Am I going down the Google plughole of alternative sites?

Facebook Plugin Might Stop You Reading My Articles

By Dark Politicks

Tonight I did what I used to do when my own server was up and running quite a lot, and that was search on Google for sites that were linking to me.

You can just put site: [sitename] into Google or many other search engines search box and it will return a list of sites that mention the site you have listed.

So I did a search for site: darkpolitricks.com and had a peruse at my leisure to see what BS had been written about me. 

Of course I am a Russian Agent that pushes evil ex-commie propaganda on you all, that seems like a given from some of the sites I looked at. It must be due to me not pushing the "lets have a war with Russia" neo-con/neo-liberal line that seems to wash over much of the US governing elite at the moment.

Hey, I admit it. I don't want to burn to a crisp in a nuclear holocaust. I do apologise to any blogger out there that thinks I have a pro-Russian bias. I just don't believe Russia wants a nuclear war, and think you're very stupid if you do want one.

So many sites have had me on lists then their page disappears from the web but I can still prove I am on the list with this site called Wikispooks, or if you go here to see the PropOrNot list of the most egregious offenders >> https://www.propornot.com/p/the-list.html

Here is another site with my site on a list > https://vigilantcitizenforums.com/threads/websites-like-vc.700/page-2

However, what really upset me is when I found my name on a list on a 911 conspiracy site such as http://911blogger.com/news/2016-11-30/list-initial-set-sites-reliably-echo-russian-propaganda. It is using the same list I found on many other sites claiming I am a "useful idiot" or "Russian Disinfo Agent" just because I do things like stick up for Gaza, tell you the history of CIA drug smuggling, and dare tell the history of the Donbass before the war many MSN Sites believe started with Putin's invasion early 2022.  

However, I was writing about 9.11 inconsistencies and conspiracies back in the 2000's when I had free hosting at my company. Here are some articles, forget the dates, I have been moved from hosting company to server so many times they are meaningless.

• http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2018/12/911-skeptics-versus-logic-reason-and.html
• http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2021/02/from-911-to-covid-pandemic.html
• http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2018/12/a-cia-agents-deathbed-confession-to.html
• http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2013/08/can-pentagon-attack-finally-be-solved.html

Unfortunately, I posted an article on my site about a Russian missile called the sunbeam or sunburst or something I believe. It was a missile that could beat all US Aircraft carrier defences and one that skimmed across the ocean inches from the sea at Mach 2 to avoid detection. The US had tried to buy some from Russia but was refused only for Russia to sell some to China. 

Within an hour of the article going up my webmaster at work came over panicked with a copy of an email he had received. A Cease and Desist warning letter to take the article down ASAP, with a long list of US DOD departments at the bottom such as the US Army, US Airforce, US Marines etc etc. 

My webmaster honestly shat his pants and kept looking out of the windows for black helicopters waiting for Mossad to rope down and kill me in plain view. It was funny to watch but my site lost its free hosting and I ended up having to pay stupid money just to host my site on its own as on the server at work my blog was getting more visits than all the other company sites we hosted combined, and that was with me blocking 45% of all traffic from spambots, hack bots and brand bots that just crawl constantly trying to see if anyone is talking about them.

I just don't get why my little blog is on a list with big well-known sites such as informationclearinghouse.info, infowars.com, and presstv.com to name just three. How did this professor find me, am I already on some sort of ban list so that they found me through that, who knows but I take it as given I am already being monitored somehow, from afar from the Australian ECHELON site, or maybe I need to peel back the sticking tape on my webcam so someone at GCHQ or MI5 can watch my lovely mug as I type?

There used to be a page that talked about a Facebook Plugin designed to warn users if they click on a link taking them to one of these 559+ websites. It was a 3-year-old article, and the old link doesn't show the article, but then again my Facebook page for this site has been removed, my main Twitter account blocked, and I have had social media sites and communities removed in the blink of an eye without any consultation before so who knows what the kind Samaritan who apparently complied the list thinks of me? 

It seems that the good egg who compiled the list is, Melissa Zimdars, an assistant professor of Communication and Media at Merrimack College. It is none other than she, who and I quote "compiled a list of the most egregious offenders".

I doubt she even knows who I am, however then again if I am on 2 different lists and can't get into the US, I am probably on some sort of no-fly list. I applied for a US visa and was denied, before 9.11 I had gone to Boston, USA twice within a year all with no problem, whilst working for a big International IT company.

You can see my site in the list of "naughty domains" at https://www.wikispooks.com/wiki/PropOrNot. One site on the list, Natural News, is offering $10,000 for the identities of the people behind the Russophobic owners of the PropOrNot.com site, and they asked the Washington Post to retract a story claiming their site was Russian propaganda. 

If you get blocked by a subscription bar and don't want to be tracked or turn BRAVES sheilds down, or turn off ADblocker extensions you can do some simple client-side hackery in the DOM by removing classes on the element ("Open Developer Tools > Select The Element -> Edit it as HTML -> Remove Classes and inline styles until the block is gone and you can read the page).

Citing a report from some group called PropOrNot listing more than 200 web sites that supposedly pushed Russian propaganda routinely to more than 15 million Americans, the Post – without irony – declared that somehow constituted "scientific evidence" of Russian election-tampering!

So not only am I a pawn in the game being played between Russia and NATO/US with cover from other countries willing to break international law when they cannot get a UN resolution to invade a country, I am also part of the Russiagate conspiracy hoax that stopped Hillary Clinton getting into office. 

Well although I am happy to be considered worthy enough to stop a psychotic killer and war-mongering liar get into the Presidency, I didn't do much apart from print the truth back then, something that was written off as Russian disinfo, and could have swayed the election Trumps way but all big social media sites were blocking what we all now know was a real story of corruption e.g the news on Hunter Bidens laptop.

Apparently, despite Russiagate being debunked a hundred and one times, and Clinton officials and lawyers being interviewed and arrested by the FBI for making up false claims, in which fake info based on rumours was given to ex UK spy Christopher Steele, who then compiled a dossier that they then used to "prove" Donald Trump was a Russian agent with a love of prostitutes and pee parties, people still believe this narrative. This is why I have my site to give people the facts other sites don't.

However it has later come out that due to her narcissistic temperament the "Russia did it", claim was literally made up when Hillary Clinton found out she had lost to Trump, someone she actually helped persuade to run for President as she thought she could easily beat him and carry on the Obama administration that helped bring slave markets back to Libya and funnelled guns from there to Syria, and al-Qaeda and ISIS terrorists to try and other throw President Assad.  

This is another site with my domain mentioned multiple times, the backlinks don't work as the people are obviously copying and pasting from other sources, and don't bother putting the http:// in front of my site's name to get you here, but the SEO gains would have been nice seeing I am being shadow banned and articles that used be at the top of Google are slipping down and down the page.

Well, to be honest, I feel honoured to be considered a threat somehow to weak minds, Melissa. It seems I am worthy enough to be on this list along with such evil doers as the Drudge Report, Russia Today, and of course the rabid, evil points of view from Antiwar.com. Plus of course, I get to say I am on a ban list with Alex Jones, one of my first conspiracy heroes back in the day he used to rant and rave at the camera like a loon in need of Largactil LOL.

Sometimes I just feel that if a site is not on a list like the ones I have shown you they are not doing enough to fight the establishment narrative and give people an opposing point of view to consider. Surely if you host a show called Redacted, which I do watch, you should be on a ban list along with me, Alex Jones, Natural News, and RT.com. Come on what does it take for new shows that get more viewers than MSN outlets that dare speak the truth about the Nord Stream pipe bombings to get put on our naughty list?

I also found this list of raw site URLs https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BigMcLargeHuge/opensources/master/sources/sources.csv which had me labelled down for "bias" and "conspiracy". Well I don't know what my bias is, but if it's that I am against a 3rd nuclear war, hate fake current and historical narratives and I'm not a "co-incidence theorist" then yes those labels are correct.

It seems this core list has been copied, and amended in some cases across numerous blogs claiming to have a list of "fake news sites", or "sites to be careful reading", whatever that means. If it's that you might find an alternative and possibly more correct view of an event than those spouted by the mainstream media outlets then yes.

I did find it amusing on the site to find under the category "State Run" just the two sites from the countries the US is currently pushing its propaganda for war with, Russia Today and Iran's Press TV.

What I want to know is where was the BBC? You cannot get a more state run organisation than the BBC, a news broadcaster that has the backing of the government in forcing all live TV viewers to fork out over £150 per year to pay for a licence fee that funds the BBC's reporting.

Therefore it is something I expect, to be labelled a conspiracy theorist just because I don't believe in physics that says an aluminium plane cannot fly at 550mph just inches above the ground and punch it's way through 3 rings of re-enforced concrete as supposedly happened at the Pentagon on 9.11. If I threw an empty can of coke at my bedroom wall would you expect it to just bounce off or go directly through it as if it had been the weight of a rock with some Semtex attached?

Oh and you must call me anti-Semitic for daring report what many US news stations did on the day of 9.11 about the "dancing Israelis", flicking lighters and positioned where no-one else would know to be, filming the first plane hit the Twin Towers. Known Mossad agents who were released by the FBI without charge and went onto an Israeli TV show to claim that they were, "just documenting the event".

And I must be a "hate speech" site for daring to talk about how Israel is assassinating hundreds of Palestinians at the fence that divides them from their old stolen homes. Or how the Mossad stole British passports to use in their assassination of a Hamas leader in Dubai, or show the YouTube video recording of two IDF soldiers shooting 9 bullets into the back of an injured US citizen, Furkan Dogan, on their high seas attack on the Mavi Marmara.

Then of course I must fall into the most evil category at all as well. No-one can point out that Auschwitz itself has decreased the number of people that died within it's rebuilt walls from 6 million down to under a million without being a blatant liar and holocaust denier. I guess the people running the camp, and the historians who have lowered the number from a round perfect 6 million, a number that is stated in the Torah as the number of Jews who must die before they can return to Israel, must fall into the same category as me?

So what do to if these blogs and sites are correct, and my site is on these lists to be considered so dangerous as to warn anyone visiting that it's not a reliable source?

Well what we need is a real "Alternative News" search engine. I did attempt creating one on my old site, I basically just returned Google's results as DuckDuckGo.com does through a proxy server to remove all the trackers, and then I had a list of sites such as the BBC, MSBC, CNN and other "authoritative news sources" that I removed from the results.

However that server is not running anymore and I doubt anyone out there is going to create a real #altnews search engine. I tried creating one using Googles Search Engine tools that used to be at the top of the page but then Google took it down, along with all my ad revenue from them and I am left with nothing.

I can only try my best to use what I can, I am probably on the way out in my 40's but with several chromic severe conditions that have seen me spend a week per month in the local hospital for the last 3 months, and a month stint in August last year and another week in June 2001, all after I took that evil AstraZ jab. I didn't want it but my parents live local and wouldn't even see me unless I took an LFT test and sent them a picture of the result. 

However they were nice enough to give me COVID last month, and whilst in hospital for this months stint (I only got out two days ago), I was in a bay where everyone got COVID and moved. I was the only one that didn't get it probably due to having anti-bodies still in me. 

Still I had to ask for a test despite the whole bay having COVID apart from me. I had to really kick off, go through 3 nurses and a matron and demand one from a doctor just to get a negative result. The new hospital policy says you only get a test if you are showing symptoms well when I had COVID my temp was 34.1C, not exactly steaming, and plus it takes days to show symptoms anyway. 

I just cannot believe last month when I was in hospital they were trialling a new computer system called EPIC where QR codes were scanned before any meds given out and this month they were already calling it an EPIC failure and printing everything out on paper as it was easier to use. 

Hey, what's another £20bn down the drain trying to modernise the NHS and put everything on computer. The last £20bn system was a mess and never used, and this one will be the same. We would have got a better return sending it over to Ukraine for the Russians to blow up on delivery but then that is another post! Go have a read, I have a lot of coverage of the Donbass war on this site, and share it with your friends. 

One of mine thought that the BBC would have told him that the Americans had blown up Nord Stream 1 & 2 pipelines if it were true, but that's what I am here for folks, to tell you the evil dirty truth that many go around all their lives in ignorant bliss. 

What I would do be a dumb sheep again and not know the things I do!

I hate to say this but please donate if you can, I am doing this on my own, without funding and I am on ban lists and no fly lists for taking the time to write these articles.

By Dark Politricks

© 2020 Dark Politricks

The TerrorStorm Documentary - False Flag Attacks

The TerrorStorm Documentary - False Flag Attacks

By Dark Politricks

This is the 2nd edition of the popular Alex Jones documentary TerrorStorm that looks in detail at the proven history of false flag events and state sponsored terrorism including modern false flag attacks such as the 7/7 London bombings and 9/11.

For anyone who doesn't believe these two recent terror events were false flag attacks carried out by government intelligence agencies. Either deliberately "or allowed to happen" to further the case for our current decade of war, the loss of liberties at home, an increase in state surveillance and the rise of a modern high-tech police state, you just need to read up on the following proven events.

The Lavon Affair - an Israeli false flag attack in the 50's that aimed to attack US and British targets in Egypt so that they could be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood and keep British troops in control of the Suez canal. This is a proven false flag operation that led to the resignation of Israeli defence minister Pinhas Lavon and is admitted as such by Israel.

The Gulf of Tonkin attack - the "non event" that was used as a pretext by the US government under President Lyndon B. Johnson to start the Vietnam war. This attack has now been admitted to have never occurred however it was reported as a North Vietnamese attack on US ships and used to justify the war.

Operation AJAX - the reason the Iranians still call us the "Great Satan". The democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh was other thrown by a combination of US and British intelligence operations that were used to keep control of the oil fields that had been nationalised by Mosaddegh.

After the coup the western powers installed a puppet Shah which ruled over the country ruthlessly until the Islamic revolution in 1979.

And for more recent events one must only look at the revelations from Seymour Hersh that Dick Cheney planned to stage a false flag attack in the Strait of Hormuz by staging a shoot up between US ships and more US boats painted as Iranian boats.

We also have the Iraq war and the numerous propaganda stunts (both real and planned) that drove us into this unpopular and unnecessary war.

Not only was the 9.11 commission used to justify the war with witnesses such as Laurie Mylroie claiming Saddam Hussien was behind every major terrorist attack in recent years but we had the "dodgy dossier" that was full of exaggerated claims that the Iraqi army could attack British forces with Weapons of Mass Destruction within 45 minutes and the sad spectacle of the once respected US Secretary of State Colin Powell lying to the UN about the certainty of the existence of Iraqi WMD.

The propaganda was used to scare people into a war they didn't want and as we know now couldn't afford. Yet even though millions of people marched against going to battle for oil the axis of war pushed on. Even Tony Blair and George Bush discussed staging a false flag attack to get their desired war in Iraq by tempting Saddam Hussein to shoot down a UN plane flying over his country.

So not only have false flag attacks been used many times in the past they have been discussed very recently even if you don't believe 9.11 or 7/7 were such events.

Whatever you think of Alex Jones the documentary is well worth watching and I have no reason to believe someone could "act" 24/7 as a government stooge by letting people have "controlled government information" as many claim Alex and other alternative news personalities do. Sometimes you have to realise that if you go too far down the rabbit hole everyone starts looking like a rabbit!

To those that claim he blatantly ignores Israel and the Jewish angle during his conspiracy theorising I would say his wife maybe Jewish but then so what? During the film he talks about the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty during the 1967 war and how Israel deliberately attacked and murdered US Navy troops during a false flag attack designed to draw the USA into the conflict.

As witnesses from the ship were ordered on pain of death or imprisonment to stay silent, and twice aircraft sent to help the USS Liberty were called back by Lyndon Johnson who apparently claimed "I want that boat to sink!", it is left to those survivors brave enough to speak out years later to tell the truth about this false flag attack from a supposed ally.

Not only was the US flag flying high and visible to the Israeli pilots that flew over the ship in the hours before the attack. It still flew during the torpedoing and the strafing of the survivors in the water by Israeli boats sent to ensure that no witnesses were left to tell their side of the story. Radio's were jammed to prevent calls for help and everything was done to ensure that the boat sank as the US President wished.

However an Israeli pilot has gone on record to claim he told his superiors that the ship was clearly American but was threatened with court martial for not attacking it. He refused and was arrested when he returned to base.

Also US radio monitors in the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon heard the pilots protests and they have been confirmed by then U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon Dwight Porter. As well as this an Israeli Major claimed that everyone in the war room at the time knew they were attacking a US ship. He had heard the pilots statement about the ship being American but he re-canted this statement after being threatened.

This false flag attack was obviously an attempt to bring the US into the war by blaming the attack on Egypt and it was only stopped due to the appearance of a Russian boat that halted the Israeli attack and prevented the plan from succeeding.

This is not exactly sticking up for Israel as many claim Alex Jones does and he could have easily skipped this event from his list of historical attacks. There have been so many false flag attacks throughout history he didn't need to mention Israel and the USS Liberty at all. However he didn't ignore it and even if he had it doesn't matter.

What does matter is that people are made aware of the use of false flag attacks throughout history and how they are still taught at military schools and used to this day by those needing an excuse to go to war.

We just need to think about this when the next bombing or chemical weapon attack is blamed on Iran or Syria and used as a pretext to get us into another war. Watch the film if you haven't seen it already and pass it on. If you want to download a copy from youtube.com then read this article on how to go about it.



You can view the original article False Flag Attacks - TerrorStorm on the main site www.darkpolitricks.com.

Howard Stern- Alex Jones Interview 02/26/13

Howard Stern- Alex Jones Interview 02/26/13

By Dark Politricks

youtube.com


Alex Jones calls in to the Howard Stern show to talk to him about all of the following:

• The real story between juice boxes making your kids gay and shrimp committing suicide.
• Why gun control might be ideal in a perfect world but that we don't live in one.
• Why the war on terror is a ruse for the American government to bring in measures such as the TSA groping, drones over the USA and the NDAA.
• When bin-Laden really died and why they killed the Seal Team who attacked the compound in Abbottabad.
• The Georgia Guidestones and what they mean.
• Population reduction and how they are planning on doing it with vaccines and soft kill methods.
• How in the future the elites won't need 7 billion people and how MIT are already planning the robots to take over the means of production for the "wealth creators".
• Vacccinations and why he hasn't let his kids have one.
• Why is it that McDonalds hamburgers can sit on a shelf for a year and still be eaten.
• His relationship with Charlie Sheen and why Glenn Beck threatened to ruin his career.
• The interview with Piers Morgan and why his "spidey sense" told him to get out of New York after seeing shit stained toilets in the CNN building.

He also talks about his past and his family including:

• How he lost his virginity at the age of 12.
• How he is happily married to a Jewish woman and doesn't put his success down to being an "Israeli Mossad Disinfo Agent".
• How he is interested in spirituality but see's all organised religion as BS.
• Why he home schools his children and why he thinks home schooling is growing in the USA.
• How he played sport as well as did drugs at school - and he inhaled!
• Why he loves history and went into talk radio as he hated hearing the USA being put down in Community College classes.
• Who he respects in the industry and who his top hated people are.

This is a good interview that doesn't put Alex Jones in a bad light.

It also might hopefully might wake a few people up to what is going on in the world.

Remember to fact check everything he says on the show for yourself as it is very easy to take something out of context.

Also you won't find any ranting and raving in this interview and personally I think Alex comes off well - especially after the criticism I gave him for losing his cool on the Piers Morgan show.

In fact after all the years of listening to him it is one of the first I have heard him have a laugh and joke and show a sense of humour. It must be the fact he was speaking to Howard Stern and not Piers Morgan that did it!


View the original article Alex Jones speaks to Howard Stern about his life, drugs, sex and population control on the main site at www.darkpolitricks.com

Alex Jones Please Calm Down So Your Points Get Across

Alex Jones Please Calm Down So Your Points Get Across

By Dark Politricks

After last weeks battle on prime time TV between Piers Morgan and Alex Jones  it has become a major talking point. It was a heated debate (on one side at least) that has been re-shown, mocked and repeated everywhere from blogs and news programs to satire shows like the Daily Show and beyond.

The question being asked is - did Alex Jones do more harm than good by going off on one of his manic rants at Piers Morgan?

Did he attempt his usual tactic of trying to claim to have facts on everything from A to Z. Far too many facts to explain in such a short period of time on TV, therefore the viewers probably didn't take many if any of  them in at all. All they went away with after the interview is the perception that Alex Jones was crazy for going off on one on Piers who remained calm throughout the interview.

Even worse - did he make Piers Morgan, a liar who's testimony at the Leveson Inquiry about Press Standards and phone hacking has been called "utterly unpersuasive." by the Judge himself seem like an honest, sensible and well balanced person?

I used to listen to the Alex Jones radio show over the web and on pod-casts until I got so fed up with hearing the same adverts about survival food stocks over and over again that it just became a pointless exercise in hurting my ears with advertising.

I have seen the rants, I have seen the madness but I have also read some of the articles, the history and the evidence he constantly claims to have to back up his sometimes "heated" debates. He is not always right and he is most definitely not always wrong. People need to look past any first impressions and research for themselves anything he says.

No one should make up your own mind but yourself.

That means not Alex, not Piers or anyone else on the mainstream media but yourself after reading a balanced view of history. Keeping in mind that history is usually written by the winners and that conspiracies do and continue to exist and have done since the beginning of time.

If only Alex could practise some form of Yoga or meditation to calm himself down before going on the mainstream media he would pass himself over a lot better.

It is not good to be ripped apart on satire shows as he was on the recent Daily Show where he was being portrayed as just a right wing crazy nut job who thinks Obama is the new Hitler ready to come for your guns.

The problem with Alex Jones and his argument over gun control is two fold.

1. He does actually have facts and evidence coming out of his behind. The problem is, whether you believe them or not he does not put them over in such a way that people will catch everything he says.

He would have done much better during the interview with Piers Morgan to stick to the single salient point that the UK, a country where the population has no guns, does actually have a higher violent crime rate than the USA a country filled to the brim with guns.

This was proven in a recent study published today that said:

Britain has a higher crime rate than any other rich nation except Australia, according to a survey yesterday and the chances of having your car stolen are greater in England and Wales than anywhere else in the developed world.

According to the figures released in the report yesterday, 3.6 per cent of the population of England and Wales were victims of violent crime in 1999 - second only to Australia, where the figure was 4.1 per cent. However in the USA only 2 per cent of the population suffered an assault or robbery.

Also one out of every 40 people in England and Wales had their cars stolen in 1999, the highest rate in the 17 developed countries examined.

2. He needs to chill out before going on TV so that he cannot later be portrayed as crazy loon later on. When you are being shown in clips along with FOX TV presenters, Republican Tea Baggers and nutters who believe everything they see on TV without reading both sides first and coming up with their own opinions then you have lost the argument before you have even opened your mouth.

Take a valium, no in fact take a 100. Just do what you have to do so that you don't explode in anger and declare another war of independence like you did with Piers on CNN.

It is comments like that shouted in anger that will be shown over and over again on YouTube and MSM shows to repeatedly claim you are nothing more than a nutter no matter how much substance your argument has.

Whether you are on either side of the gun control argument you should read up about the facts first before making your OWN minds up.

And if you are going on TV - just take a chill pill first and don't overload the audience with facts.

Stick to one or two proven facts and debate them calmly and honestly. Then you can walk away knowing that you won't be derided from state to state for just being the bloke who wants to deport the known liar and phone hacker Piers Morgan and start a new revolution.

The interview between Alex Jones and Piers Morgan can be watched below.



View the original aticle on Alex Jones needing to calm down on the main site ww.darkpolitricks.com

Piers Morgan interviews Alex Jones over gun control

Piers Morgan interviews Alex Jones over gun control

By Dark Politricks

The CNN presenter Piers Morgan interviews radio host and liberty lover Alex Jones after his moves to get the British TV personality deported after his remarks on the 2nd amendment.

The comments came after Piers made comments on his show and on Twitter about introducing tougher gun control after the Sandy Hook school massacre which saw 20 children and 6 teachers die in another school rampage that once again split America down the middle between defenders of the constitution and the 2nd amendment and those who want to see tougher gun control regulations introduced.

The massacre saw 20 year old Adam Lanza use a variety of semi automatic weapons including the Bushmaster XM-15 rifle a 10mm Glock 20 SF handgun and a 9mm SIG Sauer handgun to kill his mother before entering the Sandy Hook Elementary School and killing pupils and staff before committing suicide.

This recent attack was the most deadliest school massacre after the 2007 Viginia Tech Massacre which saw 23 year old Seung-Hui Cho shoot and kill 32 people and injure 17 others.

On a side note, I know Americans are petitioning to have Piers Morgan deported but over here in the UK we really, really don't want him back so please send him somewhere else if you have to!

The interview debate between Alex Jones and Piers Morgan is below.




View the original article on Piers Morgan interviewing Alex Jones at www.darkpolitricks.com.