Facebook Plugin Might Stop You Reading My Articles
By Dark Politicks
Tonight I did what I used to do when my own server was up and running quite a lot, and that was search on Google for sites that were linking to me.
You can just put site: [sitename] into Google or many other search engines search box and it will return a list of sites that mention the site you have listed.
So I did a search for site: darkpolitricks.com and had a peruse at my leisure to see what BS had been written about me.
Of course I am a Russian Agent that pushes evil ex-commie propaganda on you all, that seems like a given from some of the sites I looked at. It must be due to me not pushing the "lets have a war with Russia"neo-con/neo-liberal line that seems to wash over much of the US governing elite at the moment.
Hey, I admit it. I don't want to burn to a crisp in a nuclear holocaust. I do apologise to any blogger out there that thinks I have a pro-Russian bias.I just don't believe Russia wants a nuclear war, and think you're very stupid if you do want one.
However, what really upset me is when I found my name on a list on a 911 conspiracy site such as http://911blogger.com/news/2016-11-30/list-initial-set-sites-reliably-echo-russian-propaganda. It is using the same list I found on many other sites claiming I am a "useful idiot" or "Russian Disinfo Agent" just because I do things like stick up for Gaza, tell you the history of CIA drug smuggling, and dare tell the history of the Donbass before the war many MSN Sites believe started with Putin's invasion early 2022.
However, I was writing about 9.11 inconsistencies and conspiracies back in the 2000's when I had free hosting at my company. Here are some articles, forget the dates, I have been moved from hosting company to server so many times they are meaningless.
Unfortunately, I posted an article on my site about a Russian missile called the sunbeam or sunburst or something I believe. It was a missile that could beat all US Aircraft carrier defences and one that skimmed across the ocean inches from the sea at Mach 2 to avoid detection. The US had tried to buy some from Russia but was refused only for Russia to sell some to China.
Within an hour of the article going up my webmaster at work came over panicked with a copy of an email he had received. A Cease and Desist warning letter to take the article down ASAP, with a long list of US DOD departments at the bottom such as the US Army, US Airforce, US Marines etc etc.
My webmaster honestly shat his pants and kept looking out of the windows for black helicopters waiting for Mossad to rope down and kill me in plain view. It was funny to watch but my site lost its free hosting and I ended up having to pay stupid money just to host my site on its own as on the server at work my blog was getting more visits than all the other company sites we hosted combined, and that was with me blocking 45% of all traffic from spambots, hack bots and brand bots that just crawl constantly trying to see if anyone is talking about them.
I just don't get why my little blog is on a list with big well-known sites such as informationclearinghouse.info, infowars.com, and presstv.com to name just three. How did this professor find me, am I already on some sort of ban list so that they found me through that, who knows but I take it as given I am already being monitored somehow, from afar from the Australian ECHELON site, or maybe I need to peel back the sticking tape on my webcam so someone at GCHQ or MI5 can watch my lovely mug as I type?
There used to be a page that talked about a Facebook Plugin designed to warn users if they click on a link taking them to one of these 559+ websites. It was a 3-year-old article, and the old link doesn't show the article, but then again my Facebook page for this site has been removed, my main Twitter account blocked, and I have had social media sites and communities removed in the blink of an eye without any consultation before so who knows what the kind Samaritan who apparently complied the list thinks of me?
It seems that the good egg who compiled the list is, Melissa Zimdars, an assistant professor of Communication and Media at Merrimack College. It is none other than she, who and I quote"compiled a list of the most egregious offenders".
I doubt she even knows who I am, however then again if I am on 2 different lists and can't get into the US, I am probably on some sort of no-fly list. I applied for a US visa and was denied, before 9.11 I had gone to Boston, USA twice within a year all with no problem, whilst working for a big International IT company.
If you get blocked by a subscription bar and don't want to be tracked or turn BRAVES sheilds down, or turn off ADblocker extensions you can do some simple client-side hackery in the DOM by removing classes on the element ("Open Developer Tools > Select The Element -> Edit it as HTML -> Remove Classes and inline styles until the block is gone and you can read the page).
Citing a report from some group called PropOrNot listing more than 200 web sites that supposedly pushed Russian propaganda routinely to more than 15 million Americans, the Post – without irony – declared that somehow constituted "scientific evidence" of Russian election-tampering!
So not only am I a pawn in the game being played between Russia and NATO/US with cover from other countries willing to break international law when they cannot get a UN resolution to invade a country, I am also part of the Russiagate conspiracy hoax that stopped Hillary Clinton getting into office.
Well although I am happy to be considered worthy enough to stop a psychotic killer and war-mongering liar get into the Presidency, I didn't do much apart from print the truth back then, something that was written off as Russian disinfo, and could have swayed the election Trumps way but all big social media sites were blocking what we all now know was a real story of corruption e.g the news on Hunter Bidens laptop.
Apparently, despite Russiagate being debunked a hundred and one times, and Clinton officials and lawyers being interviewed and arrested by the FBI for making up false claims, in which fake info based on rumours was given to ex UK spy Christopher Steele, who then compiled a dossier that they then used to "prove" Donald Trump was a Russian agent with a love of prostitutes and pee parties, people still believe this narrative. This is why I have my site to give people the facts other sites don't.
However it has later come out that due to her narcissistic temperament the "Russia did it", claim was literally made up when Hillary Clinton found out she had lost to Trump, someone she actually helped persuade to run for President as she thought she could easily beat him and carry on the Obama administration that helped bring slave markets back to Libya and funnelled guns from there to Syria, and al-Qaeda and ISIS terrorists to try and other throw President Assad.
This is another site with my domain mentioned multiple times, the backlinks don't work as the people are obviously copying and pasting from other sources, and don't bother putting the http:// in front of my site's name to get you here, but the SEO gains would have been nice seeing I am being shadow banned and articles that used be at the top of Google are slipping down and down the page.
Well, to be honest, I feel honoured to be considered a threat somehow to weak minds, Melissa. It seems I am worthy enough to be on this list along with such evil doers as the Drudge Report, Russia Today, and of course the rabid, evil points of view from Antiwar.com. Plus of course, I get to say I am on a ban list with Alex Jones, one of my first conspiracy heroes back in the day he used to rant and rave at the camera like a loon in need of Largactil LOL.
Sometimes I just feel that if a site is not on a list like the ones I have shown you they are not doing enough to fight the establishment narrative and give people an opposing point of view to consider. Surely if you host a show called Redacted, which I do watch, you should be on a ban list along with me, Alex Jones, Natural News, and RT.com. Come on what does it take for new shows that get more viewers than MSN outlets that dare speak the truth about the Nord Stream pipe bombings to get put on our naughty list?
I also found this list of raw site URLs https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BigMcLargeHuge/opensources/master/sources/sources.csv which had me labelled down for "bias" and "conspiracy". Well I don't know what my bias is, but if it's that I am against a 3rd nuclear war, hate fake current and historical narratives and I'm not a "co-incidence theorist" then yes those labels are correct.
It seems this core list has been copied, and amended in some cases across numerous blogs claiming to have a list of "fake news sites", or "sites to be careful reading", whatever that means. If it's that you might find an alternative and possibly more correct view of an event than those spouted by the mainstream media outlets then yes.
I did find it amusing on the site to find under the category "State Run" just the two sites from the countries the US is currently pushing its propaganda for war with, Russia Today and Iran's Press TV.
What I want to know is where was the BBC? You cannot get a more state run organisation than the BBC, a news broadcaster that has the backing of the government in forcing all live TV viewers to fork out over £150 per year to pay for a licence fee that funds the BBC's reporting.
Therefore it is something I expect, to be labelled a conspiracy theorist just because I don't believe in physics that says an aluminium plane cannot fly at 550mph just inches above the ground and punch it's way through 3 rings of re-enforced concrete as supposedly happened at the Pentagon on 9.11. If I threw an empty can of coke at my bedroom wall would you expect it to just bounce off or go directly through it as if it had been the weight of a rock with some Semtex attached?
Oh and you must call me anti-Semitic for daring report what many US news stations did on the day of 9.11 about the "dancing Israelis", flicking lighters and positioned where no-one else would know to be, filming the first plane hit the Twin Towers. Known Mossad agents who were released by the FBI without charge and went onto an Israeli TV show to claim that they were, "just documenting the event".
And I must be a "hate speech" site for daring to talk about how Israel is assassinating hundreds of Palestinians at the fence that divides them from their old stolen homes. Or how the Mossad stole British passports to use in their assassination of a Hamas leader in Dubai, or show the YouTube video recording of two IDF soldiers shooting 9 bullets into the back of an injured US citizen, Furkan Dogan, on their high seas attack on the Mavi Marmara.
Then of course I must fall into the most evil category at all as well. No-one can point out that Auschwitz itself has decreased the number of people that died within it's rebuilt walls from 6 million down to under a millionwithout being a blatant liar and holocaust denier. I guess the people running the camp, and the historians who have lowered the number from a round perfect 6 million, a number that is stated in the Torah as the number of Jews who must die before they can return to Israel, must fall into the same category as me?
So what do to if these blogs and sites are correct, and my site is on these lists to be considered so dangerous as to warn anyone visiting that it's not a reliable source?
Well what we need is a real "Alternative News" search engine. I did attempt creating one on my old site, I basically just returned Google's results as DuckDuckGo.com does through a proxy server to remove all the trackers, and then I had a list of sites such as the BBC, MSBC, CNN and other "authoritative news sources" that I removed from the results.
However that server is not running anymore and I doubt anyone out there is going to create a real #altnews search engine. I tried creating one using Googles Search Engine tools that used to be at the top of the page but then Google took it down, along with all my ad revenue from them and I am left with nothing.
I can only try my best to use what I can, I am probably on the way out in my 40's but with several chromic severe conditions that have seen me spend a week per month in the local hospital for the last 3 months, and a month stint in August last year and another week in June 2001, all after I took that evil AstraZ jab. I didn't want it but my parents live local and wouldn't even see me unless I took an LFT test and sent them a picture of the result.
However they were nice enough to give me COVID last month, and whilst in hospital for this months stint (I only got out two days ago), I was in a bay where everyone got COVID and moved. I was the only one that didn't get it probably due to having anti-bodies still in me.
Still I had to ask for a test despite the whole bay having COVID apart from me. I had to really kick off, go through 3 nurses and a matron and demand one from a doctor just to get a negative result. The new hospital policy says you only get a test if you are showing symptoms well when I had COVID my temp was 34.1C, not exactly steaming, and plus it takes days to show symptoms anyway.
I just cannot believe last month when I was in hospital they were trialling a new computer system called EPIC where QR codes were scanned before any meds given out and this month they were already calling it an EPIC failure and printing everything out on paper as it was easier to use.
Hey, what's another £20bn down the drain trying to modernise the NHS and put everything on computer. The last £20bn system was a mess and never used, and this one will be the same. We would have got a better return sending it over to Ukraine for the Russians to blow up on delivery but then that is another post! Go have a read, I have a lot of coverage of the Donbass war on this site, and share it with your friends.
What I would do be a dumb sheep again and not know the things I do!
I hate to say this but please donate if you can, I am doing this on my own, without funding and I am on ban lists and no fly lists for taking the time to write these articles.
I just watched this video on the Internet about how it is not "real" anymore, how we cannot even tell the difference between automated content and real people commenting.
I know from my old job as a computer programmer that BOTS were ruling the net years ago. I had a whole business that was totally automated. I went on holiday for 2 weeks and came back and it was still running smoothly. Sending seemingly personalised emails sent out to members with randomised content each day to make it seem as if it had been written personally each day, new news articles that had been automatically created on my site before being sent out to the various social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn. All with different messages for each platform or account depending on the content contained within the article.
With the ability now to fake create people so that they can appear in videos and you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between a real person and a computer generated one, how would you know if that YouTube video you were watching was real or not?
With AI on the increase and algorithms designated to remove or demote people who say the wrong thing from social media groups or whole sites. We are living in an echo chamber where to get that rush of endorphins that only a Like or Thumbs Up gives people when they post something, and then check on it's progress every 5 minutes. You can easily see why people would follow the status quo and not say something outside of the box that the establishment deems un-expectable if they wanted to keep getting that rush. If they want to be accepted they will stick with the pervasive point of view and never go near something that may contradict it.
It is the reason that site like mine and many others are on the 550 (ban list), created by some US professor who has labelled us as fake news, conspiracy or Russian propaganda. All because we speak our own points of view without following establishment narratives.
I have seen my own site which used to be top ranked in Google for many articles such as "A Guide To No Comment Interviews" and "Who Owns The Bank Of England" and many others slip down the rankings since Google changed their algorithms to promote more mainstream media than alternative news.
We have all seen the kids out for parties who spend more time taking selfies and tapping away on their phones, telling people about the "great time they are having" online, rather than actually enjoying that time without their phones. Can you really believe this new generation would stray outside the lines and say something that might be controversial and be rewarded with a thumbs down or dislike?
No they are all addicted to the buzz they get from a Tik Tok video getting comments or a Facebook post being liked. It would be unthinkable for them to step outside the social norms and say something rebellious.
We have all seen the "I am not a Robot" forms across the web, where you tick the box and then pick squares with traffic lights in, or busses. However these are totally beatable by clever programmers, using OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and more modern techniques. Working at an OCR company was my first job out of college oh 20 years ago, I can only imagine what strives they have made in being able to recognise various items, people and images, from video or pictures content they have nowadays. Just look at Facebook, I tried uploading a picture of the wound in my leg after spending a month in hospital, where half my thigh was cut out, and they nearly banned me for posting content containing violent images!
Flesh coloured analysis prevents images of naked people being uploaded on certain sites and I have had warnings due to pictures of people in skimpy clothes from Google whose automated analysis thought too much flesh was on display.
So who really knows whether the post you are reading on Reddit or Facebook was actually created by an automated account or a real person. Can you really tell me you know 100% that it you can tell the difference?
The algorithms that keep you contained in echo chambers to re-enforce your current view, or try to group you with others of the same mind-set, rather than challenge your perspective and beliefs, is the current state of play.
I remember going to my first job up London when the Internet was pretty new, chat rooms were all the rage, and I could search and find websites and material that has all been banned and blacklisted nowadays.
It was a time of freedom and people really thought that the web would change our way of thinking. Instead we were all frogs in boiling pans of water, and slowly over time as the parts of the web were chipped away we didn't notice until it was too late and Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and all the other big platforms became places where you had to watch what you said or else you were banned.
I have had multiple Facebook, Google, YouTube and Twitter accounts closed on me, even going back 8 years when my first Facebook page was instantly deleted on the same day YouTube and Google deleted my channel and G+ group (when they existed). All I can say is to use the alternative sites that have been created, although with much less content, than the pro establishment silicon valley giants.
Who is even going to find a site like mine that will ask them to change their thinking on historical events, war mongering politicians and other topics that the papers don't even bother with anymore?
Unless someone links to my site, or they use the search engine I have put together at the top that only searches sites on the 550 list will find #altnews that will make them think and challenge their minds. I encourage you all to use it and embed it on your own sites.
The code is below, just add it to the top of your blog or site.
The new priests in the 4th industrial revolution are the big tech companies that control the information age. We are no longer allowed to make our own minds up about a subject or whether or not to take medical procedures, the big tech companies will stomp out any view that doesn't reflect the establishment views.
With Facebook supporting the Democrats by almost $500 million, and Google being funded and helping the CIA, we are now living in a world where the establishments views must conform to the political agenda of the elite.
With outspoken views being wiped off the web, and the de-ranking or cancelling of our free speech on the tech companies that have become the public speaking squares. The new high priests are back.
This video by the excellent political and UFO researcher Richard Dolan is all about the new priest hood.
Our current global revolution seeks to undo the last 500 years of individual autonomy and freedom of conscience. Those were prizes we have had since the Protestant Reformation and the Enlightenment.
Now our digital world is dominated by the new priests i.e: Big Tech corporations who are here to permit or deny information to you (and from you) as they see fit. The plan is not simply to take away your autonomy but to deny you even the right to it. And this is not separated from the reality of the UFO/UAP phenomenon. No, it has powerful connections to it.
For the home of exclusive content from author, historian, and radio host Richard Dolan. Join his member site here: http://richarddolanmembers.com/
Everything You Can Imagine We Already Know How To Do....
By Dark Politricks
Lockheed Skunk Works director says we can take ET home
As recently admitted by the DOD and the Pentagon that UFO's or UAP's are a reality and are regularly spotted by Naval and Air Force crossing our skies and waters, it is fitting to hear these words from one of the developers of top secret planes and probably other craft for the US Government.
Ben Rich the head of Lockheed Skunkworks who developed the Stealth Fighter plus many other known and unknown top planes for the US Military was quoted shortly before his death that:
“We already have the means to travel among the stars but these technologies are locked up in Black Projects…and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do.”
“We now have the technology to take ET home. No, it won’t take someone’s lifetime to do it. There is an error in the equations. We know what it is. We now have the capability to travel to the stars.” – Ben Rich shortly before his passing.
He was also asked how UFO propulsion functioned and his reply was remarkable. “Let me ask you. How does ESP work?”
The man asking the question of Mr. Rich said – “All points in time and space are connected?” Ben Rich then replied, “That’s how it works!”
There has been more than one confirmation of Ben Rich’s words on the subject of UFOs or UAP's as the Pentagon and DOD are now calling them after the release of a 700 page report on them to Congress and a 3 page heavily redacted report to the public.
Here is one:
William Hamilton wrote, “Rich Andrews was a close personal friend of Lockheed’s “Skunk Works” CEO Ben Rich, the hand-picked successor of Skunk Works founder Kelly Johnson and the man famous for the F-117 Nighthawk “Stealth” fighter, its half-pint prototype the HAVE BLUE, and the top secret F-19 Stealth Interceptor. Before Rich died of cancer, Andrews took my questions to him. Rich confirmed:
There are two types of UFOs — the ones we build, and ones THEY build. We learned from both crash retrievals and actual “Hand-me-downs.” The Government knew, and until 1969 took an active hand in the administration of that information. After a 1969 Nixon “Purge”, administration was handled by an international board of directors in the private sector.
Richard Dolan, author of the UFO's and the National Security State, and an investigator of UAP's/UFO's for decades released a video regarding the classified part of the report that we were not allowed to see.
However even with these comments from probably one of the builders of UAP's for the US Government and the release of a 700 page report on them to Congress how many people actually have heard this news?
Our mainstream news is failing and it is no wonder people turn to alternative news, which is slowly getting cleansed off the web and public spheres of talk on the Internet e.g Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, with even the head spokes person for the Biden administration today saying that if someone is banned from one online site they should be banned from all of them.
Jen Psaki just suggested that people spreading misinformation be banned from other/all platforms if they're banned from one. pic.twitter.com/SlNXJTXi0I
Social Media Censor Joe Biden Lies and Son's Email's Exposing Links With The Chinese Communist Party
By Dark Politricks
If you have been getting all your news from Facebook or Twitter lately then you probably won't have heard about the massive news related to Democratic Presidential candidateJoe's Biden's son Hunter.
Not only are the two sites censoring the story despite allowing stories about Trump to be re-tweeted and liked, but this goes against the norms of a free society where potential voters should know everything about the crook they are about to vote in.
However these social media companies are using the excuse which is based in unfounded claims
that the news is based on hacked data and therefore they are not
allowing access to it. However Twitter and Facebook have both allowed stories in the past based on info from hacked sources, such as WikiLeaks, Snowden's revelations about NSA surveillance and Hillary Clinton's emails the last election.
Therefore their now self righteous act as controllers of what news is broadcast on their system will only inflame the debate about free speech and what social media is and is not responsible for publishing.
In a free society information should be allowed to flow and people should be allowed to make their own minds up on it. If Twitter and Facebook are indeed to become "publishers" then this leaves them open for claims of libel if anything printed on there sites is found to be based on lies and fake news.
The concept of a "free speech zone" where anyone can post anything and not leave the websites who allow their posts to be viewed liable for the information seems to be dying slowly. This is causing many people to leave sites that censor and de-rank video's and stories to other sites like Minds.com and Bitchute.com.
Whether it is Hillary or Obama, Biden or Trump, all these puppets have masters, and all of them have dirty secrets they want to hide. These secrets are obviously used by the true masters of the country to control their candidate. However despite revelations about normal dirty politics, there will always be deeper darker secrets that the Presidents selected to become POTUS have held over their heads to do the bidding of the deep state.
Despite the New York Post posting stories about Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and his "lost" laptop, which he apparently left in a computer repair shop only for the owner to offer it to the FBI, and then when they were not interested, he gave it to Trump's attorney Rudolph Giuliani. Many papers and online sites have claimed the news to be "unverified". This does not mean it is not true. If it were lies, why have the Biden's not sued the NYP?
Not only do these emails show complicity in Hunter and his father getting involved with the Chinese Communist party, taking money for sitting on a Ukrainian energy company, Burisma's board, and for receiving money for introducing Joe to foreign agents / businessmen.
One email is shown that says:
Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together.It's realty [sic] an honor and pleasure
This is something Joe has repeatedly claimed was a lie, but the disk is full of emails suggesting that he peddled influence with his father as well as more personal photos showing Hunter smoking crack, and having sex. To me this is nothing special, many people struggle with drugs and demons, whether they are poor, rich, powerful or unknown.
He struggles, like many Americans. He’s in recovery, like many Americans. When both father and son talk about it, it’s without shame.
However when these people are in positions of power like previous drug
abusing Presidents such as Bill Clinton, George W Bush and Obama, it
does open them up to blackmail.Both by other countries in the know and by the deep state who knows all you do and when you do it.
The real problem is the fact that the FBI didn't seem interested in
this information that Obama's Vice President was engaging with members
of the Chinese Communist party. The one country that if there were to be a war tomorrow the US would be firing nukes across the Pacific at an enemy that has spent years and billions to steal data, reverse engineer weapons and hack their way into US companies for political control and monetary gain.
Just look at the Coronavirus, the Chinese obviously don't care much about the people of Wuhan who it seems more likely was a real life test scenario for the COVID19 strain developed at their germ warfare laboratory than an accident. I do find it very strange whilst the whole of the world is some form of lock-down and police state like control that one major city in China suffered from COVID whilst Beijing and Shanghai somehow managed to escape the extreme measures implemented in Wuhan and the rest of the world.
Back to the email scandal. Apart from the contents of the son of the Vice Presidents computer, the more worrying question is why the FBI didn't do anything when the shop keeper offered to hand the laptop to them. Were they scared of another "email" scandal like the previous election or were they just being good sections of the "deep state", protecting the person they want in power. Or maybe on a lesser level like James Comey, they just didn't want to cause another shit storm so close to the election unlike 2016 when the investigation into Hillary was closed and then re-opened just before the election. Maybe they just wanted to swerve this nightmare so close to an election altogether.
If you haven't heard anything about, it and why would you if you haven't been reading the NYP, and searching for news online despite Twitter and Facebook blocking access to posts related to the story then you should check these two Sky News stories out. One is about the censorship, the other is an interview with Steve Bannon about the claims of peddling influence and contact with his father to foreign business men and links to the Chinese Communist Party.
Utter disgrace, Twitter, Facebook censor Hunter Biden story
Joe Biden's son emailed shop owner about hard drive to 'get it back': Former Trump chief
Have a watch and tell me what you think. Will it affect your vote in the
election or is just another case of a corrupt politician doing what
they do. Also should social media companies be deciding what we can and cannot read about, especially a story about drugs sex and lies, peddling political influence and a potential Presidents links to the Chinese Communist Party?..
Google can crack any attempt to use their widgets to search out the box but you can help me?
By Dark Politricks
Recently I have had to revert back to a "Google" search widget, one which hardly includes any of the sites I had set it to search from, when you try to think outside the GoogleBox by getting "9.11" or "Syrian War" news.
Not just from sites not recommended as "authority safe" but actually listed as "Fake News" appearing on a list of 550+ sites including mine, compiled by a US Professor to let Facebook automatically flag URLs posted in Direct Messages and Google to not include them in their results.
The top answer I get using this Google widget which is only supposed to search sites I WANT, are of course https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attack, a site about new release of DEBIAN??, and of course the very anti-authortarian https://news.sky.com.Neither site I listed in the clearly labelled box to enter sites you only wanted to search.
Of course this is not just limited to Google preventing you see what you want but even messengering freinds on Facebook something containing a banned link causing an instant block as those sites violate their Community Standurds.
Try it open a Facebook Messenger Chat and just enter the domain name of Veteranstoday.com and see if your message gets sent to you friend. Here is what I get when I try to send 3 links from the "banned list" to a friend and then remember that conspiratorial thought police that would never happen, and how evil Google was to help China install their Internet Firewall preventing Chinese users from accessing the whole web.
When China got Google to break their own "ideology" to "do no evil", if they even ever believed in that fake motto it was to cover their real one, "do whatever to get rich" and of course help the MIC who seeded your start-ups with black money, by creating the strongest firewall for a country as of yet seen. The western liberal nations all lambasted them, that is before countries like, Australia, UK, and many others implemented similar situations. Well what did we all do?
We are still crying "Human Rights Abuses". The Chinese public must be able to access the Internet without censorship. Especially with the #COVID19 virus, the photos of dead bodies were top news, and now with the sudden emergence of people after 3 months of lock-down from Wuhan, the photos, tweets and videos kept alive by Chinese protestors, to only be taken down then re-posted up again, are retold and retold by CNN and the BBC as some sort of bravery that only the Chinese need to do.
What about our human rights abuses?
Just think!
What are we not being told, or not able to access because Facebook, Google and the Silicon Valley/MIC nexus is preventing alternative narratives to the stories that our establishment broadcasters are peddling us. What are they hiding, well just try looking and then you might get a clue or too.
Try searching some of the sites that on the banned list or passing them over social media networks owned by the 3 letter agencies and see what you can and cannot discuss without being instantly labelled a crackpot for having a theory outside the main stream though.
Sheep who read their daily paper full of death gloom and how we must all follow the most stringent anti liberty rules since WWII. News constantly on the TV and Radio, breaks in popular TV shows for Oxbridge Etonian Toriesm to tell us to all stay inside and not go out to "Save the NHS". Well maybe the NHS wouldn't need saving if you hadn't been planning on privatising it, preventing fair pay for junior doctors forced to work 90 hour weeks and allowing all your masonic friends to get bids in whilst the time is right.
Are we in a Police State of our own invention or just too scared to ask "why"?
I have the code for a "Super Search Engine", one that will search multiple sources, remove duplicate URLS and only allow URLS on a "Whitelist" or in this cases Facebook's "Banned List" to appear.
I can place it behind Cloudflare to reduce bandwidth and hide remote IPs, I can create widgets to it for people to embed into blogs to get only "banned" news.
If I had the money I would do it myself but I don't. What I do have are the coding skills to get something like this going. Start it and let someone run off with it. I don't really care who owns it I just would like a search engine that would ONLY search sites they are told to for news they most certainly have listed even if it's ranked on page 500 despite having the best SEO.
Want to help me? Go and donate a few dollars or pounds at a friends site https://www.paypal.me/strictlysoftware and if no-one will donate some server space then maybe I can rent some with enough help.
One for thing is sure, these search engines widget bars to enable you to customise your searches, are pure crap.
However I came here today after showing a Facebook friend my site
and suggested he use the search engine low and behold it's
been ruined by Google so you can't even get any results back from
it any-more!
I don't know why, I created the widget exactly as it told me to do
and I added a number of sites so that when you entered a search only
those sites would be returned. However running a search now for
9.11 or Syria or "War on Terror" now returns ZERO results
when only last month it was returning hundreds of results and only
from the sites on the new ban list.
Even just going to Google search engine and typing in "war
on terror" site:Washingtonpost.com, Telegraph.co.uk, will
only return results from the first site, Washingtonpost.com,
and nothing from the Telegraph, if your lucky, otherwise it
might just ignore the filters, ask if you are human, and then show
irrelevant results.
Google just can't stop fucking over any blog or site that
wants to get out the truth and alternative narratives for you to
think about instead of getting all your news from corporate online
papers, TV news broadcasts and other establishment outlets.
This has really pissed me off. I am either going to try a few new
widgets or when I get some money - donations welcome please - just
go to my friends PayPal account and donate some money, the more I
get the better #altnews search engine I can create, no
Mainstream News BS, no BBC, CNN or Telegraph news articles just
alternative points of view from the best sites out there.
I did it before when I had my own server and I hope to get another
one, it used to return results from multiple search engines, remove
duplicates, and the remove all the establishment sites so that only
real points of view remained. If you want brain washing use Google
and get skewed results that ignore any alternative points of view.
However I am a coder, I have the skills I just need to afford a
small hosting platform to write my search engine. No need for
nightly scrapers, just returning the news from the sites you
all like through proxies with NO CENSORSHIP.
For now I have had to work with the devil and had to replace the DuckDuckgo search engine with a Google version but unfortunately it only allows me to search ten sites for free. Google are always trying to milk money from users in every way they can but then what else do you expect.
Anyway it has 10 sites including this one so if you do a search for 9.11 or False Flag you should get results from some of the sites on the banned list. However what I really want is to make my own search engine again, bit for that I need donations. If anyone can help please so otherwise content like this will go down the drain before long"
So if you cam help me please donate, any amount, no matter how
small will help. With Google and Facebook cracking down on
alternative voices we need a way of getting easy access to all
these sites providing them.
The hashtag I created #altnews for Twitter has really kicked
off and there are thousands of users all searching and tagging
articles with it, this makes me really happy to see Twitter is still
showing results from #altnews but I would really like to make
a proper search engine that will return, blogs, news, Facebook
articles and even tweets
from only #altenews sites
Help please, keep alternative news available for people to search
and find and stop these loonies creating
lists of sites to ban from ever implementing them,
Hillary Clinton Expects Russia to move a Far Left Democratic Member or 3rd Party to "Steal Democratic Votes" to Let Trump Win Again
By Dark Politricks
I must apologise for being off for so long. Severe illness, social issues and sever pain has stopped me from writing and when I do write you must let me get through 3 versions.
The drunken flow of consciousness that spills out from a sudden idea,
The attempt at clean up but still on medication and
Then hopefully the final draft when sober with time on my hands.
This is about the US election coming up soon.
It really cracks me up that here in the UK our politicians can demand and hold a general election bringing in a new parliament within 4 weeks whereas the USA seems to take 2 years of primaries, debates, people dropping out from the 20 odd contenders and then the actual election debates between the orange potential dictator and the ever so hopeful Democrats whose both parties are both supported and funded by the same big Pharma, MIC Armament companies and Health Insurance companies in a fake face off in who will continue the MIC's one world agenda as a front man.
So we have Hillary Clinton, trying to dip her skanky toes into the drinking water of those Democratic supporters who still believe in the honesty and truth of the God Given USA Government, A corporatist octopus, with a deep state that stays in power for decades whether Presidents come and go, even if they seem to always be on the TV political scene unlike the National Security State. Look at Hillary Clinton she came into the White House as the wife of a wandering eye President who had a long history of women claiming rape, sexual assault and affairs going back to when he was Governor of Arkansas.
He was given the Presidency by George H Bush due to his diligence as a Governor of a state that let CIA planes fly into his Mena airport, offload coke to be sold in the inner cities and then loaded up with Guns to be flown back south by pilot like Barry Seal for the Nicaraguan rebels.
It was a funny side note to find when the CIA did some clean up with Pablo Esobar's senior Sicarios and CIA pilots such as Seal with Colombian hit man, that they found the personal phone number of the then Vice President and ex CIA Chief George H Bush in his pocket. Very strange. Then again Ronald Reagan's wife calling out to kids to "Just say no" when offered drugs, when her husband was the biggest importer of cocaine into the country was just more pure US hypocrisy anyway.
The National Security State is full of people who are either too scared to speak out about all the illegal programs they are asked to work on, hacking and illegal wire taps unlike Bill Binney or Edward Snowden who went public, or the others who keep their heads down and ignore all the evidence of severe illegality caused by bribes through such institutions as the "Hillary Foundation". A Clinton plan that has gone from the 80's into the 2000's. A tool so that millions of Uranium could be sold to the Russians and Bill could be given half a million dollar handouts for speeches as a thank you. Pay off, you bet.
Plus there is a lot more that goes against the constitution like illegal assassinations, drones killings or the locking up of Americans without any habeas corpus, illegal wars without the approval of Congress and much much more shenanigans to speak about here.Many are too scared to speak out now that journalists like Max Blumenthal who was arrested for helping delivering water and food to protesters against the Venulzeluan CIA coup that isn't going too well. His site has already been removed from the web > http://maxblumenthal.com/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi.
It seems that there is a war on liberty, free speech, protest, free movement and speaking out against the President in the US at the moment. The problem is we all know that if Hillary dared go for the Presidency again she would lose.
We all know there is little difference between Democrats and Republicans except maybe the Democrats are a bit more crazy and the Republicans see their job as really not doing anything but collecting a paycheck and sucking up to their President.
This is long away from the 50's black and white film where, Russian 3rd columns and a Manchurian candidate is brought in by the Soviets to play the All American, War Hero, Football Star and all good US boy.
No, now the Government is in tatters. The DNC can fraudulently conspire to ensure delegates and super delegates prevent the only person who could have beaten Trump at the last Presidential election, yes your right, Bernie Sanders, from standing again.
He was kept away from the money, the staff, the help and, a controllable security service where the FBI can just be told to go away when a foreign hack has supposedly just been exploited on the DNC servers. Quite a severe crime I would have thought for the FBI to ignore and allow Hillary to get away with.
If they meant the Russians had spent a few grand on Facebook adverts identifying the differences between Americans then maybe they could be let off, but when you have a dead DNC worker such as Seth Rich, shot at night and not even robbed. Then WikiLeaks leader Julian Assange goes on the Bill Maher show and almost broke down, even offering a reward sum for anyone who had knowledge of this crime. Something he has not done before. There has to be cookie crums to follow.
However he knows his history and he also knows the long list of dead bodies going back to Mena, Whitewater, The Presidency and all the other rumours for the long famed Clinton Kill List could have some basis in fact.
Check out the full list and details of why they were killed here. A grand total of 47 if you include Seth Rich.Clinton Kill List.
The Clintons KIll List
1 - James McDougal
2 – Mary Mahoney
3 – Vince Foster
4 – Ron Brown
5 – C. Victor Raiser, II
6 – Paul Tulley
7 – Ed Willey
8 – Jerry Parks
9 – James Bunch
10 – James Wilson
11 – Kathy Ferguson
12 – Bill Shelton
13 – Gandy Baugh
14 – Florence Martin
15 – Suzanne Coleman
16 – Paula Grober
17 – Danny Casolaro
18 – Paul Wilcher
19 – Jon Parnell Walker
20 – Barbara Wise
21 – Charles Meissner
22 – Dr. Stanley Heard
23 – Barry Seal
24 – Johnny Lawhorn, Jr.
25 – Stanley Huggins
26 – Hershell Friday
27 – Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case
The Following people had information on the Ives/Henry Case:
What would be easier, than the whole #Russiangate conspiracy?
Getting some Ukrainian hacker to hack into DNC servers, extract embarrassing things about Hillary and even more emailed about Podesta and his sick ideas about Spirit Cooking and #Pizzagate unless you want a good spanking by the silicon MIC DNC nexus, which seemed to control everything at the last election.d Then slowly over international phone networks extract whole servers, or parts of them. Only to just pretend to be someone else with ties to an old hacker, before sending it once again to WikiLeaks (Iceland isn't it?), just for them to expose it and take the blame as Julian Assange will surely be doing soon.
However it would have been a lot simpler for a DNC worker, hard to the grindstone, who stumbled across nefarious DNC play sheets, sick emails, ways to ensure Hillary would be their Democratic candidate whatever happened due to super delegates to stick in a USB stick, copy the data and then send it over TOR or other ways to WikiLeaks. It would take a lot of time for a foreign hacker to get through all those AWS and Firewalls. However someone inside the building could easily extract the data and walk out with it to hand it over to someone that could expose it. The shame was that somehow he was probably traced or tracked and killed over his discretion to go public with DNC playbook to get Hillary to be the Democratic candidate for 2016.
The problem was that in the 2016 election the Orangutan managed to beat the warmonger.
Trump promised not to start any new wars unlike Obama and Hillary, this didn't go down well with the MIC who make billions from such coups, wars, selling weapons to the government, pretend insurrection's and worse. However the majority of the people liked his message. They wanted jobs back in the USA, and despite troubles with China he is still working on it. They wanted a wall to stop immigrants coming it and despite a slow start he has made progress.
Employment is up and so is the stock market but in reality who cares about stocks than stockbrokers making their own money. They gave Trump constant platitudes, telling him he would be a great President, a modern day Sirus, a new kind of Republican leader, and of course how thick and luscious his blond hair is.
Of course he is a total numpty, a man void of self awareness, who thinks of himself in terms of grandeur and historical lines going back to Jewish myths of King Syrus and bending over as far as he could for AIPAC and the Israelis happy.
From the Democratic perspective this was all a DNC plan to put the worst idiot up as the Republican nominee, someone the National Security Agencies weren't happy about and someone Hillary could easily beat. However it was not to be and she will be crying into her empty beds pillows for the rest of her life for letting that conman and total tool get away with running the country. How unhappy must she feel inside when she thinks about it.
You know that list that "Conspiracy Theorists" believe in. The one that claims almost 50 people are all dead who were somehow related to the Clinton's, Whitewater, Mena Airport, CIA coke imports, Bill's Affairs (and Hillary's Lesbian ones too), and people who may have just have over heard too much. We may not have heard the last name yet.
To me it wouldn't surprise me if Tulsi Gabbard on the way home in a car like that scared journalist, was suddenly hacked and then crashed with no way out.
It's not out of the realms of possibility. Bernie is too old to bother to murder and the others haven't attracted Hillary's wrath as much as Tulsi has so far calling her a Russian agent and a Manchurian candidate, with Tulsi replying that she was a chicken hawk, sending soldiers like her to their deaths without a care in the world. Is that not a true statement?
If only the people who wanted the wars would fight them then we would live in a peaceful society, would you ever expect to see Donald Trump in a ring with President Assad, or Hillary Clinton in an arm lock with President Putin?
To me it seems as if Hillary is dipping those dirty death toll toes into a Democratic neo-liberal war mongering offshore manufacturing pool of death, just to see if a late run against maybe Biden might be in the offering. Their DNC rules do state that a compromise candidate can be offered at their convention if needs be.
If only Henry Wallace had got his name up before Truman 60 odd years ago, then maybe we wouldn't have wasted half a century in a pointless cold war, where the rules were fixed and the MIC on all sides were build up so much that the common people were forgotten about, used as donkeys in wars led by Lions, paid a pittance, and both female and male had to fight the authorities, sometimes to the death, just to get reasonable rights, justice and pay for their work.
Anyway this is not a historical article, although I could go on for ages about the wars between the poor and the rich. Hillary Clinton is definitely rich, fact 100%; So is her weakening HIV looking husband who now just needs a new friend now that Jeffrey Epstein apparently hung himself in a cell with sheets too short to reach the ceiling, guards incidentally asleep and his cell mate out for the night.
Well that's what happens when you run an international sex ring of sex slaves for the likes of Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew and the many others he rinsed out for dollars. In this day and age where the rule of Constitutional law doesn't apply anymore in Trumps USA, anything can happen. He could have been killed by a stray pack of Lima's for all we know. What we do know is that the family of Jeffery had their own autopsy carried out which disputed the official autopsy, but then who do you think the Government will take as the official report.
Anyway getting back to the villain of the article, we all know Hillary is backed by her war mongering corporations, non healthy GMO+ foods, expensive HMO companies, and university loan sharks who don't want free college but $100,000's of debt on a student leaving university to pay off (plus interest).
So what more is there for the Democratic Corporatist to love about this ancient hypocrite and liar who probably needs at least 6 body doubles to take on road trips just in case she falls asleep in mid-air again, before hours later kissing a young girl with a supposedly contagious flu like virus.
The Duran
The Duran is a programme I watch on YouTube that has in depth analysis on news of the day, from discussion about Brexit and American politics, to Russian diplomats, their leader Putin, and the seeming escapades he has got the US out of lately despite the Deep State trying to do everything they can to take him down from Military advisers resigning or being sacked for insubordination.
Then there is the whole "Russia Gate" scandal which turned out to be nothing but a farce and probably from the looks of things at the moment, a more Ukrainian Democratic Scandal in which they kept Hillary's private DNC computers, with all the grot, sexual innuendo and spirit cooking from the Podesta emails WikiLeaks managed to put on the open market as well.
I guess it was just another Russian BOT with full knowledge of Podesta's Facebook accounts, the exact same terms used by Paedophiles in the FBI's sex unit where certain pizza toppings meant a different sexual encounter. This "Pizza Code", adult themed pictures and spirit cooking being imprinted all over the files and much much more which led to a Pizza parlour shooting in Washington.
Democratic workers at the DNC really should have had all their computers sealed off, disks duplicated and all log files from their routers taken to be analysed. You never know they may have found it was a lot easier to detect Seth Rich as the worker who inserted a USB stick to download emails before sending them to WikiLeaks than it would have been for a Russian GRU unit to deploy full forces on finding out black southerners don't really appreciate white cops killing them.
Anyway the Duran has some more analysis worth looking into as Clinton, probably with a hired nurse right now injecting some disease into Joe Biden's veins, are working out which of their Democratic allies can be taken out with simple smears of "Communist Stooge", as Jimmy Dore, and Lee Camp were last time. Just 2 comedians who were labelled such in 2016 by main papers as people who want to split the Democratic vote by voting Green.
No it's supposed to be the political parties that come to you and ask what you want and what you can help them with. Hillary just thought that standing there on a stage being booed by half the crowd, a reason she had to hire in fake supporters to chant her name,
How dare she accuse them of getting their listeners to go and vote with their consciousness for once and not what colour your dads favourite jumper was. Susan Suranden is a famous person who was also blamed for Green Party of the United States presidential candidate Jill Stein, a criticism she still has not lived down.
However what is the point in supposedly voting for the left leaning party in the USA when there is literally no difference between the Democrat faux liberals and the Republican neo-con right wingers.
Both want increased spending (above what the US military asked for) in the US Armed forces
Both are backed by huge lobbying companies who are trying to get their clients "face time" and interest in their products accepted by the party.
Both when it comes to war seemingly wet themselves on TV when they see huge mega bombs kill families and kids, all in a country they have no right to be in.
Both, if you can call it that, "left wing" and "right wing" media hacks will surround them at events offering faux pax and fake intel as well as offers to smear their opponents and shine the heavenly light on them.
Both are into private prisons, high medication cost, fuel breaks from tar sand pipe lines.
Both see themselves as "a break from the past", a "middle of the road" candidate who couldn't sway too far either left or right as the country is "fractured" and "needs to come together"
This is despite polls showing that Hillary Clinton will always start polling Trump at 50% but then she will never rise. She will only have figures on a downward trajectory,
This is what seems crazy to me you have in the Democratic Party a variety of congresspeople who are further to the left like Bernie Sanders and others who are pretty far up GOP representatives ass-holes trying to "form unified bonds" and "lets get on together".
Well this time it hopefully won't work as not only will Hillary get stinky fingers when she removes them from the water but her plans to paint US Veteran Tuksi Gabbard as a Russian agent just won't work.
Not only is Hillary a Chicken Hawk, something that Tulsi should use at her in debates over and over, but fighting in the middle east for the US/Israel has always been about stopping Russian influence and leaving the US CIA/MI6/Mossad backed Jihadists, such as ISIL, who they created along with Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, shipping them weapons from the Libyan war / massacre right into their hands.
One thing that can be said for Tulsi is that she has fought in combat whereas Hilary hasn't. She just laughs when the news is presented that Col Qaddafi has been found, sodomised and then killed. It that the sort of psychopathic person you want leading your troops back in DC, and then interviewing straight away how they "Came, they bombed, they killed him".
So we have the horrible choice of Hillary making a late entry, because she just can't get over the fact Doofus Donald beat her the 1st time. She went on an interview explosion over TV to explain how the Russians had done it not her. She was too good not to be President, just not good enough to connect with ordinary people, feel their pain over her last 8 years in recession, joblessness, homelessness, police on white violence, the environment and trying to stop World War 3.
The one good thing about Donald is that he seemed like the rest of the people in the southern red states, He said things he shouldn't have but didn't care. He stayed up until 4am writing text messages, offending world leaders and slagging anyone of who criticises him. However the one thing that he promised on the campaign road, not to start another multitude of wars like Obama and to bring troops home he has attempted,
He hasn't put more soldiers into Syria such as the recently left north east Syrian Turkish borders so that the well funded and armed YPG Kurds who were our allies, once and are know left alone for the Turks to come illegally into Syria, just like the USA and attacks their old title, the PKK, an international recognised terrorist organisation fighting for their own home land across the top of Iraq (another time we left them alone to face Saddam Hussein's gas), Syria and bottom ranges of the mountains where they are bombed constantly by Turkey.
He said quite Right after a tour of NATO countries, when he asked one why they didn't pay more into NATO and got the response "well we thought you were going to sort any trouble out". It probably pissed him off that they were being taken for mugs with only the US and UK paying any decent money into NATO or fighting with them, It was maybe the decision that made him decide to bring US troops home from Syria,
The MIC will be hating this obviously as continuous war means continuous profits. Plans may be a foot to get their neo-con Hillary to make a late entry but he promised not to start anymore wars like Obama, something the media are going crazy about...."Peace...what's that, we fight for our allies no matter how many trillions it adds to the national debt"
However Trump may have had to continue Obama's mess of wars and misery around the globe but at least he didn't start any new wars, and this is why both the Democrats and Republicans are so angry with him for pulling out of Syria. I don't know why, he campaigned on doing so, he has reduced troops and said forcibly that richly armed countries in the Middle East should take care of their own problems and not leave it all up to the US to police all the time,
Why Hillary is going after Tulsi Gabbard who only polls a few percent I don't know.
This an ex war veteran fighting for the highest office in the land, trying to prevent wars not create ever lasting ones. She should know more about wars and fighting them than an ancient chicken hawk like Hillary, who loves starting them but never joining in.
So I hope the following video from the Duran is entertaining in it's knock about between Tulsi and Clinton but I sure hope who supplied the DNC emails before the election is found out as far as I know there has been no investigation into Seth Richs's death.
This either means the deep state, found through a trackable USB stick and computer logs who it was, got the order from the boss Heir Hillary, and took him out removing the one thing that mattered the USB stick.So they could get ahead of it. Trying to claim a Russian would hack the DNC to get the data just to send it to WikiLeaks who then released it seems a bit over kill for me. I just hope Seth gets the justice he and his morals deserved.
Security on USB sticks needs to be drastically improved if this is this face of new sticks. Tiny hidden GPS nodes, code that are automatically inserted into the USB as soon as it's inserted into a new drive so it can be tracked. This world is turning into a technocratic world order, I just hope Russia and China can keep the USA in their place without starting pointless nuclear wars.
Tell me who is more fit to lead the US into military conflict, Hillary Clinton or Tulsi Gabbard in the comments below. A chicken hawk or someone who has made decisions on the battlefield,
I just hope the Democratic party just don't chose Hillary or another psychopath who laughed about the killing of Col.Gadaffi, or Joe Biden whose eye brows may fall off during a debate in between a heart attack recovery as a compromise candidate.
What level of tyranny will it take for Americans to use the 2nd Amendment as intended?
By Dark Politricks
After all the furor of the last few weeks and the Sandy Hook shootings and the media debate afterwards what I want to know is what level of tyranny do Americans feel is enough to break the barrier and make their cherished 2nd Amendment useful.
As we are constantly told the 2nd Amendment is not so Americans can go hunting ducks with M16's or use their AK47's for shooting tin cans off the garden wall - no it's for preventing an over reaching, tyrannical government from taking control of their country.
As Thomas Jefferson said in 1803:
"None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important."
There are many levels to this debate and you can go on many tacks including:
1. American citizens have voted for the Congressmen and President that has then taken away their civil liberties. Therefore in a democracy the majority have spoken and it is their own fault for participating in their own loss of liberty and freedom.
2. Obama is in no way like Hitler, Mao or Stalin. They just declared their laws and the deed was done. They didn't have to battle for years in the Congress and Senate to get a health-care plan watered down and then passed after multiple compromises with political opponents. If Obama was truly a dictator he would have just clicked his fingers and used one of the "signing statements" to make "it so", so to speak. A dictator doesn't give in to an elected body he just says what he wants and it gets done.
3. For personal reasons I wouldn't like to live in a country full of guns. For one I would probably be dead, in a wheelchair or in prison by now after my teenage tearaway years. The other is that I know in the UK, although more violent than the USA (as a recent study showed) at least when we fall out of the bars drunk we fight with our fists and not guns. With our love of alcohol and a plentiful supply of guns we would see every town high street full of dead bodies every weekend, and that's not even thinking about our dodgy police who I have personally seen battering people for no good reason.
4. America has the most sophisticated and well equipped armed forces in the world. Despite the wishes of the founding fathers that there would be no standing army during peace time it seems the USA has got round this by engaging in a period of permanent war. The armed forces have replaced the militias and does any American think their handgun or automatic would take down an Apache helicopter if they turned on the citizens? What level of weapon should a citizen have anyway? Where does it say they can only have certain types of guns and not RPG's or even anti-aircraft weapons? Where is the line drawn?
However ignore all that and just think that YOU ARE ALREADY LIVING UNDER TYRANNY!
Therefore why crow on about the real reason of the 2nd Amendment when you have done NOTHING to stop the rise of tyranny over the last 18 years.
Ever since 9.11 you have:
Been living under Emergency laws that give the President dictatorial like powers.
Seen the removal of Habeas corpus and the introduction of death without judicial oversight on the Presidents say so.
Witnessed laws passed such as the NDAA that allow the President to assassinate or lock up indefinitely US citizens who he believes pose a threat to the country. As the released MIAC documents showed this includes PATRIOTS, Libertarians, Ron Paul supporters, ex-military and people who believe in the primary law of the USA - the constitution. They are all now to be treated as domestic terrorists!
A surveillance state in which you are monitored on and offline all day long. From your car to your home phone, mobile, shopping purchases to all your computer activities, and all without the need for warrant or due process. Numerous systems from TRAPWIRE to the TSA's naked body scanners, CCTV and now mobile radar vans all capturing your journey from home to work and back. All your Internet traffic has been monitored for ages and now your naked body is monitored as well. All this info is now stored and recorded in real time and then logged in huge city sized databases.
The rise of a two tier state between the super rich and everyone else. A country in which if you hang out with the President you can breach privacy laws, hack computers and never face the threat of imprisonment. But, if you are like Aaron Swartz, and don't have the luxury of a huge drug dealing, terrorist bankster operation behind you like HSBC or you don't own Facebook or Google(both companies who have committed similar hacks and many breaches of privacy) - BUT most importantly have ties with the CIA and NSA, plus their owners get to hang out with the President and other big wigs at Davos and Bilderberg. Then you are looking at 50+ years in prison as Aaron was.
It is now provable that if you are too big to fail you are also too big to prosecute. If you are tool cool to bend over to the state security apparatus as Google, Microsoft and other big Internet companies have all done you are okay, but if you don't like Aaron then you are just a target to be taken down in anyway possible.
Permanent war. Even once bin-Laden has been killed you are still content on wasting trillions of borrowed and made up money to fight a people who have never been beaten and in which 92% of these people don't even know about 9.11 or have even heard of the Twin Towers.
They just see you as another invader following on from the Soviets and the British Empire and the dozens of other beaten armies that also failed before them. You won't win in the Stan. I would bet a house on it!
Therefore if you don't think that a few of these facts, out of many others I could have listed, on their own reach the bar of tyranny that you are so fond of protecting then what level does the bar have to be raised for you to use to the 2nd Amendment as you see it designed?
Either stop voting for scoundrels and liars OR take people like Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Dennis Kucinich, Gary Johnson, Jill Stein and many other politicians seriously.
These are just a few people from all ends of the political spectrum who believe the US has already entered this realm of tyranny in which the CIA/NSA, banksters and warmongers have already won over the common person and that serious reform is needed to roll back this Amerikan police state.
Either there is no level it can be raised to and you will accept all forms of tyranny and you just need to admit that you really really like your guns and just shooting shit.
OR you honestly believe in the 2nd Amendment.
If it's the latter then I really want to know - what will it take for you to do something?