Israel is a terrorist state. Do the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?

Israel is a terrorist state but do the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?

By Dark Politricks

I am re-posting this article from a couple of years ago as the circumstances of Israel attacking Gaza and Hamas launching attacks on Israel is again repeating itself yet again. It is a cycle that has continued since Hamas was born, or rather created by Israeli intelligence to split the Palestinians into two warring factions, as Fatah / PLO were the dominant political force before Hamas, and although Hamas control Gaza after an election years ago, Fatah continue to reign in the West Bank, although a corrupt and weak state if it could even be called one.

I am against all terrorism, and I think Hamas's attack on 7th October 2023 went too far killing innocent people when they should have just concentrated on their enemy, the IDF. How they were able to cross into Israel so easily with so many men and weapons and carry out their massacre is a question the war mongering evil Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, needs to pay a price for allowing Israel to be caught asleep, and allow Hamas to attack so easily.

However when Israel talks about terrorism, and terrorist attacks they forget how the country was formed. Israel was created through terrorism, with Israeli terrorist groups killing first British soldiers and then massacring Palestinians and forcing them to flee from their homes.

The "plan" this time, in response to Hamas's attack, was for Israel to ethnically cleanse Gaza, forcing all 2 million Palestinians into refugee camps in Egypt. Egypt knows this and this is why they are preventing any Palestinians escaping through their Rafa route into Gaza. Israel doesn't want a two state solution, the growth of illegal settlers proves this as they are making it impossible for a viable Palestinian state to be born. 

The only true solution is a secular Israel with Palestinians and Jews living side by side. However the fervently racist Jews who honestly believe in their magic book, and that they lived in Israel thousands of years ago being God's chosen people, need re-education and some lessons on logic if this is to work. Either these racists need to be removed somewhere away from the Arabs they currently harass on a daily basis, chanting racist songs, mocking the deaths of Mohammed and Jesus, spitting at passers by and even throwing rubbish and bottles of urine onto their market stalls from stolen Palestinian homes above, or some two state system needs to be concocted to prevent these racists attacking Palestinians. 

These Jewish supremacists need to be removed to the north of Israel if one state will work, as its these super racist Jews who hate Christians and Muslims that are filling the current Knesset Government and always call for extermination of Palestinians, want the whole land to themselves and have no thought about launching a war that kills thousands of children.

Anyway here is the article - Israel was born out of terrorism, to claim they are now being threatened by it is hypocritical, Israel IS a terrorist state.

.........

As Israel carries on it's "defence" of it's people by blowing up news organisation buildings and stealing any photos that could contain incriminating images, as well as force people out of their family homes to give over to Israeli's with no chance to take all their belongings I have to ask - why does no-one ever ask the US President who always says "Israel has a right to defend itself" whether the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?

Surely a people under illegal occupation, in which they have been deserted by all their old Arab friends now in bed with Israel and the US, have a right to defend themselves from being annihilated whenever there is an election due or Bibi Netanyahu is about to appear in court?

This is the sentiment of the illegal settlers now taking more Palestians homes, and creating "facts on the ground" to prevent a viable 2 state solution. They see Palestinians as snakes as one Knesset member, Ayelet Shaked once called them.

What these racists don't realise is that the tide is turning against their evil barbaric torture of a whole people. More people in New York, once a staunch pro-Israei ally, is now seeing New Yorkers protest in favour of the Palestinians despite the biased news they recieve from CNN, FOX and MSNBC. Even politicians who are usually all sucking on the teat of AIPAC money have stood up in Congress and in public to defend the Palestinians, something unheard of during the wars against GAZA in the eary 21st century.

They have created so many "facts on the ground" that a two state solution is almost now impossible. So because the rest of the world with a conscience won't let Israel destroy a whole people despite the US giving them a blank cheque to basically do so, therefore there will be only one solution left in the end. A one state, non Jewish, non Islamic, secular state from the sea to the river that both people's will have to learn to live in.

Rashida Tlaib, a Palestinian-American representative of Michigan, also delivered a tearful address to Congress. Speaking of the atrocities that Palestinians face, she questioned the US government’s “unconditional support” of Israel. Recalling how police shot rubber bullets and gas at protestors in Ferguson, Bush said she learned then that “the same equipment that they [the police] used to brutalize us is the same equipment we send to the Israeli military to police and brutalize Palestinians”.

Bernie Sanders called on the Biden administration and fellow lawmakers to “no longer be apologists for the right-wing Netanyahu government and its undemocratic and racist behavior”.

If the United States is going to be a credible voice on human rights on the global stage, we must uphold international standards of human rights consistently, even when it’s politically difficult. We must recognize that Palestinian rights matter. Palestinian lives matter. This comes after an expected weak position taken by Biden in which he said that "Israel has a right to defend itself" - what about Palestinians? 

Do they not also have a right, even a duty seeing they are imprisoned by a country igorning international law, to fight back against their plight?

Remember Israel was born out of terrorism, Israeli terrorism, massacres of Palestinians, and before that, the British Soliders that controlled the Palestinian Mandate.

The smouldering ashes of the King David Hotel blown up by Israeli terrorists in the 40's

So when the Israeli's were "building" their nation by using terrorism to "create facts on the ground" in the late 40's by massacring the Palestinians and forcing them from their homes, the world still stood back and did nothing. There were a few measly wars defeated by the US armed Israeli military from ex Palestinan allies such as Eygpt, Syria and Jordan who have now fallen by the wayside.

This of course caused more massacres, heads chopped off and of course the famous bombing of the King David Hotel, pictured above, which was the British HQ in Palestine at the time. Multiple Presidents and Prime Ministers can find their roots in the terror gangs that pushed the British out of Palestine and let them go on a murderous rampage.

There used to be a video on here by Blackstone Intelligence covering this matter but obviously it has now been taken down. However if been reading my site you will know I have had many historical documents on here related to the, breaches of International law such as the illegal piracy of the Mavi Marmara in international waters where a US citizen was shot 9 times in the back, caught on camera, but hardly mentioned in the US news as it would "embaress an ally".

The same sort of logic that President Johnson used when Israel tried a false flag attack on the USS Liberty, flying US flags, and overhearing their massacres of Eygptians, Johnson almost nuked Eygpt because he believed the lie that it was that country that had attacked the ship. Survivors and Israeli pilots overheard on radio telling their commanders that the ship was American told a different story altogether. Twice planes sent by nearby US ships were ordered back by Defence Secretery McNamara that could have helped the struggling ship.

I have a very famous talk by the ex Zionist turned Christian, and therefore anti-semite or self hating Jew,  Benjamin Freedman, who gave a very famous speech that put a very different spin on the reasons for WW1 and WWII. You can read the transcript and listen to it here.

We should also all know by now that the Rothschilds control most things related to money, pulling their puppets in parliaments and state houses all over the world. They also run most of the central banks in the world where they can print money on worthless paper, lend it to the government, and our taxes go to paying back these usury loans.

However there modus operandi has always been to make money from war. They lend loans to both sides and then collect reparations from the loser and the payback from the winner.

Israel and Zionism is a Rothschild operation, created between the British who were fighting the Ottoman Empire in WWI and Germany who was winning the World War 1. Germany offered to call the war off with no reparations, lets just all go home and forget about it, and they were the side winning. It was a no lose situation for the soldiers, but not for the bankers.

The Rothschild's didn't like this as it meant no money from reparations and they went to the British Government and promised them that they could get the USA into the war and win it. However in return they wanted some form of document that gave them Israel.

The famous Balfour agreement was a document sent to Lord Rothschild that promised to create a land for Zionist Jews if they brought the Americans into the war and in 3 months after the German offer to call the war off there was a total turn around in the USA who wanted to stay out of European wars. Most of the American press actually supported the Germans .

A false flag attack on the British ship the Lusitania, which was carrying Americans to Liverpool from New York orchestrated by the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, got the Americans so riled up they wanted revenge and joined in on the war and beat the Germans.

When the Jews started flocking into Palestine they committed mass murders, massacres and drove hundreds of thousands of Palestinians out of their homes.

The rules of war say that refugees must be able to return to their homes but Israel, who had lost about 250,000 - 500,000 people in concentration camps, became the NAZI's who had persecuted them. Killing and murdering British and Palestinians until the Brits left and Israel was created. They are like the sex offender who was abused themselves as a kid, just passing on the condition down their lineage..

Israel seems to forget that International law was created due to their treatment by the NAZI's in WWII. However since the treaties signed in the 40's Israel has been run like a terrorist state, massacring refugees in camps like Sabra and Shatila in Lebanon which ex Israeli PM Ariel Sharon as defence Minister at the time was found responsible for.

However this was far from the only time Israel has committed war crimes and breached international law always with the US protectinng them from world comdemnation by vetoing any security council resolution that comes to a UN vote. The most recent vote was blocked the other day, the Council drafted a statement calling for a ceasefire, but the statement was vetoed by the US. You can watch the actual debate here.

Of course this all goes back to 19th century Rothschild Zionism which has used the Jewish people as a tool to get their way in the Middle East. Don't you find it funny that you can debate any historical fact but the only one that is not in dispute is that 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust ("Burnt Offering" - in Hebrew). 

This is a fact that cannot be argued about, and doing so would get you jailed in most European countries. You can't say only 5 1/2 million died it must be is a perfect 6 million Jews that died. Was the Holocaust an offering to their God to allow their self fullfilling prophecy to succeed in getting the Jews back to Israel?

Remember the quotes during the war, when Germany offered to sent Hungarian Jews to Israel instead of the work/death camps.

"One Cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland"

"When they asked me, couldn’t you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said, ‘NO!’ and I say again ‘NO!’ … one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance."

Yitzhak Gruenbaum

After the creation of the Israeli state, the Stern Gang and Irgun Israeli terrorists, who killed so many Palestinians, British, American and other nationalities in their fight for independence all became members of the IDF. 

So the IDF is the Jewish army and it's based on terrorists. In fact the first leader of Israel was the head of a terrorist group and there have been 3 Presidents or Prime Ministers who were in these terrorist gangs. I wonder if that is the reason the IDF is so callous and acts like it does?

There is too much too go into this subject without being called a racist, anti-semite or have Hasbara and BOT haters in the comment section.

However history is history and it repeats itself over and over.

Remember you can be a Jew and not Israeli or Zionist and you can be a Zionist and not a Jew or an Israeli Zionist atheist.

The politicians call for the mothers to be killed so that they can't spawn any more Palestinian "snakes" and the racist language in the Knesset is appalling.

Remember if you agree Israel is a terrorist state, causing false flag attacks to blame on Muslims like 9.11 or the USS Liberty or the Lavon Affair where they bombed Brits and Americans in Eygpt to blame on Muslims then you have to be scared that they have nukes, especially when you read the Samson Option.

This was a policy of aiming nukes at Russia and Europe in case they were overrun by Muslims so they could take the whole world down with them, terrorists or rational players in a dangerous area of the world terrorising the Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese?

They commit assassinations overseas, killing innocent Iranian scientists just in case they were working on a nuclear bomb, kill peaceful protesters on the Mavi Marmara in international waters like pirates, threaten the world with nuclear annihilation, and they have had many, many massacres of the Gazan people who have just had their only lifeline of food cut off by the terrorist state.

Please comment carefully, I have nothing against non racist Israeli's and deplore terrorism whether it comes from Gaza or Tel Aviv, I just want a peaceful end to this sore on our international conscience. Just please do not call me an anti-Semite, which is the usual tactic to discredit someone attacking Israeli foreign policy, as I have nothing against Jews, just the Zionist State Of Israel when it breaks international law and does not keep it's part in treaties signed by both parties.

By Dark Politricks

© 2021 Dark Politricks

Who Benefited From Blowing Up Nord Stream1 and Nord Stream2?

Who Caused A Massive Natural Disaster By Blowing Up Russian Gas Lines

By Dark Politricks

Update: October 30th 2022:

It seems that the UK has been found out as the country who helped blow up the pipe lines. Apparently using Israeli Pegasus malware, Russia bugged Liz Truss's iPhone and saw her text Sec of State Antony Blinken a minute after the attack saying "It's done", the Russians have directly accused the UK of blowing up the German and Russian gas pipelines, and despite investigations by Sweden who won't comment on grounds of "National Security" and Germany, who has forbidden their MP's from asking questions about it.

It seems we were the culprits of a massive terrorist plot that will put Germany into recession and may cause hundreds of thousands of people to die from the cold this and the following winters.

George Galloway on the subject:

How do the Russians know that the UK blew up the North Stream pipelines in partnership with the US?

Because @trussliz used her iPhone to send a message to @SecBlinken saying “It’s done” a minute after the pipeline blew up and before anybody else knew?

iCloud admin access rocks!

— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) October 30, 2022

 

Update: October 10th 2022:

At the beginning of October, Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to resume gas supplies to Europe through the intact part of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.

"The ball is in the EU's court. If they want to, then the taps can be turned on and that's it," he said in a speech at an energy forum in Moscow.

Germany, however, said it would not take Russian gas via the Nord Stream 2 pipeline that has become a flashpoint in the Ukraine crisis.

Asked if Berlin would rule out the use of Nord Stream 2, German government spokeswoman Christiane Hoffmann said, "Yes."

More info > https://www.dw.com/en/putin-offers-europe-gas-through-nord-stream-2-germany-declines/a-63416138 

I had an argument with a friend today over who blew up the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines the other day. I tried explaining to him Russia wouldn't destroy a pipeline they spent billions on when they could just turn it off with a switch at Gazprom HQ.

However, like most people he believed the western propaganda that the Russians did it, although he thought Ukraine might despite not having the technical know-how.

When I tried telling him it was most likely the Americans he said no, why would they, what do they have to gain plus the funniest line, "the BBC would have said about it in the news" (as well as ITV and Sky), that's like asking for CNN to do a 60 minute hit piece "sponsored by Phizer" on the Opioid epidemic they were fined $2.3bn for criminal and civil allegations that the company illegally promoted uses of four of its drugs. 

The USA Planned War in Europe and the Energy Crisis

Despite denials, a Swedish news agency revealed a document signed RAND Corporation, a think tank linked to the US Department of Defense, outlines a strategy for “Weakening Germany and strengthening the U.S.” It says there is an “urgent need” for an influx of resources from outside to maintain the American economy, “especially the banking system”. A key objective is to destroy the cooperation between Germany and Russia which is seen as the greatest economic and political threat to the United States. 

Their plan was to draw both Russia and Europe into war with the primary goal of destroying the German economy. The green parties in Europe were manipulated by American strategists and were part of the trap. The benefits of US-based companies having less competition on the world market, logistical advantages, and the outflow of capital from Europe. The US economy would benefit by $7 to $9 trillion dollars. You can read the document here and you can see how US exports of gas have gone up this year to Europe as Russian gas is stopped. 

You can see how US gas exports to the EU from the USA below and how they have increased as the year, war and suicidal sanctions on Russia have increased.

And here you can see which European countries relied on Russian gas for power, heat, and industry below.

To be honest, as a UK citizen who apparently doesn't get any gas from Russia, as we have North Sea oil and pipes from Norway, I am wondering why our energy bills are rising so fast unless it's price gouging by energy companies, many who have reported record profits this year. If that is the case then there should be a windfall tax on those companies to help pay for the increased price rise in energy or legal action against those companies to prevent unnecessary rises from even occurring.

Of course, this also fits with the Davos World Economic Forum plan to proceed with the Great Reset, get us off fossil fuels, replace boilers at home with useless and more expensive water heaters, constant surveillance, digital currency, and the banning of cash the use of a Social Credit system, instant fines coming from bank accounts, work from home, less driving or flying abroad - unless it's onboard your own private jet to Davos of course.

The main thrust of the forum is global control. Free markets and individual choice do not stand as the top values, but state interventionism and collectivism. Individual liberty and private property are to disappear from this planet by 2030, and who can forget their famous slogan that "We will own nothing, and he happy".

Ecosystem Damage By Destruction of Nord Stream pipelines

Despite the pipes being turned off on the German side, they were full of gas and the explosions caused massive leaks of Methane into the water creating a massive unnatural disaster for the ecosystem where the popes were based.

So who caused these explosions? Of course, western fingers pointed at Russia and Russia pointed at the US who had 2 ships seen near the site of the explosions only hours before they occurred. I am pretty sure that if Germany sent divers down into the mess in the sea and collected scraps from the explosive device or torpedo used that they would find English writing on US weapons. Would they keep quiet and let the US carry on destroying their economy and freezing their population or would they dare speak out and cause a rift within NATO?

Recent leaks of a Rand Corporation document, which Rand denies, show that the USA has had a long-term plan going back to the early 2000's to wean the EU off Russian gas as well as wanting to de-Industrialise the powerhouse of Europe, Germany, by getting it involved in a war with Russia and having them cut their gas off.

Why Would The USA Attack Their Major EU Allies Infrastructure and Cause Economic Chaos?

USA world dominance is a “primacy,” aim which drives Washington, however, this is not possible without control of Eurasia and that’s not possible without control of Ukraine by pushing Russia out and controlling the governments in Moscow and Beijing and it now seems Europe as well. What U.S. leaders still view as Russia’s “imperial ambitions” are in Moscow seen as imperative defensive measures against an aggressive West.

For the USA to want to cause major pain, and probably thousands of deaths this winter by destroying their major trading partner, the EU, by making them cold and powerless during winter is a sick idea for a supposed ally to do to us, but it's not unexpected, they have been talking about it since Condoleezza Rice was State Secretary. 

Plus here| we have Joe Biden talking about how if Russia invaded Ukraine the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline would not go ahead as he had ways to stop the pipeline. 

Pres. Biden: "If Russia invades...then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it."

Reporter: "But how will you do that, exactly, since...the project is in Germany's control?"

Biden: "I promise you, we will be able to do that." https://t.co/uruQ4F4zM9 pic.twitter.com/4ksDaaU0YC

— ABC News (@ABC) Feb

This is a plan they have played out since the US coup in Ukraine in 2014 and the civil war in which over 16,000 people of the Donbass region of Ukraine, many parts who have just voted to join Mother Russia were killed by Neo-NAZI thugs and thugs from prisons such as murderers and rapists, who were let out to help booster the Ukrainian foreign legion. 

It has also been conjectured  that show US soldiers invading ground in the north, as well as English and US "mercenaries" who were executed on the orders of Putin, by Russia's Spetznas Special Forces after being caught laying British explosives in mines from southern Russia to the Ukrainian city of Kharkion, including the famous ex SAS soldier and writer Andy McNab. 

There were also the trials and death sentences passed down to ex British soldiers Aiden Aslin, 28 and 48-year-old Shaun Pinner. There has also been the suspected capture of an ex Canadian General who is thought to be currently held in Moscow. He was thought to have been captured in the Azovstal steel works trying to escape, and it is the supposed reason NATO sent in helicopters to try and rescue him with no luck.

"If Russia invades...then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." 

Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson said that the leaks were likely caused by “a deliberate action” but “not an attack against Sweden.” Other Western countries and NATO have echoed that conclusion.

German, Danish, and Scandinavian security authorities are now examining the leaks and trying to identify their cause, according to the German Economy Minister Robert Habeck, who added that Europe can protect its critical infrastructure.

Tucker Carlson -Why Russia Would Not Lose Its Leverage Over Europe By Destroying Pipelines

So what has really happened by these explosions, probably caused by the USA?

Here is a quick list:

• An environmental disaster that will contribute to climate change due to methane gas leaks.
• The stoppage of any possibility Germany will be able to keep the lights on and citizens heated during a cold winter.
• An economic attack by the USA on its NATO allies and major trading countries just to preserve US hegemony.
• The stopping of leverage Russia has over Europe by being able to stop and start the flow of gas at any time. 
• The destruction of billions worth of expensive time and money building a pipeline and the possible collapsing of Germany from a major world exporter to a farming nation as it was just after WW1 & WW2. Let's hope there is no move to the right by all the angry Germans as we all know where that leads if a populist leader comes along and recognises the American duplicity and lies they have been told over the years.
• Huge power bill increases if replacement power cannot be found quickly and imported into the EU.
• The possible deaths of thousands of people across Europe especially if it is going to be a very cold winter. I would call this genocide as depending on how many poor, old, and homeless people die it is justified for Germany to want at least compensation, maybe even revenge if they fall out of line with the USA and especially if the EU collapses.

Putting the Pieces Together - Redacted

Please watch this segment of Redacted which talks about the attacks on the pipelines. It is shown on YouTube at 9pm GMT, 4pm EST every day if you want to join the thousands now watching one of the biggest independent shows which has bigger viewing figures than many MSM news programmes.

So if any of you have any other theories of how this attack happened then please let me know in the comment section.

By Dark Politricks

© 2022 Dark Politricks

The Stupidity Of Russian Sanctions

A Look At How The War In Ukraine Will Hurt Us As Much As Russia

By Dark Politricks

As the war in Ukraine continues, the rampant xenophobia against ordinary Russians, many of who are against the war continues unabated.

The sanctions against Russia have got to the silly stage. They were supposed to hurt Putin and his Oligarch Billionaire friends, and some have. However ordinary Russians are being attacked, and legally so on social media, as Facebook and Instagram changed their Terms of Service to allow violent and negative language against Russians, something usually banned by their sites.

Meta Platforms will allow Facebook and Instagram users in some countries to call for violence against Russians and Russian soldiers in the context of the Ukraine invasion, according to internal emails seen by Reuters on Thursday, in a temporary change to its hate speech policy.

Russian people and even Russian animals have been sanctioned. In response to the war in Ukraine, the International Cat Federation has banned all cats from Russia, and Russian breeds, from competing in international competitions.

 

Also, anti-war Russians such as the Russian piano prodigy, Alexander Malofeev, 20, who was supposed to play three shows with the Orchestre Symphonique de Montréal (OSM), has been dropped after people emailed to complain despite him being outspoken against the war in Ukraine.

 

This is getting ridiculous and despite numerous videos online from ex-US military members, talking about the lack of Russian moral, and how Ukraine will win the war, the facts on the ground are pretty clear. Either the Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, egged on by the US War Hawks in the State Department, fights to the death and destruction of his country, or he settles terms with the Russians in talks that have been ongoing throughout the war.

The sad thing is that the terms he will most likely have to accept will be the same terms that the Russians, were asking for before they invaded, and all this misery and outpouring of Ukrainian refugees into Europe could have been stopped before it started.

This is clearly the US and other NATO country's fault, for giving him false hope that they would back him up, allow entry into the EU and NATO, and supply him with weapons and intelligence throughout the war.  

It seems though that the Pentagon, unlike the State Department, is a bit wiser, and stupid ideas which could expand the war such as bringing Polish MIG fighters into Ukraine and then re-supplying Poland with new planes, were a clear red line that Putin said would be an act of war and that any weapons or troops supplied by the West would be fair game.

With Russian Nuclear Arms on the equivalent of DEFCOM 2, 1 step away from a full nuclear attack, the Pentagon seems to agree with commentators that anything suggesting western help to Ukraine could expand the war, and make it global, even terminal for this planet.

This video is from the Duran, a channel that always goes into details that other videos miss. Earlier today they had a 1.5hr video on the round of peace talks being held by Russia and it included a journalist embedded in Ukraine, in the middle of what the Russian army calls a cauldron. This is where they slowly turn up the heat, once they have surrounded their enemy, and from the following video it seems they are doing just that in Mariupol.

;

Russians have been using diplomacy at the same time as attacks in Ukraine, as they try to set up humanitarian corridors with the UN to let Ukrainian citizens, and hopefully, soldiers, slip away from the fight. They have no reason to bomb or shell these corridors as it gives the Ukrainians brilliant propaganda pictures of innocent civilians, being killed. 

Plus, according to some experts, they did this in Syria to good effect. They are not trying to own the skies with their modern fighter planes, albeit with fewer flying hours than US or NATO pilots. 

The history and reasons for this war are discussed in the following talk from a Christian speaker who discusses the history of the region now in conflict and the real reasons for the war.

They do not want to destroy the country like the US/NATO does in their wars with weeks, and sometimes months of aerial bombardment by missiles and planes dropping bombs before the troops go in, and then big money is given over to MIC companies like Halliburton to rebuild the country they just destroyed as in Iraq.

No, it seems that although some of the Russian conscript soldiers who have been paraded in front of camera's breaking Geneva conventions, providing great anti-Putin / war images from injured soldiers who say they were lied to about their invasion, haven't eaten properly, and do not want to fight Ukrainians just protecting their land that in fact Russia is going to win this war.

One other thing this rash of sanctions against Russia, which has pushed them closer to China and India, even offering to sell India cheap gas in Rupees in a sign that those countries who stick with Russia, like China, Brazil, and India, will be rewarded whilst those who have thrown every sanction in the book at them will be severely punished, such as the 200% increase in the price of Russian gas Europeans will have to pay whilst frantically trying to make other arrangements for imported energy.

It seems the USA has played Ukraine well, not only to get Europe out of Russia's sphere of influence and reliance on their gas, so that they can sell us theirs. Closing Nordstream2, and the threat of Nordstream1 as well was also ideally an outcome the US wanted from this conflict they started back in the Maidan coup. Even the existing multiple pipes that deliver gas through Ukraine to Europe could be turned off or even destroyed during the war.

At the moment US President Biden is going around the world begging to countries such as Venezuela, who only recently the US tried to overthrow their President, Nicolás Maduro in a failed coup, for cheap oil and gas to replace the loss of Russian imports, and to sell to Europe which is already suffering stupidly high inflation at the gas pump due to the sanctions.

We seem to be cutting our nose off to spite our face, as we pay £1.70+ per litre at the petrol station ($10.06 per gallon), and set to be over £2 by the end of the summer. I remember when petrol first went over £1 per litre, I was about 21 and couldn't believe it, however it has bounced between £1.20-£1.40 for the last 15+ years but has seen only a dramatic increase recently.

As well as petrol price which might help push a move to electric cars, we are already suffering high and constantly increasing energy costs to heat our homes and put the TV on. My bill already doubled at the end of last year and the company I am with was talking about doubling it again only the other month and that was before the war in Ukraine had even started.

I can only dread the bills coming in once the price of food rockets due to the increasing price of fuel for delivery drivers, plus Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine control over 30% of the wheat and fertilizer exports,, which will also drive up inflation into stupid numbers.

If we don't offer Putin some sort of "off-ramp", in which these sanctions can be reversed in return for peace, then almost half the world's population in China, India, and the far East with Russia, will be swapping US treasury bonds and dumping the dollar, whilst creating an alternative to the SWIFT banking system which will have the benefit of not being controlled by the whims of US feelings towards one countries actions.

President Biden is supposedly going hat in hand to Saudi Arabia to ask the head of the OPEC cartel to increase output and therefore reduce the price of oil globally. However, The Crown Prince, MBS, does not like Biden at all, and has not been picking up his calls since Biden's election pledges to hold Saudi Arabia to account for their war in Yemen, and murder of the US journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, as well as stopping arms sales.  

Joe Biden has been constantly rebuffed by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in his attempts to persuade them to produce more oil in the wake of a US ban on Russian imports. The Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and the UAE’s Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan both declined requests to speak to the US president in recent weeks, and after declining to speak to Biden, Mohammed bin Salman took a call from President Putin. 

 

It looks like we might be more affected by our sanctions on Russia than anyone expected and in "Realpolitik" we really should not be picking dictators to sanction, and others to beg for cheap oil from. 

If you really think Putin is Hitler, as some US MSM commentators have said, then what is MBS who, in the largest known mass execution in the kingdom’s modern history just executed 81 people for crimes ranging from killings to belonging to militant groups. 

Can we really say that Putin is as bad as MBS, and the state of Saudi Arabia which is definitely, bombing Yemen into rubble, unlike Russia with Ukraine which in comparison has been quite restrained? 

The hypocrisy of this hunt for oil from dictators to replenish supplies from a supposedly democratically, although authoritarian elected Russian President, stands out like a black eye. Are we really going to delve into the degrees of despotism and discuss why it is that some wars are reported more than others? 

News commentary on the war by the US media, such as MSNBC's Joy Reid who faced massive backlash for accusing the media of covering the war in Ukraine with more compassion because the victims are "white and largely Christian" has shown how the western media are blatantly putting this crisis in Ukraine above the many others occurring in the world at the moment, many of which are of the USA's making.

Along with the censorship and de-platforming of independent reporters like Abby Martin, who just had 300 videos from Breaking The Set, an ex Russia Today show, in which she actually decried the Russian invasion of Crimea when it happened, it has become clear that some wars are just more important than others. 

No-one was sanctioned when the US illegally invaded Iraq, and the last major war in Europe was NATO's bombing of Serbia which led to the breakaway narco-state of Kosovo. However as it was the US doing the killing, it was somehow acceptable to invade a sovereign country, whereas reporters like Abby Martin in her Empire Files show, often talk about the often ignored and over-looked global conflicts and anti-imperialism wherever it comes from. 

It has got to the stage where white extremism is all the news offers as conflicts and humanitarian disasters, in Yemen, Palestine, Syria, and Afghanistan are ignored because somehow European conflicts are considered more important. 

The Arab and Middle Eastern Journalists Association even sent out a statement on Sunday condemning:

“the racist implications that any population or country is ‘uncivilized’ or bears economic factors that make it worthy of conflict. This type of commentary reflects the pervasive mentality in Western journalism of normalizing tragedy in parts of the world such as the Middle East, Africa, South Asia, and Latin America. It dehumanizes and renders their experience with war as somehow normal and expected."

Fair comment, and with the mass coverage of the Ukrainian crisis on western news shows, with other points of view labelled as Russian dis-info, or reporting on the history of the conflict and hypocrisy of the world ignoring NATO and US aggression as "Whataboutism", it is clear that without doing some major digging about on the web to find proper #ALTNEWS you are only going to get the side of the war the US and Europe want to project.

With the hypocrisy of this conflict clearly visible for all to see who want to, we must be willing to offer Russia and Putin a way to come to peace with Ukraine, and a way back to normality by rolling back extensive and stupid sanctions that will only hurt us as Russia pivots towards India and China, otherwise we will be the ones suffering most from the sanctions NOT Russia! 

By Dark Politricks

© 2022 Dark Politricks  

Russia Recognises Breakaway Ukrainian Republics

Putin Sends Russian Troops Into Ukraine As "Peacekeepers"

By Dark Politricks

Late on Monday night 21st February 2022, Russia's leader Vladimir Putin, after pressure from both the heads of the breakaway Ukrainian Republics, and the Russian parliament, recognised the two breakaway Republics in Eastern Ukraine, Donetsk, and Luhansk, as independent sovereign nations, saying that it was an act that was overdue.

The leaders of the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, Denis Pushilin and Leonid Pasechnik, had both asked Russian President Vladimir Putin to recognize the republics’ independence from Ukraine.

"On behalf of all of the people of the DPR, we are asking you to recognize the Donetsk People’s Republic as an independent, democratic and social state based on the rule of law," Denis Pushilin said.

Leonid Pasechnik added: "With the goal of preventing mass deaths among the republic’s civilian population, some 300,000 of whom are Russian citizens, I’m asking you to recognize the sovereignty and independence of the Lugansk People’s Republic."

Both leaders also suggested signing a treaty on friendship and cooperation with Russia, which included military cooperation.

This came as the 8-year civil war in Eastern Ukraine between the breakaway Republics and Western Ukrainians continued with heavy shelling along the contact line between Ukrainian soldiers and Russia-backed separatists, whilst thousands of people were being evacuated from eastern Ukraine to Russia, some of whom had apparently been paid $130 worth of Rubles to do so.

The shelling occurred despite the massive build-up of around 150,000 Russian soldiers along the border, and with warnings from NATO, the USA, and the EU, about heavy sanctions and dire consequences if they dared to invade Ukraine. 

The civil war has seen over 14,000 people killed and many atrocities committed by both sides. This has included the downing of the Malaysia MH17 flight, which saw 283 people killed including 80 children, and 15 crew members, and the burning down of the Odessa Trade Unions Building, where at least 36 separatists were burned to death by far-right nationalists. 

Frequent heavy shelling by the western forces and far-right militias have seen many towns in the breakaway republics reduced to rubble, with schools and even kindergartens struck by rockets, sometimes deliberately, such as this one in the settlement of Stanytsia Luhanska.

Speaking as part of a televised address to the nation on Monday evening, the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, signed the decree recognising the republics as independent states. He said that:

“I deem it necessary to make a decision that should have been made a long time ago to immediately recognize the Donetsk (DPR) and Lugansk (LPR) People’s Republics.” 

This came in a speech he gave in which he listed multiple reasons why the republics in the Donbass region of Ukraine should gain independence. These are the regions that have been fighting a war with the far-right Ukrainian government forces, that the USA helped install in the Maidan coup, during 2014.

Putin spoke about the regime now in control of Ukraine in which he slammed them for "extreme nationalism", "Nazism" and "Russophobia" pointing to the shutting down of Russian-language news outlets and laws he said that discriminated against Russian speakers in Ukraine..

The head of state also alleged that Kiev is sending saboteurs to target Russian infrastructure and attempting to "drag foreign states into conflict with our country". He also said that Ukraine's ambitions to join NATO would mean an "immediate threat of attack against our country." 

This decision was met with massive celebrations across the Donbass region of Ukraine with firework displays and Russian flag waving which you can watch on this link.

This comes after a period in which Russia had been trying to negotiate security terms with NATO over their constant expansion despite being a Cold War alliance, which both Russia and China have noted, is a war that is long over. Russia wanted assurances that NATO would deny membership to Ukraine and any other former Soviet countries, as well as to roll back the alliance's military deployments in Central and Eastern Europe.

This was not something NATO agreed to, and it set off the latest in a long line of developments which saw a massive build-up of Russian forces on the border of Ukraine, western nations removing diplomats and warning citizens to leave the country, and then yesterday the events that led to the UN Security Council meeting held late Monday night.

The day started off with news from Russia that FSB agents had stopped and killed five members of a Ukrainian sabotage group by FSB border guard forces for attempting to illegally cross the Russian border. This was either a ruse by NATO to goad Russia into attacking Ukraine, or the "false flag" attack that the US/UK Axis of War had been talking about for weeks. Either way, it has seemed to create the excuse that Russia has used for its actions.

Earlier in the day Putin reportedly told his security council it was "necessary to consider an appeal from the leaders of two breakaway regions in eastern Ukraine for Russia to recognize them as independent.", Putin had called the situation in Eastern Ukraine where fighting continues, a genocide and he considered the people of Ukraine part of Russia's heart and soul.  

"I would like to reiterate that Ukraine is just not our neighboring country. It’s an integral part of our history, culture, and spiritual space...they are comrades, dear ones, not just colleagues, not just those who used to serve in the army but also relatives. Those who tied up with us in family and blood ties."

He went on to criticize the US-led coup that has started this whole situation on his border: "Those who seized the power and keep the power in Kiev we demand to stop hostilities immediately. Otherwise, all responsibility for the possible continuation of the bloodbath will be on the consciences of the regime that is ruling in Kiev."

These were Putin's words as he later signed a historical document to recognise the two breakaway regions as independent statelets, defying western warnings that such a step would be illegal and kill off long-running peace negotiations. 

You can watch Putin signing the documents below. 

⚡️⚡️Putin signs historic decree on recognizing two Donbass republics in the presence of their heads pic.twitter.com/FKaphoS3zZ

— RT (@RT_com) February 21, 2022

While the treaties of friendship and cooperation between Russia and the newly recognized republics of Donetsk and Lugansk are still in the draft stage, the Russian State Duma still released the proposed documents on Monday, showing that they will include common defense against external aggression and the right to use each other’s military infrastructure, among other things.

However after the treaties were signed, Putin ordered the Russian military to “secure the peace” in the newly recognized Donetsk and Lugansk republics, and Russian troops started pouring into the regions.

Now we don't know what is going to happen next apart from a few things but I do hope the West, especially here in Europe where we are facing, rising heating costs doesn't do something stupid like stopping the Nordstream2 pipeline that has been built to bring extra and much-needed gas to Germany and Europe, without going through Ukraine. 

Their existing pipeline that runs through the country has been a constant source of grief between the two countries as Russia has constantly complained that Ukraine is not only stealing gas but owes them money for gas they have not paid for. 

Russia cut off the gas for a few days back in 2006 and 2009, after Russia accused Ukraine of diverting £14.5 million worth of gas intended for other European countries, and we ALL felt it. We do not want that to happen again.

Gazprom, Russia's state energy group, cut natural gas deliveries to Ukraine on 1st January 2009 after a long dispute over unpaid bills and prices for this year's supplies, and their chief spokesman, Sergei Kupriyanov, said Kiev is now threatening deliveries. 

"The Ukrainian side has openly admitted that it is stealing gas, and it is not even ashamed of this fact."

Last year, gas delivered to Europe through Ukrainian pipelines fell by 25% and fears of further disruptions have ramped up with the buildup of Russian troops near the Ukrainian border.

However, if Europe does not want Russia's gas, China certainly does and they have already signed a 30-year contract for Russia to supply China natural gas and will use euros instead of US Dollars for payment.

I think Russia would only be too happy to start delivering gas we could have had to China instead. Due to their close relationship and recent cutting down of transactions in US dollars from 90% to 51% in 2019, any financial sanctions put on Russia for this move will probably be negated by the fact that the world still needs their gas. 

Not only does the US buy Russian gas and oil (12-26 million barrels per month in 2021), as well as Europe, but as retaliation to any sanctions, Russia could also close their airspace to Western planes, quit the International Space Station, and decrease their use of the dollar for financial transactions even more.

The BRICS grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa have already announced that the new BRICS New Development Bank will move away from using US dollars in loans, and will introduce the BRICSPay system to allow nationals of their countries to make payments in their own currencies to also avoid the US dollar.

So why is Russia doing this?

Well if anybody remembers recent history it was the US-led coup in Ukraine that removed a Russian-friendly corrupt leader only to replace him with a Western-friendly corrupt leader during the Maidan uprising that ignited recent troubles. 

The west helped to install a far-right government in Ukraine during 2014 and Ukraine's desire to leave the Russian sphere of influence, instead wanting to join both NATO and the EU, kicked the ball down the hill that has led to this point in time.

Anyone who knows World War II history doesn't need reminding that many Ukrainians, celebrated the German invasion of the USSR during Operation Barbarossa, and even joined up to fight the Soviets during their invasion into the USSR. Therefore the Russians rightly fear being invaded once more from Ukraine, and especially fear far-right NAZI's who killed 40 million+ men, women, and children during World War II.

The recent Ukrainian coup in 2014 was led by Victoria Nuland, US President Barack Obama's agent at least during the month of February when it climaxed. She was famously caught on a call saying "Fuck the EU", who were hoping for a democratic and less corrupt future government for Ukraine. 

Instead, Nuland instructed America's Ambassador in Ukraine, Jeffrey Pyatt to choose the rabidly anti-Russian, and far-right, Arseniy Yatsenyuk as the new President to run the now clearly fascist country on Russia's border. 

As you can see from this picture of some far-right Ukrainian soldiers during the coup who are openly proud of their NAZISM, they were only too happy to go off to the more Russian east to fight and kill the citizens that lived there.

Now to understand why Russia is so pissed off with NATO expansion and a future where Ukraine was a member of NATO, and why the US keeps pushing for NATO expansion, we need to go back to 1989 when the fall of the Berlin Wall occurred and then the fall of the Soviet Union.

Although many people have heard the broken promise of the then US Secretary of State James Baker who gave an assurance to Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not expand “not one inch eastward” during a meeting on February 9, 1990. Many have not realised who else gave the Soviets the same promise so that they would roll out of Eastern Europe.

Declassified documents now reveal that Gorbachev only accepted German reunification, which the Soviet Union had a legal right to veto under treaty from not only James Baker but also President George H.W. Bush, West German foreign minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher, West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, the CIA Director Robert Gates, French President Francois Mitterrand, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, British foreign minister Douglas Hurd, British Prime Minister John Major, and NATO secretary-general Manfred Woerner. 

So, one can imagine how angry the Russians must be with the current situation, having NATO bases all around them, with so many Western leaders breaking that promise not to expand, and facing the threat of Ukraine, the ex-Soviet Republic, joining NATO and having nuclear weapons on their border facing directly at them.

One must ask the obvious question. Why is it that the US thinks that it is so "exceptional", that it can impose its will through International bodies, banks, and its military on other countries?

It invades them under false pretences, with fake claims of "spreading democracy", or "Human Rights Abuses", and to those, it cannot invade, it imposes sanctions. Why does the US feel such a moral superiority when in fact they have spent the last 100+ years installing Right-Wing dictators and overthrowing left-wing governments all over the globe, and causing millions of deaths and executions from their US-trained death squads at the School of the Americas?

The USA would certainly not appreciate being surrounded by Russian or Chinese bases and having nuclear missiles faced at them as seen by the Cuba crisis in the '60s. However, they expect other countries that they constantly use as scapegoats for election losses, hack attempts, and Human Rights abuses to suffer the same indignation. 

When only weeks ago Russia said that it was considering deploying troops in Venezuela and Cuba amid growing U.S.-Russia tensions over Ukraine, the US went almost ballistic. U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan told reporters that the United States would respond "decisively" if Russia were to actually send troops to those countries.

So it seems what is good for the goose is not good for the gander, and only the US and its NATO allies have the right to security, without worrying about countries they consider enemies, having troops, and possibly nuclear weapons near their own borders.

When you consider that Russia has been invaded 3 times from the west in the last 200+ years from Napolean, to World War 1 and 2, with the last invasion being NAZI's, with Ukrainian help, you can only realise why it is so important for Russia to feel secure in their borders and not have NATO pointing guns at them from their front door.

If Russia cannot get basic security guarantees from the west, and as history shows the only words they hear about NATO have been lies about not moving eastwards. Then you can only come to the conclusion that their latest actions of bringing troops into the newly independent statelets as peacekeepers, make perfect sense for them, whatever the cost that the US and its allies impose on them for them doing so.

Whether cool heads are used in this situation or hot-headed ones I can only hope for the former but fully expect the latter from recent western media reporting on the situation.

However, with Russia and China having such a close relationship, I would not be surprised if China also recognises these statelets at the UN meeting that has been called for by Ukraine, the United States, and six other countries. This meeting is currently being held, as the US and its allies talk about cutting Russia off from the US-controlled Swift International Banking system. 

However, the SWIFT banking system, as earlier noted, is something that Russia and China have been using less and less lately, as well as the petrodollar. They have decided instead to conduct transactions in their own currencies rather than allow the US to export its inflation across the globe as it prints trillions of dollars and increases its debt to points that cannot ever be paid off.

We can only wait and see what the response from the US and NATO is, and then the response Russia replies with. When it comes to playing strategic chess, I think Putin would easily beat Biden, and he would have considered all these potential sanctions and threats before he made his move earlier yesterday. 

You can read this article from last year in which Russia states that it is ready to be cut off from SWIFT, so I guess that they already have an alternative if that is part of the US response to Putin's actions. I only hope that it doesn't come at a too high cost for us in Europe as I am pretty sure the US doesn't care whether we spend the winter freezing if Russia cuts off our gas in retaliation. So I really hope they have a backup plan to keep Europe warm if Nord Stream 2 is not operational.

Update - Oct 1st 2022

The Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines have both been blown up causing a massive environmental disaster due to being full of gas. Of course, stupid fingers pointed at Russia who could have easily turned the taps off at Gazprom HQ but US ships were seen in the local area carrying out underwater exercises, and apparently, they wanted to de-industrialise their biggest partner in Europe, Germany, and stop their reliance on cheap Russian gas that made them a competitor to the US. 

Plus it removed any Russian leverage over the EU who may have wanted to not have thousands of people freeze to death this winter by turning the taps back on as many protests have been occurring in Germany by angry citizens all demanding to turn Nord Stream 2 on so that businesses wouldn't close, rolling blackouts would not occur and people who were going into the woods to chop down trees for old fashioned wood burning fires could stop.

By Dark Politricks

© 2022 Dark Politricks

Everything is about Money

Money Rules Everything - Have A Different Perspective

By Dark Politricks

As the world goes crazy, and we hear about the rich DAVOS crowd, telling us to stay indoors, work from home, don't drive or go on holiday, and now, all to save the environment. We should all be thinking about why they are really telling us this and continuing to extend the lockdowns.

This Orwellian state is something they have used COVID19 as a cover for getting us ready and compliant for ages. It all comes down to money, the money of the rich and the tiny percentage left for the rest of the world. Whatever the Global Reset's fluffy words try to cover, there will be no rebalancing of capital from those who currently have it and those who don't. 

Normal people may end up worse off for those in Africa to gain a little, but you won't see Bill Gates becoming an average Middle Class income spender, or Jeff Bezos giving away his billions to end hunger in the 3rd world. 

When you think about it, it is pretty sick to hear these billionaires who could easily put their money together, combined enough to end world poverty, and probably give decent free health care to the unfortunate places who don't yet have it, such as some poor African countries or the USA..

Therefore I thought I would share this poem I saw about money from the famous British poet Benjamin Zephaniah. It's worth a listen, especially in these times.

People all over Europe and the world are starting to see through the ruse, and unwilling to be test subjects for long vaccine trials. 

You can see from this Tweet how people in Germany are fighting back against the Police State that has been built up around us during our lockdown. 

People are not taking lockdown measures too lightly in Germany. https://t.co/KioRWxYIiD

— DarkPolitricks (@darkpolitricks) March 15, 2021

Now they are saying we should continue the lockdown for Climate Change. This was the main reason for all this, and now it is coming clear to many, when the super rich start telling us to stay home. All whilst they fly around on private jets, deciding undemocratically, what is in our best interests.

Using the stick of Climate Change as a threat, and the carrot of a UBI, they warn that Climate Change is going to bring about more pandemics and therefore lockdowns if the governments of the world treat them as they have done with COVID19.

Meet the Press host Chuck Todd during an interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci floated the idea that “it is inevitable” the world will face more viruses “due to climate change.”

“When you think about sadly having to prepare for this again, and I know there's a lot of folks who think that, due to climate change and due to the globalization in general, it is inevitable that we’ll deal with more and more viruses like this. The biggest lesson you are going to take away to prepare for the next one,” Todd said during an interview Sunday morning.

In the USA, the people were told in March to lock down for 15 days to “flatten the curve”. Bill Gates (who is not a doctor and was not elected or appointed by any government) later said that the world cannot go fully back to normal until most people get his rushed RNA vaccine.

That was a year ago. Most people around the world are still living under some sort of emergency powers due to the pandemic that seems like a Police State to any normal thinking person. The laws enacted that enabled Police to arrest, jail or fine you for walking your dog, or leaving your local area are just what globalists have wanted enacting for years. 

Just read up on UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030 for some info on what the rulers of this world have wanted to do to us for a very long time, and COVID has been used as an excuse to implement these measures faster than expected. 

It has given them an opportunity to enact laws and measures to restrict our travel, businesses, and health by using COVID as the excuse, but with Climate Change being the real reason for these measures.

For those who do not yet understand, there is no end to this. The bureaucrats, elitists and “experts” flexing their enforcement muscles do not view this as a temporary exercise. In their minds we would have all been better off long ago if we had simply accepted the fact that they knew better how we should live our lives. 

They have nibbled around the edges of that concept for many years. COVID-19 has now provided them the opportunity to exert control over literally every aspect of what we used to call personal freedom, we are basically all living in some form of an Orwellian 1984 Police State at the moment. 

The virus is just the excuse for the lockdown. Many scientists have come out to say this including 7,000 scientists who have told the British Government that lockdowns are not required anymore. Of course this has been rejected by Boris Johnson and his Tory cabinet.

From a paper entitled "UK Government Rejects Call From 7,000 Scientists & Medics To End Lockdown Measures" The British government has flatly rejected a call from thousands of scientists and medics, known as the Great Barrington group, calling for an end to lockdown measures.

The Independent reports: The Great Barrington Declaration, which has been signed by more than 7,000 scientists and medics worldwide, calls for a new strategy of allowing younger people to go about their lives as normal while offering “focused protection” to the elderly and those with underlying medical conditions who are most at risk from coronavirus.

Downing Street has rejected the call of the Great Barrington group of scientists for an end to lockdown measures, saying their argument rests on an “unproven assumption” that it would be possible to protect the most vulnerable. 

It goes on to say:

As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. 

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice. 

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed

It has won the support of UK scientists including Professor Karol Sikora, and Tory backbencher Steve Baker has urged MPs to offer it their backing, in a direct challenge to the government’s strategy. You can read the whole declaration here: The Great Barrington Declaration.

Yet despite Scientists and civilians fighting lockdown measures already, we are hearing rumblings from those who want to use lockdowns to combat climate change. 

The basis for this suggestion is simple, and terrifying in its implications. COVID-19 measures have been justified legally by the proposition that the disease constitutes a public health crisis. 

There are papers like this one that say that:

If those in power simply labelled “climate change” as a public health crisis then we they would be free to employ equally draconian measures in response and to continue them, in perpetuity, to ensure that this “threat” was vanquished.

Under a “climate lockdown,” governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently.

So as we are imprisoned in our own homes, and thousands of scientists warn of the dangers to our health, as well as our economies, the powers that be ignore them and allow a small percentage of people to get increasingly rich due to the COVID lockdown, and let them tell us as if they are informed and reliable sources, that we should keep these measures to help out with Climate Change, all as they get increasingly richer of course.

As I said in my last article

Why should we listen to the same people who have made billions off this COVID lockdown who fly about in their private jets, like Bill Gates, when they tell us we need to not travel or drive ourselves, and maybe even be locked down regularly for the sake of Climate Change. 

The 1% have made billions from COVID, the leader being Jeff Bezos who made over $90bn during the crisis, followed by Elon Musk who made $68.2bn and of course Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg who made a measly $46.5 billion in comparison. Bill Gates himself made only $20bn. but then he is helping the world by rolling out the vaccine and ensuring it reaches all corners of the globe.

So why are we listening to the same people who have made billions off this crisis as they suggest solutions to problems we may not even be facing, all whilst getting extremely rich from the consequences to society?

I just hope if the state continues their crackdown on liberty as shown in the Tweet above when people try to peacefully protest and are met with violence by the authorities, that more of us are willing to stand up for ourselves like the brave men in the video shown above.

It may literally come down to a fight to save our freedoms or live in permanent police state all on the say so of billionaires and despite scientists saying their is no reason for such measures in the first place.

Who should the government be listening to, the people or the 1%. I guess they are controlled, funded and ordered around by those DAVOS billionaires who fund their political campaigns. However all throughout this lockdown they have frequently been telling us that they are following the science throughout this pandemic and the self imprisonment is required for our own sake.

If so, why are they not listening to the scientists right now?

Read The Great Barrington Declaration here: https://gbdeclaration.org/.

By Dark Politricks

© 2021 Dark Politricks