The Democratic Meltdown

Democrats Cry Foul In Hypocrisy Ridden Hysteria

By Dark Politricks

It's so funny to see hypocritical Democrats go mad over Trump, Elon Musk, and DOGE.

Did anyone really think Biden was running the country in his state or were his super rich Democratic backers and lying intelligence community really pulling the strings?

What has Trump really done to make so many Democrats act so scared?

He is trying to solve the huge debt crisis Biden left the US in by printing trillions of dollars, causing massive inflation, and dishing money out to crazy causes which DOGE is finding out about and stopping.

The USA's debt to GDP ratio is unsustainable.

They are paying nearly $2 trillion a year in interest on their $36+ trillion debt.

As you can see from this graph, the debt jumped under Biden and the money was wasted.

It was given away to other countries for war, NGOs, and DEI projects.

Biden made women's spaces like changing rooms unsafe.

He made women's sports unfair by letting men compete against them.

Plus the US military and schools have become places of indoctrination and humour. People are joining the military just to get free transgender operations. Knowing they will never be deployed or even have to complete basic training.

Schools have been exposed as places LGBT teachers push their ideology and kinks onto students.

Videos have emerged of primary teachers pretending to be cats and getting their students to purr at them.

This is the sort of thing Elon Musk and DOGE have stopped. Millions of dollars being spent on teaching Afghanistan's about the evils of early conceptual Art. As the commentator says in the video, "I am sure Afghani Wives have more important things to worry about", and I am sure that is true.

China must be laughing at the state of the US military due to Biden's policies.

All this printed money was wasted and rather than helping Americans, given away to foreign countries and nefarious deeds.

Why did FEMA run out of money when hurricane Helene hit North Carolina?

If the government can print all that money it could have used some of it to help those affected by towns literally washed away.

Instead the rescue and clean up was left to private citizens. FEMA spent that money to pay for illegal and criminal migrants to have hotel rooms, phones, and debit cards, plus crime has soared under Biden's Presidency.

Democrats are crying about Elon Musk being close to Trump and finding and stopping money being wasted, why?

Presidents can put anyone they want into their cabinet and rich powerful people have always held the strings of power in the USA. At least he is public facing and not hiding behind the scenes like super rich Democratic string pullers.

USAID has been found out as a front for NGOs and the CIA to cause havoc in other countries trying to overthrow them.

It was also used to fund news outlets like Politico who has spent a decade attacking Trump, Reuters, and even the BBC.

Worst of all we have found out USAID even funded the gain of research experiments in Wuhan that caused COVID.

The CIA has now come out and said they always knew that the virus came from a Wuhan lab leak.

Strange, it took a massive popular mandate by the voting public who wanted to clean up America and MAHA for the CIA to come clean.

People didn't just vote for Trump, they voted for ex Democrats Tulsi Gabbard and RFK JNR, plus Elon Musk and Pam Bondi to help solve the problems Democrats have left America in.

Plus whatever Trump does to GAZA, Biden's administration will always be remembered for helping Israel's Genocide there as well as helping destroy Ukraine.

From the Maiden coup under Obama and Biden as his VP, to all the biolabs and money laundering that Ukraine was used for.

As Elon said, why are so many US politicians multi millionaires when their salaries should not allow that?

As President Truman said decades ago

"Show me a rich politician and I'll show you a crook".

People really need to look at how the Democrats crying about Trumps nominations are taking huge amounts of money from Big Pharma and the MIC to stop them.

The Democrats are being hypocritical by accusing Trump of things Biden did and their media is so biased it finds little things taken out of context to cry about constantly on their news channels like MSNBC.

The USA doesn't need to be spending money abroad on Transgender Operas, or classes in foreign schools to promote their leftist ideas  when it's border crisis has caused massive problems in their cities.

He has put troops on the border, and made Mexico and Canada to do the same to stop Narco Terrorists, and all that fentanyl coming across the border unstopped.

Plus the USA has the biggest child trafficking problem in the world. 

I bet many Democrats crying about Trump's nominees are also within Epstein's black book, Trump and Pam Bondi, is promising to release the names inside.

It will be very interesting to see whose names are in there.

By Dark Politricks

© 2025 - Dark Politricks

Video's About The Joe Biden Scandal The MSM Is Ignoring

Should You Vote For Joe Biden?

 

By Dark Politricks

 

Out of many, I have managed to pick two good short videos that I believe anyone thinking of voting for Joe Biden should at least spend 15 minutes to watch before going and voting for "more of the same". The 1st refers to the scandal that the Democrats don't want you to know about. They even have Silicon Valley helping them by hiding this news from Facebook, Twitter and YouTube where most modern people get their news from.

Even if you don't like Trump, an idiot President if ever, if these revelations about Biden plus all his past political acts such as enacting the 1994 Crime Act. Imprisoning poor people for 99 times the length of time for possession of crack than cocaine powder, something his son clearly has gotten away with, and for helping create the privatized prison industry, you should still know the type of person you are voting for.

I know it's hard to pick from two senile, potentially seriously ill, Grandads who can't even remember what they are saying during speeches, or even have a civil debate, but you should at least familiarise yourself with the choice of those who control whoever is President before voting for them.

Not to ignore the fact that Joe Biden lied about getting 3 degrees in the highest section of his class from some University or that he lied about walking in the streets for the Civil Rights movement. Or the fact that he is taking money from the MIC, Big Oil, refuses to ban Fracking, helped Obama cage kids at the border with ICE and denied in the last debate his support for the "New Green Deal", just after claiming that "It would pay for itself".

Just imagine if this news story was reversed, and it was Trump's son's laptop that had been found and handed to a Democrat. Revealing not only that Trump's son was doing the same drugs that his Dad helped craft a law that locked millions of poor black people up, as well as sleeping with prostitutes, but was peddling influence to his Vice President Dad from foreign Energy Firms, and even worse the Chinese Communist Party. 

 

The drugs and prostitutes are not really important to me considering Presidents from Clinton, Bush to Obama all took drugs, but the hypocrisy is. I would love to have seen Hunter Biden get caught with a bag of rocks and see how many hoops his father would have jumped through to stop his own Crime Bill punishing him by locking him up for dozens of years.

 

The laptop is full of evidence the FBI should have been looking through to find out exactly what influence was "peddled", how compromised was Joe Biden, and certainly investigate any penetration of the US political system by the Chinese Communist Party.

How would the Democrats react. The news would be full of the story, Trump's campaign would be finished. Instead all the MSM are calling it - yes - "A Russian Disinfo Campaign" - a story that never gets old.

I like this video from Bitchute.com as it's succinct and reflects my views on the situation. I really don't care about Hunter's dalliances with drugs and prostitutes apart from the fact his Dad knew he has a drug problem and would have probably used all his influence to get his son out of a jam if caught by the Police. He certainly wouldn't let him spend a minimum of 5 years as his own bill stated for possession of a single crack rock,

Obama may have introduced "The Fair Sentencing Act of 2010" that "reduces the disparity between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to trigger certain federal criminal penalties from a 100:1 weight ratio to an 18:1 weight ratio...", however there is still a disparity that means someone, usually richer white people who use cocaine powder, get 18 times less jail time for a gram of cocaine powder than someone else would get for a gram of rock.

I still think Joe Biden, like Hillary if she had been elected, will probably lead us into a war with Iran and maybe crank up tensions with Russia. He is definitely part of the deep state owned and controlled politicians, that they want in power looking like a senile Grandpa, and allowing them to do all the things the MIC and the Halliburton's of the world want. Such as turning countries like Libya into failed states or using Jihadists to destabilise nations like Syria. All so they can make money by first bombing the country to pieces and then by rebuilding it.

If he wasn't the "choice" / "selection" of the deep state, then this news story would certainly be all over the mainstream news and not banned from various social media sites. It just shows how much power they control when they can label a serious news story like this a "Russian Dis-info Campaign", or laugh about it and wave it away with a stroke of a hand on a news show as if not even worthy of looking into.

Whether you want to vote for Joe Biden, a proven liar, or Trump a proven liar, is up to you. However you should at least know the sort of lies that Joe has been peddling if you don't already. 

 

The 2nd video by comedian Jimmy Dore, who debunked the "Russiagate" story in real time, along with fake Syrian gas attacks and other stories pushed by the COINTELPRO owned MSM who still push CIA propaganda through TV News as they did during the Cold War with Operation Mockingbird, or more recently the Iraq and Afghanistan war where there seemed to be a retired general or intelligence member on any panel discussing how many bombs they should continue to drop. It is well worth a watch if you want to know a bit more about his political career, and the lies he has told during it.

The New Hunter Biden Laptop Scandal Allegations are Completely Insane

Watch on Bitchute.com.

Jimmy Dore debunks Rolling Stone Lies To It's Readers

 

Watch on YouTube.com.

 

Also if you ever notice this site suddenly disappear then check out Archive.Today or the Wayback Machine, although the person in the 1st video did say they were even removing political content from their archives at web.archive.org which is not a good sign for the Internet, at the moment you can get a good coverage of my articles going back to 2009.

Please comment and pass this on to anyone unaware of the hypocrisy of Joe Biden and the potential security threat he could pose due to the discovery of his son's laptop.

 

By Dark Politricks

© 2020 By Dark Politricks

Nancy Pelosi Says She Would “Close Ther Government Forever” Rather Than Fund Trump’s Wall

Nancy Pelosi Says She Would “Close Ther Government Forever” Rather Than Fund Trump’s Wall

By Dark Politricks

Now the Democrats have control of the Congress and the Republicans the Senate, and Trump and Russia (supposedly), the White House, there is going to be a lot of gridlock in DC for the foreseeable future.

The Democrats have the power to impeach Trump who threatened only the other day that any attempt to do could cause a revolution.

Donald Trump wants to build a massive wall just like the Chinese did thousands of years ago to keep out the Mexicans and other migrants. I expect he will want to bury the dead bodies of those who worked building the wall inside it as well. 

How he doesn't expect people to just build tunnels under it like they do in Gaza to Egypt or how El Chappo escaped from 2 Mexican prisons I don't know, but he thinks a wall is the answer to all his migration problems despite more people leaving the US now than arriving.

This is the article from Steve Watson at Prison Planet.com

Addressing the media Thursday, Nancy Pelosi vowed that she will not negotiate border wall funding and would rather keep the government closed forever.

Pelosi told the media that she is confident that President Trump will eventually sign a bill excluding his requested border wall funding “because does he want to have government closed forever?”




“I mean, what’s this about? I know he doesn’t believe in government, I know that he doesn’t know that much about what is at risk to shut it down, but I think that it would be — and let’s not talk about what might happen,” Pelosi said.

“Let’s talk about what we can do right now to keep government open. There is strong bipartisan support to do that. The only obstacle is the president of the United States.” She added.

Congress has to pass an appropriations bill to fund the government before the end of the year, otherwise there will be a partial government shutdown.

Trump said earlier in the week that he would be proud to shut down the government for border security, insisting that Democrats fund the wall.

TRUMP to SCHUMER: "I am proud to shut down the government for border security, chuck. People in this country don't want criminals and people that have lots of problems and drugs pouring into our country" pic.twitter.com/E8CRW9k7pe

— Saagar Enjeti (@esaagar) December 11, 2018

The President also released a video Thursday, slamming the hypocrite Democrats, who previously supported strong borders, saying that they are only now opposing border wall funding to oppose his presidency.

Lets not do a shutdown, Democrats – do whats right for the American People! pic.twitter.com/bZg07ZKQqo

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 13, 2018

The Democrats are absolute hypocrites. All along they've been supporting walls, and supporting fences and supporting all sorts of border security, Trump said, before airing clips of Chuck Schumer, Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama pledging to crack down on illegal immigration.

The fact is they've always supported fences, and walls and partitions, but you know what? They only don't want to do it because of me. They have to put the people ahead of politics, Trump added.

Earlier this week, Border Patrol Union Vice President Art Del Cueto slammed Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer for their actions at the White House meeting.

“Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, they can come down here and help us patrol the border and Ill show them how difficult and how dangerous it really is, and how that wall makes a difference.” Del Cueto said.

Do you believe in conspiracy theories?

Do you believe in conspiracy theories?

By Dark Politricks

Conspiracy theorists have a bad name for themselves. It's used as a slur word to imply someone who believes in far fetched theories and who no matter how many facts and pieces of evidence you place in front of them will always choose to believe in a theory that involves hidden plotters and is made up of interconnected threads that need piecing together to see the true picture.

The truth of the matter is that conspiracies happen all the time and the courts in the UK and USA are full of people involved on charges involving conspiracy, hey even I was up on a conspiracy charges at the age of 18 with 8 other people. 

So the word conspiracy just means a crime where two or more people collude together to commit a criminal act.

People trying to debunk conspiracy theories often use Occam's razor which broken down to its simplest form means "the simplest theory is the most preferable". However this obviously ignores the basic fact that if clever people especially those with instruments of power within their control wish to collude to commit crimes they will rarely get caught because they will be clever enough to make the evidence point to others through the use of plants, patsy's and propaganda.

Therefore a policeman investigating a crime committed by such conspirators and using Occam's razor to deduce who committed the act would follow the breadcrumbs left by the real conspirators up to the patsy they wish to have the crime point to. If you are not wanting to go to prison for the crime yourself then you need to have the evidence point towards someone else, a smoking gun, preferably in the hand of a lone gunman with a grievance against the victim.

Therefore when dealing with possible high crimes and misdemeanors that have been carried out by conspirators we must do more than look at the obvious suspect as we must always think that anyone clever enough to commit a crime such as assassinate a president or start a war based on mass murder will want us to stop at the shoo in suspect and go no further.

One of the most famous example of a crime that most people believe involved a conspiracy is the Kennedy assassination. Numerous polls over the years have shown that the majority of Americans believe that Lee Harvey Oswold was not the lone gunman and that the assassination was part of a larger conspiracy and cover up.  A FOX news poll found 66% of Americans believed this, which followed multiple polls over the years all with similar percentages.

One of the major factors in whether you believe in a conspiracy or not is whether you have actually spent any time investigating the matter yourself. If all you heard about the Kennedy assassination was the main stream news about the Warren Commissions findings and the establishments belief in Oswald's guilt then you have no reason to doubt the official story.

If however you know about the later Congress investigation into his death, that concluded there was probably a conspiracy, you know different. They concluded that shots were fired from the Grassy Knoll on top of knowledge that evidence against Oswald was falsified including his confession call to the Russian embassy in Mexico, the tampering of physical evidence including the wounds on the Presidents body to hide evidence of frontal shots, as well as death bed confessions by suspected conspirators. If you know about all this then you might have come to a different conclusion.

However on the flip side one of the problems that tarnishes the image of people investigating conspiracies is those people that ignore facts and, evidence and engage in wild speculation.

Remember that it only takes one wild theory to tar a whole movement with the same brush. This is what I feel has happened with the 9/11 conspiracy movement. There are so many unanswered questions, suspect actions and coincidences on that fateful day that it warrants proper investigation however talk of no planes hitting the Twin Towers and Lasers from space will have made many people just skip investigating this major crime altogether which is a shame.

Another issue is that people are very unwilling to believe that their government could possibly do their citizens harm and faced with any choice that involves admitting that the people in power could possibly not have their best interests at heart will dismiss out of hand anything to the contrary.

This is obviously a major mistake as there is so much evidence of governments lying, stealing, cheating and murdering their populaces over the centuries that it beggars belief that anyone who has studied history would not know of at least a handful of cases of their own countries government being involved in some dark behaviour in the last 50 years.

However this is another problem in that certain people just don't want to find out about such crimes even when the evidence is handed to them on a plate.

They would rather push any such thoughts to the back of their minds and carry on their lives in ignorance believing what their government spoon feeds them through the media and filling their lives up with inconsequential activities.

I would guess that a very large percentage of people who believe in crimes committed by governmental agencies or "conspiracy theories" started out as skeptics who just had a thirst for knowledge and enjoyed reading and looking back at history, I know that I did. If someone had suggested that my own government would be capable of lying to the public to start wars or even killing its own population and blaming it on the countries supposed enemies 10 years ago I would have laughed in their face.

However I was one of those kids at school that always asked "why" which the teachers hated and wouldn't always take the answer I was given as fact. I spent time into looking why and found answers that led me to more questions and so on. Once you find evidence of government crimes in one case it leads you to investigate others and before long any previously held outlook about the world is soon washed away with examples of powerful groups of men looking out for their own.

This trip down history helps understand current and future events in a new light. However it can also send some people over the edge and into a state where everything isn't what it seems and has to have ulterior motives or a conspiracy behind it. Whilst a healthy skepticism of the official story and government is good entering a state where black becomes white and any theory apart from the official one must be believed is not good for anyone.

Conspiracies that would have to involve thousands of people are going to be very hard to keep quiet. However they have occurred throughout history, the Manhattan project to build the first nuclear bomb is one instance where thousands of people worked on a mission unknown to the citizens of the USA. It was only when the bomb was dropped did the extend of the "conspiracy" to create a nuke was revealed along with the secret cities and factories that people and scientists worked at plus all the time and money spent on the secret. This is one instance where lots of people kept quiet and the project was kept secret long enough without leaks to anyone apart from the Soviets.

Whisle-blowers and government leaks happen all the time and even though threat of death maybe enough to keep some people quiet the public spot light and glare of the mass media is very good at keeping people alive. Just because certain questions remain unanswered about events does not mean that the answer lies in alternate theories that themselves have no supporting evidence or facts to back them up.

I will give an example of the moon landings. There  are many people who believe the moon landings were faked due to photographic inconsistencies, radiation belts and supposed technical limitations of the time period. However these people seem to forget that thousands of people around the world followed the Apollo mission to the Moon by their own telescopes.

A conspiracy like this would have involved hundreds if not thousands of people and kept up for years on end. Where are the death bed confessions of people who were involved trying to absolve themselves of the guilt of the lie before dying. Why didn't the Russians who were watching the Americans closely at the time not try to prove to the world the landings were faked. I admit that there are some odd aspects to the landings such as who was controlling the camera that filmed the lunar module as it took off from the moon to go home? The camera pans upward as the module lifts off the surface which suggests someone was controlling the camera. If everyone was on board the module then who was filming them?

Even though this question sticks in my head as requiring an answer it does not mean that the moon landings were faked. At most it could mean that the footage of the landings were faked maybe because the footage taken on the moon was off such poor quality, or would be destroyed by radiation on the trip back to earth that they needed a backup for propaganda purposes. However I have no proof of this just an unanswered question that needs answering.

Therefore for those people who look into conspiracies and always ask questions of their government no matter how much a story is being force fed to the public I say fair play but just keep an open mind to the possibility that not everything is a conspiracy and don't be afraid to go where the facts and evidence takes you even if that means it disproves a theory or two.

For those who like to slag off conspiracy theorists as loonies or traitors I would say do some research of your own before making assumptions especially when your government is involved.

Where there is plenty of evidence of past crimes being committed by a perpetrator this usually weighs against them in a court of law as it shows a pattern of behaviour therefore please read up on Operation Northwoods, USS Liberty, Gulf of Tonkin, The Reichstag Fire, The Iraq war dossier, MKUltra, Operation Mockingbird, Operation Gladio, CIA drug smuggling and Iran Contras, the history of Al-quaeda, Sibel Edmonds and the deep state, Venice Airport drug smuggling, CIA and Yemen Visa scam and much much more before jumping to conclusions yourself.

If you are at a loss as to where to start then take a look on this site as there are plenty of articles to get you on your way.


By Dark Politricks

©2018 Dark Politricks

What I believe in.....

Do You Want To Really Know What I Believe In?

By Dark Politricks

This article is for people who want to know what I personally believe in as some articles which contain videos or references to other sites maybe to Left Wing OR Right Wing Sites depending on the news I am writing bout. This article should give you a good taste of where I personally stand on the political spectrum.

1. I believe we need a government however the size of it and the powers it can exert are very much up for debate. I think the COIVD pandemic has led to the UK Government where I live becoming more like the USA in that they have used a tragedy just like the US did with 9.11, to implement a surveillance state, and put laws on the books that won't be removed such as the COVID law that was only supposed to stay on the statute for 2 years but has already been extended. 

COVID has been a perfect excuse for the billionaire class to get even richer, many having invested in Big Pharma companies that went onto make vaccines just before the outbreak. Now that may sound like a conspiracy theory but it's true, just like the fact they ran a war game called "Dark Winter" just a year before the pandemic of what would happen in a virus outbreak, how it would spread quickly worldwide and how the people would react and how governments would control them with lockdowns.

That and the Police bill gives them too much power to monitor us, hack into our computers and TVs and enter our houses without warrants plus ban protests against the bill, and any protest the bill deems too "loud" they can stop under new laws. 

As the Independent says "MPs have voted for “draconian” protest laws in spite of mounting warnings over human rights and questions over whether police want or need the powers. A bill backed by the House of Commons would allow police to impose restrictions on protests based on noise and ban demonstrations by a single person.

They have also passed laws which let them lock people up who expose the UK Governments misdeeds and own war crimes. This really puts shackles around journalists and bloggers like myself that report on the UK surveillance state and intelligence agencies and their devious tricks such as the BBC and Reuters joint operation with MI6 to pay bloggers and YouTubers to spread NATO propaganda into the Russian sphere of influence, something we keep accessing Russia of doing to us, but that in fact we are doing to them 100 times over. 

They buy a few Facebook adverts and the Americans accuse them of fixing the US election in 2016, because Trump beat the chicken hawk, neo-liberal, war-mongerer and one of the most hated politicians in US history, Hillary Clinton. Someone who had already cheated and abused the DNC rules to beat her opponent Bernie Sanders to claim the Democratic nomination. 

Of course her loss in the election could not be down to anything she had done such as lie about events such as being shot at during the Serbian Kosovo war when she visited, or her links with multiple strange deaths, and how she managed to get away with having her own personal Email Servers setup with sensitive information on them which were hacked by WikiLeaks and spread e.g the Podesta Emails and the Anthony Weiner sex crime emails. 

No she had to blame someone and despite the fact Trump put even more sanctions on Russia, accused them of crimes they had not committed and pulled out of missile defence treaties that been set in stone for decades to decrease nuclear missile sizes in both countries, and stop the development of certain weapons. All that would seem to suggest he wasn't in Putin's pocket at all. Their #Russiagate claims have already been proven totally baseless and there has been no apologies by conspiracy theorists on MSM like Rachel Maddow on MNSBC.

He had to be a "Russian Puppet", despite the #Russiagate claims being proven false, and an impeachment trial where there was insufficient evidence to actually convict him of anything, and although he may have borrowed money from Russian banks, he was not in any way a Russian Hand at the wheel of Statehood as Mrs Clinton claimed. She claimed they used social media to hypnotise the American people into voting against her when in fact only a few thousand pounds were spent on pretty innocuous Facebook adverts.

2. I believe laws need to be made with the good of the people as the primary concern not the benefit of vested interests. You only have to look at the USA and how rich some of the politicians are like Nancy Pelosi who has made over $200,000,000 since becoming speaker of the House due to insider trading, or rather passing on to her husband which companies would be getting expensive Government contracts that would boost their share price before any news was released about it.

AIPAC literally forces potential Congress people to sign a form saying they would always vote in favour of Israel in any situation and for those that do sign they get lots of fund raising money and those that don't are smeared and labelled anti-Semitic. Cynthia McCarthy found this out the hard way

3. I believe lobbyists have too much power and influence over our political system. We need to reform our governing system so that politicians truly do represent the people and not the next vested interest hoping to buy a vote. Strict term limits should be implemented at each level of government so that career politicians cannot get comfy and there should be more referendums to allow knowledgeable citizens to take part in the decision making process. 

4. I believe we require major election campaign reform that would enable new parties to run for office to break the 3 party monopoly here in the UK and 2 party system in the USA. The amount of money available would be staggered so that the more support the party gains the more finance they receive. This would stop large amounts of money being wasted on niche parties with little support as well helping larger parties fighting lots of seats. This would also encourage new political ideas to hopefully flourish into new parties and break the control of the existing centre ground parties that only provide an illusion of choice.

5. I believe specific taxes should be spent purely on the items they are taxing keeping to the original idea that brought the tax into being. For example road tax should be spent purely on the upkeep of the roads. Petrol duty should be spent on public transport to make it cheaper and more effective and duties on tobacco and alcohol should be spent purely on the health service. People would be much more likely to accept paying a tax when they can see where the money goes and it would also prevent the government from using money from one tax on other projects.

6. I believe in market economies but I am not an Austrian economist who believes the market knows best in all cases. Examples being Monopoly laws, certain employment law and some health & safety regulations. Without government intervention in these matters we would be working for less money, longer hours and in less safe conditions just like they still do in China, Bangladesh, India and other parts of the world. The market does not always deliver the right solution and without laws to protect the rights we have fought for over the centuries they would easily disappear in this global economy where there is always someone willing to work longer hours for less money. Just because there is a market in child pornography does not mean that it should be allowed.

7. I believe in total freedom of speech and expression as well as an Internet devoid of Government spying. We are living in the last days of an idealistic time on the net and everyday comes more news of the powers that be wanting to exert control over what sites we can visit and new ideas on how to log our every move or take away our ability to surf at will. A government should only be able to monitor a persons activity on the Internet with reasonable grounds for suspicion and a signed warrant they should not be allowed to trawl the web in the hope of uncovering someone doing something wrong

8. I believe that the UK government spends too much time kissing America's arse and we should always be acting in our own self interest rather than going along with the USA's merry wars of aggression because we want to be their best buddy. We need to repeal our unfair and unbalanced extradition treaty and ensure cases like that of Gary McKinnon never come to pass again. We need to stop any CIA plane landing at Heathrow or any other airport on its way to Egypt or Uzbekistan to drop off more renditioned prisoners to be tortured and put anyone inboard into jail for a very long time. We need to prevent any more prime ministers going to the US congress and making embarrassing speeches professing our special and unending friendship and instead realise that modern America has taken our place as the next great Empire and speak out against its high crimes and misdemeanours.

9. I believe we are fighting a phony war on terror that can never logically be won which is actually the whole reason behind it. We need to treat terrorists as the criminals they are and realise that this expensive game of hide and seek has cost us dearly in terms of civil liberties lost and increased security measures that won't prevent terrorists from attacking us but will destroy what remains of our way of life.

10. I believe that our intelligence services along with those of most modern countries do not act in the interests of "we the people" but instead collude with those powers that transcend nations to deliver us more quickly into the Orwellian police state that is rapidly rising around us more quickly as each day passes. 

Nearly every major terrorist atrocity of the last 20 years has a murky link with at least one intelligence agency or another who either had pre-knowledge and allowed it to happen or manipulated it from within though plants, informers and contractors. Plausible deniability has become the modus operandi of most agencies in regards to terror attacks and we need to spend more time helping people see through this.

11. I believe in personal liberty and freedom to make ones own decisions in life. However I also believe that in our crowded island we cannot lead a purely individualistic life without thought for our neighbours. With an "I'm all right jack" attitude to life where the rich get richer and the poor stay angry society becomes a violent and unfair place to live. I personally have no problem knowing that a proportion of my tax helps to provide someone else health care or school education and I would much rather my money was spent that way than on wars, bailouts to the financial industry and a huge high surveillance state apparatus.

12. I believe we have already gone too far in the march towards a high tech surveillance state that only serves to give the government too much control over our lives. We should scrap the proposed national ID card, tear down 99% of all CCTV cameras, repeal the RIPA Act as well as numerous Anti-Terrorism laws and the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act of 1994. The scales of justice have swung too far in favour of the state and we should always remember that its much harder to regain liberties from a government once they have been lost.

13. I believe that our war on drugs also falls in the same category as the war on terror as being an unwinnable and illogical concept that has no chance of succeeding in abolishing mankind's desire to temporarily escape his surroundings. Add to that the fact most career criminals are addicted to drugs and have to rob to pay for them it makes sense to rethink this policy of prohibition. The following article of mine talks about this in more details.

14. I believe our public state schools needs a total overhaul so that if you leave the system with good grades and the ability to think critically its not through pure luck. Religious education should be banned from state education as teaching kids to believe in fairy tales is not a good grounding for anything let alone for a world where miracles never happen. Philosophy, sociology, psychology and politics should be taught from a very early age as well as critical thinking, logic and reason and economics. 

Boys leave school with very little understanding of how to budget and live in the real world. Whereas girls often get taught on how to run a household from their mother boys leave school and usually go straight into the arms of banks and credit card companies and into a life of paying off debt. Most importantly the boy or girl that always questions  the teacher and asks "why?" should not be scolded or told off but nurtured and praised. Kids need to be taught to be skeptical and to always question authority.

So that's a list of some of the key things I believe in and hopefully they will let my detractors use the correct terminology when attacking me on Twitter. 

Now even though I believe in personal freedoms that is not to say that if I was granted supreme godlike powers over all mankind for all day and could ban or eradicate certain aspects of culture or human behaviour for all time I wouldn't do so for the good of humanity as a whole. These things would most definitely include: war, all organised religion, the Burka, cruelty to children & animals, public school boys, cheesy pop ballads and all Shopping Channels on TV.

By Dark Politricks

© 2018 Dark Politricks

Why you should read MY ARTICLES on darkpolitricks.com #altnews

By Dark Politricks

Who should follow me? Well let me lay it out for you in one article which you can find on darkAnyone who interested in news that is:

-Anti Establishment -
-Anti War / Peace e.g Not thinking a Russian is under your bed when you go to bed.
-Doesn't support the Petrodollar and the US doing anything for Israel and Saudi Arabia because they probably cleared Fort Knox out decades ago.
-Free Health care for everybody - even in the richest country on earth e.g USA

-A cut back on the US Empire by shutting at least half of their military bases around the world, ending the multi trillion dollar wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and all the other places we don't realise. Navy SEALS and Army Rangers are probably stalking, raping, killing in Africa right now then blaming it on the local militias as false flags.

Just as the Israeli's did in Iraq. Dress up as US soldiers then film themselves driving the roads just randomly shooting people to foment resentment and internal strife - plus guerrilla war against the USA.

-That false flags exist > http://www.darkpolitricks.com/2011/06/9-11-sceptics-versus-logic-reason-and-scientific-principles/

-That Russia isn't a utopia but we made a promise to them that we would not move NATO an inch forward towards it if they allowed the Berlin Wall to crumble and the Eastern Block to crack. Can you imagine the USA's response if there were as many Russian bases surrounding the states as there are US bases around Russia/China.

-Education should be free for life for everybody. To retrain for the new economies and just to learn philosophy in your 50's because you want to. You know that Stalin and many other dictators favourite philosopher was Plato and his book "the Republic" because Plato decided the only way to control society was to have a dictator who could get things done properly, but who didn't want the job, and had enough philosophical knowledge to treat his people fairly and equally.

Shame that link is always mentioned between dictators and Plato as we currently live in an Oligarchy of the rich 1% corporatist war machine, money fakers from Wall St who own Congress at the moment. A dictator may get decisions made and done quickly but the people need to put forward THEIR ideas for policies and have politicians come and get your vote.

-Ban lobbyists like the NRA and AIPAC and any group that has revolving door at Congress/Parliament (in any country) that pays off Senators and Congressman (oh and Obama with his half million dollar speeches in Wall St for weakening any regulations with the already piss poor Dodd Frank act) and then gives them jobs as lobbyists to make even more money.

If they are going to ban Redacted Tonight, an American based news show, presented by Americans on American issues just because it has links to the Russian state then they need to ban the BBC, AIPAC, AL-Jazeera and any other foreign "agents", as they are being called.

-The emergency laws enacted after 9.11 that allowed the President to declare war without Congress's permission is not over due for repeal but dangerous and anti-constitutional.

Only Congress can declare War. I suppose this is why we have so many "humanitarian emergencies to involve black hawk helicopters and missile launchers in' protecting the people by dropping "The Mother Of All Bombs" on buildings killing US citizens.

-Having to put masking tape over your webcams and cover microphones, turning GPS off on your phone or even removing batteries (if even possible anymore) to stop triangulation pings, and having GCHQ and the NSA listen and watch you like George Orwell's 1984 is not a 'FREE SOCIETY'.

When George W Bush after 9.11 lied and said the terrorists did this because they hate us for our freedoms we just handed them all away. Laws such as the PATRIOT ACT, NDA, Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), Torture, lack of Habeas Corpus, GITMO. Plus Allowing kids brought up on computer games shooting people with missiles to work in Las Vegas and kill REAL people in Afghanistan then imprisoning/or killing whistle-blowers and journalists who reveal the truth about Prism, xKeyScore, DNC / Podesta emails that showed Democrat primary fraud. Plus there are people who the US tried to extradite from the UK for almost a decade because they found before and after shots from NASA where alien ships had been removed from pictures before being handed out to universities such as Gary McKinnon .

That is an Oligarchy, power by the few.

A free county should have the politicians work for US not the other way round where institutional corporatism has seen Wall St, Silicon Valley and the MIC tell their puppets in Congress what to vote for. They don't care about you, they care about getting a nice cushy job for doing favours for whatever department they are running in Washington/London/Paris after their political career.

Harry Truman said 'No man can get rich in politics unless he’s a crook! It can’t be done.' - just look at how many millionaire politicians are in positions of power at the moment e.g Nancy Pelosi.

-If Iran cannot have nukes nor can Israel. Israel is not even in the NPA and we know they gave US secrets to the Russian through the worst US traitor ever, Jonathan Pollard who was freed after 30 years as a bargaining chip to stop illegal Israeli settlements - how did that go. He got over 60 CIA double agents killed due to his info on NATO plans for a nuclear retaliation > https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/20/spy-jonathan-pollard-to-be-free-after-30-years-but-still-a-thorn-in-us-israeli-ties

-Talking about nukes, at least we now have a treaty with Iran, which Trump wants to screw up. It ensures excess radioactive material is sent to Russia to be destroyed and that they won't go over a certain percentage needed to make nukes. It is in the Koran not to make such a destructive weapon and Iran has said many time both the mullahs and politicians that they would never build or use one. Iran never dropped missiles on Iraq in their 80's war despite the CIA giving Saddam Hussein the position of Iranian troops knowing he would gas them, killing hundreds of innocent people on a passenger flight, then later telling him it was ok to invade Kuwait > http://www.darkpolitricks.com/transcript-of-meeting-between-saddam-hussein-and-us-ambassador/

When he did invade Kuwait for slant drilling for Oil (drilling at an angle to get Oil from Iraq's water rather than their own) the US turned on him like all good US dictator allies have done to them when they are past their usefulness.

Iran NEVER dropped bombs on Baghdad or other Iraqi cities as they believed killing innocent people by their weapons was anti-Islamic.

Why is this never mentioned when talk of Iran wanting to wipe Israel off the map with nukes is discussed > http://www.darkpolitricks.com/does-irans-president-want-israel-wiped-off-the-map/ > and why is Israels's "Samson Option" > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qF5px7PsWjw > destroying the world if threatened, taking the whole Bible story temple/or Eastern/Western capital countries with them if threatened with annihilation.  

 

Tent cities in the richest country on earth due to Wall St kicking people out of their homes due to gambling their pension money. People going bankrupt or even dying because they cannot afford health insurance, kids with a trillion dollars worth of student debt and a country that basically runs on WAR is not a country with a light on the hill for others to look up to but the evil we need to fight before it kills us all.

When you finally wake up and realise we are not the good guys but the baddies then it may come as a shock to the system but facts are facts.

Just 3 books to read that might change your mind. If you have not woken up yet.

War is racket - by Smedley Darlington Butler - America's most decorated soldier.

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man - The shocking story of how America really took over the world.

Conspiracy the Secret History: In Search of the American Drug Lords - Barry and The Boys From Dallas To Mena - How the Iran/Contra scandal was all about using Mena Airport in Arkansas to fly guns down to the right wing rebels and coke back to Mena airport where the CIA used Ricky Freeway Ross (who made a $1 million a day) to sell thew new cheaper more addictive drug Crack in LA.

They always tipped him off giving him a head start on any police raid on his cooking houses that were always based next to freeways so he could get away fast. Supposedly a photo is supposed to exist that Barry Seal (the pilot shot by the CIA not Colombians as the 'official' story goes) had a secret photo of both Jeb and George W Bush collecting their own stash of coke at Mena, as well as the famous photo of Pablo Escobar helping load the coke onto the plane that started Ronald Reagan's 'war on drugs'. All as he secretly gave Iran arms to pass to Hezbollah who had US hostages in Lebanon.

It is most likely the reason Clinton was given the President's position due to Mena airport being in his state. When they investigated Barry's body they found a phone number and it was the personal phone no of the Vice President and ex head of the CIA, conspirator of the assassination of JFK whose Dad, Prescott Bush, wanted the USA to join Germany and become a Nazi nation during WWII - George H Bush.

Oh and the journalist who broke the story in his series the Dark Alliance series was found dead, apparently by suicide with 2 gun shots in his head.

A lot of people connected with the Clinton's have been found murdered or dead in very strange ways since they came on the scene and it seems to continue with the killing of Seth Rich who was in contact with WikiLeaks and used a USB stick to quickly transfer data from DNC computers. It just isn't possible for a remote hacker say Russians to transfer that much data over the web at that transfer speed. It had to be an "inside job" so to speak, and he paid for it very quickly.

So that's what I am about - come and join me, and if you can donate or visit advertisers then you will really help me out.

By Dark Politricks

© 2018 Darkpolitricks

Why did the Unelectable Corbyn get elected again?

Why did the Unelectable Corbyn get elected again?

By Dark Politricks

Once again the satirist, Johnathan Pie hits the nail on the head with Jeremy Corbyn's 2nd leadership election victory in a year.

Uneletable?

Well he now has an even bigger mandate to run Labour than he did before. Plus the Labour party now is the biggest political party in Europe with half a million members.

At a time when other political parties are dying. We have witnessed something akin to a reverse takeover of the Labour party. It is incomplete and it is certainly contested, but it is real.

Also by invoking the victories of Sadiq Khan in London and Marvin Rees in Bristol, he was showing that a social movement can yield victory at the ballot box -  - theguardian.com.

Let's see what Johnathan Pie has to say about the unelectable Labour leader.



What do you think of Jeremy Corbyn's 2nd massive victory to stay Labour leader within a year?

Is he really unelectable or are you just falling for the Murdoch press media?

The Tory spin in the Daily Mail and Telegraph that spews out the lies that we cannot spend our money investing in the country but rather on wars, Trident and filling the holes in the Treasury caused by austerity measures?

View the original article at brexit-to-leave-or-stay.blogspot.co.uk.

Will you vote to stay in the EU or leave it?

Will you vote to stay in the EU or leave it?

By Dark Politricks

As the debate rages around the UK on whether we should leave or stay in the EU. The question is are people really thinking for themselves or are they just believing all the crap that the daily rags tell them to?

We have owners of multiple papers who live offshore most of the year just to get out of paying their fair share of UK tax, telling us tax payers what to do. Is this really fair? It's just the rich elite who are always going to go from strength to strength as long as no-one stands up to them enforcing their will on the people as they always do.

Will people who vote actually make a real decision or will they be swayed like the US electorate always is to vote for the person with the biggest smile, angriest most bullish comments and plans to "restore America to greatness" as if it had suddenly become a third world country without the biggest economy and military in the world?

So the BREXIT referendum all rests on whether people believe the "deal" Cameron brought back was worth the paper it was written on or not.

To me Cameron's "Deal", is just a tinkering around the edges that prevents migrants from claiming benefits for years, and allows Britain to cap the number of people entering the country. It really doesn't make much of a difference at all.

We will still will be bound by the European Court of Human Rights, pay our monthly millions to be part of the EU, and whilst the Euro zone members make important financial decisions we will now be left out of them and probably still be asked to pay towards any bailouts such as those for Greece and Ireland etc.

I never got to vote to join the EC in the 70's.

That was the Economic Community, a joining together of countries for free trade without tariffs between members and a supposed opening up of the many countries nationalised utilities and businesses.

It was not a vote on whether we should join a European Super State, with its own Defence Force, a 3 tier decision-making system where the most democratic body, the European Parliament, has the least power.

People complain about the number of EU migrants that enter Southern Europe and are then just waved through multiple  counties until they reach Germany or Calais hoping to get to England. However we must remember that about 1.8m Britons live in Europe, with Spain boasting an expat population of just over 1m UK citizens.

Of the Britons living in Europe, 400,000 are claiming a state pension from the UK.

The question is, if free movement is good for us, what will happen when it is shut down. We may be able to control the number of migrants from the EU entering the country but what will happen to the retired wrinkled leather tanned grannies of the Costa Del Sol?


An ex Pat, enjoying the Sun and beach

Will these ex pats all have to go through some sort of immigration test as if they were trying to get green cards in the US?

I cannot even imagine many Brits passing any part of a test that expected them to know the hosts language and culture.

It could be that we manage to make arrangements that doesn't affect Brits with jobs OR money from going out to live in the EU however I am guessing a lot of EU members are really pissed off with us at the moment for getting a "special membership deal".

Whilst Germany and France wanted to keep us in the EU for the risk that it might fall apart, I can well imagine many newer members are thinking, why does the UK always try to get it's own way?

From my perspective it would have been good if Cameron had reached a consensus with other members that would have reformed the EU properly.

You know basic things like make it truly democratic, removed any moves to keep pushing for a super state, restored it back to a trading block that was good for business without all the imported laws and of course stopped all the massive fraud which has prevented a real audit for many years now.

There are lots of things wrong with the EU and the constant push towards a superstate is one of them. One of the original ideas was to try and make a block of states that was an equal balance to the power of the US but instead we have just turned into the USA's cross pond bitch.

So I believe Cameron's almost Chamberlain like "Peace in our time", excitement at having got his deal, is going to bite him in the butt just as Chamberlain found out when the NAZI's ignored his magic bit of paper and rolled across Europe.

This is small fry being pumped with steroids to make it seem like a massive change in our relationship with the EU. In reality it is some small changes around the edges.

If ever someone had made a worthless deal and wanted to sell it to the public as if it was a magic exemption from all the EU's meddling in our lives, like the EU Human Rights Law that protects us from this Police State country over reaching in its step, then this is it.

When I was younger I liked being able to hop on a plane and just go to Spain to live. I had no job but that didn't matter, free movement of people and workers meant we could all go where we wanted when we wanted without border checks, citizenship tests and green cards.

For those who have never lived abroad and have only gone to Ibiza on your holiday or maybe a trip to Paris on Valentines day then you won't really think about the difference between a holiday and actually being able to pick up your bags and literally run off to any part of Europe with no questions asked.

However whilst Spain has always been the old stereotyped destination for our UK retirees it seems over recent year the US, Australia and the rest of the world have overtaken Europe for the primary destination for those with one foot in the grave.

The top 10 destinations for Britons to retire to are now:

• Channel Islands: 73,030
• Germany: 96,938
• France: 172,806
• Ireland: 253,605
• South Africa: 305,660
• New Zealand: 313,850
• Spain: 381,025
• Canada: 674,371
• United States of America: 758,919
• Australia: 1,277,474

So maybe the modern "cultured" Brit is changing their retirement plans and thinking a bit more further than the Costa Del Crime nowadays.

Spain has always been our number one destination for holidays and retirees. A place where you can enjoy the 40° heat and drink British beer in pubs frequented by famous English gangsters on the run.

So many famous British gangsters have been out to the Costa Del Sol no wonder we call it the Costa Del Crime.

However it seems we are looking wider than Med for our retirement plans - that's if we get any pension money. I doubt I will ever see any from the thousands I have put into the system over my working career. It seems the Tories want us to work until our 80's and the age is constantly being pushed upwards.

There have been rumblings from Tory think tanks for years now from people already on hundreds of thousands of pounds a month pensions who believe we should do voluntary work in our retirement to collect our hard earned pension.

Leaving the EU won't stop any evil Tory plans from coming to fruition and if we want a REAL CHANGE in our democracy and the way we act in the world we should be thinking about NATO. 

What would we do if Turkey start a war with Russia over Syria, we would be forced to fight on their side whether they started the war by deception or not. I am more worried about World War III happening due to duplicitous NATO allies at the moment than the amount of money we pay in and get back in rebates from the EU.

We should also be thinking about how the Tories have tripled our national debt in the years they were supposedly "fixing the roof whilst the sun was shining", and supposedly cutting the ever so important deficit. The deficit may have dropped but the total amount of debt has increased hugely due to the Tories thinking that the poorer we all are, the more money we will spend.

They have failed us. In Europe, on the world stage and most importantly at home.

Austerity hasn't worked at all and the national debt has ballooned because of the Tories core voters (the grey brigade), will vote against anyone who dares to cut their pensions.

These take up a vast proportion of the social security budget and will undoubtedly be ignored whist the disabled and poor are forced to suffer through the bedroom tax, universal credit, and the severe lack of social housing we have in this country.

Europe has no control over these areas of our lives and if we want to sort out our country we really need to get rid of the failed Tories and try their method of printing money, not at 0% interest rates so the Banksters can lend it to us through companies like WONGA at 5,853% APR, but to invest in infrastructure, building new homes and putting people through education. If we can do it for the banks why can't we do it for the people?

Remember we were in a much worse off state in the years after WWII. We only just finished off paying our debt to the US a few years ago under Gordon Brown.

Despite that we still created the NHS, cleared the slums of London and built thousands of new houses and multiple new towns for the people moved out of London. Plus we ushered in an age of economic prosperity that latest decades.

It is only short-sighted Tory thinking that keeps us in the current trap we are in. One where bankers must be bailed out even though they should be in jail, and the poor are paying off the national debt, despite having no money.

If only we would just wipe any national debt on citizens like Iceland did to many mortgage holders that were linked to inflation. It sounds crazy but would put money in the pockets of those most likely to spend it, plus create a huge demand for goods and a rise in GDP.

Having a "National Bank" that can print money as long as it's for investment in houses and jobs could give us full employment, cheaper rent and accommodation costs and more money in the pocket to spend to increase GDP.

At the moment our whole economy, just like it was during Labours time in office, is built on the house of cards made from debt. People remortgaging houses or taking out loans to spend on goods. An unsustainable recovery. Screw the bankers who say it cannot be done. We did it for you, why can't we do it to actually help rebuild our country?

So the question is, are people going to think with their heads or their hearts about this exit from the EU.

A lot has changed with the European project to stop a further European war after WWII, with France and Germany the two main actors in this union coming together to ensure that the rest of Europe sticks together and shows "solidarity".

From stopping a war to free trade agreements and a central bank. Then a EU flag, courts and parliament. Then laws enforced on us which we don't want. All whilst we pay billions to be part of a club that's money could be better spent on hospitals and schools. That is one argument for leaving.

The problem is that war fades in people's minds, especially those who never fought in WWII or who had family who did.

"What does the EU have to do with WWII" many people will ask.

Now that the EU project is more about creating a super state, it spies on us and hands over all bank transactions to the US as well as traces of our Internet history and anything else the NSA overlords demand. However even if we leave the EU I guess due to our "special relationship", with the US, we would still carry on letting our GCHQ be the NSA's bitch, so nothing would change on the police state front.

Also whilst we may collaborate as a big trading block to face China, the BRICS and North American trading blocks, can the BREXIT crew really convince us that on an economic scale we would really be better outside this trading block.

Selling tea to India, ornaments to Russia and other small manufactured products across the world is the BREXIT plan. We don't build big things anymore. Our ship building industry is almost gone and we have offshored so many jobs that actually make things, you know jobs good for all those skilled manual workers we are trying to find jobs for, that we are just a service economy. Selling ideas, concepts and of course bank trickery.

If we leave the EU will we survive without the cheap gas and electricity we import from the EU, or will we get extra tariffs put on them putting us even further into debt. The French/Chinese nuclear power stations that were supposed to be on their way have only just been signed off.

It will take another 20 years at least until we see these new power stations so we will be relying on our dwindling North Sea Oil stocks and imports seeing that we never really bothered investing in green energy.

This is despite being an island surrounded by multiple ways of making energy from natural sources such as the sea, wind and sun. We have loads of places to put under sea turbines that use wave power and windmills off shore to take in their blustery winds. We really never tried as we suffered from a  "not in my back garden" mentality, whenever a wind farm was proposed to be build anyway near a house.

So will people even consider the financial terms of leaving or will they think what the Sun, Daily Mail and other trash papers tell them to think?

The EU is a debt ridden collection of states that turned the thumb screws on Greece, Italy and Spain all so that they could enforce austerity, increase taxes and pay back Goldman Sachs and that other evil trio, the European Bank, IMF and World Bank.

Do we want to live in a place that see's solidarity between nations as one that involves throwing the poor to the dogs so that their rich Banksters who caused the mess can be fully compensated. Plus solidarity is not where Germany gets to bend the rules but smaller states can't lest they risk German austerity plans as the cost of remaining in the Euro.

This financial crisis that has still not been solved since 2008 is just waiting for another explosion. When it comes it will make 2008 look like a picnic.

Will the UK, the hub of banksters from the terrorist supporting, Mexican drug dealing, al-Qaeda funding HSBC to the corrupt Barclay's brothers, really be better inside or out when the next economic explosion occurs.

As the City of London is basically it's own country within a country, where the leaders of the companies and banks get to sit on their special council and can "command" the Chancellor to appear before them, they will probably see no difference in their money making schemes whether we leave or stay.

To me it all depends on who is in charge.

The Tories seem to want to put the strain of any recovery on the backs of the working class whilst rewarding their rich friends.

Their recent budget removed £30 from the disabled people of our country that gave them support to get dressed and move about and instead they have given the richest more tax breaks. It is clear where their priorities lie. Voting Tory is like voting for a gang rape on yourself. Why people do it I have no idea.

On the other hand Labour, SNP, the Greens and Lib Dems feel that a more even policy that involves banksters going to jail and splitting up the banks between Casinos and Savings is called for.

On top of that more measures that don't punish the poor but instead help them climb up the ladder whilst the rich who have become more wealthy in the last 5+ years are made to contribute their fair share.

Whether they will actually stick to their words is a totally different matter. We just have to look at the Lib Dems when they got their taste of power to see how power corrupts and good promises become faded memories.

So what will make you vote yes or no when the time comes?

EU Democracy or the lack of it?

The prospect of war?

Finance and austerity?

Migration?

Not being held to account to the European Convention of Human Rights (an act the Tories wrote after WWII to show how civilised we are)

Or something else?

Let me know.

View the original article at www.darkolitricks.com.

By Dark Politricks

 

 

© 2016 By Dark Politricks

Why Their Is No Difference Between Democrats and Republicans

Why Their Is No Difference Between Democrats and Republicans

By Dark Politricks


There is no difference between the Republicans and Democrats

I know that Conservatives in the US call Obama a Marxist and the Democrats attack the GOP as money grabbers for the rich, but in reality there is very little difference between the GOP and the Democrats.

From my perspective across the pond I haven't seen the US change for the better since all my years of being interested in US politics. This includes both Republican and Democratic Presidencies as well as times where the President was of the same party that controlled both houses of Congress yet still didn't push through policies you would expect them to.

Both the GOP and Democratic parties are:

• Pro war, even if it means possible world war with Russia/China.
• Pro Israel and pro AIPAC / JDL plus anti Palestinian rights.
• Pro regime change (Iraq, Libya, Ukraine & Syria to name a few).
• Pro drone strikes even on US citizens without judicial review.
• Pro Bankster & Wall St and anti Working Class & main street.
• Pro Police arbitrary killings. It feels as if the streets of some US cities are full of uninformed paramilitary death squads at the moment.
• Pro NSA/FBI/CIA/Homeland security spying on you through your cars GPS, phones microphone/cameras, websites visited from your ISPs and server log files and even now through your TV!

If you have a new "Smart TV", have you actually read the privacy statement they make you sign in detail?

If not do so!

I read my new 4k TVs statement the other night and it mentioned built-in microphones and cameras installed into the TV to take photos of you for facial recognition and even to record your height, weight and vocal patterns.

Of course they claim that this is just to help deliver you tailored adverts and help with certain smart apps such as those that use voice commands or hand gestures but all this data goes off to a 3rd party company first to be analysed.

The legalese didn't mention who got access to this data or how long it was stored just that it could be used by the appropriate authorities and that non compliance was covered by New York Law.

Therefore if you break your new Smart TV's terms and conditions in any way you can have US policemen coming to arrest you wherever you are in the world. I have to wonder which 3 letter agencies get access to all this data, it really has become that Telescreen from George Orwell's 1984, if not I don't know how much closer they can become.

Just like phones which when switched off still have enough power to ping the phone masts and therefore record your whereabouts, I'd have a good bet that there is just enough power when your TV is in standby mode to record you through the microphone and camera.

Therefore don't rely on turning off your camera/microphone in the settings, if you are that paranoid go back to basics and cover them with masking tape. The simplest methods are best. However when even your TV is a sophisticated computer that can spy on you and record your actions and speech then we really have entered George Orwell's dystopian world.

Also people forget that our phones are those microchips everybody worried about having implanted in them to keep track of them by the Government in the 90s. It was the big thing, being chipped, a conspiracy theory that was just in the mind of tin foil hat wearing loons. However we happily take our phones with us everywhere we go. We constantly "Sign In", and "log where we are", "tag who we are with", and write down everything we are doing. Leaving a nice long trail of our life on the Internet to be remembered for decades to come.

To the youngsters of today there is no concept of privacy and they seem happy to give that away for the ability to communicate and therefore be logged and recorded.

With our mobile and household tracking devices we can now be located and spied on 24/7 and if you are a terrorist, domestic extremist, protester or even a citizen journalist (under new US combatant rules), you could find yourself being the target of something nasty flying through the air.

Microsoft, Facebook and Google constantly hand over all your private chat data, search requests, emails, and history of websites that we've visited to the authorities. Both if asked and sometimes just as standard due to their close relationships with the alphabet agencies of the US surveillance state. Google took seed money from the CIA and helped them design some of the NSA's searching algorithms for programs similar to those Snowden leaked such as PRISM and XKeyScore. Plus Microsoft was adding chips into their PC's from the 90's to help the NSA override any secure cryptography so that they could access your PC at will. Even the BBC reported on it in this 1999 article.

There is no difference between Democrats and Republicans on the issue of national security which means knowing as much as possible about as many people as possible.

ISIS which is a creation of US/UK Middle Eastern foreign policy, just as al-Qaeda was a database of CIA cut out agents/Jihadists, used to destabilise countries as ex UK Foreign Minister, Robin Cook wrote about, are used to scare us into just handing over all our civil liberties that the terrorists supposedly hate us for having. The US were bombing ISIS for a year as their Caliphate grew in size. Therefore they were either very bad at their bombing campaign compared to the Russians or they were allowing them to survive. Using the existence of these terrorists as an excuse to cut our civil liberties is basically doing their job for them.

If they truly "hate us for our freedoms", as George W Bush famously said, we shouldn't hand all our freedoms away never for them to return with laws like the Patriot ACT and the NDAA and in the UK the multitude of anti-terrorism bills that have been passed.

So it's the same with all 3 states in the Axis of War, the UK, France and the USA who have all suspended certain rights and freedoms due to the "threat" of terrorism.

I'd really like to see both Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn be leaders of both the USA and UK at the same time JUST TO SEE if REAL CHANGE is even possible from the top down.

When Obama came into office on a wave of support due to his meaningless chant of "We Can Change", it seemed to me that the slogan was purely about the colour of the White House occupants. Therefore I don't even believe real change from the top is actually possible, never been tried, or just stopped by the main string pullers from behind the curtains.

Having two characters like Bernie and Corbyn in power would at least show us if it was still possible to change the world for the better whether you like their policies or not.
If both these men did have full control and held true to the principles they currently state then in power we should see:

• Less prison for drugs and minor offences.
• Less Banksters running a mock with our tax payers money and no "too big to fail or jail" companies allowed to bank roll terrorists and drug cartels (e.g HSBC).
• Less spending on the department of war and more on education, job creation, house building and investment in the people and country instead of wasting it on £800,000 missiles that are fired into rubble in pointless overseas wars.
• Less stupid overtures that suggest our leaders want to start a new cold (or even hot) war with Russia. They seem to forget Russia helped solve the Iran nuclear deal, remove chemical weapons from Syria and are basically crushing DAESH in Syria despite Turkey and Saudi Arabian support for the Jihadists.
• Less power to corporations who are NOT real people with feelings and emotions yet in the USA under law they are treated as such and so during elections pump millions into campaigns of people who will benefit them if they get into power.
• Better and cheaper health care free at the point of use in the US, and less middle management and PPI hospitals in the UK that are bankrupting us into the future.
• Free adult education and the ability to retrain and gain new skills throughout your life to keep you in a job. Having taxpaying workers is much better than people relying on state handouts.
• Oh and all the stolen civil liberties we have had removed from us due to the "War on Terror" returned in the hundreds.

The Two Faced Janus Coin of American Politics

Both Main Parties in the USA Serve The Same Interests

These are all good reasons why we need strong 3rd parties in the USA and UK.

Many Europeans don't even realise that 3rd parties exist in the USA. Parties such as the Greens, Libertarians, Justice Party and even (shock horror) socialists!

Major political reform is needed so that these parties get a fair shake of the whip during elections, can debate the other parties on the major networks, and get the air time they require to make a dent into the two-faced Janus coin called American Democratic elections.

Of course the reason they don't is that the debates are all staged collusion with the networks who are all filled with COINTELPRO government mouthpieces. They have no urge to see REAL change come to the USA and actually do something to shake up the status quo.

How many Americans know they are still living under "Emergency Laws" enacted after 9 11 giving the President ultimate power. When will this end?

How good would an alliance be between the UK and the USA that would get on with other nations better and stop real evil e.g Israeli illegal occupation of Palestinian lands and Chinese/Saudi treatment of their people instead of selling weapons and outsourcing all our jobs to them.

Money should not matter more than morals but to George Osborne, Obama and the US/UK arms companies who must carry on their trade it seemingly does.

Our allies are not dissimilar to our enemies e.g ISIS and Saudi Arabia, yet we allow the 7th century hypocritical scum that the Saudi's are to continue with own Janus act of both funding and fighting terrorism.

However will this ever happen or will the establishment prevent the elections of such men as Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn  due to the threat of real change?

The realistic outcome is that some idiot like Donald Trump or a warmonger like Hillary Clinton will get into power in the USA to reign alongside an equally right-wing Tory party in the UK and the Axis of War will roll on.....

One can only wish.....

Remember, as George Orwell famously said:

War is Peace

Freedom is Slavery

Ignorance is Strength

Oh, and you do have a real choice in your elections.

 
View the original article at the main site www.darkpolitricks.com.

By Dark Politricks
 
© 2015 Dark Politricks