More USA Presidential Madness 2024?

Another US Presidential Election - Nothing Will Change - Again!

By Dark Politricks

Here comes another US Presidential election and another mess for the rest of the world to look to and ask itself:

"Is this really Democracy?"

I think many countries, especially the few left who have any real belief in the US as a "beacon of freedom", will be answering in the negative. Those who know better, or act with the US as cohorts, such as the EU, will keep quiet and pretend the great experiment in "liberty and natural born human rights" created in1776's is continuing.

Those who have been tampered with through US bribery, coups, unfair economic tariffs or sanctions, will again see that the American's cry of "US Freedom and Democracy" that the USA believes is the ideal way to force run other societies, is a lie inside it's own borders.

Nothing will happen to better or change the lives for the average US citizen whoever gets into power. Everyone with half a brain knows the real reigns of power are not controlled by the President or Vice President. 

If that were true, Kamala Harris would be acting as the President now. Also all the "new policies" she claims to want to implement elected, if Joe Biden is so unfit to run for another term, she could do so. Also the second cabinet meeting of 2024, only held a couple of weeks ago, would not have been chaired by Joe's wife! 

Whoever thought that showing the start of that meeting on public air waves did a severe disservice to anyone with any remaining thoughts that the US elected politicians wielded any real power. They obviously don't if Joe or his wife can run the executive branch of US government.

No one in the world will feel much difference when the Deep State gains further power through the election of supposedly populist Donald Trump, or the blackwashed Kamala Harris. 

The powers that stay hidden seem to be backing the blackwashed, grand daughter of Irish slave traders, who according to some has been faking a history so murky it compares to the claims made by Trump back when Obama was running first for President. When Obama's birth certificate and Kenyan heritage, was big news, along with a possible passport issued by the British Empire. 

This is something that would have made him illegitimate under US law to hold the highest office in the land. It's probably the same as someone coming from the ex British Crown colony of Jamacia, now in the British Commonwealth. Here is a look into the Democratic nominee for Presidents history, and her family background that she seems to be hiding the truth about.

Candace Owens Looks Into The Blackwashing of Kamala Harris

However, to the real rulers of power it makes little difference who they place in the public facing office. A political patsie to take all the flack the masses may throw at them for the failure of the government to actually do anything to help the people of the country, rather than their donors, the MIC and Big Business. 

Those voters actually taking time off work to vote, might think it actually makes a difference what choice they make. Maybe some know that if the Empire wanted to, their swipe on an electronic voting machine could easily be switched in a second to their opponent. It doesn't take Russia to do the hacking, but it helps that they or Iran could be blamed for doing so.

I think it has been clear for years, and with every years Las Vegas Def Con Voting Village competition, even kids are now able to hack the latest voting machines. Therefore it makes it little more than a trivial event for those behind the scenes to switch the voting tally if they cared to do so. Those millions who will vote, will all no doubt make claims of another  "stolen election", if their candidate doesn't win.

I still cannot get over the hypocrisy of the Democrats who moaned so much about Trumps dislike of the way the 2020 COVID election was handled. This was when due to the plandemic, votes could just be dropped off in mailboxes with no security to manage or control the access to these important boxes. His claims of foul play were just dismissed as the cries of a bitter loser who wanted to steal the election and other-throw the government.

However, people seem to forget that in 2016, when Trump won, the Democrats made the same claims about a stolen election. Hillary Clinton (who had told Trump to run for office believing him to be an easier contender to beat), was so bemused and angry over her loss to Trump, that she made up a whole 4 year news cycle of lies and distortions that became the infamous and now debunked Russigate hoax.

The Democrats definitely cried foul, and their lackies in the MSM touted as gospel, with nightly bombshell reports from Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, about Russia collusion that all turned out to be false. If there was any real proof that Russia had an agent running as the US POTUS then I think there would have been more than a failed attempt at impeachment. 

No there was nothing to see there in 2016, when the FBI raided an office to find out that Clintons DNC interns used to destroy her old phones and Blackberry devices with hammers. Also, that she was running illegal private servers from her home basement, with unsecured messaging between her and other DNC apparatchiks, using her own personal email accounts. 

Although many were destroyed, others were leaked. Most famously the Podesta emails probably sent to WikiLeaks by DNC staffer Seth Rich, who died in a "botched robbery", in which nothing was stolen, and the MSM covered it up as a right wing conspiracy. They just added it to their Russia is to blame for Trump being elected delusion, and their incorrect conclusion that Trump had somehow robbed her of that 2016 election. 

The botched robbery maybe true, and maybe Russia hacked the DNC then passed the info along to WikiLeaks. Thousands of GB slowly trickling out of the servers without being noticed. Or maybe someone working there just downloaded them and passed them along on a USB drive. 

It would have been a lot simpler to do, and much easier to disguise, unless he was found out of course. Of course it is just conspiracy theorists who suggest that Seth Rich was just another name for the list of the unexplained and mysterious deaths that seem to follow the Clinton family around over the decades.

It seems though that whoever wins the election for the world to clap their hands at and marvel at the "greatest nation on earth" and their Democratic Process, that the fate of the world hangs in the balance whoever becomes the outward face, whether pretending to be someone they are not, or just beholden to foreign interests. 

Either compromised through blackmail at an Epstein or P Diddler party, or just beholden to AIPAC or other big money interests seemingly needed by most politicians to run for President or the Senate/Congress.

The Deep State obviously thinks Trump is a risk to the flow of money to Ukraine, and the filling of MIC coffers which has already seen multiple attempts on his life. Something already being memory holed by the left leaning media, which is enough to raise suspicion on it's own, whatever the failures, accidental or deliberate by those supposed to be protecting him. 

The MSM is also trying to spin it in case of a successful hit or even not, that Iranian hitmen are all about, and that they are behind the attempts on his life, despite the attempted assassins links to the intelligence services.

It does seem to be a bit of a coincidence with all the strife in the Middle East at the moment, with Israel trying to drag the US into it's regional war, that Iran is all over the papers about plots to kill Trump.  

However, Trump seems to believe in these claims that it's Iran trying to kill him not Deep State trained nutjobs, that the MIC are using as Patsies. I don't doubt he will go after Iran and back Israel up in their regional war, whether or not he helps close down the Ukrainian threat to global stability and real and potential nuclear conflict with Russia.

Putin only just changed their nuclear doctrine on September 25, 2024. This now means that Russia will view any assault on it supported by a nuclear power as a joint attack, justifying a nuclear response. 

It knows that it is US/UK/NATO troops not Ukrainians, that load in the secure satellite based targeting data needed for long range attacks into it's country, and it will declare war on those countries if attacked by Storm Shadows or ATACM missiles. 

This stopped the recent announcement of such a move by UK's PM Sir Kier Starmer and President Biden on a recent visit to Washington due suspected back channel threats by Russia that they were not bluffing, giving a list of targets they would strike if attacked in such a manner.

So whoever becomes the face of the next US government, we can be assured of more US aggression whether its is in Ukraine, or the Middle East. 

The MIC and Deep State are not going to let the people of the USA have a real voice at the ballot box.  

All that matters is the money those companies like Raytheon and BAe pump in to support Presidential candidates, and paying them back in the best way they know how; 

Constant war.

By Dark Politricks

© 2024 Dark Politricks

What happens to new Presidents to make them break all their campaign pledges?

What happens to new Presidents to make them break all their campaign pledges?

By Dark Politricks

I've always thought that when a new President was elected that on their inauguration day, after all the celebrations, they were then taken into a special room within the White House.

In this room they would be shown tape recordings, videos, signed affidavits from witnesses and other materials that could be used to blackmail them. If at any time during their Presidency they they decided not follow the plans these puppet masters had already planned out for them then these materials would be used to bring them down.

I cannot think of any other reason why so many drunks, drug users, sex addicts and other deviants have been elected as President of the United States in recent years.

The last few Presidents have all had rumours about drugs, gay sex and even murders or drug importation.

People have come out and said that they were involved in sex acts with them, or pilots have recalled seeing the Bush brothers at an airport when dropping off blow after shipping arms down to Central America (Barry Seal).

Even the President's themselves have admitted to taking drugs (whether they inhaled or not).

Of the latest three Presidents we have the following acts being attibuted to them by various investigators and witnesses. These are all acts that could be used to blackmail them.

• Obama (coke, weed, gay sex, birth certificate, links to Islam)
• George Bush (coke, drink, pot, gay sex in the White House)
• Bill Clinton (coke importer, pot smoker - although he claims he didn't inhale! Plus a string of dead people behind him, many who committed suicide with two gun shots to the head! And of course all the sexual acts and infidelity)

Lest you think I am being hypocritical I have no problem with drug use, gays or people following Islam (as long as they are not limiting womens rights, chopping hands off or blowing people up due to Allah's will.)

Murder on the other hand or importing drugs is of course another level altogether.

Plus we all know what the members of the secret society Skull n Bones have to do when they get initiated. Members who include many ex Presidents and powerful officials.

Apparently they lie naked in an open coffin and masturbate whilst the other members all stand around them watching and the new inmate recalls every sexual partner they have had. Whether this is true or not (it is a secret society) it would add many more Presidents to this list.

I have said this many times before, especially when it becomes apparent that the new President is going to break every election pledge they had promised the public on the campaign trail.

What happened to all the "hope and change" Obama promised us?

The end to wars, restoring our civil liberties, closing Gitmo, punishing the previous criminal occupants of the White House for their illegal wars and breaches of international treaties on war crime.

The only thing that could explain it is that either Obama just blatantly lied on the campaign trail or he was blackmailed into following a certain neo-con, pro-war, pro-Israeli, anti-civil liberty line once he was elected.

Apparently 3 out of 10 men are homosexual yet there are hardly any openly gay members of Congress. Why is that? Is the Congress somehow different from the rest of society or is it full of people who have hidden lives and risk exposure at any moment by someone with enough power to expose their hypocrisy?

I just got sent this recording of Bill Hicks on Twitter and I think he sums it up perfectly. As I always say - satire and comedy is sometimes the only way reality can be conveyed to the public without getting a bullet in your head for doing so.



View the original article at www.darkpolitricks.com

Who should become the next most powerful man in the world?

Who should become President of the United States?

By Dark Politricks

This is a follow on from my seemingly popular article called "does anyone really thinks that voting for Mitt Romney will bring real change to the USA.

As I state quite clearly at the beginning of that article, if you dislike or even hate the current US President, Barack Obama, then I agree with your sentiment.

However is hating someone and their policies enough of a good reason to vote in someone who is potentially worse for your economy, liberty, safety and ultimately your country?

Is voting for Mitt Romney, actually voting for the lesser of two evils and if it is then is voting for any kind of evil morally acceptable?

As a Brit I often get asked to "stay out" of "our" American politics. Or to keep my nose out of American Presidential elections.

However it is pretty clear, at least to me over my adult life, that the US President is not only the leader of the USA but the figurehead of the most powerful super power in the world whose decisions and actions effect the lives of people all across the globe.

Whether the leader of the USA should have this much power over the rest of us is a very pertinent question yet one that is hardly, if ever, mentioned in the US mainstream media let alone the US Presidential debates.

However it is a question that the rest of the world knows the importance of, and people all the way from Pakistan to Australia, China to Germany and Brazil to the UK realise that whoever sits in that chair behind the oval desk can have a dramatic effect over the lives of people across the globes life.

For example if you live in Pakistan the leader of the USA could decide whether your family members are counted as "collateral damage" in a drone strike.

If you are Japanese it's whether a US Army soldier will rape your daughter and get away with it due to the "special contract" America makes any country hosting their soldiers and bases sign.

If your Australian it's whether or new US Navy base will be created to help ring fence China and bring your country into any future war with the next emerging super power.

If your Russian it's whether or not your country is gong to be designated as the top enemy of the USA as Romney stated and whether or not you will be ring fenced in by new NATO members and a missile "defense" system that could be used to attack your nation.

For us Brits it's down to the level of humiliation we will have to suffer by watching our politicians make sickeningly arse licking speeches to your congress as Gordon Brown and Tony Blair recently did.

It is also how far up your arse we will hang as a nation and how many of our young soldiers will die fighting the next war we feel duty bound to join you in.

If it's China it's the level of hostility you can expect to face from the next President. Will they see you as a nation that is propping up your failing economy by constantly buying your worthless Treasury bonds or will you be labelled a currency manipulator and then watch as the fading US star tries to fight it's way out of decline by picking a fight with you over Taiwan or Japan.

If it's Iran it's whether or not you are going to be attacked within 6 months or a year. Whether diplomacy will be given any form of a chance or whether the next President will bend straight over to the next Israeli PM and go to war for that country yet again in the Middle East.

Sending US troops to die in foreign lands to fight in deserts that they have no right being in, for a war that is both hypocritical and pointless on many grounds.

You see we non Americans DO have a voice and DO have thoughts about the way the most powerful country in the world should behave in the next 4 years.

Should it follow the neo-con policy of never-ending war, torture, and going it alone against world opinion. Or will they retreat back inside their own borders, become isolationist and chose to sort out their own economy and decimation of their civil rights before deciding to spread "human rights" and "democracy" across the world again.

Policies that many of us see as hypocritical due to their own behaviour and breeches of Human Rights that have become so famous aka Gitmo, Abu Ghrai, Dick Cheney's personal assassination squad and now Obama's king like behaviour to chose who lives and dies whether they are American or not.

Unlike the "I agree with Mitt, I agree with the President" farce of the last Presidential debate which was supposedly about foreign policy there are in fact third party candidates from parties such as the Libertarian Party or the Green Party who DO debate such questions that we mere foreigners ask. Questions such as:

• Should America be the worlds policeman? Especially during a time of "austerity" in which the US economy is running purely on money conjured out of thin air.
• Should this sham of a financial system in which the FED and the Treasury allow banksters like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan to take advantage of to make themselves rich even exist at all?
• Why do Americans feel the need to dance to Israel's tune and start and then fight wars that are not in the USA's best interest?
• Why is the American political system so corrupt that the Supreme Court can give corporations all the same rights as people apart from the right to be imprisoned or executed for their high crimes and treason.
• Is it fair that overseas countries and corporations can now pump obscene amounts of money into the Presidential election through Super PAC's and the aforementioned Citizens United decision and affect the outcome of an election to their benefit. All whilst home grown political parties such as the Greens or the Libertarians get hard;y any air time to make their point on mainstream media and are excluded from the televised Presidential debates which are designed to keep the two headed snake duopoly of a corrupt and owned political system in it's current broken and corrupt form.

Israel obviously knows the importance of being able to control or "lobby" the US President to get what they want and now with Citizens United China, Iran, Mexico and Russia can as well.

The only problem is that it doesn't really matter who they dump tons of money behind as the same old neo-con, pro-war, pro-Israel. amti-Muslim, anti-civil liberty policies will continue unabated whichever of the two parties leaders get voted in.

Both President Obama and Mitt Romney support:

1. Wars of aggression.
2. Bypassing Congress and the War Act to carry out wars that seemingly help their enemies gain control of important regions of the world i.e Libya and Syria.
3. Their support of rebel armies fighting existing regimes that the USA dislikes such as Syria, which maybe authoritarian in nature but are not full of al-Qaeda members and fundamentalist Jihadists who commit massacres en masse, film them and then upload them to YouTube.
4. Supporting drone strikes that kill 50 civilians, women and children for every "Terrorist" killed.
5. Both support the curbing of civil liberties at home, the NDAA, the PATRIOT ACT and other authoritarian pieces of legislation that have curtailed American citizens liberties at home.
6. Both candidates claim to support the constitution whilst doing everything they can to bypass it - for the good of the American citizen of course.
7. Both are big government in their own way.
8. Both are just figureheads for their real puppet masters and bend over to powerful lobbyists.
9. Both are pro-Israel and seemingly allow that country to literally get away with murder - including the murder of American citizens like Furkan Dogan.
10. And the list goes on as my article shows > "Does anyone really thinks that voting for Mitt Romney will bring real change to the USA?

Whilst the USA population is probably blissfully unaware of the other candidates in the race we in the alternative media have been pushing for an expansion of the closed debate the current two possible POTUS's are having.

Another third party candidate debate between the Green Parties Jill Stein and Libertarian parties Gary Johnson is happening this week. Make sure to watch it if you can.

This is the first debate between all four third party presidential candidates, Jill Stein, Rocky Anderson, Virgil Goode and Gary Johnson here.



Please take your time and let me know who you plan to vote for in the election or if you live outside America who you think should become President.

Who should become the next President of the World?

By Dark Politricks

The race is on for the next President of the United States of America. Even though I am not from the USA I feel that due to the power wielded by the dictator like powers that your leader has every person in the world has a stake in this important matter as it could effect us all.

Vote in someone in bed with AIPAC and the Israeli Lobby and get prepared for World War III, rocketing oil prices, huge queues at the petrol pump and a possible nuclear conflict if their desire for a war with Iran is followed through by sanctions and probable conflict in the straits of Hormuz.

Want to vote in someone who actually believes in freedom, liberty and the right to live your life in peace without threat from your own government? Well you have little chance if either the incumbent is re-elected or another globalist, pro big business, Wall St paid for, pro-Israeli, pro-war Republican is elected.

So who should be elected as President to the most powerful country in the world for the next few years at least?

The next presidential term could see the rise of China as well as other BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China) and if the POTUS is another stooge as we have seen so far they will just be taking orders from above and play out the face of the power to the people.

Have you ever noticed that the Presidents of the most powerful country when compared to leaders of other nations all seem to have such more severe histories of past misdemeanors in their shady pasts than the others?

No-one is "allowed to become President" of the most powerful country.

They are selected and chosen for their pliability and probable chance of changing any and all electioneering chants of "hope and change" to "more of the same please".

Just look at Obama and how the masses were fooled by his speeches and promises of change even as all the #altnews sites were declaring him an establishment stooge. What has happened - more war, less liberty, more debt, less freedom, more Wall St money and less jobs. Nothing has changed under Obama.

The last 3 Presidents have all had blatant drug, sex and other issues that could easily allow them to be blackmailed into towing the line and it doesn't stop their.

Gay sex, crack and weed smoking, girlfriend dope dealing, sex with interns and sexual harassment charges, extra-marital sex, gay rentboys in the White house, and so so many "suicides" to account for where the victim decided to kill himself by shooting himself twice in the head - just to "confuse" the coroner I expect.

Even one of the last "good" Presidents who wanted to stop Israel's nuclear ambitions and abolish the FED and the CIA, John Kennedy, had enough personal shenanigans going on in his personal life to allow for blackmail. Maybe he actually was prepared to defy the blackmailers and that was his downfall.

No-one since has been prepared to stand up for what's right and good and if anyone thinks the big business, flip flopping, liberal conservative, Mitt Romney is going to change anything they are surely mistaken. The reason the power brokers want him elected is that he won't change much from the current agenda, just as Obama furthered the earlier Bush agenda.

If he loses then fine Barack goes on for another 4 years destroying more liberties, implementing more Stasi like policies such as the NDAA and preparing the US for their last stand against the rising Red Dragon.

No change will occur until the two faces of the same coin are dismantled and a proper democratic system is created in the USA.

"The choice between Democrats and Republicans has become one between Pepsi and Coca Cola. They both taste sweet at first but they are both full of shit and in the end both will rot your teeth." - Dark Politricks

So who should be elected as President of the most powerful nation in the world?

Another establishment stooge prepared to carry on dismantling the American state and turning it into Amerika, the new East Germany or someone totally new who won't sucumb to the pressures from lobbyists and other paymasters.

Someone prepared to do what's right for the country without worrying about paying back the people who paid for their mulit million dollar electioneering.

Let me know in this poll and please leave a comment if you choose other in the comment section.