Free Speech Will Die With Julian Assange

Free Speech is Dead but will we allow ourselves to witness the USA murder Julian Assange?

By Dark Politricks

It has been obvious for years now that true free speech is dead in the Western supposedly "free world". However the case of Julian Assange is one that all the mainstream papers who published his work, and profited from it whilst Wikileaks itself did not, seem to have forgotten the importance of his case for all journalists, legacy and alternative. 

Julian Assange before he was tortured by the UK

Julian has been slowly tortured through years of solitary confinement in Belmarsh prison and before that within the Ecuadorian embassy, where the CIA and MI6 plotted to kill him lest anyone forget. 

If he is sent to the USA who want to lock him up for over 175 years, he will surely die. If he is locked up in a supermax prison he will probably be Epstein'd off, shanked in the showers by a CIA paid prisoner with nothing to lose, commit suicide, or even be executed. 

His trial under the ancient Espionage Act means he has no right to claim the public had a right to see the war crimes committed by the USA they claim he and Chelsea Manning hacked US computers to obtain. He is being charged using a fraudulent FBI case that relied on a compromised witness who lied in his testimony about Assange doing any sort of actual hacking which the US still claims he did. Quote:

A major witness in the United States’ Department of Justice case against Julian Assange has admitted to fabricating key accusations in the indictment against the Wikileaks founder. The witness, who has a documented history with sociopathy and has received several convictions for sexual abuse of minors and wide-ranging financial fraud, made the admission in a newly published interview in Stundin where he also confessed to having continued his crime spree whilst working with the Department of Justice and FBI and receiving a promise of immunity from prosecution.

You can read my full article here about the fraudulent witness the FBI relied on to make their case about Assange actually hacking US computers to get the information with Chelsea Manning.

To see all my previous articles I have created here, or imported since I got removed from my older bigger site, you can use my new search bar to search for "Julian Assange". 

If you want to see all the articles I had on my old site you will need to use the Wayback Machine, It is quite a trip down memory lane to see all the articles I had back then, for if any long time reader remembers, it was Wikileaks release of the snuff video of the US helicopter murder of Reuters reporters on the ground in Iraq that started the rage in me that got me first writing Dark Politricks. 

However that article is not available here or even on the Wayback machine it seems, not that I can find anyway, it seems the authorities have even tried cleaning my old site on the never go away Internet site itself. An unusually large no of articles related to Assange and Manning are 404 Not Found - or claimed to have never been indexed at all. Very suspicious. 

However you can see watch that infamous video with commentary from Assange below.

Remember if you ever find videos on here, maybe from RT.com, or others just blocked with a "This video is not available in your country", to use a VPN to get around the block. It is good to see the Brave browser search bar is not blocking Russia Today anymore, whilst other search engines still hide the site. I have found using Belarus the best country to get RT content which was banned at the start of the Russian Special Military Operation in Ukraine. If you cannot afford to pay for a VPN, Bitdefender allows you up to 200MB of free traffic over their servers per day. Another choice is Proton VPN, which offers some free server locations around the world.

If you have forgotten Julian gave an impassioned speech when he was still allowed to seek asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy that you can read in full here. 

"The United States must pledge before the world that it will not pursue journalists for shining a light on the secret crimes of the powerful."

"There must be no more foolish talk about prosecuting any media organization, be it WikiLeaks or be it the New York Times."

The New York Times, once a bastion of free speech who often printed Wikileaks material as well as information from the Snowden files, is now nothing more than an establishment paper pushing CIA intelligence. Is not making any comments about the possibility of Julian Assange being extradited to the USA from the UK despite publishing the same material Wikileaks published.

It does not matter if you are a paid journalist working for one of these big papers or a blogger like me exposing more information that the mainstream media won't go near, such as pro Palestinian news, and the news you don't hear from the Russian Ukrainian war. 

If we let the murder of Julian Assange go ahead it will shake fear into many journalists bellies making them self censor what they write, scared of the same possible treatment.

We cannot let the murder of Julian Assange by the combined intelligence services of the UK and USA go ahead. 

Free speech may have died in the UK long ago, and in the USA no-one is sticking up for their constitutional rights, letting the Government expand the massive US Security state, step by step, making the Constitution irrelevant. If you don't protect it, the Government and the permanent security state will take it away, and that's what is happening in America right now. 

If you are American and believe in your Constitution then you should be protesting the extradition of Julian Assange as well all these new extensions to the FISA court and expansion of NSA surveillance on US citizens. 

The death of Julian Assange will just be the final nail in the coffin.

I hope the UK judges have not had closed ears since the last appeal where the FBI's lies about Julian Assange were used to let his case proceed forward. One of the judges is an existing attorney that helps the UK security services and really should have been recused, but she has stayed sitting.

It is not a good sign when the Judges deciding your fate probably hate you and your website for allowing intelligence to be aired, that whilst in the public interest, was not in the interest of the Security State they themselves work for.

Lets pray for a Tory Home Secretary to have the balls Teressa May did when preventing the extradition of Gary McKinnon to the USA over his UFO hacking due to health issues.

By Dark Politricks

© 2024 Dark Politricks

Terrorism is not an excuse for the loss of our liberties

Terrorism is not an excuse for the loss of our liberties

By Dark Politricks

The war on terror has been used by the UK government as a battering ram to the rights of the citizens of this country. New laws have been passed including 2 new terrorism acts (2000 and 2006) which have restricted free speech, the rights of demonstrators to protest and have given the police new powers of stop and search and lets not forget the 28 days detention and control orders.

Now you may say "well you have nothing to fear unless you have something to hide" which is a bend over attitude that leads to fascism. I am not a terrorist but nor are most people who have been affected by this new age of fighting terrorism.

Its the thin edge of the wedge which has taken advantage of peoples justifiable fears about terrorist attacks to introduce laws that if only applied to real terrorists would be fine however who can forget the 82 year old Walter Wolfgang who was dragged out of the Labour conference for heckling Jack Straw under the terrorism act in 2005. Or what about Gordon Brown invoking the terrorism act to freeze Iceland's bank accounts during 2008?

Just these two acts alone prove how our government intends to use these new powers for reasons other than fighting terrorism.

Once the public has been forced into a mindset that demands protection from unseen shadowy terrorists and that they must be dealt with severely it then allows the government to widen the scope of what actually constitutes terrorism.

One day you are a protester exercising your legal right of protest the next you are a terrorist trying to overthrow the state with subversive acts. Take a look over the pond to see how the US government is trying to class gun owners, ex servicemen and Ron Paul supporters as domestic terrorists.

It seems that the US constitution is slowly being eroded bit by bit. I never used to understand the Americans fascination with their right to bear guns however the more I have read up about Thomas Jefferson and the other founding fathers and their desire to protect the people against the tyranny of government it makes perfect sense. I especially love the following two quotes that Jefferson made:

"No man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

"And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not .warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.... The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

I have come to have a renewed respect for the founding fathers of America and the contemporary patriots who want the US government to return to the constitution. The world would be a quieter and probably safer place if it did.

Even though Jefferson and Washington kicked their British rulers out during the war of Independence us Brits must never forget that the father of the revolution was Thomas Paine an Englishman whose books the Age of Reasonand the Rights of Man had enormous influence on the Age of Enlightenment and the revolutions of France and America.

Two new republics were born that decreed that man had inalienable rights that could not be taken away by government. Therefore when people see their government treating their constitution as "just a piece of paper"as George Bush famously called it and trampling over their rights including the right to bear arms as if their inalienable rights were just an outdated idea that had no place in this century then I can see why they get so upset over the 2nd amendment.

Here in the UK its too late as we are currently a disarmed nation since the massacres of Dunblane and Hungerford took our guns away but then unlike the Americans we never had an inalienable right to bare arms anyway.

In fact although the UK passed the first ever bill of rights in 1689 it was never thought necessary for us to have a written constitution like the French and Americans.

I personally think it would be in our own best interests to draw up our own document as soon as possible. Yes we have the Human Rights act of 1998 which the right wing media decries and complains about almost every other day as something that has been imposed on us from Europe. However ridiculous the examples the Daily Mail and Express use to denigrate this act seem we should never feel that getting rid of that act would be in our best interest.

Civil rights have been hard fought and won through years of battle between state and its populace and any document that tries to enshrine our rights for future prosperity should be cherished and held in high esteem. We should also remember that it was British lawyers that drew up the Europen Convention on human rights in 1950, that the act is based on, after the horrors of the second world war. So we should view this act as yet another example of us Brits bringing civil rights to the world rather than Europe imposing some alien concept on us.

From the Magna Carta in 1215, through to John Lockes and Thomas Hobbes social contract between man and the state through to the first Bill of Rights and then the Human Rights act we Brits have been at the forefront of civil rights and we should not let the fear of terrorism allow any of these hard won rights to be taken away as once gone they will probably not come back unless a Liberal Democrat government gets in power which seems most unlikely.

We are slowly walking down the path to a place that I don't want to call home. When George Orwells 1984 starts to become a commentary on modern times then we must all stop and ask ourselves what the hell is going on.

By Dark Politricks