally in Pennsylvania, was a mixture of security set up to fail, with many buildings, including the one that Crooks shot from outside the security perimeter and possibly other snipers which were there to do the job, letting Crooks play the patsy fall guy.

Plus there is all the strangeness around the shooting including

• Allowing a man with a scope walk around suspiciously without stopping him as if he was meant to be noticed.
• The two officers who left their posts at the time Crooks was crawling along the roof of a building full of cops with guns at the time he would have been noticed.
• Slow response to the first shot being fired before a counter sniper shot back despite the crowd walking around the building Crooks was on pointing and shouting, and from body cam footage we know a cop climbed up to the roof, without his gun, to see what was going on and being confronted by Crooks. Why he didn't take his gun with people calling out that Crooks had one I don't know, but by the time he had ran to his car, got his gun and came back the shooting was over.
• A perimeter set up with so many buildings opposite the stage Trump was on just yards away but outside it. There was more car parking space in the security perimeter than buildings it seems.
• Suspicious activity with geo located phone info showing Crooks being visited by someone who also went to the FBI.
• By the time local law enforcement entered Crooks home, it had been scrubbed clean like a medical centre with no trash or cutlery almost as if it was a command centre. 

I admit that I have little knowledge of guns but have watched multiple videos from ex snipers, second amendment activists and sound analysts, and for me I am still not sure whether Crooks fired all the 8 shots into the crowd and the one that hit Trump.

It sounds as if the first 3 shots were fired with a pause between each shot, and then the next 5 come very fast as if not from the semi-automatic gun Crooks was using. 

There is a 9th shot that the FBI and Secret Service denied occurring, maybe that was from a police officer sniper who was shooting at but missed Crooks. Or maybe it was from a professional Sniper there to take Trump out if the job hadn't been done. 

Then there is a very long wait for the admitted kill shot on Crooks. In fact it takes another 10 seconds for the shot to kill Crooks to occur.

Whether the first 8 shots were all fired by Crooks or not, there is definitely a 9th shot before the long pause which is unexplained for counter snipers who must have seen and heard the shooting, noticed the crowd pointing at the roof Crooks was on and so on before shooting a kill shot. 

Why did they wait so long to kill the assassin? 

Were they waiting for another attempt by their own sniper to take another shot at Trump due to the failure of the first 8/9?

There are plenty of videos on Rumble that delve into the sound analysis of each shot, where the cartridges would have fallen, and what Crooks head should have looked like after being shot. You can find these easily. 

However, for a cursory overview watch the first 15.5 minutes of this video for gunshot analysis and the debate over the missing 9th shot that the FBI won't admit to.

After the first assassination attempt Dan Bongino in a Senate testimony said there would be more attempts on Trumps life and was attacked as just being a crazy conspiracy theorist. A two word creation of the CIA to dismiss anyone with alternative views on the JFK assassination and dismissive of their "magic bullet" theory. This slur has been used so much a bit like anti-Semite since Oct 7th 2023 that it has lost all meaning. 

People in power collude, especially when their interests align, and all a conspiracy means is a crime where two or more people are involved, thousands of conspiracy cases are tried in courts across the world yearly.

Now after this second attempt on Trumps life we, like Dan, must start asking whether there is a leak in the Secret Services due to the fact an out of town, Ukraine mad shooter, sat in the woods of a golf course for 12 hours in the hope of killing Trump when he reached that hole.

Apparently only a few people in the Secret Service would have known about the non publicised visit by Trump and his billionaire friend to the golf course, although Piers Morgan believes it's a no brainer that when Trump is in Florida he plays golf there. However, Trump was in California before flying to Florida, so how did anyone know he would be going back to Florida in time to prepare this trap for him?

Although Dan tries to link the attempt to kill the ex President to Iranian threats and other state actors there could be other closer to home people who are desperate to kill the President. This is someone who has not fallen victim to earlier attempts to take him out of the Presidential race such as the numerous lawfare court cases, failed attempts to impeach him, and threats to ruin him by the intelligence services when leaving office if he dared pardon Julian Assange or Edward Snowden. 

He didn't do those last two acts, but despite this the Deep State have come after him with everything they have got.

The NSA would have been able to intercept any Trump communications about plans to fly to Florida to go golfing, and Ryan Routh could have been notified about the golfing game in time for him to get to the course and plot up in the woods.

The CIA have dubious links with both Ryan Routh and Maxwell Yearick, an Antifa member, who also went to Ukraine to fight and many people believe it was Maxwell Yearick who was the sniper at the Pennsylvania rally and not Crooks who looked similar. 

Whether he was or not will be hard to tell now as he has gone missing since that day, and his parents have filed a missing persons report and his phone has been off. 

Routh would have definitely been on the CIA's watch list for travelling to Ukraine and trying to recruit people to fight out there. Before his social media was totally scrubbed which seems an odd thing to do especially on Twitter where you would expect Elon to allow people to read the postings of a suspect in such a case. 

However, most of it was downloaded by #ALTNEWS reporters before it could be scrubbed and from this we could see his online connections to the CIA as his first ever people he followed worked there or were related to it. They even followed back which shows some sort of relationship between Routh and the intelligence services as well as his seemingly delusional obsession with Ukraine and getting people to come over to fight there.

The CIA certainly has a murky past with assassinations and who knows what MKULTRA like experiments they are getting away with in Ukraine outside the USA's jurisdiction. Routh could have become radicalised or brainwashed into a lone gunmen 60's style CIA hitmen for all we know. 

We know that before Rouths social media was scrubbed people took data down from X that showed he followed particular CIA agents, and he was in Ukraine actually recruiting men to fight for the country war rather than the failed AZOV brigade worshipper kicked out for being mental we are being led to believe by the mainstream media. 

Routh had a long criminal history with over 100 offences, many gun related, even one for possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Another similar charge was dropped despite it being related to being pulled over by cops whilst armed with a machine gun and barricading himself inside a building for three hours. 

Routh eventually pleaded guilty to driving without a license and registration, resisting a public officer and carrying a concealed firearm, while the weapon of mass destruction charge was dropped. Routh's lengthy criminal record has only seen him being convicted in a handful of cases. Maybe someone high up was looking after him?

Whoever in the Deep State is behind these attempts on Trumps life I doubt we have heard the end of them and even if he wins the election, Democrats could pressure their DOJ bent judges to incarcerate him for one of the felony charges he faces. It would definitely be hard for Trump to be POTUS from behind bars but apparently not illegal under US law. 

It would definitely be seen as sour grapes by a Democratic party that crows about Jan 6th and election result denials, totally forgetting totally how in 2016 they invented a tale of pee parties in Russian hotels and Russian hacking to account for Hillary Clinton's loss against Trump. Someone she actually urged to run for President thinking he would be easier to beat.

So there are many angles to see these attempts on Trumps life but the obvious links between both suspects (and the doppelganger Maxwell Yearick) and the two intelligence agencies known for both assassinations and creating crimes from under cover officers and unwitting victims as well as the invasion of privacy through dubious methods is something that we need to look at carefully.

One thing is certain. The left leaning MSM in the USA will try and blame Trump for this assassination attempt as many news shows already have, and if it's still in their news cycle and not memory holed within a fortnight I will be shocked, 

You can watch Dan Bonjino break down his theories of leaks within the Secret Service below.

By Dark Politricks

© 2024 By Dark Politricks

The CIA - 70 years of coups, assassinations and false flag operations

Washington Bullets: A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations

By Dark Politricks

This is from a French site so if you are going to view it there, you may want to translate it to your language to make it readable if you don't speak French. Sorry if this is badly translated but it is worth it. The full article link is here to the original source material > www.les-crises.fr

The targets of Washington's bullets were the leaders who attempted to assert their nation's economic sovereignty, writes Jeremy Kuzmarov in this review of a new book by Vijay Prashad.

70 years of CIA coups, assassinations, "false flags".

Review of Vijay Prashad's book, Washington Bullets: A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations, with a preface by Evo Morales (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2020).

Source: Consortium News, Jeremy Kusmarov

Washington bullets targets. Top left: Congolese leader Patrice Lumumba; top right, Cuban leader Fidel Castro; Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic, bottom left, and bottom right, South Vietnamese Prime Minister Ngo Dinh Diem (boingboing.net)

At his induction hearing in February, the most recent CIA Director, William J. Burns, continued the Agency's long tradition of highlighting the threat posed by Russia and China, as well as North Korea, and said Iran should not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons.

Vijay Prashad's new book, Washington Bullets: A History of the CIA, Coups, and Assassinations, details how fabricated foreign threats have historically been used by the Agency to wage a war against the Third World - to expand the dominance of American companies.

In his preface, Evo Morales Ayma, the former president of Bolivia who was deposed in a U.S.-backed coup in 2019, writes that Prashad's book is devoted to "the bullets that assassinated democratic processes, which have assassinated revolutions and which have assassinated hope."

Jacobo Arbenz (Gobierno de Guatemala, Fotos antiguas de Guatemala. Public domain.)

Prashad is a leading political analyst, author of major studies on imperial interventions, corporate capitalism, and political movements in the Third World.

His latest book synthesizes the wealth of his knowledge. It contains personal revelations from former CIA agents, such as the late Charles Cogan, head of the Near East and South Asia division within the CIA's directorate of operations (1979-1984), who told Prashad that in Afghanistan, the CIA had "from the start funded the worst guys, long before the Iranian revolution and long before the Soviet invasion."

Washington Bullets begins in Guatemala with the 1954 coup that overthrew Jacobo Arbenz, whose moderate program of land reform threatened the interests of the United Fruit Company.

The law firm of US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, Sullivan & Cromwell, had represented United Fruit, and Dulles and his brother, Allen, the head of the CIA (1953-1961), were large shareholders.

Former CIA Director Walter Bedell Smith became President of United Fruit following Arbenz's impeachment, and President Dwight Eisenhower's personal secretary Ann Whitman was the wife of United Fruit's advertising director, Edmund Whitman.

After the coup, Arbenz's successor Castillo Armas said that “if it is necessary to turn the country into a cemetery in order to pacify it, I will not hesitate to do so."

The CIA contributed to this bloodbath by providing Armas with lists of Communists and by giving him his assassination protocol.

This protocol was then applied in operations directed against third world nationalists such as Patrice Lumumba in Congo (1961), Mehdi Ben Barka in Morocco (1965), Che Guevara (1967) and Thomas Sankara in Burkina Faso (1987) .

Sankara was killed as part of a conspiracy carried out in close coordination between a CIA agent at the United States Embassy in Burkina Faso and the French secret service, the SDECE.

According to Prashad, while “many of the assassins' bullets were fired by people with their own steeples, paltry rivalries, and insignificant gains, more often than not they were signed Washington bullets."

Their main objective, he said, was "to stop the tidal wave that had been sweeping since the October Revolution of 1917 and the many waves that have swept the world to form the anti-colonial movement."

Prashad, as these comments indicate, roots the crimes of the CIA in the larger history of colonialism and the hostility of the world's capitalist elites to the emancipation of the working class brought about by the Russian Revolution.

Imperialism, he reminds us, is the attempt to "subdue people to maximize the theft of resources, labour and wealth."

The targets of Washington's bullets, in turn, have been those who, like Sankara and many others, have tried to assert their nation's economic sovereignty.

The CIA's pattern of behaviour was established in the aftermath of World War II, when it supported political factions in Europe that had collaborated with the Nazis against the Communists, who in turn led the resistance against Nazism.

The agency's work, as Prashad writes, has helped "bring back to life the corpse of the reactionary European political bloc." 

In Japan, this meant the creation of a new party (the Liberal Democratic Party - LDP) to defeat the socialists, a party that absorbed old fascists (Ichiro Hatoyama and Nobusuke Kishi) and developed lasting ties with big business and organized crime (Yoshio Kodama).

In 1953, the CIA succeeded in overthrowing the democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran, Mohammed Mossadegh, who had set out to nationalize the country's oil industry.

From 1960 to 1965, the agency attempted to assassinate Cuban revolutionary leader Fidel Castro on at least eight occasions by sending out mafia gangsters who attempted to use poison pills, poisoned pens, a poisoned cigar, a spacesuit containing tuberculosis, botulinum toxin and other deadly bacterial powders. In total, there were 638 assassination attempts - all of them were unsuccessful.

The CIA also orchestrated a coup d'état in South Vietnam in 1963 against the Diem brothers when they sought to draw closer to the National Liberation Front (FLN), a leftist party.

April 1959: Security Bureau (SY) Special Agent Leo Crampsey, left, escorts new Cuban Prime Minister Fidel Castro (center) on a visit to Washington, DC, shortly after the January Revolution in Cuba (US Department of State).

Another coup was carried out against the Indonesian socialist government of Achmed Sukarno, whose ouster in 1965 sparked an anti-Communist bloodbath.

The Indonesian coup of 1965 - like its predecessors in Guatemala and Iran and the one that followed it in Chile - followed a modus operandi with nine different stages:

• put pressure on public opinion
• appoint the suitable man in the field
•  make sure the generals are ready
• make the economy scream [reference to the order given by Nixon to the CIA concerning Chile “Make the economy scream” meaning “do everything in our power to condemn Chile and the Chileans to the greatest destitution
• and poverty. ", Editor's note]
• diplomatically isolate
• organize mass demonstrations
• give green light
• murder
• deny everything
• Destroy economic sovereignty

Perfected and refined over the years, almost all of these steps were most recently implemented in Maidan's 2014 coup in Ukraine, and the right-wing coup against Evo Morales in Bolivia in 2019.

The memorandum which describes the organization by the CIA of the deposition of President Jacobo Árbenz in June 1954 by the paramilitaries. (US Central Intelligence Agency Public domain).

Regarding the economy, Prashad unearthed a CIA study from the early 1950s on how to jeopardize the coffee industry in Guatemala in order to undermine the Arbenz government.

It was a precursor to the Nixon administration's better-known campaign to "make Chile's economy roar" after Chileans had the audacity to elect a socialist, Salvador Allende, who nationalized the copper industry (this industry was controlled by two American companies, Kennecott and Anaconda, which lobbied for a coup).

The chief of the CIA station at the time of the 1973 coup in Chile, which brought fascist General Augusto Pinochet to power, was Henry Hecksher.

He had worked undercover as a coffee buyer in Guatemala at the time of the Arbenz coup and had bribed Colonel Hernán Monzon Aguirre who became the head of the junta that replaced Arbenz.

After being promoted, Hecksher went on to lead CIA subversion operations in Laos and Indonesia in the late 1950s and early 1960s, before leading a project against the Cuban revolution in Mexico.

Hecksher was the counterpart of sinister figures such as Lincoln Gordon - a ruthless anti-Communist who helped orchestrate the 1964 coup in Brazil - Marshall Green, who helped spark the 1965 coup in Indonesia, as well as as CIA agent Kermit Roosevelt and State Department agent Loy Henderson, who helped bring the coup against Mossadegh to fruition.

The United States Embassy played such a direct role in the coups d'état in so many countries that a popular Cold War joke was heard: "Why is there never a coup d'etat in the United States? Because there is no American embassy there."

One of the tricks of the trade was to recruit union activists capable of flushing out the Communists to get rid of them and of organizing strikes against leftist governments in order to facilitate their downfall.

“Anything was acceptable,” writes Prashad, “to undermine the class struggle, both in Europe and in the states that were breaking free from colonial rule. "

Prashad's attention to class divisions offers a refreshing antidote to liberal CIA stories - like Tim Weiner's book, Legacy of Ashes - which present good information but fail to analyse what motivated the activity. misguided agency.

Read the full article (In French) at > www.les-crises.fr

By Dark Politricks

© 2021 Dark Politricks