Israel is a terrorist state. Do the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?

Israel is a terrorist state but do the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?

By Dark Politricks

I am re-posting this article from a couple of years ago as the circumstances of Israel attacking Gaza and Hamas launching attacks on Israel is again repeating itself yet again. It is a cycle that has continued since Hamas was born, or rather created by Israeli intelligence to split the Palestinians into two warring factions, as Fatah / PLO were the dominant political force before Hamas, and although Hamas control Gaza after an election years ago, Fatah continue to reign in the West Bank, although a corrupt and weak state if it could even be called one.

I am against all terrorism, and I think Hamas's attack on 7th October 2023 went too far killing innocent people when they should have just concentrated on their enemy, the IDF. How they were able to cross into Israel so easily with so many men and weapons and carry out their massacre is a question the war mongering evil Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, needs to pay a price for allowing Israel to be caught asleep, and allow Hamas to attack so easily.

However when Israel talks about terrorism, and terrorist attacks they forget how the country was formed. Israel was created through terrorism, with Israeli terrorist groups killing first British soldiers and then massacring Palestinians and forcing them to flee from their homes.

The "plan" this time, in response to Hamas's attack, was for Israel to ethnically cleanse Gaza, forcing all 2 million Palestinians into refugee camps in Egypt. Egypt knows this and this is why they are preventing any Palestinians escaping through their Rafa route into Gaza. Israel doesn't want a two state solution, the growth of illegal settlers proves this as they are making it impossible for a viable Palestinian state to be born. 

The only true solution is a secular Israel with Palestinians and Jews living side by side. However the fervently racist Jews who honestly believe in their magic book, and that they lived in Israel thousands of years ago being God's chosen people, need re-education and some lessons on logic if this is to work. Either these racists need to be removed somewhere away from the Arabs they currently harass on a daily basis, chanting racist songs, mocking the deaths of Mohammed and Jesus, spitting at passers by and even throwing rubbish and bottles of urine onto their market stalls from stolen Palestinian homes above, or some two state system needs to be concocted to prevent these racists attacking Palestinians. 

These Jewish supremacists need to be removed to the north of Israel if one state will work, as its these super racist Jews who hate Christians and Muslims that are filling the current Knesset Government and always call for extermination of Palestinians, want the whole land to themselves and have no thought about launching a war that kills thousands of children.

Anyway here is the article - Israel was born out of terrorism, to claim they are now being threatened by it is hypocritical, Israel IS a terrorist state.

.........

As Israel carries on it's "defence" of it's people by blowing up news organisation buildings and stealing any photos that could contain incriminating images, as well as force people out of their family homes to give over to Israeli's with no chance to take all their belongings I have to ask - why does no-one ever ask the US President who always says "Israel has a right to defend itself" whether the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?

Surely a people under illegal occupation, in which they have been deserted by all their old Arab friends now in bed with Israel and the US, have a right to defend themselves from being annihilated whenever there is an election due or Bibi Netanyahu is about to appear in court?

This is the sentiment of the illegal settlers now taking more Palestians homes, and creating "facts on the ground" to prevent a viable 2 state solution. They see Palestinians as snakes as one Knesset member, Ayelet Shaked once called them.

What these racists don't realise is that the tide is turning against their evil barbaric torture of a whole people. More people in New York, once a staunch pro-Israei ally, is now seeing New Yorkers protest in favour of the Palestinians despite the biased news they recieve from CNN, FOX and MSNBC. Even politicians who are usually all sucking on the teat of AIPAC money have stood up in Congress and in public to defend the Palestinians, something unheard of during the wars against GAZA in the eary 21st century.

They have created so many "facts on the ground" that a two state solution is almost now impossible. So because the rest of the world with a conscience won't let Israel destroy a whole people despite the US giving them a blank cheque to basically do so, therefore there will be only one solution left in the end. A one state, non Jewish, non Islamic, secular state from the sea to the river that both people's will have to learn to live in.

Rashida Tlaib, a Palestinian-American representative of Michigan, also delivered a tearful address to Congress. Speaking of the atrocities that Palestinians face, she questioned the US government’s “unconditional support” of Israel. Recalling how police shot rubber bullets and gas at protestors in Ferguson, Bush said she learned then that “the same equipment that they [the police] used to brutalize us is the same equipment we send to the Israeli military to police and brutalize Palestinians”.

Bernie Sanders called on the Biden administration and fellow lawmakers to “no longer be apologists for the right-wing Netanyahu government and its undemocratic and racist behavior”.

If the United States is going to be a credible voice on human rights on the global stage, we must uphold international standards of human rights consistently, even when it’s politically difficult. We must recognize that Palestinian rights matter. Palestinian lives matter. This comes after an expected weak position taken by Biden in which he said that "Israel has a right to defend itself" - what about Palestinians? 

Do they not also have a right, even a duty seeing they are imprisoned by a country igorning international law, to fight back against their plight?

Remember Israel was born out of terrorism, Israeli terrorism, massacres of Palestinians, and before that, the British Soliders that controlled the Palestinian Mandate.

The smouldering ashes of the King David Hotel blown up by Israeli terrorists in the 40's

So when the Israeli's were "building" their nation by using terrorism to "create facts on the ground" in the late 40's by massacring the Palestinians and forcing them from their homes, the world still stood back and did nothing. There were a few measly wars defeated by the US armed Israeli military from ex Palestinan allies such as Eygpt, Syria and Jordan who have now fallen by the wayside.

This of course caused more massacres, heads chopped off and of course the famous bombing of the King David Hotel, pictured above, which was the British HQ in Palestine at the time. Multiple Presidents and Prime Ministers can find their roots in the terror gangs that pushed the British out of Palestine and let them go on a murderous rampage.

There used to be a video on here by Blackstone Intelligence covering this matter but obviously it has now been taken down. However if been reading my site you will know I have had many historical documents on here related to the, breaches of International law such as the illegal piracy of the Mavi Marmara in international waters where a US citizen was shot 9 times in the back, caught on camera, but hardly mentioned in the US news as it would "embaress an ally".

The same sort of logic that President Johnson used when Israel tried a false flag attack on the USS Liberty, flying US flags, and overhearing their massacres of Eygptians, Johnson almost nuked Eygpt because he believed the lie that it was that country that had attacked the ship. Survivors and Israeli pilots overheard on radio telling their commanders that the ship was American told a different story altogether. Twice planes sent by nearby US ships were ordered back by Defence Secretery McNamara that could have helped the struggling ship.

I have a very famous talk by the ex Zionist turned Christian, and therefore anti-semite or self hating Jew,  Benjamin Freedman, who gave a very famous speech that put a very different spin on the reasons for WW1 and WWII. You can read the transcript and listen to it here.

We should also all know by now that the Rothschilds control most things related to money, pulling their puppets in parliaments and state houses all over the world. They also run most of the central banks in the world where they can print money on worthless paper, lend it to the government, and our taxes go to paying back these usury loans.

However there modus operandi has always been to make money from war. They lend loans to both sides and then collect reparations from the loser and the payback from the winner.

Israel and Zionism is a Rothschild operation, created between the British who were fighting the Ottoman Empire in WWI and Germany who was winning the World War 1. Germany offered to call the war off with no reparations, lets just all go home and forget about it, and they were the side winning. It was a no lose situation for the soldiers, but not for the bankers.

The Rothschild's didn't like this as it meant no money from reparations and they went to the British Government and promised them that they could get the USA into the war and win it. However in return they wanted some form of document that gave them Israel.

The famous Balfour agreement was a document sent to Lord Rothschild that promised to create a land for Zionist Jews if they brought the Americans into the war and in 3 months after the German offer to call the war off there was a total turn around in the USA who wanted to stay out of European wars. Most of the American press actually supported the Germans .

A false flag attack on the British ship the Lusitania, which was carrying Americans to Liverpool from New York orchestrated by the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, got the Americans so riled up they wanted revenge and joined in on the war and beat the Germans.

When the Jews started flocking into Palestine they committed mass murders, massacres and drove hundreds of thousands of Palestinians out of their homes.

The rules of war say that refugees must be able to return to their homes but Israel, who had lost about 250,000 - 500,000 people in concentration camps, became the NAZI's who had persecuted them. Killing and murdering British and Palestinians until the Brits left and Israel was created. They are like the sex offender who was abused themselves as a kid, just passing on the condition down their lineage..

Israel seems to forget that International law was created due to their treatment by the NAZI's in WWII. However since the treaties signed in the 40's Israel has been run like a terrorist state, massacring refugees in camps like Sabra and Shatila in Lebanon which ex Israeli PM Ariel Sharon as defence Minister at the time was found responsible for.

However this was far from the only time Israel has committed war crimes and breached international law always with the US protectinng them from world comdemnation by vetoing any security council resolution that comes to a UN vote. The most recent vote was blocked the other day, the Council drafted a statement calling for a ceasefire, but the statement was vetoed by the US. You can watch the actual debate here.

Of course this all goes back to 19th century Rothschild Zionism which has used the Jewish people as a tool to get their way in the Middle East. Don't you find it funny that you can debate any historical fact but the only one that is not in dispute is that 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust ("Burnt Offering" - in Hebrew). 

This is a fact that cannot be argued about, and doing so would get you jailed in most European countries. You can't say only 5 1/2 million died it must be is a perfect 6 million Jews that died. Was the Holocaust an offering to their God to allow their self fullfilling prophecy to succeed in getting the Jews back to Israel?

Remember the quotes during the war, when Germany offered to sent Hungarian Jews to Israel instead of the work/death camps.

"One Cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland"

"When they asked me, couldn’t you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said, ‘NO!’ and I say again ‘NO!’ … one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance."

Yitzhak Gruenbaum

After the creation of the Israeli state, the Stern Gang and Irgun Israeli terrorists, who killed so many Palestinians, British, American and other nationalities in their fight for independence all became members of the IDF. 

So the IDF is the Jewish army and it's based on terrorists. In fact the first leader of Israel was the head of a terrorist group and there have been 3 Presidents or Prime Ministers who were in these terrorist gangs. I wonder if that is the reason the IDF is so callous and acts like it does?

There is too much too go into this subject without being called a racist, anti-semite or have Hasbara and BOT haters in the comment section.

However history is history and it repeats itself over and over.

Remember you can be a Jew and not Israeli or Zionist and you can be a Zionist and not a Jew or an Israeli Zionist atheist.

The politicians call for the mothers to be killed so that they can't spawn any more Palestinian "snakes" and the racist language in the Knesset is appalling.

Remember if you agree Israel is a terrorist state, causing false flag attacks to blame on Muslims like 9.11 or the USS Liberty or the Lavon Affair where they bombed Brits and Americans in Eygpt to blame on Muslims then you have to be scared that they have nukes, especially when you read the Samson Option.

This was a policy of aiming nukes at Russia and Europe in case they were overrun by Muslims so they could take the whole world down with them, terrorists or rational players in a dangerous area of the world terrorising the Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese?

They commit assassinations overseas, killing innocent Iranian scientists just in case they were working on a nuclear bomb, kill peaceful protesters on the Mavi Marmara in international waters like pirates, threaten the world with nuclear annihilation, and they have had many, many massacres of the Gazan people who have just had their only lifeline of food cut off by the terrorist state.

Please comment carefully, I have nothing against non racist Israeli's and deplore terrorism whether it comes from Gaza or Tel Aviv, I just want a peaceful end to this sore on our international conscience. Just please do not call me an anti-Semite, which is the usual tactic to discredit someone attacking Israeli foreign policy, as I have nothing against Jews, just the Zionist State Of Israel when it breaks international law and does not keep it's part in treaties signed by both parties.

By Dark Politricks

© 2021 Dark Politricks

Killing the Islamic State

Killing The Islamic State

By Dark Politricks

ISIS or "Islamic State" as they call themselves, is as barbaric a group as they come. However the misnomer of the term Islamic State is being used to justify attacks on all Muslims whether they are fundamentalists or moderates.

Not all Muslims are the same just as not all Christians or Jews are. The same goes for Atheists, Buddhists and any other group of people on this planet whether the Daily Mail tells you differently or not.

Whilst ISIS may believe they are an Islamic State or a new Caliphate for the 21st century. Other Islamic States such as Iran and Saudi Arabia are fighting or preparing to fight against them. 

Not all Islamic States are the same either whether they put that title in their countries name or not. 

There have been many Islamic Caliphates ( Islamic Governments ) throughout history and as with most religions the concept itself is split on tribal lines with Sunnis believing that the leader of any Caliphate should be elected by the Muslim people themselves whilst the Shia's believe that only a direct descendant from Muhammad's family can call himself a leader.

History shows that Islamic Governments who ruled from the Middle East to Europe, North Africa and at one point encompassing half of Spain, had at times more welcoming views to other religions than even the Christian Empires of the time. They allowed Jews and Christians to live amongst them and society was pluralistic as it could be under the circumstances of the age. Not all empires were welcoming but during the "golden age" of Islam the leaders of their lands did nothing to harm people of different belief systems living amongst them.

At one point the Umayyad Caliphate covered 5.17 million square miles, making it the largest empire the world had yet seen, and the fifth-largest ever to exist in history. The Ottoman Empire was Islamic in nature and trade, science and culture flourished throughout Islamic States at various points.

It was never the home to such people as those now calling themselves the new Islamic Caliphate.

However ISIS, just like the Taliban with their fundamentalist nature,believe in a strict interpretation of the Koran, and therefore ban music, dancing, and many modern items which seems to contradict directly their love of social media as a tool to spread their message on YouTube and Facebook. Most importantly pictures of the prophet are banned 100%. We have all witnessed the attacks on journalists who print cartoons of him, and it seems to be the ultimate insult that one can take to many Muslims around the world.

It seems as if these people believe the 7th century was the end of all human advancement in Culture, Science and Ethics.

Most importantly this group of people believe that it is okay to kill any human, whether woman, child or OAP, Christian or Muslim, who doesn't believe in their cruel barbaric form of governance.

You may have seen all the videos, accompanied by beautiful Islamic music, as people in cars film themselves doing drive by shootings on main roads in northern Iraq. Swerving back to ensure the occupants of any vehicle are killed fully and properly and any survivors of their attacks are filmed pleading for their lives before being shot in dug outs or cut to bits with knives and swords. They seem to think this indiscriminate slaughter is a propaganda tool for anyone witnessing it and they seem to be right as many young people flock to the Middle East to join their cause.

Even with all the numerous witnesses and dead victims appearing all over the place people, websites, news stations such as FOX and even forensic analysts are claiming that the recently heavily edited ISIS videos of Jihad John beheading captured journalists and aid workers, and even the burning alive of the captured Syrian pilot, are actually faked or staged.

Why ISIS would need to stage brutal killings when they have proven themselves to be sick murdering bastards by raping young girls and killing opponents by the truck load I don't know. 

I have seen videos of whole convoys of trucks carrying captured Iraqi males being driven to a ditch where they are taken and shot. These are in no way heavily edited films and many are shot on phone cameras by the soldiers fighting for ISIS themselves.

However leaving aside any debate on fakery when it comes to beheadings, what I do know is that the rise of ISIS is a foreign policy error of the axis of war, and the US/UK's training and funding of "moderate" anti Assad groups like the Free Syrian Army have not helped one bit.

These groups have shown themselves to be just as barbaric as the rest of the groups fighting in Syria and any funding or training by Qatar, Saudi Arabia or the CIA have just helped to make ISIS into one of the most formidable terrorist groups in histpry.

We can all follow the trail of this conflict back to the "successful" overthrow of Gaddafi in Libya, a country which is now a mess and a huge training base for pro ISIS groups and then to Iraq and Afghanistan and 9.11.

From our intervention in Iraq, which was basically three countries held together by a Western backed dictator, to our war on the Taliban who only asked for some proof of Osama bin-Laden's guilt in the 9.11 attacks, before being denied it and bombed into Halliburton's pockets, the foreign policy decisions of our leaders have either been totally foolish or carefully planned to ensure we have a well equipped army to fight for the next few decades.

We can even go all the way back to the 1st World War and the Balfour Agreement which let Jews immigrate to Palestine in return for US help for Britain in the war, and then the carving up of captured Ottoman Empire holdings into countries that never existed such as Iraq.

Yes our foreign policy is immoral and imbalanced with support for dictators one moment when they serve our purposes and then their overthrow when they stop being useful. To be honest it did seem as if the Middle East was a whole lot calmer when Gaddafi and Hussein were in power.

To go back to the concept of a Caliphate, the whole area from Africa to Iraq and Afghanistan is tribal and localised in nature. These tribes have fought each other for centuries and it was only when their lands were controlled by Caliphate leaders, dictators, and leaders of Western Empire that they seemed to settle and stop their religious and tribal strife.

Take that firm grip away and the old rivalries return unabated.

Personally I have no love for any organised religion and whether it's the break up of the Roman Empire, Henry VIII leaving the Catholic Church and setting up the Church of England so he could get his leg over, or Protestants and Catholics fighting in Ireland, Christians cannot claim to be any less tribal when it comes to irrational belief systems.

One must also remember that Islam is the 3rd branch of the Abrahamic faith.

Please remember that the first books of the old Testament, which allow for the stoning to death of adulterers and other capital punishments for eating shellfish and other stupid laws were at one stage all carried out by Jews, Christians and Muslims.

The fact that Jews are now mostly atheists and Christians have followed their own testament based on the belief that Jesus was the Messiah doesn't take anything away from the core beliefs that all 3 religions once held, and the laws and punishments dealt out for breaking them.

The fact we are not criticising Islamic States like Saudi Arabia for their beheadings whilst attacking the new Islamic State for theirs is total hypocrisy.

Iran's stoning to death of people can be seen on websites along with Iraqi's brutal slaying of rapists in which the whole male community take part in the killing.

Video proof of such "punishments" can all be found on certain "death sites" on the Internet if you want to look hard enough for them.

So whilst we are no way clean when it comes to the rise of ISIS, we should absolutely oppose it for its fundamentalist religious nature.

The fact that I would like Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Taliban to be classed in the same group takes nothing away from the brutality we are facing from this group of 7th century loving killers.

We may have helped stir the pot, and even funded the initial groups who became part of ISIS.

Most definitely the criminal Bandar-Bush enterprise needs it's terrorist tentacles chopping off ASAP.

The close ties between oil rich Saudi Arabia, it's ex ambassador and now terrorist group funding Prince Bandar and the Bush family, whose tarnished history goes way back to Prescott Bush and his Nazi funding days, is long over due some legal oversight.

We have funded Islamic groups to fight Communism and then used them to destabilise countries we wanted to encroach into. The history of our involvement is there for anyone who wants to see it.

One only need research Operation Gladio and Gladio 2 to see why we have allowed these groups to flourish and the benefits we got from allowing them to.

However once again blowback is going to bite the hand that fed it hard and fast.

To get down to basics I don't want to see anymore UK working class men sign up for the Army or RAF to go and fight ISIS.

We have already fought and lost against similar terrorist groups in Afghanistan and Iraq so why keep the military industrial complexes wheels waxed with tax payers money?

Anyway the UK Armed Forces are no match to anyone's anymore due to cuts from Tory and Labour governments. Faced with ISIS captured US anti-aircraft weapons from fleeing Iraqi forces I wouldn't be surprised to see a lot more English people being beheaded by Jihad John or burned alive in cages if we were to return to the killing fields of Iraq and Syria.

The UK military cannot even face the threat from a resurgent Russia, no matter how many times our Eurofighter Typhoons have to be scrambled to fend off Russian Bombers from the coast of Cornwall.

We have cut our armed forces to the bare bones. We are certainly not fit for any war worth fighting unless Jersey tried invading Sussex.

Anyway, on a side note, I wonder why Cornwall is Russia's target for "probing"?

It couldn't be anything to do with the huge amount of under-water cables taking Internet and Phone messages across the Atlantic to the USA from Europe could it? Or is it just the western edge of NATO's Europe?

Remember folks if the war in Ukraine actually gets hot between Russia and NATO then China's recent demo of a laser fired into space to destroy a satellite it had "no use for" or in other words, a warning to the USA that they could take down any US satellites they wanted, making the techno dependent US military redundant, will become true. Russia will most certainly do the same.

Russia is well-known to have far superior missiles and rockets than the US and it would be no surprise to see Satellites falling from the skies during the first days of any war.

So whilst some ignorant people may feel that a hot war with Russia over Ukraine and broken promises post Berlin wall are worth going head into, some other fools think that re-sending defeated forces back into Iraq to bomb ISIS from afar will defeat them.

If we want to crush ISIS, and we should, then we should allow the countries most involved to do the fighting. We should also stop funding Nazi's in Kiev and ask Russia to help by arming its proxies in Syria and Iran. With Russian military weapons these two countries could crush them fully without a Western jet being flown.

Jordan is already keen to bomb the hell out of ISIS because of their burned alive pilot, and Iran has been helping the Shia's in Iraq fight ISIS for a long while now.

The Kurds are also well into a hot war at the other end of Iraq and if only we agreed that ISIS was worse for the world than President Assad of Syria then we could allow Syria a free hand to attack from the north.

Why we keep on insisting that President Assad is the real bad guy when there are clearly worse figures about in the area I don't know. We could easily let Syria and Iran with Russian arms squash ISIS in the middle like a cockroach in the night with a heavy shoe.

Then if only we could get Israel who take US arms, de-construct them, and sell them on to Russia and other countries join the fight from the West it would be game over.

I know that sounds like a dream but logically it makes sense. It's just a shame logic pays no part in foreign affairs or Israel's behaviour in the world.

Israel has one of the biggest and most sophisticated armies in the world yet they spend their time either setting up fake al-Qaeda groups to then "catch" or allowing the US to instead. Just like leading a blind and dumb rat to a piece of poisoned cheese.

If only Israel could stop using their military might to crush the cornered and starving people of Gaza and instead realised the threat to their east. Their weaponry would be no match to ISIS if they actually fought them.

However if they are not worried about ISIS then it can only be due to their infiltration of, or setting up of, ISIS networks. Nothing else makes sense.

For the Islamic State, who should in all theory from their previous and past behaviour, hate Jews and Zionists, not try to attack Israel it can only be down to the fact that they are bought and paid for terrorists - like so many al-Qaeda networks before them.

If ISIS do attack Israel then they will have a real enemy to fight for once instead of pretend Iranian nukes and Gazan fire cracker rockets.

They could then join the pincer movement by Assad from the north and the Kurds, and Iraq and Iran from the south to crush this disgusting beast as hard as it likes. They don't even have to hold hands with Iran to do it, they are all neighbours with an unwelcome guest, so they should all want to resolve the problem.

It doesn't matter who created ISIS.

It doesn't matter which Saudi Royals still fund it as their government cries out for help between beheadings every Friday after prayers.

It doesn't matter if ISIS are owned, created or stage-managed actors, they are still scum that need demolishing.

The only thing that matters is that the axis of war doesn't go back into an area they have just left tails dangling between their legs.

If Islamic countries (and hopefully Jewish) can come together in their area of influence to destroy this beast on their own then it will do more for the social cohesion of the Middle East than anything the Western nations have done since World War One when the French and English carved up the lands that created Iraq in the first place.

Let's leave the fighting to the people who have most to lose.

It will be clear to see if ISIS don't attack Israel that something very, very wrong is occurring, and on any account Israel joining Iran to destroy this evil creation can only be a good thing, whether together or by separate means.

Lets just agree to not send anymore of our boys out to these deserts to fight.

We have already done enough damage.

It's someone else's turn to turn the tide.

View the original article on www.darkpolitricks.com.