Showing posts with label Royal Family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Royal Family. Show all posts

Friday, 24 October 2025

The King, Lord Mountbatten, Saville and MI5 Protection

 

Nonce's At The Top Of UK Establishment


By Dark Politricks


Note: In this article I will be using a term some non UK based people might not know about.


Nonce, it means a Pedophile, but is a actually a prison term that means "not on normal courtyard exercise", and originated in Wakefield Prison, Yorkshire.


This is where one of our biggest serial rapists who killed 4 men, is held in his own glass box prison, within a prison, like Hannibal Lector, Robert Maudsley.


I am also going to have to use the word all allegedly a lot in this article, for obvious reasons as you will soon see.


However anything I don't link to is due to it being common knowledge here in the UK. Well at least to my readers I hope!


So let's look at recent events in the UK and then work back through history a bit.


I'm in hospital (again), and so this is short and sweet but at least will it give us something new to talk about!


........…..........


Royals, Politicians, BBC Radio DJ's and Intelligence Protected Nonces i.e Jimmy Savile


Prince Andrew recently gave up his Royal titles due to his Epstein links and paying £12m "quiet money", to Virginia Giuffre, the famous Epstein abused and trafficked girl, that used to work for Trump at his Mar-a-Lafo estate in Florida.


Despite still claiming his innocence, it apparently wasn't a good look for our German Royal inbred clan that rules the UK, and was decided after a meeting with the King and Prince William, that Andrew should give up his Royal titles, and all the trappings.


I don't know anyone who is innocent, who pays that amount of money to get out of trouble! If you were 100% Not Guilty, of allegedly sleeping with an underage girl, would you pay your supposed victim, a huge sum of money, just to get out of being interviewed by the FBI. Also knowing full well as Royal, that you wouldn't spend a minute in a jail cell?


As for Donald Trump he has been tied up with Epstein for years as I reported in a previous article. He used to party with Epstein, and they both lived a stones throw away from each other in Florida. 


Apparently, Trump and Epstein didn't really fall out over a business deal, but rather due to Gislaine Maxwell, stealing workers from him, Including Virginia, to come and work down the road at Epstein's alleged estate / massage parlour / sex slave brothel.


According to Michael Wolf, Trumps biographer, and Epstein himself, Epstein introduced Melania to Donald, and apparently slept with Melania a year before Donald Trump.


Hunter Biden made this claim, using Wolff as his source in a podcast, and Melania threatened to sue unless he retracted his claim. Hunter refused to do so, and no law suit came about.


This episode of the Kyle Kulinski show talks about the entangled relationship between the First Lady and the sex trafficker.



However I discussed the Trump admin policy of Gaslighting the public over Epstein in a previous article. This is about the UK's own power links with nonce's and how intelligence agencies protected them. 


So let's look a bit more closely at our UK Establishment and their connections, and well documented links to sexual abuse scandals, including to Epstein and Jimmy Savile.


By the way the anniversary on Savile's, death is on the 27th of October 2021, if anyone wants to celebrate, that is!


I won't go into David Icke's theories of Royal shapeshifter Reptilians. That's up to you to go to and research.


Go away, read his numerous books, and think for yourself about his research, and claims of SRA (Satanic Ritual Abuse) that maybe link the whole lot of people I discuss here together.


If you want to go down that rabbit hole of Royal Satanic Ritual Abuse, then you can easily find him on X, and watch YouTube interviews with him.


So let's start with our new owner, I mean King, who has absolutely no power over us plebs in the UK at all, allegedly 🇬🇧👀.


The King's favourite friend as a young spring chicken Prince Charlie, was none other than his favourite Royal uncle, 2and a fellow Navy man, Lord Mountbatten.


Maybe that's why Charles followed in his footsteps. I mean what's not to love. Being stuck on a ship full of men, in tiny rooms, where sharing a bed one on top of the other would save so much room?


This favourite friend of the future King, was none other than a later on proven nonce, Lord Mountbatten.


He was killed by the IRA whilst Lobster fishing with friends, with a 50lb bomb planted on his boat the night before. It was probably one of the few good things the IRA did for humanity during "The Troubles", as we called this civil war.


He was also yet another person whom "our" MI5 internal security forces, protected from any scrutiny whilst alive, especially from being exposed as a pedophile. It was actually a FOI request to the FBI dossier on Mountbatten, released in 2019, that revealed the shocking information about the Lord who was a mentor to his grand-nephew Prince Charles.

It contained the damming line, that both he and his wife were:

"persons of extremely low morals" and contain information suggesting that Lord Mountbatten was a pedophile with "a perversion for young boys."  

What did the young Prince and his pedo Uncle get up to together on their visits together. I can only guess. The Prince considered his Uncle to be a great relative, and close friend to hang out with. He was very emotionally affected when the IRA blew him into a million pieces back in 1979.


I wonder, I wonder, did Charles get "broken in" so to speak by his Uncle, and why did he not say anything about this relative, when it was finally proven he was actually a dirty nonce?


Here is a summary of the scandal that involved a Northern Irish kids home and how the UK intelligence forces attempted to cover it up, all to protect the Royal pedophile.


"For decades the story of the evil that occurred at the Kincora Boys' Home and the shocking attempts by MI5 to cover it up have haunted Northern Ireland."

"Journalist Chris Moore proves that not only were the boys in Kincora systematically abused, but some were forced into a paedophile trafficking ring, whose members included Lord Mountbatten."


You can read the full article here. 


Then there are the Kings links with the well known, pedophile Jimmy Saville. Who he went to visit at his home for "a meal and a chat" on occasions.


A report released in 2013 detailed 214 crimes recorded against Jimmy Savile across 28 police force areas spanning several decades.


More than 90 people who are among 450 alleged victims, that we know of abuse are pursuing legal action against the broadcaster's estate and his former employers in the wake of the revelations.


There is no way in the world, that I can think of, that the future King of the UK, wouldn't have known that the person he was having a "meal and a chat" with, wasn't a prolific child abuser.


The intelligence agencies and Special Branch would have definitely known this, and it is what all  the rest of us clued up people suspected.


The whole of the BBC, which seems to roll out nonce's with cookie cutters, knew he was a nonce, but didn't say anything until after his death.


Did he hold that much power over everyone that knew the truth about him at the BBC, or did he just know that some of the people on the BBC Board of Directors, were also into the same type of "Charity Work For Kids" that he enjoyed?


The nearest they got to exposing him was an interview with Andrew Neil, where he deflected any serious question into his life with a joke and a laugh.


The other time was a documentary by Louis Theroux, who followed him around for a period, trying to niggle the truth out of him bit by bit.


He asked questions about why he did so much "charity work with kids", and needled him with questions about his mother, whom he seemed to worship like a Goddess.


During this time Jimmy had planned a short cruise with his friend, on a ship full of kid, of course. When his mate turned up at the door, all caught on film, he looked exactly like people would assume a story villain nonce do would do.


A weird single aged man in his late 50's, wearing a long Peeping Tom trench coat, a bowler hat, and a face that just screamed out "run for your lives kids".


I mean no disrespect to this undoubtedly upstanding man of decency, which totally screamed Charity work though, but if I was a kid alone on the swings and he offered me some sweets in a park, I'd have kicked him in the shins and done one.


From my own eyes watching these 2 odd looking blokes, the hat wearing trench coat friend, and the weird looking, white frazzled haired, bright coloured tracksuit wearing, never married, ex DJ and TV presenter. It just gave me chills down my spine.


It also gave me a horrible taste in my mouth, and a sense from watching, that if Louis hadn't gone along with the couple on their "Charity Cruise", something bad (allegedly) would have happened to some poor child on that trip.

 

No disrespect, but they both seemed like 100% proper certified nonce's from first impressions. My opinion of course. That's all I'm saying. I'm sure they meant no harm to anyone on that children's cruise they attended. 


I'm sure the man is a pastor, or son of one, like ex BBC Radio 1, Ali G impersonator, Tim Westwood, whose just been charged with 13 rapes and sex assaults over the last 33 years.




What is it with the BBC, is not bad enough they produce kiddy fiddlers en mass, who have tarnished my childhood heroes like Rolf Harris and Philip Scofield? 


But, now Westwood joins probably joins a longer line of DJs that we know about, such as Savile's "Shadow", Ray Teret, and Chris Denning (to name a few) who liked young kids.


Oh and "News" presenters like Huw Edwards  whose just been convicted of receiving 41 indecent images of children handed out a 6 month prison sentence, suspended for 2 years, and has been put on the sex offenders' register for 7 years using WattsApp to swap images with another person.


I'm sure Huw just wanted to read pretend news to his victims, and Westwood just wanted to sing hymns to rap instrumental music, to the 17 yr old, who is one of his victims.


So I'm sure it was just a pleasure cruise for Jimmy Savile and his friend. 2 old men sitting at the dinner table and picking out their favourite looking kids they'd like to "help out with a little charity" so to speak.


We knew it, well clued up people did, and the BBC, and Establishment, including the Royals and ex PM, the Milk Snatcher, Maggie Thatcher, surely must have known about it.


The Security Services would have definitely known about it. They would have told both Maggie, and Prince Charles, their concerns, and the possibility of exposure and bad press if Jimmy Savile as exposed whilst they were hanging out with him.


Yet for some reason these elites still hung out with Jimmy Savile, laughing at his "jokes", and claiming what a brilliant man he was for all the charity work he did for kids.


I wonder whether all the marathons the cigar smoking pedo ran, was some sort of penance he put himself through to make up for all the evil he knew he had inflicted?



However, the question becomes why did PM Thatcher, have him visit Chequers, have personal private meetings with him, and apparently have the nonce over at her New Years Eve celebrations so many times?



This is someone our current PM and "our dear leader", Sir Kier Starmer, protected from prosecution whilst he was head of the CPS. Squashing any case into his sex crimes whilst still alive.


Apparently Savile attended Maggie Thatchers New Year's Eve parties at Chequers, 11 times in a row, her daughter disputes this. 

She even lobbied for him to receive a knighthood during her Premiership, which were rebuffed numerous times over this "Strange and complex man" and his "sexual promiscuity", yet despite these warnings he was given a knighthood only weeks later, when she stepped down as PM in 1990. However reports of their meetings were heavily redacted for some unknown reason.


What interest did:

Either the current King and Milk Snatcher Thatcher have with Jimmy, if they did know about his proclivities and fondness of kids and corpses?


I can only think of a few reasons.

1. They didn't care about it as they themselves like many in power, as the Epstein case has revealed, enjoy the same sexual attraction to kids.

2. They liked the bloke and ignored the claims everyone made about him.

However from what I've seen of him as an adult, he seems like an obviously unlikeable man from just looking at him, as the Louis Theroux documentary showed.

3. They wanted information from him about which other famous people and politicians were also nonce's, and so that they could be controlled by Thatcher and the Royals.

4. MI5, Special Branch and the Police never bothered to warn them of the dangers to their public image if it came out, that he was the worst nonce in known British history. A true 100% qualified stain on humanity. 


I can't believe this last one would be true.


Our Prime Minister during the 1990s, Margaret Thatcher,  seemed very friendly with Jimmy Savile.



Was he really an intel asset protected at the highest level of the UK establishment, just so he could pass on info to the PM and others, who "nonce's up and down the chain" were.


Was his info used to compromise and control politicians, as the German BND apparently did to alleged ex Tory nonce, PM Ted Heath, the UK leader when the UK was about to join the ECU.

 

Was this is the reason that the "fishing wars" started, when Spanish fisherman were allowed up into the North Seas to steal all our Cod?


Was this all due to the BND telling Heath they knew about his fondness, of taking little boys out on his boat, buggering them, then killing them, and then throwing them into the deep dark water.


There have allegedly been sexual assault claims made against ex Chancellor Kenneth Clarke before, although he has never been arrested for any offence.


However the Liberal MP Cyril Smith was a well known pedophile. The story of how Special Branch rescued him after he had been arrested with a rent boy in a house is famous.



Apparently they showed up sharpish, and told the local Police force to de-arrest him, and destroy all evidence of his crime.


The UK's Prime Minister, Sir Kier Starmer stopped the investigation into Jimmy Saville whilst he was head of the CPS, and he himself has his own Epstein links.


His recent Grindr sex scandal  has just seen some of the male prostitutes on Gay Sex Site, that vandalised his 2nd secret sex pad in London appear in court recently. Their accounts on Grinder have obviously been deleted now, and the usual response about Russian Gladio European terrorism were used to shut the story down ASAP. 


I wonder if the trials will be public and reported on, or will Starmer invoke more D Notices, to stop any reporting on them?


Will the truth be allowed to come out into the light about why 3 male prostitutes got so pissed off with Starmer, they vandalised his "secret home"?


What was he using it for, and how did these male prostitutes even know where it was to vandalise it, and what reason will they give in court I wonder. Will any of them end up "Epsteined", before the trial.


Or will they be threatened into silence, and forced to make Guilty pleas. All to prevent the truth coming out in any trial. This would mean Starmer himself would not need to give evidence. We will have to wait and see.


However, the recent flurry of news about Epstein linked UK politicians including ex PM Tony Blair and now ex US ambassador, Peter Mandelson, have rocked the establishment.


Peter Mandelson considered Epstein such a close friend, he stuck by him after his first arrest and semi imprisonment in Florida, and was apparently friends with him to the end of his life.


The UK ambassador to the US, Peter Mandelson, even called  Epstein "my best pal", writing to him, when he was incarcerated in his New York prison.


This video by James Corbett was just released so I thought I would add it to the article. 


He covers a lot of what I have talked about here, but he also mentions a couple more nonce's the Royals, especially King Charles were linked to including a Priest he defended. 



It seems that wherever you look there are nonce's under the establishments carpet.


I just hope Hell really exists, and that all these powerful nonce's end up being bummed by Satan for eternity.


Can we all agree, or does anyone have any defence for these UK intelligence protected pedos?


By Dark Politricks


© 2025 - Dark Politricks 
 


Friday, 24 August 2012

Should the Sun have printed photos of naked Prince Harry?



Should the Sun have printed photos of naked Prince Harry?

By Dark Politricks

Today the Sun has printed the naked photos of Prince Harry in Las Vegas which were apparently taken by random people who Harry and his friends had met in Las Vegas and invited up to their apartment for "fun and frolics".

After much ringing about once the photos were put up on the internet by one of the "randoms" hoping to make some money from their camera phone shot, the UK paper industry decided to not print the photos.
This was probably due to the ongoing Leveson  inquiry into Press Standards and the fact that journalists have risen into the top 3 most hated professions along with Bankers and Politicians.

It had to be Rupert Murdoch and his Sun newspaper, who's cousin the News of the World was shut down earlier this year, who broke the understanding between Fleet St papers.

He is obviously flexing his muscles and probably out for a bit of revenge after he and his son, his friends and the paper he loved so much which was attacked and vilified for it's disgraceful behaviour during the phone hacking scandal. The scandal that made it perfectly clear that the company was full of Editors who were apparently all a bunch of liars and criminals.

Their crimes went from phone hacking dead girls mobile phone voice-mails to paying police for information and possibly perjury (if lying in front of select committees constitutes a crime ).
Legal cases are ongoing and many ex News of the World staff have been charged with crimes and await their fate.

Therefore it is no surprise to see the rag I wouldn't even wipe my bum with print these photos to sell more toilet paper to the public.

Yes the photos are on the web and if people want to look at them (if that's their turn on) then they are easily accessible with a Google search. However the Sun believes it is in the "public interest" to see people partying in private.

Their excuse is that it is the fact the pictures are of a member of the Royal family that makes it in the public interest.

Apparently Royals can expect no privacy wherever they are from the toe sucking episode with Princess Fergie in the 80's to the chasing and killing of Prince Harry's mum in France and now to the printing of photos of a supposedly "private" party.

For one thing our Royal Family has been filled with loons, nutters, sex and drug addicts for hundreds of years. It is only with modern technology, camera phones, long lens cameras and spy cameras that these antics have been brought to more public attention.

It's not like Harry's uncle Prince Andrew is not unknown for his liking of ladies and a bit of "philandering" or older Kings didn't have mistresses or weird antics. There is even a theory that Jack the Ripper was one of the mentally ill Victorian princes of the time.

I have no love for the Royal Family which you can read about here and here however Prince Harry is probably the most likeable of all the Royals.

He fights for our country, he obviously has issues with his father due to the rumour that his real dad is James Hewitt.

Apparently Prince Charles treats Prince William totally different than Harry but then without an independent DNA test we will never know - but this doesn't stop the rumours.

Harry maybe a bit of lad who likes to party and have fun when he is not on the battlefield. And he would have spent more time out in Afghanistan fighting for his country if it wasn't for papers like the Sun "breaking" the story that he was out there fighting  which totally ruined his chances of staying for fear of kidnap by the Taliban.

I have no issue with what Prince Harry got up to in Las Vegas - "what goes on in Vegas stays in Vegas" - is the saying but the Sun obviously doesn't see it that way. What I take issue with is the whole Royal Family in general.

Yes they bring American tourists in to spend their dollars touring palaces but the whole concept of a family that is "above" the general public due to luck of birth alone is one that should be abolished.
The Crown is the law - the Queen is the Crown.

The Queen or King - maybe even Price Harry if something happened to King William once his dad is dead would never face a trial in court for anything - ever!

They are above us mere mortals and only through stealing and killing our ancestors hundreds of years ago.

If Prince Harry (if he became King - or maybe even now) actually did something criminal - say beat someone up at one of these drunken parties he would never see a day in court like we would if we had done the same.

Crown versus Crown - not int this meritocratic England we all love so much.
We do not need a monarchy. 

We are supposedly rebalancing our economy - lets start by getting rid of the Royal tourism industry by becoming a country without a Royal Family living above the law and living off our taxes and land.

We do not need a President - we have a Parliament made up of Members of the Public and a Prime Minister who can (and already does) represent us on the world stage at meetings and important events.

Adding another election for ex Prime Minisiters and people we hate but have no alternative for is just complicating things. Get rid of the royals, sell off all their land and use it for building low cost houses for all the millions of people on council waiting lists to rent or buy.

The Palaces can stay so that Americans can take their photos and pay us money for the privellege - they never get to see the Queen anyway - so nothing will change there.

We have no need for a Royal family in this day and age and whilst Prince Harry maybe the most normal of the whole lot in my eyes he shouldn't be partying on my taxes!

So tell me what you think about the Royal family and whether or not the Sun should have printed photos of naked Prince Harry?