More USA Presidential Madness 2024?

Another US Presidential Election - Nothing Will Change - Again!

By Dark Politricks

Here comes another US Presidential election and another mess for the rest of the world to look to and ask itself:

"Is this really Democracy?"

I think many countries, especially the few left who have any real belief in the US as a "beacon of freedom", will be answering in the negative. Those who know better, or act with the US as cohorts, such as the EU, will keep quiet and pretend the great experiment in "liberty and natural born human rights" created in1776's is continuing.

Those who have been tampered with through US bribery, coups, unfair economic tariffs or sanctions, will again see that the American's cry of "US Freedom and Democracy" that the USA believes is the ideal way to force run other societies, is a lie inside it's own borders.

Nothing will happen to better or change the lives for the average US citizen whoever gets into power. Everyone with half a brain knows the real reigns of power are not controlled by the President or Vice President. 

If that were true, Kamala Harris would be acting as the President now. Also all the "new policies" she claims to want to implement elected, if Joe Biden is so unfit to run for another term, she could do so. Also the second cabinet meeting of 2024, only held a couple of weeks ago, would not have been chaired by Joe's wife! 

Whoever thought that showing the start of that meeting on public air waves did a severe disservice to anyone with any remaining thoughts that the US elected politicians wielded any real power. They obviously don't if Joe or his wife can run the executive branch of US government.

No one in the world will feel much difference when the Deep State gains further power through the election of supposedly populist Donald Trump, or the blackwashed Kamala Harris. 

The powers that stay hidden seem to be backing the blackwashed, grand daughter of Irish slave traders, who according to some has been faking a history so murky it compares to the claims made by Trump back when Obama was running first for President. When Obama's birth certificate and Kenyan heritage, was big news, along with a possible passport issued by the British Empire. 

This is something that would have made him illegitimate under US law to hold the highest office in the land. It's probably the same as someone coming from the ex British Crown colony of Jamacia, now in the British Commonwealth. Here is a look into the Democratic nominee for Presidents history, and her family background that she seems to be hiding the truth about.

Candace Owens Looks Into The Blackwashing of Kamala Harris

However, to the real rulers of power it makes little difference who they place in the public facing office. A political patsie to take all the flack the masses may throw at them for the failure of the government to actually do anything to help the people of the country, rather than their donors, the MIC and Big Business. 

Those voters actually taking time off work to vote, might think it actually makes a difference what choice they make. Maybe some know that if the Empire wanted to, their swipe on an electronic voting machine could easily be switched in a second to their opponent. It doesn't take Russia to do the hacking, but it helps that they or Iran could be blamed for doing so.

I think it has been clear for years, and with every years Las Vegas Def Con Voting Village competition, even kids are now able to hack the latest voting machines. Therefore it makes it little more than a trivial event for those behind the scenes to switch the voting tally if they cared to do so. Those millions who will vote, will all no doubt make claims of another  "stolen election", if their candidate doesn't win.

I still cannot get over the hypocrisy of the Democrats who moaned so much about Trumps dislike of the way the 2020 COVID election was handled. This was when due to the plandemic, votes could just be dropped off in mailboxes with no security to manage or control the access to these important boxes. His claims of foul play were just dismissed as the cries of a bitter loser who wanted to steal the election and other-throw the government.

However, people seem to forget that in 2016, when Trump won, the Democrats made the same claims about a stolen election. Hillary Clinton (who had told Trump to run for office believing him to be an easier contender to beat), was so bemused and angry over her loss to Trump, that she made up a whole 4 year news cycle of lies and distortions that became the infamous and now debunked Russigate hoax.

The Democrats definitely cried foul, and their lackies in the MSM touted as gospel, with nightly bombshell reports from Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, about Russia collusion that all turned out to be false. If there was any real proof that Russia had an agent running as the US POTUS then I think there would have been more than a failed attempt at impeachment. 

No there was nothing to see there in 2016, when the FBI raided an office to find out that Clintons DNC interns used to destroy her old phones and Blackberry devices with hammers. Also, that she was running illegal private servers from her home basement, with unsecured messaging between her and other DNC apparatchiks, using her own personal email accounts. 

Although many were destroyed, others were leaked. Most famously the Podesta emails probably sent to WikiLeaks by DNC staffer Seth Rich, who died in a "botched robbery", in which nothing was stolen, and the MSM covered it up as a right wing conspiracy. They just added it to their Russia is to blame for Trump being elected delusion, and their incorrect conclusion that Trump had somehow robbed her of that 2016 election. 

The botched robbery maybe true, and maybe Russia hacked the DNC then passed the info along to WikiLeaks. Thousands of GB slowly trickling out of the servers without being noticed. Or maybe someone working there just downloaded them and passed them along on a USB drive. 

It would have been a lot simpler to do, and much easier to disguise, unless he was found out of course. Of course it is just conspiracy theorists who suggest that Seth Rich was just another name for the list of the unexplained and mysterious deaths that seem to follow the Clinton family around over the decades.

It seems though that whoever wins the election for the world to clap their hands at and marvel at the "greatest nation on earth" and their Democratic Process, that the fate of the world hangs in the balance whoever becomes the outward face, whether pretending to be someone they are not, or just beholden to foreign interests. 

Either compromised through blackmail at an Epstein or P Diddler party, or just beholden to AIPAC or other big money interests seemingly needed by most politicians to run for President or the Senate/Congress.

The Deep State obviously thinks Trump is a risk to the flow of money to Ukraine, and the filling of MIC coffers which has already seen multiple attempts on his life. Something already being memory holed by the left leaning media, which is enough to raise suspicion on it's own, whatever the failures, accidental or deliberate by those supposed to be protecting him. 

The MSM is also trying to spin it in case of a successful hit or even not, that Iranian hitmen are all about, and that they are behind the attempts on his life, despite the attempted assassins links to the intelligence services.

It does seem to be a bit of a coincidence with all the strife in the Middle East at the moment, with Israel trying to drag the US into it's regional war, that Iran is all over the papers about plots to kill Trump.  

However, Trump seems to believe in these claims that it's Iran trying to kill him not Deep State trained nutjobs, that the MIC are using as Patsies. I don't doubt he will go after Iran and back Israel up in their regional war, whether or not he helps close down the Ukrainian threat to global stability and real and potential nuclear conflict with Russia.

Putin only just changed their nuclear doctrine on September 25, 2024. This now means that Russia will view any assault on it supported by a nuclear power as a joint attack, justifying a nuclear response. 

It knows that it is US/UK/NATO troops not Ukrainians, that load in the secure satellite based targeting data needed for long range attacks into it's country, and it will declare war on those countries if attacked by Storm Shadows or ATACM missiles. 

This stopped the recent announcement of such a move by UK's PM Sir Kier Starmer and President Biden on a recent visit to Washington due suspected back channel threats by Russia that they were not bluffing, giving a list of targets they would strike if attacked in such a manner.

So whoever becomes the face of the next US government, we can be assured of more US aggression whether its is in Ukraine, or the Middle East. 

The MIC and Deep State are not going to let the people of the USA have a real voice at the ballot box.  

All that matters is the money those companies like Raytheon and BAe pump in to support Presidential candidates, and paying them back in the best way they know how; 

Constant war.

By Dark Politricks

© 2024 Dark Politricks

Two Things Can Be Right At The Same Time

Russia Can Be Bad, And At The Same Time, NATO Can Be At Fault For Crossing Russia's Red Lines

By Dark Politricks

I know in the West at the moment it is a hard thing to accept, that we may be at some fault for the crisis Ukraine is currently in, however, 2 things can be right at the same time. 

1. Putin is wrong for invading Ukraine, 

and; 

2. We hold some responsibility for ignoring all the warning signs, crossing Putin's red lines, and using Ukraine as a way to toy with Putin's paranoia of being attacked once again from the West.

Whilst people can rightly say Russia is doing a bad thing by invading a sovereign country, it can also be said at the same time, that despite Russia warning us over and over again that NATO was crossing their red lines, we kept on doing so, ignoring Putin's words.

NATO kept pushing eastwards, despite all the promises they had given Mikel Gorbachev in 1990, that they would not move an inch Eastwards. This was not by one person, but heads of state from the US, UK, France and Germany and the heads of NATO and UN at the time.

So, one can imagine how angry the Russians must be with the current situation, having NATO bases all around them, with so many Western leaders breaking that promise not to expand, and facing the threat of Ukraine, the ex-Soviet Republic, joining NATO and having nuclear weapons on their border facing directly at them.

One must ask the obvious question. Why is it that the US thinks that it is so "exceptional", that it can impose its will through International bodies, banks, and its military on other countries?

It invades them under false pretenses, with fake claims of "spreading democracy", or "Human Rights Abuses", and to those, it cannot invade, it imposes sanctions. But when have sanctions ever worked. Have they worked with North Korea or Iran? 

No they have only emboldened them and allowed their leaders to point to the West and say "We are not the problem, it is the evil West that is trying to destroy us".

Did sanctions work in Syria or Iraq, no, they only led to the starvation deaths of half a million Iraqi babies due to not enough milk being available. Something Madeleine Albright says in this interview that she thought "it was a price worth paying". 

Half a million kids dead, on the USA's conscience, how can they continue to apply these measures knowing that they are not effective and only lead to the suffering of ordinary people?

 

So why is that the US and it's allies in the #AxisOfWar feel such a moral superiority when in fact they have spent the last 100+ years installing Right-Wing dictators and overthrowing left-wing governments all over the globe, and causing millions of deaths and executions from their US-trained death squads at the School of the Americas. In fact when you look at all the wars started since 1945, the majority, a huge 81% has been by the USA.

Now can you not see how aggrieved Russia must be to have been lied to in such a way, and for NATO to keep on pushing that Russian red-line, using Ukraine as a way to wind up Putin by offering them NATO membership but never actually doing so. 

How would Russia know if they would actually follow through on their promises?

Just as Obama had red lines in Syria, Putin has his own red lines. Why is it okay for the US to set down red lines and then act on them but not Russia? 

This US news piece from the HILL has some nice inserts into it from lectures done years ago, all saying the same thing. 

That if NATO carries on the way it is doing with Ukraine, that country is going to end up wrecked.

A very large degree of hypocrisy lies at the middle of the Ukraine crisis and it is the Ukrainian state that is suffering from NATO and the US toying with it. 

The Maidan coup in 2014 was Obama's fault, Biden was his VP at the time, so right in the middle of it all, and he should feel some responsibility for overthrowing their existing leader and installing a far-right NAZI in power.

This was a western puppet who was only too happy to send neo-NAZI thugs and military off to the East to commit war crimes against the Russian speaking people of the Donbass. They have been in a civil war for 8 years now. Not a single home exists in the east of Ukraine which doesn't have a bullet hole or mortar shell hole in it somewhere. You can read the history that led us to this point in an earlier article of mine > The Propaganda War Has Started.

Frequent heavy shelling by the western forces and far-right militias have seen many towns in the breakaway republics reduced to rubble, with schools and even kindergartens struck by rockets, sometimes deliberately, such as this one in the settlement of Stanytsia Luhanska.

So when Putin says his aim is to de-NAZIFY the country, Ukraine does have a far-right movement, and its armed defenders include the Azov battalion, a far-right nationalist militia group

which has been named as one of the groups who have caused many atrocities out in the East of Ukraine. 

This needs to be understood. Just because the current Ukrainian President is Jewish, has no relation on the importance that the NAZI element plays in the country, stretching all the way back to World War II.

Therefore if Ukraine is not going to remove the NAZI element deep in the heart of it then someone needs to. 

Putin's solution to the NAZIs on hs border, killing Russians in the Donbass, maybe going too far, and he maybe using it as an excuse to justify what he really believes, which is that Ukraine does not have a right to exist as an independent nation apart from Russia. 

However, any de-NAZIFICATION has to be good, and despite numerous fantastical stories of Ukrainian fights to the death, or the computer-generated fighter pilot known as the Ghost of Kyiv who apparently shot down 8 Russian planes in one day, his troops have actually been found to be quite restrained in some places during the invasion. 

Whereas Ukrainian propaganda like the tale of the men on the Snake Island 13, fighting to their deaths, in reality, the Russian ship, let the 82 (not 13) men board, gave them food and water and dropped them off so they could go home to their families. The Ukrainians even said that if the Russians wanted to bury them they could have but instead they helped them get home safely. 

Does that sound like a cold bloodied murdering army on a random killing spree?

This video links a few of the pro-Ukrainian propaganda stories together to dispel them, and as you can see from the links, not only US but UK and European and Ukrainian media outlets all repeated the propaganda hook line and sinker without any actual investigation. 

It is the lazy news gathering and then repeating of, that makes us look foolish as well as liars in the face of the world when we keep crying wolf only to find out the wolf actually protected the sheep. 

Now I am not saying that there hasn't been instances where Russian have killed civilians or used illegal munitions, but then so did the USA in their illegal invasion of Iraq, and their literal tearing down of Fallujah using white phosphorus, and uranium tipped arms, which caused a massive spike in birth defects from those affected by the weapons.

Why is it that the USA would never ever allow Russia to put arms, and soldiers on their borders say in Mexico and Canada, but it's okay for them to do the same to Russia? 

Shouldn't the same rules apply to all nations of the world? 

It shouldn't be a case of what the US and NATO does is right 100% of the time, and what Russia does is always wrong. We must find some balance here and the NATO actions of putting weapons in Poland, breaking treaties and claiming the missiles were to stop any attack from Iran, rather than as offensive weapons for targeting Russia was ridiculous, and probably only increased Putin's paranoia that NATO was trying to surround him, which they have.

Russia must be given some guarantees of their safety, and the west has used Ukraine as a way of forcing Putin's hand. He warned many times that arming Ukraine, or letting it join NATO would be a step too far yet we didn't listen to him. This is the result.

I am not saying the result is good, just that we must bear some responsibility for it. As we hurl sanction upon sanction and use words such as "We are going to crush Russia's economy with Sanctions", we are very close to crossing another of Putin's red lines, attacking him personally.

Vladimir Putin. has already rolled out the nuclear missiles and put Russia’s nuclear deterrent forces on high alert to remind us all that he has more, and bigger nukes than the USA, and today Russia’s foreign minister Sergei Lavrov has warned a third World War would be ‘nuclear and destructive’.

Do we really want to push the Russians so far into a corner that they feel the only way out is a nuclear war?

I must remind you all that only a few years ago in 2016, Russia held a massive nuclear attack war exercise involving more than 40 million people and 200,000 emergency services personnel and soldiers during a massive civil defence exercise.

Russia currently has the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons with 8,4000 and a section of its nuclear doctrine allows for use of the weapons if there is a vague suggestion of a threat. Vladimir Putin has also carried out 2 nuclear attack drills since becoming President again in 2012. When was the last time a Western nation held such a massive attempt to prepare us for nuclear war?

I also want to remind you of the "Dead Hand Switch". During the Cold War, due to fears of a successful first strike from US nuclear submarines Russia created a fail-safe device for their nuclear weapons arsenal to ensure a second-strike capability even if all command and control were to be destroyed. The system (code-named Dead Hand) utilized seismic, light, radioactivity, and pressure sensors to detect an incoming nuclear attack and retaliate if necessary. 

The best part? The system is almost certainly still operational, even if the first strike by NATO is successful all Russian ballistic missiles will automatically be fired towards their intended targets leading to world annihilation. 

Let's just hope cooler heads are being used and not the US MIC pushing for a "no fly zone" which would obviously lead to escalation if a US plane shot down a Russian one. 

We must realise that not only has Putin made a drastic mistake in invading Ukraine, but that we also hold some responsibility for ignoring all the speeches, talks and declarations Putin had made over the years regarding Russia's red lines which included NO NATO in Ukraine. 

We must be grown up enough to realise that a lot of the world, including the 2 biggest populations in India and China who refused to condemn Russia at a UN meeting feel that the US is being very hypocritical when they go around invading nations with no realisation that other countries see their acts on the same level as we are now treating Putin and Russia for invading Ukraine.

What is security for one nation, must be security for another. We cannot cross other nations red lines and at the same time expect everyone else to never cross our own. What is good for the goose is good for the gander and two things can be right at the same time.

1. Putin shouldn't have invaded Ukraine. All war should be illegal unless a UN security council resolution allows for it. We all went to war in WWII to fight NAZISM, Putin claims to want to de-NAZIFY Ukraine. Ukraine admittedly has NAZI groups that have been fighting in the Donbass and a number of war crimes can be attributed to them. 

Whether this is an excuse or not, Nazis should be cleansed from every country, however, Russia invading Ukraine was not the right move. The Minsk accords which have been ignored by Ukraine and the West were the path to peace, yet we squandered that approach and now we have this mess on out hands.

2. NATO and the West have been pushing Putin towards this point with all their meddling in Ukraine, coups, and broken promises of joining NATO, but still arming them and training them and of course lying to Mikel Gorbachev about the expansion of NATO which is right up on Russia's front door now. NATO was supposed to be a Cold War alliance, so why does it still exist, if not for Russia?

Maybe some politicians can be wise enough to see that both of these can be true at the same time, and cool down on the rhetoric of "destroying Russia through sanctions", as that is only going to inflame the one nation I know of that has carried out regular nuclear attack civil drills with up to 40 million civilians involved. 

Have you had a drill in your country lately? Do you wonder why Russia has had these drills, and if not shouldn't you?

By Dark Politricks

© 2022 Dark Politricks

Russia could over run NATO forces in Europe within an hour

Russia could over run NATO forces in Europe within an hour

By Dark Politricks

Don't be scared but Russia could overrun the eastern European NATO forces within an hour and then be heading to Paris like Hitler on a tank within a day.

Even the US admit this.

So please let's not start a nuclear war with Russia over Syria?

Especially seeing on this occasion they are on the right side, fighting terrorists, stopping ISIL funding by destroying stolen oil being delivered to the corrupt Turkish regime and NATO ally, and giving the US a chance to pretend to have split the "moderate" anti-Assad forces (as if there are any), from the hardcore al-Nusra, Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, al-Qaeda, ISIL groups.

However after extensive studies they found they only had 4 or 5 moderate anti Assad rebels trained up to fight.

Really that shouldn't take a lot of sorting out then really.

However in this different video its gone up to 10. Still not that hard to separate from the nutters?

It looks like we have a lot of moderate rebels to use against Assad doesn't it. No wonder the Axis of War carries on supporting ISIL as they are the only game in town for them.

It's getting very crowded in the Med with a Russian fleet and US, UK, French and Israeli ships all firing missiles into Syria.

Surely this madness has to stop soon before WWIII breaks out.



You know the terrorists we told where to attack a load of Syrian and Russian troops the other year and killed over 60 of them.....ooops sorry, we said, as Russia shot missiles straight into our base of operations killing US, UK, Mossad and other ISIL collaborators with them,

Things are getting dangerous out there.


View the original article on www.darkpolitricks.com.

By Dark Politricks


© 2016 Dark Politricks

Russia could over run NATO forces in Europe within an hour

Russia could over run NATO forces in Europe within an hour

By Dark Politricks

Hey everybody, don't be scared but Russia could overrun the eastern European NATO forces within an hour and then be heading to Paris like Hitler on a tank within a day.

Even the US admit this.

So please not start a nuclear war with Rusia over Syria?

Especially seeing on this occasion they are on the right side, fighting terrorists, stopping ISIL funding by destroying stolen oil being delivered to the corrupt Turkish regime and NATO ally, and giving the US a chance to pretend to have split the "moderate" anti-Assad forces (as if there are any), from the hardcore al-Nusra, Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, al-Qaeda, ISIL groups.

However after extensive studies they found they only had 4 or 5 moderate anti Assad rebels trained up to fight.

Really that shouldn't take a lot of sorting out then really.

However in this different video its gone up to 10. Still not that hard to separate from the nutters?

It looks like we have a lot of moderate rebels to use against Assad doesn't it. No wonder we carry on supporting ISIL as they are the only game in town.


You know the terrorists we told where to attack a load of Syrian and Russian troops last week and killed over 60 of them.....ooops sorry, we said, as Russia shot missiles straight into our base of operations killing US, UK, Mossad and other ISIL collaborators with them,

Things are getting murky.

 


View the original article on www.darkpolitricks.com.

By Dark Politricks


© 2016 Dark Politricks