Israel is a terrorist state. Do the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?

Israel is a terrorist state but do the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?

By Dark Politricks

I am re-posting this article from a couple of years ago as the circumstances of Israel attacking Gaza and Hamas launching attacks on Israel is again repeating itself yet again. It is a cycle that has continued since Hamas was born, or rather created by Israeli intelligence to split the Palestinians into two warring factions, as Fatah / PLO were the dominant political force before Hamas, and although Hamas control Gaza after an election years ago, Fatah continue to reign in the West Bank, although a corrupt and weak state if it could even be called one.

I am against all terrorism, and I think Hamas's attack on 7th October 2023 went too far killing innocent people when they should have just concentrated on their enemy, the IDF. How they were able to cross into Israel so easily with so many men and weapons and carry out their massacre is a question the war mongering evil Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, needs to pay a price for allowing Israel to be caught asleep, and allow Hamas to attack so easily.

However when Israel talks about terrorism, and terrorist attacks they forget how the country was formed. Israel was created through terrorism, with Israeli terrorist groups killing first British soldiers and then massacring Palestinians and forcing them to flee from their homes.

The "plan" this time, in response to Hamas's attack, was for Israel to ethnically cleanse Gaza, forcing all 2 million Palestinians into refugee camps in Egypt. Egypt knows this and this is why they are preventing any Palestinians escaping through their Rafa route into Gaza. Israel doesn't want a two state solution, the growth of illegal settlers proves this as they are making it impossible for a viable Palestinian state to be born. 

The only true solution is a secular Israel with Palestinians and Jews living side by side. However the fervently racist Jews who honestly believe in their magic book, and that they lived in Israel thousands of years ago being God's chosen people, need re-education and some lessons on logic if this is to work. Either these racists need to be removed somewhere away from the Arabs they currently harass on a daily basis, chanting racist songs, mocking the deaths of Mohammed and Jesus, spitting at passers by and even throwing rubbish and bottles of urine onto their market stalls from stolen Palestinian homes above, or some two state system needs to be concocted to prevent these racists attacking Palestinians. 

These Jewish supremacists need to be removed to the north of Israel if one state will work, as its these super racist Jews who hate Christians and Muslims that are filling the current Knesset Government and always call for extermination of Palestinians, want the whole land to themselves and have no thought about launching a war that kills thousands of children.

Anyway here is the article - Israel was born out of terrorism, to claim they are now being threatened by it is hypocritical, Israel IS a terrorist state.

.........

As Israel carries on it's "defence" of it's people by blowing up news organisation buildings and stealing any photos that could contain incriminating images, as well as force people out of their family homes to give over to Israeli's with no chance to take all their belongings I have to ask - why does no-one ever ask the US President who always says "Israel has a right to defend itself" whether the Palestinians have a right to defend themselves?

Surely a people under illegal occupation, in which they have been deserted by all their old Arab friends now in bed with Israel and the US, have a right to defend themselves from being annihilated whenever there is an election due or Bibi Netanyahu is about to appear in court?

This is the sentiment of the illegal settlers now taking more Palestians homes, and creating "facts on the ground" to prevent a viable 2 state solution. They see Palestinians as snakes as one Knesset member, Ayelet Shaked once called them.

What these racists don't realise is that the tide is turning against their evil barbaric torture of a whole people. More people in New York, once a staunch pro-Israei ally, is now seeing New Yorkers protest in favour of the Palestinians despite the biased news they recieve from CNN, FOX and MSNBC. Even politicians who are usually all sucking on the teat of AIPAC money have stood up in Congress and in public to defend the Palestinians, something unheard of during the wars against GAZA in the eary 21st century.

They have created so many "facts on the ground" that a two state solution is almost now impossible. So because the rest of the world with a conscience won't let Israel destroy a whole people despite the US giving them a blank cheque to basically do so, therefore there will be only one solution left in the end. A one state, non Jewish, non Islamic, secular state from the sea to the river that both people's will have to learn to live in.

Rashida Tlaib, a Palestinian-American representative of Michigan, also delivered a tearful address to Congress. Speaking of the atrocities that Palestinians face, she questioned the US government’s “unconditional support” of Israel. Recalling how police shot rubber bullets and gas at protestors in Ferguson, Bush said she learned then that “the same equipment that they [the police] used to brutalize us is the same equipment we send to the Israeli military to police and brutalize Palestinians”.

Bernie Sanders called on the Biden administration and fellow lawmakers to “no longer be apologists for the right-wing Netanyahu government and its undemocratic and racist behavior”.

If the United States is going to be a credible voice on human rights on the global stage, we must uphold international standards of human rights consistently, even when it’s politically difficult. We must recognize that Palestinian rights matter. Palestinian lives matter. This comes after an expected weak position taken by Biden in which he said that "Israel has a right to defend itself" - what about Palestinians? 

Do they not also have a right, even a duty seeing they are imprisoned by a country igorning international law, to fight back against their plight?

Remember Israel was born out of terrorism, Israeli terrorism, massacres of Palestinians, and before that, the British Soliders that controlled the Palestinian Mandate.

The smouldering ashes of the King David Hotel blown up by Israeli terrorists in the 40's

So when the Israeli's were "building" their nation by using terrorism to "create facts on the ground" in the late 40's by massacring the Palestinians and forcing them from their homes, the world still stood back and did nothing. There were a few measly wars defeated by the US armed Israeli military from ex Palestinan allies such as Eygpt, Syria and Jordan who have now fallen by the wayside.

This of course caused more massacres, heads chopped off and of course the famous bombing of the King David Hotel, pictured above, which was the British HQ in Palestine at the time. Multiple Presidents and Prime Ministers can find their roots in the terror gangs that pushed the British out of Palestine and let them go on a murderous rampage.

There used to be a video on here by Blackstone Intelligence covering this matter but obviously it has now been taken down. However if been reading my site you will know I have had many historical documents on here related to the, breaches of International law such as the illegal piracy of the Mavi Marmara in international waters where a US citizen was shot 9 times in the back, caught on camera, but hardly mentioned in the US news as it would "embaress an ally".

The same sort of logic that President Johnson used when Israel tried a false flag attack on the USS Liberty, flying US flags, and overhearing their massacres of Eygptians, Johnson almost nuked Eygpt because he believed the lie that it was that country that had attacked the ship. Survivors and Israeli pilots overheard on radio telling their commanders that the ship was American told a different story altogether. Twice planes sent by nearby US ships were ordered back by Defence Secretery McNamara that could have helped the struggling ship.

I have a very famous talk by the ex Zionist turned Christian, and therefore anti-semite or self hating Jew,  Benjamin Freedman, who gave a very famous speech that put a very different spin on the reasons for WW1 and WWII. You can read the transcript and listen to it here.

We should also all know by now that the Rothschilds control most things related to money, pulling their puppets in parliaments and state houses all over the world. They also run most of the central banks in the world where they can print money on worthless paper, lend it to the government, and our taxes go to paying back these usury loans.

However there modus operandi has always been to make money from war. They lend loans to both sides and then collect reparations from the loser and the payback from the winner.

Israel and Zionism is a Rothschild operation, created between the British who were fighting the Ottoman Empire in WWI and Germany who was winning the World War 1. Germany offered to call the war off with no reparations, lets just all go home and forget about it, and they were the side winning. It was a no lose situation for the soldiers, but not for the bankers.

The Rothschild's didn't like this as it meant no money from reparations and they went to the British Government and promised them that they could get the USA into the war and win it. However in return they wanted some form of document that gave them Israel.

The famous Balfour agreement was a document sent to Lord Rothschild that promised to create a land for Zionist Jews if they brought the Americans into the war and in 3 months after the German offer to call the war off there was a total turn around in the USA who wanted to stay out of European wars. Most of the American press actually supported the Germans .

A false flag attack on the British ship the Lusitania, which was carrying Americans to Liverpool from New York orchestrated by the First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, got the Americans so riled up they wanted revenge and joined in on the war and beat the Germans.

When the Jews started flocking into Palestine they committed mass murders, massacres and drove hundreds of thousands of Palestinians out of their homes.

The rules of war say that refugees must be able to return to their homes but Israel, who had lost about 250,000 - 500,000 people in concentration camps, became the NAZI's who had persecuted them. Killing and murdering British and Palestinians until the Brits left and Israel was created. They are like the sex offender who was abused themselves as a kid, just passing on the condition down their lineage..

Israel seems to forget that International law was created due to their treatment by the NAZI's in WWII. However since the treaties signed in the 40's Israel has been run like a terrorist state, massacring refugees in camps like Sabra and Shatila in Lebanon which ex Israeli PM Ariel Sharon as defence Minister at the time was found responsible for.

However this was far from the only time Israel has committed war crimes and breached international law always with the US protectinng them from world comdemnation by vetoing any security council resolution that comes to a UN vote. The most recent vote was blocked the other day, the Council drafted a statement calling for a ceasefire, but the statement was vetoed by the US. You can watch the actual debate here.

Of course this all goes back to 19th century Rothschild Zionism which has used the Jewish people as a tool to get their way in the Middle East. Don't you find it funny that you can debate any historical fact but the only one that is not in dispute is that 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust ("Burnt Offering" - in Hebrew). 

This is a fact that cannot be argued about, and doing so would get you jailed in most European countries. You can't say only 5 1/2 million died it must be is a perfect 6 million Jews that died. Was the Holocaust an offering to their God to allow their self fullfilling prophecy to succeed in getting the Jews back to Israel?

Remember the quotes during the war, when Germany offered to sent Hungarian Jews to Israel instead of the work/death camps.

"One Cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland"

"When they asked me, couldn’t you give money out of the United Jewish Appeal funds for the rescue of Jews in Europe, I said, ‘NO!’ and I say again ‘NO!’ … one should resist this wave which pushes the Zionist activities to secondary importance."

Yitzhak Gruenbaum

After the creation of the Israeli state, the Stern Gang and Irgun Israeli terrorists, who killed so many Palestinians, British, American and other nationalities in their fight for independence all became members of the IDF. 

So the IDF is the Jewish army and it's based on terrorists. In fact the first leader of Israel was the head of a terrorist group and there have been 3 Presidents or Prime Ministers who were in these terrorist gangs. I wonder if that is the reason the IDF is so callous and acts like it does?

There is too much too go into this subject without being called a racist, anti-semite or have Hasbara and BOT haters in the comment section.

However history is history and it repeats itself over and over.

Remember you can be a Jew and not Israeli or Zionist and you can be a Zionist and not a Jew or an Israeli Zionist atheist.

The politicians call for the mothers to be killed so that they can't spawn any more Palestinian "snakes" and the racist language in the Knesset is appalling.

Remember if you agree Israel is a terrorist state, causing false flag attacks to blame on Muslims like 9.11 or the USS Liberty or the Lavon Affair where they bombed Brits and Americans in Eygpt to blame on Muslims then you have to be scared that they have nukes, especially when you read the Samson Option.

This was a policy of aiming nukes at Russia and Europe in case they were overrun by Muslims so they could take the whole world down with them, terrorists or rational players in a dangerous area of the world terrorising the Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese?

They commit assassinations overseas, killing innocent Iranian scientists just in case they were working on a nuclear bomb, kill peaceful protesters on the Mavi Marmara in international waters like pirates, threaten the world with nuclear annihilation, and they have had many, many massacres of the Gazan people who have just had their only lifeline of food cut off by the terrorist state.

Please comment carefully, I have nothing against non racist Israeli's and deplore terrorism whether it comes from Gaza or Tel Aviv, I just want a peaceful end to this sore on our international conscience. Just please do not call me an anti-Semite, which is the usual tactic to discredit someone attacking Israeli foreign policy, as I have nothing against Jews, just the Zionist State Of Israel when it breaks international law and does not keep it's part in treaties signed by both parties.

By Dark Politricks

© 2021 Dark Politricks

Havana Syndrome - Excuse For CIA to Finally Invade Cuba - Or A Real Weapon?

Is the CIA Making Up Reason To Invade Cuba?

By Dark Politricks

Hopefully if you are regular visitor you visit my Twitter #HashTag newspaper, either from a link on Twitter, or just  by visiting the site. If you have JavaScript on it's just above my #Altnews Search Engine, the search engine that will ONLY bring you news from the sources the establishment does NOT want you read, including this blog of mine somehow!

If you want a direct link to it to open it all up in a new browser window its > https://paper.li/darkpolitricks.

Now today there was an article from Reuters called "CIA probe of 'Havana syndrome' to be led by Bin Laden search veteran -source". Now I know the CIA has wanted to invade Cuba for over half a century when all the rich were kicked out of the country and their casinos and plantation's re-appropriated to the people under Fidel Castro in his Communist revolution.

Please don't think that I am going to do a spiel about how good Communism is, but when it comes to Cuba, they are having a hard time due to US Foreign policy. Not only does the US have multiple trade embargoes on the island, including complicated blockades that prevents certain goods like medical equipment, much needed during the COVID outbreak from getting to them, but anything with more than 10% US parts inside it has to go through US law.

You can read about the nuances of the laws that let the US decide what can and cannot get to Cuba here on this, "Fact Checker" site. However a quote from that site explains that the blockades and other laws are there because of this reason:

“It’s really to favour U.S. farmers and agricultural interests. Cuba was a very important market for U.S. farmers,” ... “So even though the sanctions generally prohibit trade, there are some exceptions.”

The U.S. embargo does have an impact on what goods Cuba receives from other countries. For example, if any trading good contains 10% of U.S. created content, it must go through U.S. law in order to be exported into Cuba. 

“When you think of complicated things like airplanes or oil drilling platforms or scientific or medical equipment, sometimes those things are caught up in that 10%,” .. “And so U.S. law does not allow that to be exported to Cuba even though 90% or 89% was produced in France or Canada, or something like that.”

Maxwell further pointed out that foreign companies that are owned or patrolled by the U.S. might be reluctant to engage in business with Cuba. The Helms-Burton Act allows U.S. nationals to sue entities that do business involving property that was confiscated by the Cuban government. The rule didn’t go into effect until 2019, when the Trump administration gave it the green light."

Please forgive the Capitalist slant on that news outlet I linked to, it is coming from NBC news, a MIC/Deep State owned news company in the most wealthy country on the planet.

So whatever protests in Florida from Cuban exiles, currently being filmed and made out by US news that they are coming from Cuba plus any real Cuban people protesting, should make US citizens think. That despite all the politics, embargoes, and attacks on this tiny country, they still have some of the finest medical treatments for free in the world - The Cubans even sent doctors overseas for free to help 40 countries in need of help during the COVID pandemic. 

No matter how poor people in Cuba are, at least they get free Health Care from medical staff prepared to go round the world and help others in need at the same time. They do not act like the richest country on earth that would rather go to war killing people, than let their own citizens have free health care during a pandemic. 

I could never imagine the US doing what the Cuban's did for free, but then that's what Communism install's in people, a sense of working for the good of man and society, not purely for the green paper money payday. 

Of course there are inherent problems with Communism, just read Orwell's Animal Farm. Communism only works in a small community where everyone can voice their decisions, the only thing I can think of that nears true communism apart from small hippy camps are maybe the Kibbutz in Israel where they were small enough not to have to separate into a "ruling class" that made the decisions, and the workers that followed them. 

That is why no REAL communist society has every existed on this earth, the USSR had two many people, and just like China, North Korea and Cuba they have a ruling class and then the workers. It is a two class system, one that the USA is becoming more and more alike, with the rich 1% Oligarchy at the top enriching themselves by any means and then the rest of the population who have to struggle and survive every day, doing whatever they can to get by, as there is no real social safety net.

Now of course you can argue that point for ever, but when you compare Cuba to the USA, and the amount of embargoes they have had to suffer over the years. You have to be amazed at what balls they have, to still be driving around their island in pristine condition cars from the 60's and be such a welcoming friendly people, despite all the propaganda the US puts out about them

So despite the "nuances" the "fact checker" site stating that there is "No total embargo on Cuba", in reality they still are being deprived of important items, goods that would have probably helped stop any unrest before it began. 

Can you imagine if the people of the Island could not just rely on tourism, and be able to import and export their own goods, with no interference from the USA?

What the country would look like today if it hadn't have lived the whole of this century and half of the last within a siege mentality. Such a state of mind only rallies the people together against their enemy, rather than conspire to other throw their leaders, which the USA always seems to be hoping for.

I wonder if they hadn't have had to stick together as a society in the face of US imperialism over the years, whether naturally they would they have loosened their tight Soviet like, secret police controls, and opened up to the world naturally or even implemented Capitalism like China has. A country that is basically Capitalist with bribery, run by one Communist party. They have spies all over the world working for US politicians, businesses, universities and stealing information for their 1st allegiance - the party, so that China can use it to increase their GDP or advance Defence technologies.

It is the same with Iran, when all the Iranians hear on their TV is how the US/UK is about to attack them, and wants to invade them for their oil, is it no wonder that the people support the government rather than try to other throw it. 

They only have to look at how the US has just invaded Syria to protect their CIA/Saudi funded jihadists from being wiped out by the Russians, as well as steal their oil and food supply to make them starve, to see a real example of US foreign policy. I thought al-Qaeda/ISIS and all their offshoots that have been backed by the AXIS of evil were our enemies in the war on terror, shouldn't we want them eliminated by the Russians?

So instead of trying to overthrow the revolution, the Cuban's are huddling together because they know that just a few miles across the water lies the worlds biggest bully who has it's sights firmly placed on them. I remember learning at college what a brilliant film industry they have over there and how good their medical care is, with the obvious free treatment at hospitals for all citizens - like most modern countries apart from the USA. 

As long as you are not reading an anti Cuban exile's blog on everything that is bad in this Communist country, then you may learn some truth about the country, even US TV shows and Films, that show visitors to Cuba like, "The House of Lies", and films like "Fast and Furious - The Fate Of The Furious", show the country in a very positive light.

However the US elite, has always hated Cuba, ever since all the rich people had their land taken off them after the revolution, and having a Russian proxy so close to their land. The Bay of Pig's failed invasion, never helped put the US in a good light, nor did all the assassination attempts on Fidel Castro's life which have been freely admitted. 

However the anti Cuban feeling from people who have risked their lives to escape the island on floating shacks to get to America is very strong. The USA only seems to listen to the pro-capitalist information from exiles, rather than interview real Cuban's living in the country, so it is a very one sided propaganda situation that US citizens get to hear.

Would you take the word of an ex American who got refugee status in China when he tells you how horrible life in the Capitalist USA is,. How the 1% earn all the money, and jobs are being taken away from the working class, forced to work gig jobs, as an Amazon or Uber driver, with no employment status or security, and therefore health care or pension plan. Plus no country wide social safety net, corruption at the top of politics, with a constant war economy, attacking any country that refuses to buy it's oil in petrodollars?

Well actually I could believe those parts, but you get what I mean. Someone who has escaped from one country to live in another, is always going to paint their ex home as the worse of the two. They want asylum so of course they are going to love their new home and only repeat the bad things about their old one when asked by the media.

So sure in very simple terms, the Cuban regime is Communist in name, just like the one in China. However China is more of a threat to the USA, it's a Commie country that the American's are all too happy to do business with. All whilst the Chinese regime persecute the Muslim Uighur population in Xinjiang. 

A population where supposedly 1 million are being locked up in "re-education" or "death camps", depending on your point of view. Survivors have told how women are subjected to "systematic rape, sterilization and forced abortions". However the US seems to have no problem with this behaviour whilst trading with the Chinese, but they do when it comes to tiny Cuba,

Whilst the Cuban regime might be tough on dissidents and opponents of the revolution, they are certainly not doing anything as bad as the rulers of China are. They are probably not even keeping their own prisoners in the same sorry state that America is doing to their prisoners that are still being held in Gitmo, a part of Cuba they still control. It hypocrisy at it's highest.

So sanctions by the US against North Korea, Russia, Venezuela, Iran and Cuba and any other county the US feels it has  the power to bully, only ever hurt the average citizen, whilst never affecting those at the top, who can always get what they need or want whatever blockades are being placed on their country. 

In my lifetime, I cannot remember one time where blockades and sanctions have ever worked in the way the USA always hopes they will. When Madeleine Albright said in the 90's just before the Gulf War, that killing half a million Iraqi children through their tough sanctions on the country was worth it, I like many others was shocked.

Was she just being the usual sick war mongering, neo-con or did those in power really believe that killing so many children through sanctions would do anything in the slightest to make the Iraqi people rise up and overthrow Saddam Hussein themselves, because it didn't. In fact after the war, when the Southern Shia's did try and attempt to other throw Hussein, the US/UK allies all abandoned them and let them be slaughtered. 

Is it any wonder people in the Middle East do not trust our word?

Quote from the Gateway Pundit about the US sanctions on Iraq before the Gulf War:

Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: "We have heard that a half a million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?"

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price–we think the price is worth it."

You can watch the video here > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omnskeu-puE - sick or, what?

So when I hear that the CIA is now talking about US agents being affected by directed energy weapon beams, I have to wonder if this is just a ploy to get American's stoked up for another, Bay of Pigs type invasion.

It's either that or the Cuban's have had enough of being bullied by the the most powerful country on Earth, who trains assassins that kill President's of little poor countries like Haiti, and therefore think that they can do no wrong, even when setting up coups in South America, Europe and Asia. 

I will let you decide what to make of the story, whether it just something planted by Operation Mockingbird agents, that now run the media without shame, or whether it could be true.

From Reuters...

CIA probe of 'Havana syndrome' to be led by Bin Laden search veteran -source

www.reuters.com

WASHINGTON, July 21 (Reuters) - A CIA official who was involved in the search for Osama bin Laden has been chosen to head an agency task force investigating cases of an ailment known as "Havana Syndrome" among U.S. spies and diplomats, a government source said on Wednesday.

CIA director William Burns named a career undercover spy, who was part of the search for the al Qaeda leader that ended with him being killed by U.S. forces in Pakistan in 2011, the source said. The Wall Street Journal first reported the appointment.

Dozens of U.S. diplomats and other officials, including CIA officers, have been afflicted by "Havana Syndrome," so named because it first was reported by officials assigned to the U.S. embassy in Cuba.

The Journal said that a panel organized by the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine reported last December that some type of "directed energy" beams were strongly suspected as causing the ailment, which includes dizziness, headaches and nausea.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in June that a government-wide review was underway into who or what caused suspected radio frequency attacks "directed" at diplomats.

Austria has been working with U.S. authorities to investigate a spate of suspected cases among U.S. diplomats in Vienna, the Austrian Foreign Ministry said on Saturday.

Since U.S. President Joe Biden took office in January, roughly two dozen intelligence officers, diplomats and other officials in Vienna have reported symptoms similar to those of Havana syndrome, making it the second-biggest hotspot after Havana, the New Yorker magazine reported on Friday.

The National Security Agency (NSA) said in a 2014 memo to one intelligence officer who said he had suffered possible symptoms that an unnamed "hostile country" to which the official travelled in the late 1990s had a "high powered microwave system weapon that may have the ability to weaken, intimidate or kill an enemy over time and without leaving evidence."

The memo, which was read by Reuters, said intelligence indicated that such a weapon was "designed to bathe a target's living quarters in microwaves, causing numerous physical effects, including a damaged nervous system."

Reporting By Mark Hosenball; Editing by Heather Timmons and Grant McCool

Now just think, if Cuba has the power, money and equipment to create and install, then actually use a directed energy weapon beam at American "Diplomats" (the usual cover name for spies in any country), then can you imagine what sort of directed energy beam weaponry the US has at it's own disposal? 

I don't know, but if the CIA are blaming Cuba of having a directed energy beam weapon at their disposal I would love to know what kind of energy beam weapons the USA uses. I do recall that there was supposedly a similar weapon used in the 91 Gulf War against the Iraqi's, at the time the 4th largest army on earth.

Apparently the American's had some sort of weapon that would implant thoughts into the enemy soldiers heads to the effect that they would think they were hearing the words of Allah or Mohammed telling them to surrender. 

How true this long held rumour is, I don't know, but I do remember that during that time, thousands upon thousands of Iraqi soldiers just got up out of their trenches and surrendered without a single shot being fired. What caused this to happen I don't know but if you go down the rabbit hole you can find articles deep in Googles engine, mostly de-ranked like many of my sites page's have been that talk about such as "Word of God" weapon.

We know that sound weapons exist, even shop keepers have little versions of them to keep youngsters from hanging outside their shops by buzzing a frequency that only young people can hear. So that adults can continue to enter the shop in peace and not hear anything whilst the kids are driven away by the horrible sound. 

Try it, download a dog whistle app onto your phone then play with the frequency in a room of people and see who can hear it and who can't. 

Obviously this is very basic, but we mere mortals are only given the scraps of devices built with our taxes, whilst the military get to play with some very highly advanced weaponry indeed. 

I just hope this excuse of an energy beam being directed at American's in Cuba, is not picked up by the MSM and be used to push for an invasion, just like the non existent WMD's in Iraq and the Fake Douma chemical attack in Syria, They were all ploys to bring Axis of War troops into combat and to get the public's sympathy for an invasion, and I can see this being used as one too.

As they say "The first casualty of war is truth",....

What do you think, would the small country of Cuba be stupid enough to bring about an invasion from the USA by attacking US personnel, or is it a fabricated or miss-understood story that is getting air time?

By Dark Politricks

© 2021 Dark Politricks

Please call Obama a Dictator not a Socialist!

By Dark Politricks - Is President Obama really a Communist or is he more of a dictator?

A quick lesson to all the people out there who keep calling Obama a Communist or a Socialist and interchanging these words with the word Liberal.

For me it really gets on my tits as its basic use of language and although I only went to a mere English comprehensive I do know the difference between these 3 words.

You only have to read a dictionary to see that the three sociological concepts are totally different from each other and that in no-way whatsoever is Obama leading America down a path to Communism.

If anything, since George W Bush - and if you really want to delve down the rabbit hole and talk about the FED, the 2 national banks before it, the assassinations of the Presidents who abolished those banks. The UK support for Southern states in the war of independence and the very little time it took from the first US President and the founding fathers to break many of the promises and declarations they had created in the constitution - then you can go back much earlier.

However it seems since Bush at least you have been on a road to fascism and dictatorship rather than communism and Obama is only following the one party line you have in the USA rather than making meaningful changes. You need look no further than all the things that have happened since 9.11 ( a coup-d'etat ) to see this:

• The PATRIOT ACT brought in although many US politicians didn't even bother reading it amidst a climate of fear and staged Anthrax attacks to push those against it to support it.
• Also don't forget the Orwellian nature of the name here.  Anyone who didn't support the PATRIOT ACT was called un-patriotic although the act itself brought in emergency laws which Americans are still living under.
• The NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) which allows the US President to detain US citizens without trial on his say so alone.
• Over a decade of war against an "idea" and enemy that will and can never be beaten.
• Lost liberties (too many to count).
• The ending of habeas corpus.
• Torture and black hole prisons everywhere.
• Extraordinary renditions
• Sweeping wiretaps.
• A militarised police force
• Drones flying the US skies
• TSA grope or virtual strip searches at airports ensuring a loss in tourism trade at the very least.
• A "big brother at school like" tool to be used to take out another countries enemies i.e Israel.
• A loss of moral standing in the world.
• Most of all it has shown the one-sidedness of your political system.

Whether Republican or Democrat the same policies remain in place whoever wins the election. Continual war, loss of liberty, ambivalence to the constitution and Bill of Rights, bail outs to Wall St and friends of the politicians i.e crony capitalism, subservience to overseas masters and the targeted assassination of people on the say so of the leader of the country.

If that is not dictatorship I don't know what is.

So lets check what these words that are banded about on late night talk shows actually mean.

From the Oxford English Dictionary

Dictatorship

• government by a dictator:
• the effects of forty years of dictatorship
• [count noun] a country governed by a dictator.
• absolute authority in any sphere.

Communsim A theory or system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs. Socialism

• A political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
• A policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
• (in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism.
• The term ‘socialism’ has been used to describe positions as far apart as anarchism, Soviet state Communism, and social democracy; however, it necessarily implies an opposition to the untrammelled workings of the economic market. The socialist parties that have arisen in most European countries from the late 19th century have generally tended towards social democracy.

Liberal

• Willing to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one’s own; open to new ideas.
• Liberal views towards divorce.
• Favourable to or respectful of individual rights and freedoms.
• Liberal citizenship laws.
• (in a political context) favouring individual liberty, free trade, and moderate political and social reform:
• A liberal democratic state
• relating to Liberals or a Liberal Party, especially (in the UK) relating to the Liberal Democrat party:
• the Liberal leader
• Theology regarding many traditional beliefs as dispensable, invalidated by modern thought, or liable to change.

Now although many Fox News presenters and their guests and many others like to call Obama a communist and compare what he is doing to the European socialists you need to understand that even in countries within Europe that have "socialist" parties like the UK used to with Old Labour they are not really true socialist countries.

Here in the UK since Tony Blair managed to turn the Labour party into a "3rd way" party we have little if no choice at the election box between proper alternatives in the same way as Americans don't.

As they say the Democratic party in the USA is the 2nd most conservative party in the world.

When we vote we don't get to vote on things that really matter like:

• If the surveillance police state would be rolled back or dismantled completely.
• If the money wasted on nuclear bombs and million pound planes and boats would be better spent educating people so we can live in a true meritocracy.
• Whether drugs should be legalised.
• Whether bankers should end up in jail when they ruin the worlds economy, fix Libor interest rates, launder money for Mexican drug cartels and terrorists as they have been proven to be doing continually.
• Whether lobbyists should be banned and political parties funded by tax payers.
• Whether we should pull our troops out of all the many war zones they are in and have a say in any future war that wastes millions, maims and kills thousands, and creates enemies for us to continually fight in the future.
• Whether we can pull out of the failed European project altogether or even join the Euro (for those numb-nuts that want to)

No we get to vote on things like.

• Who will cut the deficit a little bit faster or slower.
• Who "might" give us a vote on our staying in Europe (it doesn't actually matter as whoever wins always breaks this promise!)
• Will VAT / Sales tax go up a couple percent or not or income tax margins down or up a percent or two.
• Whether we slash 20% or 15% out of every ministry and public sector organisation - putting thousands on the dole and creating more deficit to pay back due to dole money.
• How much of the country should go from working in public sector jobs, paying taxes, paying for their families and homes and put them on the dole, increasing the national debt because the "private sector will rush in and fill the hole" - proved wrong so far Georgey boy!
• How much tongue should be put up the arse of the current US President just so we can say we are "special buddies" and all that crap.

So there is no real choice in elections and we are truly voting for our favourite colour or who we would go down the pub with for a beer.

All pure pony.

What I don't get in America is the talk of "entitlements" as if you would rather your taxes are spent shooting $500,000 missiles into mud huts in Somalia rather than being set aside to pay for you in old age.

Or for when you lose your job due to a bankster company or Republican candidate off-shoring it to India or China. Then the banks come and re-posses your home and you have no-one to help you but the state and you then realise that you should of voted for your taxes to be spent on community welfare not on overseas imperialism.

All you want is some help to stay housed, clothed and fed.

Why would you call that money you have given to the government an "entitlement" when it is paid back to you in negative terms?

Yes you are entitled to it as you have paid for it. Saving for a rainy day and all that.

Yes there are those people who haven't worked for generations. Lived off the dole and food stamps and couldn't get a job even if they wanted one because of the poor school they went to.

That is a different question and one which the richest country in the world should be able to solve without having such a disparity between the poor and middle class and the very rich.

Study after study shows that in countries (call them socialist if you want) where the gap between poorest and richest is narrowest there is more productivity and more general happiness in the population.


What is more important - that you pack as many boxes for your boss in the day and work yourself into an early grave or achieving some modicum of happiness in this short life we have?

Do you really want to live fighting against some belief system or theory you heard Glenn Beck talk about. Following his chalk board drawings which always lead up to the same leftist groups as evil puppet masters controlling the world.


Believe it or not there are two sides to the story and George Soros doesn't lie behind all of the left as their ultimate controller just as the Koch Brothers don't lie behind the right.

However as I wrote in a recent last essay once you have met Maslows hierarchy of needs and have all the money you could possibly wish for.

The only thing left to do with it is either spend it altruistically helping people or attempt to gain power by supporting politicans who will have to pay you back once they are elected.

So next time you call the President a Communist or a Socialist remember that they are different meanings from the word Liberal and not interchangeable. 


Plus to us overseas viewers will look at you as if you are an idiot for saying it.

Call him a fascist, call him illiberal and a warmonger but the American nation is as far away from Communist North Korea as the moon is from Earth.

Whether you chose to believe in the definition of the word or not a Liberal believes in free markets, freedom of choice, small government and of course social reform.

If we didn't have social reform we would still be chucking our human waste out into the middle of the street and dying of bubonic plague, whilst the rich held slaves as property and the poor had to send their children off to work as chimney sweeps just to earn a living.

Certain countries in this world still behave like this - it is not pleasant. You can believe it or not but there are good reasons for not wanting to stay in the 17th century.