Google AI Tells Conference Apollo Footage Was Faked!

Google AI analysis of Moon Landing photos show it was faked at AI conference

By Dark Politricks

As my time is nearing an end, I thought for a bit of fun and to get away from all the doom and gloom of Gaza, Ukraine and Donald Trump, I thought a good old conspiracy theory orientated article was in need of posting.

There are a few main conspiracies that have stuck around us for decades, whilst modern obvious ones like the assassination attempts on Donald Trump, COVID, and Epstein, seem to be getting ignored, there are a few good ones that will never die and seem to always be debated, such as who killed JFK, and was 9.11 an inside job.

Another one is the Moon Landing Conspiracy. Did we really go to the moon? 

Or rather did NASA really go to the moon in 1969, and was what the world saw on their TV sets really Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walking on the moon, or was it men on a film set?

Can people hold conflicting conspiracy or rather scientific theories in their head at the same time?

Can someone believe in Aliens, man made UAPS, Steven Greers "Lost Century", of progress due to Zero Point Energy, the sort Nikola Tesla and other inventors found out about at the beginning of the 20th Century, but were silenced over. 

As well as "free energy" from the Aether (now called the Quantum Vacuum), proved by The Casimir Effect, that could free mankind from Robber Barons that control us through our Petro-Carbon society we currently exist in, 

AND believe in Moon based conspiracy theories?

Theories such as, we didn't go to the moon at all in 1969, and it was all staged due to the Space Race, and JFK's promise to go to the Moon by the end of the century. Then due to NASA realising that it was impossible to achieve this, they decided to fake the whole event to win the race against the USSR.

It seems like an impossible equation doesn't it?

How can you believe we had the power to harness gravity, and access unlimited power from an empty cup of air in the 1940's, possibly after reverse engineering downed alien space craft like The Roswell Incident in 1947, or just from brilliant scientists like Nikola Tesla, and others who worked on the Manhattan Project. As well as believing that we couldn't reach the moon in 1969?

If we had the power to utilise Zero Point Energy, and control gravity so that we could fly around at incredible speeds in UAPs mistaken for aliens by many people back in the late 1940s, then why wouldn't we be able to reach the moon in such craft by 1969?

Well if you take the head of Lockheed Skunkworks, Ben Rich's word for it, then just before he died he claimed "We now have the technology to take ET home", and that the problem was that the technology was all locked up in off the books, Unacknowledged Special Access Projects, that are controlled by private MIC companies and not Government agencies. 

Also, if you listen to Steven Greer, he will tell you the history of how these private companies took full control of these projects, reversed engineered craft and owned the technology that came from it, without any Government oversight. 

Even the President and the head of the CIA were asking HIM, why they couldn't access these Unacknowledged Special Access Projects.

Well buckle up for what seems like a big own goal that is not making much media noise by Google. I guess it's due to their AI system talking to Putin before Trump that might be the reason. 

Anyway...

Recently at the Artificial Intelligence Journey 2023 Conference in Moscow. The Russian President was shown a photographic neural network created by Google, which brought into question the authenticity of Moon Landing snaps.

During the event, the Russian President was shown an AI analysis of the moon landing, with the claim that images of the US astronauts landing on the moon were not authentic. Putin and Nikolai Gerasimenko from Sberbank watched a Google neural network analysis of the moon landing, which suggested the possibility of synthetic photographs having been used.

President Putin, apparently just said “Very interesting,” when he was told by Gerasimenko, that the neural network “considered almost everything” in the photographs of the US landing on the moon to be fake. Also, most importantly, that "no bias" could be found because the analysis is based on Google’s neural network, an American system.

Neither the U.S. nor NASA have commented on the Google AI analysis of the Moon photos, or Putin’s response.

You can read an article about it here and NO, it is not from a Russian news site, it's an Australian site. I just had to use Yandex, a Russian based search engine to find it, as Google obviously doesn't want people to know about this news. 

What do I think?

I've gone back and forth over this issue in my head as new evidence is uncovered, also as NASA videos come out revealing that in designing the next rockets to take man into the Solar System, they can't get past Low Earth Orbit (LEO), due to radiation from the Van Allen belts, have come to the surface.

For instance in this video a NASA engineer talks about their next rockets, Orion, and how it has to do non human test flights through the Van Allen belts, so that scientists can study the data collected about the radiation and how dangerous it is. 

He says “We must solve these challenges before sending humans through this region of space”. 

Watch on YouTube.

If we went through this region of Space in what was paper thin protection in the 1960's, compared to todays spaceships, then you would expect them to know how to achieve this already. It sure would have helped if NASA hadn't decided to destroy all the technical data on how we achieved the Apollo flights. 

In a 2016 interview, veteran NASA astronaut Don Pettit made the following statement: 

"I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again."

I have, like many, watched the back and forth between scientists and researchers who have debated shadows, stars not appearing in photos, flags waving on the Moon, background scenes used in Hollywood at the time, and other photos anomalies. 

Sometimes I hear something that seems convincing, but then I hear a valid rebuttal of the idea, so I have been very open on the subject. 

I have often wondered that if the Space Race was so important to win for the USA, then why didn't the scientists from the Manhattan Project that went on to work for the Nuclear Agencies and MIC companies, that seemed to control a lot of the hidden physics that UAPs are built around, help the Government in this endeavour. 

Why didn't they let NASA use a modern Zero Point Energy based system to get to the moon?

Then I always come back to the control mechanism that this planet is currently based upon, which people like Steven Greer are trying to break. 

The world is based on a Petro-Carbon economy, and the 0.1% of people at the top of the pyramids of power don't want us to have free energy as it would hurt their bank balance as well as their grip on the mechanisms of power. 

So a display of using such energy to get to the moon would have let the cat out of the bag, so to speak, and people would have started asking questions. Of course some of us did anyway, but a global display of this control over gravity without having to use rocket fuel to get to the moon would have been a too obvious display of the goodies they controlled. 

They didn't want normal people to be able to replace paying for Oil and Gas, and use free energy devices to heat their homes, and power their modes of transport.

There has been lots of debate over the Apollo missions, and proving that NASA actually managed to reach the moon, with little tests beforehand, and many failed unmanned attempts to land, and lift back off the moon, You can see a detailed debate with videos, photos, links here if you wish,

Also when there have been attempts to photograph or visit the Apollo lunar sites, either NASA or the US Government has stepped in to prevent it. The US Congress passed a law in 2020 declaring all six Apollo lunar landing sites national heritage sites and off-limits to any other nation or private space company.

NASA also imposed no-fly zones and ground-travel buffer zones to "protect and preserve the historic and scientific value of US government lunar artifacts", in 2012. 

In 2021, during a YouTube webinar, an official of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) unveiled two low-resolution photographs of the Apollo 11 and 12 landing sites reportedly taken by the Indian Chandrayaan-2 lunar exploration mission. These are currently the most detailed landing site photographs available, but skeptics have disputed their authenticity and origin.

However, the point that convinced me that we went to the Moon, was that I was informed by a video debunking conspiracies about the mission that thousands of people with telescopes all over the world, watched the trip happen with their own eyes. 

If I hadn't had heard that people watched the Apollo 11 rocket fly to the moon with telescopes, then I would have had more questions but then Apollo 8 managed to get to the moon, it just didn't have a moon lander.

Apollo 11 apparently manged to go to the moon with less computing power than a modern smart phone multiplied by a hundred thousand. They had less computing power than the first Spectrum and Amstrad PCs. The iPhone 11 has more than a million times computing power than Apollo 11's guidance computer which only had 74KB ROM and 4KB RAM. 

So the main question I want answered about NASA space missions is this. 

If we went to the moon in the 60s with less computing power than a modern day calculator. 

Then why can we not leave Low Earth Orbit (LEO) now?

Sure we can send non human Satellites, and James Webb & Hubble telescopes past LEO, but we can't for some reason place the International Space Station, or even attempt to send a test flight with humans aboard out of LEO.

Why? 

Surely since 1972 our technology has advanced a bit. The reason given by NASA, is that it cost too much money, £257bn (in todays money), to achieve the feat, and people have lost interest in Space.

However that is not really accurate. 

The recent rescue of NASA astronauts by Elon Musk's SpaceX rocket engaged the people, and there is enough talk about UAP's even in Congress, that if all the MIC companies with machines that could fly to the moon in minutes were made public. Then I think the people would be very engaged and interested.

However, that would never happen until the Petro-Carbon economy is overthrown, as the Globalists in control of possible Secret Space Fleets, Breakaway Civilisations, and the mining of asteroids for trillion dollars of rare minerals, don't want to risk losing the money they currently make from selling Oil and Gas to us.

However, even if we went to the moon, I have never believed the photos and film were real for the reasons listed below. I agree with Google's AI analysis of the photos, and no they are not the usual flag, shadows and stars arguments:

1. Prior to the manned Apollo 8 lunar orbiting mission in December 1968, NASA had not sent any animals through the Van Allen radiation belts. When the Apollo 11 mission went to the Moon, they did not know what effect the radiation from passing the belts, the strong Sun rays on the Moon, and walking on the lunar surface, would have on any camera film footage taken.

This was a recent excuse given by a NASA scientist on designing the next space flight to leave LEO, on why we currently can't do so. The effect of this radiation on human beings.

If they don't know the effect on humans now because for some strange reason NASA decided to destroy all the data needed to go back in the future. Then the question remains how did they manage it back in 1969? 

Even if we admit they did manage it in 1969. Then I want to know how would NASA know the effect on camera film or even the television signal sent back home from the Moon, passing through this strong radiation belt. 

It might have failed, or destroyed the film due to radiation, and it was untested until the actual event. 

Showing live footage to the world would have been a big gamble if NASA did not even know if the TV signal would reach Earth okay to be viewed live. It was a risk they could not take I suggest, which is why they only had one stream to a single TV, and they filmed the moon walk on a filmset before the actual launch. 

Whether they went to the Moon or not is moot in my argument, as I am only arguing that the footage and photos from the Moon were faked, and it seems a Google AI analysis of the footage agrees with me.

2. All the photos are beautifully taken on the way to the moon with a Hasselblad camera, and when on the lunar surface, the camera was mounted on a bracket on the chest of the astronaut’s space suit.

Astronaut Buzz Aldrin walks on the surface of the Moon near the leg of the lunar module Eagle during the Apollo 11 mission.

Neil Armstrong apparently took 120 pictures whilst on the Moon, and during the six Apollo missions, a total of 12 astronauts walked on the surface of the moon and took a combined total of around 25,000 photographs.

The question is how did they manage to take so many perfect pictures in the little time they spent outside?

On a podcast with people who had investigated it for years. I will always remember one researcher saying it was impossible for the 2hrs 15min on the surface to take as many camera shots as they did in so little time.

The maths just doesn't work. They just didn't have the time to take so many perfect pictures. How did they manage so many perfectly taken photos with their chest bound cameras, whilst experiencing weightlessness for the first time, and doing their other tasks?

How many camera shots were badly taken due to the experience of being on the lunar surface with gravity issues, and a chest bound camera unlike those we have on our smart phones today?

They would have been constantly taking pictures with their chest bound cameras with no time to pick up the 400kg of moon rocks they supposedly brought back home. 

However fake moon rocks have been uncovered, like the famous incident where a Dutch museum realised their rock was just petrified wood. 

"The Dutch national museum said Thursday that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood." 

Its amazing what Buzz Aldrin keeps finding in his sock drawer to auction off. 

3. Why did NASA force everyone to film one TV in their HQ for their coverage rather than just beam it worldwide?

That's why the original TV footage of the Moon landing is so grainy and such poor quality.

The BBC for instance, along with all other major news corporations covering the mission, literally had to point a camera at a TV where a single stream was being shown. Like me videoing my TV on my phone but using 1960s tech.

It would have made any conspiracy to hide the fake moon footage which could have been recorded months before the event so much easier.

They would have even been able to hide the lie from the staff working at NASA, who were all compartmentalised, none of them would have known if the footage being shown was live or recorded before the flight. 

4. The press conference with the astronauts after their return to earth and isolation period for "safety reasons"

I am not sure whether MK Ultra psychiatrist Jolyon West passed by for a visit at anytime, as the 3 astronauts look like silent stunned rabbits caught in the headlights, when they were finally famously interviewed. 

It is as if they are doped up on strong drugs, or hypnotised to act disinterested and not as if they just accomplished a great feat for the USA. 

Or were they just totally embarrassed because they knew they were total frauds sitting in front of the world's press, pretending they were heroes?

Watch on YouTube.

It is very strange behaviour I think for 3 people who should have been raving about their record breaking experience as the first people to walk on the moon.

5. The film maker Bart Sibrel, found NASA footage, not meant for us to see, that suggests even the TV stream of the Astronauts halfway to the moon on day 2 were actually still flying in LEO. 

He used this in his documentary "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" that shows the astronauts in Low Earth Orbit pretending they were halfway to the moon. 

They did this by using a cardboard cutout on the window of the craft to make the earth look smaller as if they were halfway to the moon.

Also a CIA secret radio channel is heard telling them to wait 4 seconds before replying to a radio message. 

This is supposedly so it seemed like a longer radio delay, as if the ship was halfway to the moon and not still in LEO. 

You can watch that here if you want. 

Of course people have videos debunking the film but that is up to you to decide whether the Apollo 11 mission actually went to the Moon or not. 

I think they went, whether they did everything the video shown to one screen in NASA HQ happened or not I don't know. However, I think all the photos were staged, along with the video footage. 

In this regards, I agree with Googles AI analysis of the images from the mission. 

Google is part of the CIA, so I am basically agreeing with the CIA for once!

You might also find this recent interview with Bart Sibrel interesting. 

In it, he discusses the documentary, Google AI analysis of the photos, attempts on his life, killings of whistleblowers, deathbed confessions and more. 

Now if NASA did fake the moon landing, I don't know why didn't Russia blow the whistle on the fake voyage for PR purposes. 

However, apart from the usual theories you hear about this, maybe it was because the Soviets didn't want the USA to reveal that maybe Yuri Gagarin, wasn't actually the first person into space. 

In fact according to some people, he was just the first of about 10 Soviet astronauts that actually made it home alive.

There could probably be a few old Soviet rockets circling earth right now, with skeletons of Russian cosmonauts and dogs, that never made it back to the motherland.

Maybe once the USA had won the propaganda war, they gave up on their own attempts to land a man on the moon.

Or maybe just as they are doing now, and as JFK wanted until he was killed. Russia and the USA are still collaborating on space missions, NASA ones, and Globalist Dark Fleet Missions, that we just don't know the full details about.

Only the other week, a Russian spacecraft safely delivered an American astronaut Jonathan Kim and two Russian cosmonauts to the International Space Station (ISS). 

This has been going on for years, all through the US proxy war in Ukraine against Russia, and during periods of sanctions. It seems whatever else is going on, when it comes to Space, the USA and Russia are happy to cooperate.

This is of course ignoring any discussion on aliens, and the theory that we never went back to the Moon because we were warned to stay away, or agreements with aliens such as the Greada Treaty, President Eisenhower supposedly signed which allowed for an exchange of advanced technology for the aliens to abduct humans.

There is also the theory that the Breakaway Civilisation, that is controlled by a Globalist Cartel has it's own Space Fleet that uses advanced technology, that Lockheed Skunkworks Ben Rich admitted we could take ET home with, and is hidden from the global population.

The NASA project, run mostly by NAZI scientists, the USA brought over after WWII in Operation Paperclip, was just a propaganda project for us mere mortals. Whilst a Secret Cabal of Globalists, use the forbidden technology such as Zero Point Energy from Quantum Vacuums, to run their own space operations and work hand in hand with alien entities.

You can watch an interview I have with Gary McKinnon who the US tried for a decade to try and extradite for revealing an off-world Naval manifest for crew members not in the Navy.

Plus a before and after photo of a supposed alien spacecraft on the moon he found on US military computer systems. He apparently found a photo of a cigar shaped spacecraft on the moon, and then the same picture but with the spacecraft airbrushed out.

The USA definitely tried their best to lock him up forever, even waiting for the UK to change its extradition treaty before an endless court battle.

If he all he had done was use a simple to make port scanner to find open ports and blank admin passwords on Naval Base computers, as he claims, then he should have been awarded money for "ethical hacking", as they call it now, rather than the torment he went through. 

So back to my question. 

Why have humans not been able or willing to leave Low Space Orbit since the Apollo missions ended? 

When you ask Google why we haven't left LEO since the Apollo missions the main reason given is money and a loss in public interest. 

However if we are willing to let our government spend billions on never ending wars then I am sure the "First human space  flight out of Low Earth Orbit" would actually be quite a newsworthy event and I am sure Elon Musk's SpaceX, would love to take the reigns if NASA won't. 

So if Google's AI system really knows the answer, they are obviously hiding it from us peasants but it only confirms what I have long suspected about the photos from the Moon, they are fakes, whether or not we went there in 1969.

Thoughts?

By Dark Politricks

© 2025 - Dark Politricks

Unfriendly Peace Talks At The White House

Donald Trump Gives Zelenskyy A Telling Off

By Dark Politricks

Zelenskyy got a right telling off on Friday in the White House by US President Trump and VP, JD Vance. 

In front of the whole world, Zelenskyy and the White House argued publicly about the war and what peace deal Trump could offer. 

Watch the debacle below.

Now Europe, and the UK, has stepped in to fill the gap after the US stopped military aid, and the sharing of military intelligence with Ukraine. 

UK's PM Sir Kier Starmer, is promising to give Ukraine help including money the UK can't afford and military aid. 

He is even talking about "putting boots on the ground, and planes in the air", in Ukraine. 

Poland and France, along with the head of the EU, Ursula von der Leyen, are also being very bullish. They seem to want to continue this war, one that has ravaged Europe, even as Trump tries to end it with Putin. 

The French President has even spoken about breaking the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, by giving other European states nuclear weapons. 

Emmanuel Macron the French President said in a speech, said he was willing to extend the French nuclear deterrent to European allies to protect the continent in the face of threats from Russia.

Russia has responded, with foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, saying that Macron’s speech was a direct threat to Moscow and “extremely confrontational”. 

This is a war that has seen our economic attack on Russia using sanctions backfire, as Russia had to become self reliant with the world's 11th largest GDP, just below Canada and Italy's, whilst Europe's economy has stagnated.

Most people don't realise that all night on Russian TV they talk about how easily they could destroy the whole country. 

One Russian nuclear torpedo in the Irish Sea is all that is needed apparently, in a plan discussed on the TV show, The Great Game, to cause a tsunami to wash the UK away.

All this pro-war talk is continuing whilst multiple peace deals have been on the table, and opportunities to have a lasting peace with Russia have existed for years. 

We pushed Putin into the war to protect the Russian speaking Donbass from the Ukrainian forces shelling them for 8yrs, and now it seems Putin will end it. 

That is if Zelenskky does not come crawling back and apologises to Trump, who stopped all foreign aid to Ukraine on Monday.

Whatever your feelings about the war in Ukraine, it does not change basic facts about our dealings with Russia. 

Some of them I have listed below:

• We lied to Gorbachev. All Western leaders, Ambassadors, NATO, even the Pope said "NATO would not move one inch Eastward if the USSR pulled out of Eastern Europe". We broke that promise and expanded right up to their doorstep. Something the USA would never allow Russia to do to them. Can you imagine what the USA would do if Russia placed military bases in Canada or Mexico?

• NATO was not disbanded even when the Warsaw Pact alliance was. Therefore it is not now a defensive pact but an offensive alliance.

• We funded and helped install a drunk, Boris Yeltsin as Russian President. We then ransacked the country. A lot of Western politicians (Clinton's etc), got rich from Russia selling its natural resources and industries on the cheap.

• We never forgave Putin when he took control of Russia for stopping this fire sale, and we have funded opposition parties and attempted colour revolutions in Russia, as well as Georgia, and Ukraine.

• Putin asked to join NATO twice and was rebuffed.

• Putin was the first leader to ring George W Bush and offer help after 9.11. In fact they helped with the Northern Alliance when the US invaded Afghanistan looking for bin-Laden, who had denied responsibility for the attack. In fact the CIA had flown him to Pakistan before the invasion. This was revealed by a recent US Senator on the online news show Redacted, and also in recent released CIA documents.

• Russian security guarantee requests were rebuffed by the West multiple times. From 2001 onwards. 

• The Minsk 1 and 2, peace deal accords between Russia, Ukraine, Germany and France that Putin believed in and agreed to. Designed to keep the Donbass and Crimea part of Ukraine, were used as a "Stalling tactic" to give NATO time to train Ukraine's army to fight Russia. Ex German and French leaders, Merkel and Sarkosy, have both admitted this.

• The US planned to place missiles under the guise of stopping Iran attacking Europe, that could be used to quickly attack Russia, in Eastern Europe. The hypocrisy is striking as the USA nearly started WWIII over the USSR doing the same during the Cuban Crisis in the 1960's.

• USA pulled out of the INF (intermediate nuclear missile treaty), allowing short range nukes. This is why we saw Russia develop, and recently use, the Oreshnik missile. This acts like a nuke, pulverising atoms without the radiation damage and mushroom cloud.

• Under Obama, Victoria Nuland fomented a colour revolution that overthrew a democratically elected leader and installed a far right government in Ukraine.

• The "Maiden Coup" in 2014, that started a civil war, and saw the invasion of Crimea by Russia to prevent their main sea port being denied to them, led to the shelling of schools, hospitals, and town markets in the Donbass that killed 16k people over 8yrs.

• For 8 years the breakaway republic in Donbass asked for Russian help. Putin tricked into believing he was dealing with honest western politicians, put his faith into the Minsk accords, supposedly designed to stop this civil war, and keep Ukraine intact.

• Only when it became clear he had been lied to and massive Ukrainian forces were about to invade did the Russians invade. This was after their Duma passed laws and self defence treaties were signed with the breakaway Republican. This is legal and allowed under article 51 of the UN.

• As Russia invaded Ukraine they also had peace talks in Istanbul designed to stop the invasion. These were initialed but never signed after Boris Johnson flew in and promised Zelensky he could win the war with Western backing.

• Russia has tried multiple times looking for someone to talk peace with but Zelenskyy made it a crime to engage in peace talks with Putin in 2022.

• Zelenskyy is probably under threat of death from far right factions who are Bandarite NAZI worshippers like the Right Sektor and AZOV Brigade which prevent him from peace talks. However the fact there was no one under the Biden administration for the Russians to speak to, and discuss peace, is undeniable. 

Unlike Biden, Trump is at least willing to speak to Putin. 

In all major wars the opposite sides talk to each other still to ensure no mistakes or miscalculation are made especially concerning nuclear materials. 

Unless Europe and Zelenskyy comes to it's senses, the USA will surely stop all military aid to Ukraine permanently, and Russia will end up winning the war to Ukraine's cost. I hope sense prevails.

Whether you support Ukraine or Russia in this war, like it or not, you cannot rewrite history according to your emotions. 

This is what seems to be happening in the anti-Trump media.

By Dark Politricks

© 2025 Dark Politricks

Lindsay Graham Will Sanction And Destroy Economies For ICC Warrant On Benjamin Netanyahu

Sen Lindsay Graham Threatens To Destroy The UK's Economy

By Dark Politricks

He has recently made speeches in the Senate and on TV over the recent ICC arrest warrant issued for Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes.

He threatened the UK with the collapse of our economy, which doesn't need much help really, if we dared to carry out the lawful act, of arresting the Israeli PM and handing him over to the Hauge for a trial.

Lindsay Graham belongs to a small list of countries such as Russia, Israel and China, and the USA, that did not join the ICC.

It's a good list of countries, which you would expect to carry out war crimes. It's not a list of "moral" countries in many people's eyes.

Despite being ecstatic over the ICC's issue of an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin, for putting orphaned children into Russian orphanages due to Ukraine killing its own people. He was charged with kidnap for giving these orphans roofs over their head as thanks.

Israeli IDF soldiers would have just shot them dead. Then they would have probably uploaded the video of them doing it or bragging about killing it, to TikTok for the world and ICC court to view.

The ICC Court would have added that video to their already huge collection of evidence, already collected from IDF soldiers own social media accounts. 

The prosecution have said that Israel basically convicted itself with the numerous pieces of video evidence from IDF Social Media accounts, and the speeches made by Netanyahu, and the also convicted ex Israeli Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant.

Netanyahu is now attacking the part of the world willing to keep some form of morality, even if it's words only, from following the ICC's wishes. 

He is obviously calling the ICC Court anti-Semitic, despite the UN and the court having been created from the ashes of World War II and allowing the creation of the Israeli State on top of Palestine. 

Probably one of the biggest mistakes the UN has ever carried out.

I doubt any country have the balls, to arrest Netanyahu if he came to their country.

I am not sure if the UK is such a moral country with the courage to arrest the Israeli PM at all. In fact I can imagine Sir Kier Starmer inviting Bibi over to 10 Downing St for Sunday lunch anytime soon now.

The UK also helped support Israel for n it's genocidal war with the supply of weapons, air support to shoot down incoming Iranian missiles, and surveillance intelligence from spy planes, constantly hovering over Gaza during the genocide they were, and is still carrying out.

So really we are on the same side as Israel and the USA in our immoral behaviour regarding Gaza.

Still, Mossad through AIPAC, probably reminded Lindsay of a tape they most definitely have of him.

Rumours about the Senator, hiring gay sex workers from certain websites, may have resulted in tapes he would definitely not want released.

I think a Senator such as Graham is most definitely compromised from a taped encounter that may have been Epstein linked, and collected by Israels intelligence agencies, to put another Israel First politician into the US government.

This explains why he is always willing to put Israel over his own people, State and even country so eagerly

This is a most serious and potent reason how AIPAC controls so much of the US political class, who do their bidding, whenever they demand or request it. 

By Dark Polirtricks

© 2024 Dark Politricks

The Real Reason The USA Wants To Own Ukraine

Sen. Lindsey Graham Lets Loose The Real Real Reason The USA Wants Ukraine

By Dark Politricks

Sen. Lindsey Graham, that masculine war hawk in DC, that wants everyone but himself to die for his campaign contributions from the MIC, let slip the real reason the USA wants to keep Ukraine all for itself (BlackRock, Vanguard etc).

It seems that these ancient war hawks just can't get over the fact that whatever faults Putin has, and he has many like all corrupt world leaders. They just can't rip off the Russian people like they did in the years when a drunken clown, Boris Yeltsin, was President of Russia.

When Boris Yeltsin was helped into office by the western powers he basically let capitalism loose on his country to the furthest reaches of what the term meant. US companies and Russia oligarchs basically bought up whole privatised industries on the cheap and when Putin came in and stopped the fire sale of Russia it stopped a lot of people getting rich very easily.

Here we can hear Sen. Graham on some US MSM TV show give away the real reason he and other Americans don't care if a whole generation of Ukrainians die or go missing from the country.

Yes it's all down to those pesky rare earth minerals like Lithium, worth a thousand times their weight in gold in the new age of electric cars and smart phone batteries.

How dare Putin think he can take these minerals for himself and sell them to China when the US and NATO can risk World War III (and yes we are nearly there people), to steal them for themselves. They have already carved Ukraine's nationalised industries, and fields that were once labelled the bread basket of Europe, up for Blackrock and it's ilk. 

I mean Ukraine owes the USA billions under it's lease lend act, and as the UK only finished off paying back it's "friend" who helped it out during World War II under Gordon Browns premiership in 2006. It may take Ukraine, if it wins the war, or has some sort of existence outside Russian control, many decades to pay back. 

With all its nationalised industries privatised for US companies to run and make money from, and the farm land, carved up, despite most of the fertile fields laying the East. Ukraine won't have much money from industry to pay back loans given to it for weapons and salaries, bribes and offshore bank accounts.

It got so corrupt with Zelenskyy and his Right Sektor mob, who have him under their control. basically threatened with death if he doesn't do as they say. That the US CIA Director, William Burns, had to fly into Ukraine himself to tell the Ukrainian leader to stop stealing so much money as it was getting harder and harder to cover up. 

If anyone didn't know Ukraine is the most corrupt country in Europe then they should now.

Ukraine may have difficulty paying back its "generous backer" who has offloaded all it's old weaponry and vehicles to Ukraine so that the billions passed in Congress for Ukraine, are no more than a DC laundering scheme. 

This works because the Senators and Congress people passing the funding bills. get to hand the money over to the Military Industrial Complex companies that send over their left over weapons, including tanks and APC's, unchecked Javelin missiles, and other military equipment that have been lying in warehouses since the 90's, to Ukraine,  

You can see some US soldiers out in the desert attempt a Javelin missile launch below.

In contrast the Ukrainians are finding out how good the Russian equivalent, the Kornet is, against their own tanks.

At least some Ukrainians benefit from the US weapons that are sent over without the US even knowing where they are going or who is using them. Some which have been found on the Darknet being sold of $30,000 a pop.

Then take the newly passed money by government to line it's own pockets and develop newer weapons that the Ukrainians won't see, and then complete the circle by paying the politicians who passed the bill huge campaign contributions, that obviously are used to feather their own pockets. So the Ukrainians lose out twice, they get ropey equipment from the USA, and have to hand over their huge pockets of precious minerals if Sen. Lindsay Graham gets his way,

If you wondered why the West hates Russia so much it comes down to the oldest motive in time, greed. The US want what the Russians have and they don't want to pay for it. So instead they have destroyed a whole country in an attempt to get at it.

The Biden administration last month secretly shipped long-range missiles, ATACMS, to Ukraine for the first time in the two-year war and Kyiv has already used the weapon twice to strike deep behind Russian lines. They have the ability to reach far behind Russian lines and have already been used to attack Russian early warning systems that help them defend against a nuclear attack. 

This has crossed one of Russia's red lines and clearly crosses the line behind Russia's nuclear doctrine of when it can and cannot use nuclear weapons. If it can be attacked by missiles that could carry nuclear warheads so close to the border of the country, the Russians have no idea whether they do or don't. Every firing of one of these missiles relies on a judgment call by Russia's military on whether to legally launch their nuclear arsenal and end the world or not.

As these missiles are not ICBMS they pose a particular new risk to Russia and it's early warning radar stations and both Sergey Lavrov and Putin have clearly stated that this crosses a red line and puts nuclear weapons into play due to their nuclear doctrine which determines whether nuclear missiles can be fired or not.

Putin has also clearly noted that Russia and NATO are now in "direct confrontation". Because certain weapon systems rely on secretive guidance information from US satellites to allow for the targeting of certain long range weapons, the Russians have also made it clear that they know that it is NATO troops doing the targeting and firing of these weapons not the Ukrainians. This puts NATO and Russia in direct conflict. 

We are basically at war with Russia and all pretence of NATO just helping Ukraine out has gone. 

We are at war with Russia. 

So if you live in the US or Europe and were wondering whether we were close to a nuclear Armageddon then the answer is yes. 

We have never been so close to the end of the world. At least during the Cuba Missile crisis there were two adults in the room on opposing sides, here we have one, Putin. Across him sits a senile dithering old fool, and no-one really knows who in the deep state is running the show. 

Whoever it is, they have little care for the fate of the world if their recent actions breaking yet another of their own red lines, by sending long range weapons to Ukraine is anything to go by.

We are in World War III.

Will we live through it? 

Well we know one thing, Sen. Lindsey Graham won't get his hands on all those precious jewels in the Ukrainian ground if it is a nuclear wasteland. So until that matter is sorted we may be safe,.

By Dark Politricks

© 2024 Dark Politricks

The Crocus Massacre - Ukrainian Involvement

Russia Links Crocus Terrorists To Ukrainian Funding Source

By Dark Politricks

A report by Russian investigators has confirmed payment from Ukraine in cryptocurrency from the perpetrators of the terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall in Moscow.

The report by Russia points to the Ukrainian special services, but says: “we must understand that they are directly connected with the CIA and MI6 and MI5,”

Scott Ritter, a former Iraqi UN arms Inspector who tried to stop the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003 has said publicly that the attack does not look like an ISIS style attack, and the fact that the attackers planned on escaping alive to Ukraine rather than dying like martyrs is a sign that it was a cover for the Tajik hitmen who were seemingly hired over Telegram by Ukrainian special forces.

I laid out the simple steps that seemed to show that the Islamic Terrorist plot was just a cover for another plan in my Twitter posts starting here: Step by step guide to Moscow Terror Attacks Western Links.

With the West so eager to claim that Ukraine was not behind the attack just minutes after the concert hall attack one must ask how did they know when the perpetrators had not even been caught and interrogated at that time.

That alone and the pre-warning to US citizens to stay away from public spaces specifically "Music Concerts", yet no back-channel communication to Russia about how they knew of the attack and providing evidence of foreknowledge is enough to leave the Western intelligence agencies such as the CIA and MI6 on a list of possible suspects.

It seems that because Ukraine can no longer fight the Russian advance directly due to the majority of it's NATO supplied tanks and missile defence systems having been destroyed as well as estimates ranging from 400,000 to 1,000,000 million dead soldiers, they are now resorting to terrorist tactics inside Russia. 

From this video, you can see that the state is happily sending school kids off to the front lines to fulfil the USA's wish to fight Russia down to the last Ukrainian, whether this means losing a whole generation of citizens from the very young, to the very old.

It seems that as Russia has already destroyed Ukraine's NATO-trained first two Armies it is now unfortunately tasked to destroy an army of students and press-ganged people dragged from their homes or off the street.

The world does not realise that the situation here is as dangerous as the Cuban missile crisis, but even more so due to the size of the nuclear bombs now being used by each side.

However it seems the roles are reversed though, and if Putin is JFK there is no one home at the White House to play Khrushchev and come to the negotiating table which Russia has been wanting to do ever since it first negotiated a peace settlement in the early stages of the war in Belarus and then Turkey.

The Ukrainian negotiator who initialled the peace deal ready for Zelenskyy to sign has been publicly speaking about the deal and wonders why it is was never fully signed.

Here, Ray McGovern, ex CIA, and a member of a Security Analysts for Sanity group that tries to bring some balance to this mad world, with other ex-US intelligence and military members like Scott Ritter, gives an interesting view often dismissed by Western news services.

In this video he talks about how there was a peace agreement, how Russia pulled its long line of tanks pointing towards Kyiv out as a sign of good faith so that negotiations could go forward, and how Boris Johnson was sent to Zelenskyy to tell him not to proceed.

It seems that Zelenskyy made a Faustian bargain with NATO in that they would give him milirtay aid, pay for his whole government's wages and pensions using money from Western tax payers, and and continue until the last Ukrainian.

Let's just hope that any terrorism in Russia that has been initiated by the NATO-backed Ukraine, and especially the CIA and MI6, has not put paid to any hopes of a peace settlement.

If someone with a modicum of sense on the Ukrainian side wants to negotiate peace, let's hope the Crocus massacre of kids at a music concert is not the end of any chance to resolve this war without Russia having to kill all these poor Ukrainian kids sent to the front lines.

The massacre is not something I would wish to have my country's hands involved in, and if they have been covertly supporting terrorist groups to attack the Russian capital, then I hope Russia keeps the level of patience and calm it has done so far, and is still willing to talk peace.

By Dark Politricks

© 2024 Dark Politricks

Tucker Carlson Interview With Putin

The Western Mainstream Media Goes Mad That They Don't Get To Interview President Putin 

By Dark Politricks

As the western MSM frothed at the mouth at Tucker Carlson being treated like a rock star in Russia. Where he visited the ballet and was treated a lot better than Russian journalists I'm sure. The interview with Russian President Putin was enlightening, especially for those in denial of facts some of us have known for years.

I watched a Judge Napolitano interview with a supposed ex CIA analyst only the other week where he denied that at the beginning of the war there had been peace talks in Istanbul which were signed but not confirmed, only for US poodle Boris Johnson to go to Kyiv and tell President Zelensky not to accept any peace deal, as the US and EU would support and fund them in a fight against the Russians. 

Even though it was one of the lead Ukrainian negotiators at Davos repeating this story this so called expert dismissed the whole story like a lot of people who don't bother to read or watch anything outside their narrow pre defined mindset.

Here was one of the lead Ukrainian peace negotiators at the WEF relaying a well known story to anyone who has actually studied the war, but this didn't fit this supposed intelligence specialists view that no peace talks had taken place.

Why am I saying this? 

Well President Putin repeats the story in part of Tuckers interview and basically says he is willing to discuss terms with a serious opposing figure on a peace deal along the same lines as this original deal when Russia had sent in a miles long tank column, Not to invade Kyiv as some people think, but to get the politicians to the negotiating table, and it worked.

What we need now is someone to actually realise Russia has defeated 3 Ukrainian armies and the only people left to fight are old men, young boys and women. Surely this overture made publicly should be regarded as a sign that real negotiations to end the war can begin.

Putin does not want to invade Poland or the Baltic states. He has no wish to govern a hostile country whatever remains of Ukraine, and people need to believe this as he speaks straight and believe it or not he has tried to get along with the West since taking over from Boris Yeltsin. 

What the western countries don't like is that they cannot ransack Russian state assets as they did during the Yeltsin days when the Oligarchs ruled supreme. Putin put a stop to that and the neo-cons and neo-liberals hate him for it.

You can watch the main part of the interview where he talks about the peace deal here.

Or you can watch the whole interview here.

What do you think? 

Is Putin lying to the world or telling the truth that he wants a negotiated settlement to the conflict? 

Let me know in the comments below.

By Dark Politricks

© 2024 By Dark Politricks

Russia v NATO - Modern War In A Time Of Hypocrisy And A US Rules Based Order

The War That Destroyed Europe and Independent Thought

By Dark Politricks

As Europe heads into Winter, and the US White House seems hell-bent on fighting the Ukrainian war down to the last man. We need to reflect on our common values here in the West. Some of you may think Putin is the nearest thing to Hitler on the planet, but if you do think that, it just goes to show how far our western civilization has fallen in the era of Social Media Propaganda, and how easy it is to brainwash people using media, social and old, into one way of thinking.

You may have heard, if you watched the right shows, that the US was urging Zelenskyy to try to settle with Putin now before the Winter sets in and 300,000 new Russian recruits, and all their tanks, fitted to drive on the snow, come rolling into Ukraine to mop up what remains of the Ukrainian armies.

This is despite Zelenskyy himself signing a law that makes negotiating with Russia a criminal offense. He has basically prevented himself from ever negotiating a peace settlement, or else face up to 15 years in prison for "cooperation with the aggressor state”. After all the lies and false promises from the west, I doubt Russia would be interested anyway.

Whilst you might think erroneously that Ukraine is winning the war, with its take over of Kharkiv and Kherson, two cities the Russians basically vacated as they did not have enough men to keep hold of them. It seems Putin and his top Generals do not like risking the lives of their soldiers for a worthless cause with a lack of troops. However, it seems they do not mind the retribution killings of pro-Russian civilians that take place by Ukrainian soldiers whenever they re-capture a town.

The Ukrainians are good at killing their own civilians, as we saw in Bucha, a town that was reclaimed and proudly shouted about by the mayor for 2 days with no mention of dead bodies laying in the streets at all. 

That was until the SBU and AZOV Brigade NAZI's enrolled in to the Ukrainian State Police, carried out a "cleansing", which saw freshly killed dead Ukrainians who had taken aid from Russian troops, lying on the sides of the road, clearly labelled with red bandanas to show their support for Russia. Of course, this was somehow wangled into a "Russia did it" war crime, despite all the discrepancies, just as many other Ukrainian crimes have been.

This might be why when the Russians recently vacated Kherson they evacuated civilians into Russia before leaving the city and blowing up the bridges behind them. Now those civilians who chose to stay behind will now have to face the SBU, the Ukrainian Security Services.

There is a list that includes bloggers and journalists which the SBU have been following, and executing, not only in Ukraine when they find someone who took food or supplies from Russian soldiers but also as this article reveals, US Senators, Pop Musicians, and people who dare to speak against the pro-Ukrainian, everything they do MUST be good, narrative. 

Here is Pink Floyds musician Roger Waters on the kill list.

Roger Waters on the Ukrainian/CIA kill list for daring to challenge the official narrative

Of course this list has links and maybe even origins in the CIA, as this report reveals, as it not only targets independent journalists in Ukraine but “traitors” such as writers Chris Hedges and Glenn Greenwald, political scientist John Mearsheimer, Pink Floyd singer Roger Waters, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), former presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard, conservative military analyst Edward Luttwak who was placed on the list for suggesting that referendums should be held in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, and Henry Kissinger, who is worried about the prospects of a war between the U.S. and Russia.

A US law passed in May, House Resolution 7691, the Additional Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2022, according to Scott Ritter, who is also on the kill list for speaking out about the true history of post-Communist Russia, and the US coup of 2014 in Ukraine, abridges freedom of speech and a free press by supporting the Government of Ukraine’s publication of the “blacklist,”. 

You can hear Scott speak about the list and Congress approval here:

This list singles out U.S. citizens as “Russian propagandists” for exercising their constitutional rights pertaining to free speech and a free press. He lives not far from a park in upstate New York, where many Ukrainians live, who hold rallies in the park to celebrate the NAZI collaborator, Stepan Bandera, a Ukrainian nationalist who helped kill thousands of Jews and Poles in Pogroms in Ukraine during and after WWII.

Stepan Bandera in New York, the Ukrainian NAZI

From this extract from an article written by a Donbass blogger, titled, "SBU THE TERRIBLE UKRAINIAN POLITICAL POLICE, ASSASSINATIONS AND TORTURE", we have this independent bloggers views of the Ukrainian special security forces spelled out very clearly.

There is no war in Donbass… only an anti-terrorist operation. Yes you read that right, it’s a law of the Rada of Ukraine that was passed back in 2014, there is no war in Eastern Ukraine… but terrorists who were seeking to destroy the country. According to this rhetoric, the SBU, which deals with counter-espionage, was deployed and very quickly committed numerous abuses, assassinations and various crimes. According to various sources, the SBU had nearly 30,000 agents and employees, and very quickly attacked anything Russian, anti-Maidan and which could hinder the march of the Coloured Revolution financed and organised by the USA, in the winter of 2013-2014. The young blogger Marina Russkaya (pseudonym to protect her family in Ukraine), a student of political science in the capital (2012-2015) told us at the time about her journey. Having started writing against the Maidan, she was soon in contact with other activists and soon followed by tens of thousands of people. It was during a morning in 2015 that she was called by an activist friend in Kiev: “you have to flee Marina, they are breaking down my door, they are coming to get you!" Taking only her handbag, the young woman, then aged 24, fled Ukraine. Luckily, she was able to take a train to Russia and from there to the Donbass. That day, the SBU raid caught several dozen activists in its net. When asked about this, Marina said she had no news: “they were murdered, imprisoned, they will certainly be killed if they have survived in the Ukrainian prisons where they are languishing, the SBU will not let them live before fleeing”.

These security forces are the same people suspected of taking money from Western aid and buying flash cars. If they cannot get the cash directly they don't mind selling US armaments to Biker gangs in Scandinavia or terrorists on the Dark Web. According to NBI Detective Superintendent Christer Ahlgren, “Weapons shipped [by various countries] to Ukraine have also been found in Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands.” Before the war, even the USA deemed them nearer a criminal organisation than the freedom fighters they now believe they are. 

The SBU Security / Terrorist Services of Ukraine

So why is the British Secret Services combining forces with the SBU and other Ukrainian security services to create a terrorist army in Crimea?

On October 28th, a Ukrainian drone attack damaged the Russian Black Sea fleet’s flagship vessel in the Crimean port of Sevastopol. 

The UK plans to attack Russian ships and targets in Crimea

Moscow immediately blamed Britain for assisting and orchestrating the strike, as well as blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines, the worst acts of industrial sabotage in recent memory.

Nord Stream pipelines, blown up by the UK and USA, a terrorist attack on allies.

The British Ministry of Defence issued a blustery denial in response, branding the accusations “false claims of an epic scale.” Whoever was behind those specific attacks, suspicions of a British hidden hand in the destruction are not unfounded. 

The Grayzone has obtained leaked documents detailing British military-intelligence operatives linking an agreement with the Security Service of Ukraine’s Odessa branch, to create and train a secret Ukrainian partisan terror army.

Their plans called for the secret army to conduct sabotage and reconnaissance operations targeting Crimea on behalf of the Ukrainian Security Service, precisely the kind of attacks witnessed in past weeks. You can read more about how the UK has been collaborating with terrorists here on the Grayzone

It seems that when morality meets conflict, the west literally has no legs to stand on to accuse Russia of crimes that our own governments have been plotting and committing in Ukraine. Our western news services only provide propaganda to audiences who may swap from the BBC to ITV or CNN to MSNBC, to get their different perspectives on the war, yet each channel churns out the same narrative. Everything Ukraine does is good, or not mentioned, and everything Russia does is bad.

However, when the ground turns cold, and the Russian tanks are ready to roll, we will finally get to see the Russian army fight without all the constraints Putin has put on it since invading Ukraine. 

He is at least partly responsible for all the assassinations and killings of pro-Russian Ukrainians that were left behind in towns their under-manned army vacated to leave to the hands of SBU members to "cleanse", and then try and wangle their abuses as Russian killings just as they tried to do with their S300 Shell that was fired into Poland and killed 2 Polish farmers. 

Listen to a real journalist from The GrayZone, Max Blumenthal be interviewed by Russel Brand about the war in Ukraine and the killings that go on by the Ukrainian army against their own citizens.

Of course, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Tuesday, without producing evidence, that Russian missiles had hit Poland, a NATO country, in what he called a “significant escalation” of the conflict.

“Russian missiles hit Poland, the territory of our friendly country. People died,” Zelenskyy said in his nightly video address. However even Poland and the USA have claimed this to be false, yet still blaming Russia for the fact a NATO country was attacked by a non-NATO Ukraine.

Green Screen Zelenskyy - getting ready to make another speech from the frontline

Zelenskyy was calling for immediate Article 5 implementation of NATO's collective Defence policy, yet it was Ukraine a non-NATO member who had fired and killed Polish civilians, with no evidence provided for the reason that they fired their anti-missile batteries towards Poland. 

Was this a deliberate false-flag event to try and get NATO to come rushing to Ukraine's aid, as their foreign legion of ex US/UK forces, special forces, Polish soldiers, and ISIS and al-Qaeda terrorists, all wait for winter and the rolling out of half a million Russian troops?

Let's just re-cap the last 8 months and how far the west has fallen due to the most corrupt European nation being invaded by Russia.

• The loss of free speech online, anyone who goes against US/NATO narrative is labeled a Russian Agent or BOT and kicked off social media platforms, or even worse, put on that CIA/SBU assassination list.
• Social media virtue signalling without any knowledge of what they are supporting. The Ukrainian flags may tell others you support Ukraine, but what kind of Ukraine are you supporting? One that has kill lists that include journalists, NAZI's who use civilians as human shields as Amnesty International has reported?
• Allowing social media sites such as YouTube to show literal "snuff films", where Russian soldiers are shot and left to lie on the floor with bags over their heads as they die. Anti-Russian sentiments are allowed to be declared from every social media site but dare tell something that does not fit the "Ukraine is good, Russia is bad" narrative and you could see yourself cancelled. Is this free speech, is this giving the citizens all sides of the story so they can make their own minds up, or is it the Government pushing propaganda into our heads?
• MI6 & USA blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines, apparently during her short term as PM, all Liz Truss did was concentrate on Ukraine. It was her bugged iPhone, using Israeli Pegasus malware, that told the Russians the Brits had played apart in the terrorist attack on German & Russian infrastructure, helping to cause misery and suffering in the cold and much poorer houses of Europe this winter and drive Europe into the USA's hands for expensive energy needs as planned by this supposed RAND report, if it is fake then it was very good at foretelling the future.
• The self-inflicted economic disaster we have given ourselves. With no time to recover from COVID and supply line issues, we dived right in on the anti-Russian sanctions economic war which has only hurt us not Russia. The Russian Ruble is doing fine and we may feel all good about stopping cheap Russian gas flowing to us, as our energy bills rise along with inflation, but Russia is just doing more oil and gas deals with the rest of the world who have not voted against the Russian invasion. It is only NATO and the EU who have pegged their economies in a futile battle with Russia, sanction after sanction, and none of it has worked. It has only led to our massive cost of living crisis. Other countries like India have cut cheap gas deals with Russia for not voting against them in the UN, and other countries from South America, to China and the global South all see the hypocrisy in our moral crusade using very unmoral methods.
• We like to claim we have the moral high ground, and Russia is not following "The Rules Based Order" set up after WWII, which as this article states is basically 4 rules:
• America makes the rules.
• You will follow and obey American rules.
• You will not listen to the United Nations.
• If you fail to obey American demands, America reserves the right to obliterate you.
• Believe it or not but Russia has followed UN International law, in protecting citizens of an imminent attack. The Minsk accords which Russia was hoping would solve the issue of Russian speaker's rights in the Donbass without breaking up Ukraine were not kept by France, Germany, and Ukraine and instead used by NATO to build up the Ukrainian army to take back the Donbass and Crimea after the US-led Maidan coup in 2014. As you can read in my article from February 2022, nearly everything I predicted has come true. Russia and China have got very close, the Nord Stream 2 pipeline did not go ahead, and we are allowing ourselves to freeze only to say that we stand with Ukraine. This is whilst the US illegally occupies Syria's oil fields, helping themselves to their wheat and gas, hypocrisy or just the consequences of everyone following the "Rules Based Order". The Russians are following international law, the US only follows international law if it suits them, otherwise, it's their "Rules Based Order", that takes precedence. The rest of the world sees this hypocrisy, and it is why the BRICS nations are expanding, with Saudi Arabia looking to join which could mean the end of the Petrodollar dominance that has allowed the USA to print money like there is no tomorrow.
• Using ISIS and al-Qaeda terrorists, and paying them to fill the holes in the Ukrainian foreign legion. Are we now on the side of these terrorists? I thought they were our "mortal enemies", I know about Gladio 2, maybe you should read up on Gladio 1 and replace "fake Communists" with "fake terrorists". We supported them in Syria, and use them to cause chaos.
• Using terrorist tactics ourselves to kill or damage infrastructure such as the truck bomb/missile attack on the Crimean bridge. Did the driver of that van of fertiliser, making the truck one massive IRA-style bomb, know he was to become a suicide bomber?
• Supporting a country that may have killed innocent Polish farmers seeking to get NATO in on their war. Not only has Ukraine shown a lack of care for its own citizens with the "cleansings" that happen after every town they re-take, innocent civilians massacred, but they shelled a Russian POW camp hoping to kill their own men to stop the Russians from videoing their evidence. Attacking a nuclear power station with HIMARS and other artillery which could have led to a massive nuclear, Chornobyl-style disaster for Europe, oh and trying to blame their own attack on Poland on Russia to get NATO in even more on their side in the war.

Now, don't get me wrong, I am not Russian, I have no wish for Russia to take over the West, or want to see Russian war crimes committed, and I definitely do not want to see WWIII. 

However, I also don't want our economy to enter its biggest recession yet partly due to this conflict. I don't want high inflation, blackouts, and high energy costs, all due to a sanctions war, and turning away from cheap Russian gas which Europe's economy relies on. All this suffering in the West just so our leaders who can afford the price hikes, and high fuel bills, to virtue signal that we are behind Ukraine all the way.

However, it is war and I believe that just as Ukraine has committed war crimes by using citizens as human shields as outlined in the Amnesty International Human Rights report on tactics used in this conflict, which stated "Ukrainian forces have put civilians in harm’s way by establishing bases and operating weapons systems in populated residential areas, including in schools and hospitals", I am sure Russia has committed them too. 

In the fog of war, where we are prevented from making our own minds up, and pushed propaganda from all angles. Most of us dare not think for ourselves for fear of being labelled "pro-Russian". It seems morality is definitely relative during war time, for anyone doing a philosophy course.

For independent journalists and bloggers, singers and ex-politicians or US military who dare to state historical facts, such as the current war actually started in 2014, and that Ukraine was killing their own citizens in the Donbass as NATO trained their army for a war with Russia. Then as independent thinkers, we are put on CIA kill lists.

Is that what we now stand for?

By Dark Politricks

© 2022 Dark Politricks