Dark Politricks: Thomas Jefferson

Showing posts with label Thomas Jefferson. Show all posts

Friday, 21 December 2018

Terrorism is not an excuse for the loss of our liberties

By Dark Politricks

The war on terror has been used by the UK government as a battering ram to the rights of the citizens of this country. New laws have been passed including 2 new terrorism acts (2000 and 2006) which have restricted free speech, the rights of demonstrators to protest and have given the police new powers of stop and search and lets not forget the 28 days detention and control orders.

Now you may say "well you have nothing to fear unless you have something to hide" which is a bend over attitude that leads to fascism. I am not a terrorist but nor are most people who have been affected by this new age of fighting terrorism.

Its the thin edge of the wedge which has taken advantage of peoples justifiable fears about terrorist attacks to introduce laws that if only applied to real terrorists would be fine however who can forget the 82 year old Walter Wolfgang who was dragged out of the Labour conference for heckling Jack Straw under the terrorism act in 2005. Or what about Gordon Brown invoking the terrorism act to freeze Iceland's bank accounts during 2008?

Just these two acts alone prove how our government intends to use these new powers for reasons other than fighting terrorism.

Once the public has been forced into a mindset that demands protection from unseen shadowy terrorists and that they must be dealt with severely it then allows the government to widen the scope of what actually constitutes terrorism.

One day you are a protester exercising your legal right of protest the next you are a terrorist trying to overthrow the state with subversive acts. Take a look over the pond to see how the US government is trying to class gun owners, ex servicemen and Ron Paul supporters as domestic terrorists.

It seems that the US constitution is slowly being eroded bit by bit. I never used to understand the Americans fascination with their right to bear guns however the more I have read up about Thomas Jefferson and the other founding fathers and their desire to protect the people against the tyranny of government it makes perfect sense. I especially love the following two quotes that Jefferson made:

"No man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

"And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not .warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.... The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

I have come to have a renewed respect for the founding fathers of America and the contemporary patriots who want the US government to return to the constitution. The world would be a quieter and probably safer place if it did.

Even though Jefferson and Washington kicked their British rulers out during the war of Independence us Brits must never forget that the father of the revolution was Thomas Paine an Englishman whose books the Age of Reasonand the Rights of Man had enormous influence on the Age of Enlightenment and the revolutions of France and America.

Two new republics were born that decreed that man had inalienable rights that could not be taken away by government. Therefore when people see their government treating their constitution as "just a piece of paper"as George Bush famously called it and trampling over their rights including the right to bear arms as if their inalienable rights were just an outdated idea that had no place in this century then I can see why they get so upset over the 2nd amendment.

Here in the UK its too late as we are currently a disarmed nation since the massacres of Dunblane and Hungerford took our guns away but then unlike the Americans we never had an inalienable right to bare arms anyway.

In fact although the UK passed the first ever bill of rights in 1689 it was never thought necessary for us to have a written constitution like the French and Americans.

I personally think it would be in our own best interests to draw up our own document as soon as possible. Yes we have the Human Rights act of 1998 which the right wing media decries and complains about almost every other day as something that has been imposed on us from Europe. However ridiculous the examples the Daily Mail and Express use to denigrate this act seem we should never feel that getting rid of that act would be in our best interest.

Civil rights have been hard fought and won through years of battle between state and its populace and any document that tries to enshrine our rights for future prosperity should be cherished and held in high esteem. We should also remember that it was British lawyers that drew up the Europen Convention on human rights in 1950, that the act is based on, after the horrors of the second world war. So we should view this act as yet another example of us Brits bringing civil rights to the world rather than Europe imposing some alien concept on us.

From the Magna Carta in 1215, through to John Lockes and Thomas Hobbes social contract between man and the state through to the first Bill of Rights and then the Human Rights act we Brits have been at the forefront of civil rights and we should not let the fear of terrorism allow any of these hard won rights to be taken away as once gone they will probably not come back unless a Liberal Democrat government gets in power which seems most unlikely.

We are slowly walking down the path to a place that I don't want to call home. When George Orwells 1984 starts to become a commentary on modern times then we must all stop and ask ourselves what the hell is going on.

By Dark Politricks

What level of tyranny will it take for Americans to use the 2nd Amendment as intended?

By Dark Politricks

After all the furor of the last few weeks and the Sandy Hook shootings and the media debate afterwards what I want to know is what level of tyranny do Americans feel is enough to break the barrier and make their cherished 2nd Amendment useful.

As we are constantly told the 2nd Amendment is not so Americans can go hunting ducks with M16's or use their AK47's for shooting tin cans off the garden wall - no it's for preventing an over reaching, tyrannical government from taking control of their country.

As Thomas Jefferson said in 1803:

"None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important."

There are many levels to this debate and you can go on many tacks including:

1. American citizens have voted for the Congressmen and President that has then taken away their civil liberties. Therefore in a democracy the majority have spoken and it is their own fault for participating in their own loss of liberty and freedom.

2. Obama is in no way like Hitler, Mao or Stalin. They just declared their laws and the deed was done. They didn't have to battle for years in the Congress and Senate to get a health-care plan watered down and then passed after multiple compromises with political opponents. If Obama was truly a dictator he would have just clicked his fingers and used one of the "signing statements" to make "it so", so to speak. A dictator doesn't give in to an elected body he just says what he wants and it gets done.

3. For personal reasons I wouldn't like to live in a country full of guns. For one I would probably be dead, in a wheelchair or in prison by now after my teenage tearaway years. The other is that I know in the UK, although more violent than the USA (as a recent study showed) at least when we fall out of the bars drunk we fight with our fists and not guns. With our love of alcohol and a plentiful supply of guns we would see every town high street full of dead bodies every weekend, and that's not even thinking about our dodgy police who I have personally seen battering people for no good reason.

4. America has the most sophisticated and well equipped armed forces in the world. Despite the wishes of the founding fathers that there would be no standing army during peace time it seems the USA has got round this by engaging in a period of permanent war. The armed forces have replaced the militias and does any American think their handgun or automatic would take down an Apache helicopter if they turned on the citizens? What level of weapon should a citizen have anyway? Where does it say they can only have certain types of guns and not RPG's or even anti-aircraft weapons? Where is the line drawn?

However ignore all that and just think that YOU ARE ALREADY LIVING UNDER TYRANNY!

Therefore why crow on about the real reason of the 2nd Amendment when you have done NOTHING to stop the rise of tyranny over the last 18 years.

Ever since 9.11 you have:

Been living under Emergency laws that give the President dictatorial like powers.

Seen the removal of Habeas corpus and the introduction of death without judicial oversight on the Presidents say so.

Witnessed laws passed such as the NDAA that allow the President to assassinate or lock up indefinitely US citizens who he believes pose a threat to the country. As the released MIAC documents showed this includes PATRIOTS, Libertarians, Ron Paul supporters, ex-military and people who believe in the primary law of the USA - the constitution. They are all now to be treated as domestic terrorists!

A surveillance state in which you are monitored on and offline all day long. From your car to your home phone, mobile, shopping purchases to all your computer activities, and all without the need for warrant or due process. Numerous systems from TRAPWIRE to the TSA's naked body scanners, CCTV and now mobile radar vans all capturing your journey from home to work and back. All your Internet traffic has been monitored for ages and now your naked body is monitored as well. All this info is now stored and recorded in real time and then logged in huge city sized databases.

The rise of a two tier state between the super rich and everyone else. A country in which if you hang out with the President you can breach privacy laws, hack computers and never face the threat of imprisonment. But, if you are like Aaron Swartz, and don't have the luxury of a huge drug dealing, terrorist bankster operation behind you like HSBC or you don't own Facebook or Google (both companies who have committed similar hacks and many breaches of privacy) - BUT most importantly have ties with the CIA and NSA, plus their owners get to hang out with the President and other big wigs at Davos and Bilderberg. Then you are looking at 50+ years in prison as Aaron was.

It is now provable that if you are too big to fail you are also too big to prosecute. If you are tool cool to bend over to the state security apparatus as Google, Microsoft and other big Internet companies have all done you are okay, but if you don't like Aaron then you are just a target to be taken down in anyway possible.

Permanent war. Even once bin-Laden has been killed you are still content on wasting trillions of borrowed and made up money to fight a people who have never been beaten and in which 92% of these people don't even know about 9.11 or have even heard of the Twin Towers.

They just see you as another invader following on from the Soviets and the British Empire and the dozens of other beaten armies that also failed before them. You won't win in the Stan. I would bet a house on it!

Therefore if you don't think that a few of these facts, out of many others I could have listed, on their own reach the bar of tyranny that you are so fond of protecting then what level does the bar have to be raised for you to use to the 2nd Amendment as you see it designed?

Either stop voting for scoundrels and liars OR take people like Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Dennis Kucinich, Gary Johnson, Jill Stein and many other politicians seriously.

These are just a few people from all ends of the political spectrum who believe the US has already entered this realm of tyranny in which the CIA/NSA, banksters and warmongers have already won over the common person and that serious reform is needed to roll back this Amerikan police state.

Either there is no level it can be raised to and you will accept all forms of tyranny and you just need to admit that you really really like your guns and just shooting shit.

OR you honestly believe in the 2nd Amendment.

If it's the latter then I really want to know - what will it take for you to do something?

Amerika, A modern day East Germany

By Dark Politricks

The definition of a Police State is:

"A state in which the government exercises rigid and repressive controls over the social, economic, and political life of the people, especially by means of a secret police force."

History shows that mankind has been plagued by authoritarian governments since the dawn of collective governance. We have many instances of governments that fit the definition of a Police State from the East German Stasi, Soviet KGB to the current Chinese government who still utilise whole teams of agents to follow westerners of interest around when they visit the country.

However these countries have all been authoritarian one party states and it has always been presumed that within western democracies the idea of a police state only existed in the nightmares of those sections of society who mistrusted the government no matter what it did.

However with the recent Washington post investigation into the size of the intelligence community within the United States of America it may be successfully argued that the time for nightmares has arrived.

The Washington Post expose looked into the huge expansion of the security services and other intelligence agencies since the attacks of 9/11 and revealed some stunning facts such as:

Some 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counter terrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the United States.

An estimated 854,000 people, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington, D.C., hold top-secret security clearances.

In Washington and the surrounding area, 33 building complexes for top-secret intelligence work are under construction or have been built since September 2001. Together they occupy the equivalent of almost three Pentagons or 22 U.S. Capitol buildings - about 17 million square feet of space.

In case that second point escapes due attention it means that roughly 1 in every 150 adults within the USA has top secret security clearance and if that many people have the top level clearance how many more have one of the many lower levels?

It does seem from this study alone that the USA is awash with spooks and spies and as we know from the past ten years of abuse they are not all engaged in fighting the war on terror and looking for the supposed architect of 9/11 Usama bin-Laden.

Instead the government has directed this huge intelligence apparatus onto the people they are supposed to protect and one can only wonder whether this was the original aim in the first place. No democratic country would have ever accepted such a huge intrusion of privacy, destruction of civil liberties and total disregard to the rule of law had the threat of terrorism not existed and been used as the excuse of the century to implement such draconian measures.

Like many governments throughout the ages from Roman times with Julius Caesar, to Hitler and the Reichstag fire, the terrorist attacks of 9/11 were used by politicians to expand the power of the state at the expense of the citizenry using an outside enemy as the excuse. Whether you believe the attacks of 9/11 were staged or not is not the point as it is clear from succeeding events that they were used by the Bush government, and now the Obama administration to increase the power of the government to intrude into the lives of the public.

The main piece of legislation that started the ball rolling towards a Police State was the Patriot Act. This law was rushed through congress without proper consultation and debate and many senators later admitted that they didn't even read the bill. The very suspiciously timed Anthrax attacks on likely opponents of the bill ensured that the politicians passed through a truly anti-libertarian bill that had been sitting around for years just waiting for the right "event" to occur.

The law expanded the definition of terrorism to include many domestic activities and it enabled the federal government to increase it's surveillance of the public through a systematic warrant-less wire-tapping campaign that trawled through every conceivable piece of electronic information from phone calls, emails, Internet traffic and credit card transactions whilst it built up a huge database of real time events in which it hoped to find signs of terrorist connections in a huge game of connect the dots.

The loosening of the terms that define what is and not terrorism should be a chilling warning to anyone concerned with the war on terror. We have seen here in the UK how the numerous anti terrorism laws have been misused by Police officers to prevent photographers from recording police assaults on the streets and in preventing legitimate protest.

We have also seen our government abuse powers that were supposedly only there for exceptional purposes for non exceptional means such as when the UK froze the bank accounts of Iceland during the banking crisis.

The US government has now gone one step further in it's expansion of the war of terror against it's own citizens by enacting presidential powers that allow for the assassination of US born citizens throughout the world. The US government it seems is now perfectly willing to execute it's own citizens if they believe them to be linked to terrorism. No trial is required to contest any evidence that may or may not exist and the defendant is not allowed to answer any charges to a jury of his peers. If the government deems you to be a terrorist with it's newly relaxed definition of what constitutes terrorism then you may be assassinated.

Not only is the US government cranking up the war on terror by attacking those citizens it decides fall into the category of domestic or foreign terrorist it is also trying to crack down on the only forum in which free speech and dissent of government still exists e.g the internet.

In an age in which the dying print media is being deserted en mass and those that control it are scared of losing a major propaganda tool the attacks on the alternative media have increased tenfold. Claims that the old media is in the pocket of government and not doing it's job properly have increased since the 9/11 attacks and the war in Iraq. This was a war which was miss-sold to the public with the help of national newspapers prepared to look the other way as the government used them to drip feed false stories to a public who knew no better.

The only real voices of opposition are to be found in the blogosphere and the powers that be hate that they cannot control the news in the same way as they could buy off newspaper owners, editors and journalists. Instead of only worrying about a dozen or so national newspapers the government has to contend with millions of blogs and alternative news sites and the only tactic that would work is one that limits ownership of such a site or makes the available content illegal in some way or other. This is why there are now calls to regulate Internet bloggers such as the bill being brought forward by Bruce Patterson.

Obama's Information Czar, Cass Sunstein, has already wrote about his desire to crack down on blogs and sites that dare discuss topics that the government deems as conspiracy theory. This would include discussion of alternative theories surrounding the 9/11 attacks, or concluding that the JFK assassination involved more hit-men than Lee Harvey Oswald on his own. In fact it would cover anything that the government might deem beyond the limits of discussion by those who want to look beyond the official story immediately rolled out whenever a high crime is committed.

Then there are bills being introduced such as Senator Joe Lieberman’s 197-page Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act, which aims to mimic China’s firewall and which would give the President powers to control IT networks and the flow of information in times of emergency such as a cyber attack.

Disabling the internet may be an extreme option to consider but deleting content that is deemed unsuitable is already a daily occurrence. With the merger of leading internet companies such as Google and the CIA it has become very easy for media deemed anti government to be pulled from sites such as YouTube or for search results to be tweaked to hide popular anti government search terms.

We already know how Google and the NSA are working together since the attack on Google by China earlier this year and there have also been claims that the CIA helped fund Google when it was starting up.

With all these links to the intelligence agencies it can safely be assumed that Google's massive database of user traffic, search terms, blogs, emails, videos and much more is seen as a prized asset by the intelligence community and who knows at what level they already co-operate when it comes to sharing data.

Whereas old school Police States were very obvious in their surveillance and monitoring techniques the modern day Amerika has no need to put half a dozen handlers onto someone they wish to monitor (not that they don't have the staff) as through their close links with Google and Microsoft and their new plans to access private information without a warrant they can literally let the information come to them.

We live in a semi virtual world where an online persona is just as important as your real one and due to the amount of social time people spend on social networking sites and the dependence of key infrastructure on the Internet means that control of the network literally can mean control over society.

We already know our governments monitor all our phone calls through the ECHELON system and there is no technical or it seems legal limitation preventing them from analysing every single packet of data transferred over the Internet if they so wished.

Therefore due to a political class that seems to be bought and paid for by those wanting to maintain the war on terror and the surveillance society it has sprung up at home there seems little hope of stopping the high tech police state we are now living in. The solutions are available to those with the means to implement them but in the end it comes down to a choice between a public uprising against the state or a change in the political class running it.

With elections in America due very soon it is a great opportunity to show the ruling elite that the public is not prepared to swap liberty and freedom for fear and the police state that enables it. Judge Napolitano always asks his guests the following question:

"which is more threatening to our way of live, terrorism or an ever increasing secretive and authoritarian state?"

The answer is clearly the latter and we need to elect officials that believe so too.

Only when the phony war on terror is seen for what it is can we start to rollback all the police state apparatus that has build up around us over the last decade. A large section of the population has fallen for the tricks played out by power hungry politicians throughout history and willingly handed over liberty in return for perceived security.

The time has come to realise this was a false trade and that Thomas Jefferson was correct when he said:

“Those who would trade safety for freedom deserve neither.”

Thursday, 20 December 2018

Who Owns The Bank Of England?

Who owns the Bank of England?

By Dark Politricks

I have updated some quotes seeing that people were disputing them and although many original ones were pretty similar to the source the wording was slightly incorrect. As the old site has closed I have copied and pasted the original comments and posted them at the bottom of the posting. Please add new comments as and when you wish in the normal manner.

Also before you criticize a quote please click the link to view the source and then complain at the site that is based around supposedly true quotes please - Sep 2015

First a few historical comments by people who helped create two of the worlds most famous central banks, the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve.

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men". - Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence

The Bank of England was created in 1694 by a Scotsman William Paterson, a quote by one of the governors of the central bank famously said:

"The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing"- Josiah Stamp - Governor of The Bank of England

The history of the Bank of England and how it was taken over by one powerful family hundreds of years ago.

Up until 1946 when it was nationalised the Bank of England was a private run bank that lent money it created out of nothing to the English government and was paid back with interest.

A very famous story relates to the Bank of England and the infamous Rothschilds, that all powerful banking family. This story was re-told recently in a BBC documentary about the creation of money and the Bank of England by none other than the BBC's economics and business editor Robert Peston.

It revolves around the Battle of Waterloo in which Nathan Rothschild used his inside knowledge of the outcome and his faster horses and couriers to play the market by getting the result of the battle before anyone else knew the outcome.

He quickly sold his English bonds and gave all the traders who looked to him for guidance the impression that the French had won at Waterloo.

The other traders all rushed to sell their bonds before the market crashed thinking that they were now worthless and a massive fire-sale occurred as brokers clamored to get rid of their stock.

This massive sell off quickly drove the price of the bonds down to 5% of their original worth.

Once the bottom had dropped out the market Nathan Rothschild then re-bought as many bonds back as he could at hugely discounted prices and in doing so he multiplied his wealth twenty times in 3 days of trading.

At the same time as becoming immensely wealthy he also became the single largest debtor to the English government which ultimately gave him control over the bank of England.

English bonds were a debt guaranteed by future tax revenue of the English government, therefore the taxes the citizens paid were going to pay the 8% interest that the English government had to pay to borrow the money.

As Nathan Rothschild now controlled the majority of the English bonds he could determine the price and therefore the supply of the English currency which gave him great power over the countries finances. As he famously said afterwards.

"Who controls the issuance of money controls the government!" - Nathan Rothschild

Privatisation of the bank continued for years until the bank of England was nationalised after the war in 1946.

However because the government was broke after the second world war they didn't have enough money to buy out all the shareholders so instead they were issued with government stocks.

Although the government now earned money from any bank profits they also had to pay interest on any new stock they issued to pay for the shares they couldn't buy back in the first place.

In 1977, the Bank set up a wholly owned subsidiary called BANK OF ENGLAND NOMINEES LIMITED, a private limited company with 2 of its 100 £1 shares issued. The objectives of the company are:

“To act as Nominee or agent or attorney either solely or jointly with others, for any person or persons, partnership, company, corporation, government, state, organisation, sovereign, province, authority, or public body, or any group or association of them….”

The two shares belong to the bank itself and John Footman who only holds it on behalf of the bank. The directors of this private limited company which is a subsidiary of the bank are John Footman and Andrew Bailey who are both employees of the bank itself.

This company is very special as its protected by the official secrets act, its Royal Charter status and is exempt from the normal disclosure requirements that other companies have to comply with to meet section 27 of the Companies Act 1976.

The reason being is that the major players in the world of finance including the Queen of England and other Royal families use this company to purchase shares and remain anonymous.

However the Bank of England Nominees company accounts are not exempt from any laws regarding companies and they must print their accounts as every company must do which can then be accessed through the Company House website. It is interesting to note however that the latest Bank of England Nominees LTD accounts say that:

"There has been no income or expenditure on the part of the Company since its incorporation and accordingly no profit and loss account is submitted."

It still also has total net assets of £2 (the £2 shares).

However even though the Bank of England is now state owned its important to note that up to 97% of the UK's money supply is privately controlled being in the form of interest bearing loans created by the big commercial banks.

The bank holds very little government stock and the Bank's profits primarily come from the issuing of coins and notes for use by high street banks. Therefore it seems the Bank of England has reduced in size and importance over the years and is now mainly a regulatory body that oversees the existing banking system and since the 1997 Labour government it's main role is to control inflation and the base interest rate used by the country.

Referred to as "the lender of last resort" one of it's other main functions as "the bankers bank" is to support banks that get into difficulty such as during the financial melt down of 2008.

On the surface at least it seems that the Bank of England has returned to state control however in America the Federal Reserve is still a privately controlled bank. This comes as a surprise to many people who don't know the history of the preceding US central banks that went before it but were closed down due to worries that the bankers had too much power.

The history of the US banking system has been one in which control of the money supply has alternated between Congress and privately owned banks.

The founding fathers and early presidents of the USA were very much aware of the dangers concerning central banks and they realised that whoever controlled the nations money supply wielded enormous amounts of power.

The founding fathers of the USA wrote about the dangers of central banking extensively.

"[The] Bank of the United States... is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution... An institution like this, penetrating by its branches every part of the Union, acting by command and in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government. I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation, or its regular functionaries. What an obstruction could not this bank of the United States, with all its branch banks, be in time of war! It might dictate to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw its aids. Ought we then to give further growth to an institution so powerful, so hostile?" -Thomas Jefferson

"We began planning the Revolutionary War in order to issue our own money again" - Benjamin Franklin

"I sincerely believe... that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale". - Thomas Jefferson

"The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, and more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces as public enemies all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe". - Abraham Lincoln

"Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce…when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate". - James Garfield

The following video takes a look at how after a contrived banking crisis the Federal Reserve came to being during the dead of night in 1913.

Hopefully this short history of two of the worlds most famous central banks shows you that Nathan Rothschild was true when he said that whoever controlled a nations money supplied controlled the nation.

Here are comments from the original site I have copied across:

30 Responses

jeebus says

18

17

Rate This

oh, and they’re satanist bilderberger freemasons…
join the dots…
GOD HELP US ALL….
peace

September 5, 2011, 10:29 pmReply
darkpolitricks says

25

3

Rate This

I don’t remember mentioning anything about any of those unfortunate groups of people.

Join the dots however you like but are you disputing any of the quotes or any of the history discussed?

Even the BBC showed a documentary this year on money and how the Rothschilds used their faster horse riders to report a false outcome of the battle of Waterloo to manipulate the market by declaring that the French had won, causing a massive sell off of bonds and then buying them all up cheap as chips.

September 6, 2011, 11:52 pmReply
Sylon heroic says

10

3

Rate This

Hi there,

Nice article one of the best I’ve read on the subject, the entire world now seems to have a centralised banking system,

With the exception if Syria, Libya, Cuba a and north Korea (as far as I’m aware)

Iraq will be going live in 2013 as I direct result of the war (I’m assuming)

In early 2011 the Vatican Called for a “world bank” only this year, Evelyn de Rothschild called for “world currency”

Can you recommend any reading on the worl central bank systems, is there information on how he banks were set up across the world, who wins them etc?

A web us un ravelling before me and I have a terrible feeling in my gut

Best Jerry

April 8, 2012, 12:52 pmReply
Betty Stoggs says

7

0

Rate This

No member of the public should ever, under any circumstances whatsoever, read http://prosperityuk.com/2011/10/investigating-the-bank-of-england-nominees-limited/ or anything similar. Neither should anyone ever refer to any of the “publically available” documents referred to in that document.

December 20, 2012, 4:56 pmReply
Marcus says

7

0

Rate This

Great that we can get a much broader education directly through the internet. Great!

February 16, 2013, 9:50 pmReply
Pussycat says

7

45

Rate This

There are so many errors in this article, and I didn’t even bother reading past a few paragraphs.
Firstly, the Rothschilds didn’t make huge sums on the back of the Battle of Waterloo. When access was granted to their archives, it showed that the Rothschilds had contracted to supply gold to Wellington’s army, and had gambled on a protracted campaign. Since the battle was over quickly, the Rothschilds had to sell their gold at a substantial loss. Some bond dealing on the day mitigated their losses but they basically ended up even.
Secondly, Nathan Rothschild never said the “I care not what puppet” quote. It’s a complete fabrication.

I get sick of being lied to when I’m searching online for information.
If people want to hate Jews then fine, go and hate them, but at least try and be honest.

March 27, 2013, 9:31 amReply
- darkpolitricks says
  
  38
  
  2
  
  Rate This
  
  First – the details of the Battle of Waterloo and the faster rider from the Rothschild family which returned before the English State rider with news of the battle was documentated recently in a BBC documentary about money presented by their top economic expert. The details about the bond trading was mentioned directly in that documentary. Remember anyone can edit WikiPedia!
  
  Secondly – this article has nothing to do with Jews. I don’t think the word Jew or Jewish is mentioned at all in this article so if you have a hang up about Jews then that’s your problem. Personally I don’t give a shit what religion someone is – especially one I or you could change to if we wanted. I think all religions are BS.
  
  Third – Where is your proof that this quote about the “I care not what puppet sits on the throne” is a fabrication?
  
  Fourth – Are you also claiming the other quotes, and the way fiat money works are also fabrications? What about the founding fathers and their many quotes about the dangers of a central bank? Why did they have 2, which were both closed before the FED was created in the dead of night? Are you claiming all the Thomas Jefferson quotes on central banking are fabrications as well?
  
  March 27, 2013, 11:43 pmReply
- KLAUS says
  
  4
  
  2
  
  Rate This
  
  THEN WHO CREATED THE QUOTE, IF NOT NATHAN?
  
  May 1, 2013, 9:37 pmReply
- Ash says
  
  21
  
  4
  
  Rate This
  
  Really can you prove the crap your talking about? The Rothschilds are satanists who want to control the world fuck them and you! i dont give a shit about no fing jews what i do care about is what will happen to us and the future generations! Answer one question who is the USA and the UK governments in debt to? just answer that simple question! Your not dumb your just fucking arrogant trying to defend the jews!! Ask yourself who owns the large super companies? Starbucks? Sainsburys? Law firms? Gap? etc all owned by jews is it just a coincidence? I think not! I am not racist everyone has a right to believe what they want but to bloody enslave people is just bloody evil! There is so much shit going on and everyone is just captured in surviving but just bear in mind today we are just about surviving tomorrow we will not even have that option. We are already debt slaves nothing is ours once they put these chips inside us they own us. Think about it?? Its up to you if you want to believe in God not my business but personally i think He is the only one who can save us now because we have helped the Rothschilds to almost succeed in their plan. They are building concentration camps in America wtf!!! what the hell for?? For the imaginary terrorists wake the fuck up! Its all propaganda , its the divide and conquer rule again think about it. They are pushing us away from God so that we thrive towards materialistic things??? Look at people these days its all about clothes cars phones looking good etc. I am not saying its wrong but that is all we think about no time for God. We send our children to schools nurseries where they put shit in their minds to disrespect parents, trust me im not talking shit look ay the children these days unruly stabbing each other gangs suicide due to bullying, drinking drugs! No respect left in todays generation threatening to call the police etc. I am not saying its wrong for women to work, I am for womens rights, I work myself but when i have children i would want to stay at home with my children and hence wouldnt want to work but will i be in the position to do this??? no!! i fucking cant, you ask why??? its because so much inflation has occurred and so much debt has been created that i cant afford to sit at home. Will i be able to feed and clothe my children probably not. They want mothers to go to work so that 1 – they can tax your wages too, 2 – Keep you away from your children so that you are not able to teach your children what is good and bad and to keep them away from evil, children need love and emotional support no matter how much they deny it, 3 – you will send you children to nurseries / schools at very early ages very easy to now teach your child total shit and whatever they want, children getting influenced easily and their minds are like sponges.
  
  They have control over all the mainstream media so you will only know what they want you to know.
  
  I have so many questions one of them is what is the purpose of the queen? What does she actually do apart from increase her expenses and feed of the public!
  
  Bloody pathetic!
  
  February 21, 2014, 12:17 amReply
  - darkpolitics says
    
    15
    
    0
    
    Rate This
    
    How am I trying to defend the Jews? What planet are you on?
    
    We are all in debt to China for huge amounts and they could all pull the plug on us whenever they wanted. We are also in debt to zombie banks who literally have no real capital but fake their assets and accounts so it looks like they are rich when in reality it’s one big Ponzi scheme.
    
    With China, the problem is they don’t have enough domestic demand for their own products yet to sell t heir goods to them. The Middle Class is growing but they are not spending their spare cash on Chinese goods yet, however once they do have a big Middle Class that can buy Chinese goods there will be no need for the symbitotic relationship with USA./ Europe and they could call in the debt owed by almost every country in the world and bring them to their knees overnight – or cause world war 3.
    
    What is the purpose of the Queen? Fuck knows – I am no Royalist and if you had bothered to read any of my own articles on the state of UK politics and why I hate the Queen (she is literally the law as when you go to court it’s tjhe Crown who is Judging you, therefore if the Queen killed a load of people it would be very unlikely she would use her own courts to send herself to prison) then you would know my thoughts on her and why we should get rid of her. We are basically serfs still.
    
    As for COINTELPRO and Operation Mockingbird I know all about it – read some other articles. The US Goverment has filled US media with agents which is why it has such a low ranking on the Press Freedom Chart this year.
    
    This is just a history of the Bank of England. I know fiat currency is the root of evil, there is not enough REAL cash in the whole world to pay back all the debt there is, which is why more debt needs to be continually created to pay off existing loans.
    
    Why you are attacking me and think I am defending the Jews I have no idea. I just don’t think a religion I could convert to if I really wanted to is the root of all evil.
    
    Zionism is evil – yes. They are Racists, who made deals with the Nazis and let Jews die in World War II as “One cow in Palestine is worth all the Jews in Eastern Europe” as one famous Zionist said. Plus their IDF was created from terrorist gangs such as Irgun and the Stern Gang who killed many British soldiers (King David Hotel) and Palestinians when they forced them from their homes.
    
    They still treat Palestinians and Israeli Arabs as 2nd class citizens and even Eithopean Jews. The wall that divides the country is there to make “facts on the ground” and prevent settlement withdrawla and the attack in International Waters on the Mavi Marmara was jut illegal – I have the video of the execution of the US Citizen as he lay on the floor on my site somewhere (check the menus on the right) – why the US did nothing about a blatant execution of one of their citizens just shows how much they bend over to the Israelis and let them get away (literally) with Murder.
    
    However not all Jews are Zionists and not all Israelis are Jews OR Zionists.
    
    So identify the enemy correctly – Banksters may have a high proportion of people of the Jewish faith in them but then history shows that charging interest on loans was against both Christian and Islamic faiths so only Jews could do it. Therefore many Jews became bankers as that was one of the few jobs they were allowed to do.
    
    The world is in a mess because of fiat currency, the stolen gold and the false accounting of the major banks, But what that has to do with the history of the Bank of England who is the lender of last resort, decides interest rates and prints money I don’t know.
    
    I suggest you read some more of “My Articles” (there is a helpful link in the menu – and a sidebar list of my best ones on the right) before you accusse me of things that are not true.
    
    Thanks for commenting.
    
    February 23, 2014, 10:17 pmReply
- Rami Saba says
  
  0
  
  12
  
  Rate This
  
  you are simply a Jews trying to defend your rubbish attitude and your bloody crimes, i will not argue to what your wrote but simply go revise your ancestors and the history you come from
  
  March 31, 2014, 1:26 pmReply
  - darkpolitics says
    
    12
    
    1
    
    Rate This
    
    Are you having a go at me for being Jewish? You nutter! I think if you actually bothered to read some articles on here about the attack on Gaza, the Mavi Marmara, IDF assassinations, US vetoes on Israel at the UN and Mossad False Flag attacks you would know that I am “anti Zionist”. I am not Jewish, Christian OR Muslim. I think all religions are BS. I am against aggression from any country who is more powerful than the ones they attack and I am against Israel building on Palestinian land illegal settlements and forcing them out of East Jerusalem so they cannot have it as their capital. Read up before attacking someone so you don’t look like a fool please.
    
    March 31, 2014, 2:54 pmReply
Sivuyile says

12

2

Rate This

Gr8 article. Africans lost a gr8 leader in Gaddahfi. He tried to fight the bankstas and he lost.

April 1, 2013, 2:53 pmReply
D Doronron says

3

9

Rate This

I think the author shows his ignorance of the topic when he refers to the Companies Act 1976. Company Law has changed considerably over the years and new Companies Acts were issued in 1981,1985,1989 and totally revamped in 2006. The Bank of England is wholly owned by the government and all the relevant documentation far from being secret or hidden is available to view online to anyone who bothers to look properly.

April 18, 2013, 3:55 pmReply
- darkpolitricks says
  
  6
  
  2
  
  Rate This
  
  I think it’s quite clear if you read the article properly that the author states that the Bank of England was nationalised after World War 2. If you don’t know what nationalised means then it means “owned by the government”.
  The only secrets are the BOE nominees, e.g what they invest in through that mechanism.
  
  April 18, 2013, 9:25 pmReply
  - D Doronron says
    
    4
    
    16
    
    Rate This
    
    Just for the record I’ve worked in accountancy for 38 years so I do know what nationalised means thank you very much. During my 38 years I’ve worked for 3 of the top 20 accountancy firms in the UK and I have seen the accounts for both Bank of England and BOE nominees – both of which are freely available and totally transparent – and I can tell you in no uncertain terms that your wacko conspiracy theory is just that – wacko.
    
    June 3, 2013, 4:24 pmReply
    - darkpolitricks says
      
      18
      
      0
      
      Rate This
      
      Sorry what is whacko about it and where is the conspiracy?
      
      Do I actually mention conspiracy theory in the article – no I don’t think I do! Where are you getting these thoughts from?
      
      Are you telling me that Robert Peston is a “conspiracy theorist” when he presented his BBC documentary on money and how it works?
      
      The same person who told the story during the documentary of the Rothschilds faster messenger from the battle which helped him sell his stocks?
      
      Are you telling me those quotes from the Americans are all fake?
      
      Are you telling me that the FED wasn’t the 3rd US national bank and that the law passing it wasn’t passed in the middle of the night?
      
      Are you telling me that we are not in a huge economic crisis?
      
      Are you telling me that the majority of money that comes into production isn’t from debt issued by banks rather than coinage and notes from the BOE?
      
      Have a look at > http://www.positivemoney.org/
      
      June 6, 2013, 4:40 amReply
    - Gus says
      
      23
      
      3
      
      Rate This
      
      BS, no self respecting accountant from 3/20 top account companies for 38 years would comment on this subject.
      
      Your obviously a troll looking to discredit the subject by use of the terns wacko and conspiracy theory.
      
      June 12, 2013, 1:05 pmReply
    - Gus says
      
      9
      
      2
      
      Rate This
      
      BS, no self respecting accountant from 3/20 top account companies for 38 years would comment on this subject.
      
      Your obviously a troll looking to discredit the subject by use of the terns wacko and conspiracy theory.
      
      June 12, 2013, 1:05 pmReply
      - D Doronron says
        
        2
        
        12
        
        Rate This
        
        No my friend it’s you who’s the troll. Why don’t you check out the facts rather than just issuing insults? I told you that the Companies Act has been issued several time since 1976 have either you or Darkpolitricks checked this out see if I’m right? As for my comments about the accounts for both Bank of England and BOE Nominees being freely available have either of you checked this out? Just to prove the point and make life a little easier for you you might try using the following sites:
        
        http://companycheck.co.uk/
        
        http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/annualreport/2012/2012report.pdf
        
        September 25, 2013, 12:54 pm
John says

13

8

Rate This

Sorry, but if you think anything shown on the BBC is truthful and will allow you to understand what is going on, then you are sadly mistaken. The way to understand what is going on, is to wake up to media fakery. The Rothschild’s own Reuters and AP, who feed the media endless fake stories to condition and scare the masses. They also control the BBC and every other channel. Do you think they would ever let the truth out on one of their stations? The BBC are up to their neck in it over 9/11 and 7/7, which were both hoaxes. Look at the religion of those who own newspapers and TV. They are allowed a small slice of the pie from the masters, the Rothschild’s.

Most posters on here are just shills, trying to ridicule those who understand what is going on. They use the same ill-educated tactic over and over again, but at least it exposes them. Remember, the key to understanding what is going on is media fakery. September Clues proves 100% that 9/11 was a hoax. You should also visit Clues Forum for all the other fakery we are exposed to. Belief or theory doesn’t matter, stick to proof which is provided on said sites. The masses are condition, so won’t accept what is going on. To think that journalists are involved is too hard for most to get their head round, but it is true. How could any journalist say with a straight face that 9/11 was real?

I’m probably wasting my time with this post, but maybe one sheep will wake up, which is a result.

January 11, 2014, 2:06 amReply
- Ethan Harrison says
  
  10
  
  0
  
  Rate This
  
  I thought everyone made some good points – even the ‘accountant’ though it seems patronising to call anyone on here a sheep. Well done darkpolitics for getting it out there some more. I’ll go with the last but one point and move to banking: How ‘can’ any journalist say with a straight face that 9/11 was ‘real’? It is the most utterly ridiculous story ever told.Far, far more impossible to believe than Santa Claus and like Santa Claus you would have to be a child to believe it – and, of course, as everyone knows whose not a child , the Bankers did it.
  There is a video on You Tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8irQifrpmEY in which Norman Dodd, an extremely experienced 82 year old ‘accountant,’ investigating US tax exempt foundations in the 1920′s and 30′s discovered that they the board members of these foundations, Rockefeller, Carnegie etc had worked out long ago that the most profitable event for them was war so, with profit in mind, they should endeavour, with all their considerable energies, to find the most effective way of making sure there always was one and also, through the state education system, how the citizens would learn both to accept and expect them. That’s capitalism for you and the banks own capitalism. In the end its just the bottom line. War makes the most money and also the most debt and so illicits the most control. Therefore…. welcome to the military industrial complex.
  Standard journalism is a complete nonsense, points made earlier about the Associated Press and Reuters are true. Whatever means the Bank of England or its board of members are using to control the monetary system in this country its as obviously fixed as it is across the world by FED subsidiaries: World Bank, IMF, BIS, ECB, WTO, Goldman, Chase, Morgan etc. Countries everywhere are still paying for wars started by the CIA, MI5, Mossad and other ‘government agencies’ long ago it has been going on for hundreds of years. SS Maine, Lusitania, SS Madox, even Hitler funded by Prescott Bush with brother of Paul (father of the FED) Max Warburg running IG Fabern. If the Versailles Treaty and the armistice falling on the 11/11/11 (bankers number for judgement and destruction; 9/11, 7/7 7×11) is a coincidence considering it was also signed at the Rothschild’s house then the odds against must be 16 000 000 000 000: 1 which, by another incredible coincidence, is the current debt the US people owe to the FED.
  Get rid of the bankers or they’ll get rid of you; standard rules of financial competition apply. Its the only way.
  
  Thanks for letting me post darkpolitics I hope it wasn’t too long. I’m following you on Twitter. Though that sounds kinda creepy. Keep up the good work and cheers.
  
  January 21, 2014, 3:53 amReply
  - darkpolitics says
    
    11
    
    0
    
    Rate This
    
    Cheers stalker LOL, sorry if your comment was held up for any time its just purely automated comment spam detection which scans for a number of keywords, links that sort of thing. As I’ve been in hospital recently I haven’t had a chance to check the comments but I approved it asap.
    
    Don’t get me started on 9.11 I think we all know that was a false flag to get the US/UK fighting the Muslims (and driving up our hated of them forcing the much forwarned clash of civilisations) by Israeli agents who have been proved to have been following the hijackers around the US, even living next door to some of them.
    
    I suggest reading the 4 part FOX NEWS (yes even right wing neo-con war mongering FOX had a series on the Israeli connection to the hjackers until it was forced to pull it down by the pro-Israeli lobby) – http://www.darkpolitricks.com/carl-cameron-investigates-israeli-spy-rings-and-their-connection-to-9-11/
    
    Also I suggest reading the denial made by bin-Laden almost immediatley after the attacks.
    
    A bit odd for a terrorist to “deny” such a brilliant planned attack that defeated the massive US air force, NORAD, CIA, NSA, FBI etc, with bolt cutters and US supplied flight training, plus entry to the USA through a known CIA controlled Yemeni consulate used to train the anti Soviet freedom fighters, the Mujahideen who then became “the base” or al-CIAduh assets who Sibel Edmonds has proved were still in close contact and being controlled by US agencies right up to 9.11. Also we only have to look at Syria and Lybia to see how we support them in certain wars whilst claiming them to be our mortal enemy in others.
    
    Read Robin Cook admits CIA created al-Qaeda here > http://www.darkpolitricks.com/robin-cook-admits-cia-created-al-qaeda/
    
    Why is it most terrorist groups ADMIT responsibiity for their attacks. It’s because otherwise what is the point of doing them if not to bring attention to their cause?
    
    The IRA admitted to every bombing they did so did ETA and every other terrorist group yet when 9.11 happened even bin-Laden denied he had anything to do with it. Why not claim he had even if he hadn’t – e.g take fake credit? Even the FBI admitted there was not enough evidence to link him to the attacks. The fact his name was being yelled as the attacker by US media within minutes shows us we were being led down a certain path……
    
    Read his denial here > http://www.darkpolitricks.com/an-interview-with-usama-bin-laden-from-28th-september-2001/
    
    Very odd to deny the most successful terror attack in world history no?
    
    As for the no planes theory I have no time for that.
    
    Yes media outlets are owned by a small select few groups of interlinked and powerful people.
    Yes war is a racket.
    Yes the CIA is the army Capitalism uses to further US corportations influence and they have a black budget funded by drug running so they don’t have to ask Congress for money. If you have time read this 4 part series on the history of CIA drug running > http://www.darkpolitricks.com/cia-involvement-in-drug-smuggling-part-1/
    
    All the way from the 2nd World War to the Golden Triangle, Air America, to Columbian Coke deals, Interviews with the biggest Burmese Heroin dealer who said the CIA were his biggest customer, Barry Seal, Bush, Mena and more…..BUT,
    
    To claim that every one of the thousands of people who saw the planes overhead them hit the towers are lying or paid shills is foolish.
    
    Nearly all the camera shots and footage of planes slicing through buildings or entering out the other side have been explained by people who can analyse film and prove how a sharp zoom over miles would ensure one shot one second shows no plane, yet after a fast zoom a plane appears.
    
    Who were in the planes, what was controlling them and why WT7 came down you can debate but that no plane actually any of the towers, nope, not having it.
    
    You can read my article on the subject here as first when I watched the September Clues documentary I admit I was intrigued with some of the questions however the main ones are easily debunked I’m afraid and more likely put there to discredit the whole 911Truth movement as loons who believe thousands of people can be hypnotised and thousands od TV workers, Camera men, helicopter pilots, people with footage that has only recently come to light and everyone else are just “actors” or “paid shills” > http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2010/08/september-clues-and-the-no-planes-conspiracy-theory/
    
    I have no doubt the US media is full of COINTELPRO and Operation Mockingbird agents and the war in Iraq proved it by the number of paid for US military “analysts” who were giving out biased information day by day during that unneccessary war.
    
    If the hijackers were all Saudi then why did we attack Afghanistan and Iraq and not the Bush/Bandar Saudi’s who were allowed to fly out of the country ASAP.
    
    My thoughts on the 9.11 attack are here by the way > http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2011/06/9-11-sceptics-versus-logic-reason-and-scientific-principles/
    
    And my other article on the “Pentagon Attack – Finally Solved” – Ex Reagan official and witness statements from those people who saw planes prove the hole in the wall with a clean lawn in front is NOT where the plane hit but a secondary explosion. Which explains why people walked through it and saw no plane debris.
    It also explains why some people saw planes and others didn’t as well as showing how witnesses who came out were threatened to keep quiet by the government
    
    I know the videos are long but if you don’t have time I suggest watching the one which shows exactly what happens when a plane made of light weight metals hits a wall at 400mph – it explodes into nothing and the wall remains standing.
    
    Also the talk by ex Reagan official Barbara Honegger. In this talk she expertly puts the pieces together to describe how witnesses could both see a plane hit the Pentagon and how a hole could be punched through 3 rings of re-enforced concreted. Which obviously a plane couldn’t do at 400mph inches from the ground going into the first floor windows – an impossible feat as any plane engineer or pilot knows due to the downforce and control needed to fly that low without hitting the ground.
    
    http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2013/07/the-pentagon-attack-9-11/
    
    Anyway thanks for commenting – and yes the banksters need stringing up. Money is being created by banks loaning out money and then crediting accounts with nothing but electronic digits. They then loan this “newly” depostied money out ten times over.
    
    We don’t have enough “real” money in the world to pay off ALL the debts AND interest which is why more loans are constantly required to be made. When the people stop spending money they haven’t got the Government takes over. We need bankers being jailed like they were in Iceland.
    
    Thanks for commenting and I hope you get time to read some of those other links.
    
    January 21, 2014, 10:18 pmReply
Steven says

0

6

Rate This

Queen of England? I would not even to hazard a guess at the writer being in the Useless of A. England is a constituent country within a group of countries known as the United Kingdom.

January 29, 2014, 11:44 pmReply
- darkpolitics says
  
  5
  
  0
  
  Rate This
  
  Nope, actually if you had checked a bit more you would easily know I am from England. I suppose being English I see her as the Queen of England even though she is also the Queen of the UK / Britain, and other territories as well as the Head of State for numerous other countries of the commonwealth. I’m afraid its due to the way I was brought up, being English, therefore I call her the Queen of MY country which she is, the Queen of England as well as Scotland, Wales, Northern Island, The Falklands, Gibraltar, etc etc.
  
  January 30, 2014, 11:17 pmReply