Russia Links Crocus Terrorists To Ukrainian Funding Source
By Dark Politricks
A report by Russian investigators has confirmed payment from Ukraine in cryptocurrency from the perpetrators of the terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall in Moscow.
Scott Ritter, a former Iraqi UN arms Inspector who tried to stop the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003 has said publicly that the attack does not look like an ISIS style attack, and the fact that the attackers planned on escaping alive to Ukraine rather than dying like martyrs is a sign that it was a cover for the Tajik hitmen who were seemingly hired over Telegram by Ukrainian special forces.
With the West so eager to claim that Ukraine was not behind the attack just minutes after the concert hall attack one must ask how did they know when the perpetrators had not even been caught and interrogated at that time.
That alone and the pre-warning to US citizens to stay away from public spaces specifically "Music Concerts", yet no back-channel communication to Russia about how they knew of the attack and providing evidence of foreknowledge is enough to leave the Western intelligence agencies such as the CIA and MI6 on a list of possible suspects.
It seems that because Ukraine can no longer fight the Russian advance directly due to the majority of it's NATO supplied tanks and missile defence systems having been destroyed as well as estimates ranging from 400,000 to 1,000,000 million dead soldiers, they are now resorting to terrorist tactics inside Russia.
From this video, you can see that the state is happily sending school kids off to the front lines to fulfil the USA's wish to fight Russia down to the last Ukrainian, whether this means losing a whole generation of citizens from the very young, to the very old.
It seems that as Russia has already destroyed Ukraine's NATO-trained first two Armies it is now unfortunately tasked to destroy an army of students and press-ganged people dragged from their homes or off the street.
The world does not realise that the situation here is as dangerous as the Cuban missile crisis, but even more so due to the size of the nuclear bombs now being used by each side.
However it seems the roles are reversed though, and if Putin is JFK there is no one home at the White House to play Khrushchev and come to the negotiating table which Russia has been wanting to do ever since it first negotiated a peace settlement in the early stages of the war in Belarus and then Turkey.
The Ukrainian negotiator who initialled the peace deal ready for Zelenskyy to sign has been publicly speaking about the deal and wonders why it is was never fully signed.
Here, Ray McGovern, ex CIA, and a member of a Security Analysts for Sanity group that tries to bring some balance to this mad world, with other ex-US intelligence and military members like Scott Ritter, gives an interesting view often dismissed by Western news services.
In this video he talks about how there was a peace agreement, how Russia pulled its long line of tanks pointing towards Kyiv out as a sign of good faith so that negotiations could go forward, and how Boris Johnson was sent to Zelenskyy to tell him not to proceed.
It seems that Zelenskyy made a Faustian bargain with NATO in that they would give him milirtay aid, pay for his whole government's wages and pensions using money from Western tax payers, and and continue until the last Ukrainian.
Let's just hope that any terrorism in Russia that has been initiated by the NATO-backed Ukraine, and especially the CIA and MI6, has not put paid to any hopes of a peace settlement.
If someone with a modicum of sense on the Ukrainian side wants to negotiate peace, let's hope the Crocus massacre of kids at a music concert is not the end of any chance to resolve this war without Russia having to kill all these poor Ukrainian kids sent to the front lines.
The massacre is not something I would wish to have my country's hands involved in, and if they have been covertly supporting terrorist groups to attack the Russian capital, then I hope Russia keeps the level of patience and calm it has done so far, and is still willing to talk peace.
Israel is a terrorist state but do the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?
By Dark Politricks
I am re-posting this article from a couple of years ago as the circumstances of Israel attacking Gaza and Hamas launching attacks on Israel is again repeating itself yet again. It is a cycle that has continued since Hamas was born, or rather created by Israeli intelligence to split the Palestinians into two warring factions, as Fatah / PLO were the dominant political force before Hamas, and although Hamas control Gaza after an election years ago, Fatah continue to reign in the West Bank, although a corrupt and weak state if it could even be called one.
I am against all terrorism, and I think Hamas's attack on 7th October 2023 went too far killing innocent people when they should have just concentrated on their enemy, the IDF. How they were able to cross into Israel so easily with so many men and weapons and carry out their massacre is a question the war mongering evil Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, needs to pay a price for allowing Israel to be caught asleep, and allow Hamas to attack so easily.
However when Israel talks about terrorism, and terrorist attacks they forget how the country was formed. Israel was created through terrorism, with Israeli terrorist groups killing first British soldiers and then massacring Palestinians and forcing them to flee from their homes.
The "plan" this time, in response to Hamas's attack, was for Israel to ethnically cleanse Gaza, forcing all 2 million Palestinians into refugee camps in Egypt. Egypt knows this and this is why they are preventing any Palestinians escaping through their Rafa route into Gaza. Israel doesn't want a two state solution, the growth of illegal settlers proves this as they are making it impossible for a viable Palestinian state to be born.
The only true solution is a secular Israel with Palestinians and Jews living side by side. However the fervently racist Jews who honestly believe in their magic book, and that they lived in Israel thousands of years ago being God's chosen people, need re-education and some lessons on logic if this is to work. Either these racists need to be removed somewhere away from the Arabs they currently harass on a daily basis, chanting racist songs, mocking the deaths of Mohammed and Jesus, spitting at passers by and even throwing rubbish and bottles of urine onto their market stalls from stolen Palestinian homes above, or some two state system needs to be concocted to prevent these racists attacking Palestinians.
These Jewish supremacists need to be removed to the north of Israel if one state will work, as its these super racist Jews who hate Christians and Muslims that are filling the current Knesset Government and always call for extermination of Palestinians, want the whole land to themselves and have no thought about launching a war that kills thousands of children.
Anyway here is the article - Israel was born out of terrorism, to claim they are now being threatened by it is hypocritical, Israel IS a terrorist state.
.........
As Israel carries on it's "defence" of it's people by blowing up news organisation buildings and stealing any photos that could contain incriminating images, as well as force people out of their family homes to give over to Israeli's with no chance to take all their belongings I have to ask - why does no-one ever ask the US President who always says "Israel has a right to defend itself" whether the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?
Surely a people under illegal occupation, in which they have been deserted by all their old Arab friends now in bed with Israel and the US, have a right to defend themselves from being annihilated whenever there is an election due or Bibi Netanyahu is about to appear in court?
What these racists don't realise is that the tide is turning against their evil barbaric torture of a whole people. More people in New York, once a staunch pro-Israei ally, is now seeing New Yorkers protest in favour of the Palestinians despite the biased news they recieve from CNN, FOX and MSNBC. Even politicians who are usually all sucking on the teat of AIPAC money have stood up in Congress and in public to defend the Palestinians, something unheard of during the wars against GAZA in the eary 21st century.
They have created so many "facts on the ground" that a two state solution is almost now impossible. So because the rest of the world with a conscience won't let Israel destroy a whole people despite the US giving them a blank cheque to basically do so, therefore there will be only one solution left in the end. A one state, non Jewish, non Islamic, secular state from the sea to the river that both people's will have to learn to live in.
Rashida Tlaib, a Palestinian-American representative of Michigan, also delivered a tearful address to Congress. Speaking of the atrocities that Palestinians face, she questioned the US government’s “unconditional support” of Israel. Recalling how police shot rubber bullets and gas at protestors in Ferguson, Bush said she learned then that “the same equipment that they [the police] used to brutalize us is the same equipment we send to the Israeli military to police and brutalize Palestinians”.
Bernie Sanders called on the Biden administration and fellow lawmakers to “no longer be apologists for the right-wing Netanyahu government and its undemocratic and racist behavior”.
If the United States is going to be a credible voice on human rights on the global stage, we must uphold international standards of human rights consistently, even when it’s politically difficult. We must recognize that Palestinian rights matter. Palestinian lives matter. This comes after an expected weak position taken by Biden in which he said that "Israel has a right to defend itself" - what about Palestinians?
Do they not also have a right, even a duty seeing they are imprisoned by a country igorning international law, to fight back against their plight?
Remember Israel was born out of terrorism, Israeli terrorism, massacres of Palestinians, and before that, the British Soliders that controlled the Palestinian Mandate.
The smouldering ashes of the King David Hotel blown up by Israeli terrorists in the 40's
So when the Israeli's were "building" their nation by using terrorism to "create facts on the ground" in the late 40's by massacring the Palestinians and forcing them from their homes, the world still stood back and did nothing. There were a few measly wars defeated by the US armed Israeli military from ex Palestinan allies such as Eygpt, Syria and Jordan who have now fallen by the wayside.
This of course caused more massacres, heads chopped off and of course the famous bombing of the King David Hotel, pictured above, which was the British HQ in Palestine at the time. Multiple Presidents and Prime Ministers can find their roots in the terror gangs that pushed the British out of Palestine and let them go on a murderous rampage.
There used to be a video on here by Blackstone Intelligence covering this matter but obviously it has now been taken down. However if been reading my site you will know I have had many historical documents on here related to the, breaches of International law such as the illegal piracy of the Mavi Marmara in international waters where a US citizen was shot 9 times in the back, caught on camera, but hardly mentioned in the US news as it would "embaress an ally".
The same sort of logic that President Johnson used when Israel tried a false flag attack on the USS Liberty, flying US flags, and overhearing their massacres of Eygptians, Johnson almost nuked Eygpt because he believed the lie that it was that country that had attacked the ship. Survivors and Israeli pilots overheard on radio telling their commanders that the ship was American told a different story altogether. Twice planes sent by nearby US ships were ordered back by Defence Secretery McNamara that could have helped the struggling ship.
I have a very famous talk by the ex Zionist turned Christian, and therefore anti-semite or self hating Jew, Benjamin Freedman, who gave a very famous speech that put a very different spin on the reasons for WW1 and WWII. You can read the transcript and listen to it here.
We should also all know by now that the Rothschilds control most things related to money, pulling their puppets in parliaments and state houses all over the world. They also run most of the central banks in the world where they can print money on worthless paper, lend it to the government, and our taxes go to paying back these usury loans.
However there modus operandi has always been to make money from war. They lend loans to both sides and then collect reparations from the loser and the payback from the winner.
Israel and Zionism is a Rothschild operation, created between the British who were fighting the Ottoman Empire in WWI and Germany who was winning the World War 1. Germany offered to call the war off with no reparations, lets just all go home and forget about it, and they were the side winning. It was a no lose situation for the soldiers, but not for the bankers.
The Rothschild's didn't like this as it meant no money from reparations and they went to the British Government and promised them that they could get the USA into the war and win it. However in return they wanted some form of document that gave them Israel.
The famous Balfour agreement was a document sent to Lord Rothschild that promised to create a land for Zionist Jews if they brought the Americans into the war and in 3 months after the German offer to call the war off there was a total turn around in the USA who wanted to stay out of European wars. Most of the American press actually supported the Germans .
A false flag attack on the British ship the Lusitania, which was carrying Americans to Liverpool from New York orchestrated by the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, got the Americans so riled up they wanted revenge and joined in on the war and beat the Germans.
When the Jews started flocking into Palestine they committed mass murders, massacres and drove hundreds of thousands of Palestinians out of their homes.
The rules of war say that refugees must be able to return to their homes but Israel, who had lost about 250,000 - 500,000 people in concentration camps, became the NAZI's who had persecuted them. Killing and murdering British and Palestinians until the Brits left and Israel was created. They are like the sex offender who was abused themselves as a kid, just passing on the condition down their lineage..
Israel seems to forget that International law was created due to their treatment by the NAZI's in WWII. However since the treaties signed in the 40's Israel has been run like a terrorist state, massacring refugees in camps like Sabra and Shatila in Lebanon which ex Israeli PM Ariel Sharon as defence Minister at the time was found responsible for.
However this was far from the only time Israel has committed war crimes and breached international law always with the US protectinng them from world comdemnation by vetoing any security council resolution that comes to a UN vote. The most recent vote was blocked the other day, the Council drafted a statement calling for a ceasefire, but the statement was vetoed by the US. You can watch the actual debate here.
Of course this all goes back to 19th century Rothschild Zionism which has used the Jewish people as a tool to get their way in the Middle East. Don't you find it funny that you can debate any historical fact but the only one that is not in dispute is that 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust ("Burnt Offering" - in Hebrew).
This is a fact that cannot be argued about, and doing so would get you jailed in most European countries. You can't say only 5 1/2 million died it must be is a perfect 6 million Jews that died. Was the Holocaust an offering to their God to allow their self fullfilling prophecy to succeed in getting the Jews back to Israel?
Remember the quotes during the war, when Germany offered to sent Hungarian Jews to Israel instead of the work/death camps.
"One Cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland"
"When they asked me, couldn’t you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said, ‘NO!’ and I say again ‘NO!’ … one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance."
After the creation of the Israeli state, the Stern Gang and Irgun Israeli terrorists, who killed so many Palestinians, British, American and other nationalities in their fight for independence all became members of the IDF.
So the IDF is the Jewish army and it's based on terrorists. In fact the first leader of Israel was the head of a terrorist group and there have been 3 Presidents or Prime Ministers who were in these terrorist gangs. I wonder if that is the reason the IDF is so callous and acts like it does?
There is too much too go into this subject without being called a racist, anti-semite or have Hasbara and BOT haters in the comment section.
However history is history and it repeats itself over and over.
Remember you can be a Jew and not Israeli or Zionist and you can be a Zionist and not a Jew or an Israeli Zionist atheist.
Remember if you agree Israel is a terrorist state, causing false flag attacks to blame on Muslims like 9.11 or the USS Liberty or the Lavon Affair where they bombed Brits and Americans in Eygpt to blame on Muslims then you have to be scared that they have nukes, especially when you read the Samson Option.
They commit assassinations overseas, killing innocent Iranian scientists just in case they were working on a nuclear bomb, kill peaceful protesters on theMavi Marmara in international waters like pirates, threaten the world with nuclear annihilation, and they have had many, many massacres of the Gazan peoplewho have just had their only lifeline of food cut off by the terrorist state.
Please comment carefully, I have nothing against non racist Israeli's and deplore terrorism whether it comes from Gaza or Tel Aviv, I just want a peaceful end to this sore on our international conscience. Just please do not call me an anti-Semite, which is the usual tactic to discredit someone attacking Israeli foreign policy, as I have nothing against Jews, just the Zionist State Of Israel when it breaks international law and does not keep it's part in treaties signed by both parties.
The Rothschilds and Rockefellers, plus the other families, the mainstream media wants us to believe control the world
By Dark Politricks
This is from an article I saw in my Twitter newspaper earlier today. It always changes daily and you should check the site out to see what new articles are there each day. It appears at the top of the site.
It comes from a mainstream outlet, www.indiatimes.com and I have no idea if they are putting this information out there to mock people who DO believe the world is controlled by a tiny % of people who all attend Bilderberg and Bohemian Grove meetings with no press, are billionaires, and pull the strings of politicians.
Or whether they are putting this out there, with a "Ha ha, conspiracy theorists believe...", but in such a way as to get the information out without being banned or prevented from printing. Either way everyone should read it as if you know history, you will know that a lot of what is mentioned is in fact true.
I am reproducing the article to get it out to more people, but you can find the original article here: www.indiatimes.com. Make of it what you will. If you have been doing your homework the names will be very familiar and you will know much of their historical deeds and desires to control the population.
By Rishabh Banerji
This is about the fascinating conspiracy theory that claims these most powerful families in the world own 99% of the wealth, leaving 1% for the rest of the world to fight over.
These are families that have a hold in almost every sphere of life, be it politics, business or entertainment. The 13 bloodlines are said to have connections to wealth and power that are simply unimaginable. And these families span from Europe to China.
The leading researcher behind the Illuminati families is a man named, Fritz Springmeier, an author and educator, and he has presented some of the most compelling details about the Illuminati bloodline.
Before you read the following article about Illuminati families, it is imperative that you realise that all these are popular points of view and remain just a conspiracy theory, unless proven otherwise. But goddamn, is it a great conspiracy theory!
"I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply." - Nathan Mayer Rothschild
Some say, in an attempt to restore "balance" in the world, a New World Order was formed. Formed by America and Europe's most elite (both in terms of wealth and power) with historical roots that date back centuries. This power-house formed by 13 families is known to be controlling practically everything around the globe.
From political parties around the world, courthouses, educational institutions, natural resources, foreign policies, food, national economies, media houses, even terrorist organisations. They are the ones who decide where and when the next terror attack is going to happen, they decide when the markets will fall, they decide when a new government needs to take over, they decide what happens at the UN, they decide practically everything.
"The US and UK governments' relentless backing for the global spread of genetically modified seeds was in fact the implementation of a decades long policy of the Rockefeller Foundation since the 1930's, when it funded Nazi eugenics research -- i.e. mass-scale population reduction, and control of darker-skinned races by an Anglo-Saxon white elite. As some of these circles saw it, war as a means of population reduction was costly and not that efficient." - F. William Engdahl in his book "Seeds of Destuction"
What we didn't know
Modern day democracy, like the way we know it, is not more than 250 years old. The world, as we know it, has always been ruled by the ones with absolute power, those who knew how to control wealth and resources. By those who knew how to control their people, by hook or by crook. The New World Order aims to work on a similar philosophy of absolute power and control, but on a global scale.The plan is to secretly have a single body governing the planet with the elite sitting right on top of the food chain, leaving the rest of the world to fight it out for that 1% of the global economy.
Scarier is the fact that they apparently also want to keep control of the global population. They want the global population to be just under a billion, leaving the Earth's resources for their own exclusive use. And to keep the population in check, they are willing to go to any extent, even plan scientifically engineered global population control methods like viruses, vaccines and genetically modified food. It is also said that these families even hold the cure for terminal diseases like cancer and AIDS, but don't want to release it to the public because then there'll be a cure. And a cure is not good for the pharma business.
"The master planners devised the strategy of a merger - a Great Merger - among nations. But before such a merger can be consummated, and the United States becomes just another province in a New World Order, there must at least be the semblance of parity among the senior partners in the deal. How does one make the nations of the world more nearly equal? The Insiders determined that a two-prong approach was needed; use American money and know-how to build up your competitors, while at the same time use every devious strategy you can devise to weaken and impoverish this country. The goal is not to bankrupt the United States. Rather, it is to reduce our productive might, and therefore our standard of living, to the meager subsistence level of the socialized nations of the world. The plan is not to bring the standard of living in less developed countries up to our level, but to bring ours down to meet theirs coming up... It is your standard of living which must be sacrificed on the altar of the New World Order." - Gary Allen in his book "The Rockefeller File"
13 Families that Secretly Control the World
1. The Astor Bloodline
2. The Bundy Bloodline
3. The Collins Bloodline
4. The DuPont Bloodline
5. The Freeman Bloodline
6. The Kennedy Bloodline
7. The Li Bloodline
8. The Onassis Bloodline
9. The Rockefeller Bloodline
10. The Russell Bloodline
11. The Van Duyn Bloodline
12. The Merovingian Bloodline
13. The Rothschild Bloodline
True or not, the whole concept is a bit unsettling. Just imagine being played around like puppets.
What do you feel about the concept of having one secret cabal of super rich families that control governments, big business, big pharma, silicon valley, the media and the MIC?
This article has been taken from the BBC Website and I am reproducing it here, as it was from my old site and the article was not copied across when I moved here. So I used the Wayback Machine to get a copy. I did this in case the original ever disappears so that there is record of an “official” news establishment admitting that such an all invasive privacy destroying system exists and has done so for quite a while.
By Andrew Bomford of BBC Radio 4′s PM programme
Imagine a global spying network that can eavesdrop on every single phone call, fax or e-mail, anywhere on the planet.
It sounds like science fiction, but it’s true.
Two of the chief protagonists – Britain and America – officially deny its existence. But the BBC has confirmation from the Australian Government that such a network really does exist and politicians on both sides of the Atlantic are calling for an inquiry.
On the North Yorkshire moors above Harrogate they can be seen for miles, but still they are shrouded in secrecy. Around 30 giant golf balls, known as radomes, rise from the US military base at Menwith Hill.
Linked to the NSA
Inside is the world’s most sophisticated eavesdropping technology, capable of listening-in to satellites high above the earth.
The base is linked directly to the headquarters of the US National Security Agency (NSA) at Fort Mead in Maryland, and it is also linked to a series of other listening posts scattered across the world, like Britain’s own GCHQ.
The power of the network, codenamed Echelon, is astounding.
Every international telephone call, fax, e-mail, or radio transmission can be listened to by powerful computers capable of voice recognition. They home in on a long list of key words, or patterns of messages. They are looking for evidence of international crime, like terrorism.
Open Oz
The network is so secret that the British and American Governments refuse to admit that Echelon even exists. But another ally, Australia, has decided not to be so coy.
The man who oversees Australia’s security services, Inspector General of Intelligence and Security Bill Blick, has confirmed to the BBC that their Defence Signals Directorate (DSD) does form part of the network.
“As you would expect there are a large amount of radio communications floating around in the atmosphere, and agencies such as DSD collect those communications in the interests of their national security”, he said.
Asked if they are then passed on to countries like Britain and America, he said: “They might be in certain circumstances.”
But the system is so widespread all sorts of private communications, often of a sensitive commercial nature, are hoovered up and analysed.
Journalist Duncan Campbell has spent much of his life investigating Echelon. In a report commissioned by the European Parliament he produced evidence that the NSA snooped on phone calls from a French firm bidding for a contract in Brazil. They passed the information on to an American competitor, which won the contract.
“There’s no safeguards, no remedies, ” he said, “There’s nowhere you can go to say that they’ve been snooping on your international communications. Its a totally lawless world.”
Breaking the silence
Both Britain and America deny allegations like this, though they refuse to comment further. But one former US army intelligence officer has broken the code of silence.
Colonel Dan Smith told the BBC that while this is feasible, it is not official policy:
“Technically they can scoop all this information up, sort through it, and find what it is that might be asked for,” he said. “But there is no policy to do this specifically in response to a particular company’s interests.”
Legislators on both sides of the Atlantic are beginning to sit up and take notice. Republican Congressman Bob Barr has persuaded congress to open hearings into these and other allegations.
In December he is coming to Britain to raise awareness of the issue. In an interview with the BBC he accused the NSA of conducting a broad “dragnet” of communications, and “invading the privacy of American citizens.”
He is joined in his concerns by a small number of politicians In Britain. Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker has tabled a series of questions about Menwith Hill, but has been met with a wall of silence.
“There’s no doubt it’s being used as a listening centre,” he said, “There’s no doubt it’s being used for US interests, and I’m not convinced that Britain’s interests are being best served by this.”
The original article on the BBC news site has actually been removed but you can still find a copy on the Wayback Machine Archive. I wouldn't be surprised if that site is removed soon due to "Cancel Culture", when people want all their Internet History "Scrubbed" from the web this is one site that they ask to have archived content remove from.
I recently wrote a piece called the Pentagon Attack which contained a number of videos. However, it also contained a number of questions related to the 9.11 event as a whole. This article is a summary containing the events regarding the Pentagon attack alone.
If you have the time I suggest you watch all these videos, as together they can be used to make a reasonable conclusion about what really happened at the Pentagon. Even if the first documentary has one conclusion please watch the second talk as it will explain the evidence piece by piece and can be used to explain why the first documentary comes to it's conclusion.
Why is the Pentagon Attack such a point of contention?
There are a number of reasons including:
1. The conflicting witness accounts. Some witnesses claim to have seen a plane fly over the building, some into it. Others claim to have heard the explosion first and then seen a plane in the sky.
2. The physical evidence. Some witnesses and photos show a clean front lawn outside the official impact zone. Other photos show plane debris. Witnesses claim to have walked through the holes in the wall and to have not seen any evidence of a plane at all.
3. Pilots and aircraft experts claim that the manoeuvre made by Nawaf Hazmi, the alleged terrorist, was too complicated and fast for even expert pilots to have made let alone an amateur with poor piloting skills. Other people claim the flight path could have been made even if it would have meant a huge plane flying at high speeds just metres above the Pentagon lawn, something engineers suggest is impossible.
Due to the US government refusing to release all CCTV and camera footage that may have caught the impact of the plane and put conspiracy theories to bed the Pentagon attack has been used by believers of the official story to beat many 911 Truthers over the head with. Many people see the Pentagon attack as a way to discredit the whole 911 Truth movement by claiming that they are ignoring physical evidence and witness accounts. If you can be dismissed at the Pentagon then your theories over the WTC and the whole event can be dismissed as well.
Any talk of missiles, no planes, holograms, lasers from space or mini-nukes are all used to label anyone who looks into the events of 9.11 as crazy. To the uninitiated, it doesn't matter if any of these theories have merits or not because just hearing these theories can make the whole movement look like tinfoil hat-wearing loons. Due to that, people unwilling to question their government can easily dismiss any uncomfortable facts.
Therefore questions about the evidence regarding the Pentagon needs to be looked at and answered if possible. Hopefully these two videos which look at the witness evidence in detail and then a talk by an ex Government official who slots all the pieces together will help.
The facts do not fit the evidence.
The impact zone that is supposedly where Flight 77 hit the Pentagon does not fit the evidence for a number of reasons.
1. The supposed impact zone is the first two floors of a wedge of the building that would have been impossible for a huge Boeing 757 to hit at 400 mph. Not only could a plane not fly that fast and low to the ground without crashing first. The dimensions of the plane do not allow it to create such a small hole.
Many pilots, aircraft specialists, engine designers have all gone on record to state that the down force of a large plane flying that fast and low to the ground would mean it would have crashed way before the walls of the Pentagon. If that had happened the grass outside the impact zone would have been scorched and covered with debris.
The whole plane would NOT have entered the walls of the building.
2. There is a lack of evidence outside this "official" impact zone. No big parts of nose cones, no huge multi-ton engines, and no damage to the lawn in front of the damaged building. In fact, the debris which was found was further along the building in front of a totally different wedge. This is explained later.
Notice how this supposed impact one is on the the first floor, an impossibility for a plane to hit without coming down vertically and not horizontally as we are expected to believe. Notice how there is hardly any plane wreckage outside the building.
3. A plane is made from lightweight materials. It cannot punch its way through 3 rings of re-enforced concrete as it supposedly did at the Pentagon. The following video shows what happens when a plane going at the speed of 475 mph hits just one reinforced concrete wall.
Notice how the wall remains solid and the plane disappears into small pieces. This speed is basically the same speed as Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.
The Official Impact Zone Before The Pentagon Walls Fell In.
Witnesses Dispute Official Story
A number of witnesses who claim to have the seen the plane fly in towards the Pentagon provide contradictory evidence to the official story.
These are all people who have worked in the area of the Pentagon for years. Either Policemen, Arlington Cemetery workers, or aircraft specialists from the Pentagon itself.
The official story relies on a Southern approach to the hole in the wall that is the supposed entry point for Flight 77. However, all these witnesses claim to have witnessed:
-A north bound approach with the plane flying to the right (or over) the Navy Annex in a totally different manner to the official report which requires it to fly to the left of that building.
-A slower speed of the plane. Not a fast 450 mph plane approach as the official story claims.
-A plane that was wobbling, "banking" and correcting its angle - not a direct, fast, straight trajectory.
-All of these witnesses whilst in positions to see the plane come in admit they couldn't see the impact. Most were running away from the direction of the planes impact, covered their heads or were not in a position to see the impact.
-All have refused to change their testimony since it has been revealed to them that it directly contradicts the official story and whilst many now refuse to give further interviews they claim their story is correct.
-The one piece of evidence that corroborates the official story is the testimony of a taxi driver, Lloyd England, who claims to have been hit by the tall light pole that was supposedly bent by the plane as it flew the official trajectory.
However leaving aside the fact that a 450 mph plane hitting a goose or bird can cause a crash, let alone a large metal pole, the witness when confronted with his evidence and how it contradicts all other witness accounts tries to change his story to make it fit with the other witnesses.
He is also caught off tape many times making contradictory statements to the location of his taxi in direct conflict with the physical evidence and photographs which prove his exact location on the day.
He refuses to admit his car was where it was photographed and off camera alludes to the fact that:
"It has nothing to do with the truth it's his story"
"This is too big for me man this is a big thing"
"Man you know this is a world thing happening. I'm a small man."
"I'm not supposed to be involved in this."...."This is for other people, people who have money and all this kind of stuff."
"I'm not supposed to be involved in this, I have nothing."
"It was planned."
He seems to be alluding to be part of a story he has no control over, "a small man in a rich mans story" and he seems to admit to being part of a "story" to make the official story fit the facts. His wife also works for the FBI, although whether that has any importance I do not know.
The conclusion of the documentary is that the plane the witnesses saw didn't hit the Pentagon.
The witnesses who saw the incoming plane should be believed in that the trajectory of the plane was wildly different to the official story and that because they couldn't see the impact of the plane due to it flying over the Pentagon.
This conclusion would fit with the official analysis of the flight data recorder from Flight 77 which shows a discrepancy between the altitude of the plane and the official story.
For this plane to have hit the lamp-post which Lloyd England claims happened the plane would have had to have been 440 feet high!
This is obviously an impossibility.
What is clear from this documentary and the witness statements is that the official story doesn't even fit with the witness statements who are on record seeing a plane fly towards the Pentagon.
Ex Government Official Put Pieces Together
This talk from an ex Reagan administration official, Barbara Honegger, puts the pieces together meticulously in this talk to explain how the witnesses are right, the hole without debris is also correct and that a plane DID hit the Pentagon.
An overview is this:
1. A plane, probably a drone painted in American Airlines colours, did fly into the Pentagon but it flew in the trajectory that the witnesses in the Citizen Investigation Team documentary claimed.
2. The drone was either destroyed before impact or hit the Pentagon causing all the debris that was found near the Heliport terminal. Remember this is NOT the official impact zone which is many yards around the building.
3. The official impact zone was caused by explosives inside the building. This explains why there is no debris outside on the grass. No debris was found inside and why witnesses who walked through the hole to safety claimed to see no evidence of a plane.
4. This second explosion WAS reported on TV, by witnesses and Pentagon employees. The official story had to make this second explosion the plane impact even though the timings were out and the flight path didn't match with the witnesses. However, there is no logical or physical way the damage from this second explosion could have been caused by a huge Boeing 757 flying 400+ mph into the first floor of the Pentagon.
5. Therefore the cover-up involved making this 2nd impact zone the official entry point for the plane even though a plane could never punch its way through 3 huge concrete walls as the video above shows.
6. This also explains perfectly how witnesses saw a plane hit the building, how other witnesses could claim to see no evidence of a plane at the impact zone and why people claim to have seen debris and others NO debris. There were TWO impact zones. One from a plane (drone) and one from an explosion.
Watch the video below to see how she puts all the pieces together and provides the reason for the attack. Without it, no declaration of war could be made which meant that the Pentagon attack WAS the main attack on 9.11. As she points out, it wasGeorge W Bush himself that said that it wasn't until he saw the Pentagon attack that he realised the country was really at war.
Watch Barbara Honegger put the 9.11 Pentagon attack pieces together
Terrorism is not an excuse for the loss of our liberties
By Dark Politricks
The war on terror has been used by the UK government as a battering ram to the rights of the citizens of this country. New laws have been passed including 2 new terrorism acts (2000 and 2006) which have restricted free speech, the rights of demonstrators to protest and have given the police new powers of stop and search and lets not forget the 28 days detention and control orders.
Now you may say "well you have nothing to fear unless you have something to hide" which is a bend over attitude that leads to fascism. I am not a terrorist but nor are most people who have been affected by this new age of fighting terrorism.
Its the thin edge of the wedge which has taken advantage of peoples justifiable fears about terrorist attacks to introduce laws that if only applied to real terrorists would be fine however who can forget the 82 year old Walter Wolfgang who was dragged out of the Labour conference for heckling Jack Straw under the terrorism act in 2005. Or what about Gordon Brown invoking the terrorism act to freeze Iceland's bank accounts during 2008?
Just these two acts alone prove how our government intends to use these new powers for reasons other than fighting terrorism.
Once the public has been forced into a mindset that demands protection from unseen shadowy terrorists and that they must be dealt with severely it then allows the government to widen the scope of what actually constitutes terrorism.
It seems that the US constitution is slowly being eroded bit by bit. I never used to understand the Americans fascination with their right to bear guns however the more I have read up about Thomas Jefferson and the other founding fathers and their desire to protect the people against the tyranny of government it makes perfect sense. I especially love the following two quotes that Jefferson made:
"No man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
"And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not .warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.... The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
I have come to have a renewed respect for the founding fathers of America and the contemporary patriots who want the US government to return to the constitution. The world would be a quieter and probably safer place if it did.
Even though Jefferson and Washington kicked their British rulers out during the war of Independence us Brits must never forget that the father of the revolution was Thomas Paine an Englishman whose books the Age of Reasonand the Rights of Man had enormous influence on the Age of Enlightenment and the revolutions of France and America.
Two new republics were born that decreed that man had inalienable rights that could not be taken away by government. Therefore when people see their government treating their constitution as "just a piece of paper"as George Bush famously called it and trampling over their rights including the right to bear arms as if their inalienable rights were just an outdated idea that had no place in this century then I can see why they get so upset over the 2nd amendment.
Here in the UK its too late as we are currently a disarmed nation since the massacres of Dunblane and Hungerford took our guns away but then unlike the Americans we never had an inalienable right to bare arms anyway.
In fact although the UK passed the first ever bill of rights in 1689 it was never thought necessary for us to have a written constitution like the French and Americans.
I personally think it would be in our own best interests to draw up our own document as soon as possible. Yes we have the Human Rights act of 1998 which the right wing media decries and complains about almost every other day as something that has been imposed on us from Europe. However ridiculous the examples the Daily Mail and Express use to denigrate this act seem we should never feel that getting rid of that act would be in our best interest.
Civil rights have been hard fought and won through years of battle between state and its populace and any document that tries to enshrine our rights for future prosperity should be cherished and held in high esteem. We should also remember that it was British lawyers that drew up the Europen Convention on human rights in 1950, that the act is based on, after the horrors of the second world war. So we should view this act as yet another example of us Brits bringing civil rights to the world rather than Europe imposing some alien concept on us.
From the Magna Carta in 1215, through to John Lockes and Thomas Hobbes social contract between man and the state through to the first Bill of Rights and then the Human Rights act we Brits have been at the forefront of civil rights and we should not let the fear of terrorism allow any of these hard won rights to be taken away as once gone they will probably not come back unless a Liberal Democrat government gets in power which seems most unlikely.
We are slowly walking down the path to a place that I don't want to call home. When George Orwells 1984 starts to become a commentary on modern times then we must all stop and ask ourselves what the hell is going on.
With another round of attacks on civilians by the Israeli Defence Forces in Gaza - Operation Pillar of Defense. I thought it was apt to re-print this article that I originally wrote back when Operation Cast Lead had just finished.
This was the last major round of fighting between the fourth most powerfully equipped army in the world and a bunch of cornered in civilians with nothing to fight back with but stones and firework rockets.
These are rockets that get shot down almost as soon as they are launched and the house they are launched from immediately blown to bits by an Israeli drone or aircraft along with any children or women inside. People who may not have even wanted the rockets fired from their in the first place but had little choice in the matter.
It is not as if Hamas or the Al-Quds Brigade are going to stand in the open and wave a flag saying here I am shoot me now - not when Israel itself fires missiles from within Tel-Aviv a large city and comparable with what Hamas is doing from Gaza City.
However this article is not about the terrible war we are now witnessing (again) but whether we can de-link the name calling of the Israeli Hasbara brigade who label anyone who criticises Israeli actions as anti-semitic. Is it really fair to link criticism of a major military power bombarding women and children with a dislike of a whole religion?
Apparently since 9/11 and then again since Operation Cast Lead attacks classified as being anti-Semitic in the UK have doubled.
These attacks range from verbal and physical abuse, cemetery desecration and the burning down of synagogues. All of this is a shocking indictment of peoples behaviour in the modern world and I am against any form of abuse of a group of people for whatever reason.
However the term "Anti-Semitic" and the claim of being one is used too frequently when its not deserved, especially against those people who speak about Israels foreign policy in a negative light.
Anti-Semitism is a term used to describe prejudice against or hostility towards Jews, often rooted in hatred of their religious/cultural/ethnic background.
Another way of inducing claims of being Anti-Semitic is by discussing Zionism in negative terms. For those people that don't know the difference Zionism is defined as this:
Zionism is the international Jewish political movement that originally supported the reestablishment of a homeland for the Jewish People in Palestine. The area was the Jewish Biblical homeland, called the Land of Israel (Hebrew: Eretz Yisra'el).
Zionism is an ideology and a political movement.
Israel is a country,
and a Jew is someone who follows the Torah.
They are three separate entities and one can be a Jew who does not believe in Zionism or agree with Israels foreign policy.
You can also live in Israel and not be Jewish or you may be a Zionist, as many US Christian politicians claim to be, without being a Jew.
Therefore the three terms are not and should not be interchangeable and accusing opponents of Zionism of anti-semitism is a misnomer.
There are a lot of Jews who do not believe in Zionism mainly because it goes against the true teaching of the Torah and many believe the ideology of Zionism has tried to turn "being Jewish" from one who follows the religion of Judaism, one which anybody can convert to, into a nation or race and one that deserved a homeland.
The Jewish Diaspora believed that they had been expelled from the Holy land for disregarding God's will and that they would only ever return there when God had forgiven them and that their return would be mandated by God's will alone and without the aid of man.
Therefore Zionism was a political movement that tried to fulfil this ancient prophecy by their own means, a self-fulfilling prophecy so to speak and one which went against God's wish.
The great rabbis of the era were very concerned about the rise of Zionism and saw it as a threat to humanity non Jews and Jews alike due to its flagrant disregard to the true teachings of Judaism and disregard to the spiritual leaders of the religion.
Grand Rabbi Joel Teitelbaum, did not mince any words. Straight to the point he called Zionism"the work of Satan", "a sacrilege" and "a blasphemy". He forbade any participation with anything even remotely associated with Zionism and said that Zionism was bound to call the wrath of Godupon His people.
Zionism really came to prominence during the first part of the 20th century with the Balfour declaration of 1917 being the start to mass immigration into Palestine and an act which many claim was a sign of treachery by German Jews. This was because it signified a payment by the British, who controlled Palestine at the time, to the Jews in return for them using their significant influence in American politics to bring the USA into World War I on their side and defeat the Germans.
This was something which probably contributed to Hitlers hatred of the Jews which festered until his rise to power when once again Zionism played a prominent role in the Jewish peoples fate, one which enabled Zionism to claim their prize of a homeland.
During the Second world war the Germans made numerous offers to the west which would have allowed many Jewish people safe passage out of occupied lands. However the Zionists who now had a strong foothold in Palestine and claimed authority over the Jewish people denied these requests because Palestine was ruled out as a destination.
Even when it was known that the Eastern European Jews were dying in their thousands at the hands of the Nazis the Zionists saw their political goal of a Jewish nation in Palestine as more important than the lives of their fellow man.
"when they asked me, "couldn't you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe", I said NO! and I say again, NO!...one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance." - Yitzhak Greenbaum
"The most valuable part of the Jewish nation is already in Palestine, and those Jews living outside Palestineare not too important" - Chaim Weizman
"One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Europe" - Yitzhak Greenbaum
Therefore many Jewish people needlessly died due to the political desires of Zionism during this period and it seems to have paid off after the war, with a little help from Zionist terrorist gangs such as Haganah, the Irgun Zvai Leumi and the Stern Gang who killed many British soldiers and Palestinians in their drive for a Jewish state.
Is it hypocritical for Israel to denounce current Palestinian organisations such as Hamas as terrorists who should not be negotiated with when their own existence as a nation results from terrorist actions against the British and Palestinians? If logic were to decide then the answer would be yes.
In fact numerous Israeli prime ministers have their roots in these terrorist organisations including Menachim Begin who tool part in the King David Hotel bombing which killed 91 people.
Then we have Yitzhak Shamir, who was a leader of the Stern Gang, a terrorist group which was responsible for a string of political assassinations.
We also have a more recent example in Ariel Sharon who initiated the Sabra-Shatila massacre in which between 1000 and 3000 people people were killed.
Therefore claims of moral superiority cannot be made by the supporters of Israel as its very clear that we are dealing with a world full of moral relativism.
For some reason Israel seems to be able to conduct a policy of assassination of its enemies, shoot photographers and peace protesters and kill children and teenagers who can do nothing but throw stones at tanks who regularly bulldoze Palestinian houses without fear of international sanction and they seem to be right as they get away with it all the time. However they then try to claim the moral high ground when condemning the attacks carried out against them by Hamas or Hezbollah.
Yes the suicide bombings are awful and yes firing rockets indiscriminately into Israeli towns is not an action that can be condoned. However they are the acts of a tortured people thrashing out anyway they can in a David and Goliath story where they are the David and Israel is now Goliath. It takes a twisted sort of logic to not come to the conclusion that the terrorist attacks on the Israeli people are not linked to the treatment of the Palestinian people.
Therefore it seems that Israel will most likely ignore the wishes of the international community just like it has done on the numerous other occasions that the UN has passed resolutions against it.
We must also remember that the UN actually passed a resolution in 1975 that equated Zionism with Racism. This was also denounced by the Israeli prime minister at his recent speech in the UN and it seems that Israel only respects the wishes of the international community when it suits them and decries as anti-Semitism anything that tries to hold their illegal actions to account.
I will most likely be labelled unfairly as being an Anti-Semite just for posting this article but hopefully those of you that have the ability to think for themselves with see that logically there is no way to equate Zionism with Judaism and to criticise Zionism or the actions of the Israeli state is in no way an attack on the Jewish religion.
I personally believe that all religion is hocus pocus and that the world will be a better off place without it.
Hopefully the rest of the world will catch up with this form of thinking as soon as possible as I think the only way that the Israelis and the Palestinians can live together peacefully is if religion was taken out the equation and a secular nation state comprising of Palestine and Israel is created where peoples of all faith, colours and creed can live together in a democratic state.
Comments from the original site are posted below please add to them in the normal way
12 Responses
790 says
5
0
Rate This
Great article,
The more I read up on Israel and the history of deciet they are involved with it really makes me sick.
Creating the state of Israel is like moving back into a house that passed out of your families hands generations ago. The Palestinians would argue that the Jews moved out after the Jewish rebellion of AD 66-70 and destruction of the temple in Jerusalem by the Romans. The word Zionism is derived from the name of Queen Alexandra Slom-Zion whose Hasmonean dynasty ruled Palestine for only about 100 years after defeating the Greek Seleucids that is celebrated at Hannukah. The plan is to re-build a third temple in Jerusalem by 2066. The role of the Redeemer in Jewish culture was played out by the Rothschilds who bought tracts of land in Palestine and persuaded the British to concede a mandate for a Jewish Homeland. Some sources claim that the pogroms in Eastern Europe and Germany against the Jews was to create a refugee population to populate the new state of Israel. One rumour claims Hitler was Jewish and the illegitimate son of Salomon Rothschild by his maid in Vienna who married her uncle named Hisler. Nasi means Prince, and the head of the Zionist snake that is encircling Europe and America through economic means is willing to sacrifice the common herd for the greater goal of world domination through international Jewry. Wake up and smell the coffee!
What do you actually mean by “Wake up and smell what coffee?”
What is your actual point apart from a series of random “facts” or rumors and conspiracy theories about international Jewry?
Do you not realise you could become a Jew if you wanted to.
All you would have to do is convert to their religion or be born to a mother who is already Jewish. Remember it is a religion not a race which is why you can be against Israeli foreign policy and Zionism without being against Jews. This is the articles point – the 3 are not the same – Jew, Zionist and Israeli.
I could bore everyone about the Talmud, the history of the Jewish rebellion, the Church of Jerusalem which supposedly Jesus brother James the Just took over after his death and how the word messiah means anything but the “son of God”.
How the Christian religion like most others is also a bag of shite and based upon one mans belief of what he “wanted” Jesus to be – i.e Saul/Paul. A man who killed Christians before converting and even though he wasn’t around at the time or knew anybody who was created a religion out of his own ego, dreams and maybe insanity.
What about the 3 wise men who could be the Messiah who walk the planet at any one time – which many Jews believe in (are they all sons of God as well?) or did the Jews get the meaning of the word Messiah wrong when they created it and it was only then corrected once Saul/Paul decided it’s true meaning or how the Bible was a mash-up of books lying around at the time and anyone who disagreed was then declared a heretic.
But they are just all unrelated points like your comment.
So what is it you want to say?
Are you against Jews?
Are you Against Israeli foreign policy and it’s apartheid like laws, breaches of international law and continual spying on the USA as well as it’s targeted assassinations and killing of US citizens on the high seas in the Mavi Marmara and the USS Liberty?
Or are you against Zionism and it’s use of the Jewish religion to produce a climate of fear in it’s citizens so that they think the whole world is always out to exterminate them and therefore there must always be a place they can take refuge i.e Israel?
Or maybe you feel they have a racist ideology that makes a group of people believe they are “chosen” and above other Goyim / people though the use of ancient myths that are tajken as literal rather than allegorical? The same myths the Christian and Islamic religion base their religion on i.e the Torah?
Or are you just racist and believe white Christians should rule the world not Jews, blacks or Hispanics?
Or do you believe Israel is the rightful homeland of the Jews and that all Palestinians should be expelled?
Being anti-Semitic means being against Semites. The term “anti-Semitic” has been abused into a false meaning by those who are perhaps pro-Israeli and / or perhaps those who are somewhat ignorant. Here is the true definition (found in many dictionaries) of a Semite: Semite [ˈsiːmaɪt] less commonly, Shemiten
1. (Social Science / Peoples) a member of the group of Caucasoid peoples who speak a Semitic language, including the Jews and Arabs as well as the ancient Babylonians, Assyrians, and Phoenicians
So if one is really “anti-Semitic” then you are also against all Arabs and others. It would help to stop abusing this term and stop referring to this as uniquely a Jewish definition. Call a spade a spade and a Semite a Semite.
I agree with Jacques…a Semite is a resident of the Middle East. And, actually, if you remember that a HUGE percentage of Israelis are European and Slavic (Russian) origin, the only Semites in Israel are the PALESTINIANS!
Kaman folx. In ancient times, including Jesus’ time, the Arabian peninsula was considered part of what we now call Africa, not “the Near East” or “the Middle East”.
Abraham did not worship the God El the Moon God that is a Semitic Myth. Abraham was and his father and family were Sumerian priest who worhip Bel the Sun God called The god Utu, shepherd of the land, father of the black-headed” (Black et al. 17) in caanan it Baal and Asteroth or Isthar or Belita or Belit or Belili or Lilith the female version the Sun God Bel.Jews were originally black face Sumerians black Caucasians who loath by white Arab Semitic. At some point Jews were force to worship Moons Gods like El they did it willing and even the Semitic people appointed them in High positions in Moon worshipping priesthood like Enheduanna daughter of Jewish Sumerian Queen Tashlutum and Tashlutum mean being just lime Tishritu or Tistritum. Ashur is the Assyrian the the Sun God and started by Sargon Jewish wife Tashlutum from Ur Sumeria where Akitu started Sargon called the month Tashritum as his Jewish Sumerian wife Tashlutum a descend of Lilith or Belita in Ur. The Babylonians made Marduk the Moon god of Ur when the Semitic or Babylonians conquer Ur
Thus, in Babylonia, it started on the new moon closest to the spring equinox to honor the sky god Marduk; the Akitu nearest the fall equinox in Assyria honored the high god Ashur; and Akitus were held on both dates each Ben Shamesh (Hebrew, Jewish). The children or the “Sons of the Sun”. The term belongs to the period when the Jews were divided into moon and sun worshippers – Elites and Belites. (See “Bela- Shemesh”.)
“In Old Testament times, Nabonidus (555-539 BC), the last king of Babylon, built Tayma, Arabia as a center of Moon-god worship. Segall stated, “South Arabia’s stellar religion has always been dominated by the Moon-god in various variations.” Many scholars have also noticed that the Moon-god’s name “Sin” is a part of such Arabic words as “Sinai,” the “wilderness of Sin,” etc. When the popularity of the Moon-god waned elsewhere, the Arabs remained true to their conviction that the Moon-god was the greatest of all gods. While they worshipped 360 gods at the Kabah in Mecca, the Moon-god was the chief deity. Mecca was in fact built as a shrine for the Moon-god.
This is what made it the most sacred site of Arabian paganism. In 1944, G. Caton Thompson revealed in her book, The Tombs and Moon Temple of Hureidha, that she had uncovered a temple of the Moon-god in southern Arabia. The symbols of the crescent moon and no less than twenty-one inscriptions with the name Sin were found in this temple. An idol which may be the Moon-god himself was also discovered. This was later confirmed by other well-known archeologists. The evidence reveals that the temple of the Moon-god was active even in the Christian era. Evidence gathered from both North and South Arabia demonstrate that Moon-god worship was clearly active even in Muhammad’s day and was still the dominant cult. According to numerous inscriptions, while the name of the Moon-god was Sin, his title was al- ilah, i.e. “the deity,” meaning that he was the chief or high god among the gods. As Coon pointed out, “The god Il or Ilah was originally a phase of the Moon God.” The Moon-god was called al- ilah, i.e. the god, which was shortened to Allah in pre-Islamic times. The pagan Arabs even used Allah in the names they gave to their children. For example, both Muhammad’s father and uncle had Allah as part of their names . . .” In Mekka is Kaaba and Black stone. Kaab + Allah is Kabalah. Kabalah is sufism.
Abraham has 2 sons: Isaac -talmudism and Ishmael-islam. So in some point in the past semitic people, semitic is not nationality but linguistic group same as aryan linguitsic grop. Islam and judaism use Moon calendar based on phases ot the moon not the sun.
The worship of Aten, for example, in Ancient Egypt approximately 3500 years ago, is regarded as one of the first monotheistic religions. It was short lived, and fizzled out, on account of the 18th Dynasty Pharaoh Akhenaten’s obsession with demonstrative sacrifices of food, and insistance on having his people build a new city, resulting in starvation and ill health of his city. Whilst monotheistic, he elevated his and his wife’s status as near God-like, and the human representatives of Aten on earth. Having forced Eyptians to break with tradition and worship this particular deity, and caused huge suffering as part of his religious revolution, they tried to erase him from history after his death. It is claimed by some that Psalm 104: 20-30 is actually based on a poem by Akhenaten to Aten, a declaration of love for his God, but was appropriated by Christians and used in a Christian context. Wife of Akhenaten was Nefertiti. Their son was Tutankhamun. Akhenaten is connected with Moses and there is theory that it is the same person.
So what religion was practiced in Roman empire in Jesus era? Mithraism, Mythraic mystery with center figure Mithra the Sun god. Symbol of Mithra was Wheel of Mithra which loox like circled svastika, also arms of swastika made by horse heads, and on the wheel was Mithra with hand in crucifixion position. Mithraism was brought from Persia by Teutonic Legion of Rome. And becasue it was official religion in Persia, greatest enemy of Rome they turned name Mithra to Jesus-Yeshua. Try: Pagan origins of christianity, or Mithra Jesus similarities. So who the was Jesus?
He was a member of an Essene sect that was deeply into Gnostic philosophies. You know the Gnostics, they’re the guys the Inquisition was created to destroy. The Church created the word Heretic to define them. Gnostics believe every person is an extension of God, so Yeshua (You call him Jesus) calling himself the Son of God wasn’t unique among the crowd he associated with. That’s what Yeshua was into.
Hebrew -Jewish religion as we know it today started AFTER the time of Jesus, so it would be incorrect to call Jesus a Jew. And the ancient Canaan/ Hebrew/Israelite religion is no longer practiced, so nobody could join it anyway. In any case, Jesus was highly critical of many of the key religious practices of his time.
There was never any such thing as Judaeo Christianity as all of the books of the bible are by Jewish authors only! The present bible was trimmed down by the Gentiles (Constantine the Great & Eusebuis) in a bid to Hijack Jesus (Yeshua) from Judaism as anti-Jesus teachings are paramount throughout Christianity! The early Christian movement in Rome became ant-Semitic and removed all Jewish elements from the early church. ” It is a word connected to Katha, and the Cathars [Kathas] relatives of the Nazarene-Essene communities of healers at the time of Jesus, banished by the Romans after the time of the crucifixion.”
“There were Jewish Gnostics and Greek-Syrian Gnostics. The Pyrenean Cathars were related to the latter ones. They were Oriental Greeks and in its Indo-Greek nature, Catharism rejected Judaism, the Hebrew books, Moses’ violence, Jehovah’s thunder.”
Vatican pressed Christianity by brutality since begining:The persecution of pagans by the Christian Roman Empire began late in the reign of Constantine the Great, when he ordered the pillaging and the torning down of some temples. The first anti-Pagan laws by the Christian state started with Constantine’s son Constantius II,which was an unwavering opponent of paganism; he ordered the closing of all pagan temples, forbade Pagan sacrifices under pain of death,and removed the traditional Altar of Victory from the Senate.[6] Under his reign ordinary Christians started vandalizing many of the ancient Pagan temples, tombs and monuments. This also goes for the later medieval Emperor Charlemagne, who in September, 774, decided that the Saxons (Westfali, Ostfali, and Angrarii) must be presented with the alternative of baptism or death.[90] and is also reported as having 4,500 pagan Saxons beheaded in the Massacre of Verden. According to the historian Ramsay MacMullen a council of bishops at Toledo in 681 called on civil authorities to seize and behead all those guilty of non-Christian practices of whatever sort.
To understand past and present world political events, we need to understand this history. The kingdom of the Khazars may have vanished from the maps of today, but their affect and influence are still acutely felt. In thefist millennia A.D. a warlike, pagan tribe of people were driven westward, probably after series of defeats, from Central Asia (see Ancient Russia, by George Vernadsky).They settled in an area of what is now Southern Russia between the Black and Caspian Seas. This was an area just beyond the boundaries of both the Roman and Byzantine Empires. These people were called Khazars_ (or Chazars) r1a.org Throughout the centuries, this warring tribe became the most powerful in Asia. As early as 3 A.D. they were indentifiable in constant warfare in Persia and Armenia. They fought alongside Attila the Hun around 5 A.D. They were at the peak of power between the seventh and tenth centuries A.D.
The Khazars were strategically situated at the mouth of the Volga River, surrounded by the Caucasus mountains to the south, the Black Sea to the west, and the Khazar Sea (now Caspian Sea) to the east.Today rich on oil. They occupied a strategic key position in the vital gateway between the Seas where the great eastern powers of the period confronted each others.
Khazars were not only expert warriors, but aggressive merchants. At the peak of their power, they exacted a “tribute” (tax, extortion) of 10 percent from all traders, silk road, who had to pass through their dominion. This made them a wealthy, but despised nation. By the eighth century, their kingdom extended as far north as Kiev, Russia. At its peak, it encompassed one million square miles. for three of four centuries it was an untouchable empire. How many of you have ever heard of the Khazarian Empire?
In the eighth century (740 A.D.) something of _historic profoundness_ occurred in this kingdom. the Khazarian king (Kagan/Khan, Khakan or Chagan), having no religion for the kingdom beyond pagan phallic/idolatry worship, was getting pressure from the surrounding Christian Byzantine and Moslem empires to convert. According to the _Universal Jewish Encyclopedia_, the Khazar chieftain Bulan, “called representatives of Judaism, Christianity, and Mohammedism to expound their doctrines before him”. Not wanting to associate himself with either side, so as not to incur the wrath (hence, a potential alliance of war) against them, King Bulan _chose as the nations religion, Talmudism_, now known as JUDAISM (and formally known as Pharisaism).
Originally, the Khazars practiced traditional Turkic shamanism, focused on the sky god Tengri, but were heavily influenced by Confucian ideas imported from China, notably that of the Mandate of Heaven. The Ashina clan were considered to be the chosen of Tengri and the kaghan was the incarnation of the favor the sky-god bestowed on the Turks.
Worship of Tengri is sometimes referred to as Tengriism. The core beings in Tengriism are Sky-Father (Tengri/Tenger Etseg) and Mother Earth (Eje/Gazar Eej). It involved shamanism, animism, totemism and ancestor worship.
After the mass conversion of the King and his empire, none other than a so called or self styled Jew ,could occupy the Khazarian throne. The empire became a virtual theocracy with the religious leaders being the civil administrators as well. During this time the Talmud was added to or altered to protect their state religion from any other outside religious influence and to prevent a return to previous vile worship styles.
The ideologies of the Talmud became the axis of political, cultural, economic and social attitudes and activities throughout the Khazarian kingdom. The Talmud provided civil and religious law.
When the Khazars in the first century B.C. invaded eastern Europe their mother-tongue was an Asiatic language, referred to in the Jewish Encyclopedia as the “Khazar languages”. they were primitive Asiatic dialects without any written alphabet or any written form. When King Bulan was converted in the 7th century he decreed that the Hebrew characters that he saw in the Talmud and other Hebrew documents was thereupon to become the alphabet for the Khazar language. the Hebrew characters were adopted to the phonics of the spoken Khazar language. The Khazars adopted the characters in order to provide a means for a written record of their speech.
The present day language of the Khazars is known as “Yiddish”. The Khazars adapted words to their requirements from the German, the Baltic and Slavonic languages.
The Khazars adopted a great number of words from the German language. The Germans had a much more advanced civilization than their neighbors the Khazars so the Khazars sent their children to German schools and higher learning institutions. The “Yiddish” is not a German dialect. Many are led to believe that “Yiddish” must be German since it shares so much with the German language. The Khazars must have spoken some language when they invaded Eastern Europe. What was the language that the Khazars spoke for over a thousand years? When did they discard it? How did an entire population discard one language for another all of a sudden?
“Yiddish” must not be confused with “Hebrew” because they both use the same characters as their alphabets. There is not one word of “Yiddish” in ancient “Hebrew” nor is there one word of ancient “Hebrew” in “Yiddish”. It was now a state religion. (“Facts are Facts”, by Benjamin Freedman, Jewish author and historian in a letter to Dr. David Goldstein). By the tenth century the ruler of Christian Russia, Vladimir III had conquered the Khazarian empire. but this is not the end of the story. In fact, it is only the beginning. The Khazars took the Hebrew characters they say in the Babylonian Talmud and applied them to the phonetics of the German, Russian,Turkish and other dialects around them. This hybrid language was known as _Yiddish_. Even with the disbandment of the Khazars, their language of Yiddish survived and still today forms a common bond between the people. Actually there is no word of ancient hebrew in yiddish. As you can see, the Khazars were _NOT_ and are not the Biblica lHebrew Judaists, but _claimed_ to be so as time went on. In some point Khazarian aristocracy moved west, out of Pale Setlement to Spain, Hungary, Germany. From spain we have khazars: Loyola-jesuits, alumbrado-iluminati, del Banco-Warburg family. From Hungary: Soros, Sarkozy, Bela Kun who killed russian tsar in bolshevik revolution. In 18. century Khazar elite concentrated in Frankfurt, Germany. Frankfurt at the time was the headquarters of the Jesuit, Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminatti, as well as Rothschild Brothers’ financial empire. This is worth repeating: Frankfurt was the birthplace of both the Illuminatti and the Rothschild empire. When Jacob Frank entered the city, the alliance between the two had already begun. Weishaupt provided the conspiratorial resources of the Jesuit Order, while the Rothschilds contributed the money. What was missing was a means to spread the agenda of the Illuminatti and that the Frankists added with their network of agents throughout the Christian and Islamic worlds. Rothschild ( biblical Ruth’s Child) shared house with Warburg,Weishaupt-Iluminati formerly alumbrado, Jacob Frank, Jacob Schiff. They created strategy to make alliances and get back former territory between Caspian and Black sea. First come French Revolution. Jacobin Iunius Frey aka Moses Dobrushka was Jacob Frank’s follower. And then they send financed Napoleon on his trip to Russia.
After they been expeled from Spain by inquisition and reconquista Khazars settled in Thessaloniki, Turkey and founded sect Donmeh.
In 18. century khazars from west organized rebelions in Pale Setlement against russian ruller. They also extend WW1 by 3 years to feed German military thru Belgium relief found by Britain and USA until Bolshevik revolution was done by commando comming from USA , Trotsky and 300 others, with 20 milion in gold from Jacob Frank. And then started murder Russians. It was not communist ideology it was revenge. In 1901 Stalin worked for Rotschild at his refinery in Batumi. Jacob Schiff helped Japan with war with Russia in 1904 which follow revolution 1905 after which Stalin was send to Siberia. After Lenin’s death Trostky supposed to be in charge in Russia, but Stalin kicked him of. So they founded build up German military what leads to WW2. Strategy of NATO is encircled Russia, Afghanistan,Iraq, and so on and prepare for final fight between Gog and Magog. Khazaria versus Russia.
And who are those biblical canaanite/hebrews? Palestinians. Israeli Historian: Palestinians Are Biological Descendants of Bible’s Jews: As for Palestine,
Schlomo Sand suggests that the Palestinians are the people we call “the Jews”
in the Bible: Apartfrom enslaved prisoners, the population of continued to live on their lands, even after the destruction of the second temple [in 70 AD]. Some converted to Christianity in the 4th century,while the majority embraced Islam during the 7th century Arab conquest. http://mondoweiss.net/2008/09/israeli-historian-palestinians-are-biological-descendants-of-bibles-jews.html
Antisemitism is mostly conected with nazi era in germany. Story is, again, little bit diferent. After WW1 Germans had been angry on aristocracy that pilled ’em into war. So they created rebelion: German revolution 1919, and also see Bavarian Soviet Republic. It ended 700 years bavarian aristocratic rullers but they also kill some members of Thule society and Teutonic Knights Rite. Symbol of Thule became swastika and The Black Sun, Schwarze Sonne. Thule society and Order of Teutonic Nights was created by aristocracy and high end class-rich. Main figures was baron Rudolf von Sebbotendorf and his associates met head of Templars from Italy in Vienna. There was Maria Orsic as well, she latter created Vril society. He told em something what lead Sebottendorf travel to Tibet. It is said, that there was original scroll from bible where Jesus mentioned Teutons as choosen nation. There is a story that son of Cleopatra and Iulius Ceasar- Caesarion went to India and that he was Jesus. Other story tells that Christianity was created as honor of Iulius Caesar since pope holds title: Pontius Maximus. Whatever it was, it created tibetian colony in germany. As I mention befor: In Mekka is Kaaba and Black Stone. Black stone in german is Schwarze Stein= SS. Inside SS was elite group called Schwarze Stein.
Khodorovsky(Khazar) business name was Blackstone Enterprises.
The Myths of Untersberg
It is mysterious and legendary: The Untersberg – called “sleeping dragon” by the Dalai Lama.
On a 1992 visit to Austria, the Dalai Lama specifically asked to see the Mountain, calling it “a sleeping Dragon” and “The Heartchakra of the World” (chakra refers to an energy center in eastern terminology).
But this was not the first world-famous person to know of the mountain. Hitler was obsessed with it, hoping to gain access to supernatural beings and power to turn a war that he was loosing. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread384938/pg1
The myths tell about time portals, lost persons and wondrous mountain dwellers like dwarfs. According to a legend, these dwarfs digged out the more than 400 caves in the Untersberg. But this is only one of many speculations about the mountain.
It is rumored, that emperor Karl the Great (similar is claimed about Friedrich Barbarossa) sleeps in the mountain in a subterrainian throne room together with his truthful knights and dwarfs for more than a thousand years. He´ll awake to the last battle between Good an Evil, when his beard has grown around his marmor table 3 times and the ravens don´t fly around the mountain peaks anymore.
Untersberg is in Bergtesgaden region wher Hitler has house with view on Untersberg.
The greatest flourishing of the Celts, around the middle of the first millenium BC, is known as Hallstadt culture. While the mines and settlements of the Celts around Hallstatt are impressive, they do not really compare in size and scope with those of the Salzburg-Berchtesgaden area. It is interesting that a number of early proto-Celtic settlements, coming at the transition from the Stone Age to the Metal Age, seem to be oriented toward the Untersberg. So there is a suggestion that the Untersberg may have had religious importance as far back as the Neolithic Age. Such sites include the Rainberg, Hellbrunn, and Zill. http://www.untersberg.org
Friedrich Barbarossa was famous Teutonic ruller. And WW2 aginst Russia was promoted as war between Good and Evil, Stalin or commies. Hitler was brought into power by Warburgs,Rotschilds,Schiffs end so on. See Sutton: Wall street and the rise of Hitler. There is a speculation, that Hitler was Rotschild’s offspring, since his mother worked for Rotschild ine Vienna and became pregnant.
Were Germans prepared for biblical fight between Gog and Magog orchestrated by Khazars? “Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog,the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him.” Ezekiel 38:2 http://steveinvista.wordpress.com/gog-and-magog/
Some expositors believe that the references to “Rosh, Meshech and Tubal” in Ezekiel 38 refers to Russia, Moscow and Tobolsk, two of Russia’s major cities. http://www.lasthour.com/GOG-MAGOG.htm
Julius Caesar claimed the two titles of Imperator and Pontifex Maximus that meant emperor and high priest that was a union of church and state authority in one person. These powers were later separated and the Church took the title of Pontifex Maximus for the Pope in Rome. Caesar was assassinated by Marcus Brutus who became Imperator in 44BC on Caesar’s death because Caesar intended to make Caesarion his heir while Brutus was another of his illegitimate sons. The idea that Caesarion survived and was the historical Jesus is unlikely, as Jesus claimed the title of Basileus Judaean or King of the Jews, a title that Caesarion was unlikely to claim when he was already Pharoah of Egypt and in succession to become Emperor and high priest of Rome while Judaea was to become a Roman Province after the fall of the Hasmonean dynasty, first governed by Antipater, the father of Herod the Great.
The more I read up on Israel and the history of deciet they are involved with it really makes me sick.
1. (Social Science / Peoples) a member of the group of Caucasoid peoples who speak a Semitic language, including the Jews and Arabs as well as the ancient Babylonians, Assyrians, and Phoenicians
Abraham did not worship the God El the Moon God that is a Semitic Myth. Abraham was and his father and family were Sumerian priest who worhip Bel the Sun God called The god Utu, shepherd of the land, father of the black-headed” (Black et al. 17) in caanan it Baal and Asteroth or Isthar or Belita or Belit or Belili or Lilith the female version the Sun God Bel.Jews were originally black face Sumerians black Caucasians who loath by white Arab Semitic. At some point Jews were force to worship Moons Gods like El they did it willing and even the Semitic people appointed them in High positions in Moon worshipping priesthood like Enheduanna daughter of Jewish Sumerian Queen Tashlutum and Tashlutum mean being just lime Tishritu or Tistritum. Ashur is the Assyrian the the Sun God and started by Sargon Jewish wife Tashlutum from Ur Sumeria where Akitu started Sargon called the month Tashritum as his Jewish Sumerian wife Tashlutum a descend of Lilith or Belita in Ur. The Babylonians made Marduk the Moon god of Ur when the Semitic or Babylonians conquer Ur
Thus, in Babylonia, it started on the new moon closest to the spring equinox to honor the sky god Marduk; the Akitu nearest the fall equinox in Assyria honored the high god Ashur; and Akitus were held on both dates each Ben Shamesh (Hebrew, Jewish). The children or the “Sons of the Sun”. The term belongs to the period when the Jews were divided into moon and sun worshippers – Elites and Belites. (See “Bela- Shemesh”.)
“In Old Testament times, Nabonidus (555-539 BC), the last king of Babylon, built Tayma, Arabia as a center of Moon-god worship. Segall stated, “South Arabia’s stellar religion has always been dominated by the Moon-god in various variations.” Many scholars have also noticed that the Moon-god’s name “Sin” is a part of such Arabic words as “Sinai,” the “wilderness of Sin,” etc. When the popularity of the Moon-god waned elsewhere, the Arabs remained true to their conviction that the Moon-god was the greatest of all gods. While they worshipped 360 gods at the Kabah in Mecca, the Moon-god was the chief deity. Mecca was in fact built as a shrine for the Moon-god.
Abraham has 2 sons: Isaac -talmudism and Ishmael-islam. So in some point in the past semitic people, semitic is not nationality but linguistic group same as aryan linguitsic grop. Islam and judaism use Moon calendar based on phases ot the moon not the sun.
The worship of Aten, for example, in Ancient Egypt approximately 3500 years ago, is regarded as one of the first monotheistic religions. It was short lived, and fizzled out, on account of the 18th Dynasty Pharaoh Akhenaten’s obsession with demonstrative sacrifices of food, and insistance on having his people build a new city, resulting in starvation and ill health of his city. Whilst monotheistic, he elevated his and his wife’s status as near God-like, and the human representatives of Aten on earth. Having forced Eyptians to break with tradition and worship this particular deity, and caused huge suffering as part of his religious revolution, they tried to erase him from history after his death. It is claimed by some that Psalm 104: 20-30 is actually based on a poem by Akhenaten to Aten, a declaration of love for his God, but was appropriated by Christians and used in a Christian context. Wife of Akhenaten was Nefertiti. Their son was Tutankhamun. Akhenaten is connected with Moses and there is theory that it is the same person.
So what religion was practiced in Roman empire in Jesus era? Mithraism, Mythraic mystery with center figure Mithra the Sun god. Symbol of Mithra was Wheel of Mithra which loox like circled svastika, also arms of swastika made by horse heads, and on the wheel was Mithra with hand in crucifixion position. Mithraism was brought from Persia by Teutonic Legion of Rome. And becasue it was official religion in Persia, greatest enemy of Rome they turned name Mithra to Jesus-Yeshua. Try: Pagan origins of christianity, or Mithra Jesus similarities. So who the was Jesus?
He was a member of an Essene sect that was deeply into Gnostic philosophies. You know the Gnostics, they’re the guys the Inquisition was created to destroy. The Church created the word Heretic to define them. Gnostics believe every person is an extension of God, so Yeshua (You call him Jesus) calling himself the Son of God wasn’t unique among the crowd he associated with. That’s what Yeshua was into.
Hebrew -Jewish religion as we know it today started AFTER the time of Jesus, so it would be incorrect to call Jesus a Jew. And the ancient Canaan/ Hebrew/Israelite religion is no longer practiced, so nobody could join it anyway. In any case, Jesus was highly critical of many of the key religious practices of his time.
There was never any such thing as Judaeo Christianity as all of the books of the bible are by Jewish authors only! The present bible was trimmed down by the Gentiles (Constantine the Great & Eusebuis) in a bid to Hijack Jesus (Yeshua) from Judaism as anti-Jesus teachings are paramount throughout Christianity! The early Christian movement in Rome became ant-Semitic and removed all Jewish elements from the early church. ” It is a word connected to Katha, and the Cathars [Kathas] relatives of the Nazarene-Essene communities of healers at the time of Jesus, banished by the Romans after the time of the crucifixion.”
“There were Jewish Gnostics and Greek-Syrian Gnostics. The Pyrenean Cathars were related to the latter ones. They were Oriental Greeks and in its Indo-Greek nature, Catharism rejected Judaism, the Hebrew books, Moses’ violence, Jehovah’s thunder.”
Vatican pressed Christianity by brutality since begining:The persecution of pagans by the Christian Roman Empire began late in the reign of Constantine the Great, when he ordered the pillaging and the torning down of some temples. The first anti-Pagan laws by the Christian state started with Constantine’s son Constantius II,which was an unwavering opponent of paganism; he ordered the closing of all pagan temples, forbade Pagan sacrifices under pain of death,and removed the traditional Altar of Victory from the Senate.[6] Under his reign ordinary Christians started vandalizing many of the ancient Pagan temples, tombs and monuments. This also goes for the later medieval Emperor Charlemagne, who in September, 774, decided that the Saxons (Westfali, Ostfali, and Angrarii) must be presented with the alternative of baptism or death.[90] and is also reported as having 4,500 pagan Saxons beheaded in the Massacre of Verden. According to the historian Ramsay MacMullen a council of bishops at Toledo in 681 called on civil authorities to seize and behead all those guilty of non-Christian practices of whatever sort.
The Khazars were strategically situated at the mouth of the Volga River, surrounded by the Caucasus mountains to the south, the Black Sea to the west, and the Khazar Sea (now Caspian Sea) to the east.Today rich on oil. They occupied a strategic key position in the vital gateway between the Seas where the great eastern powers of the period confronted each others.
Khazars were not only expert warriors, but aggressive merchants. At the peak of their power, they exacted a “tribute” (tax, extortion) of 10 percent from all traders, silk road, who had to pass through their dominion. This made them a wealthy, but despised nation. By the eighth century, their kingdom extended as far north as Kiev, Russia. At its peak, it encompassed one million square miles. for three of four centuries it was an untouchable empire. How many of you have ever heard of the Khazarian Empire?
In the eighth century (740 A.D.) something of _historic profoundness_ occurred in this kingdom. the Khazarian king (Kagan/Khan, Khakan or Chagan), having no religion for the kingdom beyond pagan phallic/idolatry worship, was getting pressure from the surrounding Christian Byzantine and Moslem empires to convert. According to the _Universal Jewish Encyclopedia_, the Khazar chieftain Bulan, “called representatives of Judaism, Christianity, and Mohammedism to expound their doctrines before him”. Not wanting to associate himself with either side, so as not to incur the wrath (hence, a potential alliance of war) against them, King Bulan _chose as the nations religion, Talmudism_, now known as JUDAISM (and formally known as Pharisaism).
Originally, the Khazars practiced traditional Turkic shamanism, focused on the sky god Tengri, but were heavily influenced by Confucian ideas imported from China, notably that of the Mandate of Heaven. The Ashina clan were considered to be the chosen of Tengri and the kaghan was the incarnation of the favor the sky-god bestowed on the Turks.
Worship of Tengri is sometimes referred to as Tengriism. The core beings in Tengriism are Sky-Father (Tengri/Tenger Etseg) and Mother Earth (Eje/Gazar Eej). It involved shamanism, animism, totemism and ancestor worship.
After the mass conversion of the King and his empire, none other than a so called or self styled Jew ,could occupy the Khazarian throne. The empire became a virtual theocracy with the religious leaders being the civil administrators as well. During this time the Talmud was added to or altered to protect their state religion from any other outside religious influence and to prevent a return to previous vile worship styles.
When the Khazars in the first century B.C. invaded eastern Europe their mother-tongue was an Asiatic language, referred to in the Jewish Encyclopedia as the “Khazar languages”. they were primitive Asiatic dialects without any written alphabet or any written form. When King Bulan was converted in the 7th century he decreed that the Hebrew characters that he saw in the Talmud and other Hebrew documents was thereupon to become the alphabet for the Khazar language. the Hebrew characters were adopted to the phonics of the spoken Khazar language. The Khazars adopted the characters in order to provide a means for a written record of their speech.
The present day language of the Khazars is known as “Yiddish”. The Khazars adapted words to their requirements from the German, the Baltic and Slavonic languages.
The Khazars adopted a great number of words from the German language. The Germans had a much more advanced civilization than their neighbors the Khazars so the Khazars sent their children to German schools and higher learning institutions. The “Yiddish” is not a German dialect. Many are led to believe that “Yiddish” must be German since it shares so much with the German language. The Khazars must have spoken some language when they invaded Eastern Europe. What was the language that the Khazars spoke for over a thousand years? When did they discard it? How did an entire population discard one language for another all of a sudden?
“Yiddish” must not be confused with “Hebrew” because they both use the same characters as their alphabets. There is not one word of “Yiddish” in ancient “Hebrew” nor is there one word of ancient “Hebrew” in “Yiddish”. It was now a state religion. (“Facts are Facts”, by Benjamin Freedman, Jewish author and historian in a letter to Dr. David Goldstein). By the tenth century the ruler of Christian Russia, Vladimir III had conquered the Khazarian empire. but this is not the end of the story. In fact, it is only the beginning. The Khazars took the Hebrew characters they say in the Babylonian Talmud and applied them to the phonetics of the German, Russian,Turkish and other dialects around them. This hybrid language was known as _Yiddish_. Even with the disbandment of the Khazars, their language of Yiddish survived and still today forms a common bond between the people. Actually there is no word of ancient hebrew in yiddish. As you can see, the Khazars were _NOT_ and are not the Biblica lHebrew Judaists, but _claimed_ to be so as time went on. In some point Khazarian aristocracy moved west, out of Pale Setlement to Spain, Hungary, Germany. From spain we have khazars: Loyola-jesuits, alumbrado-iluminati, del Banco-Warburg family. From Hungary: Soros, Sarkozy, Bela Kun who killed russian tsar in bolshevik revolution. In 18. century Khazar elite concentrated in Frankfurt, Germany. Frankfurt at the time was the headquarters of the Jesuit, Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminatti, as well as Rothschild Brothers’ financial empire. This is worth repeating: Frankfurt was the birthplace of both the Illuminatti and the Rothschild empire. When Jacob Frank entered the city, the alliance between the two had already begun. Weishaupt provided the conspiratorial resources of the Jesuit Order, while the Rothschilds contributed the money. What was missing was a means to spread the agenda of the Illuminatti and that the Frankists added with their network of agents throughout the Christian and Islamic worlds. Rothschild ( biblical Ruth’s Child) shared house with Warburg,Weishaupt-Iluminati formerly alumbrado, Jacob Frank, Jacob Schiff. They created strategy to make alliances and get back former territory between Caspian and Black sea. First come French Revolution. Jacobin Iunius Frey aka Moses Dobrushka was Jacob Frank’s follower. And then they send financed Napoleon on his trip to Russia.
After they been expeled from Spain by inquisition and reconquista Khazars settled in Thessaloniki, Turkey and founded sect Donmeh.
In 18. century khazars from west organized rebelions in Pale Setlement against russian ruller. They also extend WW1 by 3 years to feed German military thru Belgium relief found by Britain and USA until Bolshevik revolution was done by commando comming from USA , Trotsky and 300 others, with 20 milion in gold from Jacob Frank. And then started murder Russians. It was not communist ideology it was revenge. In 1901 Stalin worked for Rotschild at his refinery in Batumi. Jacob Schiff helped Japan with war with Russia in 1904 which follow revolution 1905 after which Stalin was send to Siberia. After Lenin’s death Trostky supposed to be in charge in Russia, but Stalin kicked him of. So they founded build up German military what leads to WW2. Strategy of NATO is encircled Russia, Afghanistan,Iraq, and so on and prepare for final fight between Gog and Magog. Khazaria versus Russia.
And who are those biblical canaanite/hebrews? Palestinians. Israeli Historian: Palestinians Are Biological Descendants of Bible’s Jews: As for Palestine,
Schlomo Sand suggests that the Palestinians are the people we call “the Jews”
in the Bible: Apartfrom enslaved prisoners, the population of continued to live on their lands, even after the destruction of the second temple [in 70 AD]. Some converted to Christianity in the 4th century,while the majority embraced Islam during the 7th century Arab conquest.
http://mondoweiss.net/2008/09/israeli-historian-palestinians-are-biological-descendants-of-bibles-jews.html
Khodorovsky(Khazar) business name was Blackstone Enterprises.
The Myths of Untersberg
It is mysterious and legendary: The Untersberg – called “sleeping dragon” by the Dalai Lama.
On a 1992 visit to Austria, the Dalai Lama specifically asked to see the Mountain, calling it “a sleeping Dragon” and “The Heartchakra of the World” (chakra refers to an energy center in eastern terminology).
But this was not the first world-famous person to know of the mountain. Hitler was obsessed with it, hoping to gain access to supernatural beings and power to turn a war that he was loosing.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread384938/pg1
The myths tell about time portals, lost persons and wondrous mountain dwellers like dwarfs. According to a legend, these dwarfs digged out the more than 400 caves in the Untersberg. But this is only one of many speculations about the mountain.
It is rumored, that emperor Karl the Great (similar is claimed about Friedrich Barbarossa) sleeps in the mountain in a subterrainian throne room together with his truthful knights and dwarfs for more than a thousand years. He´ll awake to the last battle between Good an Evil, when his beard has grown around his marmor table 3 times and the ravens don´t fly around the mountain peaks anymore.
Untersberg is in Bergtesgaden region wher Hitler has house with view on Untersberg.
The greatest flourishing of the Celts, around the middle of the first millenium BC, is known as Hallstadt culture. While the mines and settlements of the Celts around Hallstatt are impressive, they do not really compare in size and scope with those of the Salzburg-Berchtesgaden area. It is interesting that a number of early proto-Celtic settlements, coming at the transition from the Stone Age to the Metal Age, seem to be oriented toward the Untersberg. So there is a suggestion that the Untersberg may have had religious importance as far back as the Neolithic Age. Such sites include the Rainberg, Hellbrunn, and Zill.
http://www.untersberg.org
Friedrich Barbarossa was famous Teutonic ruller. And WW2 aginst Russia was promoted as war between Good and Evil, Stalin or commies. Hitler was brought into power by Warburgs,Rotschilds,Schiffs end so on. See Sutton: Wall street and the rise of Hitler. There is a speculation, that Hitler was Rotschild’s offspring, since his mother worked for Rotschild ine Vienna and became pregnant.
Were Germans prepared for biblical fight between Gog and Magog orchestrated by Khazars? “Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog,the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him.” Ezekiel 38:2
http://steveinvista.wordpress.com/gog-and-magog/
Some expositors believe that the references to “Rosh, Meshech and Tubal” in Ezekiel 38 refers to Russia, Moscow and Tobolsk, two of Russia’s major cities.
http://www.lasthour.com/GOG-MAGOG.htm