Free Speech Will Die With Julian Assange

Free Speech is Dead but will we allow ourselves to witness the USA murder Julian Assange?

By Dark Politricks

It has been obvious for years now that true free speech is dead in the Western supposedly "free world". However the case of Julian Assange is one that all the mainstream papers who published his work, and profited from it whilst Wikileaks itself did not, seem to have forgotten the importance of his case for all journalists, legacy and alternative. 

Julian Assange before he was tortured by the UK

Julian has been slowly tortured through years of solitary confinement in Belmarsh prison and before that within the Ecuadorian embassy, where the CIA and MI6 plotted to kill him lest anyone forget. 

If he is sent to the USA who want to lock him up for over 175 years, he will surely die. If he is locked up in a supermax prison he will probably be Epstein'd off, shanked in the showers by a CIA paid prisoner with nothing to lose, commit suicide, or even be executed. 

His trial under the ancient Espionage Act means he has no right to claim the public had a right to see the war crimes committed by the USA they claim he and Chelsea Manning hacked US computers to obtain. He is being charged using a fraudulent FBI case that relied on a compromised witness who lied in his testimony about Assange doing any sort of actual hacking which the US still claims he did. Quote:

A major witness in the United States’ Department of Justice case against Julian Assange has admitted to fabricating key accusations in the indictment against the Wikileaks founder. The witness, who has a documented history with sociopathy and has received several convictions for sexual abuse of minors and wide-ranging financial fraud, made the admission in a newly published interview in Stundin where he also confessed to having continued his crime spree whilst working with the Department of Justice and FBI and receiving a promise of immunity from prosecution.

You can read my full article here about the fraudulent witness the FBI relied on to make their case about Assange actually hacking US computers to get the information with Chelsea Manning.

To see all my previous articles I have created here, or imported since I got removed from my older bigger site, you can use my new search bar to search for "Julian Assange". 

If you want to see all the articles I had on my old site you will need to use the Wayback Machine, It is quite a trip down memory lane to see all the articles I had back then, for if any long time reader remembers, it was Wikileaks release of the snuff video of the US helicopter murder of Reuters reporters on the ground in Iraq that started the rage in me that got me first writing Dark Politricks. 

However that article is not available here or even on the Wayback machine it seems, not that I can find anyway, it seems the authorities have even tried cleaning my old site on the never go away Internet site itself. An unusually large no of articles related to Assange and Manning are 404 Not Found - or claimed to have never been indexed at all. Very suspicious. 

However you can see watch that infamous video with commentary from Assange below.

Remember if you ever find videos on here, maybe from RT.com, or others just blocked with a "This video is not available in your country", to use a VPN to get around the block. It is good to see the Brave browser search bar is not blocking Russia Today anymore, whilst other search engines still hide the site. I have found using Belarus the best country to get RT content which was banned at the start of the Russian Special Military Operation in Ukraine. If you cannot afford to pay for a VPN, Bitdefender allows you up to 200MB of free traffic over their servers per day. Another choice is Proton VPN, which offers some free server locations around the world.

If you have forgotten Julian gave an impassioned speech when he was still allowed to seek asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy that you can read in full here. 

"The United States must pledge before the world that it will not pursue journalists for shining a light on the secret crimes of the powerful."

"There must be no more foolish talk about prosecuting any media organization, be it WikiLeaks or be it the New York Times."

The New York Times, once a bastion of free speech who often printed Wikileaks material as well as information from the Snowden files, is now nothing more than an establishment paper pushing CIA intelligence. Is not making any comments about the possibility of Julian Assange being extradited to the USA from the UK despite publishing the same material Wikileaks published.

It does not matter if you are a paid journalist working for one of these big papers or a blogger like me exposing more information that the mainstream media won't go near, such as pro Palestinian news, and the news you don't hear from the Russian Ukrainian war. 

If we let the murder of Julian Assange go ahead it will shake fear into many journalists bellies making them self censor what they write, scared of the same possible treatment.

We cannot let the murder of Julian Assange by the combined intelligence services of the UK and USA go ahead. 

Free speech may have died in the UK long ago, and in the USA no-one is sticking up for their constitutional rights, letting the Government expand the massive US Security state, step by step, making the Constitution irrelevant. If you don't protect it, the Government and the permanent security state will take it away, and that's what is happening in America right now. 

If you are American and believe in your Constitution then you should be protesting the extradition of Julian Assange as well all these new extensions to the FISA court and expansion of NSA surveillance on US citizens. 

The death of Julian Assange will just be the final nail in the coffin.

I hope the UK judges have not had closed ears since the last appeal where the FBI's lies about Julian Assange were used to let his case proceed forward. One of the judges is an existing attorney that helps the UK security services and really should have been recused, but she has stayed sitting.

It is not a good sign when the Judges deciding your fate probably hate you and your website for allowing intelligence to be aired, that whilst in the public interest, was not in the interest of the Security State they themselves work for.

Lets pray for a Tory Home Secretary to have the balls Teressa May did when preventing the extradition of Gary McKinnon to the USA over his UFO hacking due to health issues.

By Dark Politricks

© 2024 Dark Politricks

An interview with Gary McKinnon about UFO's, Free Energy and UK Law

An interview with Gary McKinnon about UFO's, Free Energy and UK Law

By Dark Politricks

An old but interesting interview with Gary McKinnon the famous UK hacker who claims to have found evidence of aliens inside NASA computer systems. I bring this up because Julian Assange is fighting not to be sent to the US for a charge of "HACKING", when in fact he did no such thing and the US's informant recanted all his evidence in an interview with an Icelandic newspaper. 

Gary McKinnon was also charged with hacking in the early 2000's and the US had waited until the new one sided extradition treaty with the UK had become law before charging him. However after public outcry and the knowledge that he had "Asperger's Syndrome", noticed by someone watching an interview with Gary on TV, led to a massive public backlash and even the Tory Home Secretary at the time decided to overrule any court decision saying, he would NOT survive in a US prison, a bit like how the judge in the Assange case said that he wouldn't survive in a US prison. If they cannot even keep high profile suspects like Jeffery Epstein alive under mysterious circumstances then what hope do people like Assange and McKinnon stand?

I hope the lawyers behind Assange bring this up in the US appeal, as at the time the US were labelling Gary as the most "dangerous hacker in the world". When in fact as you will see he did rather little hacking, and was just using the blank admin passwords on unsecure Navy computers to access them. So if we are not going to extradite the worlds most "dangerous" hacker, why should we be contemplating extraditing a non hacker, a journalist, which can be proven by the recanted evidence of the now locked up Sigurdur Ingi Thordarson.

The reason the US may have wanted Gary McKinnon so badly, despite him saving them millions in security audits by showing which servers needed real security if a port probing, blank admin accessing, total non hacker, as Gary freely admits he was, could get into their systems. Was that he found out about the secret space program, and lists off world fleet personnel, none that worked on Naval Ships in the US Navy. I think it had more to do with the fact he was telling the world he had found evidence of the US photo shopping out images of alien craft on the moon before making them public to libraries and universities than any "hacking" he may have done.

This is an older interview and not the original one I had due to it being taken down from YouTube - I wonder why? However it is good enough and comes from BitChute.com.

Within the interview he discusses:

• Why the American government want him so much and how the UK government capitulated without a fight.
• How he was a clueless hacker who didn't cover his tracks whilst investigating US computer systems.
• How he gained access to high grade military and NASA computer system by basic port scanning unsecured US Navy computers, and logging in easily due to the administrator accounts having blank passwords. This isn't really hacking it's as it's pretty easy to run a port scan, I've even made by own port scanners apps in C# such as the one below, and PHP for the web, that let me access a computer and tell me which ports are open. You can even get apps for your phone that do this now, or use one of the many free online port scanners that let you know which ones are open. Therefore it's pretty easy to find out how you can try accessing any computer in question by a certain port. No hacking is actually required, especially if the US were so silly as to have blank admin passwords which gave anyone access to the servers at administrator level. For example here is my own Port Scanner Windows App that I wrote one bored day, which shows me ports that are open on a server, a reverse DNS lookup to find the HOST, the country it is in by a simple geo-IP lookup, a ping test as if you were doing one in a command prompt and an HTTP "Ping" test to see if I can access the IP address or related server on the Internet and the type of Web Server they are using.           

As you can see the information about the server behind the IP address gives me quite a lot of information about the server type, the location of the machine and list of open or closed ports I could then use to try and enter that machine with other tools. Therefore the hack Gary did was very simple and many real hackers would not even consider this REAL Hacking at all.

• How the US government claims that he caused $5,000 of damage to every computer port he accessed which coincidentally is the minimum amount required by US law to be charged with the crimes he has been charged with. In fact he has saved the US military millions in security analysis by showing them which servers are vulnerable to attack, and if he managed to port scan and access admin accounts you can be sure Russia, China and Israel already have done so.
• Why he believes that the US government has access to alien technology such as free energy which should be distributed to the people of the world.
• How NASA has a special agency that's purpose is to remove evidence of UFO's from photos that are then distributed to the public e.g universities and science labs with only the new airbrushed version.
• How he read the testimony of one of these photographers and proved she was telling the truth by accessing the system in question and seeing first hand one of these images in a before and after shot where before it contained some sort of alien looking craft and afterwards it didn't.
• How he found a list of names of off world Ship personnel that were not Naval and therefore could be linked to the Secret Space Program. Watch some Richard Dolan videos to find out more about that juicy story.
• What he feels his chances are of spending 70 years in an American prison and how he is challenging the unfair extradition law between the UK and US which means a UK citizen can be sent off to the USA without evidence of a crime having been committed.

I did have an original interview with Gary in a pub garden where he spoke frankly about all the above issues but YouTube in their infinite wisdom has removed it so I have found the next best thing, an interview by Richard D Hall with Gary McKinnon from 2015.

By Dark Politricks

© 2018 By Dark Politricks

Key witness in Julian Assange case was lying as an FBI informant to get off charges of sexual crime against kids

How the US handles legal issues, it lies, and tortures it's targets, and uses fraudulent witnesses to boost their case.

By Dark Politricks

Get the full article here on stundin.is

A major witness in the United States’ Department of Justice case against Julian Assange has admitted to fabricating key accusations in the indictment against the Wikileaks founder. The witness, who has a documented history with sociopathy and has received several convictions for sexual abuse of minors and wide-ranging financial fraud, made the admission in a newly published interview in Stundin where he also confessed to having continued his crime spree whilst working with the Department of Justiceand FBI and receiving a promise of immunity from prosecution.

The man in question, Sigurdur Ingi Thordarson, was recruited by US authorities to build a case against Assange after misleading them to believe he was previously a close associate of his. In fact he had volunteered on a limited basis to raise money for Wikileaks in 2010 but was found to have used that opportunity to embezzle more than $50,000 from the organization. Julian Assange was visiting Thordarson’s home country of Iceland around this time due to his work with Icelandic media and members of parliament in preparing the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, a press freedom project that produced a parliamentary resolution supporting whistleblowers and investigative journalism. 

The United States is currently seeking Assange’s extradition from the United Kingdom in order to try him for espionage relating to the release of leaked classified documents. If convicted, he could face up to 175 years in prison. The indictment has sparked fears for press freedoms in the United States and beyond and prompted strong statements in support of Assange from Amnesty International, Reporters without borders, the editorial staff of the Washington Post and many others. 

US officials presented an updated version of an indictment against him to a Magistrate court in London last summer. The veracity of the information contained therein is now directly contradicted by the main witness, whose testimony it is based on.

No instruction from Assange

The court documents refer to Mr Thordarson simply as “Teenager” (a reference to his youthful appearance rather than true age, he is 28 years old) and Iceland as “NATO Country 1” but make no real effort to hide the identity of either. They purport to show that Assange instructed Thordarson to commit computer intrusions or hacking in Iceland. 

The aim of this addition to the indictment was apparently to shore up and support the conspiracy charge against Assange in relation to his interactions with Chelsea Manning. Those occurred around the same time he resided in Iceland and the authors of the indictment felt they could strengthen their case by alleging he was involved in illegal activity there as well. This activity was said to include attempts to hack into the computers of members of parliament and record their conversations.

In fact, Thordarson now admits to Stundin that Assange never asked him to hack or access phone recordings of MPs. His new claim is that he had in fact received some files from a third party who claimed to have recorded MPs and had offered to share them with Assange without having any idea what they actually contained. He claims he never checked the contents of the files or even if they contained audio recordings as his third party source suggested. He further admits the claim, that Assange had instructed or asked him to access computers in order to find any such recordings, is false.

Nonetheless, the tactics employed by US officials appear to have been successful as can be gleaned from the ruling of Magistrate Court Judge Vanessa Baraitser on January 4th of this year. Although she ruled against extradition, she did so purely on humanitarian grounds relating to Assange’s health concerns, suicide risk and the conditions he would face in confinement in US prisons. With regards to the actual accusations made in the indictment Baraitser sided with the arguments of the American legal team, including citing the specific samples from Iceland which are now seriously called into question.

Other misleading elements can be found in the indictment, and later reflected in the Magistrate’s judgement, based on Thordarson’s now admitted lies. One is a reference to Icelandic bank documents. The Magistrate court judgement reads: “It is alleged that Mr. Assange and Teenager failed a joint attempt to decrypt a file stolen from a “NATO country 1” bank”.

Thordarson admits to Stundin that this actually refers to a well publicised event in which an encrypted file was leaked from an Icelandic bank and assumed to contain information about defaulted loans provided by the Icelandic Landsbanki. The bank went under in the fall of 2008, along with almost all other financial institutions in Iceland, and plunged the country into a severe economic crisis. The file was at this time, in summer of 2010, shared by many online who attempted to decrypt it for the public interest purpose of revealing what precipitated the financial crisis. Nothing supports the claim that this file was even “stolen” per se, as it was assumed to have been distributed by whistle-blowers from inside the failed bank.

More deceptive language emerges in the aforementioned judgment where it states: “...he [Assange] used the unauthorized access given to him by a source, to access a government website of NATO country-1 used to track police vehicles.”

This depiction leaves out an important element, one that Thordarson clarifies in his interview with Stundin. The login information was in fact his own and not obtained through any nefarious means. In fact, he now admits he had been given this access as a matter of routine due to his work as a first responder while volunteering for a search and rescue team. He also says Assange never asked for any such access.

Revealing chat logs

Thordarson spoke with a journalist from Stundin for several hours as he prepared a thorough investigative report into his activities that include never before published chat logs and new documents.

The chat logs were gathered by Thordarson himself and give a comprehensive picture of his communications whilst he was volunteering for Wikileaks in 2010 and 11. It entails his talks with WikiLeaks staff as well as unauthorized communications with members of international hacking groups that he got into contact with via his role as a moderator on an open IRC WikiLeaks forum, which is a form of live online chat. There is no indication WikiLeaks staff had any knowledge of Thordarson’s contacts with aforementioned hacking groups, indeed the logs show his clear deception. 

The communications there show a pattern where Thordarson is constantly inflating his position within WikiLeaks, describing himself as chief of staff, head of communications, No 2 in the organization or responsible for recruits. In these communications Thordarson frequently asks the hackers to either access material from Icelandic entities or attack Icelandic websites with so-called DDoS attacks. These are designed to disable sites and make them inaccessible but not cause permanent damage to content.

Stundin cannot find any evidence that Thordarson was ever instructed to make those requests by anyone inside WikiLeaks. Thordarson himself is not even claiming that, although he explains this as something Assange was aware of or that he had interpreted it so that this was expected of him. How this supposed non-verbal communication took place he cannot explain.

Furthermore, he never explained why WikiLeaks would be interested in attacking any interests in Iceland, especially at such a sensitive time while they were in the midst of publishing a huge trove of US diplomatic cables as part of an international media partnership. Assange is not known to have had any grievances with Icelandic authorities and was in fact working with members of parliament in updating Iceland’s freedom of press laws for the 21st century. 

On the FBI radar

Thordarson's rogue acts were not limited to communications of that nature as he also admits to Stundin that he set up avenues of communication with journalists and had media pay for lavish trips abroad where he misrepresented himself as an official representative of WikiLeaks.

He also admits that he stole documents from WikiLeaks staff by copying their hard drives. Among those were documents from Renata Avila, a lawyer who worked for the organization and Mr. Assange.

Thordarson continued to step up his illicit activities in the summer of 2011 when he established communication with “Sabu”, the online moniker of Hector Xavier Monsegur, a hacker and a member of the rather infamous LulzSec hacker group. 

In that effort all indications are that Thordarson was acting alone without any authorization, let alone urging, from anyone inside WikiLeaks.

Read the rest of the article at stundin.is.

By Dark Politricks

© 2021 Dark Politricks