They had a relationship that allowed them to implant their own chips into the PC's.
It is widely suggested that the chip allowed the NSA to bypass any security measures that the user of the machine may have installed.
From the article:
The approval mechanism was introduced to ensure that the weak encryption in non-US versions of Windows could not be replaced with stronger software without it being checked against a "key" embedded in Windows, proving that it had been digitally signed off by Microsoft.
Ukrainian Exploits and Attacks in Russia could lead to Nuclear War
By Dark Politricks
At the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it seemed that some sense prevailed among Western leaders not to engage fully in the war encase that it led to a full-blown NATO v Russian World War 3 scenario.
However as the war progressed, and as"battlefield" experts kept claiming that Russia was on the defence. That their masterplan to storm and take Kyiv with a force at least an eighth of the size needed for the job of taking and controlling a city of millions had been halted, the rhetoric increased wildly, and "preventing World War 3", became "Making Money From Flooding Ukraine With Weapons".
There was of course Ukrainian propaganda showing disillusioned Russian POWS ringing their Mums whilst being filmed (a breach of the Geneva war treaty), and saying they didn't even know they were in Ukraine or had been misled and misfed, however, what would you say to your enemy when captured and not wanting to die on film?
It is no lie that some scared Russian generals had lied to Putin saying that they would be welcomed in every town they passed on the way to Kyiv, and they were quick to be dispatched and replaced by men who could get the job done seeing that the Zelenskyy government did not just fall at the sight of a 40 mile line of tanks outside its capital.
However, this massive force did do its part in "shaping the battlefield" by keeping a large proportion of the Ukrainian army in the west to defend the capital whilst their main objectives in the East were carried out. So sorry to say to the armchair generals, many on the boards of MIC companies who are making money from prolonging this war, that this was in no way a sign that the Ukrainians were "winning".
To remind those people who think the aim of the invasion was just to invade Kyiv, the initial declared objectives were:
Defend and take back the breakaway Russian-speaking parts of the Donbass, Donetsk and Lugansk who had signed a military cooperation treaties with Russiaas it was clear Ukrainian forces were encircling their areas, as well as on the way to take back Crimea who had already broken away from Ukraine years ago.
De-Nazify the Ukrainian military who had encompassed the AZOV Militia into the main army as a brigade and who were the main instigators of the many atrocities and massacres that had occurred during the last 8 years of fighting in the Donbass region.
De-militarise Ukraine so that its NATO trained army was no longer a force to be reckoned with.
Ensure Ukraine did NOT join NATO as was being touted by the Western "Defensive" Organisation.
As I have detailed in past articles, the lies that Russia was told about NATO not moving an inch toward Russia's borders since the fall of the Berlin Wall, and their desire to fight Russia in some way have long been known. Russia is vilified by the US Press at every election for supposed interfering as if the US never interferes in other country's elections, all despite proof coming out that this was just an excuse Hillary Clinton made up due to her loss to an orange-faced game show host.
However, despite Russia being the target of lies to cover Hillary Clinton's Presidential loss, the massive Russophobia that the US clearly had after these lies was not the cause of this current anti-Russian sentiment. The Afghan war was over, the MIC was looking for a new enemy to make money from, and Russia has always been a historical target of the US & UK, and now they have dragged the EU, which up until recently had good relationships with Russia, especially Germany, into their sanction misfire.
So whilst the plan of the sanctions was to crush the Russian economy and hopefully cause an uprising and overthrow of Putin's regime, it has in fact strengthened him and the rouble as the Russian people clearly see that their politician's rhetoric about the West hating Russia, is in fact, very true. This has given Putin carte blanche to go full ahead in his war with Ukraine as the Russian people now realise how Russophobic the west really is.
So as Russia forces EU countries to pay for their gas in roubles not dollars or Euro's, and whilst the EU and US are staggering into a recession, Russia is booming, with a massive surplus of roubles, and has started what looks like the destruction of the Petrodollars reign as currency supreme as they join the two most populous countries in the world, China and India in economic treaties, selling gas to allies on the cheap and cutting it off to European countries who refuse to inflate the value of the rouble by paying for the gas they want in their own currency.
This is a right-wing element who brags on Telegram, whilst laughing at Western media who likes to skip over the NAZI part, as they brag about being NAZI's, showing off tattoos of Swastikas on their backs like in the next video, and they have all been trained by NATO forces to do the dirty fighting that includes using human shields placed in hospital maternity wards and schools. They placed big guns, tanks, and other heavy arms on the roofs and on the bottom floors, all with kidnapped Ukrainian human shields in the middle of the buildings.
Of course, they ensured their own cars were moved from the area before they exploded bombs in the buildings and then claimed Russia had bombed these hospitals and schools from the air. The following video from Redacted have inserts from Tel-SUR, an AZOV soldier bragging about being a NAZI, and debunks the mass grave story which was doing the rounds lately.
So these NAZI's have no qualms about killing other Ukrainians all to blame on Russia, which of course the Western media just repeats as gospel without even a question raised. If it wasn't for the brave journalists on the ground like Patrick Lancaster who has been reporting on the truth of the war in the Donbass for the last 8 years, then many people would be none the wiser about the truth of the civil war that has been raging in east Ukraine for the last 8 years.
Here is a report I doubt any of you would have heard due to the West disbelieving anything that shows Ukrainian war crimes or paints their war with Russia in a bad light, even when the AZOV NAZI brigade kills Ukrainians and use them as human shields as detailed in Patricks video.
The fact that it is actually a proxy war being run by the US and NATO members from the western parts of Ukraine, which they seem to be able to enter and leave by whim, is a fact left out of many people's news on Ukraine's fight with Russia.
Whilst many people believe that they are standing with a proud Ukraine, led by the actor Zelenskyy, who has done nothing to deserve the Russian invasion and wants to win the war with Russia. It is actually the west, NATO, the US, and UK, who are directing the Ukrainian forces from their bases on the edges of the country. A fact that has not gone amiss by Putin and one that has been broadcast many times, for anyone who wants to know the full truth about the invasion.
This is just one report from a French journalist who went to Ukraine only to find out it was a war being run by NATO and the US, not Ukraine.
So when you virtue signal to the world by pinning a Ukrainian flag to your Twitter profile or other social media site, what is it that you are actually standing for?
Does it mean to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, as NATO seems to want, not caring about the civilians caught up in the war or the trapped soldiers with no supplies coming that are told to fight to the death?
Does it mean to pour more and more heavy weaponry into the country, despite the US not knowing where or even caring where it ends up. From one analysis, only 10% of all western arms are getting anywhere near the battlefields as Russian intelligence seems able to blow up most incoming western arms, as well as foreign legion training centres. They also blow up the railroads that would be needed to allow the transport of these arms eastwards where they are actually needed.
Also, recently, Russia warned the UK of an immediate and "proportional response" if it continues direct provocation of Ukraine and warned of the likelihood of nuclear war if NATO members continue to interfere in the war.
Also, a former head of the Polish army has accused Boris Johnson of “tempting evil” by revealing that Ukrainian soldiers were being trained in Poland in how to use British anti-aircraft missiles before returning with them to Ukraine. Gen Waldemar Skrzypczak, also a former junior defence minister, complained that a loose-lipped prime minister had revealed too much to the Russians and that his remarks risked the safety of the soldiers involved.
So more money and western weaponry go down the Ukrainian drain, and we are stupid to think that the Russians would not be able to detect and destroy any heavy weapons we try to smuggle into the country.
The western meddling by sending SAS saboteurs into Lviv, Ukraine, and NATO, who is really running the show, commanding Ukrainian attacks into Russia and the war in general. All thisis only making the day that a proxy war in which we are indebting Ukraine for decades to western banks whilst filling the coffers of the MIC, turns into a full-blown war with Russia closer and closer.
As RT is banned in most places, I have screenshotted their latest headline piece which warns of a nuclear conflict if we continue to fight Russia through Ukraine.
So does standing with Ukraine mean allowing ourselves to be turned into shadows on the pavement due to our political leader's long-held desire to fight Russia?
Their new Satan2 missile has already been shown off to warn us that they can hit us anywhere on earth, defeating any anti-missile defences, and turn a small country like the UK into atomic dust instantly.
So does standing with Ukraine mean to stand with the AZOV NAZI brigade, a term that was all over Western media before the war, but now excuses are made for their views, despite training videos of them all over social media appearing with NAZI symbols on their coats as they get trained by western forces.
Or does it mean to stand with a definitely non-democratic society as Ukraine plainly is?
…the head of the opposition political party which came in 2nd place in the election, and arrested and jailed its leaders (exactly what Putin has been accused of doing)—all with the support of U.S.
The usual solid US allies in Israel are also not happy with the US support of Ukrainian NAZI's who the world went to war to stop in the 30's and 40's as the US lifts bans on funding neo-NAZI Ukrainian groups.
"Last June, Congress passed a resolution intended to block American military funding for Ukraine from being used to provide training or weaponry for the Azov Battalion, an independent unit that had been integrated into the former Soviet Republic’s national guard and was taking part in operations against Russian- backed rebels."
"Called a “neo-Nazi paramilitary militia” by Congressmen John Conyers Jr. and Ted Yoho, who co-sponsored the bipartisan amendment, the battalion has been a source of controversy since its inception. However, Congress is reported to have recently repealed its ban on a Ukrainian militia accused of being neo-Nazi, opening the way for American military assistance."
Or does it mean to stand with the "National Police" (ex AZOV Battalion members), who publicly announced a "cleansing" of the town of Bucha, in which bodies left on the street for a supposed two weeks were not mentioned when the town was reclaimed but then days later when the Russians had long left the town, seemingly freshly killed bodies appeared in videos on social media with claims of war crimes being laid at Russia's feet.
All the bodies had white bands on, either tying their hands behind them or on their arms, some with Russian aid packages by their sides, both clear signs of retribution against Russian sympathisers who took aid from the Russian forces. This was a false flag attack that only Ukraine gained anything from and in which Russian denials are heard by no-one.
New Srebrenica. The Ukrainian city of Bucha was in the hands of 🇷🇺 animals for several weeks. *Local civillians were being executed arbitrarily*, some with hands tied behind their backs, their bodies scattered in the streets of the city.#RussianWarCrimespic.twitter.com/outzejdidO
Now that this and other war crimes blamed on Russia were debunked by video, and the killings of POWS were allowed onto social media, the "Democratic Ukraine" we stand with, has made it illegal to film Russian attacks, lest they be debunked by online sleuths. One such debunking was done at the location of a missile attack at the Kramatorsk train station.
"The relationship of the booster when it came to earth, when assessed to the impact zone of the cluster munitions, provides a reverse azimuth which, even when factoring in a generous margin of error for potential drift, points to territory that was under the exclusive control of the Ukrainian government, which means that there is little doubt that the missile that struck the Kramatorsk train station was fired by a launcher under the operational control of the 19th Missile Brigade, Ukraine’s only Tochka-U-equipped unit..... a forensic evaluation of the missile debris clearly shows that it was launched by the 19th Ukrainian Missile Brigade, based near Dobropolia, some 45 kilometres from Kramatorsk."
This is a source that must be overlooked, just like the BBC, UK State TV if ever a news organisation was if we are also expected to overlook other supposed "biased" sources such as Russia Today.
So does "Standing with Ukraine" mean standing with the journalists who dare speak out about Ukrainian crimes and then just disappear or turn up dead?
Well as the US Pentagon is only too happy to admit, it is to give Russia such a bloody nose and to kill as many Russians as possible.
Here are just a few quotes:
On 24 February, during a White House press conference on the first day of Russia’s invasion, Biden said sanctions are designed not to prevent invasion but to punish Russia after invading “…so the people of Russia know what he has brought on them. That is what this is all about.”, this is despite of course the obvious fact by high inflation numbers and increasing heating costs that Europe is paying a high price to "punish Putin".
On 27 February, James Heappey, UK Minister for the Armed Forces, wrote in the Daily Telegraph: “His failure must be complete; Ukrainian sovereignty must be restored, and the Russian people empowered to see how little he cares for them. In showing them that, Putin’s days as President will surely be numbered… He’ll lose power and he won’t get to choose his successor.”
Finally, on 1 March, Boris Johnson’s spokesperson said the sanctions on Russia “we are introducing, that large parts of the world are introducing, are to bring down the Putin regime.”
So whilst anybody can sympathise with the displaced and killed Ukrainians who had nothing to do with Putin's invasion. It is totally stupid to believe that the act of invading Ukraine was totally irrational to anybody but those still sucking the teat of US/UK mainstream media.
The war began after the US-led Maiden coup in 2014, and the people of Donbass have been fighting a civil war for their rights ever since.
"The referendums conducted by the two self-proclaimed Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk in May 2014, were not referendums of "independence" (независимость), as some unscrupulous journalists have claimed, but referendums of "self-determination" or "autonomy" (самостоятельность). The qualifier "pro-Russian" suggests that Russia was a party to the conflict, which was not the case, and the term "Russian speakers" would have been more honest. Moreover, these referendums were conducted against the advice of Vladimir Putin."
"In fact, these Republics were not seeking to separate from Ukraine, but to have a status of autonomy, guaranteeing them the use of the Russian language as an official language — because the first legislative act of the new government resulting from the American-sponsored overthrow of [the democratically-elected] President Yanukovych, was the abolition, on February 23, 2014, of the Kivalov-Kolesnichenko law of 2012 that made Russian an official language in Ukraine. A bit like if German putschists decided that French and Italian would no longer be official languages in Switzerland."
"This decision caused a storm in the Russian-speaking population. The result was fierce repression against the Russian-speaking regions (Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov, Lugansk and Donetsk) which was carried out beginning in February 2014 and led to a militarization of the situation and some horrific massacres of the Russian population (in Odessa and Mariupol, the most notable)......." read the rest of the article here.
Now if you want to "Stand with Ukraine", then really you should qualify what you mean. I stand with the Ukrainian people who have been displaced and killed by the war, but I also stand with the Ukrainians in the Donbass region who have been discriminated against, massacred, and attacked by the NAZI element in the Ukrainian army that many like to overlook when it comes to this war.
I don't stand with Putin, but I stand with the poor people of Ukraine who will be indebted to US and international banks like the IMF for decades to come for all the weapons poured into the country, only to be mostly destroyed on delivery by the Russians.
Of course, the most powerful country on earth is only too happy to help anyone out in a war, especially against an enemy of their own, even more so if it means that their own weapons companies get paid, and countries are indebted for decades due to their "help".
I don't want to be involved in the West's proxy war with Russia, where they want to fight to the last Ukrainian, not helping those left to rot in the Azovstal factories, as US and UK politicians debate their next attack on Russia.
If it was left to Ukraine, with no western interference, then the peace talks which the Russians started at the same time as their invasion would have concluded by now and there would be some sort of settlement. It is the west who is continuing the slaughter in Ukraine and no one should be in doubt of this fact.
I leave you with this video from the Redacted YouTube channel about the likelihood of this proxy war turning hot as the MIC makes a mint from the selling of weapons to Ukraine.
Please leave a comment and explain what you mean when you say that "You Stand With Ukraine".
TheGrayZone Breaks A Story Which Should Be All Over The MSM
By Dark Politricks
"Reuters, BBC, and Bellingcat participated in covert UK Foreign Office-funded programs to “weaken Russia,” leaked docs reveal"
Max Blumenthal, writes for the thegrayzone.com an explosive piece about the UK/US hypocrisy when it comes to blaming Russia for hacking and interference in elections. All whilst doing the exact same thing to Russia. They are doing this by using major news outlets such as the BBC and Reuters to train up 1000's of YouTuber's, Bloggers and news reporters to push pro NATO propaganda into Russian areas of influence.
"New leaked documents show Reuters’ and the BBC’s involvement in covert UK FCO programs to effect “attitudinal change” and “weaken the Russian state’s influence,” alongside Intel contractors and Bellingcat."
"The UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) have sponsored Reuters and the BBC to conduct a series of covert programs aimed at promoting regime change inside Russia and undermining its government across Eastern Europe and Central Asia, according to a series of leaked documents.
The leaked materials show the Thomson Reuters Foundation and BBC Media Action participating in a covert information warfare campaign aimed at countering Russia. Working through a shadowy department within the UK FCO known as the Counter Disinformation & Media Development (CDMD), the media organizations operated alongside a collection of intelligence contractors in a secret entity known simply as “the Consortium.”
Through training programs of Russian journalists overseen by Reuters, the British Foreign Office sought to produce an “attitudinal change in the participants,” promoting a “positive impact” on their “perception of the UK.”
“These revelations show that when MPs were railing about Russia, British agents were using the BBC and Reuters to deploy precisely the same tactics that politicians and media commentators were accusing Russia of using,” Chris Williamson, a former UK Labour MP who attempted to apply public scrutiny to the CDMD’s covert activities and was stonewalled on national security grounds, told The Grayzone.
“The BBC and Reuters portray themselves as an unimpeachable, impartial, and authoritative source of world news,” Williamson continued, “but both are now hugely compromised by these disclosures. Double standards like this just bring establishment politicians and corporate media hacks into further disrepute.”
Thomson Reuters Foundation spokesperson Jenny Vereker implicitly confirmed the authenticity of the leaked documents in an emailed response to questions from The Grayzone.
However, she contended, “The inference that the Thomson Reuters Foundation was engaged in ‘secret activities’ is inaccurate and misrepresents our work in the public interest. We have for decades openly supported a free press and have worked to help journalists globally to develop the skills needed to report with independence.”
The tranche of leaked files closely resemble UK FCO-related documented released between 2018 and 2020 by a hacking collective calling itself Anonymous. The same source has claimed credit for obtaining the latest round of documents."
They first tweeted out a link to the article last week but then someone in the UK foreign office must have got worried as they managed to get Twitter to put a new tag on their post that the documents in the article may have been obtained by hacking.
This of course only made the Tweet go viral, with Bellingcat trending at one point, and meme after meme followed it up on Social Media, most half baked gamer irrelevant meme's, but still, it got the article noticed.
Now we must all be wondering who the hundreds of YouTube channels and bloggers are who are being paid by the UK Gov to push pro NATO propaganda into Russian areas are. They obviously don't want to be ousted but it will be interesting to see which #altnews outfits comment on this piece in a pro or negative way or just ignore it all together, which I suspect will be the case as I haven't seen any UK News Station report on this breaking story yet in anyway or form, even negatively e.g "Anonymous Hacks Government Reports", with no actual details of the underlying nature of the information hacked..
As Max said on a YouTube video earlier, if the Grayzone had been caught doing the same thing but in the opposite direction, e.g pushing pro-Russian propaganda in the US or UK, it would be all over the nightly news, they would be jailed, hell storms would be generated and even the possibility of real war.
We are already in a proxy war with Russia in the Ukraine, and there is no doubt that the Axis of War is engaged in a new cold war with the remnants of the old Soviet Union, that they bankrupted and stole from when it crumbled in on itself in the 90's, and instead of NATO and Russia facing off and causing a nuclear holocaust, there will be more proxy wars. Just like the one in the Donbass region of eastern Ukraine, especially now that Biden and the Obama/Clinton neo-lib crew, are back in office.
Biden is more interested in getting to war quickly, bombing Syria, and calling it a defensive measure despite not really knowing who it really was who killed the American contractor in northern Iraq that the response was in retaliation for.
They blame Iran of course, and want to start a war with them, however Iran have been truly fighting ISIL in Syria and have been invited to do so, along with Russia, who would have finished the job if it wasn't for Western AXIS of WAR meddling powers protecting Idlib, and the remaining ISIL terrorists they have funded, armed and backed in their war against Assad. The civil war in Syria would now be over.
I am just hoping to see some mention of this MI6 / Bellingcat / Reuters / BBC intelligence move to destabilise Russia in our own news but then we all know from Jon Snow's autobiography that to work for the BBC you have to become an MI6 snitch, push pro establishment stories, ignore anything to do with Israel massacring Palestinians at the border and in return they collect a double salary tax free.
In his autobiography Shooting History, Channel 4 News anchor-man Jon Snow revealed that, in the 1970s, he was approached to spy on "left-wing people" working in television.
He recalls the experience today: "I was contacted [by letter] in between working for LBC and ITN to spy. They wanted me to work for MI6."
Snow then attended a meeting in Whitehall where he was offered a tax-free salary in return for his services.
He adds: "It was suggested I should read the Denning report into the Profumo affair. I never did and instead I read Kim Philby's My Secret War. It was clear from the book that to be a good spy you would have to be a double-agent."
It really does make listening to our establishment and oh so trust worthy BBC more interesting now, to know they are mostly MI5/6 agents, and involved in a massive scandal that should be world wide news.
I am not saying Russia does not hack the US or UK, but for us to claim the moral high ground and pretend we are not doing the exact same thing is just ridiculous and makes us hypocrites.
China, Russia, US, Israel, UK and India are all hacking each other for industrial secrets, an edge on our competitors, some sort of info that will give us a leg up after a massive economic collapse. It happens all the time, but for the BBC to be ousted like this, and then try to get Twitter to deter people from reading the report by putting up a special "These materials may have been obtained by hacking" sign on the Tweet which only made it go viral is really hypocritical.
Listen to Max Blumenthal talk to Aaron Maté about the controversy in this video, I am sure it will be taken down soon, so check on Bitchute.com if it goes down. I just did but couldn't find the video. It said showing 17 from 18 videos, but wouldn't let me see the 18th, so I don't know if they are hiding the relevant video for some reason or not but I just cannot get that 18th video to show up. Maybe someone else knows why it isn't there?
Google can crack any attempt to use their widgets to search out the box but you can help me?
By Dark Politricks
Recently I have had to revert back to a "Google" search widget, one which hardly includes any of the sites I had set it to search from, when you try to think outside the GoogleBox by getting "9.11" or "Syrian War" news.
Not just from sites not recommended as "authority safe" but actually listed as "Fake News" appearing on a list of 550+ sites including mine, compiled by a US Professor to let Facebook automatically flag URLs posted in Direct Messages and Google to not include them in their results.
The top answer I get using this Google widget which is only supposed to search sites I WANT, are of course https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attack, a site about new release of DEBIAN??, and of course the very anti-authortarian https://news.sky.com.Neither site I listed in the clearly labelled box to enter sites you only wanted to search.
Of course this is not just limited to Google preventing you see what you want but even messengering freinds on Facebook something containing a banned link causing an instant block as those sites violate their Community Standurds.
Try it open a Facebook Messenger Chat and just enter the domain name of Veteranstoday.com and see if your message gets sent to you friend. Here is what I get when I try to send 3 links from the "banned list" to a friend and then remember that conspiratorial thought police that would never happen, and how evil Google was to help China install their Internet Firewall preventing Chinese users from accessing the whole web.
When China got Google to break their own "ideology" to "do no evil", if they even ever believed in that fake motto it was to cover their real one, "do whatever to get rich" and of course help the MIC who seeded your start-ups with black money, by creating the strongest firewall for a country as of yet seen. The western liberal nations all lambasted them, that is before countries like, Australia, UK, and many others implemented similar situations. Well what did we all do?
We are still crying "Human Rights Abuses". The Chinese public must be able to access the Internet without censorship. Especially with the #COVID19 virus, the photos of dead bodies were top news, and now with the sudden emergence of people after 3 months of lock-down from Wuhan, the photos, tweets and videos kept alive by Chinese protestors, to only be taken down then re-posted up again, are retold and retold by CNN and the BBC as some sort of bravery that only the Chinese need to do.
What about our human rights abuses?
Just think!
What are we not being told, or not able to access because Facebook, Google and the Silicon Valley/MIC nexus is preventing alternative narratives to the stories that our establishment broadcasters are peddling us. What are they hiding, well just try looking and then you might get a clue or too.
Try searching some of the sites that on the banned list or passing them over social media networks owned by the 3 letter agencies and see what you can and cannot discuss without being instantly labelled a crackpot for having a theory outside the main stream though.
Sheep who read their daily paper full of death gloom and how we must all follow the most stringent anti liberty rules since WWII. News constantly on the TV and Radio, breaks in popular TV shows for Oxbridge Etonian Toriesm to tell us to all stay inside and not go out to "Save the NHS". Well maybe the NHS wouldn't need saving if you hadn't been planning on privatising it, preventing fair pay for junior doctors forced to work 90 hour weeks and allowing all your masonic friends to get bids in whilst the time is right.
Are we in a Police State of our own invention or just too scared to ask "why"?
I have the code for a "Super Search Engine", one that will search multiple sources, remove duplicate URLS and only allow URLS on a "Whitelist" or in this cases Facebook's "Banned List" to appear.
I can place it behind Cloudflare to reduce bandwidth and hide remote IPs, I can create widgets to it for people to embed into blogs to get only "banned" news.
If I had the money I would do it myself but I don't. What I do have are the coding skills to get something like this going. Start it and let someone run off with it. I don't really care who owns it I just would like a search engine that would ONLY search sites they are told to for news they most certainly have listed even if it's ranked on page 500 despite having the best SEO.
Want to help me? Go and donate a few dollars or pounds at a friends site https://www.paypal.me/strictlysoftware and if no-one will donate some server space then maybe I can rent some with enough help.
One for thing is sure, these search engines widget bars to enable you to customise your searches, are pure crap.
Are we creating a false fear of war with North Korea?
By Dark Politricks
As this video shows, this is how the "establishment media" sells wars to the populace by fear mongering and leaving out parts of statements by the "enemy" that would provide context to otherwise threatening language.
Tonight the BBC showed a controversial Panorama programme in which the BBC tricked the London School of Economicsinto allowing their film crew to hop along with a trip of students to the country.
Three journalists accompanied 10 London School of Economics students and spent eight days in the country.
The university and its students' union have demanded the corporation withdraw the programme.
But BBC head of news programmes Ceri Thomas said the North Korean government was the only party the corporation had deceived.
If you can access BBC iPlayer or have the Firefox plugin Modify Headers and can find a UK IP address then you can view the programme (probably tomorrow) here >> Panorama North Korea Undercover
To be fair, the North Korean state is a Stalinist, Nationalist dictatorship in which rule passes down a family line and the new young ruler is most likely showing strength and acting out to secure his position internally.
However despite the rhetoric and the fact that his armed forces are a million strong they are armed with antiquated weaponry, old Russian tanks and rifles and their nuclear bombs are most likely stolen or bought from the black market.
It is true that the North Korean regime is a horrible communist nightmare in which hundreds of thousands of people are locked up in gulags and camps. The people have suffered multiple famines in which grass became the main available food for the "workers" whilst the ruling family and generals most likely ate like kings.
As George Orwell said in Animal Farm, some animals are more equal than others and I suspect that is undoubtedly the case in North Korea right now.
However despite all this the two Korea's are still technically at war. No peace treaty has ever been signed between the North and South since the war ended in the 50's and therefore the two countries are still on a war footing.
The USA is committed to backing up the South and China the North, therefore any miscalculation by the Koreans or American's could easily lead to an outbreak of war. It would be foolish if we allowed this to happen because of propaganda and lies.
We have to realise that North Korea is not stupid.
They saw what happened to Iraq and Libya when they gave up their WMD's. To them, a nuclear weapon is the ultimate guarantee of safety from attack. This is probably the same thinking that the Iranians have.
They have explicitly said this time after time and if anything their ratcheting up of war talk is aimed at getting peace talks started again.
However it is not North Korea preventing a peace treaty between all sides from occurring but the pre-conditions set by the Americans that the North give up all their nuclear ambitions that is stopping a peace treaty from being signed.
Who is the USA, the only country to have used a nuclear bomb in anger, to decide who is and who isn't allowed nuclear weapons?
When we have countries like Israel who are stocked to the teeth with nuclear weaponry being allowed to continue their nuclear ambitions whilst talking about attacking Iran for even thinking about having their own. It is no wonder that North Korea is not willing to give up the ultimate deterrent.
When we are not even willing to budge on our own nuclear capability and allow our friends to own nuclear weapons whilst declaring our enemies ambitions off limits it is no wonder that a large part of the world see's this hypocrisy and then calculates that only by having nuclear bombs will it prevent an attack by the axis of war i.e US/UK/France.
North Korea is not a pleasant place to live and their rulers are despots. However the way to overcome this is by signing a peace treaty, allowing open borders and people from both sides of Korea to cross the border and see that they are not so different after all.
Once North Korea can stop diverting all it's money from it's armed forces to actually modernising it's country then things might change.
However it seems we are once again stuck in the 80's. Trying to defeat a communist regime by bankrupting and starving them to submission by forcing them to spend money they don't have on defensive measures because they are rightly paranoid of attack.
It may have worked with the USSR but North Korea has held on much longer and seems willing to let their citizens resort to eating grass or cannibalism so that it's few resources can be spent maintaining ancient weaponry that would be wiped out immediately if any war started.
Lets just hope people our side of the divide are not fooled into war once again like we were with Iraq and Libya.
The neo-cons are probably flipping coins at the moment deciding whether to attack Iran or North Korea and propaganda like the sort we are constantly being fed at the moment about North Korea threatening to nuke us without giving us the full context is not helping at all.
Remember - find the facts out for yourself and don't rely on the mainstream media for your nightly statements of fear.
View the original article "Are we drumming up a false threat of war with North Korea" at darkpolitricks.com.
