Facebook Plugin Might Stop You Reading My Articles
By Dark Politicks
Tonight I did what I used to do when my own server was up and running quite a lot, and that was search on Google for sites that were linking to me.
You can just put site: [sitename] into Google or many other search engines search box and it will return a list of sites that mention the site you have listed.
So I did a search for site: darkpolitricks.com and had a peruse at my leisure to see what BS had been written about me.
Of course I am a Russian Agent that pushes evil ex-commie propaganda on you all, that seems like a given from some of the sites I looked at. It must be due to me not pushing the "lets have a war with Russia"neo-con/neo-liberal line that seems to wash over much of the US governing elite at the moment.
Hey, I admit it. I don't want to burn to a crisp in a nuclear holocaust. I do apologise to any blogger out there that thinks I have a pro-Russian bias.I just don't believe Russia wants a nuclear war, and think you're very stupid if you do want one.
However, what really upset me is when I found my name on a list on a 911 conspiracy site such as http://911blogger.com/news/2016-11-30/list-initial-set-sites-reliably-echo-russian-propaganda. It is using the same list I found on many other sites claiming I am a "useful idiot" or "Russian Disinfo Agent" just because I do things like stick up for Gaza, tell you the history of CIA drug smuggling, and dare tell the history of the Donbass before the war many MSN Sites believe started with Putin's invasion early 2022.
However, I was writing about 9.11 inconsistencies and conspiracies back in the 2000's when I had free hosting at my company. Here are some articles, forget the dates, I have been moved from hosting company to server so many times they are meaningless.
Unfortunately, I posted an article on my site about a Russian missile called the sunbeam or sunburst or something I believe. It was a missile that could beat all US Aircraft carrier defences and one that skimmed across the ocean inches from the sea at Mach 2 to avoid detection. The US had tried to buy some from Russia but was refused only for Russia to sell some to China.
Within an hour of the article going up my webmaster at work came over panicked with a copy of an email he had received. A Cease and Desist warning letter to take the article down ASAP, with a long list of US DOD departments at the bottom such as the US Army, US Airforce, US Marines etc etc.
My webmaster honestly shat his pants and kept looking out of the windows for black helicopters waiting for Mossad to rope down and kill me in plain view. It was funny to watch but my site lost its free hosting and I ended up having to pay stupid money just to host my site on its own as on the server at work my blog was getting more visits than all the other company sites we hosted combined, and that was with me blocking 45% of all traffic from spambots, hack bots and brand bots that just crawl constantly trying to see if anyone is talking about them.
I just don't get why my little blog is on a list with big well-known sites such as informationclearinghouse.info, infowars.com, and presstv.com to name just three. How did this professor find me, am I already on some sort of ban list so that they found me through that, who knows but I take it as given I am already being monitored somehow, from afar from the Australian ECHELON site, or maybe I need to peel back the sticking tape on my webcam so someone at GCHQ or MI5 can watch my lovely mug as I type?
There used to be a page that talked about a Facebook Plugin designed to warn users if they click on a link taking them to one of these 559+ websites. It was a 3-year-old article, and the old link doesn't show the article, but then again my Facebook page for this site has been removed, my main Twitter account blocked, and I have had social media sites and communities removed in the blink of an eye without any consultation before so who knows what the kind Samaritan who apparently complied the list thinks of me?
It seems that the good egg who compiled the list is, Melissa Zimdars, an assistant professor of Communication and Media at Merrimack College. It is none other than she, who and I quote"compiled a list of the most egregious offenders".
I doubt she even knows who I am, however then again if I am on 2 different lists and can't get into the US, I am probably on some sort of no-fly list. I applied for a US visa and was denied, before 9.11 I had gone to Boston, USA twice within a year all with no problem, whilst working for a big International IT company.
If you get blocked by a subscription bar and don't want to be tracked or turn BRAVES sheilds down, or turn off ADblocker extensions you can do some simple client-side hackery in the DOM by removing classes on the element ("Open Developer Tools > Select The Element -> Edit it as HTML -> Remove Classes and inline styles until the block is gone and you can read the page).
Citing a report from some group called PropOrNot listing more than 200 web sites that supposedly pushed Russian propaganda routinely to more than 15 million Americans, the Post – without irony – declared that somehow constituted "scientific evidence" of Russian election-tampering!
So not only am I a pawn in the game being played between Russia and NATO/US with cover from other countries willing to break international law when they cannot get a UN resolution to invade a country, I am also part of the Russiagate conspiracy hoax that stopped Hillary Clinton getting into office.
Well although I am happy to be considered worthy enough to stop a psychotic killer and war-mongering liar get into the Presidency, I didn't do much apart from print the truth back then, something that was written off as Russian disinfo, and could have swayed the election Trumps way but all big social media sites were blocking what we all now know was a real story of corruption e.g the news on Hunter Bidens laptop.
Apparently, despite Russiagate being debunked a hundred and one times, and Clinton officials and lawyers being interviewed and arrested by the FBI for making up false claims, in which fake info based on rumours was given to ex UK spy Christopher Steele, who then compiled a dossier that they then used to "prove" Donald Trump was a Russian agent with a love of prostitutes and pee parties, people still believe this narrative. This is why I have my site to give people the facts other sites don't.
However it has later come out that due to her narcissistic temperament the "Russia did it", claim was literally made up when Hillary Clinton found out she had lost to Trump, someone she actually helped persuade to run for President as she thought she could easily beat him and carry on the Obama administration that helped bring slave markets back to Libya and funnelled guns from there to Syria, and al-Qaeda and ISIS terrorists to try and other throw President Assad.
This is another site with my domain mentioned multiple times, the backlinks don't work as the people are obviously copying and pasting from other sources, and don't bother putting the http:// in front of my site's name to get you here, but the SEO gains would have been nice seeing I am being shadow banned and articles that used be at the top of Google are slipping down and down the page.
Well, to be honest, I feel honoured to be considered a threat somehow to weak minds, Melissa. It seems I am worthy enough to be on this list along with such evil doers as the Drudge Report, Russia Today, and of course the rabid, evil points of view from Antiwar.com. Plus of course, I get to say I am on a ban list with Alex Jones, one of my first conspiracy heroes back in the day he used to rant and rave at the camera like a loon in need of Largactil LOL.
Sometimes I just feel that if a site is not on a list like the ones I have shown you they are not doing enough to fight the establishment narrative and give people an opposing point of view to consider. Surely if you host a show called Redacted, which I do watch, you should be on a ban list along with me, Alex Jones, Natural News, and RT.com. Come on what does it take for new shows that get more viewers than MSN outlets that dare speak the truth about the Nord Stream pipe bombings to get put on our naughty list?
I also found this list of raw site URLs https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BigMcLargeHuge/opensources/master/sources/sources.csv which had me labelled down for "bias" and "conspiracy". Well I don't know what my bias is, but if it's that I am against a 3rd nuclear war, hate fake current and historical narratives and I'm not a "co-incidence theorist" then yes those labels are correct.
It seems this core list has been copied, and amended in some cases across numerous blogs claiming to have a list of "fake news sites", or "sites to be careful reading", whatever that means. If it's that you might find an alternative and possibly more correct view of an event than those spouted by the mainstream media outlets then yes.
I did find it amusing on the site to find under the category "State Run" just the two sites from the countries the US is currently pushing its propaganda for war with, Russia Today and Iran's Press TV.
What I want to know is where was the BBC? You cannot get a more state run organisation than the BBC, a news broadcaster that has the backing of the government in forcing all live TV viewers to fork out over £150 per year to pay for a licence fee that funds the BBC's reporting.
Therefore it is something I expect, to be labelled a conspiracy theorist just because I don't believe in physics that says an aluminium plane cannot fly at 550mph just inches above the ground and punch it's way through 3 rings of re-enforced concrete as supposedly happened at the Pentagon on 9.11. If I threw an empty can of coke at my bedroom wall would you expect it to just bounce off or go directly through it as if it had been the weight of a rock with some Semtex attached?
Oh and you must call me anti-Semitic for daring report what many US news stations did on the day of 9.11 about the "dancing Israelis", flicking lighters and positioned where no-one else would know to be, filming the first plane hit the Twin Towers. Known Mossad agents who were released by the FBI without charge and went onto an Israeli TV show to claim that they were, "just documenting the event".
And I must be a "hate speech" site for daring to talk about how Israel is assassinating hundreds of Palestinians at the fence that divides them from their old stolen homes. Or how the Mossad stole British passports to use in their assassination of a Hamas leader in Dubai, or show the YouTube video recording of two IDF soldiers shooting 9 bullets into the back of an injured US citizen, Furkan Dogan, on their high seas attack on the Mavi Marmara.
Then of course I must fall into the most evil category at all as well. No-one can point out that Auschwitz itself has decreased the number of people that died within it's rebuilt walls from 6 million down to under a millionwithout being a blatant liar and holocaust denier. I guess the people running the camp, and the historians who have lowered the number from a round perfect 6 million, a number that is stated in the Torah as the number of Jews who must die before they can return to Israel, must fall into the same category as me?
So what do to if these blogs and sites are correct, and my site is on these lists to be considered so dangerous as to warn anyone visiting that it's not a reliable source?
Well what we need is a real "Alternative News" search engine. I did attempt creating one on my old site, I basically just returned Google's results as DuckDuckGo.com does through a proxy server to remove all the trackers, and then I had a list of sites such as the BBC, MSBC, CNN and other "authoritative news sources" that I removed from the results.
However that server is not running anymore and I doubt anyone out there is going to create a real #altnews search engine. I tried creating one using Googles Search Engine tools that used to be at the top of the page but then Google took it down, along with all my ad revenue from them and I am left with nothing.
I can only try my best to use what I can, I am probably on the way out in my 40's but with several chromic severe conditions that have seen me spend a week per month in the local hospital for the last 3 months, and a month stint in August last year and another week in June 2001, all after I took that evil AstraZ jab. I didn't want it but my parents live local and wouldn't even see me unless I took an LFT test and sent them a picture of the result.
However they were nice enough to give me COVID last month, and whilst in hospital for this months stint (I only got out two days ago), I was in a bay where everyone got COVID and moved. I was the only one that didn't get it probably due to having anti-bodies still in me.
Still I had to ask for a test despite the whole bay having COVID apart from me. I had to really kick off, go through 3 nurses and a matron and demand one from a doctor just to get a negative result. The new hospital policy says you only get a test if you are showing symptoms well when I had COVID my temp was 34.1C, not exactly steaming, and plus it takes days to show symptoms anyway.
I just cannot believe last month when I was in hospital they were trialling a new computer system called EPIC where QR codes were scanned before any meds given out and this month they were already calling it an EPIC failure and printing everything out on paper as it was easier to use.
Hey, what's another £20bn down the drain trying to modernise the NHS and put everything on computer. The last £20bn system was a mess and never used, and this one will be the same. We would have got a better return sending it over to Ukraine for the Russians to blow up on delivery but then that is another post! Go have a read, I have a lot of coverage of the Donbass war on this site, and share it with your friends.
What I would do be a dumb sheep again and not know the things I do!
I hate to say this but please donate if you can, I am doing this on my own, without funding and I am on ban lists and no fly lists for taking the time to write these articles.
They had a relationship that allowed them to implant their own chips into the PC's.
It is widely suggested that the chip allowed the NSA to bypass any security measures that the user of the machine may have installed.
From the article:
The approval mechanism was introduced to ensure that the weak encryption in non-US versions of Windows could not be replaced with stronger software without it being checked against a "key" embedded in Windows, proving that it had been digitally signed off by Microsoft.
Ukrainian Exploits and Attacks in Russia could lead to Nuclear War
By Dark Politricks
At the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it seemed that some sense prevailed among Western leaders not to engage fully in the war encase that it led to a full-blown NATO v Russian World War 3 scenario.
However as the war progressed, and as"battlefield" experts kept claiming that Russia was on the defence. That their masterplan to storm and take Kyiv with a force at least an eighth of the size needed for the job of taking and controlling a city of millions had been halted, the rhetoric increased wildly, and "preventing World War 3", became "Making Money From Flooding Ukraine With Weapons".
There was of course Ukrainian propaganda showing disillusioned Russian POWS ringing their Mums whilst being filmed (a breach of the Geneva war treaty), and saying they didn't even know they were in Ukraine or had been misled and misfed, however, what would you say to your enemy when captured and not wanting to die on film?
It is no lie that some scared Russian generals had lied to Putin saying that they would be welcomed in every town they passed on the way to Kyiv, and they were quick to be dispatched and replaced by men who could get the job done seeing that the Zelenskyy government did not just fall at the sight of a 40 mile line of tanks outside its capital.
However, this massive force did do its part in "shaping the battlefield" by keeping a large proportion of the Ukrainian army in the west to defend the capital whilst their main objectives in the East were carried out. So sorry to say to the armchair generals, many on the boards of MIC companies who are making money from prolonging this war, that this was in no way a sign that the Ukrainians were "winning".
To remind those people who think the aim of the invasion was just to invade Kyiv, the initial declared objectives were:
Defend and take back the breakaway Russian-speaking parts of the Donbass, Donetsk and Lugansk who had signed a military cooperation treaties with Russiaas it was clear Ukrainian forces were encircling their areas, as well as on the way to take back Crimea who had already broken away from Ukraine years ago.
De-Nazify the Ukrainian military who had encompassed the AZOV Militia into the main army as a brigade and who were the main instigators of the many atrocities and massacres that had occurred during the last 8 years of fighting in the Donbass region.
De-militarise Ukraine so that its NATO trained army was no longer a force to be reckoned with.
Ensure Ukraine did NOT join NATO as was being touted by the Western "Defensive" Organisation.
As I have detailed in past articles, the lies that Russia was told about NATO not moving an inch toward Russia's borders since the fall of the Berlin Wall, and their desire to fight Russia in some way have long been known. Russia is vilified by the US Press at every election for supposed interfering as if the US never interferes in other country's elections, all despite proof coming out that this was just an excuse Hillary Clinton made up due to her loss to an orange-faced game show host.
However, despite Russia being the target of lies to cover Hillary Clinton's Presidential loss, the massive Russophobia that the US clearly had after these lies was not the cause of this current anti-Russian sentiment. The Afghan war was over, the MIC was looking for a new enemy to make money from, and Russia has always been a historical target of the US & UK, and now they have dragged the EU, which up until recently had good relationships with Russia, especially Germany, into their sanction misfire.
So whilst the plan of the sanctions was to crush the Russian economy and hopefully cause an uprising and overthrow of Putin's regime, it has in fact strengthened him and the rouble as the Russian people clearly see that their politician's rhetoric about the West hating Russia, is in fact, very true. This has given Putin carte blanche to go full ahead in his war with Ukraine as the Russian people now realise how Russophobic the west really is.
So as Russia forces EU countries to pay for their gas in roubles not dollars or Euro's, and whilst the EU and US are staggering into a recession, Russia is booming, with a massive surplus of roubles, and has started what looks like the destruction of the Petrodollars reign as currency supreme as they join the two most populous countries in the world, China and India in economic treaties, selling gas to allies on the cheap and cutting it off to European countries who refuse to inflate the value of the rouble by paying for the gas they want in their own currency.
This is a right-wing element who brags on Telegram, whilst laughing at Western media who likes to skip over the NAZI part, as they brag about being NAZI's, showing off tattoos of Swastikas on their backs like in the next video, and they have all been trained by NATO forces to do the dirty fighting that includes using human shields placed in hospital maternity wards and schools. They placed big guns, tanks, and other heavy arms on the roofs and on the bottom floors, all with kidnapped Ukrainian human shields in the middle of the buildings.
Of course, they ensured their own cars were moved from the area before they exploded bombs in the buildings and then claimed Russia had bombed these hospitals and schools from the air. The following video from Redacted have inserts from Tel-SUR, an AZOV soldier bragging about being a NAZI, and debunks the mass grave story which was doing the rounds lately.
So these NAZI's have no qualms about killing other Ukrainians all to blame on Russia, which of course the Western media just repeats as gospel without even a question raised. If it wasn't for the brave journalists on the ground like Patrick Lancaster who has been reporting on the truth of the war in the Donbass for the last 8 years, then many people would be none the wiser about the truth of the civil war that has been raging in east Ukraine for the last 8 years.
Here is a report I doubt any of you would have heard due to the West disbelieving anything that shows Ukrainian war crimes or paints their war with Russia in a bad light, even when the AZOV NAZI brigade kills Ukrainians and use them as human shields as detailed in Patricks video.
The fact that it is actually a proxy war being run by the US and NATO members from the western parts of Ukraine, which they seem to be able to enter and leave by whim, is a fact left out of many people's news on Ukraine's fight with Russia.
Whilst many people believe that they are standing with a proud Ukraine, led by the actor Zelenskyy, who has done nothing to deserve the Russian invasion and wants to win the war with Russia. It is actually the west, NATO, the US, and UK, who are directing the Ukrainian forces from their bases on the edges of the country. A fact that has not gone amiss by Putin and one that has been broadcast many times, for anyone who wants to know the full truth about the invasion.
This is just one report from a French journalist who went to Ukraine only to find out it was a war being run by NATO and the US, not Ukraine.
So when you virtue signal to the world by pinning a Ukrainian flag to your Twitter profile or other social media site, what is it that you are actually standing for?
Does it mean to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, as NATO seems to want, not caring about the civilians caught up in the war or the trapped soldiers with no supplies coming that are told to fight to the death?
Does it mean to pour more and more heavy weaponry into the country, despite the US not knowing where or even caring where it ends up. From one analysis, only 10% of all western arms are getting anywhere near the battlefields as Russian intelligence seems able to blow up most incoming western arms, as well as foreign legion training centres. They also blow up the railroads that would be needed to allow the transport of these arms eastwards where they are actually needed.
Also, recently, Russia warned the UK of an immediate and "proportional response" if it continues direct provocation of Ukraine and warned of the likelihood of nuclear war if NATO members continue to interfere in the war.
Also, a former head of the Polish army has accused Boris Johnson of “tempting evil” by revealing that Ukrainian soldiers were being trained in Poland in how to use British anti-aircraft missiles before returning with them to Ukraine. Gen Waldemar Skrzypczak, also a former junior defence minister, complained that a loose-lipped prime minister had revealed too much to the Russians and that his remarks risked the safety of the soldiers involved.
So more money and western weaponry go down the Ukrainian drain, and we are stupid to think that the Russians would not be able to detect and destroy any heavy weapons we try to smuggle into the country.
The western meddling by sending SAS saboteurs into Lviv, Ukraine, and NATO, who is really running the show, commanding Ukrainian attacks into Russia and the war in general. All thisis only making the day that a proxy war in which we are indebting Ukraine for decades to western banks whilst filling the coffers of the MIC, turns into a full-blown war with Russia closer and closer.
As RT is banned in most places, I have screenshotted their latest headline piece which warns of a nuclear conflict if we continue to fight Russia through Ukraine.
So does standing with Ukraine mean allowing ourselves to be turned into shadows on the pavement due to our political leader's long-held desire to fight Russia?
Their new Satan2 missile has already been shown off to warn us that they can hit us anywhere on earth, defeating any anti-missile defences, and turn a small country like the UK into atomic dust instantly.
So does standing with Ukraine mean to stand with the AZOV NAZI brigade, a term that was all over Western media before the war, but now excuses are made for their views, despite training videos of them all over social media appearing with NAZI symbols on their coats as they get trained by western forces.
Or does it mean to stand with a definitely non-democratic society as Ukraine plainly is?
…the head of the opposition political party which came in 2nd place in the election, and arrested and jailed its leaders (exactly what Putin has been accused of doing)—all with the support of U.S.
The usual solid US allies in Israel are also not happy with the US support of Ukrainian NAZI's who the world went to war to stop in the 30's and 40's as the US lifts bans on funding neo-NAZI Ukrainian groups.
"Last June, Congress passed a resolution intended to block American military funding for Ukraine from being used to provide training or weaponry for the Azov Battalion, an independent unit that had been integrated into the former Soviet Republic’s national guard and was taking part in operations against Russian- backed rebels."
"Called a “neo-Nazi paramilitary militia” by Congressmen John Conyers Jr. and Ted Yoho, who co-sponsored the bipartisan amendment, the battalion has been a source of controversy since its inception. However, Congress is reported to have recently repealed its ban on a Ukrainian militia accused of being neo-Nazi, opening the way for American military assistance."
Or does it mean to stand with the "National Police" (ex AZOV Battalion members), who publicly announced a "cleansing" of the town of Bucha, in which bodies left on the street for a supposed two weeks were not mentioned when the town was reclaimed but then days later when the Russians had long left the town, seemingly freshly killed bodies appeared in videos on social media with claims of war crimes being laid at Russia's feet.
All the bodies had white bands on, either tying their hands behind them or on their arms, some with Russian aid packages by their sides, both clear signs of retribution against Russian sympathisers who took aid from the Russian forces. This was a false flag attack that only Ukraine gained anything from and in which Russian denials are heard by no-one.
New Srebrenica. The Ukrainian city of Bucha was in the hands of 🇷🇺 animals for several weeks. *Local civillians were being executed arbitrarily*, some with hands tied behind their backs, their bodies scattered in the streets of the city.#RussianWarCrimespic.twitter.com/outzejdidO
Now that this and other war crimes blamed on Russia were debunked by video, and the killings of POWS were allowed onto social media, the "Democratic Ukraine" we stand with, has made it illegal to film Russian attacks, lest they be debunked by online sleuths. One such debunking was done at the location of a missile attack at the Kramatorsk train station.
"The relationship of the booster when it came to earth, when assessed to the impact zone of the cluster munitions, provides a reverse azimuth which, even when factoring in a generous margin of error for potential drift, points to territory that was under the exclusive control of the Ukrainian government, which means that there is little doubt that the missile that struck the Kramatorsk train station was fired by a launcher under the operational control of the 19th Missile Brigade, Ukraine’s only Tochka-U-equipped unit..... a forensic evaluation of the missile debris clearly shows that it was launched by the 19th Ukrainian Missile Brigade, based near Dobropolia, some 45 kilometres from Kramatorsk."
This is a source that must be overlooked, just like the BBC, UK State TV if ever a news organisation was if we are also expected to overlook other supposed "biased" sources such as Russia Today.
So does "Standing with Ukraine" mean standing with the journalists who dare speak out about Ukrainian crimes and then just disappear or turn up dead?
Well as the US Pentagon is only too happy to admit, it is to give Russia such a bloody nose and to kill as many Russians as possible.
Here are just a few quotes:
On 24 February, during a White House press conference on the first day of Russia’s invasion, Biden said sanctions are designed not to prevent invasion but to punish Russia after invading “…so the people of Russia know what he has brought on them. That is what this is all about.”, this is despite of course the obvious fact by high inflation numbers and increasing heating costs that Europe is paying a high price to "punish Putin".
On 27 February, James Heappey, UK Minister for the Armed Forces, wrote in the Daily Telegraph: “His failure must be complete; Ukrainian sovereignty must be restored, and the Russian people empowered to see how little he cares for them. In showing them that, Putin’s days as President will surely be numbered… He’ll lose power and he won’t get to choose his successor.”
Finally, on 1 March, Boris Johnson’s spokesperson said the sanctions on Russia “we are introducing, that large parts of the world are introducing, are to bring down the Putin regime.”
So whilst anybody can sympathise with the displaced and killed Ukrainians who had nothing to do with Putin's invasion. It is totally stupid to believe that the act of invading Ukraine was totally irrational to anybody but those still sucking the teat of US/UK mainstream media.
The war began after the US-led Maiden coup in 2014, and the people of Donbass have been fighting a civil war for their rights ever since.
"The referendums conducted by the two self-proclaimed Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk in May 2014, were not referendums of "independence" (независимость), as some unscrupulous journalists have claimed, but referendums of "self-determination" or "autonomy" (самостоятельность). The qualifier "pro-Russian" suggests that Russia was a party to the conflict, which was not the case, and the term "Russian speakers" would have been more honest. Moreover, these referendums were conducted against the advice of Vladimir Putin."
"In fact, these Republics were not seeking to separate from Ukraine, but to have a status of autonomy, guaranteeing them the use of the Russian language as an official language — because the first legislative act of the new government resulting from the American-sponsored overthrow of [the democratically-elected] President Yanukovych, was the abolition, on February 23, 2014, of the Kivalov-Kolesnichenko law of 2012 that made Russian an official language in Ukraine. A bit like if German putschists decided that French and Italian would no longer be official languages in Switzerland."
"This decision caused a storm in the Russian-speaking population. The result was fierce repression against the Russian-speaking regions (Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov, Lugansk and Donetsk) which was carried out beginning in February 2014 and led to a militarization of the situation and some horrific massacres of the Russian population (in Odessa and Mariupol, the most notable)......." read the rest of the article here.
Now if you want to "Stand with Ukraine", then really you should qualify what you mean. I stand with the Ukrainian people who have been displaced and killed by the war, but I also stand with the Ukrainians in the Donbass region who have been discriminated against, massacred, and attacked by the NAZI element in the Ukrainian army that many like to overlook when it comes to this war.
I don't stand with Putin, but I stand with the poor people of Ukraine who will be indebted to US and international banks like the IMF for decades to come for all the weapons poured into the country, only to be mostly destroyed on delivery by the Russians.
Of course, the most powerful country on earth is only too happy to help anyone out in a war, especially against an enemy of their own, even more so if it means that their own weapons companies get paid, and countries are indebted for decades due to their "help".
I don't want to be involved in the West's proxy war with Russia, where they want to fight to the last Ukrainian, not helping those left to rot in the Azovstal factories, as US and UK politicians debate their next attack on Russia.
If it was left to Ukraine, with no western interference, then the peace talks which the Russians started at the same time as their invasion would have concluded by now and there would be some sort of settlement. It is the west who is continuing the slaughter in Ukraine and no one should be in doubt of this fact.
I leave you with this video from the Redacted YouTube channel about the likelihood of this proxy war turning hot as the MIC makes a mint from the selling of weapons to Ukraine.
Please leave a comment and explain what you mean when you say that "You Stand With Ukraine".
Well tonight as I went onto Twitter in BRAVE, I found myself taken to a special page as I started to write a Tweet.
It told me I had been banned for spreading misinformation on the COVID Vaccines.
It then showed the tweet underneath. I would embed it if I could, obviously, and just wish I had taken a screenshot now before it was too late.
The thing is that the Tweet did not even mention vaccines, it talked about a conspiracy maybe being true but about the rich DAVOS 1% of 1% who have made billions from our worldwide lockdowns and was 100% true.
It went roughly something like this.....
"I guess the conspiracy over COVID might be true, if the DAVOS crowd invested in companies developing DNA/RNA vaccines before the outbreak, did a war game exercise of how a SARS type virus would spread and the likely re-action to it, and how did Dr Fauci know to state that there would be a pandemic under Trump's Presidency..."
So not really anything about taking or not taking a medical procedure that countries are forcing people to have and then creating a two tier society of people with COVID passports and those without. People who can enter most shops, bars, cinemas and clubs with the flash of Smart Phone app - or paper if you don't have a smart phone. Then those who have not taken the vaccine either on religious, moral or heath advice.
However my Tweet was not about any of that.
It was about the fact that a very small group of men and women have profited off our misery during the pandemic, almost as if they knew a virus outbreak was on it's way, I cannot prove that but the fact they were buying up shares in companies doing DNA/RNA vaccines, and investing in companies that they knew would be doing very good business in a locked up society such as Amazon and Microsoft does sound more than a coincidence.
It is also about the fact that they had ample time to prepare for those pandemic due to the "Dark Winter" simulations run earlier in 2019 that were a pre-cursor to the real pandemic which you can read about here: Dark Winter Pandemic Simulations..
Why would billionaires be buying up shares in vaccine companies and why would Dr Fauci when told by President Obama to stop his"gain of function"virus tests go ahead with another company to run them in the WuHan laboratory and state publicly that there would be a pandemic during Trump's Presidency.
So I wasn't telling anyone on Twitter to get a vaccine or not to get one due to conspiracy theories that the vaccine changed your DNA, or was a wrapper for some other type of disease that would later on spread a different virus, more deadlier to those who got vaccinated.
There are a load of stupid theories going around but what is not fake news, or a made up story is the FACT that the DAVOS members made billions during the pandemic by investing in companies who would see their share price rocket and the question is how did they know to do that at just the right time?
It was only a question about how did they know to invest in companies and make billions from companies that were going to produce the vaccines that the world's populations would be taking.
So as my old @darkpolitricks Twitter account is in suspended status with no more tweets going onto it, I have changed the side bar to use my backup account @darkpoltweeter, which you can follow on Twitter, DM or message me there.
I have also created a new newspaper from that Twitter account which I have put on this site at the top. I don't know what features I will lose in 5 days when my "trial" is up as the paper I had before was based on Tweets, Videos and Stories and didn't really change in the free version.
Where Americans in America reporting on American news get called "Foreign Agents".
They call it Russian state news, despite everyone and the studio being in the US and reporting on American issues not Russian ones.
I suppose it's just the same as MSNBC, NBC, CNN, FOX who are really state mouthpieces due to all the CIA agents working with them who come on their shows to push the establishment move for more war.
Operations COINTELPRO and OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD are CIA programs still in use to this day to feed viewers fake or one sided news, never tell the real story about how many people they are killing and keep the people dumb to what the US is really doing to countries in this world.
This includes illegal wars, coups, breaking international law, propping up dictators, training death squads at the School of the Americas or just standard arming of our supposed enemies like Al-Qaeda and ISIS instead of fighting them alongside the Russians to get rid of them.
So really if you want real news about the USA you have to look at other countries news coverage about the country as the big networks are all owned by the MIC and will support US troops in any war at any time even if it's wrong and illegal.
You might have been told that RT.com is all Russian propaganda but it's the sort of REAL JOURNALISM that should be done by CNN MSNBC, FOX etc.
It looks at events MSNBC or FOX never cover such as the massive genocide the US is currently engaged in in Yemen with the Saudi's.
It looks at the illegal wars most people don't even realise the US is fighting with men on the ground and drones in Africa.
It looks at the Industrial Prison Complex set up to use prisoners as slaves and their recent strike as well the usual Military Industrial Complex lobbying for more war and how stupid it is.
Trump sold the Saudi's all those billion dollars worth of weapons so they might as well use them to attack the poorest nation on Earth and kill kids with Cholera due to a national epidemic and health crisis that has come from the war.
Really if that 9.11 report was real and those 29 pages were accepted as real by the US government why didn't the US attack Saudi Arabia?
The whole population would be demanding that the US go to war with Saudi Arabia. Instead we help them commit a genocide and sell them weapons to be passed on to the Jihadists in Syria.
It is time to admit, if you haven't already, that we are on the WRONG side of the right line in current national affairs.
Did your favourite MSM news station tell you about the massive war games in Russia with Chinese troops alongside that will be ending on the last day of the supposed "Peace Conference" over Syria.
300,000 Russian troops and weapons, using live fire, all on the move, using battle experienced troops on terrain similar to Syria.
This is like a whole city moving around and there is talk that tactical nukes might be moved to Syria if the US doesn't pay heed to the new Russian weapon systems including combat suits that are flame resistant and their drone anti aircraft missiles that the US tried to buy and the Russian's said no and sold them to China instead. Don't forget their state of the art anti aircraft systems as well.
A Russian General called it necessary and our last chance.
I guess they are hoping to show the West that they are ready for a fight and hopefully scare them off, otherwise they are ready to go toe to toe with us.
Did MSNBC mention any of that on last nights news?
Well don't worry, this is why you should follow alternative news instead e.g #altnews. Redacted Tonight is a good place to start, as it uses satire and humour to help you wash down the distasteful new US atrocities committed in your name without your knowledge.
This week the Redacted News team take a look at how easy it is to hack a modern day US voting machine to flip votes. Only 1 minute required to flip the whole lot with direct access.
They also cover how Jeff Bezos, the richest living man in the world, could easily solve world hunger, give everyone clean drinking water, pay for health care and still have millions left in his pocket.
He is so deep in with the CIA and owns the Washington Post that whilst Amazon destroys local shopping centres, he could be saving the world.
View the video about "Where Americans should come to get REAL news about their country and how criminal it is" at YouTube.
This video is worth watching if you are still getting mad about #Russiagate, thinking Russia was hacking into machines and trying to fix the US election.
Trump may have got information from the Russians but Clinton got her foreign information from Ukraine through a middle man - ex UK spy - who got it from ...... Russia.
So if there is going to be an investigation on Trump and Russia, then there should be one on Hillary and her own dossier, her failure to hand over private "hacked" servers to the FBI, and their excuse for losing to Trump on Russia and a push for WWIII .
,WWIII
This is all over a #NothingBurger and #RussiaGate, something even MSM news watchers are getting tired of.
I will let Kyle tell the story for you and watch the CNN host get stunned by calls from his viewers about his constant going on about Russia just so the Democrats don't have to analyse their last election and where they went wrong.
They went wrong by not including progressive ideas and just attacking Trump. The leaked DNC emails showed they were corrupt for giving Hilary front row, smearing Bernie, and keeping all the money for her to spend on the election.
How did that work without Bernies policies and more of free Medicare, free University, less war, more jobs and a crack down on Wall St. The party lost millions of supporters as well as politicians and it will be hard to get them back if all they talk about is Russia.
All this could have been paid for by the trillion dollars of debt that Trump has already added to the national debt with help from the Democrats when they all voted for him to have his $800 billion for the military and his "wall" with Mexico.
A few closures of foreign military bases as well which are well overdue such as in the UK, Germany and other spots not geo-politically placed to surround Russia or China.
Watch and learn.
So even CNN hosts are shocked when their callers ring in and complaining that they don't care about his spiel on #Russiagate. He does it just to keep his company owners and advertisers happy, and of course blame President Trump on Russia and being Putins puppet, NOT the fact that the Democrats put the most hated politician in the country up against him.
The Democrats need some real policies.
In fact the "dove" party is driving the country towards a war with Russia and all over stupid Russian Facebook adverts and a few meetings that were bugged illegally through FISA court warrants obtained by using leaked info to Yahoo to back them up.
So it's a video worth watching seeing that the "left" (who are now right wing) are pushing for war, and calling for Trump to "defend the country". There were even people on Chis Hayes show who claimed it was just as bad as Pearl Harbour and 9.11, that is apart from no-one died and we got a numpty for President instead of a career politician who wants war with Russia.