Russia Links Crocus Terrorists To Ukrainian Funding Source
By Dark Politricks
A report by Russian investigators has confirmed payment from Ukraine in cryptocurrency from the perpetrators of the terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall in Moscow.
Scott Ritter, a former Iraqi UN arms Inspector who tried to stop the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003 has said publicly that the attack does not look like an ISIS style attack, and the fact that the attackers planned on escaping alive to Ukraine rather than dying like martyrs is a sign that it was a cover for the Tajik hitmen who were seemingly hired over Telegram by Ukrainian special forces.
With the West so eager to claim that Ukraine was not behind the attack just minutes after the concert hall attack one must ask how did they know when the perpetrators had not even been caught and interrogated at that time.
That alone and the pre-warning to US citizens to stay away from public spaces specifically "Music Concerts", yet no back-channel communication to Russia about how they knew of the attack and providing evidence of foreknowledge is enough to leave the Western intelligence agencies such as the CIA and MI6 on a list of possible suspects.
It seems that because Ukraine can no longer fight the Russian advance directly due to the majority of it's NATO supplied tanks and missile defence systems having been destroyed as well as estimates ranging from 400,000 to 1,000,000 million dead soldiers, they are now resorting to terrorist tactics inside Russia.
From this video, you can see that the state is happily sending school kids off to the front lines to fulfil the USA's wish to fight Russia down to the last Ukrainian, whether this means losing a whole generation of citizens from the very young, to the very old.
It seems that as Russia has already destroyed Ukraine's NATO-trained first two Armies it is now unfortunately tasked to destroy an army of students and press-ganged people dragged from their homes or off the street.
The world does not realise that the situation here is as dangerous as the Cuban missile crisis, but even more so due to the size of the nuclear bombs now being used by each side.
However it seems the roles are reversed though, and if Putin is JFK there is no one home at the White House to play Khrushchev and come to the negotiating table which Russia has been wanting to do ever since it first negotiated a peace settlement in the early stages of the war in Belarus and then Turkey.
The Ukrainian negotiator who initialled the peace deal ready for Zelenskyy to sign has been publicly speaking about the deal and wonders why it is was never fully signed.
Here, Ray McGovern, ex CIA, and a member of a Security Analysts for Sanity group that tries to bring some balance to this mad world, with other ex-US intelligence and military members like Scott Ritter, gives an interesting view often dismissed by Western news services.
In this video he talks about how there was a peace agreement, how Russia pulled its long line of tanks pointing towards Kyiv out as a sign of good faith so that negotiations could go forward, and how Boris Johnson was sent to Zelenskyy to tell him not to proceed.
It seems that Zelenskyy made a Faustian bargain with NATO in that they would give him milirtay aid, pay for his whole government's wages and pensions using money from Western tax payers, and and continue until the last Ukrainian.
Let's just hope that any terrorism in Russia that has been initiated by the NATO-backed Ukraine, and especially the CIA and MI6, has not put paid to any hopes of a peace settlement.
If someone with a modicum of sense on the Ukrainian side wants to negotiate peace, let's hope the Crocus massacre of kids at a music concert is not the end of any chance to resolve this war without Russia having to kill all these poor Ukrainian kids sent to the front lines.
The massacre is not something I would wish to have my country's hands involved in, and if they have been covertly supporting terrorist groups to attack the Russian capital, then I hope Russia keeps the level of patience and calm it has done so far, and is still willing to talk peace.
Russia Can Be Bad, And At The Same Time, NATO Can Be At Fault For Crossing Russia's Red Lines
By Dark Politricks
I know in the West at the moment it is a hard thing to accept, that we may be at some fault for the crisis Ukraine is currently in, however, 2 things can be right at the same time.
1. Putin is wrong for invading Ukraine,
and;
2. We hold some responsibility for ignoring all the warning signs, crossing Putin's red lines, and using Ukraine as a way to toy with Putin's paranoia of being attacked once again from the West.
Whilst people can rightly say Russia is doing a bad thing by invading a sovereign country, it can also be said at the same time, that despite Russia warning us over and over again that NATO was crossing their red lines, we kept on doing so, ignoring Putin's words.
So, one can imagine how angry the Russians must be with the current situation, having NATO bases all around them, with so many Western leaders breaking that promise not to expand, and facing the threat of Ukraine, the ex-Soviet Republic, joining NATO and having nuclear weapons on their border facing directly at them.
One must ask the obvious question. Why is it that the US thinks that it is so "exceptional", that it can impose its will through International bodies, banks, and its military on other countries?
It invades them under false pretenses, with fake claims of "spreading democracy", or "Human Rights Abuses", and to those, it cannot invade, it imposes sanctions. But when have sanctions ever worked.Have they worked with North Korea or Iran?
No they have only emboldened them and allowed their leaders to point to the West and say "We are not the problem, it is the evil West that is trying to destroy us".
Did sanctions work in Syria or Iraq, no, they only led to the starvation deaths of half a million Iraqi babies due to not enough milk being available. Something Madeleine Albright says in this interview that she thought "it was a price worth paying".
Half a million kids dead, on the USA's conscience, how can they continue to apply these measures knowing that they are not effective and only lead to the suffering of ordinary people?
So why is that the US and it's allies in the #AxisOfWar feel such a moral superiority when in fact they have spent the last 100+ years installing Right-Wing dictators and overthrowing left-wing governments all over the globe, and causing millions of deaths and executions from their US-trained death squads at the School of the Americas. In fact when you look at all the wars started since 1945, the majority, a huge 81% has been by the USA.
Now can you not see how aggrieved Russia must be to have been lied to in such a way, and for NATO to keep on pushing that Russian red-line, using Ukraine as a way to wind up Putin by offering them NATO membership but never actually doing so.
How would Russia know if they would actually follow through on their promises?
Just as Obama had red lines in Syria, Putin has his own red lines. Why is it okay for the US to set down red lines and then act on them but not Russia?
This US news piece from the HILL has some nice inserts into it from lectures done years ago, all saying the same thing.
That if NATO carries on the way it is doing with Ukraine, that country is going to end up wrecked.
A very large degree of hypocrisy lies at the middle of the Ukraine crisis and it is the Ukrainian state that is suffering from NATO and the US toying with it.
The Maidan coup in 2014 was Obama's fault, Biden was his VP at the time, so right in the middle of it all, and he should feel some responsibility for overthrowing their existing leader and installing a far-right NAZI in power.
This was a western puppet who was only too happy to send neo-NAZI thugs and military off to the East to commit war crimes against the Russian speaking people of the Donbass. They have been in a civil war for 8 years now. Not a single home exists in the east of Ukraine which doesn't have a bullet hole or mortar shell hole in it somewhere. You can read the history that led us to this point in an earlier article of mine > The Propaganda War Has Started.
Frequent heavy shelling by the western forces and far-right militias have seen many towns in the breakaway republics reduced to rubble, with schools and even kindergartens struck by rockets, sometimes deliberately, such as this one in the settlement of Stanytsia Luhanska.
Therefore if Ukraine is not going to remove the NAZI element deep in the heart of it then someone needs to.
Putin's solution to the NAZIs on hs border, killing Russians in the Donbass, maybe going too far, and he maybe using it as an excuse to justify what he really believes, which is that Ukraine does not have a right to exist as an independent nation apart from Russia.
However, any de-NAZIFICATION has to be good, and despite numerous fantastical stories of Ukrainian fights to the death, or the computer-generated fighter pilot known as the Ghost of Kyiv who apparently shot down 8 Russian planes in one day, his troops have actually been found to be quite restrained in some places during the invasion.
Whereas Ukrainian propaganda like the tale of the men on the Snake Island 13, fighting to their deaths, in reality, the Russian ship, let the 82 (not 13) men board, gave them food and water and dropped them off so they could go home to their families. The Ukrainians even said that if the Russians wanted to bury them they could have but instead they helped them get home safely.
Does that sound like a cold bloodied murdering army on a random killing spree?
This video links a few of the pro-Ukrainian propaganda stories together to dispel them, and as you can see from the links, not only US but UK and European and Ukrainian media outlets all repeated the propaganda hook line and sinker without any actual investigation.
It is the lazy news gathering and then repeating of, that makes us look foolish as well as liars in the face of the world when we keep crying wolf only to find out the wolf actually protected the sheep.
Why is it that the USA would never ever allow Russia to put arms, and soldiers on their borders say in Mexico and Canada, but it's okay for them to do the same to Russia?
Shouldn't the same rules apply to all nations of the world?
It shouldn't be a case of what the US and NATO does is right 100% of the time, and what Russia does is always wrong. We must find some balance here and the NATO actions of putting weapons in Poland, breaking treaties and claiming the missiles were to stop any attack from Iran, rather than as offensive weapons for targeting Russia was ridiculous, and probably only increased Putin's paranoia that NATO was trying to surround him, which they have.
I am not saying the result is good, just that we must bear some responsibility for it. As we hurl sanction upon sanction and use words such as "We are going to crush Russia's economy with Sanctions", we are very close to crossing another of Putin's red lines, attacking him personally.
Russia currently has the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons with 8,4000 and a section of its nuclear doctrine allows for use of the weapons if there is a vague suggestion of a threat. Vladimir Putin has also carried out 2 nuclear attack drills since becoming President again in 2012. When was the last time a Western nation held such a massive attempt to prepare us for nuclear war?
I also want to remind you of the "Dead Hand Switch". During the Cold War, due to fears of a successful first strike from US nuclear submarines Russia created a fail-safe device for their nuclear weapons arsenal to ensure a second-strike capability even if all command and control were to be destroyed. The system (code-named Dead Hand) utilized seismic, light, radioactivity, and pressure sensors to detect an incoming nuclear attack and retaliate if necessary.
The best part? The system is almost certainly still operational, even if the first strike by NATO is successful all Russian ballistic missiles will automatically be fired towards their intended targets leading to world annihilation.
Let's just hope cooler heads are being used and not the US MIC pushing for a "no fly zone" which would obviously lead to escalation if a US plane shot down a Russian one.
We must realise that not only has Putin made a drastic mistake in invading Ukraine, but that we also hold some responsibility for ignoring all the speeches, talks and declarations Putin had made over the years regarding Russia's red lines which included NO NATO in Ukraine.
We must be grown up enough to realise that a lot of the world, including the 2 biggest populations in India and China who refused to condemn Russia at a UN meeting feel that the US is being very hypocritical when they go around invading nations with no realisation that other countries see their acts on the same level as we are now treating Putin and Russia for invading Ukraine.
What is security for one nation, must be security for another. We cannot cross other nations red lines and at the same time expect everyone else to never cross our own. What is good for the goose is good for the gander and two things can be right at the same time.
1. Putin shouldn't have invaded Ukraine. All war should be illegal unless a UN security council resolution allows for it. We all went to war in WWII to fight NAZISM, Putin claims to want to de-NAZIFY Ukraine. Ukraine admittedly has NAZI groups that have been fighting in the Donbass and a number of war crimes can be attributed to them.
Whether this is an excuse or not, Nazis should be cleansed from every country, however, Russia invading Ukraine was not the right move. The Minsk accords which have been ignored by Ukraine and the West were the path to peace, yet we squandered that approach and now we have this mess on out hands.
2. NATO and the West have been pushing Putin towards this point with all their meddling in Ukraine, coups, and broken promises of joining NATO, but still arming them and training them and of course lying to Mikel Gorbachev about the expansion of NATO which is right up on Russia's front door now.NATO was supposed to be a Cold War alliance, so why does it still exist, if not for Russia?
Maybe some politicians can be wise enough to see that both of these can be true at the same time, and cool down on the rhetoric of "destroying Russia through sanctions", as that is only going to inflame the one nation I know of that has carried out regular nuclear attack civil drills with up to 40 million civilians involved.
Have you had a drill in your country lately? Do you wonder why Russia has had these drills, and if not shouldn't you?
