Another US Presidential Election - Nothing Will Change - Again!
By Dark Politricks
Here comes another US Presidential election and another mess for the rest of the world to look to and ask itself:
"Is this really Democracy?"
I think many countries, especially the few left who have any real belief in the US as a "beacon of freedom", will be answering in the negative. Those who know better, or act with the US as cohorts, such as the EU, will keep quiet and pretend the great experiment in "liberty and natural born human rights" created in1776's is continuing.
Those who have been tampered with through US bribery, coups, unfair economic tariffs or sanctions, will again see that the American's cry of "US Freedom and Democracy" that the USA believes is the ideal way to force run other societies, is a lie inside it's own borders.
Nothing will happen to better or change the lives for the average US citizen whoever gets into power. Everyone with half a brain knows the real reigns of power are not controlled by the President or Vice President.
Whoever thought that showing the start of that meeting on public air waves did a severe disservice to anyone with any remaining thoughts that the US elected politicians wielded any real power. They obviously don't if Joe or his wife can run the executive branch of US government.
No one in the world will feel much difference when the Deep State gains further power through the election of supposedly populist Donald Trump, or the blackwashed Kamala Harris.
The powers that stay hidden seem to be backing the blackwashed, grand daughter of Irish slave traders, who according to some has been faking a history so murky it compares to the claims made by Trump back when Obama was running first for President. When Obama's birth certificate and Kenyan heritage, was big news, along with a possible passport issued by the British Empire.
This is something that would have made him illegitimate under US law to hold the highest office in the land. It's probably the same as someone coming from the ex British Crown colony of Jamacia, now in the British Commonwealth. Here is a look into the Democratic nominee for Presidents history, and her family background that she seems to be hiding the truth about.
Candace Owens Looks Into The Blackwashing of Kamala Harris
However, to the real rulers of power it makes little difference who they place in the public facing office. A political patsie to take all the flack the masses may throw at them for the failure of the government to actually do anything to help the people of the country, rather than their donors, the MIC and Big Business.
Those voters actually taking time off work to vote, might think it actually makes a difference what choice they make. Maybe some know that if the Empire wanted to, their swipe on an electronic voting machine could easily be switched in a second to their opponent. It doesn't take Russia to do the hacking, but it helps that they or Iran could be blamed for doing so.
I think it has been clear for years, and with every years Las Vegas Def Con Voting Village competition, even kids are now able to hack the latest voting machines. Therefore it makes it little more than a trivial event for those behind the scenes to switch the voting tally if they cared to do so. Those millions who will vote, will all no doubt make claims of another "stolen election", if their candidate doesn't win.
I still cannot get over the hypocrisy of the Democrats who moaned so much about Trumps dislike of the way the 2020 COVID election was handled. This was when due to the plandemic, votes could just be dropped off in mailboxes with no security to manage or control the access to these important boxes. His claims of foul play were just dismissed as the cries of a bitter loser who wanted to steal the election and other-throw the government.
However, people seem to forget that in 2016, when Trump won, the Democrats made the same claims about a stolen election. Hillary Clinton (who had told Trump to run for office believing him to be an easier contender to beat), was so bemused and angry over her loss to Trump, that she made up a whole 4 year news cycle of lies and distortions that became the infamous and now debunked Russigate hoax.
The Democrats definitely cried foul, and their lackies in the MSM touted as gospel, with nightly bombshell reports from Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, about Russia collusion that all turned out to be false. If there was any real proof that Russia had an agent running as the US POTUS then I think there would have been more than a failed attempt at impeachment.
Although many were destroyed, others were leaked. Most famously the Podesta emails probably sent to WikiLeaks by DNC staffer Seth Rich, who died in a "botched robbery", in which nothing was stolen, and the MSM covered it up as a right wing conspiracy. They just added it to their Russia is to blame for Trump being elected delusion, and their incorrect conclusion that Trump had somehow robbed her of that 2016 election.
The botched robbery maybe true, and maybe Russia hacked the DNC then passed the info along to WikiLeaks. Thousands of GB slowly trickling out of the servers without being noticed. Or maybe someone working there just downloaded them and passed them along on a USB drive.
It seems though that whoever wins the election for the world to clap their hands at and marvel at the "greatest nation on earth" and their Democratic Process, that the fate of the world hangs in the balance whoever becomes the outward face, whether pretending to be someone they are not, or just beholden to foreign interests.
Either compromised through blackmail at an Epstein or P Diddler party, or just beholden to AIPAC or other big money interests seemingly needed by most politicians to run for President or the Senate/Congress.
The MSM is also trying to spin it in case of a successful hit or even not, that Iranian hitmen are all about, and that they are behind the attempts on his life, despite the attempted assassins links to the intelligence services.
However, Trump seems to believe in these claims that it's Iran trying to kill him not Deep State trained nutjobs, that the MIC are using as Patsies. I don't doubt he will go after Iran and back Israel up in their regional war, whether or not he helps close down the Ukrainian threat to global stability and real and potential nuclear conflict with Russia.
It knows that it is US/UK/NATO troops not Ukrainians, that load in the secure satellite based targeting data needed for long range attacks into it's country, and it will declare war on those countries if attacked by Storm Shadows or ATACM missiles.
So whoever becomes the face of the next US government, we can be assured of more US aggression whether its is in Ukraine, or the Middle East.
The MIC and Deep State are not going to let the people of the USA have a real voice at the ballot box.
All that matters is the money those companies like Raytheon and BAe pump in to support Presidential candidates, and paying them back in the best way they know how;
Ukrainian Exploits and Attacks in Russia could lead to Nuclear War
By Dark Politricks
At the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it seemed that some sense prevailed among Western leaders not to engage fully in the war encase that it led to a full-blown NATO v Russian World War 3 scenario.
However as the war progressed, and as"battlefield" experts kept claiming that Russia was on the defence. That their masterplan to storm and take Kyiv with a force at least an eighth of the size needed for the job of taking and controlling a city of millions had been halted, the rhetoric increased wildly, and "preventing World War 3", became "Making Money From Flooding Ukraine With Weapons".
There was of course Ukrainian propaganda showing disillusioned Russian POWS ringing their Mums whilst being filmed (a breach of the Geneva war treaty), and saying they didn't even know they were in Ukraine or had been misled and misfed, however, what would you say to your enemy when captured and not wanting to die on film?
It is no lie that some scared Russian generals had lied to Putin saying that they would be welcomed in every town they passed on the way to Kyiv, and they were quick to be dispatched and replaced by men who could get the job done seeing that the Zelenskyy government did not just fall at the sight of a 40 mile line of tanks outside its capital.
However, this massive force did do its part in "shaping the battlefield" by keeping a large proportion of the Ukrainian army in the west to defend the capital whilst their main objectives in the East were carried out. So sorry to say to the armchair generals, many on the boards of MIC companies who are making money from prolonging this war, that this was in no way a sign that the Ukrainians were "winning".
To remind those people who think the aim of the invasion was just to invade Kyiv, the initial declared objectives were:
Defend and take back the breakaway Russian-speaking parts of the Donbass, Donetsk and Lugansk who had signed a military cooperation treaties with Russiaas it was clear Ukrainian forces were encircling their areas, as well as on the way to take back Crimea who had already broken away from Ukraine years ago.
De-Nazify the Ukrainian military who had encompassed the AZOV Militia into the main army as a brigade and who were the main instigators of the many atrocities and massacres that had occurred during the last 8 years of fighting in the Donbass region.
De-militarise Ukraine so that its NATO trained army was no longer a force to be reckoned with.
Ensure Ukraine did NOT join NATO as was being touted by the Western "Defensive" Organisation.
As I have detailed in past articles, the lies that Russia was told about NATO not moving an inch toward Russia's borders since the fall of the Berlin Wall, and their desire to fight Russia in some way have long been known. Russia is vilified by the US Press at every election for supposed interfering as if the US never interferes in other country's elections, all despite proof coming out that this was just an excuse Hillary Clinton made up due to her loss to an orange-faced game show host.
However, despite Russia being the target of lies to cover Hillary Clinton's Presidential loss, the massive Russophobia that the US clearly had after these lies was not the cause of this current anti-Russian sentiment. The Afghan war was over, the MIC was looking for a new enemy to make money from, and Russia has always been a historical target of the US & UK, and now they have dragged the EU, which up until recently had good relationships with Russia, especially Germany, into their sanction misfire.
So whilst the plan of the sanctions was to crush the Russian economy and hopefully cause an uprising and overthrow of Putin's regime, it has in fact strengthened him and the rouble as the Russian people clearly see that their politician's rhetoric about the West hating Russia, is in fact, very true. This has given Putin carte blanche to go full ahead in his war with Ukraine as the Russian people now realise how Russophobic the west really is.
So as Russia forces EU countries to pay for their gas in roubles not dollars or Euro's, and whilst the EU and US are staggering into a recession, Russia is booming, with a massive surplus of roubles, and has started what looks like the destruction of the Petrodollars reign as currency supreme as they join the two most populous countries in the world, China and India in economic treaties, selling gas to allies on the cheap and cutting it off to European countries who refuse to inflate the value of the rouble by paying for the gas they want in their own currency.
This is a right-wing element who brags on Telegram, whilst laughing at Western media who likes to skip over the NAZI part, as they brag about being NAZI's, showing off tattoos of Swastikas on their backs like in the next video, and they have all been trained by NATO forces to do the dirty fighting that includes using human shields placed in hospital maternity wards and schools. They placed big guns, tanks, and other heavy arms on the roofs and on the bottom floors, all with kidnapped Ukrainian human shields in the middle of the buildings.
Of course, they ensured their own cars were moved from the area before they exploded bombs in the buildings and then claimed Russia had bombed these hospitals and schools from the air. The following video from Redacted have inserts from Tel-SUR, an AZOV soldier bragging about being a NAZI, and debunks the mass grave story which was doing the rounds lately.
So these NAZI's have no qualms about killing other Ukrainians all to blame on Russia, which of course the Western media just repeats as gospel without even a question raised. If it wasn't for the brave journalists on the ground like Patrick Lancaster who has been reporting on the truth of the war in the Donbass for the last 8 years, then many people would be none the wiser about the truth of the civil war that has been raging in east Ukraine for the last 8 years.
Here is a report I doubt any of you would have heard due to the West disbelieving anything that shows Ukrainian war crimes or paints their war with Russia in a bad light, even when the AZOV NAZI brigade kills Ukrainians and use them as human shields as detailed in Patricks video.
The fact that it is actually a proxy war being run by the US and NATO members from the western parts of Ukraine, which they seem to be able to enter and leave by whim, is a fact left out of many people's news on Ukraine's fight with Russia.
Whilst many people believe that they are standing with a proud Ukraine, led by the actor Zelenskyy, who has done nothing to deserve the Russian invasion and wants to win the war with Russia. It is actually the west, NATO, the US, and UK, who are directing the Ukrainian forces from their bases on the edges of the country. A fact that has not gone amiss by Putin and one that has been broadcast many times, for anyone who wants to know the full truth about the invasion.
This is just one report from a French journalist who went to Ukraine only to find out it was a war being run by NATO and the US, not Ukraine.
So when you virtue signal to the world by pinning a Ukrainian flag to your Twitter profile or other social media site, what is it that you are actually standing for?
Does it mean to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, as NATO seems to want, not caring about the civilians caught up in the war or the trapped soldiers with no supplies coming that are told to fight to the death?
Does it mean to pour more and more heavy weaponry into the country, despite the US not knowing where or even caring where it ends up. From one analysis, only 10% of all western arms are getting anywhere near the battlefields as Russian intelligence seems able to blow up most incoming western arms, as well as foreign legion training centres. They also blow up the railroads that would be needed to allow the transport of these arms eastwards where they are actually needed.
Also, recently, Russia warned the UK of an immediate and "proportional response" if it continues direct provocation of Ukraine and warned of the likelihood of nuclear war if NATO members continue to interfere in the war.
Also, a former head of the Polish army has accused Boris Johnson of “tempting evil” by revealing that Ukrainian soldiers were being trained in Poland in how to use British anti-aircraft missiles before returning with them to Ukraine. Gen Waldemar Skrzypczak, also a former junior defence minister, complained that a loose-lipped prime minister had revealed too much to the Russians and that his remarks risked the safety of the soldiers involved.
So more money and western weaponry go down the Ukrainian drain, and we are stupid to think that the Russians would not be able to detect and destroy any heavy weapons we try to smuggle into the country.
The western meddling by sending SAS saboteurs into Lviv, Ukraine, and NATO, who is really running the show, commanding Ukrainian attacks into Russia and the war in general. All thisis only making the day that a proxy war in which we are indebting Ukraine for decades to western banks whilst filling the coffers of the MIC, turns into a full-blown war with Russia closer and closer.
As RT is banned in most places, I have screenshotted their latest headline piece which warns of a nuclear conflict if we continue to fight Russia through Ukraine.
So does standing with Ukraine mean allowing ourselves to be turned into shadows on the pavement due to our political leader's long-held desire to fight Russia?
Their new Satan2 missile has already been shown off to warn us that they can hit us anywhere on earth, defeating any anti-missile defences, and turn a small country like the UK into atomic dust instantly.
So does standing with Ukraine mean to stand with the AZOV NAZI brigade, a term that was all over Western media before the war, but now excuses are made for their views, despite training videos of them all over social media appearing with NAZI symbols on their coats as they get trained by western forces.
Or does it mean to stand with a definitely non-democratic society as Ukraine plainly is?
…the head of the opposition political party which came in 2nd place in the election, and arrested and jailed its leaders (exactly what Putin has been accused of doing)—all with the support of U.S.
The usual solid US allies in Israel are also not happy with the US support of Ukrainian NAZI's who the world went to war to stop in the 30's and 40's as the US lifts bans on funding neo-NAZI Ukrainian groups.
"Last June, Congress passed a resolution intended to block American military funding for Ukraine from being used to provide training or weaponry for the Azov Battalion, an independent unit that had been integrated into the former Soviet Republic’s national guard and was taking part in operations against Russian- backed rebels."
"Called a “neo-Nazi paramilitary militia” by Congressmen John Conyers Jr. and Ted Yoho, who co-sponsored the bipartisan amendment, the battalion has been a source of controversy since its inception. However, Congress is reported to have recently repealed its ban on a Ukrainian militia accused of being neo-Nazi, opening the way for American military assistance."
Or does it mean to stand with the "National Police" (ex AZOV Battalion members), who publicly announced a "cleansing" of the town of Bucha, in which bodies left on the street for a supposed two weeks were not mentioned when the town was reclaimed but then days later when the Russians had long left the town, seemingly freshly killed bodies appeared in videos on social media with claims of war crimes being laid at Russia's feet.
All the bodies had white bands on, either tying their hands behind them or on their arms, some with Russian aid packages by their sides, both clear signs of retribution against Russian sympathisers who took aid from the Russian forces. This was a false flag attack that only Ukraine gained anything from and in which Russian denials are heard by no-one.
New Srebrenica. The Ukrainian city of Bucha was in the hands of 🇷🇺 animals for several weeks. *Local civillians were being executed arbitrarily*, some with hands tied behind their backs, their bodies scattered in the streets of the city.#RussianWarCrimespic.twitter.com/outzejdidO
Now that this and other war crimes blamed on Russia were debunked by video, and the killings of POWS were allowed onto social media, the "Democratic Ukraine" we stand with, has made it illegal to film Russian attacks, lest they be debunked by online sleuths. One such debunking was done at the location of a missile attack at the Kramatorsk train station.
"The relationship of the booster when it came to earth, when assessed to the impact zone of the cluster munitions, provides a reverse azimuth which, even when factoring in a generous margin of error for potential drift, points to territory that was under the exclusive control of the Ukrainian government, which means that there is little doubt that the missile that struck the Kramatorsk train station was fired by a launcher under the operational control of the 19th Missile Brigade, Ukraine’s only Tochka-U-equipped unit..... a forensic evaluation of the missile debris clearly shows that it was launched by the 19th Ukrainian Missile Brigade, based near Dobropolia, some 45 kilometres from Kramatorsk."
This is a source that must be overlooked, just like the BBC, UK State TV if ever a news organisation was if we are also expected to overlook other supposed "biased" sources such as Russia Today.
So does "Standing with Ukraine" mean standing with the journalists who dare speak out about Ukrainian crimes and then just disappear or turn up dead?
Well as the US Pentagon is only too happy to admit, it is to give Russia such a bloody nose and to kill as many Russians as possible.
Here are just a few quotes:
On 24 February, during a White House press conference on the first day of Russia’s invasion, Biden said sanctions are designed not to prevent invasion but to punish Russia after invading “…so the people of Russia know what he has brought on them. That is what this is all about.”, this is despite of course the obvious fact by high inflation numbers and increasing heating costs that Europe is paying a high price to "punish Putin".
On 27 February, James Heappey, UK Minister for the Armed Forces, wrote in the Daily Telegraph: “His failure must be complete; Ukrainian sovereignty must be restored, and the Russian people empowered to see how little he cares for them. In showing them that, Putin’s days as President will surely be numbered… He’ll lose power and he won’t get to choose his successor.”
Finally, on 1 March, Boris Johnson’s spokesperson said the sanctions on Russia “we are introducing, that large parts of the world are introducing, are to bring down the Putin regime.”
So whilst anybody can sympathise with the displaced and killed Ukrainians who had nothing to do with Putin's invasion. It is totally stupid to believe that the act of invading Ukraine was totally irrational to anybody but those still sucking the teat of US/UK mainstream media.
The war began after the US-led Maiden coup in 2014, and the people of Donbass have been fighting a civil war for their rights ever since.
"The referendums conducted by the two self-proclaimed Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk in May 2014, were not referendums of "independence" (независимость), as some unscrupulous journalists have claimed, but referendums of "self-determination" or "autonomy" (самостоятельность). The qualifier "pro-Russian" suggests that Russia was a party to the conflict, which was not the case, and the term "Russian speakers" would have been more honest. Moreover, these referendums were conducted against the advice of Vladimir Putin."
"In fact, these Republics were not seeking to separate from Ukraine, but to have a status of autonomy, guaranteeing them the use of the Russian language as an official language — because the first legislative act of the new government resulting from the American-sponsored overthrow of [the democratically-elected] President Yanukovych, was the abolition, on February 23, 2014, of the Kivalov-Kolesnichenko law of 2012 that made Russian an official language in Ukraine. A bit like if German putschists decided that French and Italian would no longer be official languages in Switzerland."
"This decision caused a storm in the Russian-speaking population. The result was fierce repression against the Russian-speaking regions (Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov, Lugansk and Donetsk) which was carried out beginning in February 2014 and led to a militarization of the situation and some horrific massacres of the Russian population (in Odessa and Mariupol, the most notable)......." read the rest of the article here.
Now if you want to "Stand with Ukraine", then really you should qualify what you mean. I stand with the Ukrainian people who have been displaced and killed by the war, but I also stand with the Ukrainians in the Donbass region who have been discriminated against, massacred, and attacked by the NAZI element in the Ukrainian army that many like to overlook when it comes to this war.
I don't stand with Putin, but I stand with the poor people of Ukraine who will be indebted to US and international banks like the IMF for decades to come for all the weapons poured into the country, only to be mostly destroyed on delivery by the Russians.
Of course, the most powerful country on earth is only too happy to help anyone out in a war, especially against an enemy of their own, even more so if it means that their own weapons companies get paid, and countries are indebted for decades due to their "help".
I don't want to be involved in the West's proxy war with Russia, where they want to fight to the last Ukrainian, not helping those left to rot in the Azovstal factories, as US and UK politicians debate their next attack on Russia.
If it was left to Ukraine, with no western interference, then the peace talks which the Russians started at the same time as their invasion would have concluded by now and there would be some sort of settlement. It is the west who is continuing the slaughter in Ukraine and no one should be in doubt of this fact.
I leave you with this video from the Redacted YouTube channel about the likelihood of this proxy war turning hot as the MIC makes a mint from the selling of weapons to Ukraine.
Please leave a comment and explain what you mean when you say that "You Stand With Ukraine".
Russia could over run NATO forces in Europe within an hour
By Dark Politricks
Don't be scared but Russia could overrun the eastern European NATO forces within an hour and then be heading to Paris like Hitler on a tank within a day.
Even the US admit this.
So please let's not start a nuclear war with Russia over Syria?
Especially seeing on this occasion they are on the right side, fighting terrorists, stopping ISIL funding by destroying stolen oil being delivered to the corrupt Turkish regime and NATO ally, and giving the US a chance to pretend to have split the "moderate" anti-Assad forces (as if there are any), from the hardcore al-Nusra, Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, al-Qaeda, ISIL groups.
Really that shouldn't take a lot of sorting out then really.
However in this different video its gone up to 10. Still not that hard to separate from the nutters?
It looks like we have a lot of moderate rebels to use against Assad doesn't it. No wonder the Axis of War carries on supporting ISIL as they are the only game in town for them.
It's getting very crowded in the Med with a Russian fleet and US, UK, French and Israeli ships all firing missiles into Syria.
Surely this madness has to stop soon before WWIII breaks out.
You know the terrorists we told where to attack a load of Syrian and Russian troops the other year and killed over 60 of them.....ooops sorry, we said, as Russia shot missiles straight into our base of operations killing US, UK, Mossad and other ISIL collaborators with them,
Russia could over run NATO forces in Europe within an hour
By Dark Politricks
Hey everybody, don't be scared but Russia could overrun the eastern European NATO forces within an hour and then be heading to Paris like Hitler on a tank within a day.
Even the US admit this.
So please not start a nuclear war with Rusia over Syria?
Especially seeing on this occasion they are on the right side, fighting terrorists, stopping ISIL funding by destroying stolen oil being delivered to the corrupt Turkish regime and NATO ally, and giving the US a chance to pretend to have split the "moderate" anti-Assad forces (as if there are any), from the hardcore al-Nusra, Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, al-Qaeda, ISIL groups.
Really that shouldn't take a lot of sorting out then really.
However in this different video its gone up to 10. Still not that hard to separate from the nutters?
It looks like we have a lot of moderate rebels to use against Assad doesn't it. No wonder we carry on supporting ISIL as they are the only game in town.
You know the terrorists we told where to attack a load of Syrian and Russian troops last week and killed over 60 of them.....ooops sorry, we said, as Russia shot missiles straight into our base of operations killing US, UK, Mossad and other ISIL collaborators with them,
