Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

Wednesday, 30 September 2020

Here we go again and again - US Election

The US Presidential Election 2020


By Dark Politricks
 
Is the upcoming election in the US yet another choice between one bad option and another?
 
Is it as bad as 2016?
 
A choice between warmongering Hillary and her email scandals, Libyan secret weapon deals with Syrian Terrorists, a crime bill that locked up millions of people on small drug charges, all on top of her husbands sexual crimes. That plus the corrupt Clinton Foundation that had the DNC in it's grips so it could push out a worthy opponent that might have actually beaten Trump.
 
Or was the multiple bankrupt, narcissistic, porn star shagging, Tweet obsessed, despot loving, apparent white supremacist and labelled Russian stooge Donald Trump really the better choice 4 years ago?
 
This election certainly isn't one between two oppressing ideologies, anything left or right of the middle has all been squashed out. Bernie Sanders refused to fight for the right to have people vote for him, knowing that the DNC would be implementing the same dirty tactics as 2016 he should have ran as an independent. Maybe even hooking up with Jill Stein from the Green party. 
 
At least you would have had a proper choice to make, One between an ideology of wealth and tax breaks to the rich, money spent on the military but not education or health, and one between the Constitution, Bill of Rights versus the new US Security State. Anti constitutional bills that have continued long past any emergency measures they were enacted for, still exist in the US, laws such as the PATRIOT ACT and NDAA.
 
Instead the US citizens have two old, potentially both senile, white men who can't even have a civil debate live on television to pick from instead.
 
No other party is allowed in these debates no matter if they have their names on the ballots. It is a rigged showpiece rolled out every 4 years to give the population some semblance of democracy and vague notions of having some form of control over their lives by using the ballot box.
 

 
No wonder the USA is 2 countries divided. ANTIFA, Black Lives Matter, White Supremacists, "The Police and the Bikers" - as Trump once said he had in his corner. The country is ripe for uproar, but has it at any time been anything different?
 
From the early foundation of the US with Slavery, to the initial racist anti-drug laws to Bill & Hillary Clinton's mass incarceration of the poor and coloured with the 1994 Crime Bill. The left is no different from the right in the US. 
 
The real left is way outside anything the Democratic party would tolerate, even Obama with his majority win and control over both houses in the early part of his 1st term didn't do anything to help people of his own colour, the poor or the uneducated. All prime victims of the private prison industry who requires constant inmates and longer sentences so that they can make money with their free labour force of prison workers. 
 
We all saw how the Democratic party treated Bernie Sanders in the last election to know they are not a real left wing party no matter how much Republicans like to call them "Commies".

So is the election of ex Vice President and flip flopping Joe Biden, someone who obviously has skeletons in his closet like Trump and every previous President really a better choice than Hillary? Having dirt on the POTUS is a basic requirement, all so the the real power brokers can control them. Is this the type of politics that is going to change the US for the better? 

I don't care for either of them, just like I didn't care for Hillary or Trump in 2016. Whether Russia influenced the election, by aiding Trump with loans or letting him have intel on Hillary or not it matters little.
 
Most rational people now know that it was just a few Facebook memes, and that there was no real Russian conspiracy. If anyone really influenced the 2016 election it would have been by hacking known compromised voting machines or by scrubbing out votes from people of colour. Either that or by "accidentally" losing postal votes, not counting independents or by changing the maps to make it harder for people from certain districts to access a ballot box. If so then it was Americans not the Russians committing election fraud.

Blame the politicians for redistricting and voter suppression but not Russia, the Mueller investigation didn't manage to impeach him and left the raving Russian conspiracy theorists like Rachel Maddow who gave over most of her TV show to the subject for almost two years, dumbfounded. 

I just watched the first 2 episodes of "The Comey Rule" and it certainly suggests that the Russians managed to plant "their" stooge into the white house. They even showed a sinister scene where two Russian men, drank vodka by a fountain and congratulated themselves on their accomplishment. Artistic license, real facts, or maybe liberal writers trying to stir up the fake conspiracy claims from the last election just as the latest is taking place? 
 
Who knows, does it even matter. The first casualty of an election just like war, is always the truth.

And please don't call me a Russian Fake News spreading dis-info agent in the pocket of George Soros. I may think slightly higher of the Russians than some people but I am not calling them the beacon of liberty either. 
 
However can you really say the USA, still under 20yr old emergency powers that removed Habeas Corpus, enacted mass wire tapping of the citizens by the NSA, and still uses secret Security Letters to shut up whistle blowers, the signs of a shining beacon of liberty that the USA likes to believe it is?

This is before any COVID19 laws that have reduced our population into "yes sir", stand in line idiots not capable of thinking for themselves as the Governments of our countries do everything they can to prolong the lock downs, the restrictions on movement and giving the police powers to break into houses without warrants on suspicion that someone with COVID might be inside.
 
This is the USA, where drunk men on holiday claim I would be speaking German if it wasn't for them. No actually it was the Russian's who lost 40 million at the least, who won WWII by defeating the Germans, liberating Berlin and then preparing to invade Japan from the west.
 
Sorry, it wasn't your Little and Big Boy nukes that won the war by killing innocents. The Japanese had lost Tokyo and many other cities to fire bombing. Hiroshima was just a quicker annihilation. Debate the merits of murdering half a million people with one bomb against the fire bombing of German and Japanese cities and the  slow torture and murder of concentration camp workers. What really is the difference apart from the body count of non combatants?  
 
The USA still has the unenviable title of being the only country to "admittedly" use nuclear weapons on innocent civilians during wartime. Congratulations.
 
I will of course happily admit the Russians weren't the nicest of liberators, raping and killing the citizens of Berlin who had sent their own sons to torch them on the Eastern front with flame throwers and other exotic weapons. Churchill and Truman were quick to turn on their wartime ally after picking the cream of the NAZI scientists they wanted to help start NASA and use their Mengele methods in CIA projects like MKULTRA.
 
Is this the reason my little blog, posts written by myself has been put on a list of 550 sites including Alex Jones Info Wars, Antiwar.com, Russia Today and Press Today as sites that the establishment want to ban you for looking at. I must take it as a badge of honour. Being labelled as a blogger you shouldn't read is so 1984. Shame we have already gone past Orwell's imagination and then some.

However back to the 2016 election fall out and one of the victims has to be the founder of Wikileaks. Whether you think Julian Assange is a hero or a villain, he certainly doesn't deserve to be left rotting in the high security Belmarsh prison whilst waiting for extradition to the US. 
 
I vaguely remember in one Presidential speech in 2016 Trump actually thanked Wikileaks for revealing the emails which leaked info from DNC. From ensuring the Bernie Sanders campaign failed to the Podesta emails and details on the Libyan Embassy attacks, I do recall Trump on stage asking for more revelations to come from Assange.
 
So I wonder if (or when), Julian Assange gets extradited and Trump is re-elected, whether Trump will thank Assange by giving him a pardon. I doubt it. That's the way it goes, speak truth to power and you get a kicking. I feel sorry for him and I hope you all do. Nothing that he has printed has been proven to be false and does it really matter who gave him the information that he leaked, if it brought to attention news of illegal war crimes, election rigging and perversions that you hadn't been aware about?
 
If Julian Assange is to be left to rot in an orange jump suit in the US, and possibly disposed of just like Jeffery Epstein, then surely the editors at the Guardian and other papers who published his data should be on trial as well? 
 
Is it really fair to only label only old school tree killing papers as the only "real journalists", or can't a blogger or website not compete at the same level with the same protections? 
 
I only have to look in my local shop at he papers to see how bipartisan our papers are. One paper reveals that Tory PM, Boris Johnson's Father was caught breaking the law by not wearing a mask in a shop and the paper next to it accuses ex Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn of breaking the rules by having more than 6 people at a dinner. Can you really say that this BS pro right or left wing news is any different from blogs or sites that like to criticise politics from different angles than the norm?

Was it really easier for supposed Russian agents to hack and steal thousands of GB of data from DNC servers, when it was more likely that someone inside the DNC just downloaded data and passed them onto Wikileaks by a thumb drive?
 
You just had to see how affected Julian Assange was when he appeared on the Bill Maher show and offered a $20,000 reward for any information on the death of DNC worker Seth Rich.to know that somehow the two were connected. Seth Rich, a DNC operator, supposedly killed for no reason, nothing robbed, nothing stolen, just another ignored death that can be easily connected to the Clinton's wrath.Why has no-one really put 2 and 2 together. 
 
You may call me a conspiracy theorist but I would rather believe that rich and powerful people control our lives on purpose rather than believe all the coincidences that just magically occur at the same time to achieve a certain goal. Nothing happens on accident when it comes to global politics. Wars are planned and then excuses found, if not created, when it comes to pushing the populace one way or another.
 
Bill and Hillary Clinton have been co-workers with the Bush Crime Family since the CIA were smuggling coke to then Governor Bill Clinton's Arkansas Mena Airport. Weapons south to Nicaraguan death squads, coke smuggled north by Barry Seal for the CIA, all so that Freeway Ricky Ross could sell it in LA. This was the root cause of the Crack epidemic of the 80's, and the failed War on Drugs that the CIA helped supply the nation with. The Clinton and Bush crime families are joined at the hip.
 
When it comes to drugs there really is nothing worse than a hypocrite politician who is happy to incarcerate millions for doing exactly what they do themselves. Bill Clinton was a cocaine vacuum cleaner claimed his brother Roger, and George and Jeb Bush were caught picking up their own supply of coke at Mena airport. Obama liked driving round in limo's smoking crack, god knows what Ronald Reagan was into, Quaaludes maybe?
 
The author of the "Dark Alliance" expose on this CIA link, Gary Webb, was found dead with 2 gunshots to the head and it was ruled a suicide, as were other people on the list of "Clinton linked" witnesses, accusers and whistle-blowers who have been found dead in suspicious circumstances . I guess it's quite common for people to try to kill themselves with a pistol, blow half their brains out, not die but still have the mental and nervous capacity to pull the trigger a second time. Should Gary Webb be added along with Seth Rich to the Clinton kill list maybe?
 
So back to the beginning, what will change in the US if Biden wins the election. Will the world spin the other way the next day, will liberty flourish once again in the Western world? 
 
That is of course that an election actually takes place and COVID19 laws and "health considerations" are not brought in to separate the mile long lines at voting polls where everyone must stand 2 metres back from those in-front of them. 
 
Trump and half the White House and members of his team now have the infection after a lawn party in which no-one wore masks as they all hugged each other with socially distancing the farthest thing from their minds. With the POTUS now ill it not only gains sympathy for him, but allows him to not participate in more awful debates and provide potential excuses for not campaigning if he loses the election. 
 
Whether Trump wins or Biden does, it doesn't really matter, just like in every binary US election, whoever wins they will continue to do all of the following:
 
Be beholden to big interests and string pullers behind the scenes. Whether Wall St, lobbyists for private prisons, big pharma, and of course the Military Industrial Complex. Either politician will continue any wars they are already engaged in and possibly extend the US Empire some more. Whoever is up for election I sure don't see any peace makers, despite ludicrous nominations for both Trump and Biden to get a Nobel Peace Prize.  
 
Obama was awarded one when the world fell for the "hope and change" we all desperately wanted, then sat back and watched as he expanded US wars of terror, and implemented unconstitutional laws. He kept Gitmo open despite promising to close it and continued the unfair policy of backing Israel in every UN vote through the use of a veto. That is apart from his last which he "bravely" abstained on his way out of office.
 
It takes "real balls" to wait until Bibi and Israel can't blackmail you anymore and it doesn't actually matter to abstain from a UN vote on Israel Palestine relations. If the Nobel committee had any pride they would demand that Nobel Peace medal back.

Obama's UN vote obviously caused shock and horror across the pro-Zionist world, Obama was even labelled the most anti-Israeli President ever despite no real attempt to settle the Palestinian issue. However much Trump is pro Israel, and considered an idiot or geographical dunce, he hasn't actually declared war on a country within his first term. This doesn't make him a peace maker for Nobel to prematurely award a peace prize to though. Even Hitler was nominated for a Nobel Peace award in 1939.
 
So whether the black ops teams are fighting in new areas in Africa, fomenting coups in South America or still smuggling drugs from Afghanistan, the USA hasn't actually officially expanded the war on terror despite the expectations of many. 
 
There were early issues over Syria, watching the US Media get wet over Trump ordering bombing raids was sickening. “I think Donald Trump became president of the United States last night” said Fareed Zakaria, host of CNN’s flagship foreign affairs program, after one Syrian bombing attack. 
 
Fox even played Country music about Freedom as Trump ordered the largest non nuclear bomb to be dropped in Afghanistan. What did Fox anchor Ainsley Earhardt say about it? That video’s black and white, but that is what freedom looks like... That’s the red, white and blue.” - Yes I'm afraid your right, that is the red white and blue and you should be ashamed of continuing a war against the tribal people of one of the poorest countries on earth. 
 
A populace never defeated in war, not the British Empire on multiple attempts, not the Soviets or even Alexander the Great. No-one has managed to defeat and subdue the poor Afghans for centuries. Is the US really still there to fight al-Qaeda or are they just wasting money fighting people who just want them to leave them alone?
 
What really is the point of firing $500k+ missiles into mud huts that these people live in apart from furnishing the MIC's pockets. 92% of the people in Afghanistan when interviewed had never even heard of 9.11 or the WTC attacks. 
 
They are just fighting yet another invading enemy just as they have done for 1000's of years. However they do grow the most Opium in the world, a currency the CIA has been involved in since their creation. From the Golden Triangle to Colombia to the Vietnam war, the US has always been heavily involved with drug smuggling.

Then there's the other attempt by the US using their ex enemy / GLADIO 2 Jihadist fighters to other-throw another Russian ally in Syria. However it was Russia that actually came and cleared up ISIS, something the US/UK/French/Israeli Axis of War powers never managed, or really wanted to do. The pretend moderate fighters were just as evil as the radical Jihadists. Even the Free Syrian Army was full of al-Qaeda types willing to cut open dead soldiers bodies to eat their hearts on video for all the world to see.  
 
Syria was on the list of countries General Wesley Clarke was told that the US was going to other-throw after the 9.11 attacks along with Iran. We are still waiting for the US/Israeli move to attack Iran, despite Israeli pressure behind the scenes to get the US to do their bidding again. They managed to get US soldiers to die for their cause with Libya and Iraq and probably a lot more died in Syria than we will ever hear about. 
 
Will Joe Biden be the next Zionist President to turn the Middle East into a bush fire again?
 
I'm just glad that somehow Trump hasn't caused WWIII yet, whether Biden will do just as good a job making the US look like the war mongers they are will be for the future to report on. However I cannot see how Biden would be a better President than if Hillary had been elected in 2016.
 
The Democrats are NOT the party of peace, they are just another side of the two headed coin that rules the most aggressive and powerful surveillance state in the world after China

Whoever comes in as President will undoubtedly continue to hold onto those precious 9.11 laws brought in when the 3 WTC skyscrapers fell due to just 2 planes hitting them. I remember during the Obama years when Trump was all over the news asking for the redacted 28/29 9.11 Commission papers to be revealed. Once released however little noise was ever made by the MSM or US Government about their contents.

I am guessing most Americans don't even know what these redacted pages the Saudi's lobbied and paid to have removed from the 9.11 "Omission Report", told us about their funding of the terrorist patsies used in the 9.11 attacks. 
 
Trump made sure to bow as low as he criticised Obama for doing, in front of the King of Oil / New home of sporting events in the desert. Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman is trying to Sportswash the Kingdom that continues to jail and lash female rape victims as adulterers and murder and massacre innocent Yemeni children with illegal weapons with US support
 
Trump gave MBS the benefit of the doubt despite evidence to the contrary when they hacked a US journalist up alive inside a Turkish embassy. Will Joe Biden be so accommodating to their Petrodollar ally?
 
Whatever changes with a new face in power won't make the slightest bit of difference to most of America or the world who look to the US for leadership. The US Congress, Senate and President will all continue to allow AIPAC and Dual Citizens control their actions when it comes to their continued dismantling of any hope of a two state solution in Palestine/Israel.
 
The MIC will continue to make billions from the existing wars in Afghanistan, and the private security corporations that have replaced US troops in Iraq will be cashing in cheques for years to come. 
 
New skirmishes in the never ending war on terror will continue, and the American people will still not question how it is that al-Qaeda, the supposed terrorists behind 9.11, became their allies in Syria when it suited the US for them to do so.
 
Questions about 9.11 and the possibility of a plane made of aluminum that cannot fly 550mph inches above the ground vertically before punching through 3 ringed walls at the Pentagon remain. The CIA whistle blower who on his death bed admitted to helping demolish WTC7 in NYC will continue to be ignored by the MSM and other whistle blowers like Sibel Edmonds smeared when they claim they knew the CIA had relations with bin-Laden right up to 9.11. 
 
No-one will ask loudly why most of the people rounded up in the days after the attacks were mostly Israeli not Arab. These people were held for weeks before all being deported on VISA violations. Will anyone in power even question why Mossad sent a team to "document the event", as they themselves told an Israeli TV audience. 
 
How did they know what to document if they didn't know the attacks were going to happen?
 
Oh well I must be an anti-Semite for raising legitimate questions about Israeli involvement in the event that has turned the first 20 years of the 21st century into one of endless war abroad, and at home a police state environment where the NSA spies on you at every opportunity.
 
Well I have rattled on for as long as I could about the ever so important decision you in the US must make. It doesn't just affect you, it affects the whole world, more some than others but the tentacles of American power are long and far reaching
 
However if you really think electing Joe Biden will stop the wars, reverse the spying, end police brutality and Government invasion of privacy then please inform me how this is going to actually happen?


By Dark Politricks
 
© 2020 Dark Politricks

Friday, 21 December 2018

Amerika, A modern day East Germany

Amerika, A modern day East Germany

By Dark Politricks

The definition of a Police State is:
"A state in which the government exercises rigid and repressive controls over the social, economic, and political life of the people, especially by means of a secret police force."
History shows that mankind has been plagued by authoritarian governments since the dawn of collective governance. We have many instances of governments that fit the definition of a Police State from the East German Stasi, Soviet KGB to the current Chinese government who still utilise whole teams of agents to follow westerners of interest around when they visit the country.

However these countries have all been authoritarian one party states and it has always been presumed that within western democracies the idea of a police state only existed in the nightmares of those sections of society who mistrusted the government no matter what it did.


The Washington Post expose looked into the huge expansion of the security services and other intelligence agencies since the attacks of 9/11 and revealed some stunning facts such as:

Some 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counter terrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the United States.

An estimated 854,000 people, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington, D.C., hold top-secret security clearances.

In Washington and the surrounding area, 33 building complexes for top-secret intelligence work are under construction or have been built since September 2001. Together they occupy the equivalent of almost three Pentagons or 22 U.S. Capitol buildings - about 17 million square feet of space.

In case that second point escapes due attention it means that roughly 1 in every 150 adults within the USA has top secret security clearance and if that many people have the top level clearance how many more have one of the many lower levels? 

It does seem from this study alone that the USA is awash with spooks and spies and as we know from the past ten years of abuse they are not all engaged in fighting the war on terror and looking for the supposed architect of 9/11 Usama bin-Laden.

Instead the government has directed this huge intelligence apparatus onto the people they are supposed to protect and one can only wonder whether this was the original aim in the first place. No democratic country would have ever accepted such a huge intrusion of privacy, destruction of civil liberties and total disregard to the rule of law had the threat of terrorism not existed and been used as the excuse of the century to implement such draconian measures.

Like many governments throughout the ages from Roman times with Julius Caesar, to Hitler and the Reichstag fire, the terrorist attacks of 9/11 were used by politicians to expand the power of the state at the expense of the citizenry using an outside enemy as the excuse. Whether you believe the attacks of 9/11 were staged or not is not the point as it is clear from succeeding events that they were used by the Bush government, and now the Obama administration to increase the power of the government to intrude into the lives of the public.

The main piece of legislation that started the ball rolling towards a Police State was the Patriot Act. This law was rushed through congress without proper consultation and debate and many senators later admitted that they didn't even read the bill. The very suspiciously timed Anthrax attacks on likely opponents of the bill  ensured that the politicians passed through a truly anti-libertarian bill that had been sitting around for years just waiting for the right "event" to occur.

The law expanded the definition of terrorism to include many domestic activities and it enabled the federal government to increase it's surveillance of the public through a systematic warrant-less wire-tapping campaign that trawled through every conceivable piece of electronic information from phone calls, emails, Internet traffic and credit card transactions whilst it built up a huge database of real time events in which it hoped to find signs of terrorist connections in a huge game of connect the dots.

The loosening of the terms that define what is and not terrorism should be a chilling warning to anyone concerned with the war on terror. We have seen here in the UK how the numerous anti terrorism laws have been misused by Police officers to prevent photographers from recording police assaults on the streets and in preventing legitimate protest. 

We have also seen our government abuse powers that were supposedly only there for exceptional purposes for non exceptional means such as when the UK froze the bank accounts of Iceland during the banking crisis.

The US government has now gone one step further in it's expansion of the war of terror against it's own citizens by enacting presidential powers that allow for the assassination of US born citizens throughout the world. The US government it seems is now perfectly willing to execute it's own citizens if they believe them to be linked to terrorism. No trial is required to contest any evidence that may or may not exist and the defendant is not allowed to answer any charges to a jury of his peers. If the government deems you to be a terrorist with it's newly relaxed definition of what constitutes terrorism then you may be assassinated.

Not only is the US government cranking up the war on terror by attacking those citizens it decides fall into the category of domestic or foreign terrorist it is also trying to crack down on the only forum in which free speech and dissent of government still exists e.g the internet.

In an age in which the dying print media is being deserted en mass and those that control it are scared of losing a major propaganda tool the attacks on the alternative media have increased tenfold. Claims that the old media is in the pocket of government and not doing it's job properly have increased since the 9/11 attacks and the war in Iraq. This was a war which was miss-sold to the public with the help of national newspapers prepared to look the other way as the government used them to drip feed false stories to a public who knew no better.

The only real voices of opposition are to be found in the blogosphere and the powers that be hate that they cannot control the news in the same way as they could buy off newspaper owners, editors and journalists. Instead of only worrying about a dozen or so national newspapers the government has to contend with millions of blogs and alternative news sites and the only tactic that would work is one that limits ownership of such a site or makes the available content illegal in some way or other. This is why there are now calls to regulate Internet bloggers such as the bill being brought forward by Bruce Patterson.

Obama's Information Czar, Cass Sunstein, has already wrote about his desire to crack down on blogs and sites that dare discuss topics that the government deems as conspiracy theory. This would include discussion of alternative theories surrounding the 9/11 attacks, or concluding that the JFK assassination involved more hit-men than Lee Harvey Oswald on his own. In fact it would cover anything that the government might deem beyond the limits of discussion by those who want to look beyond the official story immediately rolled out whenever a high crime is committed.

Then there are bills being introduced such as Senator Joe Lieberman’s 197-page Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act, which aims to mimic China’s firewall and which would give the President powers to control IT networks and the flow of information in times of emergency such as a cyber attack.

Disabling the internet may be an extreme option to consider but deleting content that is deemed unsuitable is already a daily occurrence. With the merger of leading internet companies such as Google and the CIA it has become very easy for media deemed anti government to be pulled from sites such as YouTube or for search results to be tweaked to hide popular anti government search terms.

We already know how Google and the NSA are working together since the attack on Google by China earlier this year and there have also been claims that the CIA helped fund Google when it was starting up.

With all these links to the intelligence agencies it can safely be assumed that Google's massive database of user traffic, search terms, blogs, emails, videos and much more is seen as a prized asset by the intelligence community and who knows at what level they already co-operate when it comes to sharing data.

Whereas old school Police States were very obvious in their surveillance and monitoring techniques the modern day Amerika has no need to put half a dozen handlers onto someone they wish to monitor (not that they don't have the staff) as through their close links with Google and Microsoft and their new plans to access private information without a warrant they can literally let the information come to them.

We live in a semi virtual world where an online persona is just as important as your real one and due to the amount of social time people spend on social networking sites and the dependence of key infrastructure on the Internet means that control of the network literally can mean control over society.

We already know our governments monitor all our phone calls through the ECHELON system and there is no technical or it seems legal limitation preventing them from analysing every single packet of data transferred over the Internet if they so wished.

Therefore due to a political class that seems to be bought and paid for by those wanting to maintain the war on terror and the surveillance society it has sprung up at home there seems little hope of stopping the high tech police state we are now living in. The solutions are available to those with the means to implement them but in the end it comes down to a choice between a public uprising against the state or a change in the political class running it.

With elections in America due very soon it is a great opportunity to show the ruling elite that the public is not prepared to swap liberty and freedom for fear and the police state that enables it. Judge Napolitano always asks his guests the following question:
"which is more threatening to our way of live, terrorism or an ever increasing secretive and authoritarian state?"
The answer is clearly the latter and we need to elect officials that believe so too.

Only when the phony war on terror is seen for what it is can we start to rollback all the police state apparatus that has build up around us over the last decade. A large section of the population has fallen for the tricks played out by power hungry politicians throughout history and willingly handed over liberty in return for perceived security. 

The time has come to realise this was a false trade and that Thomas Jefferson was correct when he said:
“Those who would trade safety for freedom deserve neither.”

Saturday, 16 June 2018

Rachel Maddow and MSNBC are attacking Trump from the Right

Rachel Maddow and MSNBC are attacking Trump from the Right

By Dark Politricks
The Jimmy Dore Show

Rachel Maddow has somehow managed to tie Russia into the North Korean peace talks, once again attacking Trump from the right.

What has happened to the left?

Was it just the colour of Obama's skin that they fawned over, forgetting all the wars he started.

The extra bombs he dropped, much more than George W Bush.

The Drones, the collateral damage, the failure to pass a public option when he had the power to do so.

The removal of civil liberties, his absence from protests he promised to be at the front of when teachers protested and Wall St was swarming with Occupy protesters All people pissed at being stripped of their money by banksters which he did nothing to stop them losing their homes.

Their was the North Pole ice drilling, fracking, oil spills, drones killing babies and women and being called enemy combatants so they were not counted as accidental deaths.

The NDAA and not repealing the powers given to Bush after 9.11 which are no longer needed.

His locking up of whistle blowers and journalists and all the other non-liberal acts that they seem to forget about.

It seems these faux liberals on "liberal" networks are the new FOX news.

I bet Rachel just stares at a poster of Obama on the ceiling above her bed and wishes for a better time when the President had shaved hair not a wig.

That is the basics of it as US Foreign and domestic policy hardly ever changes when Presidents come and go. The deep state control the levers of power and Israel controls Congress.

America was destroyed as a moral compass years ago and many Americans don't seem to care or don't realise what has happened to their country.

Obama did nothing to stop it and if Hillary Clinton had been elected we would probably be in a nuclear bunker right now due to her angry nasty demeanor, her terrorist gun supplying through Libya to Syria, and her cranking up of war threats to Russia who have done nothing that the US doesn't do by a factor of -500%. Was invited to Syria to help defeat ISIS which would be complete now if the Axis of War hadn't just decided it was their right to bomb any country they want.

Trump is low hanging fruit to mock but if he actually delivers peace (we will have to wait and see), then shouldn't the likes of Rachel Maddow be happy about de-escalation of nuclear war or will she find another way to tie Russia into some narrative so we can all burn in a radioactive cloud.


By Dark Politricks

©2018Dark Politricks

Friday, 18 December 2015

Why Their Is No Difference Between Democrats and Republicans

Why Their Is No Difference Between Democrats and Republicans

By Dark Politricks

No Difference between the GOP and Democrat
There is no difference between the Republicans and Democrats

I know that Conservatives in the US call Obama a Marxist and the Democrats attack the GOP as money grabbers for the rich, but in reality there is very little difference between the GOP and the Democrats.

From my perspective across the pond I haven't seen the US change for the better since all my years of being interested in US politics. This includes both Republican and Democratic Presidencies as well as times where the President was of the same party that controlled both houses of Congress yet still didn't push through policies you would expect them to.

Both the GOP and Democratic parties are:
  • Pro war, even if it means possible world war with Russia/China.
  • Pro Israel and pro AIPAC / JDL plus anti Palestinian rights.
  • Pro regime change (Iraq, Libya, Ukraine & Syria to name a few).
  • Pro drone strikes even on US citizens without judicial review.
  • Pro Bankster & Wall St and anti Working Class & main street.
  • Pro Police arbitrary killings. It feels as if the streets of some US cities are full of uninformed paramilitary death squads at the moment.
  • Pro NSA/FBI/CIA/Homeland security spying on you through your cars GPS, phones microphone/cameras, websites visited from your ISPs and server log files and even now through your TV!
If you have a new "Smart TV", have you actually read the privacy statement they make you sign in detail?

If not do so!

I read my new 4k TVs statement the other night and it mentioned built-in microphones and cameras installed into the TV to take photos of you for facial recognition and even to record your height, weight and vocal patterns.

Of course they claim that this is just to help deliver you tailored adverts and help with certain smart apps such as those that use voice commands or hand gestures but all this data goes off to a 3rd party company first to be analysed.

The legalese didn't mention who got access to this data or how long it was stored just that it could be used by the appropriate authorities and that non compliance was covered by New York Law.

Therefore if you break your new Smart TV's terms and conditions in any way you can have US policemen coming to arrest you wherever you are in the world. I have to wonder which 3 letter agencies get access to all this data, it really has become that Telescreen from George Orwell's 1984, if not I don't know how much closer they can become.

Just like phones which when switched off still have enough power to ping the phone masts and therefore record your whereabouts, I'd have a good bet that there is just enough power when your TV is in standby mode to record you through the microphone and camera.

Therefore don't rely on turning off your camera/microphone in the settings, if you are that paranoid go back to basics and cover them with masking tape. The simplest methods are best. However when even your TV is a sophisticated computer that can spy on you and record your actions and speech then we really have entered George Orwell's dystopian world.

Also people forget that our phones are those microchips everybody worried about having implanted in them to keep track of them by the Government in the 90s. It was the big thing, being chipped, a conspiracy theory that was just in the mind of tin foil hat wearing loons. However we happily take our phones with us everywhere we go. We constantly "Sign In", and "log where we are", "tag who we are with", and write down everything we are doing. Leaving a nice long trail of our life on the Internet to be remembered for decades to come.

To the youngsters of today there is no concept of privacy and they seem happy to give that away for the ability to communicate and therefore be logged and recorded.

With our mobile and household tracking devices we can now be located and spied on 24/7 and if you are a terrorist, domestic extremist, protester or even a citizen journalist (under new US combatant rules), you could find yourself being the target of something nasty flying through the air.

Microsoft, Facebook and Google constantly hand over all your private chat data, search requests, emails, and history of websites that we've visited to the authorities. Both if asked and sometimes just as standard due to their close relationships with the alphabet agencies of the US surveillance state. Google took seed money from the CIA and helped them design some of the NSA's searching algorithms for programs similar to those Snowden leaked such as PRISM and XKeyScore. Plus Microsoft was adding chips into their PC's from the 90's to help the NSA override any secure cryptography so that they could access your PC at will. Even the BBC reported on it in this 1999 article.

There is no difference between Democrats and Republicans on the issue of national security which means knowing as much as possible about as many people as possible.

ISIS which is a creation of US/UK Middle Eastern foreign policy, just as al-Qaeda was a database of CIA cut out agents/Jihadists, used to destabilise countries as ex UK Foreign Minister, Robin Cook wrote about, are used to scare us into just handing over all our civil liberties that the terrorists supposedly hate us for having. The US were bombing ISIS for a year as their Caliphate grew in size. Therefore they were either very bad at their bombing campaign compared to the Russians or they were allowing them to survive. Using the existence of these terrorists as an excuse to cut our civil liberties is basically doing their job for them.

If they truly "hate us for our freedoms", as George W Bush famously said, we shouldn't hand all our freedoms away never for them to return with laws like the Patriot ACT and the NDAA and in the UK the multitude of anti-terrorism bills that have been passed.

So it's the same with all 3 states in the Axis of War, the UK, France and the USA who have all suspended certain rights and freedoms due to the "threat" of terrorism.

I'd really like to see both Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn be leaders of both the USA and UK at the same time JUST TO SEE if REAL CHANGE is even possible from the top down.

When Obama came into office on a wave of support due to his meaningless chant of "We Can Change", it seemed to me that the slogan was purely about the colour of the White House occupants. Therefore I don't even believe real change from the top is actually possible, never been tried, or just stopped by the main string pullers from behind the curtains.

Having two characters like Bernie and Corbyn in power would at least show us if it was still possible to change the world for the better whether you like their policies or not.
If both these men did have full control and held true to the principles they currently state then in power we should see:
  • Less prison for drugs and minor offences.
  • Less Banksters running a mock with our tax payers money and no "too big to fail or jail" companies allowed to bank roll terrorists and drug cartels (e.g HSBC).
  • Less spending on the department of war and more on education, job creation, house building and investment in the people and country instead of wasting it on £800,000 missiles that are fired into rubble in pointless overseas wars.
  • Less stupid overtures that suggest our leaders want to start a new cold (or even hot) war with Russia. They seem to forget Russia helped solve the Iran nuclear deal, remove chemical weapons from Syria and are basically crushing DAESH in Syria despite Turkey and Saudi Arabian support for the Jihadists.
  • Less power to corporations who are NOT real people with feelings and emotions yet in the USA under law they are treated as such and so during elections pump millions into campaigns of people who will benefit them if they get into power.
  • Better and cheaper health care free at the point of use in the US, and less middle management and PPI hospitals in the UK that are bankrupting us into the future.
  • Free adult education and the ability to retrain and gain new skills throughout your life to keep you in a job. Having taxpaying workers is much better than people relying on state handouts.
  • Oh and all the stolen civil liberties we have had removed from us due to the "War on Terror" returned in the hundreds.

The Two Faced Janus Coin of American Politics


The two faced Janus coin of US politics
Both Main Parties in the USA Serve The Same Interests

These are all good reasons why we need strong 3rd parties in the USA and UK.

Many Europeans don't even realise that 3rd parties exist in the USA. Parties such as the Greens, Libertarians, Justice Party and even (shock horror) socialists!

Major political reform is needed so that these parties get a fair shake of the whip during elections, can debate the other parties on the major networks, and get the air time they require to make a dent into the two-faced Janus coin called American Democratic elections.

Of course the reason they don't is that the debates are all staged collusion with the networks who are all filled with COINTELPRO government mouthpieces. They have no urge to see REAL change come to the USA and actually do something to shake up the status quo.

How many Americans know they are still living under "Emergency Laws" enacted after 9 11 giving the President ultimate power. When will this end?

How good would an alliance be between the UK and the USA that would get on with other nations better and stop real evil e.g Israeli illegal occupation of Palestinian lands and Chinese/Saudi treatment of their people instead of selling weapons and outsourcing all our jobs to them.

Money should not matter more than morals but to George Osborne, Obama and the US/UK arms companies who must carry on their trade it seemingly does.

Our allies are not dissimilar to our enemies e.g ISIS and Saudi Arabia, yet we allow the 7th century hypocritical scum that the Saudi's are to continue with own Janus act of both funding and fighting terrorism.

However will this ever happen or will the establishment prevent the elections of such men as Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn  due to the threat of real change?

The realistic outcome is that some idiot like Donald Trump or a warmonger like Hillary Clinton will get into power in the USA to reign alongside an equally right-wing Tory party in the UK and the Axis of War will roll on.....

One can only wish.....

Remember, as George Orwell famously said:
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
Oh, and you do have a real choice in your elections.

 
View the original article at the main site www.darkpolitricks.com.

By Dark Politricks
 
© 2015 Dark Politricks

Thursday, 12 September 2013

Putin's article in the New York Times was correct

Putin's article in the New York Times was correct

By Dark Politricks

As the recent article in the New York Times shows, when it comes to getting an outside perspective on your own Government, even an ex KGB, dictator who suppresses his own people can be right sometimes.

He definitely has his faults and no-one can claim him to be a beacon of light for liberty but then can we really honestly claim that our western leaders are?

Is Obama really the shining light of American exceptionalism that Putin attacks for arrogance beyond belief? As he tells the US public:
“It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation,” Mr Putin wrote.

“There are big countries and small countries, rich and poor, those with long democratic traditions and those still finding their way to democracy. Their policies differ, too,” he wrote. “We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord’s blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal.”
Putin also wrote in the NYT today that it was the Syrian rebels, and not the Syrian government, who were behind a recent alleged chemical attack. Evidence upon evidence seems to back this up. Yet for some reason the western press seems to ignore all the reports from Turkey, Russia and Syria when they find chemical weapons factories or stashes of weapons ready to be unleashed.

As he himself admits, no-one doubts chemical weapons were used in Syria, the only question is by who. As Putin says in the article:
"there was no doubt that chemical weapons had been used in the Syrian conflict but “there is every reason to believe it was used not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons, who would be siding with the fundamentalists.”
This would fit with all the intelligence we have seen in the alternative media over the past months that seem to suggest plans to stage provocations using chemical weapons that could be blamed on Assad including:

Hacked emails from defence contractor Britam that revealed a plan apparently“approved by Washington” , to stage a chemical weapons attack in Syria and blame it on the Assad regime.

Raids by Turkish security forces who found a 2 kg cylinder filled with sarin gas after searching the homes of Al-Nusra Syrian militants in Adana.

Earlier independent UN investigations into the use of chemical weapons which found that previous chemical weapon attacks were carried out by Syrian rebels NOT the forces of President Assad.

The Syrian rebels have already claimed they are willing to unleash chemical weapons on Israel from Assad controlled areas of Syria. Will that be the ultimate false flag attack that starts the war, Putin warns that it might.
No one doubts that poison gas was used in Syria. But there is every reason to believe it was used not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons, who would be siding with the fundamentalists. Reports that militants are preparing another attack — this time against Israel — cannot be ignored.
He wants to wait for the inspectors to report on their findings and not let the US just blatantly ignore the international law they helped set up after WWII to start another Iraq style mis-adventure in the Middle East. What is the point of having the UN if members can just bypass the rulings of the security council whenever they like?

The US/UK/France might not like it when Russia and China veto their proposals over starting wars in Libya or Syria but then the US blocks every measure at reigning in the excesses of Israel. It is the pot calling the kettle black. We either stick to the laws made after World War II that any country starting a war of aggression is an illegal act or we might as well throw the whole concept away.

As recent events in the ancient Christian village of Maaloula have shown the Sryian rebels are not "freedom fighters" but suppressors of liberty. Video's have been released of even the "moderate" Free Syrian Army rebels eating the entrails of dead victims and video's and stories abound of beheadings, stonings and summary executions.

Is it really sensible to swap one dictator who has allowed Christians and Muslims to live side by side for centuries for an al-Qaeda strong hold where people are forced at gun point to convert to Islam? Why are we so willing to stand side by side with the supposed enemy we have been fighting against for the last decade?

Does America really want another Iraq on their hands?

Putin thinks it's foolish if they do and it seems that the majority of American citizens do as well.

Putin may not be John Kennedy or Martin Luther King but someone needs to talk some sense into the neo-con warmongers before they unleash hell in the Middle East. If that means Vladimir Putin, the strong-arm leader of Russia then so be it. It only adds to suspicions by many that this proposed war is another under the table proxy battle for reasons our leaders won't readily admit.

You can read Putin's whole article here: Putin Speaks to America.

View the original article Putin was right at darkpolitricks.com

Sunday, 16 June 2013

Prism means we should all be wary - journalists especially!

Prism means we should all be wary - journalists especially!

By Dark Politricks

With the explosion of information about the latest American spy scandal, and the revelation that the USA has been spying on us all for years, isn't it all about time we all took our Internet security more seriously?

You might have read my earlier article Internet censorship and surfing anonymously but if you are not a "text" reader and felt over-loaded with information then the following links to some nice infographics will help show you just how Google and your browser track, log, identify and make money from your personal information as you surf the web.

They will also show you in a simple way which settings to turn off depending on the browser you use, plus which browser specific plugins to install, to increase your security, improve privacy and reduce your "Internet footprint".

You may have seen Microsoft promoting their privacy options lately for Internet Explorer on the TV and there is a new setting which the browsers have introduced called DNT (Do Not Track).

Supposedly if you enable this setting in your browsers settings it will pass a special header called DNT (Do Not Track) along to all sites that you visit which is supposed to tell them to respect your privacy and not log or track you.

You can actually see this header with tools like HttpFox or Firebug or even most browsers own inbuilt developer console (F12 usually brings it up).

When you inspect your Request headers (all the information your browser passes to each site on each request for an HTML page, image or other resource required by websites to work) you will see the DNT header set to 1 if it's enabled.

However like all these things even though Google's own Chrome browser has a setting for this new option they themselves DON'T EVEN support it!

Just goes to show you that money is more important than a users security or privacy and that your online data is worth $£€ to the Internet companies.

Have a look at the following pages if you want a nice illustrated guide on how browsers and Internet sites track you online.

This explains how you can stop being tracked by your browser.

This explains how you are tracked online when you use Google.

This explains how your search results are tailored to previous searches and details obtained by your browser.

You should also look into using secure search engines such as www.startpage.com or duckduckgo.com instead of Google (yes other search engines do exist and are just as good!) as well as researching secure browsers and tools such as TOR for secure Internet browsing.

As journalists are now targets of the American government and whistle-blowers seem to be top of the USA's execution lists, far ahead it seems of real terrorists, then newspapers and anyone else wanting to bring truth to the masses by exposing government secrets should really be looking at creating secure ways to communicate so as to protect their sources. We long expected that our governments were basically spying on all our emails, phone calls, Internet traffic and now we have been proven right. It is up to you alone to help make it as hard as possible for them to track you if you respect your own privacy.

It may be hard but the easiest thing to do is stay away from any of the big Internet companies and their products e.g Google, Facebook, Skype, Hotmail etc (there are alternatives) and lock down and encrypt your PC and as much of your traffic as possible.

As Ron Paul says in this article he fears the most recent whistle-blower Edward Snowden might even be killed by a US drone strike!

What the fuck is going on USA?

If anyone was mistaken about the real reason for the war on terror and the loss of liberties at home that sprung from it this should come as a big fat punch on the nose warning!

This war is not going to end. Who does anyone think we are ever going to sign a peace treaty with to end it?

No this war was all about allowing the governments of supposed western democratic nations to go draconian on all of our asses and we only have to look at how Obama, a supposed liberal President, is:

  • attacking free speech,
  • spying on reporters who dare report on the Government,
  • going after whistle-blowers which are supposedly protected by the law,
  • spying on all Americans and International countries who use the Internet without warrant or probable cause,
  • executing American nationals without trial,
  • killing innocent people by the hundreds in remote drone strikes,
  • supporting al-Qaeda linked terrorists in Syria and Libya, and worse of all,
  • increasing the American police state that is still under emergency laws (since 9.11) - with bills like the NDAA to follow on from the constitution killing PATRIOT Act which was brought in by George W Bush.
Whether you like Obama or not a TRUE liberal would not be promoting such activities.

View the original article Prism means we should all be wary - journalists especially! at the main site darkpolitricks.com.

Sunday, 24 March 2013

What happens to new Presidents to make them break all their campaign pledges?

What happens to new Presidents to make them break all their campaign pledges?

By Dark Politricks

I've always thought that when a new President was elected that on their inauguration day, after all the celebrations, they were then taken into a special room within the White House.

In this room they would be shown tape recordings, videos, signed affidavits from witnesses and other materials that could be used to blackmail them. If at any time during their Presidency they they decided not follow the plans these puppet masters had already planned out for them then these materials would be used to bring them down.

I cannot think of any other reason why so many drunks, drug users, sex addicts and other deviants have been elected as President of the United States in recent years.

The last few Presidents have all had rumours about drugs, gay sex and even murders or drug importation.

People have come out and said that they were involved in sex acts with them, or pilots have recalled seeing the Bush brothers at an airport when dropping off blow after shipping arms down to Central America (Barry Seal).

Even the President's themselves have admitted to taking drugs (whether they inhaled or not).

Of the latest three Presidents we have the following acts being attibuted to them by various investigators and witnesses. These are all acts that could be used to blackmail them.

  • Obama (coke, weed, gay sex, birth certificate, links to Islam)
  • George Bush (coke, drink, pot, gay sex in the White House)
  • Bill Clinton (coke importer, pot smoker - although he claims he didn't inhale! Plus a string of dead people behind him, many who committed suicide with two gun shots to the head! And of course all the sexual acts and infidelity)

Lest you think I am being hypocritical I have no problem with drug use, gays or people following Islam (as long as they are not limiting womens rights, chopping hands off or blowing people up due to Allah's will.)

Murder on the other hand or importing drugs is of course another level altogether.

Plus we all know what the members of the secret society Skull n Bones have to do when they get initiated. Members who include many ex Presidents and powerful officials.

Apparently they lie naked in an open coffin and masturbate whilst the other members all stand around them watching and the new inmate recalls every sexual partner they have had. Whether this is true or not (it is a secret society) it would add many more Presidents to this list.

I have said this many times before, especially when it becomes apparent that the new President is going to break every election pledge they had promised the public on the campaign trail.

What happened to all the "hope and change" Obama promised us?

The end to wars, restoring our civil liberties, closing Gitmo, punishing the previous criminal occupants of the White House for their illegal wars and breaches of international treaties on war crime.

The only thing that could explain it is that either Obama just blatantly lied on the campaign trail or he was blackmailed into following a certain neo-con, pro-war, pro-Israeli, anti-civil liberty line once he was elected.

Apparently 3 out of 10 men are homosexual yet there are hardly any openly gay members of Congress. Why is that? Is the Congress somehow different from the rest of society or is it full of people who have hidden lives and risk exposure at any moment by someone with enough power to expose their hypocrisy?

I just got sent this recording of Bill Hicks on Twitter and I think he sums it up perfectly. As I always say - satire and comedy is sometimes the only way reality can be conveyed to the public without getting a bullet in your head for doing so.



View the original article at www.darkpolitricks.com

Friday, 25 January 2013

My own thoughts on the American love of guns and the 2nd Amendment


My own thoughts on the American love of guns and the 2nd Amendment

By Dark Politricks

After all the furor of the last few weeks and the Sandy Hook shootings and the media debate afterwards what I want to know is what level of tyranny do Americans feel is enough to break the barrier and make their cherished 2nd Amendment useful.

As we are constantly told the 2nd Amendment is not so Americans can go hunting ducks with M16's or use their AK47's for shooting tin cans off the garden wall - no it's for preventing an over reaching, tyrannical government from taking control of their country.

As Thomas Jefferson said in 1803:
"None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important."
There are many levels to this debate and you can go on many tacks including:

1. American citizens have voted for the Congressmen and President that has then taken away their civil liberties. Therefore in a democracy the majority have spoken and it is their own fault for participating in their own loss of liberty and  freedom.

2. Obama is in no way like Hitler, Mao or Stalin. They just declared their laws and the deed was done. They didn't have to battle for years in the Congress and Senate to get a health-care plan watered down and then passed after multiple compromises with political opponents. If Obama was truly a dictator he would have just clicked his fingers and used one of the "signing statements" to make "it so", so to speak. A dictator doesn't give in to an elected body he just says what he wants and it gets done.

3. For personal reasons I wouldn't like to live in a country full of guns. For one I would probably be dead, in a wheelchair or in prison by now after my teenage tearaway years. The other is that I know in the UK, although more violent than the USA (as a recent study showed) at least when we fall out of the bars drunk we fight with our fists and not guns. With our love of alcohol and a plentiful supply of guns we would see every town high street full of dead bodies every weekend. That's not even thinking about our bent dodgy police who I have seen on more than one occasion batter someone for no good reason. Bart Transport Police incidents would be occurring every day and I am thankful I have managed to fight our cops with my fists after they have attacked a young girl with batons just for walking out of a club with a beer, and didn't end up with a bullet in my back. They knew they were in the wrong and 12 of us were let go without charge in the morning all gun shot free. Our criminals are even having to rent guns due to the short supply and most guns used in crimes have already been used in previous crimes and are only re-activated de-commisioned guns - likely to go off in your own hand as it is to fire properly anyway.

4. America has the most sophisticated and well equipped armed forces in the world. Despite the wishes of the founding fathers that there would be no standing army during peace time it seems the USA has got round this by engaging in a period of permanent war. The armed forces have replaced the militias and does any American think their handgun or automatic would take down an Apache helicopter if they turned on the citizens? What level of weapon should a citizen have anyway? Where does it say they can only have certain types of guns and not RPG's or even anti-aircraft weapons? Where is the line drawn?

However ignore all that and just think that YOU ARE ALREADY LIVING UNDER TYRANNY!
Therefore why crow on about the real reason of the 2nd Amendment when you have done NOTHING to stop the rise of tryany over the last 10 years.

Ever since 9.11 you have:
Therefore if you don't think that a few of these facts, out of many others I could have listed,  on their own reach the bar of tyranny that you are so fond of protecting then what level does the bar have to be raised for you to use to the 2nd Amendment as you see it designed?

Either stop voting for scoundrels and liars OR take people like Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Dennis KucinichGary Johnson, Jill Stein and many other politicians seriously.

These are just a few people from all ends of the political spectrum who believe the US has already entered this realm of tyranny in which the CIA/NSA, banksters and warmongers have already won over the common person and that serious reform is needed to roll back this Amerikan police state.

Either there is no level it can be raised to and you will accept all forms of tyranny and you just need to admit that you really really like your guns and just shooting shit. OR you honestly believe in the 2nd Amendment.

If it's the latter then I really want to know - what will it take for you to do something?


View the original article "What level of tyranny will it take for Americans to make use of the 2nd Amendment" at the main site www.darkpolitricks.com