Friday 30 September 2022

Am I going down the Google plughole of alternative sites?

Facebook Plugin Might Stop You Reading My Articles

By Dark Politicks

BS Detector List: Facebook Fake News Filters
Tonight I did what I used to do when my own server was up and running quite a lot, and that was search on Google for sites that were linking to me.

You can just put site: [sitename] into Google or many other search engines search box and it will return a list of sites that mention the site you have listed.

So I did a search for site: and had a peruse at my leisure to see what BS had been written about me. 

Of course I am a Russian Agent that pushes evil ex-commie propaganda on you all, that seems like a given from some of the sites I looked at. It must be due to me not pushing the "lets have a war with Russia" neo-con/neo-liberal line that seems to wash over much of the US governing elite at the moment.

Hey, I admit it. I don't want to burn to a crisp in a nuclear holocaust. I do apologise to any blogger out there that thinks I have a pro-Russian bias. I just don't believe Russia wants a nuclear war, and think you're very stupid if you do want one.

So many sites have had me on lists then their page disappears from the web but I can still prove I am on the list with Wikispooks if you go here to see the PropOrNot list of the most egregious offenders >>

Here is another site with my site on a list >

However, what really upset me is when I found my name on a list on a 911 conspiracy site such as It is using the same list I found on many other sites claiming I am a "useful idiot" or "Russian Disinfo Agent" just because I do things like stick up for Gaza, tell you the history of CIA drug smuggling, and dare tell the history of the Donbass before the war many MSN Sites believe started with Putin's invasion early 2022.  

However, I was writing about 9.11 inconsistencies and conspiracies back in the 2000's when I had free hosting at my company. Here are some articles, forget the dates, I have been moved from hosting company to server so many times they are meaningless.
Unfortunately, I posted an article on my site about a Russian missile called the sunbeam or sunburst or something I believe. It was a missile that could beat all US Aircraft carrier defences and one that skimmed across the ocean inches from the sea at Mach 2 to avoid detection. The US had tried to buy some from Russia but was refused only for Russia to sell some to China. 

Within an hour of the article going up my webmaster at work came over panicked with a copy of an email he had received. A Cease and Desist warning letter to take the article down ASAP, with a long list of US DOD departments at the bottom such as the US Army, US Airforce, US Marines etc etc. 

My webmaster honestly shat his pants and kept looking out of the windows for black helicopters waiting for Mossad to rope down and kill me in plain view. It was funny to watch but my site lost its free hosting and I ended up having to pay stupid money just to host my site on its own as on the server at work my blog was getting more visits than all the other company sites we hosted combined, and that was with me blocking 45% of all traffic from spambots, hack bots and brand bots that just crawl constantly trying to see if anyone is talking about them.

I just don't get why my little blog is on a list with big well-known sites such as, and to name just three. How did this professor find me, am I already on some sort of ban list so that they found me through that, who knows but I take it as given I am already being monitored somehow, from afar from the Australian ECHELON site, or maybe I need to peel back the sticking tape on my webcam so someone at GCHQ or MI5 can watch my lovely mug as I type?

There used to be a page that talked about a Facebook Plugin designed to warn users if they click on a link taking them to one of these 559+ websites. It was a 3-year-old article, and the old link doesn't show the article, but then again my Facebook page for this site has been removed, my main Twitter account blocked, and I have had social media sites and communities removed in the blink of an eye without any consultation before so who knows what the kind Samaritan who apparently complied the list thinks of me? 

It seems that the good egg who compiled the list is, Melissa Zimdars, an assistant professor of Communication and Media at Merrimack College. It is none other than she, who and I quote "compiled a list of the most egregious offenders".

I doubt she even knows who I am, however then again if I am on 2 different lists and can't get into the US, I am probably on some sort of no-fly list. I applied for a US visa and was denied, before 9.11 I had gone to Boston, USA twice within a year all with no problem, whilst working for a big International IT company.

If you get blocked by a subscription bar and don't want to be tracked or turn BRAVES sheilds down, or turn off ADblocker extensions you can do some simple client-side hackery in the DOM by removing classes on the element ("Open Developer Tools > Select The Element -> Edit it as HTML -> Remove Classes and inline styles until the block is gone and you can read the page).

Citing a report from some group called PropOrNot listing more than 200 web sites that supposedly pushed Russian propaganda routinely to more than 15 million Americans, the Post – without irony – declared that somehow constituted "scientific evidence" of Russian election-tampering!

So not only am I a pawn in the game being played between Russia and NATO/US with cover from other countries willing to break international law when they cannot get a UN resolution to invade a country, I am also part of the Russiagate conspiracy hoax that stopped Hillary Clinton getting into office. 

Well although I am happy to be considered worthy enough to stop a psychotic killer and war-mongering liar get into the Presidency, I didn't do much apart from print the truth back then, something that was written off as Russian disinfo, and could have swayed the election Trumps way but all big social media sites were blocking what we all now know was a real story of corruption e.g the news on Hunter Bidens laptop.

Apparently, despite Russiagate being debunked a hundred and one times, and Clinton officials and lawyers being interviewed and arrested by the FBI for making up false claims, in which fake info based on rumours was given to ex UK spy Christopher Steele, who then compiled a dossier that they then used to "prove" Donald Trump was a Russian agent with a love of prostitutes and pee parties, people still believe this narrative. This is why I have my site to give people the facts other sites don't.

However it has later come out that due to her narcissistic temperament the "Russia did it", claim was literally made up when Hillary Clinton found out she had lost to Trump, someone she actually helped persuade to run for President as she thought she could easily beat him and carry on the Obama administration that helped bring slave markets back to Libya and funnelled guns from there to Syria, and al-Qaeda and ISIS terrorists to try and other throw President Assad.  

This is another site with my domain mentioned multiple times, the backlinks don't work as the people are obviously copying and pasting from other sources, and don't bother putting the http:// in front of my site's name to get you here, but the SEO gains would have been nice seeing I am being shadow banned and articles that used be at the top of Google are slipping down and down the page.

Well, to be honest, I feel honoured to be considered a threat somehow to weak minds, Melissa. It seems I am worthy enough to be on this list along with such evil doers as the Drudge Report, Russia Today, and of course the rabid, evil points of view from Plus of course, I get to say I am on a ban list with Alex Jones, one of my first conspiracy heroes back in the day he used to rant and rave at the camera like a loon in need of Largactil LOL.

Sometimes I just feel that if a site is not on a list like the ones I have shown you they are not doing enough to fight the establishment narrative and give people an opposing point of view to consider. Surely if you host a show called Redacted, which I do watch, you should be on a ban list along with me, Alex Jones, Natural News, and Come on what does it take for new shows that get more viewers than MSN outlets that dare speak the truth about the Nord Stream pipe bombings to get put on our naughty list?

I also found this list of raw site URLs which had me labelled down for "bias" and "conspiracy". Well I don't know what my bias is, but if it's that I am against a 3rd nuclear war, hate fake current and historical narratives and I'm not a "co-incidence theorist" then yes those labels are correct.

It seems this core list has been copied, and amended in some cases across numerous blogs claiming to have a list of "fake news sites", or "sites to be careful reading", whatever that means. If it's that you might find an alternative and possibly more correct view of an event than those spouted by the mainstream media outlets then yes.

I did find it amusing on the site to find under the category "State Run" just the two sites from the countries the US is currently pushing its propaganda for war with, Russia Today and Iran's Press TV.

What I want to know is where was the BBC? You cannot get a more state run organisation than the BBC, a news broadcaster that has the backing of the government in forcing all live TV viewers to fork out over £150 per year to pay for a licence fee that funds the BBC's reporting.

Therefore it is something I expect, to be labelled a conspiracy theorist just because I don't believe in physics that says an aluminium plane cannot fly at 550mph just inches above the ground and punch it's way through 3 rings of re-enforced concrete as supposedly happened at the Pentagon on 9.11. If I threw an empty can of coke at my bedroom wall would you expect it to just bounce off or go directly through it as if it had been the weight of a rock with some Semtex attached?

Oh and you must call me anti-Semitic for daring report what many US news stations did on the day of 9.11 about the "dancing Israelis", flicking lighters and positioned where no-one else would know to be, filming the first plane hit the Twin Towers. Known Mossad agents who were released by the FBI without charge and went onto an Israeli TV show to claim that they were, "just documenting the event".

And I must be a "hate speech" site for daring to talk about how Israel is assassinating hundreds of Palestinians at the fence that divides them from their old stolen homes. Or how the Mossad stole British passports to use in their assassination of a Hamas leader in Dubai, or show the YouTube video recording of two IDF soldiers shooting 9 bullets into the back of an injured US citizen, Furkan Dogan, on their high seas attack on the Mavi Marmara.

Then of course I must fall into the most evil category at all as well. No-one can point out that Auschwitz itself has decreased the number of people that died within it's rebuilt walls from 6 million down to under a million without being a blatant liar and holocaust denier. I guess the people running the camp, and the historians who have lowered the number from a round perfect 6 million, a number that is stated in the Torah as the number of Jews who must die before they can return to Israel, must fall into the same category as me?

So what do to if these blogs and sites are correct, and my site is on these lists to be considered so dangerous as to warn anyone visiting that it's not a reliable source?

Well what we need is a real "Alternative News" search engine. I did attempt creating one on my old site, I basically just returned Google's results as does through a proxy server to remove all the trackers, and then I had a list of sites such as the BBC, MSBC, CNN and other "authoritative news sources" that I removed from the results.

However that server is not running anymore and I doubt anyone out there is going to create a real #altnews search engine. I tried creating one using Googles Search Engine tools that used to be at the top of the page but then Google took it down, along with all my ad revenue from them and I am left with nothing.

I can only try my best to use what I can, I am probably on the way out in my 40's but with several chromic severe conditions that have seen me spend a week per month in the local hospital for the last 3 months, and a month stint in August last year and another week in June 2001, all after I took that evil AstraZ jab. I didn't want it but my parents live local and wouldn't even see me unless I took an LFT test and sent them a picture of the result. 

However they were nice enough to give me COVID last month, and whilst in hospital for this months stint (I only got out two days ago), I was in a bay where everyone got COVID and moved. I was the only one that didn't get it probably due to having anti-bodies still in me. 

Still I had to ask for a test despite the whole bay having COVID apart from me. I had to really kick off, go through 3 nurses and a matron and demand one from a doctor just to get a negative result. The new hospital policy says you only get a test if you are showing symptoms well when I had COVID my temp was 34.1C, not exactly steaming, and plus it takes days to show symptoms anyway. 

I just cannot believe last month when I was in hospital they were trialling a new computer system called EPIC where QR codes were scanned before any meds given out and this month they were already calling it an EPIC failure and printing everything out on paper as it was easier to use. 

Hey, what's another £20bn down the drain trying to modernise the NHS and put everything on computer. The last £20bn system was a mess and never used, and this one will be the same. We would have got a better return sending it over to Ukraine for the Russians to blow up on delivery but then that is another post! Go have a read, I have a lot of coverage of the Donbass war on this site, and share it with your friends. 

One of mine thought that the BBC would have told him that the Americans had blown up Nord Stream 1 & 2 pipelines if it were true, but that's what I am here for folks, to tell you the evil dirty truth that many go around all their lives in ignorant bliss. 

What I would do be a dumb sheep again and not know the things I do!

I hate to say this but please donate if you can, I am doing this on my own, without funding and I am on ban lists and no fly lists for taking the time to write these articles.

By Dark Politricks

© 2020 Dark Politricks

Thursday 29 September 2022

Who Benefited From Blowing Up Nord Stream1 and Nord Stream2?

Who Caused A Massive Natural Disaster By Blowing Up Russian Gas Lines

By Dark Politricks

Update: October 30th 2022:
It seems that the UK has been found out as the country who helped blow up the pipe lines. Apparently using Israeli Pegasus malware, Russia bugged Liz Truss's iPhone and saw her text Sec of State Antony Blinken a minute after the attack saying "It's done", the Russians have directly accused the UK of blowing up the German and Russian gas pipelines, and despite investigations by Sweden who won't comment on grounds of "National Security" and Germany, who has forbidden their MP's from asking questions about it.
It seems we were the culprits of a massive terrorist plot that will put Germany into recession and may cause hundreds of thousands of people to die from the cold this and the following winters.

George Galloway on the subject:


Update: October 10th 2022:
At the beginning of October, Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to resume gas supplies to Europe through the intact part of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.

"The ball is in the EU's court. If they want to, then the taps can be turned on and that's it," he said in a speech at an energy forum in Moscow.

Germany, however, said it would not take Russian gas via the Nord Stream 2 pipeline that has become a flashpoint in the Ukraine crisis.

Asked if Berlin would rule out the use of Nord Stream 2, German government spokeswoman Christiane Hoffmann said, "Yes."

More info > 

I had an argument with a friend today over who blew up the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines the other day. I tried explaining to him Russia wouldn't destroy a pipeline they spent billions on when they could just turn it off with a switch at Gazprom HQ.

However, like most people he believed the western propaganda that the Russians did it, although he thought Ukraine might despite not having the technical know-how.

When I tried telling him it was most likely the Americans he said no, why would they, what do they have to gain plus the funniest line, "the BBC would have said about it in the news" (as well as ITV and Sky), that's like asking for CNN to do a 60 minute hit piece "sponsored by Phizer" on the Opioid epidemic they were fined $2.3bn for criminal and civil allegations that the company illegally promoted uses of four of its drugs. 

The USA Planned War in Europe and the Energy Crisis

Despite denials, a Swedish news agency revealed a document signed RAND Corporation, a think tank linked to the US Department of Defense, outlines a strategy for “Weakening Germany and strengthening the U.S.” It says there is an “urgent need” for an influx of resources from outside to maintain the American economy, “especially the banking system”. A key objective is to destroy the cooperation between Germany and Russia which is seen as the greatest economic and political threat to the United States. 

Their plan was to draw both Russia and Europe into war with the primary goal of destroying the German economy. The green parties in Europe were manipulated by American strategists and were part of the trap. The benefits of US-based companies having less competition on the world market, logistical advantages, and the outflow of capital from Europe. The US economy would benefit by $7 to $9 trillion dollars. You can read the document here and you can see how US exports of gas have gone up this year to Europe as Russian gas is stopped. 

You can see how US gas exports to the EU from the USA below and how they have increased as the year, war and suicidal sanctions on Russia have increased.

And here you can see which European countries relied on Russian gas for power, heat, and industry below.

To be honest, as a UK citizen who apparently doesn't get any gas from Russia, as we have North Sea oil and pipes from Norway, I am wondering why our energy bills are rising so fast unless it's price gouging by energy companies, many who have reported record profits this year. If that is the case then there should be a windfall tax on those companies to help pay for the increased price rise in energy or legal action against those companies to prevent unnecessary rises from even occurring.

Of course, this also fits with the Davos World Economic Forum plan to proceed with the Great Reset, get us off fossil fuels, replace boilers at home with useless and more expensive water heaters, constant surveillance, digital currency, and the banning of cash the use of a Social Credit system, instant fines coming from bank accounts, work from home, less driving or flying abroad - unless it's onboard your own private jet to Davos of course.

The main thrust of the forum is global control. Free markets and individual choice do not stand as the top values, but state interventionism and collectivism. Individual liberty and private property are to disappear from this planet by 2030, and who can forget their famous slogan that "We will own nothing, and he happy".

Ecosystem Damage By Destruction of Nord Stream pipelines

Despite the pipes being turned off on the German side, they were full of gas and the explosions caused massive leaks of Methane into the water creating a massive unnatural disaster for the ecosystem where the popes were based.

So who caused these explosions? Of course, western fingers pointed at Russia and Russia pointed at the US who had 2 ships seen near the site of the explosions only hours before they occurred. I am pretty sure that if Germany sent divers down into the mess in the sea and collected scraps from the explosive device or torpedo used that they would find English writing on US weapons. Would they keep quiet and let the US carry on destroying their economy and freezing their population or would they dare speak out and cause a rift within NATO?

Recent leaks of a Rand Corporation document, which Rand denies, show that the USA has had a long-term plan going back to the early 2000's to wean the EU off Russian gas as well as wanting to de-Industrialise the powerhouse of Europe, Germany, by getting it involved in a war with Russia and having them cut their gas off.

Why Would The USA Attack Their Major EU Allies Infrastructure and Cause Economic Chaos?

USA world dominance is a “primacy,” aim which drives Washington, however, this is not possible without control of Eurasia and that’s not possible without control of Ukraine by pushing Russia out and controlling the governments in Moscow and Beijing and it now seems Europe as well. What U.S. leaders still view as Russia’s “imperial ambitions” are in Moscow seen as imperative defensive measures against an aggressive West.

For the USA to want to cause major pain, and probably thousands of deaths this winter by destroying their major trading partner, the EU, by making them cold and powerless during winter is a sick idea for a supposed ally to do to us, but it's not unexpected, they have been talking about it since Condoleezza Rice was State Secretary. 

Plus here| we have Joe Biden talking about how if Russia invaded Ukraine the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline would not go ahead as he had ways to stop the pipeline. 

This is a plan they have played out since the US coup in Ukraine in 2014 and the civil war in which over 16,000 people of the Donbass region of Ukraine, many parts who have just voted to join Mother Russia were killed by Neo-NAZI thugs and thugs from prisons such as murderers and rapists, who were let out to help booster the Ukrainian foreign legion. 

It has also been conjectured  that show US soldiers invading ground in the north, as well as English and US "mercenaries" who were executed on the orders of Putin, by Russia's Spetznas Special Forces after being caught laying British explosives in mines from southern Russia to the Ukrainian city of Kharkion, including the famous ex SAS soldier and writer Andy McNab

There were also the trials and death sentences passed down to ex British soldiers Aiden Aslin, 28 and 48-year-old Shaun Pinner. There has also been the suspected capture of an ex Canadian General who is thought to be currently held in Moscow. He was thought to have been captured in the Azovstal steel works trying to escape, and it is the supposed reason NATO sent in helicopters to try and rescue him with no luck.

"If Russia invades...then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.
Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson said that the leaks were likely caused by “a deliberate action” but “not an attack against Sweden.” Other Western countries and NATO have echoed that conclusion.

German, Danish, and Scandinavian security authorities are now examining the leaks and trying to identify their cause, according to the German Economy Minister Robert Habeck, who added that Europe can protect its critical infrastructure.

Tucker Carlson -Why Russia Would Not Lose Its Leverage Over Europe By Destroying Pipelines

So what has really happened by these explosions, probably caused by the USA?

Here is a quick list:
  • An environmental disaster that will contribute to climate change due to methane gas leaks.
  • The stoppage of any possibility Germany will be able to keep the lights on and citizens heated during a cold winter.
  • An economic attack by the USA on its NATO allies and major trading countries just to preserve US hegemony.
  • The stopping of leverage Russia has over Europe by being able to stop and start the flow of gas at any time. 
  • The destruction of billions worth of expensive time and money building a pipeline and the possible collapsing of Germany from a major world exporter to a farming nation as it was just after WW1 & WW2. Let's hope there is no move to the right by all the angry Germans as we all know where that leads if a populist leader comes along and recognises the American duplicity and lies they have been told over the years.
  • Huge power bill increases if replacement power cannot be found quickly and imported into the EU.
  • The possible deaths of thousands of people across Europe especially if it is going to be a very cold winter. I would call this genocide as depending on how many poor, old, and homeless people die it is justified for Germany to want at least compensation, maybe even revenge if they fall out of line with the USA and especially if the EU collapses.

Putting the Pieces Together - Redacted

Please watch this segment of Redacted which talks about the attacks on the pipelines. It is shown on YouTube at 9pm GMT, 4pm EST every day if you want to join the thousands now watching one of the biggest independent shows which has bigger viewing figures than many MSM news programmes.

So if any of you have any other theories of how this attack happened then please let me know in the comment section.

By Dark Politricks

© 2022 Dark Politricks

Thursday 22 September 2022

Are We Just Days Away From World War III?

Putin offers Donbass Referendums To Become Part Off Russia

By Dark Politricks

Sorry I haven't been about much but I have been in and out of hospital constantly and might have to go  in again. Anyway if NATO is as stupid as Ukraine then we won't have to worry about it.

For those of you who missed the whole speech, you can watch it here on Redacted, a channel you should all subscribe to and watch for the news the MSM ignores. For full episodes scroll to the 30 minute mark as the rest is a 30 min collection of redacted news and CIA officers revealing how they made lies up about wars etc. It's basically to give YouTube time to get all their notifications out. However, this is just a clip about Putin's full speech, which has the history to back it up.

I bet most of you only watched a few seconds clip of Putin the other day, laying out how he has gone to the Duma to change the operation from a Special Military Operation to a full war with NATO. He is calling up 300,000 reserve forces which will make just over half a million in action. Remember Russia only started this with 200,000 

Putin's Warning of World War III and the referendums in Donbass

Once these Donbass regions and breakaway republics who have been under constant shelling by neo-Nazis and Ukrainian troops for 8 years vote, and if they vote to join Russia, then the new rules the Duma passed will come into play.

The new law from 2020 outlines four scenarios in which Moscow would order the use of nuclear weapons, two of them new and involving potential instances of nuclear first-use. 

The established protocol permits use when an enemy uses nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction on Russia or its allies, and in situations when conventional weapons "threaten the very existence of the country."

The two new provisions include cases in which the government receives "reliable information" that a ballistic missile attack is imminent or enemies damage the nation's critical and military facilities to the degree that the ability to retaliate with nuclear weapons is disrupted.

Therefore if these 4 regions of the Donbass become part of Russia then any attack on them, or the shelling of the biggest nuclear power station in Europe by NATO and Ukraine will mean that these new rules come into play.

Whilst the head of NATO, Norwegian ex-PM Jens Stoltenberg, is spouting all kinds of rubbish about Russia failing in Ukraine, hopefully, the military council that makes the decisions is wiser. They can see the trap that Russia is laying out for them, which changes everything.

Russia has promised security for the regions to vote over the weekend whilst Zelenskyy and his Right Sektor NAXIs are pushing laws through that if anyone votes they could spend from 5 to 10 years in prison, and even be outcast from a series of jobs for 50 years!

I thought the USA was all about democracy and freedom, it's what they parrot all the time when they want to invade a country to steal its oil. We only have to remember how they allowed Kosovo to become independent after bombing Serbia (the wrong people), with the help of bin-Laden and al-Qaeda and the terrorist group the KLA, to see their double standards.

So if these regions attack the newly Russian Donbass areas, they could be in for a shock, so could all NATO countries as Putin has made it pretty clear he knows it is NATO that is fighting the war down to the last Ukrainian and that US real time satellite images are being passed to Ukrainians so that they can attack Russian positions.

However after the full mobilisation of 600,000+ Russian troops, who are not running away on one-way tickets out of Russia as the west has claimed. They are ex-soldiers and they will not be deployed on the front line.

What will happen if Ukraine carries on shelling innocent people in markets and civilian areas? As this full episode of Redacted shows, it has interviews with Scott Ritter, ex-Iraq weapons inspector and Marine, plus Eva Bartlett, an independent journalist who unlike CNN or the BBC actually goes to the war zones she writes about.

As they are interviewing her just blocks from where 4 people were killed by Ukrainian shelling earlier in the day, you can actually hear shells being fired. The Ukrainians like the Israelis, like doing double taps. 

They shell a civilian area, kill and injure a load of people, wait a while until the ambulances turn up, and then shell again hoping to destroy those ambulances. I suggest everyone should follow her on YoutTube and Telegram for up-to-date information from her.

Please click this link to watch a video of Ukrainian forces attacking ambulances and civilians. YouTube won't let me embed it as it's too violent.

Now for the main video with interviews with Eva Bartlett and Scott Ritter who reckons now that this is a war not a Special Military Operation that hundreds of tanks will just roll through Ukrainian lines and spread out killing everyone as the Russian air force which has hardly been used will be attacking Ukrainian areas, HQs, even civilian areas as the US/UK did in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Remember to scroll to 30 minutes into the video to get to the start. The first two pieces are with Scott and Eva, you don't have to watch news about Trump, and Dr Fauci finally admitting lockdowns caused harm to children and businesses.

I have set the video to start at 30 minutes but if YouTube won't let me embed it you can go here to watch it and I fully suggest everyone does as well.

Let's just hope NATO tells Ukraine to stop killing innocent people and they stop attacking Russia after the referendum which will undoubtedly result in the regions joining Russia as that will just lead to Armageddon

Please share and spread this article.

By Dark Politricks

© 2022 Dark Politricks