The Gasslighting of America

"Are you still talking about this creep?"

By Dark Politricks

The gaslighting of us sheep by the US Government over confirmed sex predator and sex trafficker, Jeffery Epstein, has begun. With the DOJ issuing a report saying the Jeffery Epstein case is over, and that there is no client list.

Donald Trump attacked reporters the other day who asked Pam Bondi, head of the DOJ, for details on the Jeffery Epstein case, only to get a reply that there is "No Epstein Client List". 

Even if he didn't have a client list written in a black book, as everyone expects there is. We have seen the flight lists, and the paying off of victims by Prince Andrew. So there were lots of important people flying to his island, and they were doing something there, apart from just getting massages. 

Even Epstein's lawyer, who also defended Gishlane Maxwell, was named as someone someone who had abused Virginia Giuffre. That was until she changed her mind and said she "had made a mistake", about Epstein's lawyer assaulting her. Someone with Alan Dershowitz's face is pretty hard to forget. 

I wouldn't be surprised if the counter suit he launched against her scared her off, and was the primary reason she changed her mind. I find it very hard to believe a sexual abuse victim could mistake the person assaulting her 6 times, on Epstein's plane, on the island, and in his mansion, as she claimed he did. 

Epstein's butler in a deposition claimed Deshowtiz was always around Epstein, even after he had been convicted the 1st time in 2008, including when underage girls were in the building. I find it very odd for someone to want to defend and hang around with sex traffickers and pedo's, and he has viciously attacked Giuffre for being a lying prostitute.  

However, he is a well connected staunch Zionist, and I wouldn't be surprised if the threat of losing the millions paid to her by Prince Andrew, in a court case with a lawyer like him, scared her enough to insist she "got his face wrong". 

Not being funny, but I think if anyone had the Desh on top of them, it would be hard to forget that distinctive ugly mug of his, especially if as Giuffre claims he raped her multiple times.

Plus he was someone who changed his story 3 times, from someone who had a massage from one of these sex slaves, who he had no idea of course about their situation, but kept his pants on. To telling the world his wife had organised the massage, something he didn't even like having, which seems a bit strange.

It is clear Epstein had links to Israeli intelligence, his girlfriend Gishlane Maxwell certainly had. It ran in her family, her father, Robert Maxwell, worked with various intelligence agencies, mainly Mossad.

Some believe he died on his yacht when Mossad agents pushed him overboard, as his pension scandal at the Mirror in which he had stolen millions, just brought too much heat. It is still a debate whether he just fell overboard, committed suicide, or had help being "suicided".

It seems Gishlane Maxwell was the brains of the blackmail operation according to the victims, yet she was convicted in a trial where the no of witnesses to her abuse were whittled down to a handful, and she has been locked away in a minimum security prison for a term she will probably see out. 

Alan Dershowitz has already called for Trump to pardon her. Why? 

He seems to be very friendly with this duo even after the outrage of her crimes. Then we have the blatant lies from Pam Bondi, who claimed all the videos found at his property we all saw on the news at the time, were just child porn that Epstein liked to watch. 

This is just taking the piss out of everybody in MAGA, Democrats, and anyone who has been following this story. 

We are being gaslight about a major scandal that the elites just seem to want to sweep away. Especially as it has links to Israeli intelligence, and the Zionists Trump is surrounding himself with probably don't want to embarrass an ally, just as President Johnson said, after Israel tried sinking the USS Liberty in the 1967 war.

There is no mention that every property Epstein owned had cameras in every room and bathroom, and that so many influential people visited these properties for parties and "massages", by sex trafficked women.

From the surface it clearly seems that the Trump administration has just taken what they found, and wants to carry on using the evidence, to hold control over the powerful people involved. 

This video explains it well. 

Where is the FBI? 

Kash Patel promised to go after anyone involved with Epstein's sex trafficking and we know big names like Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and Bill Gates were visiting this sex island. 

Why have the known 25 underage sex victims at the time, not been brought in to see if any of these famous faces were amongst those that abused them?

Donald Tump campaigned against a 2 tier justice system when he was being attacked by Democratic lawfare, but it is clear the United States justice system is for sale. 

If you are rich and famous, and involved in sick stuff, the FED's who usually have over a 90% conviction rate, seem to just drop the ball, and allow those elites to get away with their sick abuse.

Just look at the P Diddy Trial, where there was so much evidence, and he had basically been convicted in the eyes of the public. However, the prosecutor Maurene Comey, dropped major charges, ignored the kid sex trafficking, as well as little Rods affidavit where he named names. 

This included the security guard who had control of all the video tapes from yet another blackmail operation, as well as big names in Hollywood who amazingly were not even looked into. Again, a situation where P Diddy had cameras in every room and bathroom to film drugged up guests shagging prostitutes and under age girls and boys.

She didn't even put Diddy on the stand to ask him any questions, and his defence didn't even bring forth any witnesses. They obviously knew the fix from the FED's was in, and they just had to let them fuck up the trial, so that he would only be charged with what Alex Jones said, "Was legal in Las Vegas".

I think we saw some of the results of his blackmail during the 2024 election, where famous Hollywood stars and singers, all known attendees of his parties, came out to do feeble endorsements of Kamala Harris. 

They obviously got a call reminding them of the dirt they had on them and were pressured into making speeches endorsing Kamala Harris. That's ignoring all those celebrities who left the country as soon as Diddy was in jail.

Ellen a good friend of Diddy, and an attendee of his black parties, fled to England, and Leo De Caprio, where apparently a tape of him shagging an under age girl was apparently being handed around Hollywood, went straight to Italy after Diddy was banged up.

However, there is nothing to see here, according to Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, despite their earlier comments on the matter that "The files are on my desk".

So lets just move on and forget that it certainly feels like a number of politicians and elites have been compromised. 

Whitney Webb who wrote One Nation Under Blackmail, has extensively detailed the Israeli Intelligence and Mob ties to the blackmailing of US politicians since the countries creation, in her amazing books. 

However, now that the evidence seems to be in Trumps hands, and after campaigning on a Presidency of transparency, we now are told by him to just forget about it. This is not what he, and Pam Bondi, were saying only a few months ago.

It seems that this lie is not to deceive the public, who all recognize the lies, but it's a signal to those implicated in Epstein's scheme, to let them know that the Government will protect them at all costs, whatever sick stuff they have done.

So lets all forget that, and ignore the 300,000 already missing kids, Biden let in.

Oh and don't even read ex US Attorney General Bill Barrs Dad's "fiction" novel, Space Relations, about a planet ruled by oligarchs who are so rich and bored, they engage in ritualistic sex abuse with minors for "entertainment".

It seems a bit of an odd story line to write a novel about. That is unless you believe he was writing from his own experience, where we know sex abuse of children is going on, and being constantly covered up by the Elites.

Here is the Epstein client List for your viewing, as composed by Ryan Dawson. 

He meticulously went through all the legal documents and affidavits from the sex abused survivors to create this list. 

 

So there is nothing to see here, so carry on you dumb cows.

Just keep asking AI on your phone, what to do and what to believe. 

Especially when the elites ask you to walk straight into the slaughter house.

.................................... 

Let me know what you think about this gaslighting by the DOJ and President Trump over Epstein's non existent "client list".

By Dark Politricks

© 2025 - Dark Politricks

Russia Attacked - Trump Denies Knowledge - Starmer Warns Brits Of War

Russian Strategic Bombers Attacked In 18 Month Ukrainian "Spider Web" Plot

By Dark Politricks

Prepare For The End Of Free Speech As NATO Attacks Russia - is WWIII coming?

Free Speech has definitely gone in the UK and Europe.

I have just been banned from X for saying Macron deserved another slap from his "wife" for declaring we should go to war with Russia.

Israel is also busy using creating laws across the USA and Europe, that make any criticism of their concentration camps ( Ironic or just sick?), for Gazans to receive food, anti-Semitic! 

This is as Palestinian resistance fighters are still killing IDF soldiers when it comes man to man, rather than just bombing refugee tents, as seen in this video. No wonder the Israeli's have killed more journalists in this war than any other.

Also, expect it to be cracked down in the UK for people like me, and sites like www.darkpolitricks.com.

This, all for telling you the truth about our devious activities in Ukraine, that have seen us teeter on the edge of full nuclear Armageddon.

Just now the BBC is reporting that at 5AM, Ukraine used under water explosives to blow up part of the Kursk bridge connecting Crimea to Ukraine. 

However, the Russian Transport Ministry reported that while the bridge had to be closed twice over the course of the day, normal traffic had resumed as of Tuesday evening.

This comes after a massive attack on civilian and military infrastructure across Russia that saw 7 people die, and another 71 injured, when a train was de-railed on a bridge, with 2 attacked over the last couple of days. 

Plus swarms of drones have been attempting to hit Moscow but have been shot down by their superior air defense around the capital.

I heard on the news yesterday that our "Dear Leader", Sir Keir Starmer is telling us Brits, to "prepare for war".

This is after MI6 thought it was a clever idea to help Ukraine attack Russian strategic airbase's all across their country. The bases attacked was during a plan called "Spider Web", and attacked bases in Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ivanovo, Ryazan, and Amur regions. 

Ukrainian officials estimate the damage at over $7 billion, with bombers such as the TU-95, TU-22M3, and A-50 surveillance aircraft reportedly among the assets destroyed.

This 18 month plan, could have only been done with NATO satellite imagery, that gave the Ukrainians targeting data on Russian bases.

There is no way in the world that Ukraine would have been able to carry this attack out, without a greenlight from their MI6/CIA controllers.

They used trucks with removal able roofs and drones that then flew out the top and attacked Russian planes on the airfield.

These were Russia's strategic bombers, just one arm of their nuclear deterrent.

They reckon almost a 3rd of their fleet was destroyed, and that it was the biggest military defeat in terms of lost aircraft, since the NAZI's launched their invasion of the USSR in WWII.

Here is a Ukrainian Tweet on Operation Spider Net.

Ukrainian "Pavutyna" (spider net) operation is today's attack launched simultaneously on four russia's strategic aviation airbases has reportedly destroyed 40 (forty) strategic bombers on 4 (four) airbases: Belaya (4700 km from Ukraine), Dyagilevo (700 km), Olenya (2000 km),… pic.twitter.com/AYr5g7Xr7L

— Sergej Sumlenny, LL.M (@sumlenny) June 1, 2025

The Russian Defense Ministry confirmed the attacks but stated that three out of five strikes were successfully repelled, causing no damage or casualties.

The remaining two resulted in aircraft catching fire, which was quickly extinguished, according to the ministry, which also did not confirm the loss of any aircraft.

Does Sir Kier Starmer even know what MI6 are doing over in Ukraine?

Or are they acting like a rogue intelligence agency without Government oversight, just like the CIA?

Apparently, Trump doesn't seem to have full control over the constantly self governing CIA. Or whoever does, it doesn't seem to be his civilian appointment, John Ratcliffe. He was asked twice about the recent drone swarm attack on Russian President Vladmir Putin's helicopter in Kursk the other day by reporters, and didn't seem to have even heard anything about it.

The incident occurred during a week of heightened conflict between Russia and Ukraine, with Moscow reporting the interception of 764 drones between Tuesday and Friday, and hundreds more over the weekend. Russia’s Defence Ministry claimed the attacks targeted multiple regions deep within Russian territory.

In retaliation, Russian forces launched a series of missile strikes over the weekend, reportedly targeting a drone and missile production facility in Kyiv, followed by additional strikes on Ukrainian military installations.

Zelenskyy, and other Western leaders in Europe seem almost gleeful at Ukraine's attempt to put pressure OR ruin the attempted peace talks that are going on with this massive attack on Russian Strategic bombers, as well as attacks on civilians across Russia. 

However, the response has been a massive sign up of Russian men to join the war, they are winning on the battlefield. According to some sources the Russians artillery outnumber the Ukrainians 20 to 1.

Also, for every Russian killed there are 20 to replace him, whilst Ukraine is resorting to more pressganging, dragging men off the street, and forcing them to fight.

It's almost as if people have forgotten that Russia has more than one way to wipe us off the map, and they talk about it every night on TV.

They have submarines equipped with hypersonic missiles we can't shoot down, sitting off our coast, as well as the Sarmat/Satan2 nuclear fueled missile which can circle the globe for days, before dropping its payload.

On the Russian nightly TV Show, "The Great Game", they discuss ways to wipe us off the map, and routinely attack Putin for not having done so yet.

Russia has a number of super weapons listed in the video below, that haven't been used yet, and the nightly Russian TV show, routinely talks about how just one new Poseidon nuclear powered torpedo in the Irish Sea, could cause a Tsunami that would cover Britain in water.

If the UK believes it's ok for Ukraine to try and assassinate Putin with a drone swarm as he flew into Kursk within a helicopter, only a week ago, and not even report on it. Then just imagine, if Russia had wiped Zelenskyy out with a Kinzhal hypersonic missile one night?

What would our dumbed down for the NAFO masses, news be full of the next day?

It would be full of pro war rhetoric about how Putin doesn't want peace, and how we should attack Russia.

People need to realise how much restraint Putin has shown in the face of Ukrainian attacks on him, the Kremlin, and the people of Moscow.

People need to realise that if he is killed, someone with less restraint would certainly take over.

Someone like ex Russian President and PM, Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chair of Russia’s Security Council. 

In a social media post, Medvedev addressed domestic calls for a more forceful military response, declaring that Russian retaliation was “inevitable.”

“Our army is on an active offensive and will continue its push forward. Everything that needs to be blown up will be, and those who need to be eliminated will be,” he wrote.

He is someone who regularly makes statements about wiping us, and most of Europe, off the face of the Earth for what we have done. Starting a proxy war with Russia that has been building up over the last 20yrs.

So when I hear Sir Kier Starmer on the news tell us to prepare for war what are we supposed to do?

Russia can wipe our tiny country and our tiny armed forces out in the blink of an eye, and we are forcing him to do so with recent actions such as the assassination attempts in Kursk, and now this massive attack on his Strategic Airforce.

We can't buy and practise with guns seeing the UK government disarmed the country decades ago.

This is one of the main reasons the Soviets never planned or even thought about an invasion of America during the Cold War, due to the massive private gun ownership by the US population.

Not that Russia wants to invade us, but everyone in the queue for leader behind Putin wants to blow us off the map for what we just did, all on top of our previous admitted crimes of:

• Overthrowing the democratically elected leader of Ukraine in a coup during 2014 and installing far right wing Banderite NAZI collaborator worshippers who killed 16,000 Russian speaking Ukrainians in the Donbass region who voted to leave Ukraine.
• Training Ukraine's army to NATO standards to fight Russia and take back Donestk and Luhansk.
• Stopping Zelenskyy signing the Istanbul peace accords which would have stopped any war, all because UK PM, BoJo promised him money and weapons to fight Russia with.
• Giving him SAS bodyguards to prevent the Right Sektor from hanging him in Stephan Bandera St (previously named Moscow Ave) if he dared any peace negotiations with Russia. This makes all those claims that "there were no NAZIS in Ukraine" plainly stupid.
• Sabotaging Nord Stream 2. Lizz Truss, UK PM's, iPhone had been hacked with Israeli Pegasus software by the Russians and they saw a text she had sent Tony Blinken, just minutes after the bombing, saying "its done".
• Plus journalist Seymour Hersh, wrote articles describing the US plans to do the bombing with the UK, and how it was carried out.
• Helping Terrorists use an IRA style truck bomb full of fertiliser to blow up the Crimean bridge. Also they used an unexpecting driver who didn't know he was about to be killed to drive the truck.
• Helping Ukrainian rebels pretend to be ISIS-K (well all ISIS groups are MI6/CIA/Mossad assets), and attack a Russian concert, The Crocus Massacre, killing over a 100 Russian kids, and then trying to escape to Ukraine.
• Training GLADIO style stay behind terrorists, to plant bombs in Crimea and the Donbass.
• The jailing, torture and assassination of pro-Russia Ukrainian politicians, and journalists including Americans such as Gonzalo Lira.
• Assassinations by the SBU of journalists like Lira, for daring to come onto popular podcasts like The Duran, to talk about the legitimacy of Russia's invasion to protect the people of the Donbass.
• Assassinations in Russia on military and civilian targets. One famous assassination was on the philosopher, Alexander Dugin's daughter. Despite her having nothing to do with the war or her fathers writings, she had got into his car which was primed with a bomb, still the greenlight was given to blow the car up by MI6.
• The CIA/SBU kill list which has US politicians like Sen Rand Pauls, as well as peace activists, and journalists names on it. These include Ex CIA officer, Ray McGovern; former military and intelligence figures such as Scott Ritter and Douglas McGregor, as well as academics such as John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs. Journalists on the list included Glenn Greenwald, Tucker Carlson and Eva Bartlett, Roger Waters from Pink Floyd, and even actor Steven Seagal. Those that have been killed, have black crosses painted over their names once "eliminated".

This kill list is tolerated by the CIA despite still having the name of Trumps Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, on it.

So what does Sir Kier Starmer expect us to do when the new Russian Oreshnik missile comes online?

We saw it first in action last year, when it was became the first ICBM launched during wartime, when it atomised a huge warehouse with a deep underground bunker, full of ATACMS and Storm Shadow missiles that NATO had stored.

We had been using them for attacks deep into Russia during our invasion of the Kursk region where the cream of Ukraine's armed forces, and the majority of their foreign legion of UK/US soldiers were eventually destroyed by Russian troops.

We don't have a war time economy like Russia, that can turn out 300 tanks a day.

The question is who gave the green light for this attack to go ahead the day before peace talks in Istanbul were about to start? 

Trump denies any knowledge, obviously, as he doesn't want this to be "his war", but Biden's. 

However, one of the European leaders like Starmer or Macron, who have been training Ukrainian SBU sabotage units, certainly could have told Zelenskyy, that it would give him more "cards to play with". Due to their dislike of Trump, and their seeming desire to keep this war going. 

We have nothing to compare with all of Russia's super weapons.

So what does Sir Kier Starmer mean when he says "We must prepare for war"?

What are you going to do?

By Dark Politricks

© 2025 - Dark Politricks

Google AI Tells Conference Apollo Footage Was Faked!

Google AI analysis of Moon Landing photos show it was faked at AI conference

By Dark Politricks

As my time is nearing an end, I thought for a bit of fun and to get away from all the doom and gloom of Gaza, Ukraine and Donald Trump, I thought a good old conspiracy theory orientated article was in need of posting.

There are a few main conspiracies that have stuck around us for decades, whilst modern obvious ones like the assassination attempts on Donald Trump, COVID, and Epstein, seem to be getting ignored, there are a few good ones that will never die and seem to always be debated, such as who killed JFK, and was 9.11 an inside job.

Another one is the Moon Landing Conspiracy. Did we really go to the moon? 

Or rather did NASA really go to the moon in 1969, and was what the world saw on their TV sets really Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin walking on the moon, or was it men on a film set?

Can people hold conflicting conspiracy or rather scientific theories in their head at the same time?

Can someone believe in Aliens, man made UAPS, Steven Greers "Lost Century", of progress due to Zero Point Energy, the sort Nikola Tesla and other inventors found out about at the beginning of the 20th Century, but were silenced over. 

As well as "free energy" from the Aether (now called the Quantum Vacuum), proved by The Casimir Effect, that could free mankind from Robber Barons that control us through our Petro-Carbon society we currently exist in, 

AND believe in Moon based conspiracy theories?

Theories such as, we didn't go to the moon at all in 1969, and it was all staged due to the Space Race, and JFK's promise to go to the Moon by the end of the century. Then due to NASA realising that it was impossible to achieve this, they decided to fake the whole event to win the race against the USSR.

It seems like an impossible equation doesn't it?

How can you believe we had the power to harness gravity, and access unlimited power from an empty cup of air in the 1940's, possibly after reverse engineering downed alien space craft like The Roswell Incident in 1947, or just from brilliant scientists like Nikola Tesla, and others who worked on the Manhattan Project. As well as believing that we couldn't reach the moon in 1969?

If we had the power to utilise Zero Point Energy, and control gravity so that we could fly around at incredible speeds in UAPs mistaken for aliens by many people back in the late 1940s, then why wouldn't we be able to reach the moon in such craft by 1969?

Well if you take the head of Lockheed Skunkworks, Ben Rich's word for it, then just before he died he claimed "We now have the technology to take ET home", and that the problem was that the technology was all locked up in off the books, Unacknowledged Special Access Projects, that are controlled by private MIC companies and not Government agencies. 

Also, if you listen to Steven Greer, he will tell you the history of how these private companies took full control of these projects, reversed engineered craft and owned the technology that came from it, without any Government oversight. 

Even the President and the head of the CIA were asking HIM, why they couldn't access these Unacknowledged Special Access Projects.

Well buckle up for what seems like a big own goal that is not making much media noise by Google. I guess it's due to their AI system talking to Putin before Trump that might be the reason. 

Anyway...

Recently at the Artificial Intelligence Journey 2023 Conference in Moscow. The Russian President was shown a photographic neural network created by Google, which brought into question the authenticity of Moon Landing snaps.

During the event, the Russian President was shown an AI analysis of the moon landing, with the claim that images of the US astronauts landing on the moon were not authentic. Putin and Nikolai Gerasimenko from Sberbank watched a Google neural network analysis of the moon landing, which suggested the possibility of synthetic photographs having been used.

President Putin, apparently just said “Very interesting,” when he was told by Gerasimenko, that the neural network “considered almost everything” in the photographs of the US landing on the moon to be fake. Also, most importantly, that "no bias" could be found because the analysis is based on Google’s neural network, an American system.

Neither the U.S. nor NASA have commented on the Google AI analysis of the Moon photos, or Putin’s response.

You can read an article about it here and NO, it is not from a Russian news site, it's an Australian site. I just had to use Yandex, a Russian based search engine to find it, as Google obviously doesn't want people to know about this news. 

What do I think?

I've gone back and forth over this issue in my head as new evidence is uncovered, also as NASA videos come out revealing that in designing the next rockets to take man into the Solar System, they can't get past Low Earth Orbit (LEO), due to radiation from the Van Allen belts, have come to the surface.

For instance in this video a NASA engineer talks about their next rockets, Orion, and how it has to do non human test flights through the Van Allen belts, so that scientists can study the data collected about the radiation and how dangerous it is. 

He says “We must solve these challenges before sending humans through this region of space”. 

Watch on YouTube.

If we went through this region of Space in what was paper thin protection in the 1960's, compared to todays spaceships, then you would expect them to know how to achieve this already. It sure would have helped if NASA hadn't decided to destroy all the technical data on how we achieved the Apollo flights. 

In a 2016 interview, veteran NASA astronaut Don Pettit made the following statement: 

"I’d go to the moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it’s a painful process to build it back again."

I have, like many, watched the back and forth between scientists and researchers who have debated shadows, stars not appearing in photos, flags waving on the Moon, background scenes used in Hollywood at the time, and other photos anomalies. 

Sometimes I hear something that seems convincing, but then I hear a valid rebuttal of the idea, so I have been very open on the subject. 

I have often wondered that if the Space Race was so important to win for the USA, then why didn't the scientists from the Manhattan Project that went on to work for the Nuclear Agencies and MIC companies, that seemed to control a lot of the hidden physics that UAPs are built around, help the Government in this endeavour. 

Why didn't they let NASA use a modern Zero Point Energy based system to get to the moon?

Then I always come back to the control mechanism that this planet is currently based upon, which people like Steven Greer are trying to break. 

The world is based on a Petro-Carbon economy, and the 0.1% of people at the top of the pyramids of power don't want us to have free energy as it would hurt their bank balance as well as their grip on the mechanisms of power. 

So a display of using such energy to get to the moon would have let the cat out of the bag, so to speak, and people would have started asking questions. Of course some of us did anyway, but a global display of this control over gravity without having to use rocket fuel to get to the moon would have been a too obvious display of the goodies they controlled. 

They didn't want normal people to be able to replace paying for Oil and Gas, and use free energy devices to heat their homes, and power their modes of transport.

There has been lots of debate over the Apollo missions, and proving that NASA actually managed to reach the moon, with little tests beforehand, and many failed unmanned attempts to land, and lift back off the moon, You can see a detailed debate with videos, photos, links here if you wish,

Also when there have been attempts to photograph or visit the Apollo lunar sites, either NASA or the US Government has stepped in to prevent it. The US Congress passed a law in 2020 declaring all six Apollo lunar landing sites national heritage sites and off-limits to any other nation or private space company.

NASA also imposed no-fly zones and ground-travel buffer zones to "protect and preserve the historic and scientific value of US government lunar artifacts", in 2012. 

In 2021, during a YouTube webinar, an official of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) unveiled two low-resolution photographs of the Apollo 11 and 12 landing sites reportedly taken by the Indian Chandrayaan-2 lunar exploration mission. These are currently the most detailed landing site photographs available, but skeptics have disputed their authenticity and origin.

However, the point that convinced me that we went to the Moon, was that I was informed by a video debunking conspiracies about the mission that thousands of people with telescopes all over the world, watched the trip happen with their own eyes. 

If I hadn't had heard that people watched the Apollo 11 rocket fly to the moon with telescopes, then I would have had more questions but then Apollo 8 managed to get to the moon, it just didn't have a moon lander.

Apollo 11 apparently manged to go to the moon with less computing power than a modern smart phone multiplied by a hundred thousand. They had less computing power than the first Spectrum and Amstrad PCs. The iPhone 11 has more than a million times computing power than Apollo 11's guidance computer which only had 74KB ROM and 4KB RAM. 

So the main question I want answered about NASA space missions is this. 

If we went to the moon in the 60s with less computing power than a modern day calculator. 

Then why can we not leave Low Earth Orbit (LEO) now?

Sure we can send non human Satellites, and James Webb & Hubble telescopes past LEO, but we can't for some reason place the International Space Station, or even attempt to send a test flight with humans aboard out of LEO.

Why? 

Surely since 1972 our technology has advanced a bit. The reason given by NASA, is that it cost too much money, £257bn (in todays money), to achieve the feat, and people have lost interest in Space.

However that is not really accurate. 

The recent rescue of NASA astronauts by Elon Musk's SpaceX rocket engaged the people, and there is enough talk about UAP's even in Congress, that if all the MIC companies with machines that could fly to the moon in minutes were made public. Then I think the people would be very engaged and interested.

However, that would never happen until the Petro-Carbon economy is overthrown, as the Globalists in control of possible Secret Space Fleets, Breakaway Civilisations, and the mining of asteroids for trillion dollars of rare minerals, don't want to risk losing the money they currently make from selling Oil and Gas to us.

However, even if we went to the moon, I have never believed the photos and film were real for the reasons listed below. I agree with Google's AI analysis of the photos, and no they are not the usual flag, shadows and stars arguments:

1. Prior to the manned Apollo 8 lunar orbiting mission in December 1968, NASA had not sent any animals through the Van Allen radiation belts. When the Apollo 11 mission went to the Moon, they did not know what effect the radiation from passing the belts, the strong Sun rays on the Moon, and walking on the lunar surface, would have on any camera film footage taken.

This was a recent excuse given by a NASA scientist on designing the next space flight to leave LEO, on why we currently can't do so. The effect of this radiation on human beings.

If they don't know the effect on humans now because for some strange reason NASA decided to destroy all the data needed to go back in the future. Then the question remains how did they manage it back in 1969? 

Even if we admit they did manage it in 1969. Then I want to know how would NASA know the effect on camera film or even the television signal sent back home from the Moon, passing through this strong radiation belt. 

It might have failed, or destroyed the film due to radiation, and it was untested until the actual event. 

Showing live footage to the world would have been a big gamble if NASA did not even know if the TV signal would reach Earth okay to be viewed live. It was a risk they could not take I suggest, which is why they only had one stream to a single TV, and they filmed the moon walk on a filmset before the actual launch. 

Whether they went to the Moon or not is moot in my argument, as I am only arguing that the footage and photos from the Moon were faked, and it seems a Google AI analysis of the footage agrees with me.

2. All the photos are beautifully taken on the way to the moon with a Hasselblad camera, and when on the lunar surface, the camera was mounted on a bracket on the chest of the astronaut’s space suit.

Astronaut Buzz Aldrin walks on the surface of the Moon near the leg of the lunar module Eagle during the Apollo 11 mission.

Neil Armstrong apparently took 120 pictures whilst on the Moon, and during the six Apollo missions, a total of 12 astronauts walked on the surface of the moon and took a combined total of around 25,000 photographs.

The question is how did they manage to take so many perfect pictures in the little time they spent outside?

On a podcast with people who had investigated it for years. I will always remember one researcher saying it was impossible for the 2hrs 15min on the surface to take as many camera shots as they did in so little time.

The maths just doesn't work. They just didn't have the time to take so many perfect pictures. How did they manage so many perfectly taken photos with their chest bound cameras, whilst experiencing weightlessness for the first time, and doing their other tasks?

How many camera shots were badly taken due to the experience of being on the lunar surface with gravity issues, and a chest bound camera unlike those we have on our smart phones today?

They would have been constantly taking pictures with their chest bound cameras with no time to pick up the 400kg of moon rocks they supposedly brought back home. 

However fake moon rocks have been uncovered, like the famous incident where a Dutch museum realised their rock was just petrified wood. 

"The Dutch national museum said Thursday that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood." 

Its amazing what Buzz Aldrin keeps finding in his sock drawer to auction off. 

3. Why did NASA force everyone to film one TV in their HQ for their coverage rather than just beam it worldwide?

That's why the original TV footage of the Moon landing is so grainy and such poor quality.

The BBC for instance, along with all other major news corporations covering the mission, literally had to point a camera at a TV where a single stream was being shown. Like me videoing my TV on my phone but using 1960s tech.

It would have made any conspiracy to hide the fake moon footage which could have been recorded months before the event so much easier.

They would have even been able to hide the lie from the staff working at NASA, who were all compartmentalised, none of them would have known if the footage being shown was live or recorded before the flight. 

4. The press conference with the astronauts after their return to earth and isolation period for "safety reasons"

I am not sure whether MK Ultra psychiatrist Jolyon West passed by for a visit at anytime, as the 3 astronauts look like silent stunned rabbits caught in the headlights, when they were finally famously interviewed. 

It is as if they are doped up on strong drugs, or hypnotised to act disinterested and not as if they just accomplished a great feat for the USA. 

Or were they just totally embarrassed because they knew they were total frauds sitting in front of the world's press, pretending they were heroes?

Watch on YouTube.

It is very strange behaviour I think for 3 people who should have been raving about their record breaking experience as the first people to walk on the moon.

5. The film maker Bart Sibrel, found NASA footage, not meant for us to see, that suggests even the TV stream of the Astronauts halfway to the moon on day 2 were actually still flying in LEO. 

He used this in his documentary "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon" that shows the astronauts in Low Earth Orbit pretending they were halfway to the moon. 

They did this by using a cardboard cutout on the window of the craft to make the earth look smaller as if they were halfway to the moon.

Also a CIA secret radio channel is heard telling them to wait 4 seconds before replying to a radio message. 

This is supposedly so it seemed like a longer radio delay, as if the ship was halfway to the moon and not still in LEO. 

You can watch that here if you want. 

Of course people have videos debunking the film but that is up to you to decide whether the Apollo 11 mission actually went to the Moon or not. 

I think they went, whether they did everything the video shown to one screen in NASA HQ happened or not I don't know. However, I think all the photos were staged, along with the video footage. 

In this regards, I agree with Googles AI analysis of the images from the mission. 

Google is part of the CIA, so I am basically agreeing with the CIA for once!

You might also find this recent interview with Bart Sibrel interesting. 

In it, he discusses the documentary, Google AI analysis of the photos, attempts on his life, killings of whistleblowers, deathbed confessions and more. 

Now if NASA did fake the moon landing, I don't know why didn't Russia blow the whistle on the fake voyage for PR purposes. 

However, apart from the usual theories you hear about this, maybe it was because the Soviets didn't want the USA to reveal that maybe Yuri Gagarin, wasn't actually the first person into space. 

In fact according to some people, he was just the first of about 10 Soviet astronauts that actually made it home alive.

There could probably be a few old Soviet rockets circling earth right now, with skeletons of Russian cosmonauts and dogs, that never made it back to the motherland.

Maybe once the USA had won the propaganda war, they gave up on their own attempts to land a man on the moon.

Or maybe just as they are doing now, and as JFK wanted until he was killed. Russia and the USA are still collaborating on space missions, NASA ones, and Globalist Dark Fleet Missions, that we just don't know the full details about.

Only the other week, a Russian spacecraft safely delivered an American astronaut Jonathan Kim and two Russian cosmonauts to the International Space Station (ISS). 

This has been going on for years, all through the US proxy war in Ukraine against Russia, and during periods of sanctions. It seems whatever else is going on, when it comes to Space, the USA and Russia are happy to cooperate.

This is of course ignoring any discussion on aliens, and the theory that we never went back to the Moon because we were warned to stay away, or agreements with aliens such as the Greada Treaty, President Eisenhower supposedly signed which allowed for an exchange of advanced technology for the aliens to abduct humans.

There is also the theory that the Breakaway Civilisation, that is controlled by a Globalist Cartel has it's own Space Fleet that uses advanced technology, that Lockheed Skunkworks Ben Rich admitted we could take ET home with, and is hidden from the global population.

The NASA project, run mostly by NAZI scientists, the USA brought over after WWII in Operation Paperclip, was just a propaganda project for us mere mortals. Whilst a Secret Cabal of Globalists, use the forbidden technology such as Zero Point Energy from Quantum Vacuums, to run their own space operations and work hand in hand with alien entities.

You can watch an interview I have with Gary McKinnon who the US tried for a decade to try and extradite for revealing an off-world Naval manifest for crew members not in the Navy.

Plus a before and after photo of a supposed alien spacecraft on the moon he found on US military computer systems. He apparently found a photo of a cigar shaped spacecraft on the moon, and then the same picture but with the spacecraft airbrushed out.

The USA definitely tried their best to lock him up forever, even waiting for the UK to change its extradition treaty before an endless court battle.

If he all he had done was use a simple to make port scanner to find open ports and blank admin passwords on Naval Base computers, as he claims, then he should have been awarded money for "ethical hacking", as they call it now, rather than the torment he went through. 

So back to my question. 

Why have humans not been able or willing to leave Low Space Orbit since the Apollo missions ended? 

When you ask Google why we haven't left LEO since the Apollo missions the main reason given is money and a loss in public interest. 

However if we are willing to let our government spend billions on never ending wars then I am sure the "First human space  flight out of Low Earth Orbit" would actually be quite a newsworthy event and I am sure Elon Musk's SpaceX, would love to take the reigns if NASA won't. 

So if Google's AI system really knows the answer, they are obviously hiding it from us peasants but it only confirms what I have long suspected about the photos from the Moon, they are fakes, whether or not we went there in 1969.

Thoughts?

By Dark Politricks

© 2025 - Dark Politricks

Trumps Pro Zionist War On Free Speech

Trump Supporters Should Not Be Cheering On The Detention of Mahmoud Khalil

By Dark Politricks

The definition of terrorism always changes, and seems to change between every US administration.

Remember the USA still had Nelson Mandela on a Terrorist watch list until 2008.

So Trump supporters, the question is why are you cheering the detention of a Palestinian, Mahmoud Khalil, if not because of your love of Zionism?

Mahmoud has been moved from New York, where his lawyers and family are to an ICE Detention centre, notorious for it's abuse of inmates. 

The liberty speakers outside the NYC court the other day said their was no logical reason for the move apart from making it harder for him to communicate with his lawyers and family. Plus it would be an easier place for a pro-Trump judge to deport him rather than the liberal enclave that is NYC.

As the reporter in the video says, the only claim being made against Mahmoud, is that his views clash with US National Foreign Policy. That Foreign Policy is obviously their unashamed support for a country they have armed and backed, during a year long genocide in Gaza.

Mahmoud is someone who worked for the UK Foreign Office in Lebanon, for protesting the attack on his own country by Europeans, who came and invaded it after World War 2. 

Those people were invaders. Invaders that the US recognised after forcing millions of Palestinians out of the north of their country, through mass murder, rape, and terrorist attacks on the British who had been controlling the land. 

The Palestinians called this a catastrophe, or in their language, the Nakba.

Hardly any of these European Jews can claim links to the small Jewish population who lived there 2500 yrs ago. They use a made up book of fables, the Torah, as there rationale for their invasion of Palestine. They honestly believe it's their land because their book of fables told them it was "promised to them by God".

If this is any form of legal basis of allowing a group of people united only by their religion, despite many Zionists being Atheists, from coming back to land they once lived in. Then the British should take back the USA as they once lived and controlled that land. 

In fact I would call the American war of Independence a British Civil war, just fought in the USA, as most participants were British on both sides.

The same case could be made that the Norwegians could claim parts of Britain because the Vikings once raided and controlled portions of it. They could use Thor as their God, and say he had promised them a "holy land over the sea".

Those "moral" people in Israel. Well, you should expect them to be moral if they are using GOD as their excuse for existing there, created a state on top of an existing population. 

These moral Israelis, have been ethnically cleansing Gaza and the West Bank, for over a year now. 

This is a real genocide going on in our time, and yet hardly anyone but "anti-Semites", and "Self Hating Jews", such as the excellent team at the Grayzone, seem to care about it going on. 

Is this Islamophobia, or brainwashing by the pro-Zionist media that exists in the West?

This is not an old genocide, such as the holocaust of WWII, but a real life mass murder of a nation going on right now, with US, UK and French and German backing. 

In fact even if you believe in the well rounded 6 million figure from the Holocaust, which means "Burnt Offering". Then you need to know that this number has been disputed by many, proven impossible by logic and technology, and even rounded down by the Auschwitz camp itself. 

In fact it's own sites home page claims that only 1.1 million people died there, and not all of them would have been Jewish.

Also, you need to understand that during the war, the Zionists had close links with NAZISM, with the first Haavana boat sending Jews there flying a Swastika and piloted by a NAZI captain. Also, that in the Torah, it says that when the Israelites return to their home, they will be 6 million light. 

I guess this was why that number was printed in WWI papers, like the one below from 1914, about the likelihood of 6 million Jews at risk of dying. I guess they settled on this well rounded figure, which you can go to jail for disputing in Europe, as the final death toll by Zionists.

Also, there is evidence Israel's stole nuclear material from the USA, and then they collaborated with the racist apartheid regime of South Africa, with the Vela Incident. This was when a nuclear test was detected but ignored, and brushed off by the USA, as it would have meant sanctions on Israel, as they knew South Africa was a long way from making it's own nuclear bomb.

They have been caught raping prisoners, assassinating doctors and journalists, killing babies, and preventing food, water and medicine into that region. 

The worst thing is that these "moral" soldiers as the IDF like to call themselves do though, is constantly upload their war crimes to social media, Telegram channels and TikTok. Videos of them laughing about killing babies, and games where the winner gets to lob a tank shell into a refugee camp full of people living in tents

Not exactly very moral acts. 

The UN allows the attack of the people who are illegally oppressing you, as Israel is doing to the Palestinians, especially in Gaza, this is what happened on Jan 6th.

Israel then filled the news with propaganda, and used exaggerated claims of horrific behaviour by Hamas, that has since been debunked. 

This article of mine is about the South African case brought against Israel for Genocide in Gaza, with evidence and testimony about the lies and sick quotes from Israeli government sources and their case against Israel's attack on Gaza.

All countries, including the USA, recognise the post 1967 war borders in Israel, these are based upon UN resolutions 242 and 338, apart from the countries who don't recognise Israel at all. Most of these are Arab states like Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.

The only formal borders of Israel are with Egypt and Jordan.

A Palestinian should be able to protest in favour of his own people and country.

If he has a green card and a recognised US citizen he should have 1st Amendment rights to free speech as well.

Did some ADL supporter or a Jew at Columbia University, just ring up the government and grass on Mahmoud?

Now, lets forget the Zionist grip on Trumps administration at the moment, despite the fact that if you check X, you will see much of Trumps base are anti Israel, and want the grip that AIPAC has over their Congress removed.

So Trump supporters. Let me ask you this.

Don't you remember that under Biden's administration that all of you Trump supporters were labelled domestic terrorists for stopping the steal, Jan 6th, anti COVID posts and questioning Dr Fauci?

It's tiring to say it but, "one man's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter."

As of yet I have not heard an actual crime that Mahmoud has committed be confirmed by the US, apart from as the above video shows, that his views do not align with the US Governments Foreign Policy. 

However, I think they will find if they polled the nation, that many peoples views do not align with the Trump Administrations foreign policy. 

I think many Democrats, who are pro-Ukrainian, do not have views that align with his peace plan, to stop the war. That is foreign policy. So it is a flimsy excuse and not a crime, all we get are allegations of support for the government of Gaza, which happens to be Hamas.

In case you forget, Hamas was elected by the people living there, after the US and Israel, wanted elections to be held in 2006.

They just didn't like the outcome of the election. Just as Democrats didn't like the outcome of the 2024 election.

Lets all remember what Biden's Administration did under the grounds of "National Security".

-Labelled Trump supporters as domestic terrorists

-Labelled anti-vaxxers as domestic terrorists. 

-Labelled people who attacked Dr Fauci as domestic terrorists. 

-Labelled people who questioned COVID as domestic terrorists. 

-Labelled the now Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard a US veteran and Democrat, a Russian Puppet with no evidence and put her on a terrorist watch list. 

-Stopped the ex UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter, from going to Russia for a conference, then raided his house, under national security grounds for speaking out on social media, that the actions of the Biden admin, would cause World War 3 due to the US involvement in Ukraine. 

-Attacked Tucker Carlson for interviewing Putin and Sergey Lavrov, and getting the opposing view of the Russo-Ukrainian war out to US citizens, who up until then had only been fed on anti Russian propaganda for years on MSM. 

We wouldn't have found out, without the latter interview that the USA, under Biden, was prepared to lose Europe in a nuclear war with Russia, over Ukraine.

So please Trump supporters, remember recent past history under Joe Biden's Presidency, and how you were treated under the grounds of National and Foreign policy, 

If you spoke the truth about Russia, you were labelled a pro-Russian stooge as I was, and put on banned reading lists and not allowed into the country anymore. 

So please don't pander to pro Israeli factions and Zionists, who want to drag you into a war with Iran. As that is your Governments direction, if they keep following their Foreign Policy, and Zionist friends. 

And, if a war does start between the US and Iran, how many of YOU are going to be against the Foreign Policy of the USA?

By Dark Politricks

© 2025 - Dark Politricks